LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
January 29/2018
Compiled &
Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias18/english.january29.18.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations
In the beginning was the Word, and
the Word was with God, and the Word was God
John 01/01-18: "In the
beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was
in the beginning with God. All things came to be through him, and without him
nothing came to be. What came to be through him was life, and this life was the
light of the human race; the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has
not overcome it. A man named John was sent from God. He came for testimony, to
testify to the light, so that all might believe through him. He was not the
light, but came to testify to the light. The true light, which enlightens
everyone, was coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world came to
be through him, but the world did not know him. He came to what was his own, but
his own people did not accept him. But to those who did accept him he gave power
to become children of God, to those who believe in his name, who were born not
by natural generation nor by human choice nor by a man's decision but of God.
And the Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us, and we saw his glory,
the glory as of the Father's only Son, full of grace and truth. John testified
to him and cried out, saying, "This was he of whom I said, 'The one who is
coming after me ranks ahead of me because he existed before me.'" From his
fullness we have all received, grace in place of grace, because while the law
was given through Moses, grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has
ever seen God. The only Son, God, who is at the Father's side, has revealed him.
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin
analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on January 28-29/18
Hezbollah Has Destroyed the Lebanon I Once Knew/Hanin
Ghaddar/The Wall Street Journal/January 29/18
IDF Spokesman Warns Lebanon Of War With Israel If Iranian Presence Grows/Anna
Ahronheim/Jerusalem Post/January 28/18
US, the Rule of Law/Noah Feldman/Bloomberg/January 28/18
Russian Bots Are Right: Releasethememo/Eli Lake/Bloomberg/January 28/18
Belgium: How Low Can a Low Country Get/Bruce Bawer/Gatestone Institute/January
28/18
Living in Pakistan - A Hell for Non-Muslims/Rahat John Austin/ Gatestone
Institute/January 28/18
Iran spends billions on weapons programs, terrorism while ignoring Iranians'
basic needs, report finds/Ben Evansky/Fox News/January 28/18
Jordan’s foreign policy message from Davos/Shehab Al-Makahleh/Al Arabiya/January
28/18
Syria: From revolution to occupation/Riad Nasan Agha/Al Arabiya/January 28/18
Titles For Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on
January 28-29/18
Hezbollah Has Destroyed the Lebanon I Once Knew
Rahi blasts politicians' practices
Machnouk: No legitimacy to Hezbollah's arms in the absence of a national defense
strategy in confrontation of Israel
Kataeb Cadres Hold Electoral Workshop Ahead of Official Campaign Launch
Ex-FPM Official Fires Back at Bou Saab's Remarks
Bou Saab Disavows OTV Rhetoric, Says It Does Not Reflect FPM Ethics
Abi Khalil, Bassil inaugurate sewage treatment project in Chekka
Israeli warplanes circle over Marj'Ayoun region
Kidanian inaugurates ski season in Kfardebian: It is our duty to market this
region, media must show its positive aspects
Hasbani: Paris funds without reforms will establish grounds for revolution
instead of desired stability
Bou Saab Distances FPM from OTV's Attacks on Berri
Bouassi says LF will not ally with Hezbollah in upcoming elections
Berri Still at Odds with Hariri over Disputed Decree
Prosecution Sues ad-Diyar and Its Editor for 'Insulting' Saudi King
Beirut Protest after Spate of Violent Deaths of Women
Nasrallah discusses developments with Raisi
IDF Spokesman Warns Lebanon Of War With Israel If Iranian Presence Grows
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on January 28-29/18
Syria Kurds Say Won't Join Sochi Peace Talks
Pressing Syria Offensive, Turkey Urges U.S. Pullback
Navalny Arrested as Thousands Rally against Putin and 'Pseudo-Polls'
Yemen's Southern Separatists: Thirsting for Lost Independence
Yemen Govt. Warns of Coup as Separatists Take Over Headquarters
Cyprus Votes for President with Eyes on New Peace Push
Kabul on High Alert after Ambulance Bomb Toll Tops 100
Abbas :'Oslo Accords are Dead'
Saudi Arabia: Corruption-related Settlements File in its Final Stages
Kabul bombing death toll rises to 103, with 235 wounded
Latest Lebanese Related News published
on January 28-29/18
Hezbollah Has Destroyed the Lebanon I Once Knew
حنين غدار/حزب الله دمر لبنان الذي كنت اعرفه
By Hanin Ghaddar/The Wall Street
Journal/January 29/18
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/62151
I was sentenced to six months in jail simply for criticizing the Iran-backed
terror group’s role.
I recently learned that Lebanon’s Military Tribunal has sentenced me in absentia
to six months in prison. After speaking about Hezbollah’s role in Lebanon and
Syria, I was charged with defaming the Lebanese army. When my lawyer called to
notify me of the ruling, I realized the Lebanon I once knew is gone.
In 2014 I spoke at a Washington Institute conference in the U.S. capital. During
a panel discussion, I noted that the Lebanese military targets Sunni groups
while showing preferences for Shiite groups like Hezbollah. This prompted
Hezbollah’s media to launch a campaign of threats against me. Because former
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak was at the conference, the Hezbollah media
claimed it was treason for me, a Lebanese Shiite, to attend.
Lebanese citizenship, in theory, provides a constitutionally guaranteed right to
free expression. But Lebanon today is no longer about the constitution or
citizenship. Hezbollah’s influence matters more. Simply because I am a Lebanese
Shiite journalist who is critical of Hezbollah, I have been sentenced to prison.
As the news of my punishment emerged, another journalist was summoned to another
court. The list of Lebanese journalists being tried for publishing articles or
posting on social media is growing. The message is clear: Lebanese citizens have
the right to speak only if they conform to the dictates of the authorities and
their rhetoric.
Increasingly authority belongs to Hezbollah, which state institutions, under
pressure, recognize as “the resistance, the army and the people.” The group
claims power over the state and its citizens, and consecutive governments have
acquiesced. Hezbollah persecutes those who criticize this arrangement—especially
if they’re Shiite. Being a woman doesn’t help.
Opposition to Israel drives every aspect of Hezbollah’s politics. Protest the
organization’s actions in Lebanon or the region, and you’re tagged a servant of
Israel, a traitor. Hezbollah uses its “existential war” against the Jewish state
as a pretext to clamp down on basic freedoms. In the name of Palestine,
Hezbollah is terrorizing everyday Lebanese citizens. It has isolated the Shiite
community and waged wars in the region on behalf of Iran. And it does all of
this while appropriating Lebanon’s state institutions.
Lebanon was once a unique, free country in a region brimming with dictatorships
and autocrats. Today its state institutions are eradicating those freedoms.
Refugees are suffering, the economy is collapsing, and Lebanese are flocking to
embassies in Beirut seeking to emigrate. Garbage fills the streets and pollution
has reached dangerous levels. All this happens in the name of Palestine.
And if people prefer not to perish for “the resistance,” they can go to prison.
For Lebanon’s military court, a journalist expressing a critical opinion
endangers the country more than the litany of crimes committed by Hezbollah
abroad and at home.
Lebanese people used to say that Hezbollah is a state within the Lebanese state.
Today, it seems that Lebanon is a small state within Hezbollah’s state.
Thankfully, because I enjoy the safety of a fellowship in Washington, I won’t be
going to prison. But there’s something that only those living inside Lebanon can
feel: The country is now becoming one large prison.
*Ms. Ghaddar, former managing editor of Lebanon’s Now website, is a visiting
fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Rahi blasts politicians' practices
Sun 28 Jan 2018/NNA - Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Bechara Boutros Rahi
criticized on Sunday the practices of Lebanese politicians, considering that
"they disrupt the productive work in the Parliament, government and
administrations.""Political officials are not entitled to continue in a
situation of uncertainty and fear of the other, with sharp differences on the
simplest matters, rivalry, mutual accusations and heated debates," Rahi said
during Sunday's Mass service in Bkirki. "No one has the right to monopolize the
national decision and impose it on others, to encroach on the law and block the
judicial decisions, and to block the roads, allowing the hegemony of influential
and armed men," the Patriarch added. Rahi went on to say that these actions do
not reflect the image of democratic Lebanon that is characterized by pluralism
and unity, human rights and the promotion of modern civilization. "Lebanon is a
country of Christian-Muslim interaction, from which stems its distinguished
identity," he added.The Patriarch explained that "Lebanon does not consist of
two opposing lines that do not converge, but rather of two different lines that
meet in national unity.""These are the essential elements of the formation of a
civil status in Lebanon, a state where the people are the source of power, not
religion...A state founded on human rights, regardless of religious affiliation,
race or social status...A state that does not go against religion and divine
texts, but is inspired by human, moral and social principles...A state whose
national pact is inherent to the essence of the Constitution," Rahi concluded.
Machnouk: No legitimacy to Hezbollah's arms in
the absence of a national defense strategy in confrontation of Israel
Sun 28 Jan 2018/NNA - Interior Minister Nuhad Machnouk said on Sunday that there
is no legitimacy to Hezbollah's weapons in the absence of a national defense
strategy in the face of Israel. During a ceremony in honor of Mount Lebanon
Governor Mohammad Mekkaoui held in Beirut in the presence of Mufti of the
Republic, Sheikh Abdul-Latif Derian, Minister Machnouk deemed that no decision
passes in Lebanon without the capital's consent. He added that Beirut is the
capital that draws the Lebanese together, in addition to being a meeting place
for all Arabs, noting that "through our strength and steadfastness, Beirut can
remain a source of stability for all the Lebanese."Touching on the upcoming
parliamentary elections, Machnouk noted that "Lebanon is a country based on
democracy and elections, which will take place on May 6 and which we hope would
not to be a platform for further differences and confrontations that serve only
our adversaries...Instead, we seek tranquility and calm, for the new vote law is
not easy." Machnouk revealed that the Future Bloc's electoral lists would be
complete throughout the Lebanese territories.
Kataeb Cadres Hold Electoral Workshop Ahead of Official
Campaign Launch
Kataeb.org/January 28/18/Kataeb's officials, politburo members and cadres
convened on Sunday for a workshop ahead of the party's official launching of its
electoral campaign on February 4.The Kataeb's Second Deputy-President Salim
Sayegh outlined the party's role in creating a public opinion that enforces
accountability, deeming the upcoming elections as a major turning point.
"Everyone has realized the urgent need for change by electing people who have a
rescue plan for the country," Sayegh said. "The Kataeb party has managed to make
the opposition forces' voice heard by the international community." "Keeping the
current situation unchanged will definitely pose a great risk to the country's
stability," he warned. Later, the Kataeb's Deputy
Secretary-General Patrick Richa, who also serves as the campaign manager,
explained how the party's electoral machine will work as he eleborated on the
main phases to go through on the path to the elections.
The attendees were also provided with an in-depth insight into the
stipulations of the new electoral law.
Ex-FPM Official Fires Back at Bou Saab's Remarks
Kataeb.org/January 28/18/Former Free Patriotic Movement official, Fouad Chehab,
on Sunday fired back at remarks made by the President's adviser, Elias Bou saab,
who refused to label the Syrian presence in Lebanon as an occupation. In an
interview held earlier on Sunday on New TV, Bou Saab stated that the Syrian
presence in Lebanon was never an act of occupation, describing it as
"necessary". "What a shame! Go tell the martyrs' parents that this has become
your rhetoric," Chehab wrote on his Facebook page.
"Your excellency, neither you nor anyone else can alter our history and
struggle," he added.
Bou Saab Disavows OTV Rhetoric, Says It Does Not
Reflect FPM Ethics
Kataeb.org/January 28/18/Adviser to the President of the Republic, former
Minister Elias Bou Saab, on Sunday criticized the rhetoric adopted in the intro
of yesterday's news bulletin on OTV, saying that the Free Patriotic Movement is
not used to such a fiery language. “Using the same language on the NBN channel
does not mean that we have to follow suit. This does not mirror our ethics. This
only reflects the viewpoint of the OTV channel, not the Free Patriotic
Movement,” Saab said in an interview on New TV. OTV and NBN are stations
affiliated to the Free Patriotic Movement and the Amal Movement, respectively.
Rival parties have engaged in a tug of war amid a political confrontation
between President Michel Aoun and Speaker Nabih Berri over a decree promoting a
number of Army officers. Tensions have increased lately amid reports that Berri
has called on his supporters living in Ivory Coast to boycott the Diaspora
Energy Conference held by the Foreign Ministry in Abidjan next week.
