LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS
BULLETIN
March 02/17
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The
Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias/english.march02.17.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily
English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2016
Bible Quotations For Today
You are the salt of the earth; but if salt has lost its
taste, how can its saltiness be restored
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 05/13-17/:'‘You are the
salt of the earth; but if salt has lost its taste, how can its saltiness be
restored? It is no longer good for anything, but is thrown out and trampled
under foot. ‘You are the light of the world. A city built on a hill cannot be
hidden. No one after lighting a lamp puts it under the bushel basket, but on the
lampstand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your
light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory
to your Father in heaven. ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or
the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfil.
Strive side by side with one mind for the faith of the
gospel, and do not be intimidated by your opponents.
Letter to the Philippians 01/21-30/:"For to me, living is Christ and dying is
gain. If I am to live in the flesh, that means fruitful labour for me; and I do
not know which I prefer. I am hard pressed between the two: my desire is to
depart and be with Christ, for that is far better; but to remain in the flesh is
more necessary for you. Since I am convinced of this, I know that I will remain
and continue with all of you for your progress and joy in faith, so that I may
share abundantly in your boasting in Christ Jesus when I come to you again.
Only, live your life in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ, so that,
whether I come and see you or am absent and hear about you, I will know that you
are standing firm in one spirit, striving side by side with one mind for the
faith of the gospel, and are in no way intimidated by your opponents. For them
this is evidence of their destruction, but of your salvation. And this is God’s
doing. For he has graciously granted you the privilege not only of believing in
Christ, but of suffering for him as well since you are having the same struggle
that you saw I had and now hear that I still have."
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources
published english On March 01-02.17
New election law vital for true
representation, Aoun warns/Hussein Dakroub/The Daily Star/February 01/17
SIS attacks on Sinai Christians pose challenge to Sisi/Ben Lynfield/Jerusalem
Post/March 01/2017
To Kurdistan and Back: Iran's Forgotten Front/David Pollock/The Washington
Institute/March 01/17
The Enemies Of Donald Trump Are The Enemies Of America/By Dave Merrick /Canada
Free Press/March 01/17
Concessions Did not Save Geneva/Abdulrahman Al-Rashed//Asharq Al Awsat/March
01/17
Bab al-Mandab Shipping Chokepoint Under Threat/Cmdr. Jeremy Vaughan, USN and
Simon Henderson/The Washington Institute/March 01/2017
The Search for Syria/Ghassan Charbel/Asharq Al Awsat/March 01/17
Iraq and Syria, post ISIS/Sawsan Al Shaer/Al Arabiya/March 01/17
Toward the rising sun/Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/March 01/17
The giant wakes up: Saudi Capital Market embraces new reforms/Dr. Mohamed A.
Ramady/Al Arabiya/March 01/17
Trump and the Russians/Hussein Shobokshi/Al Arabiya/March 01/17
Political Operatives Pose as Journalists, Human Rights Groups/Bassam Tawil/Gatestone
Institute/March 1, 2017
Saudis Optimistic On Trump Administration's Middle East Policy, Express Hope It
Will Act Against Iran/MEMRI/March 01/17
Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published
On March 01-02.17
"Trump's goal is to enlarge the support base to the next US national security
policies"
Hariri Says Govt. a 'Failure' if It Doesn't Pass Electoral Law, Stresses
Mustaqbal 'Wants Elections'
Berri: No to Extension, No to 1960 Law, No to Vacuum
Mashnouq Denies Report on Hariri Swap Plan for Premiership
Jumblat Says Electoral Law Must 'Bolster Partnership', Not 'Create Tensions'
Cabinet Meets after Botched Session as FPM's Energy Minister Hits Out at LF
Israel Returns Ethiopian Woman who Crossed into Shebaa Farms
UNICEF, UNRWA Denounce Child Rights Violations and Injuries Resulting from Camp
Clashes
Aoun Meets World Bank Official
Israel Removes Spy Cam Planted on Lebanon Border
Cautious Calm in Ain el-Hilweh, Sidon on Strike Denouncing Fights
Raad Says Tax Hike in Return for Wage Scale Approval Useless
New election law vital for true representation, Aoun warns
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published On March 01-02.17
Cairo Symposium Promotes Muslim-Christian
Coexistence
Up to 15,000 IS Fighters Remain in Iraq and Syria, Says U.S. General
Trump Promises 'Renewal of the American Spirit'
US Probing Whether Al-Qaida Number Two Killed in Syria
Sisi defends anti-ISIS fight after Copts flee Sinai
UN: 8,000 flee as Iraqi forces fight ISIS in western Mosul
ISIS leader Al-Baghdadi acknowledges defeat in Iraq
Nasr al-Hariri: Russia pressuring Assad to discuss political transition
UN panel: Evacuation of Syria’s Aleppo was a war crime
Iraqi army controls main roads out of Mosul, trapping ISIS
Pervez Musharraf: I see Donald Trump as an agent of change
France's Fillon Faces Charges but Stays in Campaign
Links From Jihad Watch Site for March 01-02.17
Germany: Neo-Nazi converts to Islam, plots jihad massacre of police and soldiers
Denver: Muslim who killed security guard says “I did that purely and solely for
the pleasure of Allah”
Buffalo: Catholic bishop, whose organization gets millions for refugee
resettlement, decries “animosity” toward refugees
Establishment media ignores key facts in trying to discredit Muslim Brotherhood
document vowing to destroy US from within
Catholic scholar of Islam: “The average Muslim sees Islam as a religion of
peace”
Iraqi officers find Islamic State jihadis hidden among the refugees fleeing
Mosul
The Islamic State calls on Muslims to dress like Jews to terrorize and murder
them
Trump refuses to back down on jihad fight; Politico has egg on its face
Trump: “We are also taking strong measures to protect our nation from radical
Islamic terrorism”
Head of Swedish ambulance drivers union: No-go zones are reality for us
Links From Christian Today Site
for March 01-02.17
Don't Knock Homeless Who Drink A Glass Of Wine – It's Their Only Pleasure, Says
Pope Francis
#AshesToGo At Start Of Lent As Clergy Offer Commuters 'Ash n' Dash'
Cambridge College Named After Wartime Leader Forced To Remove Holocaust Denier's
Churchill Biography
Fresh Battle Over Abortion Decriminalisation Looms In Parliament
US Muslims Must Have Same Religious Freedoms As Christians, Say Evangelical
Leaders
Bishop Opposed To Women Priests Warned Of 'Anxiety And Distress' Over His
Promotion To Sheffield
The Things These Celebrities Are Giving Up – Or Not – For Lent
Poll Shows Huge Gap Between Number Of Americans Claiming To Be Christian And
Number Living Biblically
Bishop Angaelos: Christians In Egypt Told To 'Leave Or Die', 40 Killed In 3
Months, Prays For ISIS
Theresa May: We Must Stand Up For Persecuted Christians
How Should Christians Respond To Donald Trump? Obama's Faith Advisor Sees A
Fresh Opportunity
Latest Lebanese Related News published
On March 01-02.17
"Trump's goal
is to enlarge the support base to the next US national security policies"
Walid Phares/Mideast Newswire/March 01/17/In his comments on President Donald
Trump's state of the Union address in Congress, at an interview on Skynews
Arabiya, Dr Walid Phares said "one of the goals of such a speech is to widen the
support from the partisan base to a wider national constituency, ahead of the
projected changes in US national security and foreign policies. By presenting
the issues as based on US popular consensus, President Trump will be shrinking
the arguments against the Administration's platform."
