LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
February 15/2018
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias18/english.february15.18.htm 

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006

 

Bible Quotations
Who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires. The mind governed by the flesh is death, but the mind governed by the Spirit is life and peace 
Romans 08/01-17: Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit who gives life has set you free from the law of sin and death. For what the law was powerless to do because it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to be a sin offering. And so he condemned sin in the flesh, in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. Those who live according to the flesh have their minds set on what the flesh desires; but those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires.  The mind governed by the flesh is death, but the mind governed by the Spirit is life and peace. The mind governed by the flesh is hostile to God; it does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so. Those who are in the realm of the flesh cannot please God. You, however, are not in the realm of the flesh but are in the realm of the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, they do not belong to Christ. But if Christ is in you, then even though your body is subject to death because of sin, the Spirit gives life because of righteousness. And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies because of his Spirit who lives in you. Therefore, brothers and sisters, we have an obligation—but it is not to the flesh, to live according to it. For if you live according to the flesh, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live. For those who are led by the Spirit of God are the children of God. The Spirit you received does not make you slaves, so that you live in fear again; rather, the Spirit you received brought about your adoption to sonship. And by him we cry, “Abba, Father.” The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God’s children. Now if we are children, then we are heirs—heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory."”
 
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 14-15/18
Hariri on February 14: We will run for elections with Future lists of candidates from all confessions and refuse any alliance with Hezbollah/NNA/February 14/18
Iranian 'winter' coming to northern border, analyst warns/Anna Ahronheim/Jerusalem Post/February 14/18
Iran, Russia, and China's Central Role in the Venezuela Crisis/Joseph M. Humire/Gatestone Institute/February 14/18
Palestinians: Abbas's Lies and Falling Mask/Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/February 14/18
Macron Vows to Reform Islam in France/"It is time to bring in a new generation."/Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/February 14/18
The clash of American and Israeli priorities on Iran/Raghida Dergham/February 14/18


Titles For Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on February 14-15/18
Hariri on February 14: We will run for elections with Future lists of candidates from all confessions and refuse any alliance with Hezbollah
Hariri Says Keen on Dissociation Policy, Rejects 'Any Electoral Alliance with Hizbullah'
Tillerson to Urge Neutrality in Lebanon, Propose Offshore Gas Settlement
Tillerson Says Hizbullah Part of Political Process in Lebanon
Farrell Says STL Trying Individuals Not Parties, Offers Help in Tueni, Gemayel Cases
Head of Defense Office Francois Roux Leaving the STL
Report: STL to Issue Verdict in Hariri Trial in Spring 2019
ISF, State Security Officers Held for Aiding Drug Dealers
Harb: I prayed with Sfeir lest today's commemoration turns into tears on a glorious page in the history of independent Lebanon
Mikati says he is working to form an integrated electoral list to include Tripoli, Dinnieh, Minnieh
Haber: Hezbollah Seeking to Tighten Its Grip on Lebanese State


Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 14-15/18
17 dead in shooting at Florida high school
Tillerson signs $6.4bn funding package with Jordan
Shooting outside U.S. Top Spy Headquarters
Netanyahu Rejects Calls to Resign after Police Seek Indictment
Key Israel Minister Criticizes Netanyahu, but Staying in Coalition
Tillerson Meets Syria Opposition in Amman
At Least 19 Migrants Killed in Libya Truck Crash
US school shooting leaves 20-50 hurt, assailant ‘still at large’
King Salman discusses Syrian situation in a call with Putin
Government pay P5,000 in cash gifts to repatriated Filipinos from Kuwait
Yemeni army kills 40 Houthis advancing near Midi front
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan carry out joint naval training
Abu Dhabi court to hear appeal in rape and murder of 11-year-old boy
Kuwait to give $2 billion in loans, investments for Iraq
Canada offers condolences following death of Mr. Seyed-Emami
Foreign Affairs Minister to address global security issues at Munich Security Conference
 
Latest Lebanese Related News published on February 14-15/18
Hariri on February 14: We will run for elections with Future lists of candidates from all confessions and refuse any alliance with Hezbollah
Wed 14 Feb 2018/NNA
In his delivered speech at the 13th commemoration of Martyr Prime Minister Rafic Hariri's assassination held by the Future Movement at "BIEL" this afternoon, Prime Minister Saad Hariri said:
"Thirteen years, and you have been with me, for better and for worse. The companion of the difficult days, and they were many on us, on the country and the region.
Thirteen years, and every time I need you, you tell me: Continue Saad, our cause is greater than words. And nothing on earth must let you retreat. We devoted ourselves to serving our country. This our destiny. The stability of Lebanon and its safety are the most important assets in our lives.
Thirteen years, and the region is boiling. Revolutions, wars, discords and displacement. Syria was crushed by battles, and has become a test field for armies and militias of all nationalities. Iraq is still a prisoner of conflicts, and the destruction of Mosul has become equal to the destruction of Basra. The Happy Yemen has become the saddest country in the world. Libya was struck by the curse of terrorism, and the curse is moving from one country to the other.
Despite everything, I want to reassure you, Lebanon is still in the safety zone because the spirit of Rafic Hariri is still with us, and because the young man, who was jeopardizing his life to obtain a ceasefire in Beirut, would never accept to hand Beirut over to civil war again. And because he who worked for the Taef Agreement, could never accept to break coexistence, and he who helped 40,000 students graduate, would never accept to train armed militias.
We worked upon your legacy, we chose to walk in your footsteps, so the state, institutions and legitimacy in Lebanon would remain, and so all people would know that we do not accept that the sacrifices of the martyrs be lost in the collapse of the country. Those who say otherwise are waging false wars. We pushed the Syrian fire away from our country, despite the presence of more than one and a half million Syrian refugees. We expelled Daesh, and terrorism could not find a favorable environment in our country. We now have a strong army and security forces that we are proud of ... And the Information branch that was established by your beloved Wissam stands on the lookout, with all the security services, in the face of Mossad and terrorism.
We have economic and social problems...true. We have political differences...true. But we have a country, a state, institutions, legitimacy, a government, an opposition, freedom and press...at a time when countries, institutions, legalities, freedoms, armies and oppositions are collapsing.
Thirteen years, and we are still insisting on justice. We will not despair, we will not forget and we will not compromise. Some are seeing that heavenly justice is being achieved somewhere. But the justice of the International Tribunal is on the way...because it is the key to truth, and the key is the trust of the March 14 Martyrs, for all of us, especially the Future Movement.
Thirteen years, and I still dream every day of the day when I will see your dream, the dream of Rafic Hariri, become reality in all of Lebanon.
Dear Brothers and Sisters, Representative of His Excellency the President, Representative of the Speaker of the Parliament, Colleagues and Friends, My beloved comrades in the Future Movement, may peace and mercy be upon you,
The first words were with Martyr Prime Minister Rafic Hariri and his fellow martyrs. We gather today to remain faithful to their struggle in the face of the worst periods of guardianship in the history of Lebanon.
I am honored to announce the commemoration of 14 February this year, as an occasion to salute Al-Quds Al-Sharif...a salute to Jerusalem from the soul of the martyr prime minister, a salute to Jerusalem from the Future Movement, and all those who gather to honor the martyrs of freedom and independence, March 14 martyrs. For the sake of Jerusalem, the eternal capital of Palestine, I call on all of you to observe a minute of solidarity for Jerusalem and the steadfastness of the Palestinian people.
Dear brothers and sisters,
We thank God Almighty,
That the loyal supporters of Prime Minister Rafic Hariri still meet in Beirut, from all regions, to confirm that the Movement is in the first lines to protect Lebanon. Your steadfastness, your moderation, your Arabism, your patience, your rejection of discord, and your belief in coexistence were and still are the best weapon to face challenges.
History will write that you are the army of moderation that protected Lebanon from falling into the quagmire of discord and extremism, and that protecting your country is nobler than any participation in the wars of others.
This is our approach, this is our decision.
However, there are those who play daily the tune of outbidding on the Future Movement. Therefore, let everyone know that I, Saad Rafic Hariri, refuse to lead these noble loyal people to the abyss or any civil conflict. Let everyone also know that I will not sell my Arab brothers fake Lebanese political goods and stances for consumption in the media and sectarian markets. We are not merchants of positions and slogans, we are honest about our role towards our people and our brothers. I will defy with you all challenges, and will not accept that Lebanon leaves its Arab environment, nor enter the Holocaust of Arab wars.
The decision to disassociate Lebanon is an essential basis of the challenge, and the stabilization of Lebanon in its natural position, a state that maintains the best relations with the Arab states and rejects any offense against them. The decision was not taken to remain mere words on paper; whoever signs a decision taken by the state must respect this decision.
Dear friends, brothers and sisters, the intellectual creativity of some outbidders has reached a point where they called for the handover of the country to Hezbollah, to hold it responsible for the repercussions that will ensue. Then they promoted the idea that the elections will lead to a parliament that will legalize Hezbollah's weapons. This is an example of opinions by people who were friends, but they lost the path of friendship, in search for roles in the country and abroad, and writing stances and reports against Saad Hariri and the Future Movement.
Those know very well that the real political and electoral confrontation is between the Future Movement and Hezbollah, and they also know that everything they are doing will not be able to get a tiny percentage of Hezbollah's capital in the elections. But they are betting that they will hunt the crumbs of the tables of the Future Movement, to turn these crumbs into an electoral meal that benefits the candidates of Hezbollah and its allies. I mean that the people who are outbidding on us and betting on the feeling of anger, know that the maximum they can do is to divide us and weaken our vote, in the interest of one party only: the interest of Hezbollah. Those are the ones who are actually working for Hezbollah. They denote sound phenomena that will lead to nowhere.
We are certain that the Future Movement, together with the supporters of Prime Minister Rafic Hariri, are unbreakable. The Future Movement is unbreakable! It is an essential pillar of the Lebanese formula and the national balance, and it is impossible for it to form a bridge over which illusions of overthrowing the formula, the Taif Accord and the Arabism of Lebanon can pass. The Taif Agreement is a red line. It is not subject to modification, alteration and interpretation. It is not a framework for any agreements between two, three or four groups...
We, in the Future Movement, will not cover any policy working to violate the national accord document and renew civil conflict in Lebanon. We have been, and will remain, the protectors of the Republic and its democratic system, the guardians of coexistence and the Arab identity of Lebanon and the unsurmountable barrier to any external guardianship. The era of guardianships has ended, and March 14, 2005 is a milestone that will not be erased from the history of this country.
Brothers and sisters, young men and women of the Future Movement, we are a few weeks away from the parliamentary elections, which we expect to be a turning point in our parliamentary life, whether at the level of testing the new law or renewing parliament. The Future Movement is preparing to run the election in all of Lebanon. We will announce the names of candidates within days and will enter the elections under the umbrella of Martyr Prime Minister Rafic Hariri.
The electoral program of the Future Movement is to restore the prestige of the Rafic Hariri era, free from the pressures of tutelage and from those who climb on the shoulders of the state and the law.
On the national and political level, there are constants without which the country cannot be stable or achieve progress, and which we cannot abandon under any circumstances:
1- The Taef agreement and the requirements of national accord are red lines
2- The commitment to dialogue in approaching political disputes
3- The protection of Lebanon from the repercussions of the wars in the region
4- The refusal of interventions in the affairs of the Arab countries
5- Consider the sentences that will be issued by the Special Tribunal for Lebanon binding to the Lebanese authorities to prosecute and arrest the accused
6- The emphasis on the monopoly of weapons by the state and its legitimate institutions
7- The activation of the capacities of the army and the security forces to enable them to spread their power, defend the sovereignty and fight terrorism
8- Commit to the UN resolutions about Lebanon, particularly UNSCR 1701, and emphasize the national solidarity requirements to confront the Israeli greed in our national water
9- End the dossier of the return of Syrian refugees to their country and refuse all forms of settlement in Lebanon
10- Protect the Islamic society from the infiltration of the terrorist organizations and work to issue a general amnesty that includes the Islamic detainees who have no blood on their hands
11- Expand the participation of young men and women in the political life.
First we are determined to continue fighting corruption and committed to improve transparency in all state actions. But we do not and will not accept the daily and systematic corruption accusations, lacking transparency, with regards to any constructive or productive step we try to take. We are working for the country and its future and all our work is concentrated on young men and women who are the future of the country. The country was disabled as a result of three years of presidential vacuum. The first thing we did was to end this vacuum and the second step was to tackle the problems that accumulated as a result of said vacuum.
In less than a year, we completed a new electoral law after years of stagnation. We approved the salaries scale that was frozen for years. We made appointments in the security, judicial and diplomatic corps that were vacant for years and years. We completed the socio-economic council for the first time since its formation in the Taef Accord. We approved the first state budget in 12 years and endorsed tens of laws that were in the drawers of Parliament for years and years, most importantly the partnership between the public and private sectors, and the oil and gas contracts that were signed two days ago, and we joined the international transparency agreement. We also prepared a complete plan for electricity and waste problems, and exerted great efforts that will give results soon in the most important sector for the future, telecommunications and internet.
We prepared the first complete plan in six years to cope with the Syrian displacement and we will present it in the Brussels conference in two months.
In a month's time, we will go to Rome to mobilize the international support for the Lebanese army and security forces, and in a month and a half we will head to Paris to secure financing for 250 projects valued at $16 billion over ten years. These projects include roads, transportation, sewage, waste, electricity schools, hospitals, and communications. This will lead to the revival of the infrastructure and the economy.
In fact all this work is for the young men and women in Lebanon. The job opportunities created by these projects are for them, in Lebanon. By strengthening the army and the security forces, we will be guaranteeing security and safety for the young men and women in Lebanon. When we develop the telecommunication sector and the internet becomes cheaper and faster, we will be opening the new economy, the economy of knowledge for them. By solving the problems of electricity and waste and improving the level of the infrastructure and the essential services, we will be preparing the ground for the country that should be worthy of all the young men and women in Lebanon.
The real question to all the Lebanese in these elections is: Do you want this program to continue? Or do you want it to stop? If you want it to continue, you should go and vote. You should know that those who will not vote, will actually be voting. The non-participation in the election is in itself a vote, not necessarily for a specific list or candidate, but in fact voting to stop this project, the project of advancing the country, the economy and the citizen. We are candidates for work and achievement. We were the cornerstone in the project of reconstructing the country in the nineties and we are still the cornerstone to launch the biggest investment plan that covers all Lebanon. We are going to the elections with the spirit of Rafic Hariri. We want the country to be once again a work site and our parliamentary team is responsible for achieving this program.
When the government was formed, I promised the Lebanese a new electoral law and free elections. The new law was achieved and the elections will take place on time. These elections are an opportunity to all of us to listen to the Lebanese and to talk to them directly, frankly and transparently in order to face together all the challenges with hope and determination. No progress and advancement in the country can be achieved without your support, opinion and ideas. It is necessary to hear your voice in any step we take.
Some people do not want the elections, but they will be disappointed. Others want to kidnap your voice through outbidding and the empty slogans to present it as a gift to the project that is the opposite of yours, the opposite of democracy, freedom, moderation and hope. But these will also be disappointed.
We have been hearing theories in the country for the last few months. Some say that the Future Movement is heading to a new 5-party alliance with the Free Patriotic Movement, the Progressive Socialist Party, Amal and Hezbollah. Others say that the Future Movement will ally with the Lebanese Forces, the Kataeb, the National Liberal Party and the independent candidates. Some say that the Future Movement will be the biggest and maybe the only looser in the elections. When you ask them why? They say because the Future Movement is bankrupt...does not have money. This is the biggest insult to you, to the supporters of Rafic Hariri. It is a rude expression of an idea that says that those who vote for the Future Movement and Rafic Hariri can be bought. They don't vote according to their convictions, or by their free democratic will, or because they adhere to the project of Lebanon's hope, dignity, sovereignty, freedom and Arabism. They just vote for the money. Okay, if this is the challenge, we accept it. I and all the young men and women accept this challenge. Yes, we don't have money for the elections, and we refuse any alliance with Hezbollah. We are a movement that refuses to be put in a sectarian box. We are a movement that includes all confessions and regions because we are the movement of moderation and hope for all Lebanese and their ability to work, exert effort and be patient and creative for the sake of Lebanon.
We will go to elections with Future lists that gather candidates from all confessions. The supporters of the Future Movement and Rafic Hariri all over Lebanon will prove that nobody can buy or sell their votes. All Lebanese will show you who are the honest people, the patriots committed to Lebanon's stability and always ready to protect Lebanon. They will continue today, tomorrow and every day in order to achieve the project of Rafic Hariri, the project of hope, advancement and stability for Lebanon.
We will meet on May 6th for the elections, and we will meet again on May 7th with all the Lebanese and with Martyr Premier Rafic Hariri."
Before the commemoration ceremony, Hariri visited the grave of his father Martyr Prime Minister Rafic Hariri in Beirut's Central District, where he prayed for his soul and the souls of his martyr companions, in the presence of the Director General of the Internal Security Forces, Major General Imad Othman, Mr Adnan Fakhani and dignitaries.
Earlier, Hariri planted seedlings of roses named after Martyr Prime Minister Rafic Hariri in the main courtyard of the entrance of the Grand Serail, in the presence of the Secretary General of the Council of Ministers Fouad Fleifel.
 
