Detailed
Lebanese & Lebanese Related LCCC English New Bulletin For August 30/2018
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias
Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias18/english.august30.18.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible
Quotations
The
harvest is plentiful, but the labourers are few; therefore ask the Lord of
the harvest to send out labourers into his harvest
Matthew 09/36-38: "When he saw the crowds, he
had compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep
without a shepherd. Then he said to his disciples, ‘The harvest is
plentiful, but the labourers are few; therefore ask the Lord of the harvest
to send out labourers into his harvest""
نشرات اخبار عربية وانكليزية مطولة ومفصلة يومية على موقعنا الألكتروني على
الرابط التالي
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/
Daily Lebanese/Arabic - English news bulletins on our LCCC web site.Click on
the link below
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/
Titles For The Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from
miscellaneous sources published on August 29-30/18
In Lebanon,
Russia Uses Softer Touch to Win Influence/Beirut/Asharq Al Awsat/August,
29/18
Analysis: Electricity in Lebanon, understanding the real problem/Reem Khamis/Annahar/August
29/18
NATO Confirms Russian Naval Buildup Off Syria, Calls for Restraint/Haaretz/August
29/18/
Iran, Russia Prepare to Battle Each Other Over Control of Post-war
Syria/Amos Harel and Amir Tibon/Haaretz/August 29/18
Iran at the Hague: Remembering America as a ‘Best Friend’/Amir Taheri/Asharq
Al Awsat/August 29/18
Facebook Is Making the US a Political Dystopia/Leonid Bershidsky/Bloomberg/August
29/18
Should It Be Illegal for Prosecutors to "Flip" Witnesses?/by Alan M.
Dershowitz/Gatestone Institute/August 29/18
William Kilpatrick: “Islam’s Thousand Year War on Christendom”/Raymond
Ibrahim/August 29/18
Ahmadinejad’s preoccupation with Serena Williams outfit/Mashari Althaydi/Al
Arabiya/August 29/18
McCain’s glory and his fatal mistake/Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/August
29/18
China’s geo-economic interests and Middle East energy industry/Sabena
Siddiqui/Al Arabiya/August 29/18
When the Brotherhood’s ‘bankrupt’ speaks!/Jameel al-Thiyabi/Al Arabiya/August
29/18
Titles For The
Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on
August 29-30/18
Aoun Refuses to Bow to Jumblat's 'Moodiness', Geagea's 'Conditions'
President Aoun, Maronite Patriarch Confer over Government Formation
Samy Gemayel Salutes Kataeb Founder on Commemoration Day
Berri to Convoke Parliament if No Government Is Formed Soon
Hariri Threatens to Expose Obstructors of Government Formation
New Government May be Delayed to Early 2019
Othman Slams 'Inaccuracy' after Reports Say Top Officer 'Facilitating
Prostitution'
MPs Loyal to Aoun, Hariri Trade Jabs over Government
Al-Sayyed to Hariri: Formation of Govts. Needs Statesmen
Mustaqbal Slams Parties Blaming Hariri for Delay, 'Sabotaging' His Ties with
Aoun
Syrian Ambassador to Lebanon: Normalization Exists
In Lebanon, Russia Uses Softer Touch to Win Influence
Statement by Minister of Foreign Affairs on International Day Against
Nuclear Tests
Le Drian confirms support for government and reforms in Lebanon
Rally in front of Beirut Municipality, Parliament demands establishment of
sanitary landfills
Aoun, French Senators tackle environmental initiative for Tripoli
Egypt says 20 militants killed in Sinai, western desert
Hariri discusses ecological project for Tripoli with French senators
Analysis: Electricity in Lebanon, understanding the real problem
Titles For The Latest LCCC
Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on August 29-30/18
Israel Renews Threat to Attack Iran Targets in Syria
Israel Says Won’t Allow Iran to Establish Itself Militarily in Syria
NATO Confirms Russian Naval Buildup Off Syria, Calls for Restraint
Thousands of Syrians Start Returning to Daraya
US Warns Assad against Chemical Attacks, UK Says Russia’s Accusations Are
‘Outlandish’
Russia’s Lavrov, Saudi FM Jubeir pledge counter-terrorism efforts
After Stinging Defeats, ISIS Revamps to Survive
Egypt Sentences to Death Six for Assassinating Policeman, Attempting to Kill
Others
Iraq: 17,000 People Sick from Contaminated Water
11 Killed in Western Iraq Suicide Car Bombing
Iran Foreign Minister in Surprise Erdogan Talks
Khamenei Says Ready to Abandon Nuclear Deal if Needed
War of Words between Hamas, Fatah on Truce with Israel
Brazil Deploys Military to Boost Security at Venezuela Border
The Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on August 29-30/18
Aoun Refuses to Bow to
Jumblat's 'Moodiness', Geagea's 'Conditions'
Naharnet/August
29/18/President Michel Aoun is refusing to bow to Progressive Socialist
Party chief Walid Jumblat's “moodiness” or to Lebanese Forces leader Samir
Geagea's “conditions,” despite his enthusiasm to see the new government
formed soon, media reports said. “Aoun is among those most keen on the
formation of the government, but strictly according to the results of the
parliamentary elections without any deviation,” al-Joumhouria newspaper
quoted “credible” sources as saying in remarks published Wednesday. The
sources stressed that, “most importantly, he will not bow to any conditions,
especially the LF's conditions and PSP chief Walid Jumblat's demand on
monopolizing Druze representation.”“The president refuses that the
government be under the mercy of Jumblat's moodiness should he gain the
ability to threaten its existence” by stripping it of binding Druze
representation, the sources added.
President Aoun, Maronite Patriarch Confer over Government Formation
Kataeb.org/ Wednesday 29th August 2018/maronite patriarch
bechara al-rahi
Maronite Patriarch Bechara al-Rahi on Wednesday said that President Michel
Aoun is optimistic regarding the formation of a new government, saying that
Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri will be visiting Aoun within the few
coming days so as to submit to him a draft line-up. Following his meeting
with Aoun at the Baabda Palace, Al-Rahi stressed that it is the right of
Syrian and Iraqi refugees to return to their homelands, adding that this
should not be linked to a political solutions in their countries.
Samy Gemayel Salutes Kataeb Founder on Commemoration
Day
Kataeb.org/Wednesday 29th August 2018/Kataeb leader Samy
Gemayel on Wednesday invoked the memory of the party founder Pierre Gemayel
on the 34th anniversary of his passing, praising him as an example of
bravery. “Pierre Gemayel, you will remain a model of courageous and
impartial nationalism,” Gemayel tweeted. MP Elias Hankache also hailed
Gemayel on his commemoration day, saying that he laid the foundations of a
cause that will never die. Pierre Gemayel was born in November 1905 in
Bickfaya, into a Maronite family. His father Amine Bachir Gemayel and his
uncle were forced to flee to Egypt after being sentenced to death in 1915
for opposing Ottoman rule, returning to Lebanon only at the end of World War
I.Gemayel studied pharmacy at the French faculty of medicine in Beirut,
where he later opened a pharmacy. He also had an interest in sport, and
attended the 1936 Olympic games in Berlin. After the games, he also visited
various Central European countries. Upon his return to Lebanon later that
year, Gemayel founded the Kataeb Party which survived a French attempt to
forcibly dissolve it in 1937 and took part in an uprising against the French
Mandate in 1943. It was not until the events of 1958 that Gemayel emerged as
a leader of the far right movement that opposed a Nasserist and
Arab-nationalist inspired attempt to overthrow the government of President
Kamil Chamoun. Gemayel was appointed a cabinet minister in a four-member
Unity government. Two years later, Gemayel was elected lawmaker. In 1958,
Gemayel was appointed deputy to then Prime Minister Rachid Karami. He was
appointed as minister of public works in 1970 and took part in another
government line-up in 1984. In the 1970s, he staunchly opposed the armed
Palestinian presence in Lebanon. In 1976, he joined other prominent
Christian leaders to oppose the Syrian scheme to occupy Lebanon. Gemayel was
still in office when he died of a heart attack in Bickfaya on August 29,
1984. He was at the age of 78.
Berri to Convoke Parliament if No Government Is Formed
Soon
Kataeb.org/ Wednesday 29th August 2018/Speaker Nabih Berri on Wednesday
renewed his call for the swift formation of the government, saying that he
will opt for "urgency legislation" if no Cabinet takes charge soon. “The
economic situation has become unbearable and laws must be ratified to
address urgent files,” Berri was quoted as saying during his weekly meeting
with lawmakers. “I will call for a Parliament session as soon as committees
finish discussing certain draft laws, notably those pertaining to pressing
financial issues,” he added.
Hariri Threatens to Expose Obstructors of Government
Formation
Kataeb.org/ Wednesday 29th August 2018/Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri
on Tuesday threatened to expose those who are obstructing his mission to
form a new government, rejecting individual and unfounded interpretations of
the Constitution regarding the period of the government formation process.
"If the government is not formed soon, I will name those hindering the
process," he told reporters at his Downtown Beirut residence. "Let no one
set any deadlines for me. Constitutional lectures made by this or that
minister do not concern me." Hariri said that he had contacted President
Michel Aoun and agreed to meet with him soon, adding that he will resume
talks with political forces within the next few days. The PM-designate also
commented on the latest speech delivered by Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah,
saying that the group's position regarding the Special Tribunal for Lenanon
has not changed. Hariri accused the Syrian regime of blackmailing Lebanon by
conditioning the normalization of ties in order to reopen the Nassib border
crossing.
New Government May be Delayed to Early 2019
Naharnet/August 29/18/The Cabinet formation process has witnessed no
positive developments and the current complications are threatening to delay
the creation of the new government until early 2019, media reports said.
“New hurdles are surfacing everyday and the parties concerned are not
announcing their true stances,” al-Joumhouria newspaper reported Wednesday.
“Any of the parties has not shown willingness to offer concessions regarding
its demands, which more and more confirms that largely domestic reasons are
behind the delay,” the daily added. On Tuesday, Prime Minister-designate
Saad Hariri had warned that he would “name the obstructors” if the
government was not formed soon. All parties are still clinging to their
demands, with the Progressive Socialist Party insisting on three Druze seats
and the Lebanese Forces asking for a significant share that reflects the
gains it made in the latest parliamentary elections. And after the weekly
meeting of the Strong Lebanon bloc on Tuesday, Free Patriotic Movement chief
MP Jebran Bassil emphasized that the president should have a share in the
government in order to put the “strong president” idea into action.
Othman Slams 'Inaccuracy' after Reports Say Top Officer 'Facilitating
Prostitution'
Naharnet/August 29/18/Internal Security Forces chief Maj. Gen. Imad Othman
lamented Wednesday what he called “inaccuracy,” after media reports said the
head of the ISF's Bureau for Combating Morality Crimes had been detained on
charges of “involvement in running prostitution rings.”“What is being
circulated lacks the least requirements of accuracy and can be labeled as
repugnant defamation,” Othman said in a statement. “The Directorate General
of the ISF is the only side entitled to announce the results of its
investigations and it rejects all the circulated reports and fabrications,”
the ISF chief added. The aforementioned bureau's chief, Colonel Johnny
Haddad, was “summoned to interrogation Monday evening and subsequently
detained in connection with financial ties to the owner of a touristic
project in the Choueifat area suspected of being used for illegal
prostitution,” media reports said on Wednesday. “Five policemen were
summoned to interrogation on Tuesday morning and three of them were detained
as the two others were freed,” the reports added.
MPs Loyal to Aoun, Hariri Trade Jabs over Government
Naharnet/August 29/18/Lawmakers from the blocs of President
Michel Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri on Wednesday exchanged
tirades over the delay in the Cabinet formation process. “Dear PM-designate,
it is true that the Constitution does not stipulate a deadline, but what's
more correct is that it is not written due to the simple fact that it is
linked to the regularity of the state's functions,” Strong Lebanon bloc MP
Ziad Aswad tweeted, adding that the current government should not continue
acting in caretaker capacity indefinitely. “The deadline of commitment, the
ethics of governmental work and keenness on the work of state institutions
is shorter than any written deadline,” the MP added. Al-Mustaqbal bloc MP
Mohammed al-Hajjar was quick to snap back on Twitter. “Dear colleague Ziad
Aswad... Your tweet to the PM-designate is 'Jreissati-like' par excellence,”
Hajjar tweeted, referring to caretaker Justice Minister Salim Jreissati.
“But the ethics of political action require facilitating the formation
process, not obstructing it. You can ask your president,” the MP added. Aoun
and Hariri themselves have traded veiled jabs in recent days. On Monday, the
president noted that Hariri “is the one who will form this government,
whereas the president's jurisdiction is to approve and sign.”“That's why the
PM-designate must take the initiative and begin forming the government,”
Aoun added. Hariri hit back on Tuesday, saying “the issue of the
government's formation is everyone's responsibility” and warning that he
could soon name those who are “obstructing” the formation process.