Hariri Says Govt. a 'Failure'
if It Doesn't Pass Electoral Law, Stresses Mustaqbal 'Wants Elections'
Naharnet/March 01/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri announced Wednesday that his
government would be a “failure” if it does not manage to pass a new electoral
law as he denied media reports claiming that his al-Mustaqbal Movement is
seeking to postpone the elections. “Several formats are being discussed very
positively by all parties, and also with (Druze leader MP) Walid Beik (Jumblat).
We want an electoral law and we want the elections to be held soon,” Hariri told
reporters after talks with Jumblat at the Grand Serail. “I will frankly say it,
as a prime minister I consider that should we fail to approve an electoral law,
this government will be a failure. This issue is extremely important and all
parties in the government are of this opinion,” Hariri added. Asked how much
progress has been made towards approving a new electoral law, Hariri said “70
percent. Commenting on media reports claiming that Mustaqbal is seeking to
postpone the parliamentary elections in a bid to strengthen its internal
situations, Hariri said he does not “have a problem” if the elections are held “tomorrow.”“Let
no one think that al-Mustaqbal Movement is weak. It is a strong movement that
has a presence across Lebanon. We might have been affected in some regions but
this does not mean that we have weakened,” Hariri added. The country has not
organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has since
extended its own mandate twice. While Hariri's Mustaqbal has rejected that the
electoral law be fully based on the proportional representation system, arguing
that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's
strongholds, Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation warning
that it would “marginalize” his minority Druze community. After Wednesday's
talks with Hariri, Jumblat however announced that he would accept a so-called
hybrid law that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all
system.
Berri: No to Extension, No to 1960 Law, No to Vacuum
Naharnet/March 01/17/Speaker Nabih Berri on Wednesday stressed his rejection of
three possibilities: extending the parliament's term, holding polls under the
1960 law, or plunging the country into parliamentary vacuum. “No to extension,
no the 1960 law and no to vacuum,” MPs quoted Berri as saying during his weekly
meeting with lawmakers in Ain el-Tineh. “It is required to exert efforts to pass
a new law as soon as possible or else we would enter a dangerous phase with the
beginning of April,” Berri warned. He reiterated that “the government should
discuss and approve this law and refer it to parliament,” noting that the
electoral law is the government's “top mission.” The speaker also noted that
“the national interest requires reaching an electoral law containing
proportional representation.”“Under such a law, we would be getting rid of
sectarianism while preserving the sects,” Berri pointed out. The country has not
organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature has since
extended its own mandate twice. While al-Mustaqbal Movement has rejected that
the electoral law be fully based on proportional representation, arguing that
Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's strongholds,
Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected proportional representation,
even within a hybrid law, warning that it would “marginalize” the minority Druze
community. The political parties are meanwhile discussing several formats of a
so-called hybrid law that mixes proportional representation with the
winner-takes-all system.
Mashnouq Denies Report on Hariri Swap Plan for Premiership
Naharnet/March 01/17/Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq denied on Wednesday
media reports claiming that PM Saad Hariri made a deal with President Michel
Aoun and Hizbullah that guarantees his endorsement as PM after the parliamentary
polls. Mashnouq said the report claimed the alleged swap would see Hariri accept
holding the parliamentary elections under a proportional representation system
(agreed by Hizbullah and Aoun) in return for the country's premiership after the
polls “The report is inaccurate, not serious and worthless to reply to” said
Mashnouq in a tweet. “Hariri has his own position because of his parliamentary
bloc and the magnitude of his political representation,” added the Minister.
Al-Akhbar daily reported on Wednesday that Hariri is seeking Lebanon's
premiership after the parliamentary polls are staged during the summer. It said
the PM would accept in return, Hizbullah's proposal to stage the elections under
a proportional representation system seeing Lebanon as one district. Political
parties are bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats
among the different religious sects. Al-Mustaqbal Movement of Hariri has
rejected that the electoral law be fully based on proportional representation,
arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition in the party's
strongholds. Meanwhile, Druze leader MP Walid Jumblat has totally rejected
proportional representation, even within a hybrid law, warning that it would
“marginalize” the minority Druze community.
The country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the
legislature has instead twice extended its own mandate. The last polls were held
under an amended version of the 1960 electoral law and the next vote is
scheduled for May.
Jumblat Says Electoral Law Must 'Bolster Partnership', Not 'Create Tensions'
Naharnet/March 01/17/Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat
stressed Wednesday that any new electoral law should “bolster partnership,
reconciliation and openness.”“We discussed several issues and the most important
thing is to overcome this dilemma and reach an electoral law that bolsters
partnership, reconciliation and openness and does not create tensions, and this
is everyone's inclination,” said Jumblat after talks with Prime Minister Saad
Hariri at the Grand Serail. “In Mount Lebanon, the issue is not about the number
of MPs for the Democratic Gathering... The issue is to emphasize on this
partnership with the Lebanese Forces, Free Patriotic Movement, Kataeb Party,
Hizbullah, AMAL Movement, Jamaa Islamiya and everyone,” added Jumblat. Asked
whether he might accept an electoral law fully based on the proportional
representation system, Jumblat said his recent call for “an amended version of
the 1960 law” was an indication that he would accept a so-called “hybrid” law
that mixes proportional representation with the winner-takes-all system. The
country has not organized parliamentary elections since 2009 and the legislature
has since extended its own mandate twice. While Hariri's al-Mustaqbal Movement
has rejected that the electoral law be fully based on proportional
representation, arguing that Hizbullah's arms would prevent serious competition
in the party's strongholds, Jumblat had totally rejected proportional
representation -- even within a hybrid law -- warning that it would
“marginalize” his minority Druze community.
Cabinet Meets after Botched Session as FPM's Energy
Minister Hits Out at LF
Naharnet/March 01/17/The Cabinet convened Wednesday at the Grand Serail to
continue its discussion of the draft state budget as Energy Minister Cesar Abi
Khalil of the Free Patriotic Movement hit out at the Lebanese Forces over its
latest proposal for the electricity sector. The Cabinet had failed to convene on
Monday due to a lack of quorum caused by the absence of 11 out of 30
ministers.Describing the absence of the ministers as a “coincidence,” Social
Affairs Minister Pierre Bou Assi said there are “positive intentions” towards
approving the budget and the stalled new wage scale. “There is no need for rush
in approving the state budget, because it requires elaborate discussions,” the
minister added. Industry Minister Hussein al-Hajj Hassan of Hizbullah meanwhile
reiterated his party's rejection of any new taxes on low-income citizens. “We
are convinced of the budget's taxing measures and we have dropped the taxes that
harm the people,” Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil said after the session.
Information Minister Melhem Riachi announced that discussions have reached
Article 82 of the 90-article draft state budget and that he expects the Cabinet
to finish its deliberations on Friday, describing the atmosphere as positive.
As for the issue of privatizing the electricity sector, Education Minister
Marwan Hamadeh of the Progressive Socialist Party voiced support for the LF's
proposal in this regard, as pro-president Justice Minister Salim Jreissati said
the state budget and the electricity plan are “two separate things.”