Hariri Says Keen on Dissociation Policy, Rejects 'Any Electoral Alliance with Hizbullah'
Naharnet/February 14/18/Prime Minister Saad Hariri on Wednesday underscored his keenness on Lebanon's so-called policy of dissociation towards regional conflicts, as he promised a “real” battle against Hizbullah in the upcoming elections.
“Let everyone know that I will not sell my Arab brothers 'fake Lebanese political goods'... We are not merchants of positions and slogans, we are honest about our role towards our people and our brothers,” Hariri told a BIEL rally marking the 13th anniversary of the assassination of his father – ex-PM Rafik Hariri. “I will not accept that Lebanon leaves its Arab environment or be plunged into the inferno of Arab wars,” he added. “The dissociation decision is an essential decision... Lebanon's normal position is to be a state that has the best relations with the Arab countries while rejecting any harm against them. The decision was not taken to remain mere words on paper; whoever signs a decision taken by the state must respect this decision,” Hariri went on to say, referring to a government resolution that reaffirmed Lebanon's commitment to distance itself from regional conflicts.
The resolution was issued in the wake of Hariri's return to Lebanon following his resignation ordeal in Saudi Arabia. “We have dedicated ourselves to serving our country. This is our destiny and Lebanon's stability and safety are our most important achievements,” Hariri said. He boasted that despite the raging conflicts in the region, Lebanon is “still in the safety zone.” “Rafik Hariri's spirit is still with us and the young man (Rafik Hariri) who risked his life seeking a ceasefire in Beirut cannot accept a new civil war in Beirut,” Hariri added. “Thirteen years have passed and we are still determined to achieve justice. We will not despair, we will not forget and we will not bargain. The justice of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon is coming,” the premier said, referring to a U.N.-backed tribunal that is trying in absentia four Hizbullah suspects accused of involvement in his father's murder.
He stressed that the court's verdicts should be “binding for the Lebanese authorities, which must pursue and arrest the accused.” Turning to the upcoming parliamentary elections, the premier noted that “the real political and electoral battle will be between al-Mustaqbal Movement and Hizbullah.”“We do not have money for elections and we are a movement that rejects any alliance with Hizbullah,” Hariri underlined, urging Mustaqbal's popular base to play an effective role in the elections. Hitting out at former allies-turned-rivals who “criticize al-Mustaqbal Movement on daily basis,” the premier added: “Let everyone know that I, Saad Rafik Hariri, will categorically reject to lead this loyal and noble popular base into the abyss or into any civil strife.”“Let all people know that we will not accept to waste the martyrs' sacrifices by allowing the country to collapse,” Hariri stressed. Referring to former allies who accuse him of bowing to Hizbullah, Hariri said: “They are fighting wars on paper.” “Some people were friends but they strayed off the path of friendship by seeking roles inside and outside the country and writing stances and reports against Saad Hariri and al-Mustaqbal Movement,” he added, in reference to his resignation crisis.

Tillerson to Urge Neutrality in Lebanon, Propose Offshore Gas Settlement
Naharnet/February 14/18/U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson will stress during his Thursday visit to Lebanon the need for the country to abide by a policy of neutrality towards regional conflicts in order to guarantee continued support from the international community for its security and sovereignty, a media report said. As for the latest territorial and maritime border disputes between Lebanon and Israel, the top U.S. diplomat will call on Lebanon to “exclusively resort to the United Nations to defend its sovereignty,” al-Joumhouria newspaper quoted diplomatic sources in Washington and Beirut as saying. Tillerson will say that Lebanon “should maintain its traditional policy of seeking diplomatic action before resorting to violence,” the sources said. He will also urge the Lebanese state to “distance itself from Hizbullah because the international community led by the U.S. is determined to continue imposing sanctions on the party until it abides by the international and Lebanese legitimate authorities.”In this regard, Tillerson will announce that Lebanon can continue to count on the U.S. and the international community as long as it commits to the relevant U.N. conventions and resolutions. Sources informed on the negotiations over the territorial and maritime borders meanwhile told al-Joumhouria that the Lebanese side “has prepared a unified stance that will be told to Tillerson.”Lebanese officials will tell the U.S. visitor that Lebanon “will not accept to negotiate on the offshore (gas and oil) blocks as per former U.S. envoy Frederick Hoff's suggestion that Lebanon get 55% of the Exclusive Economic Zone,” the sources said. “Tillerson will try to convince Lebanese officials to accept 55% of Blocks 8, 9 and 10 according to the border line demarcated with Cyprus which ends at Point (1),” the sources added, noting that Lebanon “wants the demarcation line to end at Point (23) in line with international maps and its maritime rights that are documented with the U.N.”