Al-Sayyed to Hariri: Formation of Govts. Needs Statesmen
Naharnet/August 29/18/MP Jamil al-Sayyed lashed out Wednesday at Prime
Minister-designate Saad Hariri, noting that he is “not a statesman.”“More
than two weeks ago, I said that foreign forces were forbidding Hariri from
forming the government, and I mentioned in the tweet that I would apologize
to Hariri should he form the government within two weeks! The time has
passed and he has not dared to form it,” al-Sayyed tweeted. “The formation
of governments needs statesmen driven exclusively by the interests of the
country and its people. This man is nonexistent,” the lawmaker, who is close
to Damascus and Hizbullah, added.
Mustaqbal Slams Parties Blaming Hariri for Delay,
'Sabotaging' His Ties with Aoun
Naharnet/August 29/18/Al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc on Tuesday blasted
political parties blaming Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri for the delay
in the government formation process, as it warned that some are seeking to
“sabotage” his ties with President Michel Aoun. “Some stances and legal
recommendations have suggested that the PM-designate will step down from the
mission of forming the government or that parliament should be tasked with
taking a decision in this regard. The bloc warns that there are non-innocent
calls that violate the Constitution's stipulations, the spirit of the Taef
Accord and the requirements of national accord,” said the bloc in a
statement issued after its weekly meeting. Mustaqbal also criticized parties
“insisting on blaming the PM-designate for the government delay,” accusing
them of “reversing the facts and ignoring the real reasons behind the
crisis.”And warning that “there is a growing rhetoric that contradicts with
the settlement that restored the role of state institutions and put an end
to a presidential void that lasted for more than two years,” the bloc
underlined that “cooperation between President Michel Aoun and PM-designate
Saad Hariri was not a political stroll that ends with the completion of a
certain event.”“It has been and will always be the basis in the project of
protecting the country,” the bloc added. Accordingly, it urged an end to
perceived attempts at “sabotaging the ties” between Aoun and Hariri and
stressed the importance of “immunizing the political settlement and all the
breakthroughs it created.”
Syrian Ambassador to
Lebanon: Normalization Exists
Beirut - Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 29 August, 2018/Syrian Ambassador to
Lebanon Ali Abdel Karim said that the relations between Lebanon and Syria
were real “as long as I am an ambassador to Lebanon and there is also a
Lebanese ambassador to Syria.”
He continued: “Brotherly ties between the two countries necessitate a more
realistic and more tolerant rhetoric, and further respect.”Following his
meeting with Speaker Nabih Berri, the ambassador expressed his discontent
with some parties’ criticism of the relations with Syria, saying: “The
unfortunate discourse of some calls for lamentation; normalization exists,
so do the roots of one family.”Responding to the reporters’ questions, Abdel
Karim emphasized that while Syria needed Lebanon, “Lebanon needs Syria more,
and both countries are governed by a geographical relationship, history and
common families; and any words outside this context should be reconsidered
by their owner because such speech shameful.”
In Lebanon, Russia
Uses Softer Touch to Win Influence
Beirut/Asharq Al Awsat/August, 29/18
In a dimly-lit classroom in a Lebanese
mountain town, students of all ages pore over Cyrillic workbooks and repeat
carefully after their blonde instructor. "Privet. Kak dela?" -- "Hello, how
are you?"
Moscow may have won influence in war-torn Syria through its blistering
military intervention, but it is adopting a softer approach in neighboring
Lebanon, where France and the US have held stronger sway. Whether through
cultural outreach, planned business deals or traditional diplomacy, Russia
appears to be trying to put down deep roots in the tiny Mediterranean
country. In her classroom at the Russian-Lebanese Cultural Center, nestled
in the town of Aley, instructor Galina Pavlova says she hopes her native
tongue will find more fans among Lebanese, who in addition to Arabic often
speak French and English. "We don't want France and the United States to be
the only ones present in Lebanon -- Russia is a very important country too,"
she tells AFP. The Aley center is one of three new such hubs to have opened
in Lebanon this summer alone, established with the backing of Moscow's
embassy in Beirut. "This expansion falls within the framework of a strategy
aiming to strengthen Moscow's presence in the Middle East," says Imad Rizk,
who heads the Isticharia Centre for Strategic and Communication Studies.
Ties between Moscow and Beirut intensified in the 1950s with the rise of
Lebanon's left, before fading after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
"Lebanon, still strongly associated to the West, is one certainly symbolic
piece of (Russia's) broader desire to remodel the world governance," says
Julien Nocetti, a specialist in Russia's role in the Middle East. The aim,
he says, is to hasten "the coming of a post-West world order."
'Put down roots'
As new cultural centers open, Moscow is also boosting to 60 the number of
university scholarships it gives to Lebanese students this year and
deepening its economic ties to Beirut. It nearly doubled the value of its
exports to the tiny country from $423 million in 2012 to $770 million last
year, according to Lebanese customs data. The two countries are in talks
over potentially opening a "green corridor" for Lebanese agricultural
exports to Russia. And Novatek, one of Russia's largest natural gas
producers, is part of a consortium expected to begin exploring for gas off
Lebanon's coast next year. Lebanon's top diplomat Gebran Bassil traveled to
Moscow recently, encouraging more Russian companies to take part in a new
upcoming tender for further exploration. Beirut is relying on external help
to revive its struggling economy, and in April a donor conference raised $11
billion in low-interest loans and aid for the state to improve basic public
services. "We hope to make the Russians participate in the vast project to
modernize Lebanese infrastructure," says Jacques Sarraf, who heads the
Lebanese-Russian Business Council. In addition, Sarraf says, "Russian
businesses intend to put down roots in Lebanon's north ahead of Syria's
reconstruction."But the process is complicated, with both Syrian and Russian
firms facing European and American sanctions that have left Lebanese banks
"reluctant to deal with their Russian counterparts," he adds. Lebanon's
banking sector is already being carefully monitored by the US Treasury,
which is seeking to weaken the powerful Iran-backed Hezbollah movement by
targeting "suspicious" banking.
Influence through repatriation?
Lebanon's growth has slowed to a crawl in recent years as political
divisions have paralyzed the government and services have been strained by
the arrival of 1.5 million Syrian refugees. Moscow is looking to lend a
helping hand there too, launching an initiative in July to repatriate
refugees from around the region. The proposal has been welcomed by the
political class in Lebanon, which hosts some 900,000 refugees who could
return to Syria, according to President Michel Aoun, who is close to both
Damascus and Hezbollah. Moscow has also proposed a billion-dollar defense
contract to arm Lebanese troops, but Beirut pulled out at the "last minute,"
says Sarraf. Such a deal could have jeopardized the sizeable US support
Beirut receives from the US, including the $1.7 billion it has received in
military aid since 2006. Aram Nerguizian, co-director of the Carnegie Middle
East Center's department on civil-military relations, says Lebanon's ties to
the US were at stake. "If Lebanon accepts or even insinuates an intent to
accept a Russian credit line for the purchase of Russian defense articles,
it will have significant -- and potentially irreversible -- geopolitical
consequences on Lebanon's existing bilateral and multilateral commitments
and partnerships, especially ties to the US," he tells AFP.
Statement by Minister of Foreign Affairs on
International Day Against Nuclear Tests
August 29, 2018 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
The Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today issued
the following statement:
“Canada is firmly committed to the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons
and nuclear testing, which remains a significant threat to international
peace and security.
“The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty [CTBT] is an integral component
of the global non-proliferation and disarmament regime, and Canada strongly
supports efforts toward its full ratification. The entry into force of the
Treaty will provide tangible security benefits for all states, and help to
advance our collective efforts to halt the spread of nuclear weapons and
eliminate existing arsenals.
“As North Korea’s behaviour over the past several years has shown, test
explosions have harmful and destabilizing consequences that threaten global
peace and security. Canada welcomes the recent high-level inter-Korean
dialogue and ongoing engagement between the United States and North Korea.
We urge North Korea to follow up by taking concrete, verifiable action to
dismantle its weapons of mass destruction programs. The signing and
ratification of the CTBT would be an important step to demonstrate its
genuine intent to halt nuclear testing.
“Canada is an active leader in efforts to end nuclear testing, including
through our strong contributions to the CTBT, its organization, and the
International Monitoring System. Canada currently hosts 16 of the CTBT
organization’s monitoring stations and laboratories, and has contributed
valuable data following North Korea’s nuclear tests.
“We know that nuclear disarmament is possible, and we will continue to do
our part to advance collective efforts toward this goal.”
Le Drian confirms support for government and reforms in
Lebanon
Wed 29 Aug 2018/NNA - Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs of the French
Republic, Jean-Yves Le Drian, confirmed Wednesday his support for the
Lebanese government and the economic reforms contained in the
recommendations of the "CEDRE" conference.
Speaking at the Ambassadors' Conference held in Paris, the head of French
diplomacy also announced France's support for Lebanon's dissociation policy
away from regional conflicts.
Rally in front of Beirut Municipality, Parliament
demands establishment of sanitary landfills
Wed 29 Aug 2018/NNA - A number of activists gathered this Wednesday in front
of the Municipality of Beirut in protest against waste incinerators.
Attending the rally was MP Paula Yaacoubian, the NNA correspondent said. "A
sustainable solution, if implemented in the treatment of waste, will be the
final resolution to all crises, including the electricity and housing
crises," said one of the activists, calling, on behalf of all, for the
establishment of sanitary landfills. Protesters then headed to the House of
Representatives, demanding "the Environment Committee to hold the Ministry
of Environment accountable, and to have a solution found through the
Committee within the House of Representatives.”
Activists later went to the Riad Solh square, according to the same source.
Aoun, French Senators tackle environmental initiative
for Tripoli
Wed 29 Aug 2018/NNA - President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun,
informed members of the French Senate who visited him at the Baabda Palace
this Wednesday that he “pays special attention to the environment in Lebanon
and the importance of preserving it and encouraging projects that protect
biodiversity and natural resources which have become under direct threat due
to neglect, on the one hand, and lack of attention to safe and modern waste
treatment, on the other hand." He underscored the importance of education in
schools and universities "to encourage students since childhood to respect
the environment," pointing out that "the national economic plan gives the
environmental issue a key space, so as to keep pace with the process of
advancement."The president also stressed the importance of bilateral and
multilateral cooperation to protect the environment, especially the
initiative by members of the French Senate to organize a symposium in Paris
on September 10 to dwell on environmental issues, especially in the city of
Tripoli. The delegation members underlined the need to fight pollution,
pointing out that their goal is to work with the association "We Are
Tripoli" and the city's figures to render Tripoli an ecological capital par
excellence, as it is as an economic capital. On a different note, President
Aoun received a delegation of the Amal movement comprised of caretaker
Finance Minister, Ali Hassan Khalil, MP Ali Bazzi and lawyer Ali Abdullah,
who invited the Head-of-State to attend the ceremony to be held next Friday
in Baalbek on the 40th commemoration of the vanishing of Imam Moussa al-Sadr
and his companions.
Egypt says 20 militants killed in Sinai, western desert
Wed 29 Aug 2018/NNA - Egypt says its security forces have killed at least 20
suspected militants in recent days in the restive northern Sinai Peninsula
and along its porous border with Libya. The military said in a statement
Wednesday that forces destroyed 18 hideouts and weapons depots, dismantled
41 explosive devices and arrested 83 suspects. The military says airstrikes
destroyed 39 vehicles containing weapons and ammunition in the Western
Desert. Egypt launched a nationwide operation against militants in February.
It has struggled to combat a long-running insurgency in the Sinai that is
now affiliated with Daesh (ISIS) group.--Associated Press
Hariri discusses ecological project for Tripoli with
French senators
Wed 29 Aug 2018/NNA - Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri received today at
the Center House a delegation of members of the French Senate that included
senators Nathalie Goulet, Joel Guerriau and Corinne Feret, in the presence
of MP Dima Jamali, former MP Nabil de Freige and Mr. Omar Harfoush.
Discussions focused on an ecological initiative for Tripoli, and continued
over a lunch hosted by Prime Minister Hariri. After the meeting, Goulet
said: "We visited Tripoli to try to better cooperate on sustainable
development and citizen ecology. On September 10th, in Paris, there will be
a conference in the Senate on citizen ecology with Tripoli as a model. This
is unique and we wanted to see things on the ground. We had a wonderful
surprise, the Tripoli Chamber of Commerce and Industry decided to adopt the
"zero plastic bag" soon. These are very important measures. Then we will
work on food waste, which is also a real subject. Nobody likes to throw away
food and it is very important to be able to cooperate between
parliamentarians, because the parliamentary level is closer to the people
and allows the exchange of experiences. The parliamentarians of Tripoli
joined our action. This morning, we were received by President Aoun, which
was an honor for modest French parliamentarians who came to cooperate. We
had this meeting with Prime Minister Hariri, who of course also supports
this action. All good fairies are around this cradle and we will really try
to make it a model for the rest of Lebanon. We know the situation in Lebanon
and the regional situation. Today, to make Tripoli the second largest
economic city in the country, it is also necessary to reconcile ecology and
sustainable development. It is an absolute necessity and I really thank Omar
Harfouch and Dima Jamali for wanting to associate us to this project. There
will be a continuation, we are here for a while, we will make a roadmap, and
we will see you soon on the ground." For her part, Jamali said: We informed
Prime Minister Hariri about the meetings we held and the tours we conducted
in Tripoli, which were very good and resulted in a cooperation with the
Chamber of Commerce and Industry to reduce the use of plastic bags in the
city. There is also cooperation on Tripoli between the French Senate and the
Lebanese Parliament, to work on projects aimed at alleviating the
environmental crisis in the city. Prime Minister Hariri expressed his full
support for this project. Hariri also received the Ambassador of Belarus to
Syria and Lebanon Alexander Ponomarev, in the presence of the Vice-President
of the Lebanese-Belarussian Business Council Abdel-Wadoud Nsouli. The
meeting focused on the bilateral relations between the two countries.