Energy Minister Abi Khalil meanwhile told reporters sarcastically that he is
“preparing a health plan,” in an apparent jab at the LF, which holds the health
portfolio in the government. Flanked by Abi Khalil after the session, Health
Minister Ghassan Hasbani said: "We're both in good health and we always
cooperate."LF leader Samir Geagea has recently proposed that private companies
build and operate power plants in a partnership with the state in the
electricity sector, describing it as a necessary reform that should be included
in the state budget.
According to Geagea, such a step would provide a 24/24 power supply across the
country and would spare the treasury around $2 billion in yearly losses.
FPM chief and Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil said such a plan would require five
years of preparations.
Israel Returns Ethiopian Woman who Crossed into Shebaa
Farms
Naharnet/March 01/17/The Israeli army on Wednesday arrested an Ethiopian
domestic worker during her attempt to cross the border into the occupied Shebaa
Farms, Lebanon's National News Agency reported. “She was returned to the
Lebanese side via the Berket al-Naqqar area west of Shebaa after which she was
arrested by the Lebanese army for interrogation,” NNA added. Tensions have been
high along the Lebanese-Israeli border in recent days. On Saturday, Israel's
army fired tear gas to disperse dozens of Lebanese demonstrators after they
crossed the border protesting against the installation of spying equipment in
their village, Mays al-Jabal. Lebanon is still officially at war with Israel,
and around 1,000 U.N. peacekeepers are deployed in the country's south.
UNICEF, UNRWA Denounce Child Rights Violations and Injuries
Resulting from Camp Clashes
Naharnet/March 01/17/UNRWA and UNICEF strongly condemned the armed violence in
Ain el-Hilweh Palestine refugee camp in Sidon, southern Lebanon, which directly
affects the safety and security of civilians, including children, a statement
said on Wednesday. “We deplore reports that at least eight civilians, including
a thirteen year old boy and a United Nations (UNRWA) staff member, have been
injured over the past days. We are deeply concerned that ongoing violence will
result in further civilian casualties, including children,” the statement read.
“As a result of the violence, most of the education, health and other services
in the camp have been suspended. In addition, three United Nations schools have
also been entered and used by armed actors in breach of the inviolability of UN
premises and in violation of children's rights under international law.” “UNICEF
and UNRWA denounce the violence which again has restricted access to schools and
continues to deprive children, including some 5,200 UNRWA students, from
enjoying their right to education. Further, civilians residing in the camp have
limited access to critical health care. UNICEF and UNRWA call on all those
involved to respect the sanctity of human life and to ensure the protection of
Palestine refugees and other residents of the camp. We call on all armed actors
operating in the camp to cease hostilities and take necessary measures to
protect civilians and ensure safe access to schools, clinics and other vital
services."
Aoun Meets World Bank Official
Naharnet/February 01/17/President
Michel Aoun held talks on Wednesday with World Bank Director for the Middle East
Ferid Belhaj where discussions focused on Lebanon's infrastructure improvement,
and cooperation to provide the needed funding for reforms, the National News
Agency reported.
After the meeting Belhaj said: “We discussed with the President Lebanon's
concerns in the financial sector, the development of infrastructure and
cooperation to secure the necessary funding and reforms in administrations and
projects of interest to Lebanon.”“Lebanon has top priority in the financing of
projects, especially after the regularity of the work of constitutional
institutions,” added Belhaj. The official also stressed “the World Bank is
interested in the reforms introduced in Lebanon's 2017 state budget in
accordance with the recommendations of Lebanon's Finance and Budget
committee."In February, the World Bank signaled a resumption of international
aid months after the election of a president following two and a half years of
political vacuum in the country. It earmarked $200 million for repairing
Lebanon's unsafe roads. Hundreds of millions of dollars in assistance money from
the World Bank was held up as Lebanon's long-feuding parties failed to agree on
a president for more than two years. In October, the parliament was finally able
to elect Free Patriotic Movement founder Michel Aoun as president.
Israel Removes Spy Cam Planted on Lebanon Border
Naharnet/February 01/17/Israeli forces removed on Wednesday a spy device they
planted earlier in an area in the southern neighborhood of Kroum al-Sharqi, the
National News Agency reported on Wednesday. An Israeli infantry patrol
approached the location and removed the device amid heavy military presence in
the region, NNA said. Last week, Israeli forces crossed the electronic fence in
the outskirts of the southern border town of Mays al-Jabal in Kroum al-Sharqi
and planted solar powered spy camera and a transmission instrument. The
development comes amid high tensions between Israel and Hizbullah that follow an
exchange of threats and amid unconfirmed reports of Israeli airstrikes on
Hizbullah posts inside Syria.
Cautious Calm in Ain el-Hilweh, Sidon on Strike Denouncing Fights
Naharnet/February 01/17/Cautious calm prevailed Wednesday night in the
densely-packed Palestinian refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh, after one week of
deadly clashes between the Fatah Movement and Islamist groups that left one
civilian dead and six others injured. The ceasefire agreement, reached at around
7 pm on Tuesday, still stands except for a personal dispute that erupted after
midnight in al-Tahtani street leaving one person injured, the National News
Agency reported on Wednesday. Meanwhile, the southern port city of Sidon
observed a general strike upon the request of MP Bahia Hariri, denouncing the
inter-Palestinian fighting and the blood shed in the camp. Schools, social and
economic institutions were closed for the day. The fighting in Ain el-Hilweh
near Sidon has pitted members of Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah
movement against hardline Islamist groups. Even as factions declared a ceasefire
from the Palestinian embassy in Beirut, plumes of smoke could be seen rising
from the camp on Tuesday, AFP's correspondent said. Intermittent fighting broke
out on Thursday after Fatah pulled out of a joint committee that maintained
security in Ain el-Hilweh, but the violence later intensified, AFP's
correspondent said. Palestinian factions meeting at their embassy in Beirut on
Tuesday announced that they had agreed on a ceasefire to end the fighting.
According to Lebanon's National News Agency, the groups said they would
re-establish the joint security apparatus. By long-standing convention,
Lebanon's army does not enter Palestinian refugee camps, where security is
managed by joint committees of Palestinian factions. In recent years, tensions
have risen between Fatah and the Jund al-Sham Islamist group in the camp. The
UN's Palestinian refugee agency said on Tuesday it had halted all services in
the camp for the second day because of the unrest. Ain al-Hilweh is an
impoverished, overcrowded camp near the coastal city of Sidon, and is home to
some 61,000 Palestinians, including 6,000 who have fled the war in Syria.
Raad Says Tax Hike in Return for Wage Scale Approval
Useless
Naharnet/February 01/17/Hizbullah Loyalty to the Resistance bloc Mohammad Raad
stated that government’s approval of the wage scale is an essential matter, but
decried imposing taxes in return which he said would diminish the purchasing
power, the state-run National News Agency reported on Wednesday. “The pressing
issue of the wage scale affects a large segment of our people and our brothers
awaiting an increase in their salaries, it is rightfully theirs,” said Raad.
“However if you (the government) plan to approve the scale and at the same time
impose an increase in taxes, it would take away the gains mainly from the
salaries,” said Raad, stressing that the bloc has rejected a tax hike targeting
low-income earners. Raad urged the government to “change the approach of budget
preparation, and to inspect the sources of squandering and corruption in the
country,” instead. The cabinet has been meeting lately to approve Lebanon's
state budget plan after a 12-year delay. The cabinet will meet on Wednesday and
Friday. Due to political wrangling between the rival political parties, Lebanon
has not approved a budget since 2005.