Tillerson Says Hizbullah Part of Political Process in Lebanon
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 14/18/U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on Wednesday conceded that Iran-backed Hizbullah is part of the "political process" in Lebanon, appearing to soften Washington's tone ahead of his Thursday visit to the country. "We support a free, democratic Lebanon free of influence of others, and we know that Lebanese Hizbullah is influenced by Iran. This is influence that we think is unhelpful in Lebanon’s long-term future," Tillerson said at a press conference in Jordan. "We also have to acknowledge the reality that they also are part of the political process in Lebanon," he added. Tillerson also called on Iran, Hizbullah's regional backer, to withdraw its forces and militias from Syria. Hizbullah has sent thousands of fighters into Syria to bolster President Bashar al-Assad's forces against an Islamist-led uprising. Hizbullah -- the only faction to have retained a huge arsenal of weapons after Lebanon's civil war -- is a member of the Lebanese government of Prime Minister Saad Hariri. Despite being branded a "terrorist" organization by the United States and targeted with economic sanctions, Hizbullah has risen to play a decisive role in regional conflicts including Syria. The U.S. Justice Department in January announced the creation of a special task force to investigate what it called "narcoterrorism" by the powerful movement. The United States levied sanctions in early February against six individuals and seven business with alleged links to Hizbullah financier Adham Tabaja. The group's influence was last year at the heart of a political crisis in Lebanon that saw Hariri quit -- and then later rescind his resignation -- amid a tug-of-war between regional titans Iran and Saudi Arabia. In the wake of the crisis Lebanon's political players -- including Hizbullah -- agreed to stick to the country's official policy of "disassociation" to stay out of regional conflicts. Tillerson is due to meet Lebanon's political leadership Thursday as part of a tour of the Middle East.

Farrell Says STL Trying Individuals Not Parties, Offers Help in Tueni, Gemayel Cases

Naharnet/February 14/18/The Prosecutor of the U.N.-backed Special Tribunal for Lebanon, Norman Farrell, pointed out Wednesday that the tribunal is not trying political parties, organizations or states but rather individuals. Speaking during an STL-organized meeting with journalists in The Hague, Farrell noted that the court does not have jurisdiction, so far, to look into the assassinations of MP Gebran Tueni, industry minister Pierre Gemayel and other figures who were murdered after Hariri's assassination. He, however, added that the STL can establish jurisdiction over the cases should it discover links to Hariri's case. The Prosecutor also announced that the court is willing to help Lebanese authorities in the investigations. As for the new indictment that he filed with the Pre-Trial Judge in July 2017, Farrell told journalists that he cannot unveil its content before its confirmation by the judge. Noting that he is convinced of the evidence he cited in his case, the Prosecutor revealed that he has managed to verify the involvement of three phone lines in activities linked to monitoring Hariri's movement prior to the bomb attack. Farrell also noted that Hizbullah's declaration that its former military commander Mustafa Badreddine had been killed in combat in Syria verifies that he had a strong military experience, which would strengthen the Prosecution's argument rather than weaken it. The STL had on February 7 announced that the Prosecutor had completed the presentation of evidence, marking the conclusion of the prosecution case. Since the start of the Prosecution case, the Prosecution has presented evidence from over 260 individual witnesses and about 2,470 exhibits in documentary form, the STL said. “On 20 and 21 February, the Trial Chamber will hear the Rule 167 submissions of the Defense, any response from the Prosecution and any reply from the Defense. A judgment of acquittal or a decision dismissing the application will be delivered in court as soon as practicable thereafter,” the court added. The Ayyash et al. case relates to the February 14, 2005 attack which killed 22 individuals, including former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, and injured 226 others. The Accused Salim Jamil Ayyash, Hassan Habib Merhi, Hussein Hassan Oneissi and Assad Hassan Sabra remain at large. The proceedings against them are being held in absentia. On July 11, 2016, the Appeals Chamber ordered the termination of the proceedings against slain Hizbullah commander Mustafa Badreddine. The trial is making it possible for the Lebanese people to see evidence being presented and challenged, as well as witnesses testifying and being cross-examined in public. Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has dismissed the court as a U.S.-Israeli scheme and vowed that the accused will never be found.

Head of Defense Office Francois Roux Leaving the STL

Naharnet/February 14/18/The Head of the Defense Office of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, François Roux, is leaving the Tribunal on March 1, 2018, the STL said on Wednesday. “Mr. Roux has not been reappointed due to the fact that he has passed the retirement age set at 65 by the STL Staff Rules and Regulations,” the tribunal explained in a statement. Roux joined the STL on March 9, 2009, after 38 years of “distinguished legal practice before national and international courts and tribunals,” the STL said. The STL is the first international tribunal to have a Defense Office as an organ that is equal in standing to the other three – Chambers, the Office of the Prosecutor and the Registry. The purpose of the establishment of the Defense Office was to “strengthen the protection of the rights of the defense and to provide support and assistance to defense counsel,” the STL said in its Wednesday statement. “During Mr. Roux’s tenure, the STL Defense Office developed into a strong and fully functioning organ, unique in the international legal landscape,” the STL added. The Tribunal’s President Judge Ivana Hrdličková lauded Roux’s contribution saying: “Francois Roux went to an enormous effort to make the Defense Office at the STL – a novelty amongst international criminal tribunals upon its creation – a fully independent, highly professional organ, dedicated to promoting the equality of arms in judicial proceedings and to ensure that it became a landmark institution for international criminal justice.” The Tribunal’s Prosecutor Norman Farrell commended Roux for his contribution to STL's work, wishing him “best of luck for his future projects.”The Tribunal’s Registrar Daryl Mundis joined the STL President and the Prosecutor in commending Roux and added the following: “The Defense Office under the leadership and guidance of Mr. Roux has contributed to the work of the tribunal by providing solid support to the defense teams as they contribute to the critical fact-finding role undertaken by the judges. The values which Mr. Roux fought tirelessly for over many years and around the world will be carried forward by countless advocates who learned from him and who form an important part of his legacy.”Following Roux’s departure and in accordance with Article 13 of the STL Statute, the United Nations Secretary-General, in consultation with the President of the Special Tribunal, will appoint the new Head of the Defense Office.

Report: STL to Issue Verdict in Hariri Trial in Spring 2019
Naharnet/February 14/18/The verdict in ex-PM Rafik Hariri's assassination trial is expected to be issued in the spring of 2019, Special Tribunal for Lebanon sources told LBCI TV on Wednesday. Defense lawyers for the accused Salim Ayyash and Hassan Merhi meanwhile announced that they have exhibits to refute the telecom data evidence that the Prosecution used to build its case, noting that the evidence they have could divert the accusations to parties other than Hizbullah. LBCI said the lawyers were speaking during an STL forum for journalists in The Hague.The director of the office of the STL President meanwhile noted that the proceedings and trial have been running for several years now because the gathering and analysis of telecom data evidence consumes a long time. He also pointed out that telecom data evidence has rarely been used in international courts. MTV meanwhile reported that a journalist “surprised everyone by announcing that he has received an email from one of the accused during a media meeting with STL Defense teams.” “There is ambiguity and conflicting accounts in the evidence submitted by the Prosecution and we have our own pieces of evidence. We will defend the accused who are innocent until proven guilty,” MTV quoted the lawyers as saying. The STL had on February 7 announced that the Prosecutor had completed the presentation of evidence, marking the conclusion of the prosecution case. Since the start of the Prosecution case, the Prosecution has presented evidence from over 260 individual witnesses and about 2,470 exhibits in documentary form, the STL said. “On 20 and 21 February, the Trial Chamber will hear the Rule 167 submissions of the Defense, any response from the Prosecution and any reply from the Defense. A judgment of acquittal or a decision dismissing the application will be delivered in court as soon as practicable thereafter,” the court added. The Ayyash et al. case relates to the February 14, 2005 attack which killed 22 individuals, including former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, and injured 226 others. The Accused Salim Jamil Ayyash, Hassan Habib Merhi, Hussein Hassan Oneissi and Assad Hassan Sabra remain at large. The proceedings against them are being held in absentia. On July 11, 2016, the Appeals Chamber ordered the termination of the proceedings against slain Hizbullah commander Mustafa Badreddine. The trial is making it possible for the Lebanese people to see evidence being presented and challenged, as well as witnesses testifying and being cross-examined in public. Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has dismissed the court as a U.S.-Israeli scheme and vowed that the accused will never be found.

ISF, State Security Officers Held for Aiding Drug Dealers
Naharnet/February 14/18/Three officers and a non-commissioned officer from the Internal Security Forces and a State Security officer have been detained on charges of offering services to some drug dealers, media reports said.
Al-Akhbar newspaper said the officers are accused of “transporting in their military vehicles a number of fugitives wanted on drug dealing charges in order to facilitate their crossing of security checkpoints.” “They were being paid hefty sums of money in return for their transportation services,” the daily added. “Some of them have confessed to accepting bribes to cover up for the fugitives, while one of the officers has insisted that he had not accepted any amount of money,” al-Akhbar said. It identified the officers as First Lieutenant Toufic A., First Lieutenant Mohammed M., First Lieutenant Fadl A. and Major George B., saying they have all confessed to offering services to a number of drug dealers.

Harb: I prayed with Sfeir lest today's commemoration turns into tears on a glorious page in the history of independent Lebanon
Wed 14 Feb 2018/NNA - In a statement issued Wednesday by MP Boutros Harb marking the 13th commemoration of Martyr PM Rafic Hariri's assassination, he said, "I visited Lebanon's great Patriarch, Nasrallah Butros Sfeir, to check on his health and prayed with him that the spirit of the Cedar Revolution and its principles, embodied on February 14 and consolidated through the movement of March 14 that liberated Lebanon, would never wither and die...and so that today's commemoration would not turn into mourning and tears on a glorious page in the history of a free and independent Lebanon...after the lovers of freedom got dispersed in search of political, partisan and sectarian interests, and after it failed to achieve its goals of building a state of law and right, and after personal interests took the place of principles...""On the commemoration of Martyr PM Rafic Hariri's assassination, I did not find any better way to express my feelings of returning to the source of the Cedar Revolution and the patron of the Qornet Shehwan Gathering, which triggered the spark of liberation and restored sovereignty to the country away from Syrian hegemony," Harb added.
"God's mercy be upon the soul of Rafic Hariri," he concluded.

Mikati says he is working to form an integrated electoral list to include Tripoli, Dinnieh, Minnieh
Wed 14 Feb 2018/NNA - Former Prime Minister Najib Mikati reiterated Wednesday his determination to run in the upcoming parliamentary elections with a comprehensive, integrated electoral list of candidates from Tripoli, Dinnieh and Minnieh, a ballot list that "reflects the true fabric of the region and expresses the concerns of citizens."Speaking in a cultural event held in Tripoli, Mikati called on all Lebanese to carry out their respective roles in the upcoming parliamentary elections, urging citizens to give their preferential vote to the candidate they deem most suitable and with a proven history of social and national service.
On the other hand and marking the 13th commemoration of Martyr Rafic Hariri's assassination, Mikati paid tribute to the memory of the late Prime Minister, saying, "We cannot but recall this remarkable man, whose image and fingerprints are still vivid and alive in every region of Lebanon."
"We emphasize that the path he (late Martyr) had taken was the right path, especially at the developmental level, which has contributed to the building of a modern state in Lebanon," Mikati added. "We are entrusted with Lebanon, our eternal homeland, a nation of coexistence, in which we must accept one another and live together side by side," Mikati underscored.