"It is true that we are at odds with Speaker Nabih Berri regarding the seniority
decree, but this doesn’t mean that the issue should be addressed that way by
both TV stations," he said. In its evening new
bulletin aired on Saturday, OTV launched a scathing attack against Berri,
without actually naming him, accusing the latter of being a subordinate to Syria
and the U.S. "We are proud that we didn't steal the nation's money," it added,
implicitly labeling the Amal Movement supporters as "thugs". On
Sunday, the OTV shifted its scorching lambasting to Bou Saab, hinting at
"accounts in suspicious banks" and "business ties with mafias". "We speak in the
name of the martyrs and those who have been struggling for over 25 years," read
the OTV intro, which also lashed out at "intruders", "double agents" and
"refugee funds thieves" who "beg" for a post and a seat, in what appeared to be
a message to Bou Saab. "We are bigger than this because our cause, our martyrs,
our movement and our leader are more important," it concluded. Saab had also
called on the supporters of the Amal movement and the Free Patriotic Movement to
cease their war of words on social media websites, stressing that all this
bickering will lead to nowhere. “Your Excellency, had you known how many FPM
official, leader and activist had shared the OTV intro on their Facebook pages,
you would not have said what you said today," Marada Politburo member Chady Saad
said. “Your Excellency, these have been the FPM ethics during the past few
years, noting that many of the party's members were expelled for disapproving
them."
Abi Khalil, Bassil inaugurate sewage treatment
project in Chekka
Sun 28 Jan 2018/NNA - Water and Energy Minister Ceasar Abi Khalil inaugurated
Sunday, in the presence of Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil, a sewage treatment
project governed by the municipalities of Chekka and Anfeh in northern Lebanon.
Minister Abi Khalil outlined the steps of the project financed by the Embassy of
France and the French Development Agency, highlighting the importance of work
and achievements versus remaining idle and wasting time and opportunities.
According to his remarks, the Free Patriotic Movement will never alter its
methods and will pursue its efforts in the realization of projects that serve
the Lebanese, noting that the project inaugurated today is part of a series of
several other plans for the Batroun Caza. In turn, Minister Bassil indicated
that the inaugurated project is proof of the implementation of several promises
made to citizens of the region. In this context, Bassil thanked the French State
and the Council for Development and Construction, which has provided a model for
cooperation between state institutions. He said the villages in the Chekka
neighborhood would benefit from the project related to water resources and
electricity.
Israeli warplanes circle over Marj'Ayoun region
Sun 28 Jan 2018/NNA - Israeli enemy warplanes are circling at this instant over
the Southern Lebanese region of Marj'Ayoun and its surrounding neighborhood, NNA
correspondent reported.
Kidanian inaugurates ski season in Kfardebian:
It is our duty to market this region, media must show its positive aspects
Sun 28 Jan 2018/NNA - Tourism Minister Ouadis Kidanian toured Sunday the skiing
resort centers in Kfardebian, declaring the start of the ski season for this
year and highlighting the need to "market this region" while calling on the
media to "expose its positive features.""Lebanon is one of the most important
countries that enjoy winter tourism, especially in this region...I have already
indicated the need to balance between portraying the negative and positive
aspects in the country...I hope media channels would cover positive news at the
beginning of news bulletins, for we are supposed to be proud of the blessings we
have in our nature...This is Lebanon, a piece of heaven," said Kidanian. "It is
our duty as a Tourism Ministry to also market this region, through our contacts
with tour operators, conferences and activities in the world, sending out
brochures showing the beauty of our nature," the Tourism Minister added.
Hasbani: Paris funds without reforms will
establish grounds for revolution instead of desired stability
Sun 28 Jan 2018/NNA - Deputy Prime Minister, Public Health Minister Ghassan
Hasbani warned Sunday of pinning hopes on a breakthrough in Lebanon's economic
crisis with the convening of the Paris 4 Conference (Cedre), deeming that "Paris
funds without reforms will establish grounds for a revolution instead of the
desired stability." "The launch of any commitments we are unable to implement
later will cause great frustration," said Hasbani in an interview to the Arab
Economic News Website. "Following the conference and the parliamentary
elections, we will enter into the event of waiting for the money. We will
neglect the reforms we have to do internally, which are enough to save us from
waiting for external funding," he added. Hasbani expressed keen concern for the
success of the Cedre Conference in accordance with the framework set by the
international community, "otherwise, it will not lead to the desired results,
especially if Lebanon fails to implement its promises and commitments."
He considered that the aim of reconstruction conferences is to provide
continuity of economic growth, employment opportunities and social stability.
However, he indicated that "the experiences of global investment in
reconstruction projects could be detrimental to Lebanon if it does not implement
the series of political, administrative and financial reforms." "International
support should be given in a measured and expeditious manner. Priority should be
given in the displacement dossier to sanitation, electricity, public health and
education," Hasbani underscored.
Bou Saab Distances FPM from OTV's Attacks on Berri
Naharnet/January 28/18/President
Michel Aoun's International Cooperation Adviser ex-minister Elias Bou Saab
sought Sunday to distance the Free Patriotic Movement from OTV's recent attacks
on Speaker Nabih Berri and the AMAL Movement. "We in the FPM are not used to the
rhetoric that was used in OTV's news bulletin intro. This does not mean that NBN
television which used a similar language was right," Bou Saab said in an
interview on al-Jadeed TV. "It is true that we are in a dispute with Parliament
Speaker Nabih Berri over the (army officers) seniority decree, but that does not
mean that the issue should be addressed in this manner on OTV and NBN," the
former minister added. And urging "all supporters of AMAL Movement and the FPM
to end the ongoing debate on social networking websites," Bou Saab revealed that
"an agreement was reached in the FPM's political council to coordinate with
media outlets affiliated with the FPM or close to it in order to serve the FPM's
goals."He added: "This media approach towards the seniority decree will not lead
to a result... President Michel Aoun has said that he will abide by any decision
by the judicial authorities."Bou Saab also reassured that the FPM and its chief
Jebran Bassil "have not taken any decision to broadcast TV reports that attack
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri."
Bouassi says LF will not ally with Hezbollah in upcoming
elections
Sun 28 Jan 2018/NNA - Minister of Social Affairs Pierre Bouassi said Sunday that
the Lebanese Forces would not ally with Hezbollah in the upcoming legislative
elections. "We will have no alliance with Hezbollah in respect for our
positions, political constants and people," Bouassi said during an interview to
"Radio Liban" Station. The Minister deemed that the preferential vote in the new
legislative law would minimize the voice influence of Hezbollah supporters in
the overall outcome of the elections. As for the alliance between the Lebanese
Forces and the Progressive Socialist Party, Bouassi said "it is up to the LF
leadership to decide whether to ally or not." He anticipated that there would be
agreements in some constituencies between the Free Patriotic Movement and the
LF, if both parties see common grounds.Bouassi concluded by saying that the
elections would be a turning point in Lebanese politics, reminding that Lebanon
is endowed with democracy and freedom.
Berri Still at Odds with Hariri over Disputed Decree
Naharnet/January 28/18/Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri is still at odds with
Prime Minister Saad Hariri after the latter signed a disputed decree along with
President Michel Aoun without referring it to the finance minister.
"The Speaker is still at odds with the Premier, who had promised him not to sign
the decree before changing his mind later and agreeing to sign it," sources
close to Berri told Asharq al-Awsat newspaper in remarks published Sunday.
"Had PM Saad Hariri kept his promise, the crisis between Speaker Nabih Berri and
President Michel Aoun would not have reached this extent," the sources noted.
"In the absence of a solution to the dispute over the decree, the Berri-Hariri
relation will not improve," the sources added. The Aoun-Berri spat broke out
after the president and the premier signed a decree granting one-year seniority
to a number of officers. Berri and Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil have
insisted that the decree should have also carried the finance minister's
signature. Aoun and his aides have argued that the decree did not require
Khalil's signature because it did not entail any “financial burden,” a point
Berri and officials close to him have argued against. Ain el-Tineh sources have
meanwhile warned that the decree would tip sectarian balance in favor of
Christians in the army's highest echelons.The officers in question were
undergoing their first year of officer training at the Military Academy when
Syrian forces ousted Aoun's military government from Baabda in 1990. They were
suspended by the pro-Damascus authorities until 1993 before they resumed their
officer training course as second-year cadets.
Prosecution Sues ad-Diyar and Its Editor for
'Insulting' Saudi King
Naharnet/January 28/18/The public prosecution has filed a lawsuit against ad-Diyar
newspaper and its owner and editor-in-chief Charles Ayoub on charges of
insulting Saudi King Salman, the daily said on Sunday. The prosecution has
demanded a one-year's jail term and a fine for Ayoub, ad-Diyar said. According
to the newspaper, Ayoub had likened the Saudi monarch to controversial medieval
Muslim theologian Ibn Taymiyyah and called Saudi minister Thamer al-Sabhan an
"Israeli agent."Ayoub's article was published during the Lebanese-Saudi crisis
that followed Prime Minister Saad Hariri's controversial resignation while in
the kingdom. The public prosecution had on Friday filed a lawsuit against the
comedian Hisham Haddad, the host of 'Lahonwbas', Lebanon's most watched
satirical TV show. Haddad is accused of "insulting" Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed
bin Salman and Hariri during one of his show's episodes.
Beirut Protest after Spate of Violent Deaths of Women
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 28/18/Dozens of people have protested
outside the Lebanese parliament against violence against women, denouncing
inaction by the authorities after eight women have been killed since early
December. The demonstration was organized by civil society groups including the
feminist association Kafa, which wants legislative reforms to protect women from
domestic violence. Red wooden cut-out silhouettes representing victims including
the eight were set up in the square outside parliament. Demonstrators brandished
placards bearing slogans including "Anger is no excuse" and "No funeral before
justice". Since early December, eight women have died violently in Lebanon,
including a wife shot dead by her husband on Monday in Beirut. Also among the
dead were a 15-year-old who killed herself over an early marriage and British
embassy employee Rebecca Dykes who was strangled by a taxi driver who tried to
rape her. "Women are dying one after the other because of inaction by the
legislative, executive and judicial powers that don't consider this to be a
priority issue," said a statement signed by several NGOs. In 2014, Lebanon
passed a law that for the first time set down penalties for domestic violence
after an unprecedented campaign sparked by the murders of several women by their
husbands. However, the Kafa group is demanding that the law be amended to lay
down more rigorous penalties for conjugal violence and to ensure that cases are
dealt with faster. "We want justice -- justice for Zahraa and all the girls. We
want the criminals to be punished," said 50-year-old Ali al-Qabbout, referring
to his daughter who was killed more than a year ago by her ex-husband.
Nasrallah discusses developments with Raisi
Sun 28 Jan 2018/NNA - Hezbollah Secretary General, Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah,
received on Sunday Iranian cleric and the current custodian and chairman of
Astan Quds, Ebrahim Raisi, in presence of Iranian Ambassador to Lebanon,
Mohammad Fathali and a number of Hezbollah leaders. Talks reportedly touched on
the latest political developments in the broader region, as well as the cultural
and social issues of mutual concern, as per a statement by Party Media Bureau.
IDF Spokesman Warns Lebanon Of War With Israel If Iranian Presence Grows
Anna Ahronheim/Jerusalem
Post/January 28/18
IDF Spokesman Brig.-Gen. Ronen Manelis warned in a rare op-ed on a Lebanese
opposition website that a war with Israel could break out if Iran develops
precision missiles in the country.
“Lebanon has become - both by its own actions and omissions and by a blind eye
from many members of the international community - one large missile factory,”
Manelis wrote on the Ahewar website.
"It's no longer a transfer of arms, funds or consultation. Iran has de-facto
opened a new branch, the 'Lebanon branch.' Iran is here," he said.
“In Lebanon, Hezbollah does not conceal its attempt to take control of the
state,” he continued, adding that “in the shadow of Nasrallah’s bullying
behavior” the terror group has built “terror infrastructure and factories to
manufacture weapons under the nose of the Lebanese government.”
Israel and Hezbollah fought a deadly 33-day war in 2006, which came to an end
under UN Security Council Resolution 1701 which called for disarmament of
Hezbollah, for withdrawal of the Israeli army from Lebanon, for the deployment
of the Lebanese army and an enlarged UN force in the south.
“This past year (2017), like the 11 years that preceded it since the end of the
Second Lebanon War, was characterized by relative stability on the Lebanese
front. This quiet is for the benefit of residents on both sides,” Manelis wrote.