Analysis: Electricity
in Lebanon, understanding the real problem
Reem Khamis/Annahar/August 29/18
The failure of the Lebanese government to re-organize the electricity sector
is leading to deficits on the public budget.
BEIRUT: The Energy sector in Lebanon has been facing many challenges over
the years. The outbreak of the Civil War from 1975 until 1990 caused the
electricity sector in the country to lag behind global and regional
electricity trends, due to the destruction and damage of the electricity
infrastructure, as well as the impairment of managerial, operational,
technical and financial capacities of the state-owned Electricite Du Liban (EDL).
As electricity fails, desperate Venezuelans buy spoiled meat
During this time, illegal links and connections to the electricity networks
were facilitated as well as fraud and theft, such as manipulating the
meters. Illegal connections cause great mechanical and technical damages to
the grid and cause additional maintenance and repair costs.
These practices have thus weakened the financial abilities of the
electricity supplier and the government and persisted even after the end of
the war and, unfortunately, they’re still present until today.
Following the end of the Civil War, a restoration plan was launched in order
to improve the transmission and supply networks and to expand the generating
capacity. Nevertheless, this strategy proved to be ineffective as the
electricity supply did not meet the demand.
The government was neither proactive nor innovative; instead, it followed
the same old patterns for electricity production, relying on petroleum.
Moreover, it didn’t take into account the population growth and the
continuous increase for energy demand over the years. It also didn’t take
into account the financial consequences that could rise from the increase of
fuel price. Along with that, corruption and political instabilities remained
present, hindering the energy sector from developing.
Lebanon’s electricity system was also affected by the outbreak of the Civil
War in Syria in 2011. First, the inflow of Syrian refugees to the country
amplified demand for electricity, as the country welcomed over 1.5 million
immigrants. Second, a study done by the UN and the Government in 2017 shows
that “at least 45 percent of electrical connections done by Syrian
households to the grid are done in an illegal manner.”
Technical Challenges
Technical challenges and barriers have also stood in the way of improving
the situation of the energy sector in Lebanon. A major challenge is having
to deal with technical damages and losses caused by illegal connections to
the grid, which causes a fall in the generation capacity to almost 50
percent.
Old power plants have also limited the efficiency of electricity production
in Lebanon. Most of the electricity power plants in Lebanon are between 25
to 45 years old and some are even older. The problem with aged power plants
is that they require more maintenance and lead to a decrease in capacity
output in comparison to the initial design capacity. A Lack of maintenance
and technical supervision accentuates the problem and has resulted in
limited plant efficiency.
Some plants – the Beddawi and Zahrani power plants – were constructed and
equipped with “combined cycle gas turbines,” initially planned and designed
to best function using natural gas, thus reaching greater efficiencies than
“open-cycle gas turbine.” However, due to the lack of natural gas supply,
these energy plants are running on gas oil which reduces the efficiency of
the operation and lead to a lower output than expected.
Even when the installed plants are operated in full capacity, generating
approximately 2700 MW, the supply is not enough to cover the demand at peak
time. Furthermore, due to the aging of the power plants, as well as the
technical losses in the transmission and distribution networks, the gap
grows even bigger between the demand and the supply, leaving citizens with
almost 1300-1500 MW power shortage.
Management Challenges
The failure of the Lebanese government to re-organize the electricity sector
is leading to deficits on the public budget. These losses are the results of
technical challenges as well as weak organizational and operational
administration and frameworks.
EDL is being greatly subsidized and has been increasingly costing the
country reaching 25% of its annual state budget. This has resulted in the
decrease of government expenditure on other fundamental matters such as
social security, infrastructure, education, health and other social and
economic development projects
Corruption has played a great role in weakening the electricity system,
which has caused people to lose trust in the government, and as a matter of
expediency, to rely on privately owned diesel generators.
Private electricity providers have become an integrated part of the grid,
which led President Michel Aoun to make a decision recently, requiring
generator owners to install meters. The situation highlights the problem, as
in an ideal system, private diesel generators shouldn’t be an alternative
energy resource as they pollute the environment.
Noting also, it’s a privately owned parallel network to what was supposed to
be a working state-system.
The electricity deficit should shift to renewable, rather than fuel-based
options. A new mindset is needed instead of relying on petroleum for
electricity production.
Despite high electricity rates, the awareness to rethink and reduce the
energy consumption at a household level is weak. Adding to that, the
consciousness toward the reliance and the use of renewable energy among
industries, as well as households, is still underdeveloped.
The portion of renewables in gross energy consumption is marginal compared
to the reliance on fuels; as fuel-based sources constitute a great
percentage of electricity consumption, while hydraulic sources cover a
marginal share.
The challenges in the energy sector in Lebanon expand on various scales, as
the problem starts on a country level with political instabilities,
corruption, weak and inefficient electricity production and main reliance on
fuel-based electricity.
The issue drags on regional level with technical losses during the
transmission phase. Furthermore, the problem is also at a community level,
as not all distributions are legal, and illegal connections to the grid are
still common and causing damages to the network; and lastly, unsustainable
consumption pattern is observed at a household level due to the lack of
awareness and consciousness.
The results are obvious in the daily blackouts, which are so expected at
certain times, to the point where Lebanese citizens can set their phone to
alert at certain hours of the day.
**Reem Khamis holds a masters in Environmental and Energy Management at the
University of Twente in the Netherlands. Her thesis was an emphasis on urban
resilience and climate change adaptation in megacities. Rim is currently
undergoing her PhD studies in Environmental and Energy Solutions at the
University of Pau and Pays de L'Adour in France focusing on climate change
adaptation in medium-sized European cities.
The Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News
published
on
August 29-30/18
Israel Renews Threat
to Attack Iran Targets in Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 29/18/Israel on
Wednesday renewed its threat to attack Iranian military targets in Syria,
after Tehran and Damascus signed an accord on security cooperation. "The
accord concluded by (Syrian President) Bashar al-Assad and Iran constitutes
a test for Israel: Our response will be loud and clear," Intelligence
Minister Yisrael Katz said on Israeli public radio. "We will not allow Iran
to establish itself militarily in Syria," he said. "We will react in Syria
with all our might against any Iranian target that threatens Israel, and if
the Syrian army's air defense intervenes against us, it will pay the price."
Iran's military attache to Damascus said Tuesday that his country's military
advisers would remain in Syria under the defense agreement signed the
previous day. "Support for Syria's territorial integrity and the
independence of Syrian sovereignty were also emphasized in the agreement,"
Brigadier-General Abolghasem Alinejad said. Tehran has provided steady
political, financial and military backing to Assad as he has fought back
against a seven-year uprising. Israel has sought to avoid direct involvement
in the conflict but acknowledges carrying out dozens of air strikes in Syria
to stop what it says are deliveries of advanced weaponry to Lebanon's
Hizbullah. It has also pledged to prevent its arch foe Iran from entrenching
itself militarily in Syria and a series of strikes that have killed Iranians
in Syria have been attributed to Israel.
Israel Says Won’t
Allow Iran to Establish Itself Militarily in Syria
Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 29 August, 2018/Israel renewed on Wednesday its
threat to attack Iranian military targets in Syria, after the two allies
signed an accord on security cooperation. The "defense and technical
agreement" provides for the continued "presence and participation" of Iran
in Syria, according to Iran's Defense Minister Amir Hatami, who has visited
Damascus. But Israeli Intelligence Minister Yisrael Katz said on public
radio that “the accord concluded by (the head of the Syrian regime) Bashar
Assad and Iran constitutes a test for Israel: Our response will be loud and
clear." "We will not allow Iran to establish itself militarily in Syria," he
warned. "We will react in Syria with all our might against any Iranian
target that threatens Israel, and if the Syrian army's air defense
intervenes against us, it will pay the price." Like Hatami, Iran's military
attache to Damascus said Tuesday that his country's military advisers would
remain in Syria under the defense agreement signed the previous day.
"Support for Syria's territorial integrity and the independence of Syrian
sovereignty were also emphasized in the agreement," Brig.-Gen. Abolghasem
Alinejad said. Tehran has provided steady political, financial and military
backing to Assad.
NATO Confirms Russian
Naval Buildup Off Syria, Calls for Restraint
Haaretz/August 29/18/
'It is important that all actors in the region exercise restraint and
refrain from worsening an already disastrous humanitarian situation in
Syria,' a NATO spokesman told Haaretz in a statement.
NATO confirmed a large scale Russian navy buildup in the Mediterranean Sea
off Syria on Tuesday. “The Russian Navy has dispatched substantial naval
forces to the Mediterranean, including several ships equipped with modern
cruise missiles,” NATO spokesperson Oana Lungescu confirmed to Haaretz in a
statement.Russian media on Tuesday called the deployment Moscow's largest
naval buildup since it entered the Syrian conflict in 2015. The
reinforcement comes as Russia's ally, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, is
believed to be considering an assault on the last big rebel-held enclave,
Idlib in the north. Lungescu said, “Many NATO Allies border the
Mediterranean, and our navies constantly operate there, so we monitor naval
activity in the region, including that of Russia.”“We will not speculate on
the intention of the Russian fleet, but it is important that all actors in
the region exercise restraint and refrain from worsening an already
disastrous humanitarian situation in Syria,” added the spokesperson. “NATO
is not present in Syria, but we support the efforts of the United Nations to
achieve a lasting political resolution to the conflict.”Russia claimed on
Monday that the U.S. is preparing for a possible strike on Syria.
Major-General Igor Konashenkov was quoted by agencies as saying that the USS
Ross, a guided-missile destroyer, had entered the Mediterranean on Aug. 25
armed with 28 Tomahawk cruise missiles capable of hitting any target in
Syria
Russian intervention
Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said on Tuesday that the Russian
military was in talks with leaders of armed groups in Syria's rebel-held
Idlibprovince to reach a peace settlement, Russian news agency RIA reported.
Shoigu said the aim of the Idlib talks was to reach peaceful resolution
similar to the settlements in Syria's Eastern Ghouta and Deraa, RIA said.
The Russian Navy has dispatched the biggest task force to the Mediterranean
Sea since the start of Russia's intervention in the Syrian conflict in
September 2015, Russian daily Izvestia reported.
* The task force includes 13 warships and two submarines
* Most of the ships carry 'Kalibr' cruise missiles
* Several more ships are reportedly on their way to join the task force
* Izvestia cites military experts as saying the fleet will be able to
support the Syrian army's campaign in rebel-held Idlib Province
* Russia intervened in the Syrian Civil War in 2015 backing the government
of President Bashar al-Assad
Thousands of Syrians
Start Returning to Daraya
Asharq Al Awsat/Wednesday, 29 August, 2018/Thousands of Syrians began
returning to Daraya on Tuesday, state media said, for the first time since
government forces clawed back the Damascus suburb from rebels two years ago.
The town was one of the major centers of the uprising against President
Bashar al-Assad and suffered massive damage during the fighting, forcing
most of its people to leave. Assad’s military and its allies regained
control of Daraya after years of bitter siege and bombing. Many who did not
want to live under state rule left along with rebel fighters under a
surrender deal in August 2016. Civilians and fighters who feared state rule
were bussed out to insurgent territory in the north, while others - who most
likely are those now returning to the town - were displaced to government
territory around the capital. Displaced people were returning after Daraya
was “purged of remnants of the terrorists and the main services were
reinstated”, state TV said. State news agency SANA showed pictures of crowds
gathering under large government flags and photos of Assad. Behind them,
rows of buildings, their windows blown out, appeared pitted with shellholes
and showed heavy damage from fighting. Russia's defense minister said on
Tuesday that war-torn Syria would be ready to accept one million returning
refugees, following Moscow-backed reconstruction work. "Since 2015, when
towns and villages gradually started to be freed, more than one million
people have returned home," Sergei Shoigu said in comments reported by
Russian news agencies. "Now every opportunity has been created for the
return of roughly one million (more) refugees," he told journalists. "Huge
infrastructure reconstruction work is ongoing, the rebuilding of transport
routes and security points so that Syria can begin accepting
refugees."Russia, a long-time ally of Syria, launched a military
intervention in 2015 to support the Bashar al-Assad's regime, a move that
changed the course of the war. Assad and his allies have since recovered
swathes of territory and the government is turning its attention to
post-conflict reconstruction, with the aid of Moscow. The war that erupted
in 2011, one of the most devastating conflicts since World War II, has
displaced more than half of Syria's population, including more than five
million beyond its borders. Most of them fled to neighboring countries,
particularly Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. Presidents Vladimir Putin and
Donald Trump discussed the return of refugees at a summit in Helsinki last
month. Moscow later said it had put forward plans to Washington to cooperate
on their return to Syria but details have yet to be confirmed.