Haber: Hezbollah Seeking to Tighten Its Grip on Lebanese State
Kataeb.org/Wednesday 14th February 2018, 01:38 (EET) Haber: Hezbollah Seeking to Kataeb MP Fadi Haber on Wednesday sounded the alarm over Hezbollah's scheme to tighten its grip on the Lebanese state, warning that said group is trying to impose whatever it wants on the state institutions.
"That is something that we cannot tolerate under any circumstances. This party is running its own state at the expense of the Lebanese state," Haber said. The lawmaker blasted the installation of a telecoms network belonging to Hezbollah in the Chouf town of Al-Rmeileh as well as the repeated violations of the UN Security Council Resolution 1701 in south Lebanon.
 
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 14-15/18
17 dead in shooting at Florida high school
Dylan Stableford/yahoo/February 14/18/A gunman opened fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High school in Parkland, Fla., on Wednesday, killing 17 people and injuring at least a dozen others, the Broward County Sheriff’s Office said. The shooting suspect, a former student identified by police as Nikolas Cruz, was taken into custody in nearby Coral Springs. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said Cruz wore a gas mask, had smoke grenades and set off the school’s fire alarm before opening fire.

Tillerson signs $6.4bn funding package with Jordan
REUTERS/Wednesday 14 February 2018
AMMAN: The US’ work on a new Middle East peace plan is “fairly well advanced,” Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said on Wednesday during a visit to Jordan to sign a five-year $6.4 billion aid package. Tillerson said President Donald Trump would decide when to announce the peace plan. But he provided no details on the initiative, which comes amid deep Palestinian skepticism about US intentions. The US infuriated even its Arab allies in December when Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and initiated the move of the US Embassy from Tel Aviv. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said he would not cooperate with the US in its efforts as a mediator. “I have seen the (administration’s peace) plan... It’s been under development for a number of months. I have consulted with them on the plan, identified areas that we feel need further work. I will say it’s fairly well advanced...” Tillerson said.
There has been little detail on the plan so far. Officials told Reuters in December it would deal with all major issues, including Jerusalem, borders, security, the future of Jewish settlements on occupied land and the fate of Palestinian refugees, and would also urge Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states to provide significant financial support to the Palestinians.
The plan is being crafted by a team led by Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, and US Middle East envoy Jason Greenblatt, both of whom have traveled to key regional capitals since the Trump administration came to office. Palestinians have grown increasingly concerned that any plan Trump unveils will shortchange them, a fear exacerbated by his move on Jerusalem, which upended decades of US policy that the status of the ancient city must be decided in negotiations. Jerusalem is home to sites holy to Muslims, Jews and Christians. Jordanian King Abdullah’s Hashemite dynasty is the custodian of the Muslim holy sites, making Amman particularly sensitive to any changes of status there.  The king has warned that Trump’s decision could undermine stability and fuel radicalism. Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Al-Safadi reiterated on Wednesday that a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was the “only solution we believe can work.” The Trump administration has said it would back a two-state solution if the parties agreed to it. Trump had threatened to cut off financial aid to countries that backed a UN resolution calling for Washington to reverse its Jerusalem decision. Jordan backed the resolution.
But the Trump administration has courted King Abdullah, a moderate pro-Western Arab leader whose kingdom has long upheld US interests in the region.
On Tuesday, Tillerson met the king at his residence where the two emphasized strong US-Jordanian ties. Commenting on the memorandum of understanding signed for $6.375 billion in aid, the US State Department said: “(It) highlights the pivotal role Jordan plays in helping foster and safeguard regional stability and supports US objectives such as the global campaign to defeat ISIS (Daesh), counter-terrorism cooperation, and economic development.”Conflicts in neighboring Syria and Iraq have damaged Jordan’s economy, forcing it to borrow heavily from external and domestic sources. Jordan has been an important part of the US-led coalition battling Daesh in Iraq and Syria. Tillerson is also expected this week to visit Turkey, with which US ties have become badly strained over Washington’s support for the Kurdish YPG militia in Syria, regarded by Ankara as a terrorist group. Tillerson said Washington had to “find a way to continue to work in the same direction.”He also expressed concern over Saturday’s confrontation between Israel and “Iranian assets” in Syria. Syrian air defenses shot down an Israeli F-16 jet after it bombed a site used by Iran-backed forces in Syria. Tillerson said Iran should withdraw its forces and militias from Syria, where Tehran backs President Bashar Assad. Responding to the comments, a senior Iranian official, Ali Akbar Velayati, said Iran’s military presence in Syria was legitimate and based on an invitation from Damascus. He called on US forces to leave Syria.

Shooting outside U.S. Top Spy Headquarters
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 14/18/A shooting erupted Wednesday outside the headquarters of the National Security Agency, a secretive intelligence organization responsible for global U.S. electronic eavesdropping in the suburbs of Washington, the White House confirmed. NBC News aired aerial images of what appeared to be police surrounding a man on the ground in handcuffs outside the NSA facility in Fort Meade, Maryland. The local ABC affiliate reported that three people were injured and a suspect was arrested. A black SUV appeared to have crashed into a concrete barrier surrounding the site, and bullet holes were visible in the vehicle's front windows. The NSA said the situation was under control. "The president has been briefed on the shooting at Ft. Meade," the White House said in a statement. "Our thoughts and prayers are with everyone that has been affected."

Netanyahu Rejects Calls to Resign after Police Seek Indictment
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 14/18/Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected calls to step down Wednesday after police recommended his indictment for corruption, the biggest challenge yet to the right-wing premier's long tenure in power. Netanyahu again came out swinging on Wednesday morning, harshly criticizing the police investigation against him while making clear he has no intention of resigning. His governing coalition, seen as the most right-wing in Israeli history, appears firm for now, but reactions from key members in the coming days will be watched closely for signs of fissures. "I can reassure you that the coalition is stable," Netanyahu said at an event in Tel Aviv. "Neither me nor anyone else has plans for elections. We're going to continue to work together for the good of Israeli citizens until the end of the term." Netanyahu, prime minister for a total of nearly 12 years, also harshly denounced the police recommendations against him as "full of holes, like Swiss cheese."He said the police report "misleads" and is "contrary to the truth and logic."Police recommended on Tuesday that he be indicted for bribery, fraud and breach of public trust after a long-running investigation. The attorney general must now decide how to move forward with the case, a process that could take months. A prime minister facing such police recommendations or who has been formally charged is not obliged to resign. As it became clear police were to issue the recommendations on Tuesday night, Netanyahu gave a televised address to the nation, proclaiming his innocence and criticizing the police. Ministers close to him also defended Netanyahu.
'Undermine the police'
Avi Gabbay, leader of the opposition Labor party, said the "Netanyahu era is over" and called on him to step down. "He is unworthy to continue to be prime minister of Israel. It's very simple," Gabbay said in a video interview with the Ynet news site. Tzipi Livni, part of the main opposition Zionist Union alliance that also includes Labor, criticised what she called a campaign to undermine the police. But at the same time, a key coalition minister made clear on Wednesday he was remaining in the government, though he also criticized Netanyahu's behavior. "A prime minister is not meant to be perfect or live an over-modest lifestyle, but he needs to be someone people look at and say: 'This is how one should act'," Education Minister Naftali Bennett said in a speech in Tel Aviv. "Taking gifts in large sums over a long period of time is not living up to this standard," he added, while stressing Netanyahu was innocent until proven guilty and that he would wait for the attorney general's decision. Bennett, who has ambitions to be prime minister, heads the far-right party Jewish Home, which holds eight seats in parliament.
Netanyahu's coalition controls 66 out of 120 seats in total.
Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon, whose center-right Kulanu party controls 10 seats, will also be among those facing tough questions over whether he will stick with Netanyahu. Police have been investigating Netanyahu over suspicions that he and his family received expensive gifts from Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan and Australian billionaire James Packer.The gifts allegedly included pricey cigars, jewelery and champagne. The total value of the gifts received between 2007 and 2016 is estimated at around one million shekels (229,000 euros, $283,000), according to police.
They have also been probing allegations Netanyahu sought a secret deal for favorable coverage with the publisher of top-selling newspaper Yediot Aharonot. Police recommended indicting Milchan and the publisher, Arnon Moses, with bribery as well.
Quid pro quo?
The 68-year-old premier has been questioned seven times by police over the allegations and has called the investigation an attempt by political opponents to force him from office. Police said Netanyahu had been suspected of trying to help Milchan receive tax benefits in Israel, of assisting him in receiving a visa in the United States and of promoting his business interests. Milchan, who is Israeli, has produced many films, including the blockbuster "Pretty Woman."While an indictment alone would not legally oblige Netanyahu to resign, he would likely face mounting pressure to do so. He would be legally forced to step down if he were convicted and all appeals were exhausted. He has already faced a series of large protests in Tel Aviv over the corruption cases. Netanyahu's time as premier is fast approaching Israel's revered founding father David Ben-Gurion's 13 years. He first held the office from 1996-1999 before returning to power in 2009.

Key Israel Minister Criticizes Netanyahu, but Staying in Coalition
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 14/18/A key member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition criticized the premier's behavior on Wednesday after police recommended his indictment for corruption but said he would remain in the government. "A prime minister is not meant to be perfect or live an over-modest lifestyle, but he needs to be someone people look at and say: 'This is how one should act'," Education Minister Naftali Bennett said in a speech in Tel Aviv. "Taking gifts in large sums over a long period of time is not living up to this standard," he added, while stressing Netanyahu was innocent until proven guilty. Bennett heads the far-right party Jewish Home, which holds eight seats in parliament. Netanyahu's coalition controls 66 out of 120 seats in total. The education minister has ambitions to be prime minister, but he made clear he was remaining in Netanyahu's coalition for now and would wait for the attorney general to decide how to move forward with the case. "Some claim the prime minister cannot manage the country under the stress of investigations, but I do not see this," he said. "We have a good government, dealing with security, economy and everything else. Replacing it should be done at the voting station."

Tillerson Meets Syria Opposition in Amman
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 14/18/U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson met Syrian opposition negotiators in Jordan Wednesday for closed-door talks in the wake of a January peace summit hosted by regime backer Russia. The opposition and Kurdish groups had boycotted the congress, held just days after a ninth round of United Nations-led talks in Vienna failed to yield progress towards ending Syria's devastating conflict. The West views Russia's Syria peace efforts with suspicion, concerned that Moscow is seeking to sideline the U.N. process.
But the U.S. acting assistant secretary of state, David Satterfield, said Wednesday that the fallout had been limited. "We got in the end a communique which validated the U.N. role," Satterfield said before Tillerson's meeting in Amman. "So this game, this theater that was Sochi... finally came out in a way that did no damage." Despite Moscow insisting Syrian society would be fully represented at Sochi, almost all of the 1,400 delegates were pro-regime. They agreed to set up a commission to re-write the country's post-war constitution. About 150 Syrian civil society groups accused the U.N. of rewarding Russia by dispatching its special envoy Staffan de Mistura to the congress. Syria's war has killed more than 340,000 people and displaced millions since it began in March 2011 with the brutal repression of anti-government protests.