New election law vital for true representation, Aoun warns
Hussein Dakroub/The Daily
Star/February 01/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=52873
The Daily StarBEIRUT: With no signs yet of any breakthrough in intensive efforts
to agree on an electoral law, President Michel Aoun said Tuesday a new voting
system to replace the disputed 1960 majoritarian formula is crucial to achieving
true representation in Parliament. He also reaffirmed his support for a vote law
based on proportional representation, saying such a law was essential for the
country’s political stability. “An agreement on an electoral law is currently
our main preoccupation because without it, we will not be able to change the
image of representation which we want,” Aoun said during meetings with visitors
at Baabda Palace.
“This change cannot be achieved without proportional representation because if
we are seeking to attain political stability, all the Lebanese must be
represented in Parliament, both the minority and majority regardless of the
sects and their sizes,” he said, according to a statement released by the
president’s media office.
“My dream is to achieve stability, security and prosperity for our country. I am
reassured about Lebanon as long as I am steering the ship,” Aoun added.
Aoun’s remarks come as rival factions remain at opposite poles over what voting
system to adopt to govern the upcoming parliamentary elections slated for May
21. They also came on the same day the Free Patriotic Movement’s parliamentary
Change and Reform bloc said it was searching for a new electoral law to replace
the 1960 system.
Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil, the FPM leader, Sunday threatened to revive the
controversial Orthodox Law, which calls for each sect to elect its own
representatives, if its new proposal failed to break the monthslong deadlock
over a new vote system.
Behind-the-scene talks involving the FPM, the Future Movement, the Amal Movement
and Hezbollah are currently being held, focusing on vote proposals that are
essentially based on a hybrid law that blends provisions of the proportional and
winner-take-all systems.
Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea entered the electoral law fray Tuesday by
calling on lawmakers to vote on several draft electoral proposals if no
agreement was reached by rivals on a new voting system.
Speaking to reporters after meeting Aoun at Baabda Palace, Geagea said the
president’s main concern was to reach a new electoral law, adding that the LF
was in agreement with Aoun on rejecting parliamentary elections held under the
1960 formula.
Geagea said he discussed with Aoun the ongoing consultations between the
opposing sides, in addition to the 2017 draft state budget currently being
examined by the Cabinet. “The parliamentary majority agrees on the need to draft
a new vote law. But the problem is in the shape of the law to be adopted,”
Geagea said. He added that if the current consultations lead to an accord on an
electoral law, this would be positive. “But if no agreement is reached, I don’t
see any barrier at all to go to Parliament and vote on two, three or more draft
laws,” the LF chief said. “I don’t see any other solution. It is unacceptable
not to agree [on a vote law], or not to go to Parliament.”
However, Speaker Nabih Berri staunchly opposes putting draft electoral proposals
to a vote in Parliament, arguing that such a move would threaten the country
with civil war in the absence of consensus among rivals.
“This proposal [putting draft electoral laws to a vote] is entirely out of the
question because it will threaten a civil war,” Berri said in remarks published
by newspapers Monday. “Lebanon cannot endure an electoral law not based on
consensus. This [electoral] law is related to the composition of power.
Therefore, the victory of a specific draft law with a majority vote will mean a
defeat for another faction.”
The Future Movement’s parliamentary bloc underlined the importance of reaching a
“consensual” hybrid electoral law.
“The bloc stresses the importance of the political parties reaching a consensual
electoral law based on a hybrid system that [blends provisions of] the
majoritarian and proportional systems and does not eliminate any party,” the
bloc said in a statement after its weekly meeting.
Referring to the Cabinet discussions on the 2017 draft need to endorse the
budget as soon as possible while balancing expenditures and revenues.”
Aoun’s Change and Reform bloc said it was exploring a new vote law after two
hybrid proposals presented by Bassil had been spurned by MP Walid Jumblatt’s
bloc and other parties.
“Regarding an electoral law, we have made initiatives on one proposal after the
other. The proposals were discussed and they said they had collapsed. What
matters is that we are taking an initiative and we will not lose hope of our
proposals,” Justice Minister Salim Jreissati told reporters following the bloc’s
weekly meeting chaired by Bassil.
He said the FPM was seeking a voting system that ensures “true and effective
political representation” under unified criteria. “We will continue taking
initiatives. When the initiatives stop, the head of the bloc and the FPM [Bassil]
will announce the next steps,” Jreissati said.
Meanwhile, Interior Minister Nouhad Machnouk apologized to Prime Minister Saad
Hariri for arriving late to a Cabinet meeting that had been canceled due to a
lack of quorum. Machnouk said in a tweet that he contacted Hariri to express
regret over his late arrival to the Grand Serail Monday.
The Cabinet is scheduled to hold another session Wednesday to resume discussions
on the draft budget.
Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published On March 01-02.17
Cairo Symposium Promotes Muslim-Christian Coexistence
Waleed Abdul Rahman/Asharq Al Awsat/March 01/17/Cairo- Officials, experts and
clerics partaking in the international meeting in Cairo, Egypt on Tuesday
reaffirmed that excommunicating other religions contradicts the principals of
forgiveness promoted by faith and international conventions. Extremism was
conceded to be the greatest threat to coexistence. The head Imam of Al-Azhar,
Sheikh Ahmed El-Tayyeb, called on religious institutions in the East and West to
act against Islamophobia, telling faith leaders at a Cairo conference that Islam
“is not the reason for wars.”“Exonerating religions from terrorism no longer suffices in the face of these
barbaric challenges,” Tayyeb said. Tayyeb called for dispelling “the lingering
mistrust and tensions between religious leaders that are no longer justified,
for if there is no peace between the proponents of religions first, the
proponents cannot give it to the people.”Coptic Christian Pope Tawadros II
called for “fighting extremist thought with enlightened thought.”“Egypt and the
region have suffered from extremist thought resulting from a mistaken
understanding of religion that has led to terrorism,” he said.
The “Freedom and Citizenship” conference is hosted by Al-Azhar, one of the
leading Muslim authorities based in Cairo.Arab League Secretary-General
confirmed that the region is undergoing tragic events as a result of
misinterpreting holy scripture and exploiting the misreading to justify
bloodshed by extremist groups. Extremism has hindered social values of
patriotism and coexistence, he added. The activities of the two-day conference
‘Freedom and Citizenship’ kicked off on Tuesday and are sponsored by Al-Azhar,
Council of Elders of Muslims, and under the auspices of Egyptian President Abdel
Fattah el-Sisi. Representing delegations of over 50 countries are partaking in
the event. The conference, including Muslim muftis and Christian clergy such as
Lebanese Maronite Patriarch Bechara al-Rahi, is to issue a closing statement
today. ISIS, which controls parts of Syria and Iraq, views Christians as enemies
who should either be killed or subjugated. In Egypt, the group’s affiliate
called for war on the Coptic minority after bombing a church in December 2016,
killing 29 people.Tayyeb, who represents a more moderate and traditional form of
Islam, argues that groups like ISIS have perverted the religion.