US Warns Assad against
Chemical Attacks, UK Says Russia’s Accusations Are ‘Outlandish’
New York - Ali Barada/Asharq Al Awsat/Wednesday, 29 August, 2018/The United
States has warned that it would respond appropriately to any chemical
weapons attack by the regime of Bashar Assad, as members of the United
Nations Security Council exchanged counter accusations on the deteriorating
humanitarian situation in Syria and the threat to the lives of millions of
civilians in Idlib province. US Representative to the UN Economic and Social
Council Kelley Currie expressed concern to the Council that the Assad regime
could once again use chemical weapons against its people, warning that “the
United States, France and the United Kingdom are committed to responding
appropriately to any such attacks.”The use of chemical weapons against
civilian populations as part of the assault on Idlib would have “devastating
consequences for humanitarian conditions on the ground” and would further
erode the international regime prohibiting the use of chemical weapons,
Currie said. She spoke after John Ging, Director of Operations and Advocacy
for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, told the
Council that recent weeks have seen a further serious deterioration of the
humanitarian situation in northwest Syria. Noting that aid partners are
finalizing a comprehensive readiness plan for the northwest, he nevertheless
said some 2.1 million people remain in need in areas under the control of
armed groups. Emergency Relief Coordinator Mark Lowcock is in Damascus “to
engage with the government on how best to scale up the collective
humanitarian response,” he said. But Russia's envoy, Ambassador Vassily
Nebenzia, said the US has illegally created an airbase in southern Syria
close to a refugee camp. “To make a show of being humane to an audience is
not necessary,” he insisted. “What is necessary is concrete assistance.” "We
need to decouple moderate groups from terrorist groups" in Idlib, he said.
He again accused Hayat Tahrir al-Sham of preparing a chemical attack, which
Moscow says the West will use to justify a strike against Syrian forces.
Russia also claims British special forces are helping the militants,
including by possibly supplying chlorine, allegations vehemently denied by
Britain's Ambassador Karen Pierce who called them "baseless" and
"outlandish." The heated exchange of accusations came after the Security
Council held closed-door talks in which the Russian ambassador made further
accusations on the possibility of the Syrian opposition’s use of chemical
weapons. But a diplomat who attended the session said Nebenzia provided no
evidence.
Russia’s Lavrov, Saudi
FM Jubeir pledge counter-terrorism efforts
Staff writer, Al Arabiya/EnglishWednesday, 29 August 2018/Russian Foreign
Minister Sergei Lavrov announced on Wednesday, during a meeting with his
Saudi counterpart Adel al-Jubeir, a koint projects between the two countries
worth $2 bln. Both diplomats held a press conference after their meetings
where Jubeir said that Saudi Arabia “seeks to strengthen trade relations
with Russia and coordinate with them politically”. “We consult with Russia
on the situation in Yemen and the efforts made by the UN envoy to Yemen,”
Jubeir told reporters. “We also discussed the Syria situation with the
Russian side and the need to implement UN Resolutions. Lavrov also confirmed
that Russia is coordinating with Riyadh regarding a potential visit by
President Vladimir Putin to Saudi Arabia soon.
After Stinging
Defeats, ISIS Revamps to Survive
Asharq Al Awsat/Wednesday, 29 August, 2018/Four years after announcing its
cross-border "caliphate" in Iraq and Syria, a stinging string of defeats has
pushed the ISIS terrorist group to reorganize and change strategy to
survive. Having lost all urban centers under its control in Iraq and pinned
down to its last desert holdouts in Syria, ISIS has changed its
administrative structure and shifted its focus away from operating the
state-like apparatus it once ran. ISIS will have to find "a new way of doing
things, especially to recruit after heavy losses", an Iraqi security
official, who asked to remain anonymous, told AFP. At its peak, the
self-proclaimed caliphate included 35 "wilaya" (provinces) mostly set within
a swathe of territory spanning either side of the border between Syria and
Iraq. But following major military defeats -- including the militants' loss
of their de facto capitals of Raqqa in Syria and Mosul in Iraq -- ISIS
propaganda outlets now only mention six "wilaya". Former ISIS provinces like
Mosul, Raqqa and Kirkuk -- an oil-rich province in Iraq -- no longer exist.
Instead, the term "wilaya" is now used to refer to large chunks of territory
like Iraq and Syria, along with Somalia, East Asia, Tajikistan and the
Egyptian Sinai. The administrative reshuffle marks a clear switch from 2014,
when ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi boasted of having erased the
"imperialist" design that divided the Middle East. The proclamation was made
with great fanfare as militants drove bulldozers across the Syrian-Iraqi
border, symbolically destroying one of the frontiers drawn up by colonial
powers as they carved out the modern Middle East from the ruins of the
Ottoman Empire after World War I. After years battling ISIS, Iraqi troops
are now redeployed along most of the border with Syria, across which
extremists and weapons have long flowed unimpeded. On the Syrian side,
separate offensives by forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and
a US-backed coalition have pushed ISIS militants out of most of the
territory they once controlled. "The change proves Daesh's weakness and the
loss of much of its leadership," the security official told AFP, using an
Arabic acronym for ISIS. ISIS's restructure "shows its central command lacks
confidence in its wilaya commanders in Iraq and that it is reducing their
powers to one (central) leadership," the official said. Iraqi authorities
regularly announce the arrest or death of ISIS leaders and relatives of
Baghdadi, such as his son, who was killed in Syria in July by Russian
missiles. Baghdadi himself was thought to have been killed several times,
and the US has offered up a $25 million reward for information leading to
his capture or death. In a purported new audio message released on Wednesday
to mark the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, Baghdadi called on his followers
to "not give up the jihad against their enemy". "Baghdadi's speech was one
of consolation and condolence," said Hisham al-Hashemi, an expert on radical
groups. It was an "acknowledgment of defeat... but (Baghdadi) urged those
remaining to persevere", he said. The security official said that after
losing ground in Iraq and Syria, "ISIS leadership is now focused on a global
vision" modeled on Al-Qaeda. Its cross-border state now destroyed, ISIS is
instead likely to focus on spreading shock and terror around the world
through dramatic attacks. In a first, Baghdadi used his 55-minute recording
to call for attacks in the West, saying an operation there would be "worth a
thousand" at home. Much of the address was reminiscent of approaches long
used by Al-Qaeda, according to Hashemi. In it, the ISIS leader scorns the
US, blasts Shiite Iran, and calls on Sunni Muslims in Iraq to denounce the
Shiite-dominated paramilitary units of the Hashed al-Shaabi.
Egypt Sentences to
Death Six for Assassinating Policeman, Attempting to Kill Others
Cairo- Mohammed Nabil Helmi/Asharq Al Awsat/August 29/18/An Egyptian court
on Tuesday sentenced six people to death for attacking a security checkpoint
north of Cairo and killing a policeman. The Cairo Criminal Court handed
various prison sentences to six others in the case that dates back to 2016.
Militants attacked a security checkpoint in al-Khosous district in Qalubiya
province, killed a non-commissioned police officer and attempted to kill
other officers, prosecutors said. The court, headed by Judge Shaaban al-Shami,
issued its verdicts in the case on Tuesday. It also jailed two people for
life and four others, including three minors, for terms ranging from three
to 15 years. Sentences against the accused in the case are not final.
Defendants have the right to appeal the verdict before the Court of
Cassation. They were sentenced for allegedly forming and supporting a
terrorist group to try to topple the government and attack police and armed
forces personnel. The prosecution accused the defendants of establishing and
leading a terrorist group in 2016, contrary to the provisions of the law,
aimed at disrupting the constitution and laws, preventing state institutions
and public authorities from carrying out their work and attacking police and
armed forces, as well as training on the use of firearms to kill policemen.
They also committed the crime of assassinating Mustafa Mohamed Amin, the
police sergeant, deliberately while he was at a security point in the town
of Al Khosous, according to the indictment, in addition to assassinating
police officer Khalid Mohieddin and other security men. The indictment added
that they "possessed firearms, including machine guns, rifles, cartridges
and ammunition of which cannot be authorized to be used, and manufactured
two explosive devices."
Iraq: 17,000 People Sick from Contaminated Water
Baghdad/Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 29 August, 2018/A severe
water contamination crisis that has hit Iraq, especially in Basra
governorate, has raised fears of a cholera outbreak. Minister of Health
Adeela Hamoud announced during her last visit to Basra that 1,500 severe
cases of diarrhea had been recorded, but there was no cholera in the region.
Meanwhile, Director-General of the Public Health Directorate in Basra Riad
Abdul-Amir said that about 17,000 cases of colic and diarrhea were reported
due to contaminated water over the past two weeks, warning that around 20
percent of those cases carried the symptoms of cholera. "The hospitals in
Basra receive about 1,500 such cases on a daily basis," Abdul-Amir said. On
Monday, Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi urged local authorities to address
the water contamination issue and ensure sufficient water deliveries from
the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. The Prime Minister directed the Defense and
Transportation Ministries to ensure the safe transfer of drinking water to
the province. He also asked the Ministry of Energy to provide fuel for water
tankers heading to Basra. The religious authority in Najaf and the
Secretariat of Hussein Shrine in Karbala also addressed the issue and formed
a crisis unit to help the people overcome the crisis. "The Representative of
Supreme Religious Authority, Sheikh Abdul-Mehdi El-Kerbelaey, held an
extensive meeting with various officials of the Shrine, including those from
the finance, maintenance, electricity and mechanisms departments, to discuss
the formation of a crisis unit to save the people of the city of Basra," the
media department of the Shrine said in a statement. The statement pointed
out that Kerbelaey ordered the members of the cell to visit Basra to proceed
with the maintenance of desalination plants and street lights, in addition
to providing the residents with suitable drinking water. Kerbelaey said
during the Friday sermon that despite all appeals to the government “for a
temporary solution for water contamination in Basra, the efforts the
government is making are still below the threshold for a temporary
relief.”The Iraqi High Commission for Human Rights in Basra indicated that
Abo al-Khasib General Hospital in Basra receives daily more than 400 people
sickened by polluted water. A delegation of the Commission visited the
hospital and met with dozens of citizens suffering from symptoms caused by
contaminated water. The Commission noted that Abo al-Khasib is the only
hospital capable of treating such cases. Sources in Basra told Asharq Al-Awsat
that the Directorate of Education warned that cholera could spread among
students at the start of the academic year due to polluted water in schools.
The sources confirmed that citizens staged a demonstration outside the
Department of Health, protesting the absence of solutions to the crisis. The
Syndicate of Journalists in Basra also organized a protest, urging the
central and local governments "not to make unrealistic promises and to take
practical steps to address the crisis."
11 Killed in Western Iraq Suicide Car Bombing
Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 29 August, 2018/A suicide bomber blew up a
vehicle in the town of Al-Qaim in western Iraq on Wednesday, killing at
least 11 people and wounding 16 others, police said. Among the wounded, 11
were civilians and the other five were security personnel, police Captain
Mahmud Jassem told AFP. Maj. Gen. Qasem al-Dulaimi said the attacker drove a
booby-trapped vehicle into a joint security checkpoint managed by the Iraqi
army and the Popular Mobilization Forces at the southern entrance to the
town. ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack, according to its news
agency Amaq.The town on the Syrian border was one of the last in Iraq to be
recaptured from ISIS in November 2017.
Iran Foreign Minister in Surprise Erdogan Talks
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 29/18/Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad
Javad Zarif was on Wednesday holding previously unannounced talks with
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara, the Turkish presidency said.Zarif
went into the talks at the headquarters of Erdogan's ruling party, as
expectations grow of an offensive in the Idlib province of northwest Syria
bordering Turkey by Tehran's ally President Bashar al-Assad.
Khamenei Says Ready to Abandon Nuclear Deal if Needed
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 29/18/Iran's supreme leader warned
Wednesday the country could abandon its nuclear deal with world powers if it
no longer served its interests, even as economic and political pressure
mounted on the government. "Naturally, if we reach the conclusion that (the
nuclear deal) is no longer maintaining our national interests, we will put
it aside," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a meeting with the cabinet,
according to his website. He said Iran must not "pin its hopes" on Europe,
despite European efforts to salvage the nuclear deal following the
withdrawal of the United States. The government of President Hassan Rouhani
has been battered by the return of U.S. sanctions, which has triggered a
rapid departure of foreign firms and ended his hopes of attracting
large-scale investment. His political enemies are circling, with parliament
announcing that two more of his ministers could be impeached in the coming
days. The labour and economy ministers have already been sacked by
parliament this month and motions have been accepted to vote on impeaching
his industries and education ministers in the coming days. Khamenei insisted
the political tumult was a sign of the strength of Iran's democracy. He
praised the tough questioning Rouhani received in parliament on Tuesday as
"a glorious show of the power of the Islamic republic and the
self-confidence of officials."Differences between officials are "natural",
he added, though he said they should not be covered by the media "because
the people would become worried."Tuesday's grilling in parliament was the
first for Rouhani in five years as president, and lawmakers slammed his
handling of five economic issues, ranging from unemployment to the
collapsing value of the currency. In voting at the end of the session, they
declared they were unsatisfied with four of his responses.
'Day and night'
Under parliamentary rules, the issues could then have been referred for
judicial review, but parliament speaker Ali Larijani -- a close ally of
Rouhani -- said on Wednesday there were no legal grounds for doing so.