At Least 19 Migrants Killed in Libya Truck Crash

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 14/18/At least 19 migrants were killed on Wednesday and more than 100 injured when the truck transporting them crashed in Libya, a hospital said. More than 300 migrants, mostly Eritrean and Somali nationals, were on board the vehicle which overturned near the town of Bani Walid. A child was among at least 19 migrants killed in the accident, the head of the town's hospital, Salah al-Mabrouk, told AFP. The hospital, which had earlier given a toll of 23 dead, said at least 124 migrants were injured and it was struggling to cope.
"Several victims are even being treated on the ground," said spokesman Salah al-Twijer. Since the 2011 overthrow and killing of longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi, chaos-wracked Libya has become a key gateway for migrants trying to reach Europe, often on unseaworthy vessels. Bani Walid, on the edge of the desert 170 kilometers (110 miles) southeast of the capital Tripoli, is a transit point for migrants heading to the Mediterranean coast.

US school shooting leaves 20-50 hurt, assailant ‘still at large’
AFP/Wednesday 14 February 2018
MIAMI: Police launched a manhunt on Wednesday for a shooter who opened fire at a high school in Florida, reportedly leaving between 20 and 50 people injured, officials said.The shooting took place at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, a city in the southern part of the state between Boca Raton and Fort Lauderdale. The Margate Fire Department told CBS Miami there were between 20 and 50 victims. The extent of the injuries was unclear. “AVOID THE AREA,” the Broward County sheriff’s office said on Twitter. “There are reports of victims,” the sheriff’s office said. “Shooter still at large.” Television images showed students being led out of the school by heavily armed police officers and an armored vehicle filled with a SWAT team arriving at the scene. One injured victim was seen being placed into an ambulance on a stretcher. Police officers in helmets, bulletproof vests and armed with automatic weapons could be seen stationed at several points around the school. “What happened was that the fire bell rang and we all thought it was a drill because we had already had a fire drill,” an unidentified student told WSVN 7 News. “We thought it’s another drill so we didn’t take it seriously and then we heard pops from the other side of the school,” the student said. Police from neighboring Coral Springs advised teachers and students in the building to “remain barricaded inside until police reach you. A local television reporter he had been in touch via text message with one female student who told him she had taken refuge in a closet with a number of classmates. The teen told the reporter that she had heard a noise that “sounded like a bomb,” and a drama teacher had then told the pupils to huddle inside the closet. “Everyone inside is very scared, it’s very warm,” the student was quoted as saying. “My prayers and condolences to the families of the victims of the terrible Florida shooting,” President Donald Trump said on Twitter. “No child, teacher or anyone else should ever feel unsafe in an American school.” Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, part of the Broward County public school district, has nearly 3,000 students, according to 2014 figures. The shooting, one of several since the start of the year, will once again throw the spotlight on America’s epidemic of gun violence and the ready accessibility of weapons, with 33,000 gun-related deaths annually. Since January 2013, “there have been at least 283 school shootings across the country — which averages out to one school shooting a week,” according to Everytown for Gun Safety, a non-profit group that advocates for gun control. Since the 2012 massacre at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, where 20 children and six adults were shot dead, warning procedures and emergency drills have multiplied at US schools. The goal is to teach school children how to react to a shooter who opens fire at random.
 
King Salman discusses Syrian situation in a call with Putin
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 14 February 2018 /The Kremlin said on Wednesday that Saudi king Salman and Russian president Putin discussed the situation in Syria over a phone call. King Salman and Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed as well the means to further expand fruitful cooperation in global oil markets, the Kremlin said. The statement did not offer any details on what that expanded coordination could entail. Russia and Saudi Arabia are major players in a global pact on cutting oil output. The two leaders also discussed Syria and defense sales, the statement said. It said the Saudi king had expressed his condolences to Putin regarding a plane crash at the weekend near Moscow that killed all 71 passengers and crew. (With Reuters)

Government pay P5,000 in cash gifts to repatriated Filipinos from Kuwait
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 14 February 2018/The Philippines has said that repatriated overseas Filipino workers from Kuwait will receive he will receive $95 (P5,000) in financial assistance and an additional $383 (P20,000) in alternative aid. The financial assistance was announced by Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque Jr. and that the Philippines government is exhausting efforts to attend to the needs of repatriated Filipino migrant workers. “The missions all over the Middle East in particular have been instructed to sign alternative employment for our kababayans who have opted for voluntary repatriation from Kuwait,” Roque was quoted by Filipino daily Sun Star Manila. The Philippines Monday expanded a ban on its citizens working in Kuwait after President Rodrigo Duterte angrily lashed out at the Gulf state over reports of Filipino workers suffering abuse and exploitation. Filipino workers who were repatriated from Kuwait take part in a dialogue with a Department of Labour official in Paranaque. (Reuters) Authorities say 252,000 Filipinos work in Kuwait, many as maids. They are among over two million employed in the region, whose remittances are a lifeline to the Philippine economy.
The fresh move came after Duterte last month barred Filipinos from seeking work in Kuwait, although the ban exempted those who had already secured permission. Last Friday Duterte hit out at Kuwait as he brandished photos reportedly of a Filipina maid found in a freezer, saying she had been “roasted like a pig”.

Yemeni army kills 40 Houthis advancing near Midi front

Hani al-Sufayan, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 14 February 2018/Dozens of Houthi militants were killed on Wednesday after fierce clashes with Yemen's national army supported by coalition fighters in the district of Midi west of Hajjah. Al Arabiya correspondent in Yemen said that 40 elements of the Houthis were killed in raids by the coalition fighters in Midi Front, to support the movement of the National Army forces. A military source confirmed that a number of sites and machinery belonging to the Houthis were accurately hit, especially in the western neighborhoods where the militias are still stationed.
The Yemeni army forces on Tuesday liberated several new strategic locations north of the southern province of Lahj, after clashes with the Houthi militia. The Yemeni army tightened its control of the strategic mountain of Shivan in the Karash district of Qubaytah governorate north of Lahj province. It will continue to advance towards the Al-Shuraijah area south towards Taiz governorate, amid huge losses among Houthi militants.

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan carry out joint naval training
SPA, RiyadhTuesday, 13 February 2018/A joint naval training of the Royal Saudi Navy and the Pakistan Navy, ‘Sea Breeze-11’ and ‘Coastal Shield-4’, was underway in the Arabian Gulf waters at the King Abdulaziz naval base.
The director of training, Brigadier General Sajir bin Raffid al-Enezi, said that during the training, many joint operations are carried out between Saudi Arabian and Pakistani naval vessels.These include submarine training and handling, landing operations on ships, vertical flights, refueling operations and rocket firing at fixed and mobile targets.

Abu Dhabi court to hear appeal in rape and murder of 11-year-old boy
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 14 February 2018/ The Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal will reconvene for the second time to consider the appeal of the death penalty verdict issued last year to a 33-year-old Pakistani man. The man found guilty of raping and killing his nephew in 2017 was sentenced to death. The Abu Dhabi Criminal Court found the man guilty of raping and murdering 11-year-old Azan Majid Janjua, whose body was found on the rooftop of the building in the UAE capital where his family lived. The court also sentenced the man to pay blood money to the boy’s relatives. The killer had lured the boy to the rooftop while dressed in a burka, CCTV images from the building revealed.2

Kuwait to give $2 billion in loans, investments for Iraq
Reuters/Wednesday, 14 February 2018/Kuwait’s Emir said it would lend $1 billion and commit a further $1 billion of investments to Iraq, joining a group of international backers that have this week pledged funds to bolster the country’s recovery. Donors and investors have gathered in Kuwait to discuss efforts to rebuild Iraq’s economy and infrastructure as it emerges from a devastating conflict with ISIS militants who seized almost a third of the country. “Kuwait will earmark $1 billion in loans to Iraq and will commit to another $1 billion as investments,” Emir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jaber al-Sabah told an international conference on Wednesday. Minutes later, the European Union’s foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said the bloc would invest 400 million euros, in addition to individual contributions from member states. The United States said on Tuesday it was extending a $3 billion credit line but has not provided any direct government assistance. International NGOs have so far pledged $330 million in humanitarian assistance. Those sums are dwarfed by the more than $88 billion that Iraqi officials have said it will cost to rebuild the country after three years of war, with housing a particular priority. Iraq, which still owes Kuwait reparations from the Gulf War, declared victory over ISIS in December, having taken back all the territory the militant group captured in 2014 and 2015. Its fighters have also been largely defeated in neighboring Syria. On Wednesday, the United Nations launched a two-year Recovery and Resilience program designed to help Iraq’s government fast-track the social dimensions of reconstruction. “It will revitalize areas that are at risk of violence, and support broad political participation and inclusive social development,” UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said. “The ...program will help those who have suffered most.” The reconstruction conference is taking place two weeks before Kuwait celebrates its Liberation Day from Iraq. Iraq invaded in 1990, leading to defeat by a US-led coalition and more than a decade of sanctions. Iraq’s reparations payments were suspended in 2014 after the ISIS takeover but have resumed, and Baghdad is set to hand over 0.5 percent of its oil proceeds in 2018 and escalate annually until the end of 2021 in order to pay off a remaining $4.6 billion owed to Kuwait.

Canada offers condolences following death of Mr. Seyed-Emami
February 14, 2018 – Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
The Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today issued the following statement:
“We offer our deepest condolences to the loved ones of Mr. Seyed-Emami. We are seriously concerned by the situation surrounding the detention and death of Mr. Seyed-Emami.
“We have expressed our concerns to the Government of Iran and will continue to do so.
“A Canadian has died. We expect the Government of Iran to provide information and answers into the circumstances surrounding this tragedy. I have asked to speak with my counterpart to seek information on what has transpired. We will continue to use every means at Canada’s disposal to seek further information.”