Muslim, Christian Clerics Say Don't Link Islam to Terrorism
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/March 01/17/Leading Muslim and Christian clerics
in the Middle East issued a statement Wednesday urging against linking Islam to
terrorism, following a conference in Cairo on co-existence. The conference,
hosted by the prestigious Sunni Muslim al-Azhar institute, comes as sectarian
conflict continues to ravage the region and after a spate of jihadist attacks on
Christians in Egypt. It also comes after U.S. president Donald Trump's
administration shifted from the vaguer language of its predecessor by
identifying its fight as against "radical Islamic terrorism."Former president
Barack Obama, who led an international coalition against the Islamic State group
in Iraq and Syria, had argued that calling the jihadists "Islamic" gave them
legitimacy. A closing statement read by Azhar's Sheikh Ahmed Tayeb demanded
Islam not be associated with terrorism. "The conference demands that those who
link Islam and other religions with terrorism immediately stop," he said.
"Judging Islam by the criminal actions of some who associate with it opens the
door to describing all religions as terrorism, which justifies extremist
modernists' argument that societies must be rid of religion," he added. The
two-day conference was attended by Muslim muftis and Christian clergy such as
Lebanese Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi, as well as representatives of U.S.
and British churches. The statement urged fostering understanding and equality
between religions. IS, which controls parts of Syria and Iraq, views Christians
as enemies who should either be killed or subjugated. In Egypt, the group's
affiliate called for war on the Coptic minority after bombing a church in
December, killing 29 people. The jihadists say they base their views on verses
in the Koran and sayings of the prophet Mohamed, which moderates like Tayeb
argue have been taken out of context.
Up to 15,000 IS Fighters Remain in Iraq and Syria, Says
U.S. General
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/March 01/17/Between 12,000 and 15,000 Islamic
State fighters remain in Iraq and Syria, a top U.S. general said Wednesday, an
indication of a significant dwindling of the jihadists' forces. The U.S.
military only provides periodic updates on estimates of IS fighters but in 2015
and 2016, the Pentagon put the number at between 20,000 and 30,000 in the two
countries. Some months saw the jihadists being killed in the thousands, though
initially at least they were able to replenish their ranks through a porous
border with Turkey that now is effectively sealed.
Army Lieutenant General Stephen Townsend told reporters that among the many
fighters killed in recent months are an "extraordinary number" of IS leaders,
including many close to the group's elusive leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. "We
have a specific campaign to hunt them and kill them," Townsend said in a video
call from Baghdad. "Almost all of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi's inner circle has been
killed in the last six months."Still, he said about 2,000 IS fighters remain in
and around western Mosul, defending the last portions of their former Iraqi
bastion. When the Mosul campaign began in October, officials estimated there to
have been 3,000 to 5,000 IS fighters in and around the city. Some of those
fighters have fled west to the Tal Afar region and security forces have
intercepted others who are trying to mingle with the civilian population "all
over Iraq and Syria," Townsend said."We're focused on chasing them out in a sort
of sequential campaign," he added. A U.S.-led coalition has since late summer
2014 been bombing IS in Iraq and Syria while at the same time supporting local
forces doing the fighting on the ground. Townsend cautioned against predicting
when the defeat of IS might come. "I don't expect (IS) to suddenly collapse from
a lack of morale," he said. "There's a portion that will break and run. The rest
of them will fight as ordered or fight to the death."
Trump Promises 'Renewal of the American Spirit'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February
01/17/President Donald Trump pledged a "renewal of the American spirit" Tuesday,
as he tempered his most inflammatory rhetoric while fleshing out his nationalist
agenda during a landmark speech to Congress. Transposing hardline campaign
promises into a presidential key, Trump offered the most restrained and detailed
explanation yet of his America-first world view. He criticized threats against
Jewish community centers and condemned the seemingly racially-motivated killing
of an Indian immigrant, answering calls for him to speak out. And although the
70-year-old president again promised a hard line on illegal immigration, he
couched those policies in economic rather than xenophobic terms, winning
sustained applause from the Republican dominated Congress. "By finally enforcing
our immigration laws, we will raise wages, help the unemployed, save billions
and billions of dollars, and make our communities safer for everyone," he
said.Putting some policy meat on the bones, he proposed introducing an
Australian-style merit-based system to reduce the flow of unskilled workers --
and held out the prospect of a bipartisan compromise with Democrats on
root-and-branch immigration reform.
Trump arrived to deliver his maiden address before a chamber filled with
lawmakers, Supreme Court Justices, ambassadors and generals, facing historically
low approval ratings and embroiled in multiple crises. Hailing what he called a
"new national pride" sweeping the country, he sought to use the pomp of the
occasion and the presidential pulpit to reclaim authority and course correct
after 40 difficult days.Discussing trade, Trump even enlisted the help of
American icon Abraham Lincoln, echoing what the first Republican president
described as "protective policy." "Lincoln was right -- and it is time we heeded
his words," Trump said. "I am not going to let America and its great companies
and workers, be taken advantage of anymore." Looking abroad, Trump softened his
criticism of NATO partners and vowed to work with allies in the Muslim world.
But he offered no apologies for emphasizing a world order centered on the nation
state. "My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United
States of America," he said. "But we know that America is better off, when there
is less conflict -- not more," he said, promising to "find new friends, and to
forge new partnerships, where shared interests align."
- 'Far less dark' -In Trump's longest speech to date as president he remained
largely on message, reading his planned address almost verbatim. Some women
Democratic lawmakers had dressed in white for the occasion, a nod to the
suffragette movement and an echo of the substantial opposition the president's
policies face. But Trump struck a compassionate tone at times, embracing
family-friendly policies like paid parental leave, and even won cautious praise
from Democrats for his attempt at a more optimistic vision for America and his
call for unity. "This was far less dark than the inaugural speech. And he has
made an attempt to reach out," said Democrat John Larson of Connecticut. "But
the devil is in the details." According to a CNN instant poll, 57 percent of
Americans who tuned in saying they had a very positive reaction to the speech.
Pressing his domestic agenda -- and pleasing mainstream Republicans who
reluctantly embraced him -- Trump promised to provide "massive" tax relief for
the American middle class and to repeal his predecessor's landmark Obamacare
health reform."When you get into a job and you do it for a while you become
better at it, and I think he's improving every single day," said House Majority
Leader Kevin McCarthy.
- Balancing act -The billionaire's populist economic message was crucial in his
November victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton -- helping him sway voters in
crucial Rust Belt states Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Now his challenge is
translating that into tangible policy steps and legislative achievements. He
outlined plans for rebuilding America's creaking infrastructure and for
high-stakes tax and healthcare reform. But on all three issues, Trump faces a
difficult balancing act with fellow Republicans, who control both the Senate and
House of Representatives.To succeed, Trump -- the consummate political outsider -- may have to embrace
Washington deal-making. Conservatives are desperate to pull Obamacare out by its
roots, but party pragmatists are wary of dismantling a system that helped some
20 million Americans obtain health insurance. Tensions between the executive
branch and the Republican-led Congress are also simmering over Trump's 2018
budget proposal. Trump wants to hike defense spending by $54 billion, offsetting
with cuts in foreign assistance and other non-military spending. On all these
issues Trump offered little detail about how to meet his promises worsening the
country's nearly $20 trillion national debt. "This plan doesn't add up. A
third-grade math student can see that you're going to blow a huge hole in the
deficit if you do the things the president is talking about," Democratic Senator
Chris Van Hollen told AFP.