Parliament can theoretically impeach Rouhani, but he has the protection of
Khamenei, who has previously said removing the president would "play into
the hands of the enemy." Instead, Khamenei called on officials to work
together "day and night" to resolve the country's economic problems. Iran's
currency has lost around half its value since the U.S. announced it was
withdrawing from the nuclear deal in May, and further pain is expected when
sanctions on its crucial oil sector are reimposed in November. Conservative
opponents of Rouhani, who have long opposed his outreach to the West, are
smelling blood. Next in their sights is his minister of industry, mines and
business, Mohammad Shariatmadari, who is accused of failing to prevent high
inflation, particularly in the car industry. A motion was also filed on
Wednesday to vote on the impeachment of Education Minister Mohammad Bathaei,
over a series of issues linked to school budgets, the curriculum and alleged
mismanagement.
War of Words between Hamas, Fatah on Truce with Israel
Ramallah - Kifah Zboun/Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 29 August,
2018/Fatah and Hamas movements have stepped up their dispute over a truce
deal with Israel in the Gaza Strip as Egypt has sought to push
inter-Palestinian reconciliation forward. Fatah has presented a
comprehensive response to the Egyptian reconciliation document and warned
that it will have an immediate response if Hamas strikes a truce deal with
Israel before completing the reconciliation process. Hamas rejected the
warning, accusing the Palestinian Authority (PA) of besieging Gaza. Member
of Fatah Central Committee Hussein al-Sheikh asserted that a ceasefire is
not possible before “achieving reconciliation.” He warned that the
Palestinian leadership will consider other alternatives if reconciliation is
not achieved. Sheikh didn’t refer to Egypt’s role in the process, but said
Hamas and others want to topple the PA to satisfy Israel and the US.
He added that if President Mahmoud Abbas accepted the truce according to the
standards set by Israel, he would immediately win praise and receive the
Nobel Prize. The Fatah member asserted that the movement supports a
comprehensive truce that must include the West Bank and not just the Gaza
Strip.
Abbas has reportedly criticized the potential ceasefire agreement between
Israel and Hamas, saying in private conversations that such a deal would
only be reached “over my dead body,” according to a top Fatah official. The
official explained that if the “agreement is signed without the PA’s
permission, it will be considered illegal and amount to treason.” According
to the official, Abbas was also furious at Egypt. Hamas responded to the
criticism, claiming there is a “national consensus” among the Palestinian
people in favor of a long-term Gaza ceasefire with Israel.
Hamas spokesperson Abdel Latif al-Qanua slammed Fatah, saying Hamas is not
playing a role in an international deal that gives up Palestinian lands,
recognizes the occupier or destroys the national project, “as you did.”
“We didn’t recognize the Zionist entity and sanctify the security
coordination, as you did at the expense of our people,” he added.
Hamas dismissed the PA criticism as “worthless” and asserted it was “not
fooling anybody — the people still support the resistance and we will keep
our hand on the trigger to defend the Palestinian people from the Zionist
occupation.”The statement called on the PA and Fatah to withdraw their
recognition of Israel, stop the security coordination with it and lift the
sanctions imposed on Gaza. Qanua’s verbal attack on Fatah came as another
senior Hamas official, Osama Hamdan, accused Abbas of disrupting the
completion of intra-Palestinian reconciliation. Hamdan said on Monday that
even if a ceasefire is achieved with Israel, Hamas will continue to "build
its capabilities because it has no faith in the Zionist enemy." "The
ceasefire arrangement does not include the construction of a seaport or an
airport outside the Palestinian territories; everything published so far on
this matter is a lie," declared Hamdan. “If a ceasefire is achieved, then we
will not delay the lifting of the siege and the sanctions on the Gaza
Strip,” he concluded. Member of the Central Committee of Fatah Movement and
Executive Committee of the Palestinian Liberation Front Azzam al-Ahmad
offered the movement’s final response to the Egyptian document, saying it
included mechanisms on the implementation of reconciliation. Ahmad added
that the message stipulated the importance of implementing all clauses that
Fatah and Hamas have agreed on. He hoped the demands will be met, including
the return of ministers to Gaza to assume their work normally, ending the
mission of the committee assigned to study the situation of employees hired
by Hamas during the division, and terminating the committees in charge of
reconciliation, public freedoms, and security. “We want to settle the issue
and focus on confronting the malign US strategy biased to Israel,” Ahmad
stated, asserting that a ceasefire agreement with Israel should be reached
only after achieving reconciliation. Egypt has informed the Palestinian
factions that the talks will be postponed. Fatah is now waiting for Cairo’s
response after meeting with Hamas officials. Fatah wants comprehensive
empowerment, including the security services, the judiciary, land authority
and tax collection, and Hamas wants a partnership that will ensure that its
employees, including the military, are taken into account and the sanctions
are lifted on the Gaza Strip. Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah renewed his call
on Hamas to respond to the president's plan to restore national unity
without conditions or restrictions.
Brazil
Deploys Military to Boost Security at Venezuela Border
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 29/18/Brazilian President Michel Temer
signed a decree Tuesday to send the army to "guarantee law and order" on the
border with crisis-hit Venezuela after recent violent clashes. Earlier this
month, more than a thousand homeless Venezuelan immigrants who had flooded
over the border into Brazil's northwestern Roraima state were driven back by
an angry mob that rampaged through their makeshift tent following rumours a
local shopkeeper had been brutally beaten by migrants. Temer said his
measure was aimed at providing "security for Brazilian citizens but also
Venezuelan immigrants fleeing their country."He also branded Venezuela's
crisis as "tragic," saying it "threatens the harmony of practically the
entire continent."Temer called on "the international community to adopt
diplomatic measures" to halt the Venezuelan exodus, as economic and
political crises under President Nicolas Maduro's regime drive hundreds of
thousands to leave in hope of finding a better life elsewhere. "Brazil
respects the sovereignty of other states but we have to remember that a
country is only sovereign if it respects its people and looks after them,"
he added in an ominous warning to Maduro.
The United Nations says some 2.3 million Venezuelans are living outside
their homeland, with 1.6 million of those having left since 2015. Oil-rich
but over-reliant, Venezuela is in a fourth year of recession brought on by a
crash in oil prices in 2014. Some 96 percent of the country's revenue is
generated through crude. The exodus has strained Venezuela's neighbours,
Colombia and Brazil in particular, but also other countries hosting
thousands of migrants such as Ecuador, Peru and Chile.Like Brazil, Peru has
seen outbreaks of anti-Venezuelan xenophobia.
Urgent situation
"It's not just Brazil enduring the consequences, but Peru, Ecuador, Colombia
and other Latin American countries," Temer said in a televised address.
"That's why we urgently have to find the way to change this situation." Some
60,000 refugees are in Brazil, while Peru recently tightened its border
controls on Venezuelans after seeing more than 400,000 enter the country.
Temer didn't reveal how many soldiers would be deployed to Roraima, but
Defense Minister Joaquim Silva e Luna said "troops are already in place" at
the border. Security Minister Sergio Etchegoyen warned that Brazil "needs to
discipline" the influx of migrants. Meanwhile, Brazil said it was
negotiating with Caracas to avoid Venezuela's state electricity provider
Corpelec turning off the lights in Roraima over a $40 million unpaid debt.
Brazil can't pay it because of European Union and United States sanctions
against Venezuela. Brazil's Foreign Minister Aloysio Nunes told AFP the
country wanted to settle its debt but was struggling to find "a financial
path" without breaking "the restrictions and sanctions applied by Europe and
the United States" against Maduro and his government. Nunes said Brasilia
has proposed an "exchange of accounts" since Venezuela is indebted to Brazil
"far more than the $40 million we owe the company."Any electricity cut would
not only hit hard the small and impoverished state of Roraima, but also the
thousands of Venezuelans who have fled there, thus exacerbating their
already precarious situation. Brazil has studied potential short and
long-term solutions for Roraima's electricity but those are both costly and
harmful to the environment, while there is also the possibility of inciting
a territorial conflict with indigenous people in the area.
The Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous
sources published
on
August 29-30/18
Iran, Russia Prepare to Battle Each Other Over Control of Post-war Syria
إيران وروسيا تستعدان للمواجهة من أجل السيطرة على سوريا ما بعد الحرب
عاموس هريل وامير تايبون من الهآررتس:
Amos Harel and Amir Tibon/Haaretz/August 29/18
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/67087/amos-harel-and-amir-tibon-haaretz-iran-russia-prepare-to-battle-each-other-over-control-of-post-war-syria-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B3-%D9%87%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%84-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%AA/
U.S. sanctions are pushing Iran to try and carve out even more profits from
Syria's post-war reconstruction
The events of the past days in Syria have one thing in common: as the war in
Syria is entering its final stages, a new battle is emerging. Both Russia
and Iran, who supported the Assad regime throughout the civil war, are
expecting to reap the benefits of Assad’s victory. While the two countries
have long been allies in the Syrian arena, their interests sometimes
diverge, especially as both are eyeing the financial rewards of Syria’s
upcoming reconstruction process.
The tensions in Syria escalated on Tuesday when Russia moved naval forces
towards the Syrian coast and NATO criticized Moscow for its aggressive
moves. Russian media called the deployment Moscow's largest naval buildup
since it entered the Syrian conflict in 2015. The reinforcement comes as
Russia's ally, Syrian President Bashar Assad, is believed to be considering
an assault on the last big rebel-held enclave, Idlib in the north.
The Russian naval force was sent to the region at the same time that the
Syrian regime announced the signing of a new security agreement with Iran,
following a visit by Iran’s Defense Minister to Damascus earlier this week.
As part of the agreement, Iran will help rebuild Syria’s military and
defense industries.
Israel believes the Iranians are sending a message: we are here to stay. The
rehabilitation of the Syrian army, which is in very poor condition after the
war, is not high on the list of threats that concern Israel.
Russia and Iran have both supported Assad over the past seven years. During
this time, they did not directly clash with each other in Syria, but Israeli
officials believe the two countries are at odds on some issues related to
Syria’s future. The contracts for Syria's reconstruction, for which both
countries are vying, will likely include some of Syria’s oil reserves – at
least those that have survived the war. A behind-the-scenes battle over who
will control the Assad regime in the “new Syria” is now already under way.
One country that is likely going to stay out of the infighting over the
reconstruction process is the United States. The Trump administration has no
clear policy on the “day after” in Syria, except for one principle: No
American money will be spent on it
The American ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, made that point
clear at a speech she gave on Tuesday in Washington, explaining that Russia
and the Assad regime “own” Syria now. “You broke it, you own it,” Haley said
at a summit organized by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
Haley added that perhaps Russia and Assad expect the United States to lead
the reconstruction process of Syria, but “we are going to stay out of it.”
Russia and the Assad regime, she said, “now own a great pile of rubble” in
Syria.
The concern is that without any American involvement, the “great pile of
rubble” could turn into a future source of income for Iran, exactly at the
same time that its economy is being put under pressure because of U.S.
sanctions. In Damascus, the Iranian Defense Minister spoke about Iran’s
commitment to Syria’s reconstruction, hinting at such a calculation.
One of Tehran’s goals is to take over Syria’s telecom industry, which was
damaged during the war, but not completely destroyed. Matthew Brodsky, a
Middle East analyst in Washington, recently published a review of the Assad
regime’s financial situation, in which he mentioned telecom agreements
between Iran and Syria that have already been signed, explaining that “the
telecommunications sector is clearly important to Iran not only for the
financial return but for eavesdropping on the population. Hezbollah’s
telecommunications contracts in Lebanon have paid enormous dividends in this
regard.”
Brodsky, who is a senior fellow at the Security Studies Group think-tank,
also mentioned a deal between Iran and Syria that will allow Iran to develop
phosphate mines in Syria, although it is not clear if Iran will have
exclusive rights to those mines or have to share them with Russia. In
addition, he wrote about leases between Iran and the Syrian regime involving
some 12,000 acres of land in Homs and Tartous provinces, which could be used
for building oil and gas terminals.
Another financial benefit for Iran that could emerge from the reconstruction
process is the transfer of agricultural lands in Syria, which were left
behind by Syrian citizens turned refugees over the last seven years, into
Iranian hands. Brodsky wrote about the Assad regime's “repopulation schemes”
that would turn some of those lands over to members of the pro-Iranian
Shi’ite militias, as a means of helping them entrench their presence in
Syria. Some in Israel believe these lands will also, at some point, host new
construction projects, which will be built by Iranian companies.
Two weeks ago, Ariane Tabatabai, an expert on Iran and a political scientist
at the Rand Corporation, told Haaretz that Israel’s goal of getting Iran out
of Syria is unrealistic, in light of the Islamic Republic’s expectation to
make profits from the reconstruction process. “It’s hard to see them going
anywhere,” she said. “The Russians don't have the will to take Iran
completely out of Syria. The Iranians have a significant presence in Syria,
and Russia has no incentive to try and force them out, something they may
not even be able to achieve.” The American sanctions only increase Iran’s
interest in carving out whatever profits it can from Syria’s reconstruction,
she added.