Foreign Affairs Minister to address global security issues at Munich Security Conference
February 14, 2018 - Ottawa, Canada - Global Affairs Canada
The Government of Canada strongly believes that diplomacy and multilateral engagement are key to finding durable solutions to major international challenges.
The Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today announced that she will attend the 54th Munich Security Conference, from February 16 to 17, 2018, in Munich, Germany.
At the conference, the Minister will engage with partners and allies to explore lasting diplomatic solutions to large-scale global security challenges, such as the North Korea crisis, the deteriorating situation in Venezuela and Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and destabilizing activities in Ukraine.
The Minister will deliver remarks on Canada’s unwavering commitment to supporting and strengthening an international rules-based order.
The Minister will also participate in a discussion on women and Africa, during which leaders will explore ways of further collaboration with women, peace and security partners. Putting women at the core of foreign policy decisions empowers them to become agents of change that build and sustain peaceful, secure and resilient communities.
Quotes
“The current international security environment is more complex and challenging than ever before, transcending borders and affecting us all. Canada will continue to work with its international partners and allies to find durable solutions to major international crises, in keeping with Canada’s core values of respect for human rights, gender equality, the rule of law and protection of minorities.”
- Hon. Chrystia Freeland, P.C., M.P., Minister of Foreign Affairs
Quick facts
Since its founding in 1963, the Munich Security Conference in Germany has become a premier event for international security policy dialogue.
Each year, the Munich Security Conference brings together world leaders, ministers, parliamentarians, government officials, senior military officers, academics, journalists and other leaders to discuss current and future security challenges. This is Minister Freeland’s second time attending the Munich Security Conference.

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 14-15/18
 Iranian 'winter' coming to northern border, analyst warns

جيروزالم بوست/مصنع صواريخ إيراني في الهرمل وآخر بين صيدا وصور
Anna Ahronheim/Jerusalem Post/February 14/18
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/62587
Iran has created a foothold in Syria that only stands to grow stronger, warns Orit Perlov, an analyst at the Institute for National Security Studies.
Three days after Israel’s first direct confrontation with Iran on its northern border, concern remains over the growing danger posed by the Islamic Republic's growing foothold in the neighborhood.
“Winter is coming from the north where we have a concrete threat,” Orit Perlov, a social media analyst for the Institute for National Security Studies, told The Jerusalem Post in an interview just days before an Israeli F16I was downed over the country by Syrian air defenses.
“We have a factory for advanced weapons in the north of Lebanon, in Sunni areas,” she said referring to an Iranian-built factory near the town of Hermel in the eastern Bekaa Valley in northern Lebanon.
It can produce the fairly accurate Fateh-110 missile with a range of close to 300 km. with a half-ton warhead.
“In the south, it would be a different story, we could very easily bomb it,” she said, adding that bombing a Shi’ite area would be viewed differently by pragmatic Sunni Gulf states, which behind closed doors, are growing closer to the Jewish state.
According to a report by French online magazine Intelligence Online, another factory is located between the towns of Sidon and Tyre in southern Lebanon, which is capable of producing surface-toair and anti-tank missiles as well as unmanned aerial vehicles able to carry explosives.
Officials have repeatedly voiced concerns over the smuggling of sophisticated weaponry to Hezbollah and the growing Iranian presence on its borders with Syria, stressing that both are redlines for the Jewish state.
Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman has made it clear that while Israel does not want to start a third Lebanon war, the Jewish state is determined to prevent Iran from using Lebanon to produce precision missiles for Hezbollah that will hit deep inside the Israeli home front.
According to IDF assessments, Hezbollah has at least 100,000 short-range rockets and several thousand more missiles that can reach the center of the country.
Hezbollah is able to mobilize close to 30,000 fighters and has flaunted its tunnel system, complete with ventilation, electricity and rocket launchers.
Israel rarely comments on foreign reports of military activity but it has admitted to carrying out thousands of missions, including 100 air strikes in Syria to prevent Hezbollah from obtaining sophisticated weaponry such as precision missiles or technology and know-how from Iran.
It is believed that these strikes are behind Iran’s reasoning to build indigenous underground weapons factories in Lebanon.
While Liberman stated that “the last thing I want is for a third Lebanon war,” Israel is “determined to prevent Lebanon from becoming one large factory for the production of precision missiles.”
And if Israel does try to prevent that, Hezbollah is expected to respond by firing tens of thousands of missiles at the country.
In the case of another war in the north, the IDF believes that it will not be contained to one front but along the entire northern border with both Syria and Lebanon involved.
Senior officials from Israel’s defense establishment have repeatedly stated that while the chance for escalation on the border is small, the smallest incident or a miscalculation by either side may lead to a large-scale and devastating war.
According to Perlov, it’s a dangerous scenario that Israel cannot afford to have.
“We bombed the facility in Deir al-Zor and we didn’t have a war,” she said. “We prefer to do something and only have a minor price to pay. We don’t want another round because we have no end game. With the US giving us the green light we can find ourselves in Beirut, in Ankara – nobody will tell us to stop.”