“The fact that northern Israel and southern Lebanon have children who have not
heard an alarm in their lives is a significant achievement of the Second Lebanon
War, and the best proof of the stability of Israeli deterrence and the burning
memory among the Lebanese about the magnitude of Nasrallah's previous mistake.”
Nevertheless according to IDF assessments, Hezbollah has since rebuilt its
arsenal with at least 100,000 short-range rockets and several thousand more
missiles that can reach central Israel. In addition to a massive arsenal of
rockets and missiles, Hezbollah is able to mobilize close to 30,000 fighters and
has flouted its tunnel system, complete with ventilation, electricity, and
rocket launchers.
Hezbollah has also increased its military capabilities due to its fighting in
Syria on the side of President Bashar Assad, and has spread its troops across
the entire Middle East.
“The past year has been further proof that Hezbollah serves as an operational
arm of Iran. In every place where there was instability, we discovered the
fingerprint of Iran and everywhere we discovered Hezbollah's involvement,”
Manelis wrote.
Some 200 villages in south Lebanon have also been turned into “military
strongholds” from which Hezbollah militants are able to watch Israeli soldiers
at any moment.
“The ordinary citizen will be mistaken to think that this process turns Lebanon
into a fortress, it is nothing more than a barrel of gunpowder on which he, his
family and his property are sitting,” Manelis said in his op-ed on Sunday.
“One in every three or four houses in southern Lebanon is a headquarters, a
post, a weapons depot or a Hezbollah hideout. We know these assets and know how
to attack them accurately if required.”
Israeli officials have repeatedly voiced concerns over the smuggling of
sophisticated weaponry to Hezbollah and the growing Iranian presence on its
borders, stressing that both are red-lines for the Jewish State.
Senior officials from Israel’s defense establishment have repeatedly stated that
while the chance of escalation on the border is low, the smallest incident or a
miscalculation by either side has the possibility to lead to conflict.
“The future of Lebanese citizens is in the hands of a dictator who sits in
Tehran,” Manelis wrote, adding that “I think it is right to warn the residents
of Lebanon of the Iranian game in their security and in their future.”
In September, Israel carried out its largest military exercise on the northern
border in 20 years with tens of thousands of soldiers from all branches of the
army simulating a war with Hezbollah.
“The past year has been used by the IDF to significantly improve preparations
for war on the northern front,” Manelis wrote. “If our enemies understood how
much we knew about them, they would be deterred from entering into another
conflict for many more years to come.”
http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/IDF-Spokesman-warns-Lebanon-of-war-with-Israel-if-Iranian-presence-grows-540009?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=28-1-2018&utm_content=idf-spokesman-warns-lebanon-of-war-with-israel-if-iranian-presence-grows-540009
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News
published on January 28-29/18
Syria Kurds Say Won't Join Sochi Peace Talks
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 28/18/Authorities in Syria's Kurdish
autonomous region said on Sunday they would not attend peace talks in Russia's
Sochi next week because of Turkey's offensive against the Kurdish enclave of
Afrin. "We said before that if the situation remained the same in Afrin we could
not attend Sochi," regional official Fawza al-Yussef said. Rebel backer Turkey
is one of the sponsors of the talks in the Black Sea resort on Monday and
Tuesday, along with Damascus allies Russia and Iran.Turkey's military offensive
in Afrin "contradicts the principle of political dialogue," Yussef said.
Turkey launched operation "Olive Branch" on January 20 against the Syrian
Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) militia in Afrin, supporting Syrian
opposition fighters with ground troops and air strikes. Ankara says the YPG is a
"terrorist" offshoot of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which is
proscribed as a terror group by Ankara and its Western allies. The Sochi talks
come after multiple failed rounds of U.N.-brokered talks to end Syria's
seven-year war. On Saturday, Syria's main opposition group, the Syrian
Negotiation Commission, also said it would not attend the negotiations. More
than 340,000 people have been killed and millions displaced since Syria's war
began in 2011. The conflict began with the brutal repression of anti-government
protests, but has since evolved into a complex war including jihadists and
foreign powers.
Pressing Syria Offensive, Turkey Urges U.S.
Pullback
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 28/18/Turkey has urged the United States
to withdraw personnel from a Kurdish-held town in northern Syria after
Washington told Ankara it would stop arming a Syrian Kurdish militia that Turkey
is fighting. As Turkey's offensive in Syria entered its second week with new air
strikes and artillery, Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said it was "necessary
for them (U.S.) to immediately withdraw from Manbij", where Washington has a
military presence. Turkey launched operation "Olive Branch" on January 20
against the Syrian Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) militia in its
western enclave of Afrin, supporting Syrian opposition fighters with ground
troops and air strikes. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has threatened to expand
the offensive against the YPG to Manbij, east of Afrin. Relations between NATO
allies Ankara and Washington have worsened since Turkey launched an operation,
with the United States urging restraint and fearing an impact on the fight
against the Islamic State (IS) extremist group. One of the issues marring
relations was the U.S. supplying the YPG militia -- which has spearheaded the
anti-jihadist fight -- with arms since last year in battles against IS.
Like a steamroller'
Manbij itself was retaken from IS by the Kurdish-led, U.S.-backed Syrian
Democratic Forces in 2016 as part of a push that would later recapture the city
of Raqa from the jihadists. The Turkish presidency said U.S. National Security
Advisor H.R. McMaster "confirmed" to Erdogan's spokesman Ibrahim Kalin in a
phone call late Friday that Washington would no longer "give weapons to the
YPG."Ankara says the YPG is a "terrorist" offshoot of the outlawed Kurdistan
Workers' Party (PKK) which is proscribed as a terror group by Ankara and its
Western allies. "God willing we will crush them (terror groups) like a
steamroller," Erdogan said Saturday during a speech in Istanbul.Turkish Prime
Minister Binali Yildirim hit out at critics, explaining the "operation was not
an option but a necessity".
Cut ties with YPG'
Earlier this month, the U.S.-led coalition fighting IS said it was working to
create a 30,000-strong border security force in northern Syria. "The U.S. must
cut its ties with a terror organisation. It must take back the weapons it has
given," Cavusoglu said, adding Turkey "now wanted to see concrete steps taken".
During their call, McMaster and Kalin agreed to coordinate closely in order to
prevent misunderstandings. The contact came just days after Washington and
Ankara bitterly contested each other's accounts of a telephone conversation
between Erdogan and U.S. President Donald Trump. A White House statement said
Trump urged Turkey to "limit its military actions", but a Turkish official said
this was not an accurate reflection of the leaders' call. There have also been
expressions of concern over the offensive from other Western allies including
the European Union. German police on Saturday ordered the dispersal of a protest
against the offensive attended by over 15,000 in Cologne because of the presence
of PKK symbols, banned in Germany.
Syrian rebels 'take village'
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group told AFP the fighting
was concentrated in the northwest part of the Afrin region. Turkish forces and
allied Syrian rebels had taken a village and were making progress, albeit
"slowly because of bad weather", Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman said. An AFP
correspondent in the Syrian town of Azaz held by pro-Ankara fighters, east of
Afrin, could hear sporadic artillery fire. The Turkish military said "at least
394 terrorist organization members were neutralised" in the operation while two
if its own soldiers had been killed on Saturday, bringing the total to five,
with 40 more injured. The Observatory said 111 Ankara-backed rebels and Kurdish
fighters have been killed since last Saturday. It said 38 civilians have also
been killed, mainly as a result of Turkish shelling, but Ankara strongly rejects
such claims. Health workers in Afrin told AFP they feared the offensive would
lead to a humanitarian "tragedy". "Medication and humanitarian aid necessary to
help civilians will soon run out," said Khalil Sabri Ahmed, head of the main
hospital in Afrin. The U.N. children's agency UNICEF said at least 11 children
have been killed since the operation began. Turkey's AFAD emergencies agency
head Mehmet Gulluoglu said they were making plans for a camp to be established
in Azaz "in the face of a possible refugee influx from Afrin."Several Kurdish
parties in Syria, including the Democratic Union Party (PYD), the political
branch of the YPG, on Saturday called on the international community and Syrian
forces to "apply pressure by all available means" to stop Turkey's offensive.
Navalny Arrested as Thousands Rally against
Putin and 'Pseudo-Polls'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 28/18/Russian police on Sunday detained
opposition leader Alexei Navalny in Moscow as thousands rallied across the
country against a March election expected to extend Vladimir Putin's Kremlin
term. Heeding a call by Putin's bete noire, thousands braved freezing
temperatures to stage rallies in dozens of cities to protest upcoming
"pseudo-elections," as Navalny and his supporters refer to them. In Moscow,
Navalny chanted "Swindlers and thieves" at a rally in the city centre before
several police officers pounced on the 41-year-old opposition politician,
knocking him to the ground and dragging him on to a bus. Authorities said
Navalny would be charged with organising an unpermitted protest, adding he had
been taken to a police station. The opposition leader urged Muscovites not to
give up.
"You are not rallying for me, but for yourselves and your future," he tweeted.
'Down with the czar'
About 4,000 people turned up for the unsanctioned rally in Moscow, with many
chanting "Down with the czar" and brandishing placards saying "Voters'
strike."Authorities beefed up security, dispatching police vans and passenger
buses to the city centre, but police largely refrained from arresting
protesters. A crowd of protesters was later allowed to walk down to Red Square.
One group of protesters walked several kilometres and reached the government
headquarters as police watched on. Authorities estimated the Moscow turnout at
around 1,000 people. Ahead of the Moscow rally police broke into Navalny's
headquarters using a power saw, interrupting a live broadcast covering protests
in the east of the country. Police also detained several members of Navalny's
team.
'Not scared'
More than 250 people were detained across the country, according to OVD-Info, an
independent monitor. Sunday's turnout paled in comparison to last year's
protests when tens of thousands demonstrated against corruption among Russia's
elite in March and June, 2017. Police unleashed a severe crackdown afterwards,
arresting more than 1,000 people including schoolchildren. Navalny himself
served three jail sentences of 15 days, 25 days and 20 days for organising
unauthorised protests last year. But many protesters said Sunday authorities
would not intimidate them. "These are not elections because we already know the
result," Elena Ruzhe, 62, told AFP in Moscow. "I'm not scared to protest," added
the former culture ministry worker.
Protester Alexandra Fedorova, who wore a fur coat, said it was wrong not to let
Navalny take part in the vote. "I don't see a future. There is nobody to vote
for," the 27-year-old said.
'I want change'
Protesters expressed similar sentiments in the second city of Saint Petersburg
where around 1,500 people rallied, some chanting "Russia without Putin" and
"Putin is a thief." "I want change," Andrei Petrov, 20, told AFP in the former
imperial capital. "We are tired of living in this quagmire." Earlier in the day
opposition supporters protested in far eastern Russia and Siberia, including in
the northern city of Yakutsk where people rallied despite temperatures of around
minus 45 Celsius (minus 49 Fahrenheit). In the Ural city of Yekaterinburg,
around 1,000 people turned up, with the city's mayor joining the crowd.
"What we are being offered now is not an election," the outspoken mayor, Yevgeny
Roizman, told the gathering. Navalny -- seen as the only politician with enough
stamina to take on Putin -- has built a robust protest movement, tapping into
the anger of a younger generation yearning for change. He says the upcoming
election will be little more than a coronation of Putin who is expected to win a
fourth presidential term, becoming the longest-serving Russian leader since
Stalin. Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov warned unsanctioned rallies would lead
to "certain consequences" -- a thinly-veiled promise of punishment.
Last year Navalny mounted a forceful bid to run for president but officials
ruled him ineligible due to a criminal conviction which he says is politically
motivated. Navalny has said he would use the full force of his campaign --
including over 200,000 volunteers -- to organise "voters' strikes" and encourage
Russians to stay away from polling stations on election day. After 18 years of
leadership, both as president and prime minister, Putin fatigue is spreading
across Russia. But the post-Soviet turbulence of the 1990s remains deeply
ingrained in Russia's collective psyche, making many reluctant to take to the
streets, observers say.
Yemen's Southern Separatists: Thirsting for Lost
Independence
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 28/18/Yemen's Prime Minister Ahmed bin
Dagher on Sunday accused southern separatists of attempting a coup in the
interim capital of Aden after they took over the government headquarters.The
premier called on the Saudi-led coalition fighting Iran-backed Huthi rebels to
intervene after fierce clashes.Here is some background on the latest twist in
Yemen's tangled conflict:
Two become one
South Yemen was an independent state -- with former British colony Aden as its
capital -- from its formation in 1967 until 1990, when it was unified with North
Yemen under northern leader Ali Abdullah Saleh. Four years later, it launched a
separatist rebellion which culminated in its occupation by northern forces.