US Probing Whether Al-Qaida Number Two Killed in Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 01/17/The American government is
investigating whether Al-Qaeda's number two has been killed in Syria, an
official told AFP Tuesday, amid reports of a US strike in or around Idlib. The
official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that agencies were working
to confirm whether Abu Khayr al-Masri is dead, in what would be a major
counterterrorism coup for Donald Trump early in his presidency. Al-Masri is a
son-in-law of Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden and is believed to be deputy to the
group's current leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. "Certainly if the reports are true it
would be welcome news," said Pentagon spokesman Navy Captain Jeff Davis. Trump
has put tackling so-called "radical Islamic extremism" at the top of his
political agenda. He is currently considering a review of the fight against the
Islamic State group, aiming to intensify the campaign and is poised to revive
efforts to ban travels from certain Muslim-majority countries. The revised
travel ban could come as early as Wednesday, White House officials said.
Egypt-born al-Masri, 59, is one of the most prominent figures in al-Qaida to
have roots in the era before the September 11, 2001 attacks, according to the
Soufan Group, a private security and intelligence consultancy. "It was in al-Masri's
guesthouse in Kabul, Afghanistan, that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed briefed top
al-Qaida leaders about the planning of the September 11, 2001 attacks," the
Soufan Group said. His presence in Syria's northwestern Idlib underscores the
importance that country has gained in al-Qaida's strategy, analysts said. Al-Masri,
also known as Abdullah Muhammad Rajab Abdulrahman, joined Zawahiri in the
Egyptian Islamic Jihad group in the 1980s before they enlisted with Bin Laden in
the 1990s. US intelligence believe al-Masri was involved in the 1998 bombings of
US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. He was detained with several other al-Qaida
figures in 2003 in Iran and held until 2015, when they were traded for the
release of an Iranian diplomat who had been seized by al-Qaida's Yemen branch.
Charles Lister of the Middle East Institute said that if al-Masri's death is
confirmed, would be the "biggest blow to al-Qaida since the killing of Nasir al-Wuhayshi
in Yemen in June 2015." Wuhayshi was the leader of al-Qaida in the Arabian
Peninsula. Lister described al-Masri as "jihadi royalty," as a longstanding
member of al-Qaida's central Shura Council and "one of Ayman al-Zawahiri's
closest long-time confidants." His death would "almost certainly necessitate
some form of response, whether from Syria or elsewhere in the world," he said.
According to Treasury Department sanctions al-Masri was previously responsible
for coordinating al-Qaida's work "with other terrorist organizations."He was
born in the Nile Delta city of Kafr al-Shaykh in November 1957, in the midst of
Gamal Abdel Nasser's rule.
Sisi defends anti-ISIS fight after Copts flee Sinai
By AFP Wednesday, 1 March
2017/Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has defended his country's fight
against the ISIS group, after dozens of Christian families fled the Sinai
Peninsula following a string of jihadist attacks. An ISIS affiliate waging an
insurgency in the Sinai last week released a video calling for attacks on
Egypt's Coptic Christian minority. Dozens of families have left the peninsula
after seven Christians were killed in suspected jihadist attacks, including a
Copt murdered in the north Sinai city of El-Arish whose house was also burned.
“(The attacks aim to) destabilise the fabric of Egypt... to give the impression
that one group isn't protected as it should be,” Sisi said in remarks broadcast
on television late Tuesday. “(The attacks make) people
say that Egyptians are targeted in El-Arish and we are beginning to disunite.
Some accuse the state of not helping them.”
Copts, who make up about 10 percent of Egypt's 90-million population, say they
are sidelined in both the education system and state institutions.
Jihadists and Islamists accuse them of supporting the military overthrow
of Islamist president Mohamed Morsi in 2013, which ushered in a deadly crackdown
on his supporters. The ISIS video last week included an anti-Christian speech by
a militant who later detonated an explosive vest in a Coptic church in Cairo
last December 11, killing 29 people. “You say 'don't abandon the Sinai'. At a
state level, that means the mobilisation of army and police forces,” Sisi said.
He said Egypt was bearing a “huge cost” in battling ISIS, and paid tribute to
army and police “martyrs” killed in north Sinai. The former army chief said
security services were doing their utmost to protect civilians in the region.
“We are like a surgeon who wants to remove the danger without damaging the rest
of the patient,” Sisi said.
UN: 8,000 flee as Iraqi forces fight ISIS in western Mosul
The Associated Press, Baghdad Tuesday, 28 February 2017
Since Iraqi government forces launched the push to take the western half of
Mosul from ISIS last week, about 8,000 people have fled from that part of the
city and surrounding villages, the UN humanitarian aid agency said Tuesday.
The agency, known as OCHA, said it is expanding displacement camps to
cope with the increasing numbers of those fleeing Mosul.
With the support of the US-led coalition, Iraqi forces began the
operation to retake western Mosul on Feb. 19, and have so far captured the
city’s international airport and a sprawling military base next to it as well
some neighborhoods from the southern edge. Iraq declared eastern Mosul “fully
liberated” in January, after three months of fierce fighting. The people fleeing
western Mosul are “often exhausted and dehydrated,” the OCHA statement said,
adding that an estimated 250,000 people could flee the fighting in the coming
days. It also noted “high” trauma casualty rates from western Mosul, with at
least 75 civilians treated near the front lines over the past week and warned
the situation for the estimated 750,000 civilians remaining in western Mosul “is
desperate” as supply lines have been cut off, in particular the highway from
Mosul into neighboring Syria. Citing eyewitness accounts, OCHA said civilians
still in western Mosul are enduing shortages of everything - from food and water
to gas, heating oil and medical supplies. The prices of staples such sugar and
potatoes have gone up. Associated Press footage from
the village of al-Salam southwest of the Mosul airport shows hundreds of
civilians trickling to a gathering point in an open and dusty area, carrying a
few of their possessions in bags. Security forces separate the men from the
women and children before they are taken away in buses and military pickup
trucks. Meanwhile, Iraqi special forces moved into western Mosul’s Shuhada
neighborhood amid fierce clashes with ISIS militants as federal police units
continued clearing up Gawsaq, a neighborhood retaken on Monday from ISIS,
according to special forces and police officers. A mortar round landed in one of
the streets, killing three civilians and wounding a fourth, another police
officer said, as security forces scrambled to try and evacuate civilians to safe
areas. All officials spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized
to talk to reporters. The offensive to capture Mosul
is the biggest military operation in Iraq since American troops left in 2011.
Iraq’s second-largest city has been under ISIS rule for more than two years and
remains the ISIS’s last urban stronghold in Iraq.
ISIS leader Al-Baghdadi acknowledges defeat in Iraq
Staff writer, AlArabiya.net Wednesday, 1 March 2017
ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi issued a statement acknowledging the group’s
defeat in Iraq, as he urged supporters to either hide or flee, Iraqi television
network, Alsumaria, quoted local sources as saying. According to the sources in
the Iraqi governorate of Nineveh, Al-Baghdadi’s statement was titled ‘farewell
speech’ and was distributed among ISIS’ preachers and clerics on Tuesday.