Iran, Russia, and China's Central Role in the Venezuela Crisis
Joseph M. Humire/Gatestone Institute/February 14/18
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11888/venezuela-iran-russia-china
Prior to any discussion on what to do about Venezuela, a consensus about what led to this crisis needs to be reached. The role of Iran is critical in such a conversation.
As in the Syria conflict, Iran's primary role is preparing the Venezuelan battlefield through a range of operations in irregular warfare, using non-state actors and surrogates to gain influence over the population.
Strong evidence suggest that Venezuela used its immigration agency to provide Venezuelan identities and documents to several hundred, if not thousands, of Middle Easterners. Without proper vetting and verification measures in place, and a high degree of counterintelligence support, our regional allies will not know if Venezuelan refugees spilling across borders are legitimate refugees or members of a transregional clandestine network between Latin America and the Middle East.
Any intervention in Venezuela -- military, humanitarian or otherwise -- will not work unless it is aimed at removing the external influences, especially Iran, Russia and China, that have turned Venezuela into the Syria of the Western Hemisphere.
U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson just completed, by most accounts, a successful visit to Latin America. He began his five-nation tour by invoking the Monroe Doctrine and suggesting the Venezuelan military could manage a "peaceful transition" from the authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro. This reminded several regional observers of President Trump's suggestion last year of a possible "military option" for Venezuela, hinting at possible U.S. or multilateral intervention to stop the country's collapse.
An armed action or military intervention in Venezuela by any nation in the Western Hemisphere, including Venezuela's own military, must take into account the role of Iran, Russia and China in the crisis. Russia and China were prominently mentioned by Tillerson during his visit to the region; Iran, however, was notably absent from his remarks.
Prior to any discussion on what to do about Venezuela, a consensus about what led to this crisis needs be reached. The role of Iran is critical in such a conversation.
Most regional analysts will likely agree that Venezuela has become a Cuban-occupied country. With more than 30,000 Cubans embedded in Venezuela, many of whom are part of the intelligence and security apparatus, it's clear that the Castro brothers had an integral role in the country's collapse. The Cuba narrative, however, misses two key points. First, it fails to identify precisely Cuba's role in Venezuela, and secondly, it ignores the presence and influence of other key extra-regional actors.
Of these, Russia and China are perhaps the two most visible. As in Syria, and historically in Central America, Russia is the primary supplier of lethal military aid, along with financial and technical support to the Venezuelan armed forces. Totaling more than $11 billion in military goods thanks to Russian arms sales, Venezuela represents 75% of Russia's total foreign military sales in the region. Additionally, the Russian state-owned energy firm, Rosneft, has provided Venezuela with an estimated $17 billion in financing since 2006. Moscow has leveraged its collateral deals to acquire expanded stakes in Venezuela's oilfields, namely the heavy-crude Orinoco belt, which gives Russia more control of Venezuela's strategic energy assets.
Russia is not alone in leveraging debt for greater control of strategic assets in Venezuela. According to the International Institute of Finance, China holds more than $23 billion in Venezuela's foreign debt, making it the country's largest creditor. Through these credits and loans, Beijing is the primary benefactor and principal banker to the South American nation, and China has enormous leverage over outcomes in Venezuela.
Chinese energy companies are also gaining an increasing share of Venezuela's most lucrative oil field, the Faja Del Orinoco (FDO). With a 25-year land grant to the FDO, China has secured access to strategic territory in Venezuela; and in exchange, China has used its checkbook to fund many of the Bolivarian Republic's social programs, such as subsidized housing and free medical clinics.
External support from China, Russia, and Cuba has contributed significantly to propping up the Venezuelan government during the last decade. Both Russia and China continue to leverage their financial, military, and energy support to the Maduro regime through Cuba's robust counterintelligence and human intelligence networks, which permeate Venezuela's highest political and military levels. Cuba is indispensable to China and Russia for its operational knowledge of Russian-supplied equipment, along with its longstanding ties to communist clandestine networks.
In this context, it is hard to imagine a scenario that removes Havana's presence from Venezuela without first passing through Moscow or Beijing. Iran, on the other hand, can operate independently in Venezuela because it taps into a separate, more robust clandestine network that has been developing in Latin America for more than half a century.
Approximately 60% of the population of the city of As-Suwayda in southwestern Syria (pop. 139,000, according to the 2004 census) are Venezuelan-born dual citizens. Many more have arrived since 2009. The district of As-Suwayda (same name as the city) has been dubbed "Little Venezuela." Estimates indicate that upwards of 300,000 Syrians from the As-Suwayda Governorate currently live halfway around the world in Venezuela. According to the late Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, more than a million Syrians reside there. This Syria-Venezuela connection could represent a clandestine network managed by Iran and critical to the advancement of Chavez's "Bolivarian revolution."
As in the Syria conflict, Iran's primarily role is preparing the Venezuelan battlefield through a range of operations in irregular warfare, using non-state actors and surrogates to gain influence over the population. Its influence is often not visible on the ground, but is felt through the repression anti-regime of protestors in 2017 and earlier. During anti-Maduro demonstrations, the motorcycle-riding members of the Venezuelan civilian militias known as Collectivos were remarkable for being modeled and trained by Iran's paramilitary Basij militia. The role of the Basij in crushing Iran's Green Revolution in 2009 provided lesson for dealing with anti-regime protestors half a decade later in Venezuela.
The extent of Iran's influence in Venezuela has long been a source of debate for the U.S. and regional security analysts. The Iranian regime's roots as a revolutionary movement with anti-imperialist rhetoric and expanding dominance throughout the Middle East has brought Russia and China, two historic cold war adversaries, closer together. In many ways, Iran has positioned itself in Venezuela to capitalize on China's economic clout and Russia's military footprint. For instance, Iran's Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL) used a variety of joint projects with Venezuela's military industry (CAVIM) as well as Russian and Chinese oil contracts with PDVSA to shield its evasion of international sanctions.
Iran's comparative advantage, however, is in the development of clandestine structures through surrogate forces and proxy networks. Its most prominent proxy force, Lebanese Hezbollah, is known to deploy to global hotspots on behalf of Iran. Meanwhile, the Qods Force (the extra-territorial arm of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps - IRGC) works with Hezbollah to increase social pressure in these hotspots to exacerbate conflicts. The Hezbollah and IRGC-QF cooperation is an important component of the Syrian civil war.
Pictured: Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro visits Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in Iran on October 22, 2016. (Image source: Office of the Supreme Leader of Iran)
In Venezuela, long-standing clandestine networks from Syria, Lebanon and the Middle East are playing a similar role behind the scenes in shaping the narrative and ultimately directing the actions of the country's key players. These networks have provided the Venezuelan regime with the know-how systematically to control the population and dominate the narrative. Their rise to prominence can be seen not only in the abundance of Arabs in the Venezuelan government, but also in the way the Venezuelan crisis has unfolded, following the same pattern of economic and social grievances to violent uprisings with external support. The humanitarian crisis in Venezuela began with severe shortages of food and medicine prompting a legitimate grievance among the population, which lead to an uprising last year. Many forget that prior to the its civil war, Syria faced a severe drought that was a factor in other violent uprisings that began in 2011. As in Syria, Venezuela has become a humanitarian crisis that exacerbates refugee outflows with serious counterterrorism concerns and a strong Russian and Iranian presence. Unlike Syria, however, this crisis rests much closer to U.S. shores.
Strong evidence suggests that Venezuela used its immigration agency (SAIME) to provide Venezuelan identities and documents to several hundred, if not thousands, of Middle Easterners. Without proper vetting and verification measures in place, and a high degree of counterintelligence support, our regional allies will not know if Venezuelan refugees spilling across borders are legitimate refugees or members of a transregional clandestine network between Latin America and the Middle East.
As Secretary Tillerson calls upon regional allies to increase support to resolve Venezuela's humanitarian crisis and apply more pressure to the Maduro regime, it would make sense for the Trump administration also to help U.S. allies by enhancing their counterintelligence and counterterrorism capabilities against Iran and Hezbollah in the Western Hemisphere. It appears that some of this cooperation is already beginning to take place, as evidenced by a new agreement between the U.S. and Argentina to tackle Hezbollah's illicit financing in the Southern Cone.
Dealing with the tragedy that has transpired in Venezuela over more than two decades will require a better public understanding of the central role of extra-regional actors, particularly Iran, in the country's crisis.
Any intervention in Venezuela -- military, humanitarian or otherwise -- will not work unless it is aimed at removing the external influences, especially Iran, Russia and China, that have turned Venezuela into the Syria of the Western Hemisphere.
*Joseph M. Humire is the executive director of the Center for a Secure Free Society (SFS) and a fellow at the Middle East Forum. This article has taken excerpts from a forthcoming special report by Mr. Humire on "Venezuela's Crisis: A New Global Paradigm." You can follow him on Twitter @jmhumire
© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Palestinians: Abbas's Lies and Falling Mask
Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/February 14/18
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11898/palestinians-abbas-lies
For the past two decades, the anti-Israel rhetoric of Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian leadership has radicalized many Palestinians, to a point where they are no longer willing to accept any form of compromise or peace with Israel.
By accusing the Trump administration of hostility to the Palestinians, the Palestinian leadership has delegitimized the US to a degree where many Palestinians now feel that Americans are legitimate targets for violence and terror attacks.
How, exactly, do these condemnations conform with Abbas's other claims that he seeks to resume peace talks with Israel? The mask on Abbas's face has fallen once again. That mask has, in fact, been falling for many years. Perhaps one day the world will even see that.
Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas continues to say one thing to his people, and an entirely different thing to the international community.
To Arab audiences, Abbas describes Israel and the US administration as not far short of Satan incarnate.
When the PA president sends a message to the international community, however, he shows a different face.
Ever since US President Donald Trump's December announcement recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, Abbas and his top aides in Ramallah have been consistently signaling to the Palestinians that the peace process with Israel is "over."
The Palestinians have also been assured by Abbas that Israel and the US will pay dearly for the recognition.
Abbas has promised, among other things, to revoke the PLO recognition of Israel, halt security coordination in the West Bank, and abrogate previous agreements signed between the Palestinians and Israel, beginning with the Oslo Accords.
Two key decision-making bodies, the Fatah Central Council and the PLO Executive Committee, have recommended in recent weeks that the Palestinian leadership endorse these measures. Notably, Abbas chaired the meetings of the two bodies in Ramallah.
The message emerging from the meetings of the Palestinian leaders in Ramallah is that the Palestinians will not "return" to the negotiating table with Israel and that the US administration is an enemy of all Palestinians.
In addition, since Trump's announcement, Abbas and the Palestinian leadership have been waging a massive campaign against the US administration by denouncing it as one of the "most hostile" American governments against the Palestinians in modern history.
One of Abbas's spokesmen, Nabil Abu Rudaineh, has repeatedly accused the Trump administration of "ignorance " and "incitement."
These words come from the mouth of the very Palestinian Authority that has made anti-Israel incitement into its reason for being -- the heart and soul of its propaganda machine. Abbas and his cohorts are among the world's experts in the art of incitement and indoctrination.
For the past two decades, their anti-Israel rhetoric has radicalized many Palestinians to a point where they are no longer willing to accept any form of compromise or peace with Israel.
Now, Abbas and the Palestinian leadership are doing exactly the same to the US and its president.
Recurring Palestinian attacks on Trump's Middle East envoys, David Friedman and Jason Greenblatt, have placed the Americans squarely alongside the Israelis as the mortal enemies of the Palestinians.
It is no wonder, then, that Palestinian thugs attacked US consular officials who came to Bethlehem to discuss ways of helping the Palestinians in various fields. The assault, which took place in late January, is just one sign of growing anti-American sentiments on the Palestinian street.
This hatred is fueled by the ongoing incitement against the US administration being waged by Abbas and many top Palestinian officials. It was only by chance that no one was hurt in the attack in the offices of the Bethlehem Chamber of Commerce.
The Bethlehem incident is an indication of what awaits any US administration official who sets foot in Ramallah or any Palestinian city. If and when Greenblatt ever returns to Ramallah, he will be met with protests, demonstrators, shoes eggs, and possibly more.
By accusing the Trump administration of hostility to the Palestinians, the Palestinian leadership has delegitimized the US to a degree where many Palestinians now feel that Americans are legitimate targets for violence and terror attacks.
The Palestinian media, which is largely controlled by Abbas loyalists, is full of daily attacks (and abuse) against Trump and his administration officials.
Here is how Palestinian tactics work: the same Palestinian Authority whose vicious anti-US rhetoric encourages violence and terrorism also "denounced" the assault on the consular mission in Bethlehem. Additionally, Abbas ordered his security forces briefly to detain the perpetrators, some of whom belong to his ruling Fatah faction. Not surprisingly, their detention drew sharp criticism from many Palestinians.
The Bethlehem incident highlights the precise mechanism of Abbas's bloody propaganda machine, the same one that has for so long trained the minds of Palestinians to commit terrorist acts against Israel.
Abbas's daily condemnations of Israel -- including false allegations that Jews are plotting to defile and destroy Islamic holy sites -- triggered a wave of stabbings and car ramming attacks against Israelis during the past two years -- a tactic copied by terrorists in Europe.
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.
When Abbas faces the international community, however, he shows a different face. Suddenly, the same Abbas who has been telling his people that he will not "return" to the negotiating table and that he is even mulling revoking recognition of Israel sounds like a different person.
During a joint press conference with visiting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi last week, Abbas contradicted himself, saying he had never refused to resume the peace process with Israel. "We are committed to the political process and negotiations," he announced. Abbas also declared that the Palestinians were committed to the "war on terrorism" -- depending, of course, on how one defines "terrorism."
A reminder: This is the same Abbas who has been telling his people in the past few weeks that the peace process is finished. This is the same Abbas whose incendiary rhetoric against Israel and the US has driven Palestinians to violence and terrorism.
Abbas is now telling the world that the US administration is no longer qualified to play the role of "honest broker" in any peace process between the Palestinians and Israel. He is also stating day and night that the time has come to replace the US role with an "international multilateral mechanism." Abbas presumably still hopes to be handed a Palestinian state. Former Secretary of State John Kerry recently advised Abbas to "hold on and be strong... stay strong in his spirit and play for time... and... not yield to President Trump's demands."
While Abbas is seeking to eliminate any US role in the peace process, his envoy to Moscow, Abdel Hafiz Nofal, announced earlier this week that the Americans could still be part of an effort to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In other words, the Palestinians are willing to do the Americans a "favor" by "permitting" them to participate in efforts to achieve peace in the Middle East.
It seems as if President Trump's threat to cut funding unless the Palestinians came to the peace table, had some effect.
Even veteran Palestinian affairs experts admit that Abbas has managed to confuse everyone with his contradictory statements.
Abbas mouths the word "peace," yet his Ministry of Information in Ramallah was the first to condemn a visit by Arab journalists to Israel.
The nine journalists from Morocco, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and Yemen were invited by the Israeli Foreign Ministry. But Abbas's ministry denounced the visit and called for blacklisting and punishing the Arab journalists for promoting "normalization" with Israel.
How, exactly, do these condemnations conform with Abbas's other claims that he seeks to resume peace talks with Israel?
The mask on Abbas's face has fallen once again. That mask has, in fact, been falling for many years. Perhaps one day the world will even see that.
**Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East.
© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Macron Vows to Reform Islam in France/"It is time to bring in a new generation."

Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/February 14/18
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11893/france-islam-reform
The overall objective of President Macron's plan is to ensure that French law takes precedence over Islamic law for Muslims living in the country.
The plan, as currently conceived, is vague and short on details, but appears to involve three broad pillars: determining who will represent Muslims in France; delineating how Islam in France will be financed; and defining how imams in France will be trained.
"It is time to bring in a new generation. We have seen fifteen years of debate to defend the interests of foreign states." — Hakim el-Karoui, a French-Tunisian expert on Islam who is advising Macron on the reforms.
French President Emmanuel Macron, in a declared effort to "fight fundamentalism" and "preserve national cohesion," has promised to "lay the groundwork for the entire reorganization of Islam in France."
According to Macron, the plan, similar in ambition to Austria's Islam Law, is aimed at seeking to "better integrate" Islam in France in order to "place it in a more peaceful relationship with the state."
A key priority is to reduce outside interference by restricting foreign funding for mosques, imams and Muslim organizations in France. The plan's overall objective is to ensure that French law takes precedence over Islamic law for Muslims living in the country.
In a February 11 interview with the Journal du Dimanche, Macron said that the plan, which is being coordinated by the Interior Ministry, will be announced within the next six months: "We are working on the structuring of Islam in France and also on how to explain it," Macron said. "My goal is to rediscover what lies at the heart of secularism—the possibility of being able to believe as well as not to believe—in order to preserve national cohesion and the possibility of having free religious conscience."
Macron also said that he was consulting a broad array of experts and religious leaders for their input into the reform plan: "I see intellectuals and academics, such as [French Islam expert] Gilles Kepel, and representatives of all religions, because I think we need to draw heavily on our history, the history of Catholics and Protestants." He added:
"I will never ask any French citizen to be moderate in his religion or to believe moderately in his God. That would not make much sense. But I will ask everyone, constantly, to absolutely respect all the rules of the Republic."
Macron's plan, as currently conceived, is vague and short on details, but appears to involve three broad pillars: determining who will represent Muslims in France; delineating how Islam in France will be financed; and defining how imams in France will be trained.
Representation of Muslims in France
A key aspect of Macron's plan is to reform the French Council of the Muslim Faith (Conseil français du culte musulman, CFCM), the official interlocutor between Muslims and the state in the regulation of Islam in France. The organization, which represents approximately 2,500 mosques in France, was established in 2003 by then Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy.
The CFCM has long faced criticism for being ineffective and contentious, largely because the rotating presidency has allowed interference by foreign countries—mainly Algeria, Morocco and Turkey—seemingly to prevent Muslims from integrating into French society. Macron said the objective was to end what he called "consular Islam" and to open the CFCM to "the most integrated" Muslims.
"It is time to bring in a new generation," said Hakim el-Karoui, a French-Tunisian expert on Islam who is advising Macron on the reforms. "We have seen fifteen years of debate to defend the interests of foreign states."
The Interior Ministry intends to have its reforms in place by 2019, when the CFCM will hold elections to renew its leadership. "The moment is propitious for advancing the necessary reforms," said Anouar Kbibech, former president of the CFCM.
Macron's plan also reportedly involves establishing a "Grand Imam of France," modeled on the position of Chief Rabbi. The individual would have the "moral authority" to represent Islam in front of the state. It remains unclear how such an individual would reconcile the competing strains of Islam to be able to represent them all.
Financing Islam in France
Macron's second priority is to "reduce the influence of Arab countries," which, he argues, "prevent French Islam from returning to modernity." His plan would restrict foreign governments or entities from funding Muslim places of worship and training imams in France. Hundreds of French mosques are being financed by countries in the North African Maghreb and Persian Gulf.
The new plan would also attempt to illuminate the financial dealings of mosques by bringing them under the jurisdiction of a French law that regulates cultural associations. French mosques currently adhere to a law that regulates non-profit associations, which allows for more opaque bookkeeping.
Macron raised the possibility of revising the 1905 "Law on the Separation of the Churches and State," which established state secularism in France. The 1905 law, among other provisions, banned government funding of religious groups in France. Addressing the prospect that French taxpayers might soon be asked to pay for Muslims to worship in France, Macron said: "The 1905 law is part of a treasure that is ours, but it did not consider the religious fact of Islam because it was not present in our society, as it is today."
Macron's plan reportedly also envisages establishing a so-called Halal Tax, a sales tax on halal products to finance Islam in France. The proposal faces fierce resistance from French Muslims, 70% of whom are opposed to establishing the tax, according to an Ifop poll for JDD.
Training Imams in France
Several hundred imams in France are civil servants whose salaries are paid by foreign governments. Interior Minister Gérard Collomb said the French government "should intervene" in the training of imams so that they are "imams of the French Republic," not "imams of foreign countries."
In an interview with Radio France Inter, Collomb said: "We can see that today we have a number of difficulties simply because nowadays everyone can proclaim himself to be an imam."
Macron's plan has been received with a mix of optimism, skepticism and derision.
Ghaleb Bencheikh, a French-Algerian Islamic reformist and a former president of the Great Mosque of Paris, said that Macron's approach was "legitimate" and "interesting." In an interview with Radio France, Bencheikh said:
"There is a terrible paradox that you have to know how to break. We are in a secular state and this sacrosanct principle of secularism stipulates that political authority should not interfere in the structure of a cult, whatever it may be. At the same time, there must be structure and privileged interlocutors of political power. The Muslim leaders are cautious, pusillanimous, they have not managed this structure. As a result, it is legitimate for both the President of the Republic and Interior Minister Gérard Collomb to insist on a healthy structure."
Le Figaro noted with skepticism that previous French presidents have made similar pledges which ended in failure:
"Will Emmanuel Macron succeed where his predecessors have failed? The urgency, in any event, is very real. Last December, a Muslim leader from Bouches-du-Rhône declared: 'The Salafists have taken control of the ground in France. There is a void, notably with the problem of imams who do not speak French.'"
In an interview with Les Echos, National Front Leader Marine Le Pen said she was worried about a possible challenge to the law separating churches and state: "There are a whole series of tracks, some of which are unbearable, unacceptable: for example, the idea of ​​a Concordat, the idea of ​​touching the law of 1905."
She called for France to take hard line on foreign financing of Islam: "I suggest stopping foreign financing of mosques and closing Salafist mosques. Any foreign imam who makes a speech contrary to the values ​​of the Republic must be expelled."
Florian Philippot, former vice president of the National Front and a Member of the European Parliament, said that Macron's plan was not aimed at returning to a "secular Republic" but to "protect Muslims."
In early January, during a meeting at the Elysée Palace with representatives of the six main religions in France (Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Muslim, Jewish and Buddhist), Macron announced that he would deliver a "major" but "dispassionate" speech on secularism during his presidency: "My wish for 2018 is that France become, with you, a model of secularism, knowing how to listen to the country's voices in their diversity, capable of building on this diversity a great nation reconciled and open to the future."
Less than a week later, however, Macron abruptly backtracked. The speech apparently was "removed from the agenda" because talking about secularism "in the context only of Islam" would be a "fatal mistake."
Columnist Hélène Jouan accused Macron of trying to play both sides against the middle:
"Emmanuel Macron is credited with holding a subtle balance between unfailing attachment to Republican principles, and absolute firmness vis-à-vis radical Islam.
"The president prefers to evade. I'm not sure that this will last. A tragic event in France would push him, of course, to reveal himself, at the risk, then, of alienating those who would judge, from the right or left, that he does too much or not enough, to lose his position of 'centrality' which he thinks he holds on the question. In the meantime, however, he buys time."
**Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute.
© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

The clash of American and Israeli priorities on Iran
Raghida Dergham/February 14, 2018/
Russia has a special opportunity to lead efforts for de-escalation and awareness-raising among the regional parties clashing in Syria, which would help move relations with the United States away from tension towards accord. But this will require Vladimir Putin to act like a true statesman, rather than a maneuverer-in-chief. Indeed, the nature of Russia’s relations with Iran, Israel, and Turkey means Moscow wields influence that is not available to the US. The US is an organic alliance with Israel, has a volatile relationship with Turkey, and is in a state of animus with Iran; while Russia is in an alliance with Iran in Syria, and fraternizes with Israel and Turkey as needed. Nothing indicates that Iran and Israel have decided to go into a direct confrontation or cross any red lines, although the risk of inadvertently going to war always stands. There is a lot to indicate the US continues to accommodate Russian interests in Syria, while having strong reservations regarding Iran’s footholds in Syria, and wants to rein in Iran’s Persian Crescent project from Tehran to Beirut via Syria and Hezbollah. It is unlikely that the Kremlin would decide to disengage from Iran, the ally on the ground who has helped protect Russian interests in Syria and the contingency partner in threatening US interests. However, Russia’s diplomacy could alert Iran to the dangers of assuming that the Trump administration is a paper tiger, or that it would back down in the face of Iranian assertiveness. Some in Tehran are wagering on implicit understandings with Israel to dampen down the thrust of the Trump administration and contain its enthusiasm to overturn a strategic American decision that had once backed an Iranian-Israeli truce under George W. Bush and Barack Obama. In some Gulf and Western capitals, some observers say the new US strategic decision is to move away from backing such a truce, and the events of the past few days, which saw the downing of an Israeli fighter jet using a Russian-made Syrian missile, and Israeli airstrikes on Iranian positions in Syria, deserve a realistic assessment both in terms of the status quo and the possible scenarios.
Russia, according to Russian experts, is considering a new initiative that would include forcing painful concessions by both Iran and Israel, to avoid a confrontation between them in Syria or Lebanon. Israel does not assign great importance to Iran’s priority in Syria, namely, to keep Assad and his regime in power to safeguard Tehran’s interests. Practically speaking, Israel does not mind the survival of Assad and his regime, because he poses no threat to Tel Aviv.
Israel does not mind Iran’s presence in Syria either, as this suits its long term goals. Indeed, in the past, the neocons in the Bush era used to promote the expansion of a Shia Crescent from Iran to Israel’s borders, considering the two powers ‘natural partners’ against Sunni extremism. Bush’s war in Iraq gave Iran a precious strategic gift, eliminating Saddam Hussein, Iran’s arch-nemesis, while Bush’s war in Afghanistan eliminated the Taliban, another foe of Iran. Israel was in full agreement with the American plan, which gave Tehran regional ascendancy, and did not seriously object to Obama’s passionate engagement with Iran that culminated with the nuclear deal with Tehran.
After the war of 2006 in Lebanon, an agreement was reached on UN Security Council resolution 1701, which governs the permanent truce between Hezbollah and Israel, including pacifying Hezbollah’s rocket arsenal from being used against Israel. Israel remained silent vis-à-vis Iran and Hezbollah’s intervention in Syria, and reached accords with Russia regarding the boundaries and geography of the battles fought by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and Hezbollah in Syria, obtaining guarantees especially concerning the Golan Heights it occupies.
In other words, Israel was reassured that the Iranian expansion in Syria was not aimed against it. For its part, Iran was reassured that Israel would not obstruct its actions in Syria, and would commit to a truce with Hezbollah in Lebanon.
The shift is taking place as a result of the strategic new decision made by the Trump administration towards Iran, which seeks to shuffle the deck of alliances and priorities in the Gulf region and the Middle East.
The leading men of the Trump administration all come from the military establishment, which thinks in terms of near- and long-term US national, economic, and strategic interests. And while Israel is very important for any US administration and has become a domestic American political issue, this does not mean that the US is fully bound to Israel’s priorities. Thus, the Trump administration has judged that US interests are served by containing Iran’s regional ambitions including by curbing its incursions in Iraq, Yemen, and Syria, as well as Hezbollah’s regional and international activities.
This is the point where US and Israeli priorities could clash. One of the most important questions being raised here is whether Israel is willing to break off from the US strategic decision on Iran and its proxies, or whether it judges its own interests are better served by a deal that contains Iran’s missiles but averts a direct confrontation with Iran.
The friction between Israel and Iran in Syria have remained under control. Both sides have realized they do not want to clash with a foe who can inflict serious harm. They tested each other either to learn more about the extent of their mutual response or to dispel any impressions they are partners in the equation in Syria. But what if the US is firmly resolved to end Iran’s presence in Syria? What if Israel has concluded following the recent skirmishes that the threat from Iran’s bases in Syria is real, and that there can be no coexistence with Iranian missiles in Syria or Lebanon?
Likewise, what if Iran has concluded that Russia will protect its back in Syria no matter what happens, and will therefore continue to support Hezbollah’s bid to store rockets and heavy weaponry in Lebanon, while developing its own missiles?
These are serious questions that all sides must take the time to answer, especially Russia, the enabler of Iran’s over-confident behavior in Syria. Russia’s interests require for Iran not to behave haughtily or heavy-handedly in Syria, if for anything then to avoid prompting Washington to take military action, possibly together with Israel even if against its will or through the international coalition.
Moscow can be firm with its Iranian ally, Turkish partner, and Israeli friend and reap the rewards though an improved relationship with the US. The first test of any such bid would be a Russian decision on Iran’s ambitions in Syria and the region, because this is the litmus test for the bilateral relationship with America. The most important deterrence for all sides, to avoid falling into runaway wars, is ultimately to acknowledge the impossibility of victory.