The scars of that war are still widely felt, feeding separatist sentiment.
Power vacuum
In the chaos that has followed the ouster of Saleh by protests in 2011, southern
separatists have bolstered the forces of internationally recognized President
Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi in the battle against the Huthis and loyalists of the
now-dead strongman. In March 2015, the Huthis advanced on second city Aden,
where Hadi had taken refuge after escaping house arrest in the capital Sanaa.
But the Saudi-led coalition helped pro-Hadi forces push the rebels out of Aden
in July that year, as well as from four other provinces.
Hadi loyalists have been boosted by the Popular Resistance alliance of southern
separatists and tribesmen who took up arms after the rebels advanced on their
regions. The separatists have long called for the secession of the formerly
independent South Yemen, and their support for Hadi has been far from
unconditional.
South Transition Council
Sunday's violence came after protests called by the South Transition Council, an
autonomous body aimed at overseeing self-governance among southern provinces.
The 26-member council, which is not recognized by Hadi's government, includes
the governors of five southern provinces and two cabinet ministers. Former Aden
governor Aidarous al-Zoubeidi formed the council last May after Hadi fired him
the previous month.Hadi sacked Zoubeidi along with cabinet minister Hani bin
Breik, in a move widely seen as reflecting divisions among his supporters. The
two men played key roles in restoring security to Aden and adjacent provinces
after the Huthi push.The sidelined southern leaders are supported by the United
Arab Emirates, a key member of the Saudi-led coalition that backs Hadi. The UAE
has financed, armed and trained southern security forces that fought against
jihadists in the region and which have also been accused by rights groups of a
raft of abuses. The Saudi-led coalition has called for calm and restraint from
"all Yemeni political and social components."
Yemen Govt. Warns of Coup as Separatists Take
Over Headquarters
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January
28/18/Yemen's government accused southern separatists of an attempted coup on
Sunday after they took over its headquarters amid fierce clashes in the city of
Aden. The fighting, which killed at least 15 people, threw war-torn Yemen into
further chaos and threatened to undermine President Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi, who
ordered his forces to stand down. Security sources and residents said clashes
appeared to have spread to most of the city, with reports of running gun
battles. The government urged the Saudi-led military coalition, which has been
supporting Hadi against Iran-backed Huthi rebels in control of much of the
north, to intervene. The southern separatists -- who want the return of an
independent state that ended with Yemen's unification in 1990 -- backed Hadi's
government against the Huthis but tensions between the two sides had been on the
rise."A coup is ongoing here in Aden against legitimacy and the country's
unity," Prime Minister Ahmed bin Dagher said in a statement. Shortly afterwards,
it was reported loyalist commanders had received orders from the president to
put down their weapons. "After talks with the Arab coalition... you must order
all military units to cease fire immediately," a government statement said. On
Sunday afternoon, coalition planes were seen flying over the city. Security
sources told AFP that pro-separatist units trained and backed by the United Arab
Emirates had taken over the government headquarters in Aden after clashes. The
15 people killed included three civilians, hospital sources said. Dozens more
were wounded. Saudi and Emirati troops present in Aden did not intervene in the
clashes, security sources said. The fighting erupted after separatist protestors
were prevented from entering the city for a rally to demand the government's
ouster in Aden, established as its interim base after the Iran-backed Huthis
seized control of the capital Sanaa in 2014.
Schools, airport closed
The coalition, which launched its intervention against the rebels in March 2015,
had urged restraint ahead of the planned protest. It called on all sides to
"adhere to the language of calm dialogue", according to a statement cited late
Saturday by Saudi state news agency SPA. Universities, schools and the only
international airport in the city had all been closed, according to witnesses.
The U.N. children's agency UNICEF said on Twitter it was "very concerned about
the situation in Aden." Dagher said that events in Aden were headed towards
"total military confrontation" and urged members of the coalition, in particular
the United Arab Emirates, to take action. The premier also warned that
separating south Yemen from the rest of the country would benefit Iran and the
Huthis. "Iran is trying to consolidate its presence in Yemen through the Huthis
and by splitting Yemen, we are giving them one-third of the land and
three-quarters of the population," Dagher said. Sunday's rally was called by the
Southern Transitional Council, an autonomous body aimed at overseeing
self-governance among southern provinces. The 26-member council, which is not
recognised by Hadi's government, includes the governors of five southern
provinces and two cabinet ministers. Former Aden governor Aidarous al-Zoubeidi
formed the council in May after Hadi fired him the previous month. The council
had asked Hadi to make changes in the government and gave him one week to do so
-- a deadline that expired on Sunday.
Long campaign for secession
It had warned that if Hadi did not accept the demand, its supporters would begin
a protest campaign to oust Dagher's government. The separatists have long
campaigned for the secession of southern Yemen. South Yemen was an independent
state -- with former British colony Aden as its capital -- from its formation in
1967 until 1990, when it was unified with North Yemen under northern leader Ali
Abdullah Saleh. Four years later, it launched a separatist rebellion that
culminated in its occupation by northern forces. The Huthis, a northern Shiite
minority, seized Sanaa in September 2014 with the help of Saleh and army units
loyal to him. In March 2015, the rebels advanced on Aden, where Hadi took refuge
after escaping house arrest in the capital. But the Saudi-led coalition helped
pro-Hadi forces push the rebels out of Aden in July that year, as well as from
four other provinces. Hadi loyalists have been boosted by the Popular Resistance
alliance of southern separatists and tribesmen who took up arms after the rebels
advanced on their regions. Years of U.N.-backed peace efforts have failed to
resolve Yemen's conflict, which has killed more than 9,200 people and devastated
a country already among the poorest in the region. The Huthis have increasingly
consolidated their grip on Sanaa and the north, especially since rebel gunmen
killed Saleh in December after their alliance collapsed.
Cyprus Votes for President with Eyes on New
Peace Push
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 28/18/Voters in Cyprus headed to the polls
Sunday for a presidential election that could determine if the divided island
makes another push to reunite after the collapse of talks last year. After a
lacklustre campaign, opinion polls put conservative incumbent Nicos Anastasiades,
71, ahead as he pledges to restart negotiations with the Turkish-backed north
quickly after the vote. The former lawyer -- under the slogan "Steady Steps
Forward" -- has taken credit for an impressive recovery by the European Union's
most easterly member since a debilitating financial crisis in 2013. But apathy
appears to be growing and Anastasiades seems unlikely to win outright in the
first round. He is expected to face a February 4 run-off against either dovish
communist-backed Stavros Malas or Nikolas Papadopoulos, a former president's son
who takes a tougher line on peace efforts. "The economy is doing reasonably well
-- but for me the main criterion is still the Cyprus problem," said university
lecturer Andres Karageorghis after casting his ballot at a school in Nicosia.
"To carry on and hopefully find a solution." If the first round is not decisive
there is set to be intense horse-trading, and analysts say a backroom deal
between the opponents of Anastasiades could still deny him a second and final
five-year term.
Reunification prospects
As always, the nearly 44-year division of the island between the internationally
recognized Greek-majority Republic of Cyprus and a Turkish Cypriot statelet in
the north looms large. In July, two years of U.N.-backed talks between
Anastasiades and Turkish Cypriot leader Mustafa Akinci came closer than ever to
reunifying the island but collapsed in acrimony before a deal. Despite the
failure to bridge key issues, including the future of tens of thousands of
Turkish troops in the north, Anastasiades insists he wants talks with Akinci to
restart soon. But there is deep scepticism among the international community
over whether there is the political will to make a breakthrough. During the
campaign Anastasiades was attacked for being either too pliant or not keen
enough to seal a deal. Retired treasury worker George Georgallides said he voted
for more hardline Papadopoulos because he felt "Anastasiades gave up everything"
at the negotiations. "If we do restart talks then it needs to be from the very
beginning again," he said. Signs are that the road to reunification will only
get tougher as fatigue mounts after decades of failure. For the first time
ultra-nationalist party ELAM -- fiercely opposed to the proposed reunification
-- is fielding a candidate.
Economic focus
While the "national problem" is ever present, this time around the economy has
been a dominant issue. When Anastasiades took over, the banking sector was in
meltdown and he took a 10-billion-euro (more than $12-billion) bailout that
entailed biting austerity measures. That included a drastic haircut on accounts
of over 100,000 euros held in the country's biggest lender, Bank of Cyprus.
Since then the economy has rebounded faster than many expected and growth has
been steady since 2015. Tourism reached a record high last year and explorations
are going on for oil and gas offshore. But analysts warn there are major
challenges left. The economy is still smaller than it was before the crisis,
unemployment is around 11 percent and banks are awash with bad loans.
"The recovery is relative," said Fiona Mullen, director of Cyprus-based Sapienta
Economics. Polls close at 1600 GMT with final results expected late Sunday.
Kabul on High Alert after Ambulance Bomb Toll Tops 100
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 28/18/Afghanistan Sunday
declared a day of national mourning as the toll for those killed by a huge bomb
hidden in an ambulance in Kabul topped 100 people, sharply raising tensions
after insurgents struck in the city for the second time in a week. At least 103
people were killed and 235 wounded in Saturday's lunchtime attack claimed by the
Taliban, which caused panic in the war-torn capital and overwhelmed its
hospitals. Kabul remained on high alert as the presidential palace declared a
national day of mourning for Sunday, with flags flying at half-mast. The attack
was one of the worst to strike the capital in recent years. Central Kabul was
unusually quiet on Sunday, a normal workday in Afghanistan, with little traffic
and few people on the street. In contrast, security checkpoints have been beefed
up, particularly in the streets near the blast scene, as the city braced for the
possibility of further violence. A security alert issued on Sunday warned that
the Islamic State group -- which claimed a deadly attack on Save the Children's
office in Afghanistan's east on Wednesday -- was planning to attack supermarkets
and shops in Kabul frequented by foreigners. U.S. President Donald Trump called
for "decisive action" against the Taliban over the assault as other
international leaders also condemned the attack. Afghan authorities gave an
updated toll Sunday for those killed and maimed in the huge blast.
"Unfortunately a number of wounded people have died in hospital. The number of
martyrs is now 103 and wounded is 235," Interior Minister Wais Barmak told
reporters. Health ministry spokesman Waheed Majroh told reporters earlier Sunday
that most of the injured were men.
'We are so heartbroken'
Ordinary Afghans took to social media to express their anguish and sorrow at
rapidly worsening security as the Taliban and IS militants step up attacks on
Kabul, turning it into one of the deadliest places in Afghanistan for civilians.
"We are so heartbroken in Kabul that we don't know how to start our new day,"
Freshta Karim wrote on Twitter. "Shall we stay home or go to work, shall we meet
our friends and cry or shall we force ourselves to create an illusion of hope?
How are you starting your day in Kabul?" Naser Danesh tweeted: "In Kabul
starting a day without explosion, it would be a surprise. One could only imagine
that kind of a day." On Facebook, Naweed Qaderi wrote: "It is a big shame for
the government, they repeatedly fail to protect people. The leaders must lose a
son or daughter to feel the pain of poor people." The blast happened in a
crowded area of the city where several high-profile organizations including the
European Union have offices. The force of the explosion shook the windows of
buildings hundreds of meters away and caused some low-rise structures in the
immediate vicinity to collapse. The scene of the attack was scattered with body
parts, blood and debris. Children were among the wounded.
Foreigners leaving
The government has blamed the Taliban-affiliated Haqqani Network, which Afghan
and Western officials suspect of involvement in at least some of the recent
attacks in the capital. The suicide bomber passed through at least one
checkpoint in the ambulance, saying he was taking a patient to Jamhuriat
hospital, an interior ministry spokesman said Saturday. "At the second
checkpoint he was recognized and blew (up) his explosive-laden car," Nasrat
Rahimi said. Rahimi told a news conference later that most of the victims were
civilians. Four suspects had been arrested. The attack came exactly a week after
Taliban insurgents stormed Kabul's landmark Intercontinental hotel and killed at
least 25 people, the majority foreigners. But there is still confusion over the
true toll from that attack with conflicting figures given by officials and
Afghan media reporting higher numbers. Some foreign organizations are
reassessing their presence in Afghanistan following the spate of deadly
violence. The Aga Khan Foundation is moving its foreign staff out of the
country, several sources told AFP. At least one Western humanitarian group is
relocating its foreign staff to other cities in Afghanistan, a source said.