Al-Baghdadi ordered the closure of the ISIS office regulating their
fighters and ordered non-Arab fighters to either return to their countries or
detonate themselves, promising them “72 women in heaven.” Many of ISIS’ leaders
in Iraq has now fled towards the group’s controlled areas in neighboring Syria,
the source added. Iraqi forces backed by international
and US aid have been advancing towards ISIS-occupied areas in Iraq over the past
weeks, where the terrorist organization suffered one defeat after another in
Mosul.
Nasr al-Hariri: Russia pressuring Assad to discuss
political transition
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Wednesday, 1 March 2017/The Head of the
delegation of the Syrian Opposition to Geneva 4, Nasr al-Hariri , stressed at a
news conference after meeting with the UN envoy to Syria, Staffan de Mistura, in
Geneva on Wednesday that the opposition has not been in any direct negotiations
with the Syrian regime. “We have heard from Mr. Stefan that because of the
Russian pressure - which could be a good sign –there is a general acceptance in
addressing the issues raised in the 2254 decision. Obviously, we are interested
in achieving a political transition because it is the only way to accomplish the
other issues in this decision.”He added that the regime’s delegation is
prioritizing other points in order to avoid dealing with the political matters
directly; furthermore, the regime will resort to violence on the fronts to spoil
the talks.
UN panel: Evacuation of Syria’s Aleppo was a war crime
The Associated Press, Geneva Wednesday, 1 March 2017/A UN panel said Wednesday
the evacuation of eastern Aleppo in December, after months of siege and aerial
bombing by Russian and Syrian forces, was one of many war crimes committed by
those fighting for control of Syria’s largest city.
The Commission of Inquiry on Syria unveiled a report looking at violations by
all parties in last year’s battle for Aleppo. It singled out a “particularly
egregious attack” in which Syrian warplanes targeted a humanitarian aid convoy.
The findings come amid an open-ended stretch of talks aimed at resolving
the six-year-long conflict. The capture of Aleppo was a major victory for
President Bashar al-Assad and shifted the military balance in his favor.
The agreement to evacuate rebel-held eastern Aleppo gave civilians no
option to remain at the end of the protracted campaign, in which daily aerial
bombings killed hundreds of people and left all the hospitals in the area out of
service. The commission said the agreement amounted to
“the war crime of forced displacement.”The report looked at violations committed
between July 21, when the rebel-held part of Aleppo was besieged, and Dec. 22,
when Syrian troops and allied forces assumed full control of the city. It drew
on the testimony of 291 eyewitnesses, satellite imagery and an array of material
including medical reports, forensic evidence and information provided by UN
member states. “For months, the Syrian and Russian air forces relentlessly
bombarded eastern Aleppo city as part of a strategy to force surrender,” said
the commission’s chairman, Paulo Pinheiro. “The deliberate targeting of
civilians has resulted in the immense loss of human life, including hundreds of
children.”The commission said it was often difficult to know whether specific
strikes were carried out by Russia or the Syrian government. But it said it had
determined that Syrian warplanes targeted hospitals on at least two occasions,
and deliberately attacked a humanitarian aid convoy on Sept. 19.
“The munitions employed (against the convoy) were particularly
appropriate for attacking unarmored vehicles and individuals,” the report said.
It also found evidence that the Syrian government had used prohibited cluster
munitions.Both sides were guilty of carrying out indiscriminate attacks in
densely populated civilian areas, it said, adding that rebels had launched
imprecise mortar attacks on government-held neighborhoods.
Iraqi army controls main roads out of Mosul, trapping ISIS
Reuters, Baghdad Wednesday, 1 March 2017/US-backed Iraqi army units on Wednesday
took control of the last major road out of western Mosul that had been in ISIS’s
hands, a general and residents there said, trapping the militants in a dwindling
area within the city. The army’s 9th Armored Division was within a kilometer of
Mosul’s “Syria Gate,” the northwestern entrance of the city, a general from the
unit told Reuters by telephone. “We effectively control the road, it is in our
sight,” he said. Mosul residents said they had not been able to travel on the
highway that begins at the “Syria Gate” since Tuesday. The road links Mosul to
Tal Afar, another ISIS stronghold 60 km (40 miles) to the west, and then to the
Syrian border. Iraqi forces captured the eastern side
of Mosul in January after 100 days of fighting and launched their attack on the
districts that lie west of the Tigris river on Feb. 19.
If they defeat ISIS in Mosul, that would crush the Iraq wing of the caliphate
declared by the group’s leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in 2014.The US commander in
Iraq has said he believes US-backed forces will recapture both Mosul and Raqqa,
ISIS’s Syria stronghold in neighboring Syria, within six months.
Pervez Musharraf: I see Donald Trump as an agent of change
In an exclusive interview to Al Arabiya English Musharraf said that the US
President has “come in with a clean slate.” (AFP)
By Ehtesham Shahid/Wednesday, 1 March 2017/I generally
see things optimistically and, whatever his personal qualities, I see him
[Donald Trump] as an agent of change, Former President of Pakistan, General
Pervez Musharraf, has said. In an exclusive interview to Al Arabiya English –
conducted on the sidelines of the South Asia Rising Conference in Dubai on
Sunday – Musharraf said that the US President has “come in with a clean
slate.”“He is quite uninitiated into world disputes, into our region, into
India, Pakistan, Kashmir, Afghanistan, all these are new to him so therefore one
can influence his mind to the right direction,” he said.
War on terror
Musharraf also said that Pakistan’s plate is already full when it comes to
dealing with terror. “We need to look at ourselves and we need to control
terrorism within Pakistan,” he said, adding that a very holistic approach is
needed to tackle this challenge. “In Pakistan terrorism exists in different
forms … and each one of them should be dealt with,” Musharraf said in the
interview. According to him, taking this approach will help the Arab world as
well as the rest of the world. “Basically what Pakistan is facing, others are
also facing”.
Sectarianism
Musharraf said that his views are very clear on the issues of terrorism in the
Muslim world. “Whenever terrorism also has sectarian overtones it becomes very
explosive and dangerous for the Muslim world. This is what needs to be
resolved,” he said.
He added that unfortunately whatever is happening in Yemen and in Iraq, Syria
and other parts of the Middle East, has sectarian overtones. “That needs to be
checked and controlled,” he said. Also read: From politics to media, former
Pakistan President Musharraf makes career change. During the interview,
Musharraf also talked about the political situation in Pakistan, Indo-Pak
disputes and the news related to Pakistan’s General Raheel Sharif becoming the
head of “Muslim NATO”.General Pervez Musharraf was the President of Pakistan
from 2001–2008, and the Chief of Army Staff from 1998–2007. In 1999, President
Musharraf came into power with what TIME Magazine quoted as “the most dangerous
job in the world” and played a critical role in fighting the war on terrorism
during his presidency.