In order to see the benefits it hopes to get, however, Iran will also need
other countries – mostly China, Europe and the Gulf countries – to invest in
Syria’s reconstruction. Over the last few days, there have been calls from
human rights groups and former European officials not to invest in Syria’s
reconstruction as long as Assad continues to commit massive human rights
violations.
Carl Bildt, a former Swedish Foreign Minister, tweeted this week that “we
should not listen to Russian pleas for money to rebuild what they bombed in
Syria. All signs point at Assad blocking returns [of Syrian refugees] and
wanting to profit from reconstruction.”
Ken Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, expressed a similar
view, writing in the British newspaper The Independent: “Long before any
talk of providing reconstruction assistance for Syria, which in any event
would require lifting separate targeted sanctions, European governments
should call out Russia’s complicity in Syria’s war crimes and vigorously
press the Kremlin to end these atrocities and stop underwriting Syria’s
repression.”
It was the deployment of the Russian air force three years ago that tilted
the scales of the war in favor of Assad, who at that time controlled only a
quarter of the country's territory. Even today, Russia maintains its
military presence in Syria to ensure the regime's upper hand. But it has
other strategic interests, primarily maintaining access to the Mediterranean
through the port under its control in Tartous in northern Syria.
Last month, the Assad regime completed its takeover of the Syrian Golan
Heights, and after Russia agreed with Iran that Iranian forces would be kept
at a distance of 85 kilometers from Israel's border with one notable
exception: Iranians are still present in and around Damascus.
In Israel, meanwhile, tension has been noted even within the close alliance
of Iran and the Assad regime. In recent weeks, there were two incidents in
the eastern part of Syria, close to the border with Iraq, in which the
Syrian military attacked Shi’ite militias associated with Iran. These
attacks appear to be part of a local, internal fight over dominance in that
specific region, which is critical for Iran’s plans of creating a “land
bridge” to the Mediterranean through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.
The same area was the site of an air strike two months ago, which some media
outlets reported was conducted by Israel.
The bottom line is that the war in Syria has already been won by Assad. But
now the fight over the “day after” is beginning, and it will include power
struggles between all the different parties active in the Syrian arena.
Iran at the Hague: Remembering America as a ‘Best
Friend’
Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/August 29/18
More than six decades after Iran first filed a suit with the International
Court at The Hague, the Islamic Republic has returned to “demand justice”
from the 15 judges sitting on its benches.
Iran first went to the court in June 1951 when then Prime Minister Mohammad
Mossadegh filed a suit to force Great Britain to accept Iran’s decision to
nationalize its oil industry and dispossess the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company
which was partly owned by the British government.
The Oil Nationalization Act had been passed by the Iranian National Assembly
(Majlis) on 15 March and received the royal assent two days later. Six weeks
later the Shah appointed Mossadegh as Prime Minister with the mission to
carry out the nationalization act.
Taking the case to the International Court was part of Iran’s efforts to
mobilize international support for nationalization. After months of
deliberation, the court voted in favor of Iran, a decision that was
disdainfully ignored by London.
On Monday, Iran returned to lodge another complaint, this time against the
United States, for alleged breach of a treaty signed by the two nations in
1955. According to Iran’s lawyers in the first sessions of the court
hearing, by re-imposing some sanctions on Iran President Donald Trump’s
administration has violated at least six provisions of the treaty.
The lawyers have applied for “a temporary stay” on the sanctions pending a
final judgment by the court, a judgment that might take years to be
finalized.
“Tehran’s political aim is to obtain a few months of delay in the imposition
of new sanctions by Trump,” says Mohsen Golara, an Iranian jurist. “The hope
is that such a delay would last until after the mid-term elections in the
United States in which President Trump’s Republican Party may lose its
majorities in the Congress.
Iran’s sympathizers in the US, including former Secretary of State John
Kerry, have privately advised Iranian leaders to play for time by sticking
to the “nuke deal” made under President Barack Obama, pending a weakening of
Trump’s position as president.
This is important because Trump intends to impose new sanctions through what
is known as Executive Order, a constitutional instrument that allows the
president to bypass the Congress in certain domains. In exchange, the
Congress has the constitutional right to annul any executive order it might
regard as “exceeding the president’s constitutional powers.”
Trump isn’t the first US president to use the executive order device to
impose sanctions on Iran. The first such order, numbered 12170, was issued
by President Jimmy Carter in 1980 to seize Iranian assets in the US. At the
time Iran had some $22 billion of its oil revenues deposited in two major
American banks.
Carter’s move came in response to the seizure of the US Embassy in Tehran
and the holding of its diplomats as hostages. Technically, the seizure of
the embassy and its diplomats was a 'casus belli' (an act of war) but Carter
hoped to ensure the release of the hostages through diplomatic channels. An
executive order imposing sanctions was regarded as a good compromise for a
president who did not wish to use force.
In the end, direct and indirect talks did ensure the release of the hostages
with the signature of the Algiers Agreement in January 1981. Iran promised
to no longer seize American hostages, a promise it did not keep by
proceeding to seize more than a dozen other hostages, this time through
Hezbollah proxies in Lebanon. The Americans reciprocated the bad faith by
delaying the release of Iran’s frozen assets for decades.
After Carter, all US presidents issued executive orders on relations with
Iran, often to impose new and tougher sanctions. Obama was the only
exception in the context of his tacit support for the Islamic Republic. The
1955 agreement now under discussion at The Hague is called “Treaty of
Friendship, Economic Relations and Consular Rights”. Its signature gave Iran
a place among nations enjoying a privileged position in relations with the
United States. Negotiated by Iran’s Foreign Minister at the time Abdullah
Entezam and his US counterpart John Foster Dulles the treaty gave Iran most
favored nation access to the US market with export guarantees and credit
facilities backed by the federal government.
More importantly, it opened the way for Iran to purchase military hardware
from the US, starting a process at the end of which in the 1970s Iran had
access to the most sophisticated American weaponry bar nuclear arms. The
1955 treaty marked the beginning of growing US influence in Iran and led to
the signing of 18 other treaties and agreements which established a firm
alliance between the two nations. One such agreement, under the US Atoms for
Peace Program, saw the installation of Iran’s first nuclear reactor, fully
paid and for years managed by the US. (It started full operations in 1959).
The US also offered scholarships for the first 20 Iranians who studied
nuclear sciences in American universities.
Another adjunct accord provided for the training of Iranian military and
intelligence personnel in the US, especially fighter pilots and technicians.
Close cooperation between the CIA and SAVAK, Iran’s security service, began
with that treaty.
The 1955 treaty also established a process of economic negotiations that in
1975 led to the $50 billion trade contract signed by Iran’s then Economy
Minister Hushang Ansary and the US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. At
the time, the agreement was dubbed “the biggest trade deal in human
history.”Iran might find it hard to win a favorable decision at The Hague
for two reasons. The first is that the US could argue that the sanctions
envisaged by Trump are related to the “nuke deal” which is not related to
the 1955 treaty. And since “the nuke deal” has no legal status it would be
hard for Iran to build a case around its alleged violation.
That point was highlighted by Seed Jalili, the former Secretary of Iran’s
High Council of National Security, in his speech this week. He said: “They
{President Rouhani’s team} claim that the nuke deal {JCPOA} is a UN Security
Council document and that anyone who violates it violates a UN decision. If
that is the case, why don’t you take the issue to the Security Council?”
Jalili is being disingenuous.
Rouhani and his team often claim that the UN Security Council somehow
endorsed JCPOA in one of its seven resolutions on the Iran nuclear issue.
However, they also insist that Iran has never accepted any of those
resolutions. In other words, they demand that everyone respect the JCPOA on
the basis of a UN resolution that Tehran itself rejects.The second reason
why Iran’s chances of winning at The Hague are slim is that the 1955 treaty
clearly states, in its Article II, that the signatories could take their
complaints to the International Court of Justice only after negotiations
between them have failed to produce a compromise. Well, Trump says he is
ready to enter negotiations with Iranians without any preconditions.
However, ” Supreme Guide” Ali Khamenei, the ultimate decision-maker in
Tehran, has formally forbidden any talks with the US on any subject. Going
to The Hague may be a ploy by Rouhani, now isolated and fighting for his
political survival, to evoke the memory of Mossadegh and hide his inability
to show a way out of the maze Iran finds itself.
Facebook Is Making the US a Political Dystopia
Leonid Bershidsky/Bloomberg/August 29/18
US elections are threatening to become the “World Cup of information
warfare, in which US adversaries and allies battle to impose their various
interests on the American electorate.” That powerful statement comes from a
knowledgeable source: Facebook’s former Chief Security Officer Alex Stamos,
who left the company this month.
Stamos suggested ways to avoid this dystopian future in a post for the blog
Lawfare. He confessed that his “personal responsibility for the failures of
2016 continues to weigh” on him. But he hasn’t been able to strike enough
distance from Facebook to admit that it’s the social networks’ key features,
not their security bugs, that are responsible for making US democracy and
its marketplace of ideas vulnerable to dishonest, unscrupulous actors, both
foreign and domestic.
His proposals include legal standards to fight online disinformation and a
cybersecurity agency, separate from law enforcement or the intelligence
agencies, that would be focused on defending against threats. Stamos, who
will teach at Stanford University in September, also wrote it was necessary
to decide “how finely political influence campaigns should be allowed to
divvy up the electorate, even when those campaigns are domestically run and
otherwise completely legal.” He calls for quicker law enforcement, political
and cyber responses to meddling.
This all makes sense — up to a point.
There is no way for any censor, with or without government authority, to
determine that information is false before the social networks’ viral
distribution mechanisms disseminate it far and wide. Unlike a professional
media organization, no one on Facebook or Twitter is legally or ethically
obliged to correct false information. Nor are the platforms themselves.
Besides, there’s often no single source for the disinformation — lots of
entities, fake and legitimate, can spread it at the same time.
The advent of the social networks has made media a free-for-all. If anyone,
named or anonymous, foreign of domestic, paid or not, sane or crazy, honest
or crooked can be a news source with an unlimited distribution potential,
there’s no way to rein in disinformation. In this kind of marketplace,
anything goes because everyone competes for attention on the same terms.
That’s the great democratic appeal of social media.
It’s also what powers Stamos’s bleak vision of an infowar World Cup, in
which US adversaries such as Iran, China and North Korea, domestic influence
groups, along with US allies seeking to promote candidates, can use the same
tricks as the Russians, whose social network campaign in the 2016
presidential election “required only basic proficiency in English, knowledge
of the US political scene available to any consumer of partisan blogs, and
the tenacity to exploit the social media platforms’ complicated content
policies and natural desire to not censor political speech.”
Stamos clearly is uneasy about the microtargeting of political messages to
specific voters. But microtargeting is the core of the social media
platforms’ business models. If it’s legitimate for selling goods, why
shouldn’t it be used to spread ideas? If direct political messaging were
regulated but microtargeting wasn’t, political actors would find other ways
to propagate their message: books, media articles or charitable causes. That
kind of regulation probably won’t be a deterrent. When Russia banned alcohol
advertising on television, companies started taking out ads for mineral
water with the same labels as their vodka.
The social networks are extremely efficient at spreading information within
filter bubbles that exclude those who don’t belong, with economics based on
slicing and dicing the audience after pressuring people to give up as much
personal data as possible. Any regulation that doesn’t change these basic
rules will be unable to fend off Stamos’s vision of the evolution of
American politics. Any regulation that does change these operating
principles will threaten to kill off social media as we know it.
Maybe that wouldn’t be the worst outcome, given the emerging links between
the platforms and politically motivated violence. The transformation of
social media could be the path toward a cleaner, more honestly competitive
democracy, too. It’s likely too late, however, to try squeezing the
toothpaste back into the tube; it’s not just the 2018 midterms that it’s
“too late to protect,” as Stamos writes, but all elections in the social
media-infested US Unless, of course, voters eventually take matters into
their own hands and learn to resist online manipulation.
Should It Be Illegal
for Prosecutors to "Flip" Witnesses?
by Alan M. Dershowitz/Gatestone Institute/August 29/18
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12935/flipping-witnesses
It is already illegal for a lawyer to offer a witness a valuable
consideration for providing testimony -- if the lawyer is a defense
attorney. If any defense attorney offers a witness an inducement to testify
favorably to his client -- even if his testimony is 100% truthful -- that
lawyer will be disbarred, prosecuted and imprisoned. But it is perfectly
legal, indeed widely regarded as commendable, for prosecutors to offer major
inducements in order to get witnesses to testify against their targets.
Here is what the statute says: "Whoever... directly or indirectly, gives,
offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the
testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a
witness" is guilty of a felony. [U.S. Code § 201 (c)(2), emphasis added]
Every day, these tactics are being used against ordinary Americans caught up
in our deeply flawed criminal justice system that relies far too heavily on
the testimony of flipped witnesses.
Recently President Trump said that "flipping" a witness to incriminate a
prosecutorial target "almost ought to be outlawed," saying that individuals
who flip are often untruthful.
This statement raises the important question of whether it should be illegal
to offer a witness a valuable consideration for providing testimony, as
prosecutors allegedly did with Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn.