Abbas :'Oslo Accords are Dead'
Ramallah - Kifah Ziboun/Asharq Al
Awsat/January 28/18/Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, speaking with
Meretz party leader Zehava Galon, said that the Palestinian authority didn’t
drop the negotiations options although “the Oslo Accords are dead.” “We are
prepared for negotiations, and we never intended to leave the talks, but
regrettably no one is offering us talks, especially not the Americans, who now
wish to punish us," he added. Abbas said US President Donald Trump had, in
several past conversations, “promised a good deal to resolve the conflict, and
then came this unfortunate surprise, which we cannot accept.” He reiterated that
due to Trump’s decision regarding Jerusalem, the US can no longer be a mediator.
Galon and Abbas agreed that the US and Israeli right-wing will lead the region
to catastrophic and violent outcomes that might strengthen the loss of trust
between Palestinians and Israelis. He added that the two-state solution is the
only possible solution, but there is no courageous leadership in Israel to
achieve that. According to Israeli reports, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu is seeking to get a pledge from Trump administration to cancel the
idea of the Palestinian refugees right to get back. Channel 2 said that this
approach coincides with the time when the Palestinian authority is stressing
this right, on the side. Palestinians seek to find a new mechanism to sponsor a
new political process. Abbas discussed in Brussels last week with the EU foreign
ministers an international multilateral framework that includes five to seven
states. Other ideas were discussed such as launching a new international
conference for peace that would result in this new mechanism. However, no
practical steps were taken as the Israeli PM insists on the US as the sole
mediator.
Saudi Arabia: Corruption-related Settlements File in its Final Stages
Riyadh - /Asharq Al Awsat/January
28/18/The anti-corruption campaign in Saudi Arabia is coming to an end after a
number of those summoned by the Supreme Committee to Combat Corruption returned
to their homes, including those who had been accused of corruption, witnesses
and those with relevant information. Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, owner of the
Kingdom Holding, returned home after being summoned by the Public Prosecution,
Reuters reported. He arrived to his home Saturday morning, a source from his
family members told the agency. News circulated recently stated that the
investigation period was over, after several former officials and businessmen
had been seen back in their homes through images that went viral on social
media. In a 30 minutes Televised interview with Reuters, Prince Al Waleed bin
Talal said: “I have nothing to hide at all. I'm so comfortable, I'm like at
home, frankly speaking.”The interview included a tour in his suite. The prince
said one of the main reasons for granting the interview was to disprove rumors
that he was mistreated and that he had been transferred from the hotel to
prison. The prince said he was able to communicate with family members and
executives at his business during his time of investigation. He also
highlighted all comfort amenities that were available to him, including a
private office, dining room and kitchen, which was fully stocked with his
preferred vegetarian meals. A television played business news programs, and a
mug with an image of his own face on it was perched on the desk. After freedom,
the prince said, he plans to continue living in Saudi Arabia and getting back to
run his business. "I will not leave Saudi Arabia, for sure. This is my country."
Kabul bombing death toll rises to 103, with 235 wounded
Sun 28 Jan 2018/NNA
- The death toll from yesterday's attack in the Afghan capital Kabul in which a
bomb was hidden in an ambulance before blowing up near government buildings has
reached 103, according to officials. The bombing,
which occurred in a crowded area of the city centre, has also left another 235
people injured, officials said. "Unfortunately a number of wounded people have
died in hospital. The number of martyrs is now 103," interior minister Wais
Barmak said, adding that another 235 were wounded. The
Afghan government has accused Pakistan of providing support for the militants
who carried out the attack. It said the attack was carried out by the
Taliban-linked Haqqani network with Pakistani backing. Islamabad has always
denied supporting Afghan militants. Security officials have also warned that
more attacks are possible. The attack was claimed by the Taliban, a week after
they claimed a deadly attack on the city's Intercontinental Hotel.
It was the worst attack seen in the Afghan capital since a truck bomb
near the German embassy killed 150 people in May. After a deadly week in which
an office of the aid group Save the Children in the eastern city of Jalalabad
was also attacked, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani's Western-backed government has
faced growing pressure to improve security. Despite a
major tightening in checks following the 31 May attack, the ambulance which was
packed with explosives for this latest attack was able to get through the
checkpoints. The attack, described as "an atrocity" by the head of the UN
mission in Afghanistan, drew universal condemnation from allies and neighbouring
countries. US President Donald Trump, who last year sent more American troops to
Afghanistan and ordered an increase in airstrikes and other assistance to Afghan
forces, said the attack "renews our resolve and that of our Afghan partners".
He called "decisive action" against the Taliban following the attack.
US officials have said that the new strategy is putting pressure on the
Taliban. Following a recent visit to Kabul, the US
ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said the strategy was working and
pushing the insurgents closer to peace talks. However, the Taliban have
dismissed any suggestion that they have been weakened by the US approach and say
they will only agree to talks when international forces leave Afghanistan. The
attack, in one of the most heavily protected parts of the city, close to foreign
embassies and government buildings, demonstrated that their ability to mount
deadly high profile attacks that undermine confidence in the government remains
undiminished. --- RTE
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from
miscellaneous sources published on January 28-29/18
US, the Rule of Law
Noah Feldman/Bloomberg/January
28/18
Whether prosecutors and FBI agents are allowed to have political views is a
question now of interest on both sides of the political spectrum. Liberals are
outraged that President Donald Trump asked Andrew McCabe, then acting director
of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, who he had voted for when they met last
May in the Oval Office. Conservatives are angry about anti-Trump text messages
sent by an FBI agent who was working for the special counsel’s investigation.
The answer turns out to be complicated. Traditionally, the modern American
solution has been to allow and expect prosecutors and police to have split
personalities. Professionally, they are supposed to be nonpartisan and
objective. Privately, they are allowed to believe whatever they want and
exercise their First Amendment rights to discuss politics with their friends and
neighbors, and to vote.
This compromise comes from distinctly American logic. Although the Constitution
places law enforcement squarely under the executive branch, the US has long
recognized that the rule of law would be badly eroded if investigative and
prosecutorial decisions were made on the basis of partisanship. Rather than
changing the Constitution to create truly independent police and prosecutors,
the way most other liberal democracies do, the US has made due with strong
unwritten norms that demand the depoliticization of criminal justice. At the
same time, the American tradition of individual constitutional liberties has
served to protect the private political expression of everyone, including civil
servants. The judicial doctrine surrounding freedom of speech by government
employees embodies this ideal: They enjoy free speech unless they are speaking
or acting in their official capacities. Then, they have to act in accordance
with their job requirements, which might include refraining from political
speech.
Coincidently, from a strictly legal perspective, it shouldn’t matter what
opinions FBI agent Peter Strzok expressed about Trump or Hillary Clinton in his
private communications. He wasn’t acting in his official capacity, and he’s free
to express any view at all in his private one. What’s more, Trump had every
legal right to ask McCabe about his vote. The director of the FBI is a
presidential appointee, and so the president is entitled to determine whether
the director’s views match the president’s. The problem with the split
personality model is that whatever its theoretical appeal, it’s not very
satisfying. With today’s extreme partisanship and polarization, who really
believes that private politics do not effect public duties? We tend to approach
public servants -- and maybe everyone -- with what is sometimes called a
hermeneutic of suspicion: We automatically suspect that public neutrality may be
masking private political preferences.
There’s an answer available, adopted by some other democracies: insisting that
civil servants give up their private politics all together. We could create a
new norm according to which anyone who investigates or prosecutes should refrain
from discussing politics at any time, and with anyone.
The justification would be to assure the successful working of the justice
system. When police are privately racists, the justice system cannot function.
That was one important lesson of the O.J. Simpson trial, when detective Mark
Furman’s racism made the investigation seem suspect to many black Americans.
Similarly, we could argue that the manifestation of political opinions by
investigators leads to public doubt about the veracity of their investigations.
This approach would sacrifice the private speech of police and investigators. To
become an official rule, it would require a change in constitutional doctrine.
If, however, it were merely an unwritten norm, it would not violate the
constitution. It would, rather, become a useful reality -- similar to the
unwritten norm that investigators themselves shouldn’t be politicized. In a
perfect, or at least less partisan world, none of this would be necessary. It
would be nice if the public could genuinely accept that well-trained
professionals could separate the personal from the political. But that utopia
seems far-fetched. In the world we have, we seem to be moving toward a demand
for complete personal neutrality in our civil servants. If that is necessary to
sustain trust in the rule of law, then the sacrifice may well be worth it.
Russian Bots Are Right: Releasethememo
Eli Lake/Bloomberg/January
28/18
I agree with the Kremlin. Congress should #releasethememo, as they say on
Russian Twitter. Vladimir Putin is dead wrong on Olympic drug testing, Crimean
independence and Syrian genocide. But his bots have a point when it comes to the
House Intelligence Committee. For the uninitiated, Republican staff members on
that committee drafted a summary of material turned over from the FBI and
Department of Justice. This document reportedly alleges abuses in how the
government wire-tapped Donald Trump's associates. Republican members who have
seen the memo have told reporters it's worse than Watergate.
The committee's Democrats tell us not to believe them. They asked Twitter to
investigate whether an army of Russian trolls helped promote the popular #releasethememo
hash tag. They have drafted their own classified memo to counter the Republican
one. All of this, they say, is just an effort to discredit the real
investigation into Russian collusion. So how do we find out who's telling the
truth? Release both memos. I suspect we won't find evidence an American STASI
took over the J. Edgar Hoover building. But Republicans have a point that there
has been a lot of selective leaking about this probe for more than a year. Put
the facts on the record and let the public decide. While we're at it, the
committee should report to the public on the Barack Obama administration's
policy on unmasking redacted names of Americans swept up in signal intelligence.
Remember when the chairman of the committee, Devin Nunes, made allegations of
illicit activities last year? Let's see the evidence. And don't stop there. The
White House should release the transcript of the December 2016 communication
between Trump's first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, and Russian
ambassador Sergei Kislyak. Did Flynn promise to lift the sanctions on Russia
that Obama imposed a month before he left office? That's what the Democrats say.
Let's find out.
Likewise, the Justice Department's inspector general should fully explain what
agent Peter Sztrok meant in a text message sent before the election mentioning
an "insurance policy" that had been discussed in the office of deputy FBI
director Andrew McCabe. And the FBI should let us know who leaked Flynn's
monitored conversations in the first place.The republic is in great need of
sunshine at the moment, particularly when it comes to Trump and Russia. Most of
what we know about all of this is the result of selective disclosures. We get
allegations, hearsay and process from current and former national security
officials and members of Congress. They hint. They whisper. We're not authorized
to see the evidence they've seen. So we end up in a state of suspended
speculation. Enough.
Now of course it's true there are some government secrets worth keeping, like
the identities of overseas agents or planned troop movements in a war. But the
Trump-Russia story is a study in excessive secrecy. Usually the argument against
excessive state secrecy is that it allows the government to hide its own abuse
of power. And while that's true, another danger is that all these official
secrets debase the discourse. Officials with security clearances influence
public policy without the burden of proof. After all, it's classified. Both
sides do it. In the last year this tactic has become a specialty of Obama alumni
who have implied -- without supporting evidence -- that Trump officials were
suborned by Russian agents. See former CIA director John Brennan's congressional
testimony from last May, saying unknown Trump associates had been witting or
unwitting cooperators with these Russian influencers.
Trump does his own version of this shtick. He acts like a passive observer in
his own government, tweeting accusations that the FBI has been spying on him,
all while having the power to declassify the documents that would prove his
allegations. We saw this last week at the House Intelligence Committee.
Republican members tell us how shocked they are to learn what they can't really
tell us.
You've likely heard this complaint about Nunes. In the last year, the
committee's chairman has gotten more bad press than an oil spill. His Democratic
counterpart, Adam Schiff, also likes to talk about what he knows but cannot say.