Interestingly, it is already illegal for a lawyer to do that -- if the
lawyer is a defense attorney. If any defense attorney offers a witness an
inducement to testify favorably to his client -- even if his testimony is
100% truthful -- that lawyer will be disbarred, prosecuted and imprisoned.
But it is perfectly legal, indeed widely regarded as commendable, for
prosecutors to offer major inducements in order to get witnesses to testify
against their targets. These inducements include money, freedom from
imprisonment and even life itself.
There are cases in which courts have allowed prosecutors to pay witness's
contingent fees -- that is, bonuses -- if their testimony results in
convictions. There are cases in which prosecutors have threatened to seek
the death penalty unless a witness flips against a co-defendant. There are
cases in which prosecutors threaten to prosecute wives, children, parents
and siblings of witnesses unless they flip, to offer 10- or 20-year
reductions in sentences in exchange for favorable testimony.
No wonder Judge T.S. Ellis, who presided over the first Manafort trial,
observed that flipped witnesses sometimes have an inducement not only to
"sing" but to "compose" -- that is, to embellish. Michael Cohen may have
been composing when he said through his lawyer, that President Trump knew
about the Trump Tower meeting between his son (Donald Trump Jr.) and a
Russian. Cohen's lawyer has now, commendably, walked back this accusation.
You might wonder how all this is legal in light of the federal statute that
prohibits the payment of anything of value in order to influence the
testimony of a witness. Here is what the statute says: "Whoever... directly
or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person,
for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be
given by such person as a witness" is guilty of a felony. [U.S. Code § 201
(c)(2), emphasis added]
A literal reading of the statute would encompass the offers and threats
routinely made by prosecutors to secure the testimony of witnesses. After
all, it applies to "whoever," and "any," but the courts have ruled that
prosecutors are exempt from the words of the statute. Only defense attorneys
and their clients are covered by it, despite the broad language.
Several years ago, a U.S. Court of Appeals applied the language of the
statue to prosecutors, raising questions about the entire process of paying
witnesses for their testimony. But that decision was quickly reversed by a
ruling that continued the exemption of prosecutors from the coverage of the
statute.
The only requirement is that prosecutors must inform the judge, jury and
defense attorneys of all payments and promises made to witnesses. But such
disclosure would not be enough to exempt defense attorneys or defendants
from the criminal penalties provided by the witness tampering statute. This
disparity unlevels the playing field of our adversary system of justice.
Civil libertarians and criminal defense attorneys have long been skeptical
of the widespread tactics used by prosecutors to intimidate, induce, buy or
rent witnesses. We understand how central this tactic is in the way
prosecutors bring cases today. Coupled with the other side of the coin --
under which defendants who go to trial receive multiples of the sentence
they would have received had they pleaded guilty -- these twin tactics
explain why so few cases today ever get before a jury: Fewer than 10% in
federal court. It is far more advantageous to cooperate with prosecutors
than to challenge them.
Notwithstanding the importance of these tactics, they should raise troubling
concerns among anyone concerned with basic fairness.
So, I welcome President Trump's statement about the unfairness of our
present system of flipping witnesses, even though I realize it is somewhat
self-serving. Would he and his supporters be equally concerned if a Special
Counsel or other prosecutors were using these tactics against his political
opponents? Nevertheless, it is important to have these issues raised and
debated by all Americans. Today they are being used against Republicans,
tomorrow they may be used against Democrats, and every day, they are being
used against ordinary Americans caught up in our deeply flawed criminal
justice system that relies far too heavily on the testimony of flipped
witnesses.
*Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law Emeritus at
Harvard Law School and author of "The Case Against Impeaching Trump,"
Skyhorse Publishing, July 2018.
© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here
do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone
Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be
reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of
Gatestone Institute.
William Kilpatrick:
“Islam’s Thousand Year War on Christendom”
Raymond Ibrahim/August 29/18
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/67089/raymond-ibrahim-william-kilpatrick-islams-thousand-year-war-on-christendom/
Editor’s note: Author and former Boston College instructor, William
Kilpatrick, has just written the first review of my book, Sword and
Scimitar, which was released yesterday. Published by Crisis Magazine and
titled, “Islam’s Thousand Year War on Christendom,” Kilpatrick’s review
follows:
At a time when Catholic youth are taught that Islam means peace, pilgrimage
and prayer, and Catholic adults are under the impression that Muslims are a
misunderstood minority who only want to share their values and their baba
ghanoush, it’s refreshing to occasionally make contact with reality.
I mean “refreshing” here in the sense that a dive into chilly waters is
refreshing. I just finished reading Raymond Ibrahim’s Sword and Scimitar, a
history of fourteen centuries of war between Islam and the West, and the
effect is similar to the shocked-awake effect of a plunge into cold water.
Not that I didn’t have a general acquaintance with the history, but one
tends to forget the details, and the devil, as they say, is in the details.
Ibrahim supplies plenty of those. Moreover, the details are so shocking that
one is inclined to think that the devil was intimately involved in the
centuries-long jihad against Christendom.
Indeed, that’s exactly what many Christians of those times did think.
Muhammad and Islam were frequently referred to by popes and peasants alike
as “demonic,” “diabolic,” and “satanic.” For their part, Muslims had a
particular hatred of Christians. They considered the Christian belief in
Christ’s divinity to be a great sin against Allah. Wherever Muslim armies
went they desecrated and destroyed churches, broke crosses and statues, and
made a particular point of violating nuns and torturing priests and monks.
In short, the violent conflicts between Muslims and Christians were
primarily religious wars, not, as many modern historians suggest, wars for
resources or national interests. Some historians, it seems, are less
interested in past events than in finding ways to fit those events into
contemporary narratives. Their primary source is their own subjective
“modern” outlook. By contrast, Ibrahim, who reads both Arabic and Greek,
lets the Muslim and Christian witnesses to past events speak for themselves.
Thus, when speaking of the Janissaries—Christian boys who were snatched from
their parents and forced to become soldiers of Islam—Ibrahim, relying on
centuries-old manuscripts, recounts the horror of the abductions, the abuse
of the boys, and their transformation into Islamic true believers who were
then turned loose against their former kin. By contrast, according to modern
academics, the indoctrination of the Janissaries was “the equivalent of
sending a child away for a prestigious education and training for a
lucrative career.”
Despite the passage of more than a thousand years, the Muslim-Christian
conflict was marked by certain constants. There is a remarkable continuity
of belief and behavior—especially on the part of the Muslims.
One of the recurring themes is that of world conquest commanded by Allah.
Muslims justified all of their wars and depredations during this immense
stretch of history by referring to the Koran and to the words and deeds of
Muhammad. Muslim leaders did not look upon their conquests as simply local
affairs, but as stepping stones to subjugating the earth. Thus, two common
refrains across the centuries were “we will stable our horses in
Constantinople” and “we will stable our horses in Rome”—and this from
warlords who may have been more than a thousand miles distant from either
Rome or Constantinople. When, in 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams
inquired of Tripoli’s ambassador to Britain why the Barbary States preyed on
American shipping, they were informed that according to the laws of their
prophet, Muslims had a “right and duty” to make war on all nations that did
not acknowledge their authority.
Another constant over the centuries is what Ibrahim calls the “win-win”
bargain. Whether a Muslim lived or died in battle, he was guaranteed a
reward either way. If he survived a raid or battle he would be rewarded with
plunder, slaves, and concubines. If he died, all his sins would be forgiven
by Allah, and he would be saved from the tortures of hell. In addition, he
would be rewarded in paradise with food, drink, and seventy-two “eternally
young” virgins (houris). Indeed, Muslim officers and preachers would
circulate among the troops before battle, reassuring them of their immortal
rewards should they die in battle. Many early chronicles attributed Muslim
zeal and fanaticism in battle to the “win-win” incentive.
Still another constant was slavery. One modern historian observes that “the
Islamic jihad looks uncomfortably like a giant slave trade.” The number of
the enslaved was astronomical. It was not unusual for a campaign to result
in the enslavement of 100,000 people. Between 1530 and 1780, the Barbary
Coast Muslims enslaved at least a million Europeans. Some three million
Slavs—Poles, Lithuanians, Russians, and Ukrainians—were enslaved between
1450 and 1783. Millions more were taken captive by the Muslim conquerors of
Spain. One caliph, Abd al-Rahman III, had 3,750 slaves and 6,300 concubines.
Slaving raids were also carried out in Ireland, England, Denmark, and as far
away as Iceland and Scandinavia. Slaves were used for labor, as soldiers,
and as concubines. White slaves were highly prized, especially blonde and
red-headed girls and women. Black slaves were routinely castrated. Although
few Americans are aware of the fact, the Arab and Ottoman slave trade lasted
far longer than the Atlantic slave trade and resulted in the loss of many
more lives.
Even America did not escape the reach of Islamic jihad. In its formative
years, as Ibrahim points out, America was forced to make jizya
payments—amounting to 16 percent of the federal budget—to Algeria for the
release of captured American sailors. Indeed, America’s first war as a
nation was a war against Islam. Over a period of thirty-two years, the
American navy fought an intermittent war to put an end to the Barbary
States’ attacks on American shipping. That is what is referred to by the
“shores of Tripoli” in the Marine Corps hymn.
Sword and Scimitar puts to rest several important myths. One of these myths
is that Christians were the aggressors in this long and bloody conflict.
This is decidedly not the case. For example, the modern idea that “the
crusades were unprovoked wars of conquest” is demonstrably false. As Ibrahim
points out, the crusades were a very belated response to 400 years of Muslim
conquest. Two-thirds of the Christian world had already been devoured by
Muslim armies before Pope Urban II made his appeal to the knights of
Christendom. Many regions which are now solidly Muslim were once Christian.
All of the twenty-two nations which now comprise the “Arab world” in the
Middle East and North Africa were Christian. The same is true of Turkey,
whose capital, Constantinople, was once the center of Christendom.
Perhaps the major lesson of Ibrahim’s timely book is that little has changed
over the centuries. One of the misleading myths of our time is that
al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, and other major terrorist groups have perverted
the meaning of Islam. They are variously described as having “hijacked,”
“distorted,” or “misunderstood” the true message of Islam. History says
otherwise. According to Ibrahim, “this book…records a variety of Muslims
across time and space behaving exactly like the Islamic State and for the
same reasons.” “Muslim hostility to the West,” he observes, “is not an
aberration but a continuation of Islamic history.” Against today’s wishful
thinking about Islam’s peaceful intentions, Sword and Scimitar documents
“what Muslims have actually done to and in the West for centuries.”
The historical record also reveals two perennial weaknesses of the Western
response to Islam… Keep reading
https://raymondibrahim.com/2018/08/29/william-kilpatrick-islams-thousand-year-war-on-christendom/
Ahmadinejad’s preoccupation with Serena Williams outfit
Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/August 29/18
The histrionics of former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never end with
the most recent one being his glorious defense of tennis player Serena Williams’
right to wear the full-length skin-tight black cat-suit.
The French Tennis Federation deemed it as dress code violation and said it would
no longer be allowed at the next French Open tennis tournament.
Ahmadinejad, who while delivering an address at the UN, famously said that Imam
Mahdi appeared to him and he was surrounded by a halo of light, wrote on
Twitter: “Why is the French Open disrespecting Serena Williams?”
He then added the more important message: “Unfortunately some people in all
countries including my country haven’t realized the true meaning of freedom.”
One of the last things one can believe is that a Khomeini project, that has been
so deeply immersed in his ideology, since early days, cares about the freedom of
women in France or America. This is a joke that cannot be taken seriously. It is
as if you believe that ISIS’s Baghdadi cares about protecting white dolphins or
black seals in the North Pole from being hunted.
The truth remains that the former Iranian president is not preoccupied with the
design and color of Serena’s outfit, the African-American tennis player, but
with arguing with the authorities. He has decided to shift to the role of the
opposition figure and the people’s hero and ride the wave of popular anger
against corruption and decline of the Iranian authority, beginning with the
Supreme Leader Khamenei himself.
Prior to that, Ahmadinejad posted a video calling on Iranian President Hassan
Rouhani to resign. “Mr. Rouhani, the people do not accept you. You, the
fundamentalists and the reformists are all accomplices in what’s happening.”The
truth remains that former Iranian president is not preoccupied with design and
color of Serena’s outfit but with arguing with the authorities
Popular anger
Ahmadinejad is trying to draw a new image of himself and is flirting with
popular anger in Iran. He is aligning himself with the youth, who reject the
rigidity of authorities.
Preventing women from attending football matches and sports events and
oppressing is a behavior that’s familiar to Tehran’s rulers, and this includes
the phase when Ahmadinejad himself was president.
Therefore, he does not have any moral legitimacy today to lead this speech of
individual rights, including lifting chains off women. In 2015, the Iranian
authorities detained Iranian-British woman Ghoncheh Ghavami after she tried to
watch a men-only volleyball match. She was sentenced to one year in prison.
Ahmadinejad is chattering about these things to spite today’s rulers. His
approach has upset the head of the Khomeini regime as, in December 2017,
Khamenei harshly criticized Ahmadinejad’s stances and accused him of spreading
“absurdities” against state institutions. The tales and falsehoods of Khomeinist
and populist Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are endless, and Khamenei’s cry today is: “Even
you Nejad”.