Schiff, though, gets a pass from most of the media. Remember last March when he
told MSNBC that he had seen "more than circumstantial evidence" of the Trump
campaign's collusion with Russia during the 2016 campaign. That set off a whirr
at the time. It's been nearly a year, where is it? Last month Schiff tried to
back up these claims. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed piece he tied together some
of what we do know about Trump and Russia: that Russians approached Donald Trump
Jr. promising to distort Hillary Clinton's image; that Flynn discussed sanctions
with Kislyak; and that Kremlin-associated figures had also approached a
low-level staffer, George Papadopoulos. All of this added together is
suggestive, but it remains firmly circumstantial. Schiff would probably say I
sound like a Russian hashtag. "The Russians, who are pushing the campaign to
declassify this information through its social media bots and trolls, will no
doubt be thrilled" if the Republican memo is made public, Schiff warned
Wednesday. But he added, if that were to happen, "we would have to insist that
our memorandum be likewise made public so that the entire nation is not then
misled.”
In other words: #releasebothmemos. Sounds like a good start to me.
Belgium: How Low Can a Low Country Get?
Bruce Bawer/Gatestone Institute/January 28/18
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11788/belgium-low
French journalist Éric Zemmour
facetiously suggested that France should forget about bombing Raqqa and should
instead bomb Molenbeek.
Even the New York Times, of all places, ran an exposé about the ineffectiveness
of Belgium's anti-terror efforts, pointing up the chronic laxity, buck-passing,
and turf-confusions that characterize every level of its government.
Shut up. Zip it. It is a pathetic and cowardly way of responding to reality, but
it is, alas, a widespread behavior pattern in Western Europe today – and, at
least in certain milieux in poor little Belgium, it has been all but raised to a
sacrament.
In the 15 years that followed the Napoleonic Wars, a messy series of events --
international conferences, great-power land swaps, treaties, riots, military
skirmishes, and, finally, a brief revolution -- resulted in a redrawing of
borders in the Low Countries and the establishment of a new country called
Belgium. Even in the best of times, it was hardly a country, fatally divided
into a French-speaking south and a Flemish-speaking north, whose residents had
little sense of shared identity. If, when the European Union came along, the
Belgians embraced the idea so ardently -- and welcomed the transformation of
their own capital into the capital of the EU -- it was largely because they had
far less of a sense of nationhood than their Western European neighbors, and
felt, or hoped, that the EU would artificially supply something ineffable that
their own history and culture had failed to give them.
Even now, when the citizens of many Western European countries have been brought
up to be ashamed of their national flags, some of these Europeans, at least,
still exhibit intermittent signs of national pride: witness the crowds across
the UK who, every year, sing "God Save the Queen", "Jerusalem", and "Land of
Hope and Glory" during the broadcast of the Last Night of the Proms, or the
spectacle of the French Parliament breaking spontaneously into "La Marseillaise"
after the Charlie Hebdo massacre. Such displays are few and far between in
Belgium. It seems appropriate that, while the official proportions of the
Belgian flag are 13:15, most of the flags flown over government buildings are
2:3. In other words, they do not even bother getting the proportions of their
own flag right.
It has often been pointed out that if Muslims in the West are more passionately
devoted to their own religion, culture, and values than Western infidels are to
the principles that undergird their own civilization, then that civilization is
doomed to fail. In the face of the Islamic threat, of course, there is reason to
be worried about pretty much every nation in Western Europe; but given the
strange hollowness of Belgian identity, Belgium is a place of special concern.
It is not only the location of the headquarters of the EU; it is, to quote the
headline of a March 23, 2016, article by Soeren Kern for Gatestone Institute,
"Why Belgium is Ground Zero for European Jihadis." As it happens, Kern's article
appeared the day after members of ISIS in Brussels committed three suicide
bombings, killing 32 people (not counting three terrorists) and injuring more
than 300.
Four months before that, 137 lives were lost in terrorist attacks on the
Bataclan Theater and other targets in Paris. The perpetrators were soon traced
back to Molenbeek, a majority-Muslim neighborhood in Brussels.
"There is almost always a link with Molenbeek," commented Belgian Prime Minister
Charles Michel. Stefan Frank noted that Molenbeek "is considered Europe's
'terrorist factory.'" And French journalist Éric Zemmour facetiously suggested
that France should forget about bombing Raqqa and should instead bomb Molenbeek.
Riot police guard a road in the Molenbeek district of Brussels, after raids in
which several people, including Salah Abdeslam, one of the perpetrators of the
November 2015 Paris attacks, were arrested on March 18, 2016.
Even the New York Times, of all places, ran an exposé about the ineffectiveness
of Belgium's anti-terror efforts, pointing up the chronic laxity, buck-passing,
and turf confusions that characterize every level of its government.
Of course, terrorism is only the most sensational aspect of the Islamic influx
into Belgium. In December, Belgian author Drieu Godefridi wrote of Brussels as a
city "rapidly descending into chaos and anarchy." November alone saw "three
separate outbreaks of rioting and looting on a major scale," exposing the fact
that "lawlessness... is the new normal in Brussels." Soldiers patrol the
streets, but dare not act: "should a soldier actually hurt a looter, he would
probably be publicly chastised, pilloried by the media, put on trial and
dishonorably discharged." When, during a TV debate, one of the nation's few
straight-talking politicians tried to address the obvious connection between
this rampant disorder and immigration, "the moderator literally yelled at him
that 'Migration is not the subject.... MIGRATION IS NOT THE SUBJECT, STOP!'" and
then handed the floor over to a "slam poet" in an Islamic veil who attributed
the city's problems to its failure to welcome people like herself with open
arms. "The audience was then instructed to applaud her."
Given all this, it should not be surprising that one of the more prominent
voices in Belgium today is that of a foundation, established in 2014, that goes
by the name Ceci n'est pas une crise (CNPC, "This is not a crisis" -- a
deliberate reference to the famous painting Ceci n'est pas un pipe by Belgium's
most famous artist, René Magritte.) Is Belgium in trouble? Is Brussels a
hellhole? Is Molenbeek the ninth circle of hell? Au contraire. As CNPC blithely
puts it, "We are facing a transition to a new social model rather than a
temporary phase of dysfunction." Yes, recent societal changes "have destroyed
many of the structures that shaped our daily lives and formed the foundation of
our identities, leading to a loss of bearings and a sense of anxiety." But while
the "simplistic rhetoric" of "populists" represents this transition as involving
"confrontation" between "us" and the "other," thereby turning us into
nationalists and xenophobes and them into an "enemy," what we should be doing is
letting go of the last vestiges our old society, with traditional "social roles"
and "ways of thinking" and "accepted standards," and learning to cultivate "open
identities" and to "perceive diversity as an enrichment that contributes to the
improvement of our societies."
One CNPC founder, Le Soir cartoonist and TV commentator Pierre Kroll, put it
this way:
"We are living in a time when a constant feeling of crisis, upheaval and
deep-seated change looms large, giving rise to a widespread tendency to mourn
the past and fantasize about a 'comforting' return to rigid values, closed
borders and simplistic rhetoric. Those who know that this 'crisis' is not really
a crisis, that the world will never revert to what it was before (and thankfully
so!), must make these people understand that we need more Europe and not less,
that instead of avoiding each other we must learn to live together, that we have
to be optimistic and determined."
Well, it is always easy to believe that the crisis is not really a crisis when
you are a cultural-elite figure who lives in a safe upscale neighborhood and
whose path never crosses those of women forced into burkas, girls subjected to
FGM and cousin marriages, or "youths" who beat up Jews, bash gays, and harass
their teachers and classmates. How easy it is for privileged folk to preach
diversity to those who live with such mayhem every day!
Who is behind CNPC? Its president, Jean-Pascal Labille, is a former government
minister and professor. Hilariously, despite all the rhetoric about diversity
and even "superdiversity" (a trendy term of which the CNPC is exceedingly fond),
Labille and the twenty other members of CNPC's executive committee are all
ethnic Europeans. Their backgrounds are in sociology, philosophy, economics,
zoology, architecture, business, broadcasting, theater, and politics. A couple
of them are members of the European Parliament. One of them is the brains behind
Belgium's horrific euthanasia law -- the world's most "liberal."
Last year, CNPC conducted an exhaustive survey on Islam, immigration, and
related topics; among the representative findings included in its 141-page
report was that 63% of ethnic Belgians consider Islam a menace to their national
identity, while only 12% see it as a "cultural enrichment." CNPC's conclusion:
Belgians are increasingly fearful, xenophobic, hostile to the "other," and
pathologically awash in "anti-Muslim paranoia."
CNPC does not just carry out studies. It also publishes a magazine which goes by
the simple name Revue. One early article served up a sanguine message: stopping
immigration is not "realistic." Closed borders "undermine...the dream of
universal and inalienable human rights." Believing in nationalism is a
"dangerous fiction." The nation-state? An "anachronism." Revue registered shock
at the Brexit vote. After the election of Donald Trump, whose "eyes look to the
past," Revue found comfort only in the notion that his presidency compels Europe
to "take its destiny into its own hands." In the latest issue, Fatima Zibouh, a
Moroccan-Belgian politician scientist, actually celebrates Molenbeek, arguing
that those who focus on its role as a terrorist factory "misunderstand" its
"many facets," especially its cultural life, which is "characterized as much by
its effervescence as by its diversity." Cultural events, she further notes, are
not just cultural events -- they are "subversive... political tools" that can
help advance the desired societal transition.
Revue has also featured countless articles about "anti-immigrant" and
"anti-Islam" parties in Europe. The one subject it appears never to have
seriously addressed is Islam itself. The cover of one 2016 issue of the magazine
features a four-panel comic strip that is worth pondering. It features two
girls. In the first panel, Girl A says "I'm not racist," then adds "But,"
whereupon Girl B covers Girl A's mouth and says: "Shh." In the last panel, still
covering Girl A's mouth -- quite forcibly, it appears -- Girl B says: "Nothing
good comes after that." Apparently, Girl A was about to point out something she
had observed about her society, even though she knew that some people, fairly or
not, would consider her racist for mentioning it. Whatever that something was,
CNPC agrees with Girl B: best to stay silent. Shut up. Zip it. It is a pathetic
and cowardly way of responding to reality, but it is, alas, a widespread
behavior pattern in Western Europe today -- and, at least in certain milieux in
poor little Belgium, it has been all but raised to a sacrament.
**Bruce Bawer is the author of the new novel The Alhambra (Swamp Fox Editions).
His book While Europe Slept (2006) was a New York Times bestseller and National
Book Critics Circle Award finalist.
© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Living in Pakistan - A Hell for Non-Muslims
Rahat John Austin/ Gatestone Institute/January 28/18
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/62143
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11809/pakistan-non-muslims-hell
In Pakistan, Muslims burn the homes of non-Muslims, burn their places of
worship, burn their holy books, even burn their women and children alive -- and
there is no law or punishment to prevent this criminal behaviour or to make
non-Muslims safe.
Non-Muslim women and children are raped and forcibly converted; this is
considered a religious obligation to please "Allah," the god of Islam. These
taskmasters see themselves as "Soldiers of Allah". Even if a case of "blasphemy"
is not proven against Christians, they still can be killed by an angry mob or
while in police custody. Non-Muslims can also easily be sentenced to death by a
court: even a single claim by Muslim against a non-Muslim is enough to "prove"
him guilty.
Christian leaders and organizations, especially the Pope, have failed to give
any hope to persecuted Christians. Providing a press release or sending a note
is not enough. The Pope truly needs to come to help his flock, to establish
policies to safeguard these persecuted people from the Islamic world.
According to the official results of Pakistan's 2017 census, as of August 25,
2017, the population of Islamic Republic of Pakistan is 207.74 million.
The country is divided into an overwhelmingly Muslim majority of 96.28%; and the
remaining 3.72% are Christian, Bahais, Buddhists, Hindus, Ahmadis, Jains,
Kalasha, Parsis and Sikhs, who are identified as non-Muslim minority Pakistanis.
Religious minorities in the territory of present-day Pakistan, at the time of
the partition of India in 1947, were almost 23% of Pakistan's population. But
instead of their numbers increasing, they have decreased to the current 3.72%.
If the Muslim population has grown, why have non-Muslim minorities not grown
also?
This 23% represents millions of people; how have they vanished?
According to the same census, from 1998 to 2017, Pakistan's overall population
grew by 57%. Presumably, non-Muslim minorities should have increased at the same
rate. Instead, their numbers have dangerously fallen.
The Hindu population, for example, which, according to the 1951 census, was
12.9%, is now only 1.6%.
These numbers begin to reveal the situation of minorities in Pakistan.
If you are a non-Muslim there, that means you have to face and accept
discrimination, lack of religious freedom, and physical and psychological
torture as part of your daily life.