McCain’s glory and his fatal mistake
Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/August 29/18
Late Senator John McCain talked much about patriotism and values of
self-sacrifice for the sake of the nation but he, like most, did not care much
about these things if they contradicted his own interests, especially if it
meant him becoming America’s next president.
This is what happened after he nominated Sarah Palin, then-Alaska’s governor, to
be his vice presidential nominee during his presidential campaign. He chose her
for one reason, to fight the glamor surrounding media fame of his charismatic
rival Barack Obama.
The old McCain had history by his side but did not own the present and modern
media outlets that seek today’s celebrities and not heroes of the past.
To fill this vacuum, he chose a beautiful woman that wears glamorous clothes to
attract attention to his campaign and to decrease attention in his rival’s
campaign. However, this proved to be a fatal mistake. “How can he trust someone
like this naïve woman with America if something happens to him or he dies, and
this is probable considering his age.” This is what McCain’s critics, including
respected Republican figures like Dick Cheney, said. Cheney said that McCain’s
decision to select Palin as his VP indicates he lacks prudence and shows he is
not fit to be president.
It turned out that Palin harmed him a lot instead of benefiting him. She was an
easy target for the liberal media, which repeatedly made her fall into traps.
For example, journalist Katie Couric asked her a simple question about the
magazines she reads but Palin stuttered and didn’t answer. This showed Palin in
poor light, as an ignorant woman. McCain tried to confront these attempts to
entrap her and utilized his experience in fighting with politicians and
journalists but he could not get her on her feet.
Palin was a smart and opportunistic woman as she benefitted from McCain while
his dream collapsed before his eyes for the second time. She used the entire
opportunity to receive cheques and for magazine covers, books, programs,
interviews and reality shows about hunting that brought her millions.
It is said that McCain strongly regretted his decision, which is considered the
saddest stage of his life, a black mark that stained his image as a noble man
who put his country before himself. John McCain was the man of the world order.
He was aware of the importance of America’s allies who contributed toward
solidifying this order and brought stability and peace
Glorious phases
However, there are other glorious and happy phases which eventually shaped his
legacy and made the news of his departure a world event.
In his early days, McCain, who was a pilot, was taken hostage in northern
Vietnam, for five years. He was tortured, starved, humiliated and his hand and
ribs were repeatedly broken. After being released from captivity, he was viewed
as a hero in the eyes of the American people as he did not reveal any secrets
and did not betray the army’s brotherhood.
He wrote about the torture methods in the Vietnamese prison and which borrowed
the methods of the Middle Ages’ prisons, such as heavy chains which the prisoner
drags with his feet. His stance on the Syrian revolution is considered one of
the noblest. If McCain had been president, it is almost certain that Syria would
have been different from what it currently is. He was the voice of conscience,
which never kept silent over the horrific massacres committed by the Assad
regime and the Iranian militias.
McCain morally tormented his president Obama and reminded him of the horrific
photos of dead infants wrapped in shrouds but all his attempts failed.
McCain was the man of the world order and he was aware of the importance of
America’s allies who contributed toward solidifying this order and brought
stability and peace and fought rogue regimes like Tehran and terror groups like
al-Qaeda. Hence, we can understand his strong relationship with Saudi Arabia.
His relationship with Trump deteriorated before it even began although Trump has
done almost everything he called for. He punished Assad, besieged Iran, resumed
the war on terrorism and restored warmth to cold ties with friends.
On the domestic level, he decreased taxes and revived the economy. Despite that,
he did not gain his respect and affection and dealt a treacherous stab to Trump
when he voted against repealing Obamacare.
The Republicans
There are three explanations of this position. The first one is that McCain
joined the group of Republicans who believe that Trump hijacked the Republican
Party and tore it apart. This stance aims to maintain traditions and stop the
iron-clad Trump from running over all what’s left of conservative values.
The second one is based on personal dislike between the two men. Following
McCain’s sharp criticism, Trump launched a scathing attack on him and doubted
his glory at the Vietnam War by saying that heroes do not get captured.
Ever since, McCain held a grudge against him and wrote in his will that he did
not want Trump to attend his funeral. Let us not forget that McCain whose dream
was to become president saw Trump achieve this dream.
The third explanation is the difference between the two men. McCain sometimes
appeared as a grumpy old man, as an idealistic and preaching man to the extent
of intransigence and boredom. Trump, however, is realistic and loud to the
extent of being rude and crude.
Due to this mutual dislike, Trump reluctantly ordered lowering the American
flag. But media outlets allied to McCain’s position on Trump, focused on the
president as a man who is an outcast and hated by respectable Republican figures
– and not only by leftists and opposing circles.
China’s geo-economic interests and Middle East energy industry
Sabena Siddiqui/Al Arabiya/August 29/18
Strategically located near most of the major energy consuming countries in
Europe and Asia, the Middle East plays an intrinsic geo-economic role. However,
since 2014, ups and downs in oil prices have disturbed the dynamics of the
Middle Eastern energy industry.
As the political climate changed the regional equation, it evoked concern in
countries dependent on the Middle East for their energy supply. Most of all,
China’s energy security became prone to risks and this factor raised its stakes
in the geopolitics of the Middle East.
Being one of the fastest growing global economies today, China needs dependable
energy to keep its 6 percent growth rate sustainable. Consuming nearly one
fourth of global energy supplies per annum, China cannot afford to lose its
energy supply for any reason.
At home, it has limited domestic energy reserves with oil supplies at just 1.5
percent and gas at only 2.9 percent. Trying out alternative means of energy such
as nuclear and renewables while working on energy efficiency, China has tried to
reduce its energy security risks since a while. Nevertheless, China is heavily
dependent on imported energy supplies and is a major trade partner of most of
the oil and gas producing nations in the Middle East. Even as China’s energy
imports surge, the domestic demand for energy also grows in Middle Eastern
countries. Considering other options, China tried to diversify its sources of
oil supply since 2015 but remains one of the top three importers from Saudi
Arabia, Iraq and Iran. Thus, helping maintain peace and prosperity in the Middle
East is China’s top-most priority.
China is heavily dependent on imported energy supplies and is a major trade
partner of most of oil and gas producing nations in the Middle East
Investor in the Arab world
Consequently, China increased its investments in infrastructure and construction
projects such as ports, pipelines and roads worth $29.5 billion, becoming the
largest investor in the Arab world since 2016.
Creating new industries not only extended China’s economic interests beyond
energy trade in the region, it also helped diversify the economies of the Arab
world. During Saudi King Salman’s visit to Beijing in March 2017, commercial
agreements totaling $65 billion were inked in renewable energy, oil and space
sectors.
Planning a new Suez Canal, Egypt-China cooperation is also underway while a
Sino-Oman Industrial City worth $10.7 billion has been built in Duqm, Oman, with
Chinese investment.
Planning development in line with the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), both
Jordan and Saudi Arabia are also engaged in consultations with China over
various prospects.
Enhancing commercial engagement, an Arab Summit of 21 nations was recently
arranged for foreign ministers in Beijing. Launching an “oil and gas plus” model
to speed up economic growth in the region, President Xi pledged $20 billion in
loans as well as $106 billion in financial aid to nations in the Middle East.
On the occasion, Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Adil al-Jubeir said: “Beijing is
a political, economic and security partner. The crises and challenges that China
and the Arab world have experienced are identical, both the Arabs and the
Chinese aspire to strengthen and intensify their co-operation in all fields.”
Elevating ties to a “strategic partnership”, Xi has also visited the Arab region
recently on his first foreign trip abroad since his re-election this March.
Providing strong trade routes according to the vision of BRI, countries of the
Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) can avail of the BRI as a bridge to market their
commodities.
Cooperation forum
Policy coordination mechanisms such as the China-Arab Cooperation Forum and the
Strategic Dialogue between China and the GCC states have been formulated to
speed up the engagement.
According to Beijing, “any type of bilateral cooperation (with China) can be
considered part of the Belt and Road”, a “1+2+3’ cooperation pattern was adopted
under the Arab Policy Paper published in 2016 which specified collaborations in
energy, construction, industry, renewable energy and trade as well as innovative
fields of space and nuclear energy.
Presenting a slew of possibilities for the entire region, an international
financial exchange would cater to BRI trade. A pioneer in “green development”,
China plans green pilot zones along the BRI with the requirement that all
participants comply with Chinese standards.
Negotiating for a “free trade” agreement between China and the Arab nations,
Beijing also plans to grant special trading privileges along with financing
facilities. Thus, the economic relationship between China and the Middle East is
on an upward trajectory as it expands beyond oil. Finally, the demand for
artificial intelligence, fintech, automated cars and renewable energy is growing
in the Middle East. Leading in all these fields, China is the best option in all
these sectors of development while it also provides financing.
In fact, a new financial consortium would be created with a $3 billion fund for
an “industrial revival”. In the long run, trade expansion would strengthen
relations between Arab countries and the rest of the world.
When the Brotherhood’s ‘bankrupt’ speaks!
Jameel al-Thiyabi/Al Arabiya/August 29/18
Yusuf al-Qaradawi has no achievement of note to brag about despite his old age.
His career in politicizing religion is filled with what’s shameful and with
atrocities as well as with creating crises and deceiving the credulous with his
fatwas (religious edicts).
This year’s Hajj (1439H) provided an opportunity for exposing more of the
contradictions of Qaradawi, who considers himself the godfather of the Muslim
Brotherhood whose schemes, proposals, lies and truth as a terror group has been
exposed.
The ‘mufti of terror’
The mufti and preacher of terrorism “offensively” tweeted against Qatar’s
pilgrims, claiming that God does not want their Hajj! Is he being rude to God,
or did he make this statement because he is an agent and follower of the two-Hamad
regime? Or is this a result of decrepitude which he, Qatar and the Brotherhood
suffer from? Qaradawi’s tweet is a clear example that this destructive
organization is bankrupt. Qaradawi has exposed himself and the Muslim
Brotherhood and revealed the extent of his ignorance and fake ideas.
When it comes to Qaradawi, this is not surprising. He has satiated the world
with his shameful fatwas that have claimed that “jihad” is necessary against all
Arab and Islamic regimes and that permitted suicide bombings. This is in
addition to his stances in support of the terrorist Lebanese Hezbollah which has
been established, funded and armed by Iran which the two-Hamad regime describes
as “honorable”.
It has been proven by facts, figures, records and photos that Qatari pilgrims
were well received and welcomed. It’s clear that Qaradawi said what he said
because he lives in Doha at the expense of the regime and because he wants to
satisfy the latter via his heresies which no longer have any effect now that his
ill intentions and conspiracies have been exposed.
If only he were consistent and a man of principle. He seems to make a
contradictory statement on an almost daily basis. He praises Gaddafi and then
calls for killing him off. He praises the slaughterer Bashar al-Assad and then
joins the “chorus” of supporting Al-Nusra Front which branched from the
Brotherhood to topple Assad’s regime. Instead of being an advisor to his two
losing Hamad masters and urging them to stop politicizing Hajj and deal with it
like it must be dealt with as the fifth pillar of Islam, he supported their
unjustifiable actions in such a despicable manner that does not sit with his
claim of heading an organization that falsely states it has a peaceful role.
Stopping Qataris from Hajj
Undoubtedly, Qaradawi is a liar and deceiver. He has, before anyone else, tried
with his offensive tweet to give religious justification for the policies of the
Doha regime which continued to close the door on its citizens who desire to
perform Hajj. It would have been appropriate if he had advised the Qatari regime
not to politicize Hajj and to allow the Qataris who wish to perform it to go to
Saudi Arabia instead of tracking down Hajj registration websites and shutting
them down and intimidating the Qataris from traveling for Hajj.
However, there are people who find foolishness virtuous to achieve the purpose
of turning back the clock. When they cannot accomplish this aim – which they
know is impossible – they resort to an evil rhetoric and plan campaigns to
promote “exposed” lies.
Saudi Arabia facilitated and provided all possible amenities to Qataris in
performing their Hajj. However, these efforts were met by stubbornness and lies
from the two-Hamad regime. This Qatari approach that has been used to arouse a
dislike in a pillar of Islam and to mitigate the popular Qatari discontent
because of preventing them from performing Hajj will not prove effective in
hiding the seriousness of the crime which the Qatari authorities committed when
they prevented people from performing Hajj!
A characteristic of the Muslim Brotherhood’s guides and preachers is allowing
themselves what’s prohibited – they prohibit to people what God Almighty has
permitted. There is no need to say that Qaradawi’s tweet indicates a deviation
from religious thought. He has twisted religious texts to satisfy his Hamad
masters. In the end, however, his talk is nothing more than utter nonsense.
It has been proven by facts, figures, records and photos that Qatari pilgrims
were well received and welcomed. It’s clear that Qaradawi said what he said
because he lives in Doha at the expense of the regime and because he wants to
satisfy the latter via his heresies which no longer have any effect now that his
ill intentions and conspiracies have been exposed.
It is certain Qaradawi is only the sheikh of terrorists and the Brotherhood’s
guide to delusions, destruction, conspiracy and destruction. What he said
reveals the grudge he has had towards Saudi Arabia and towards the annual
pilgrimage during which Muslim hearts reconcile and Muslims stand reassured in
the worship of God ignoring people like him who lead to destruction.