It is routine to hear that some girl from a Christian, Hindu or other minority
community is raped and killed, or has been forcibly converted. A person is
murdered by a mob for alleged blasphemy; some non-Muslim men, women or children
are sentenced to death for a supposed blasphemy they never committed.
Muslims burn their homes, burn places of worship, burn their holy books, even
burn their women and children alive -- and there is no law or punishment to
prevent this criminal behaviour or to make non-Muslims safe. There is no one who
speaks for them. According to Islamic doctrines, the value of a non-Muslim is
that of filth that needs to be cleaned from the earth.
The author is not aware of even a single instance, in the 71 years since the
creation of Pakistan, of someone being punished for killing, burning or raping a
non-Muslim man, woman or child, or for burning their places of worship, their
homes or their holy books.
Hate toward non-Muslims is a part of the school curriculum. Hate is taught in
educational institutions at every level. Children are instructed at an early age
that Christians, Jews and Hindus are the worst creatures and the enemies of
Islam -- so you must grow up and fight against them.
This hate is so deep-rooted that a non-Muslim cannot drink a glass of water from
a public place, or even eat in a restaurant if the people there know what you
are: they think non-Muslims are unclean untouchables and a curse on earth.
People can be killed just for touching a glass of water (see here and here).
Non-Muslims, especially Christians and Hindus, are living a hell on earth.
Non-Muslim women and girls are raped and forcibly converted; this is considered
a religious obligation to please "Allah," the god of Islam.
The situation of minorities in Pakistan is, moreover, getting worse -- a
deterioration which indicates that Pakistan is suffering from the severest
religious extremism. This situation was recently corroborated by reports from
the Pew Research Center and from Open Doors USA.
The reports say that Pakistan is the fourth most dangerous country for
Christians after North Korea, Somalia and Afghanistan.
An overarching problem is that the media and the international community appear
totally to ignore that non-Muslims in Pakistan are suffering severely under the
heavy persecution of society, government and especially blasphemy laws, which
are exorbitantly unfair.
Many Muslim hardline clerics, politicians and even Supreme Court judges often
say -- publicly on national television -- that Pakistan was made "by Muslims and
is only for Muslims," and that there is no place for non-believers.
On August 8, 2017, the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Mian Saqib Nisar, in an
address to the Multan Bar Council, lawyers and the judiciary, said that he hated
Hindus so much that he did not want even to take the names of non-Muslims on his
tongue. His speech was broadcast live on almost all television stations; not a
single channel found fault with his words. Only a few posts on Facebook
indicated that were inappropriate for a person holding one of the highest
offices in the country. So, what kind of justice can you expect?
Nisar has also refused to let Asia Bibi, a Christian mother of five, who has
been on death row for ten years for "blasphemy," have an early hearing for the
final appeal of her death sentence, after a trial that has been called "unfair."
Rita Panahi, commented on Bibi's case in Australia's Herald Sun:
When Bibi, working in the field on a scorching day, was asked to bring a water
from a well, she committed the alleged blasphemy of drinking some of the water
from the cup. "Another female farmhand, who already had a feud with Bibi,
claimed she had "soiled" the utensil and the water supply with her unclean,
Christian hands. Bibi was accused of "defiling the water.'" "For once," Bibi
recounted, in her memoir, Blasphemy: Sentenced to Death Over A Cup of Water, " I
decided to defend myself and hold my head high. I said, 'I think Jesus would
have a different viewpoint to Mohammad.' The woman replied, "How do you dare to
question the Prophet, dirty animal?" ... "Soon a mob confronted Bibi and her
family before the police arrived...". Many accused of blasphemy in Pakistan are
not so fortunate and are killed before they are formally charged."
According to another report:
"The Maulvis (clerics) want her dead. They have announced a prize of Rs 10,000
to Rs 500,000 (£60 to £3,200) for anyone who kills Asia. They have even declared
that if the court acquits her they will ensure the death sentence stands."
Blasphemy laws are a major problem for minorities, especially Christians. These
laws are abused to settle issues, such as personal grudges, even for extremely
minor disputes, such as money, a piece of land or even children quarrelling. The
general public does not wait for the legal process; they murder people on the
spot. They burn them alive, they destroy their houses and places of worship --
not just the accused person but also, collectively, other members of his
community.
The Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan clearly indicates that
non-Muslims are third-class citizens and forbids them from attaining the highest
administrative positions in the government (see Appendix). It is compulsory for
every officer to take an oath that he is Muslim before being appointed. Only
mean and low-level jobs, such as cleaning the sewers, are reserved for
non-Muslims. Newspapers and other outlets advertise that only non-Muslims may
apply for those jobs.
According to Islamic law, a non-Muslim man cannot marry a Muslim woman. A
non-Muslim also cannot appear in court as a witness against a Muslim, because
his testimony or claim is considered unreliable and biased. A non-Muslim cannot
take a case against a Muslim to the Federal Shariat Court. If there is a case
against a non-Muslim and he wants to hire a non-Muslim lawyer as counsel, it is
not permitted. Only a Muslim lawyer can be present in court, and its compulsory
that the judge must also be Muslim.
Minorities in Pakistan and other Islamic states have to go through hell every
day; how can they even think about blasphemy?
Even if a case of blasphemy is not proven against Christians, they still can be
murdered by an angry mob or while in police custody. Non-Muslims can also easily
be sentenced to death by a court: even a single claim by Muslim against a
non-Muslim is enough to "prove" him guilty.
Pakistani authorities have failed to provide security and safety to religious
minorities. That is the one of the reasons religious minorities, especially
Christians and Hindus, have been fleeing from Pakistan.
Usually a country's authorities are supposed to support and help persecuted
people; in Pakistan, instead, the institutions of government provide funds only
to fundamentalists and other segments of the population engaged in persecuting
non-Muslims: these taskmasters see themselves as soldiers of "Allah."
Madarasa Haqania, for instance, is the birthplace of the Taliban and terrorism
in the region. Known also as the "University of Jihad," its students are the
leaders of the groups who were involved in bomb attacks on churches.
Non-Muslims have made many sacrifices for Pakistan; in return, they are killed
in public, in broad daylight, and there is no one to hear them. Their murderers
are praised as heroes, not only by the general public. Politicians and judges in
the courts kiss their hands and salute them with honor.
To speak for your own rights or someone else's is taking on a suicidal risk. You
could face charges of blasphemy, be murdered in cold blood, or "disappeared".
For example, Salmaan Taseer, the Governor of Punjab Province, criticized the
abuse of Pakistan's blasphemy laws. For this, he was murdered by his own
bodyguard in 2011. Rashid Rehman was a lawyer who agreed to take on a blasphemy
case. He was gunned down by two men who walked into his office posing as
clients.
Christian organizations, especially the Pope and the Vatican, have failed to
give any hope to persecuted Christians.
Providing a press release or sending a note is not enough. The pope truly needs
to come to help his flock and to establish policies to safeguard these
persecuted people from the Islamic world. We have observed that the pope is so
busy making statements to please Islam and advising Europe to open its gates for
Muslim radicals.
He is ignoring that these Muslims are persecuting Christians who live in their
countries. These Muslims, when non-Muslims try to flee towards Europe, are
throwing them out of the boats and drowning them into sea. Meanwhile our
Christian brothers are inviting Muslims to come to Europe and invade us, rape
our daughters and cut our throats. Is this what the Vatican and the Western
world really want?
Rahat John Austin is a Pakistani Lawyer and author, has been working for the
rule of law, justice and equal distribution of rights in the Islamic State of
Pakistan on behalf of vulnerable and deprived segments of the society,
especially women and minorities. His first book, "Human Trafficking in
Pakistan," was funded by American High Commission and International Organization
for Migration (IOM) in 2012. His second book, "The Dracula State," on Pakistan's
Constitution and Blasphemy Laws was published in 2017.
APPENDIX: On the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan
Preamble of the 1973 Constitution:
"Whereas sovereignty over the entire Universe belongs to Almighty Allah alone
and the authority to be exercised by the people of Pakistan within the limits
prescribed by Him is a sacred trust; And whereas it is the will of the people of
Pakistan to establish an order;...
Wherein the Muslims shall be enabled to order their lives in the individual and
collective spheres in accordance with the teachings and requirements of Islam as
set out in the Holy Quran and Sunnah;...
Wherein the principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social
justice, as enunciated by Islam, shall be fully observed;
Article 1 of the 1973 Constitution: The Islamic State and territories
(1) Pakistan shall be a Federal Republic to be known as the Islamic Republic of
Pakistan, hereinafter referred to as Pakistan.
Article 2 of the 1973 Constitution: Islam to be State religion;
Article 2 of the Constitution states:
'Islam shall be the state religion of Pakistan ...', and
Article 2-A stipulates:
'wherein the principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social
justice, as enunciated by Islam, shall be fully observed'.
Article 31; Government role to promote Islamic way of life:
Article 31, deals with the particular steps which "shall be taken" to enable the
Muslims of Pakistan to conduct themselves in, what the heading of Article 31
describes, "Islamic way of life". it is only through such like provisions of the
Constitution the Article 2 can be given an operative shape."
Article 41 of the 1973 Constitution: The President
(2) A person shall not be qualified for election as President unless he is a
Muslim of not less than forty-five years of age and is qualified to be elected
as member of the National Assembly.
Article 41, while providing the qualifications for election to the office of
president of Pakistan, states (in no uncertain terms) that in order to be
qualified a candidate has to be a Muslim.
The Third Schedule to the constitution, which contains the text of the oath to
be
taken by the president before entering upon the said office, specifically
provides, in relevant part, that the candidate shall affirm that he is a Muslim
and believes in the Oneness of Allah, the Holy Quran, and that the Prophet
Muhammad (pbuh) was the last of the prophets of Allah.
Thus, the constitution is, in express terms, discriminatory and excludes any
member of the
minority community of Pakistan from holding the office of the president of
Pakistan.
Under Article 41, only a Muslim is qualified to be elected as president.
Initially, there was no such bar of religion against the election of the prime
minister.
Article 91; the Prime Minister must be a Muslim.
The original language of the 1973 Constitution was substituted by P.O. No. 14 of
1985, providing that, "after the election of Speaker and Deputy Speaker, the
National Assembly shall, to the exclusion of any other business, proceeds to
elect without debate one of its Muslim members to be
the Prime Minister."
Article 91 of the 1973 Constitution: The Cabinet-
(1) There shall be a Cabinet of Ministers, with the Prime Minister at its head,
to aid and advise the President in the exercise of his functions.
(2) (3) After the election of the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker, the National
Assembly shall, to the exclusion of any other business, proceed to elect without
debate one of its Muslim members to be the Prime Minister.
By virtue of Article 91, the National Assembly of Pakistan is restricted to
electing only one of its Muslim members as the prime minister of Pakistan. The
Third Schedule to the Constitution, which contains the text of the oath to be
taken by the prime minister
before entering upon the said office, specifically provides, in relevant part,
that the candidate shall affirm that he is a Muslim and believes in the Oneness
of Allah, the Holy Quran and that the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the last of
the prophets of Allah.
Thus the Constitution is, in express terms, discriminatory and excludes any
member of the minority community of Pakistan from holding the office of prime
minister of Pakistan.
It is clear from a bare reading of Articles 41 and 91 and the relevant oaths of
office contained in the Third Schedule to the constitution that members of the
minority communities have been denied the right to hold the high constitutional
offices of the president and prime minister of Pakistan.
Articles 62 and 63:
Articles 62 and 63 were added to the constitution by Zia and were later
protected
through the eighth amendment to the constitution (P.O No.14 of 1985).
Apart from other qualifications to being a member of the parliament a candidate
has to be "of good character and not commonly known as one who violates Islamic
injunctions."
He or she must have adequate knowledge of Islamic teachings and must be a
practicing Muslim who "abstains from major sins." He/she should be "sagacious,
righteous and non
profligate and honest and amin." Non-Muslims are required to have "good moral
reputation."
Article 203C of the 1973 Constitution: The Federal Shariat Court-
All judges of the Federal Shariat Court as provided in Article 203C are to be
Muslims.
(1) The Court shall consist of not more than eight Muslim [Judges] including the
[Chief Justice] to be appointed by the President.
Article 203E of the 1973 Constitution:
A party to any proceedings before the Court under clause (1) of Article 203D may
be represented by a legal practitioner who is a Muslim and has been enrolled as
an advocate of a High Court for a period of not less than five years or as an
advocate of the Supreme Court or by a jurisconsult selected by the party from
out of a panel of jurisconsults maintained by the Court for the purpose.
Article 203E Sub Article (4)
Expressly provides that the legal practitioner representing a petitioner in the
Federal Shariat Court must be a Muslim.
Article 227 of the 1973 Constitution: Provisions relating to the Holy Quran and
Sunnah-
All existing laws shall be brought in conformity with the Injunctions of Islam
as laid down in the Holy Quran and Sunnah, in this Part referred to as the
Injunctions of Islam, and no law shall be enacted which is repugnant to such
Injunctions.
Any legislative or executive authority cannot enact a law or promulgate any
Ordinance or Order in view of Article 227 of the Constitution which clearly
prohibits the enactment of law which is repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam as
laid down in the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah.
Article 228-the Council of Islamic Ideology
Article 228 established the Council of Islamic Ideology in an institutionalized
role to oversee the legislation. The Federal Sharia Court, established by Zia
under;
Article 203 (A–J) additional powers of the Sharia Court
Article 203 (A–J) enjoys additional powers similar to those of the Council.
Under Article 203–D, the Sharia Court can declare any law defunct if it is
assumed to be against Islamic injunctions.
"Under Article 260(3) (a) of the Constitution, a person belonging to the Ahmadi
group is not a Muslim
A number of decisions have emphasized that according to the constitutional
amendment, Ahmadis cannot claim the rights or follow the law that are specially
determined for Muslims.
© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Iran spends billions on weapons programs, terrorism while ignoring Iranians'
basic needs, report finds
By Ben Evansky | Fox
News/January 28/18
Report details Iran missile activity since the nuclear deal
The report says since 2016, the regime has launched 16 missiles considered to be
nuclear capable; Rich Edson has the details for 'Special Report.'
Iran is spending billions of dollars on its weapons programs and supporting
terrorism around the globe while it ignores the basic needs of its people, a new
report asserts. The report, issued by the National Council of Resistance of Iran
(NCRI), states that this month’s uprising against the regime was due to what it
states are the “grueling high prices and economic strains on an array of social
sectors.” It claims that this is a result of the regime putting its resources,
“toward domestic suppression, warmongering and expansion of terrorism abroad,”
which the report points out has led to poverty and deprivation among Iranians.
The report is titled “Primary Causes of Poverty and Popular Uprisings in Iran.”
It says the report is based on a “high-level assessment” which revealed that the
annual minimum cost to Iranians of keeping the “clerical regime in power” is
about $55 billion. The national council says on its website it is a “broad
coalition of democratic Iranian organizations, groups, and personalities” that
“was founded in 1981 in Tehran, Iran, on the initiative of Massoud Rajavi, the
leader of the Iranian Resistance.”
The report claims that half of those funds came from “money channeled to
military and security-related activities and export of terrorism, funded by
revenues obtained from institutions controlled by the supreme leader’s office
and the IRGC.” The report indicates that the other half of the funds is from the
official state budget and is earmarked for military- and security-related
affairs and the export of terrorism.
Iran launched more ballistic missiles after countries signed the 2015 nuclear
deal.
The report also describes how during the height of this month’s anti-regime
protests, shouted comments were made against Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei. The report states that over the years Khamenei has taken over the
“bulk of Iran’s economy.” It claims the organizations and institutions,
including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), show that Khamenei-controlled-companies
make up over 50 percent of Iran’s gross domestic product, or GDP. The report
compares what it calls funding for “warmongering and suppression” against other
state expenditures. It claims Iran’s total health care budget for 2018 is $16.3
billion, which is a third of its total war budget.
The report also reveals that for the last six years the total spent on its
Syrian activities is around $15-20 billion a year. It describes how protesters
shouted during the January protests, “Leave Syria, think about us,” and “Neither
Gaza or Lebanon, I dedicate my life to Iran.”The report compares paltry welfare
payments made to those living under absolute poverty with the larger sums of
money paid to Afghan mercenaries bankrolled by Iran to fight in Syria.
Activists risk their lives to bring freedom to Iran.
According to statements made by Afghan mercenaries during interviews with
state-run media, each mercenary is paid between $600-700 a month. Doing the
math, nearly 20,000 Afghan mercenaries cost the regime between $12-$14 million a
month. Compare that to the nearly $70 monthly stipend Iranians living under the
absolute poverty line receive, according to the report.
“This report has the merit of explaining the hidden dimension of the ongoing
Iranian opposition to the regime,” Fox News national security and foreign
affairs analyst Walid Phares said. He added that he has long argued since talks
unfolded between the Obama administration and parties involved in the Iran
nuclear deal that the Iranian regime would not use the billions of dollars it
got from the deal for the needs of the people. Phares said, “This policy has
been practiced by the regime since its inception: They put the ideological war
doctrine ahead of their people's daily life's interest.”He argued that one cause
of the 2009 uprising was middle-class anger against the regime's support of
Hezbollah and Hamas. Phares said history repeated itself again when “Tehran's
ruling elite gave priority to funding external interventions in Iraq, Syria,
Lebanon and Yemen, over the well being of Iranian civil society. This led to the
protests of this year.”
The report concludes that any future deals with Iran will strengthen the
clerical regime and its armed entity, the IRGC. The report ends by recommending
that to, “order to eliminate the dictatorship's machinery of war and
suppression, all of the regime's officials, the IRGC and the array of economic
organizations and institutions in their orbit of influence must be placed under
international sanctions.”
**Ben Evansky reports for Fox News on the United Nations and international
affairs.
Jordan’s foreign policy message from Davos
Shehab Al-Makahleh/Al Arabiya/January 28/18
It is palpable that a nation’s foreign policy mirrors its political leaders’
perspectives and views. These are a product of internal and external factors
that influence political orientations in relations with other countries and
international organizations. Jordan, like other
Mideast countries, has always been inclined to its geopolitical environment,
international relations, and causes and effects of its geographical, demographic
and economic situations which include among others national wealth, foreign aid
and socio-economic changes. Among the major challenges
that have been facing Jordan are the Zionist projects and their risk on the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict as well as on Jordan. Jordan's foreign policy
depends on its geography and geostrategic location. It also depends on the
positions of major powers and axes. This confirms Jordan's continued need to
balance its foreign relations network with the aim of achieving its political
stability in line with its leadership strategy. Since
his assumption of constitutional powers, King Abdullah II has been striving to
strengthen Jordan’s political and economic relations with other countries.
Jordan, too, has a geographical location located between strong Arab forces:
Saudi Arabia in the south, Iraq in the east and Syria in the north, and these
countries are of great importance. Its adjacency to Palestine is also critical
and is one of the challenges to the countries national security.
Determinants of Jordanian foreign policies:
Jordan has a high percentage of educated citizens. Since many of them work
overseas and in other countries of the region, this affects the decision making
process in the kingdom. Any decision would affect the Jordanian labor force in
other countries due to kingdom’s stances vis-à-vis certain issues and causes
including the recent developments in the question of Jerusalem when American
President Donald Trump recognised Jerusalem as capital of Israel. In other
words, Jordan balances out its policies to ease tension that would affect its
human resources in other countries.
Moreover, the structure of Jordan’s population has a significant impact on
Jordan's foreign policy. Since Jordan is scarce with its economic resources, it
depends on assistance from foreign countries. That limits and restricts
decision-making in the country and poses a major challenge on its leadership.
The religious ideology of the Jordanian leadership and its doctrine regarding
the Christian and Muslim Holy Sites in Jerusalem have given Jordan an important
weight in the region. This justifies why King Abdullah denounced Trump’s
decision regarding Jerusalem.
Though there is a growing polarization in the Arab arena, Jordan is watching
attentively to set its own directions.
Though Jordan cannot do much about the American decision, the kingdom
orchestrates to clarify the Jordanian stand regarding the holy sites in
Jerusalem.
This is clear when the king said on Thursday at the World Economic Forum (WEF)
in Davos: “Jerusalem is a city that ends up dividing us, which I think will be
catastrophic for mankind, or is it a city of hope that brings us together.”The
king voiced Jordan’s support for resolving the status quo of the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Some analysts believe that Jordan's foreign policy
recently shifted from the role of competition with other regional countries to
seeking national interests while moving with a quick dynamic to keep up with
world changes. The political equation is that Jordan is fighting in order to
preserve its survival and existence. It does not replace its old allies with new
ones; it balances out its policies. The kingdom is striving to secure economic
and water supplies necessary for the country’s progress and development.
Symbol of moderation
The king’s speeches in the US Congress, in the European Union as well as the
United Nations, have always depicted a moderate Jordan, based on understanding
of international and regional variables. The king, who leads the Jordanian
foreign policy, links the history of Jordan with the modernity of the country
that shape its identity when he speaks with other world leaders. This is how he
promotes opportunities in the country at the international level. He usually
interacts with Western decision-making circles. Many people wonder about the
frequent visits of His Majesty to Washington and London. The reason is that
further clarification leads to more communication and cooperation.
Jordanians believe that the Hashemite family is the true wealth of
Jordan. Though there is a growing polarization in the Arab arena, Jordan is
watching attentively to set its directions. This justifies why the king said in
Davos that there is a need to reserve judgement on the future of the two-state
solution until the United States presents its proposed peace deal.
To conclude, Jordan, globally and regionally, is viewed as a symbol of
moderation. The kingdom is the most committed state to international obligations
and a very good example of inter-cooperation. The Middle East has been, until
this moment, a zone of influence for the great powers. In Jordan, when talking
about politics, the focus is on the character of the king who formulates this
policy and decision making. Furthermore, Jordanian foreign policy is governed by
a combination of internal and external factors that interact with each other.
Thus, Jordan is governed by a set of objectives. First, maintaining stability
for the country is a priority. Second, the balance of policies with other Arab
states to be able to respond to every change, movement or transformation. Third,
respect for the sovereignty of all states in the world, the inadmissibility of
interfering in internal affairs, and also full compliance to all treaties and
conventions.
Syria: From revolution to occupation
Riad Nasan Agha/Al Arabiya/January
28/18
The Syrians protested demanding freedom and dignity, however years later after
the Syrian crisis, they are facing the loss of their whole country and they are
scattered around the world. Syria became an international battlefield, and since
the regime lost its legitimate sovereignty, Russia and Iran became in control of
Syrian sovereignty. That’s what Nero did, when he
burned Rome and sat in his tower singing Homer’s poems, enjoying the sight of
his country burning, but he eventually killed himself.
It seems that the Iranian occupation is the most serious one of the current
occupations facing Syria, The Persian dream of expansion found the right
opportunity to be fulfilled after having a great opportunity in occupying Iraq,
controlling Lebanon, and it is waiting for a fourth one in Yemen.
As for Russia, it has no project beyond economic interests and to return to the
international presence, after being weakened due to the collapse of the Soviet
Union, Its entry into Syria signaled the return of the Cold War, which is taking
place now and about to turn it into a world war, if fools remained in control of
the fate of the peoples.
Iranian interference
Since the beginning of the Iranian revolution, Arabs have been keen to establish
good relations with Iran and took practical steps to strengthen relations with
Tehran, as they were aware that being neighbors is a matter of history and
geography. But the Persian project continued to expand, export the Iranian
revolution and impose doctrines, which made the Arab friendliness burn in the
flames of the Persian domination tendencies. Iran’s
interference in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, and the repeated attacks on
Saudi Arabia have increased the explosion risk, if Iran had good intentions for
the Arab neighbors or accepted good neighborliness, it would have returned the
three UAE islands which were occupied by the Shah regime; to their owners to
start a new era of peace and tranquility for the peoples of the region.
Now with the successive failure of UN-sponsored negotiations in Syria,
Yemen and Libya the gap increased, these negotiations were the only way to stop
the bloodshed of Arabs.
In Syria, the negotiations reached a dead-end in its eighth round. I do not
expect any breakthrough as long as Russia supports the Assad regime and wants to
reproduce it. The Americans and the Europeans launched their latest plan in
Paris few days ago, we hope it would take a serious and fair course before the
Sochi Conference, it is impossible for the regime to survive by ruling with
force and violence after it destroyed Syria. Despite
the cruelty the Syrians are suffering from, they adhere to the Geneva
Declaration 1, the international resolution 2254 and the basics of the Geneva
negotiations, which requires the establishment of a transitional governing body
with the participation of those who were not involved in killing the people who
support the regime itself and technocrats, this alone is a sufficient proof that
the opposition understands the nature of the situation, its concern for the
state’s institutions and for the safety and independence of the country.