France's Fillon Faces Charges but Stays in Campaign
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/March
01/17/French presidential candidate Francois Fillon announced Wednesday that
judges had summoned him to press charges over an expenses scandal but vowed to
continue his campaign. The 62-year-old conservative former premier was favourite
at the start of the year to win the French presidency after clinching the
nomination for the Republicans party in November. But he has since been hit by a
series of allegations that he paid his wife Penelope and his children hundreds
of thousands of euros over decades for allegedly fake parliamentary jobs. Fillon
said the charges were "entirely calculated to stop me being a candidate for the
presidential election." "I won't give in, I won't surrender and I won't
withdraw," he told a press conference on Wednesday. French prosecutors launched
a full judicial inquiry into the claims last week, increasing pressure on
Fillon's campaign which has been in crisis since allegations first surfaced in
January. Fillon has been defiant throughout, insisting publicly that the facts
would exonerate him and reminding his party that they have few attractive
alternatives to him. He has accused the media of trying to "lynch" him and
believes Socialist President Francois Hollande has encouraged the investigations
to discredit him, which would be illegal. Recent surveys suggest that far-right
leader Marine Le Pen and centrist candidate Emmanuel Macron are the two most
likely to progress from the first round of the election on April 23. Macron is
currently shown as the winner of a run-off vote scheduled for May 7. - Political
assassination -Fillon campaigned as a sleaze-free reformer ready to administer a
"radical" economic overhaul and cut public spending. He postponed a visit to a
key farm show on Wednesday morning and announced the press conference, sending
the rumour mill into overdrive amid speculation he would withdraw. Though
employing a family member is not illegal in France, Fillon has not provided
evidence publicly of Penelope's work beyond her contracts which show various
periods of employment. "From the start, I have not been treated like anyone else
facing the justice system," Fillon said in his statement to reporters, claiming
he was the victim of a "political assassination". "It's not just me they are
killing, but the French presidential election," he said. British-born Penelope,
or Penny as she is known, and two of their five children were paid around
900,000 euros ($950,000) from public funds from Fillon's office budget, the
Canard Enchaine newspaper has reported.
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from
miscellaneous sources published
On March 01-02.17
ISIS attacks on Sinai Christians pose challenge to Sisiهجمات داعش في سيناء على
المسيحيين هي تحدى للرئيس السيسي
Ben Lynfield/Jerusalem Post/March
01/2017
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=52878
Church in Ismailia becomes haven for displaced children.
At the Mary Jirjis Church in Ismailia Egypt, Mervat Jirjis describes how her
family recently fled their home in the northern Sinai town of El Arish after her
husband received a threat to leave immediately or be slaughtered.
“The terrorists told him ‘your blood is permissible for us if you don’t leave.’
This caused me to leave immediately carrying only a bottle of water because they
attack anyone carrying travel bags or furniture. We have heard a lot about cases
of murders and I decided not to wait and see any of my relatives be under such
circumstances,” she said in remarks published Tuesday in al-Masry al-Youm
newspaper.
Jirjis is one of hundreds of Coptic Christians forced to flee their homes in El
Arish due to ISIS attacks. They have become the region’s newest group of
displaced persons.
A woman who gave only her first name, Lamia, told the paper that ISIS “drew
swords on the walls and doors of our homes as a threat and we left everything
behind us.” She said her Muslim neighbors had offered to protect her family but
she declined because she did not want to endanger them.
Egypt's Christians, forced to flee homes in north Sinai due to ISIS, receive aid
at a church
An estimated eighty families have taken shelter in Ismailia, 115 kilometers
northeast of Cairo, where the Mary Jirjis Church provides them with food and
psychological support for their children.
ISIS, which is waging an insurgency against the Egyptian government in Sinai,
has turned to targeting Christian civilians after suffering setbacks in its
confrontation with the army. “It was quite a new out of the box practice of
ISIS. They saw they can’t fight properly the security forces so they decided to
make a u-turn and hurt the civilians, the Copts,” says Mira Tzoreff, an Egypt
specialist at Tel Aviv University’s Dayan Center. “By doing that they undermine
the Sisi regime because from the first day Sisi has tried to rehabilitate
relations between Muslims and Copts.”
Sisi’s efforts included visiting Coptic Pope Tawadros II early in his tenure and
encouraging passage of a law making it easier for the Coptic community to
restore churches. But with the attacks, “suddenly it seems Egypt is not able to
protect its Coptic citizens. This is quite a problem for Sisi,” Tzoreff said.
Heightened problems for Sisi are cause for concern for Israeli policy makers
too, who view him as a crucial regional ally.
ISIS militants have shot and killed seven Christians in separate attacks in El
Arish during February, according to Al Jazeera. In one case, they killed a
Christian plumber at home in front of his family. In another instance, a man was
reportedly killed in front of his pregnant wife.
On February 19, ISIS released a video threatening attacks on Christians as a
follow up to its bombing of St. Mark’s Cathedral in Cairo in December, which
killed 28 people. The video described Christians as “infidels” and enemies of
Islam.
Al-Masry al-Youm described how Mohammed Abdul-Karim, a psychologist who came to
the church to help children, joked with them to put them at ease and promised
them that there would be a magician, balloons, contests and gifts. “The children
don’t know why they were forced to leave their homes [but they know] there is
something wrong and they don’t feel safe,” he said. “The aim of these sessions
is to provide them with serenity and psychological stability.”
Father Arsinius Ayad, who is in charge of the church, said: “We received
children who were traumatized and we have to absorb them and give them the
message they are in their country so they don’t feel alienated. They were
exhausted and they feel pressured after what they’ve seen and this has been
alleviated after officials and concerned people visited them.”
Nadira Samaan, who is volunteering as a cook, added: “I was crying as I offered
food for them, especially the kids. They are so hungry that they race to get the
food.”
Opposition groups in Egypt are criticizing the government’s handling of the
crisis and are saying it should be more active in helping those who fled,
facilitating the exit of those who are still in El Arish and want to leave, and
safeguarding those who must stay in Sinai. Sisi has ordered the Ministry of
Education to transfer displaced students to schools where they have taken refuge
so they can resume their studies.
Tzoreff says it is important for the regime to ensure that the displaced get
housing in Ismailia, Cairo or Alexandria and are able to get into some kind of
routine there because it is impossible to predict whether their displacement
will last months or even years. “The authorities need to do their utmost efforts
to find them alternatives as soon as possible,” she said. “Otherwise the Copts
will turn into an opposition group and Sisi doesn’t need that.”
http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/ISIS-attacks-on-Sinai-Christians-pose-challenge-to-Sisi-482878
To Kurdistan and Back: Iran's
Forgotten Front
David Pollock/The Washington Institute/March 01/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=52882
At a conference in Dahuk in the Kurdistan Region of
Iraq a few weeks ago, I was intrigued to see the leader of the Kurdish
Democratic Party of Iran (KDP-I) -- which the Tehran regime considers a
subversive, terrorist group -- address the assembled notables. Sitting in the
front row were three of the most senior political and security officials of the
Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). The scene made me a bit nervous about
possible Iranian reprisals, so I asked if I could report it. "Certainly," I was
told, "it's already all over the local media."
But sure enough, a few days later, unknown assailants attacked a KDP-I office
inside Iraqi Kurdistan, killing seven people. The attack was all the more
egregious as it took place not near the Iranian border, but in the town of Koy
Sanjaq, right in the middle of the Kurdistan region. No one has been publicly
charged with the killings, nor has the KRG even publicly blamed them on Iranian
agents. The incident chillingly illustrates the nature and reach of Iran's
influence in Iraqi Kurdistan: if you cross us too much, we will kill you.
Beyond such extreme but isolated events, the specter of Iran looms very large
over the much bigger question of Kurdish independence. Iran continues to voice
its firm opposition to this option -- most recently this past week, during a
visit of Kurdistan's Islamic party leaders to Tehran. In a telling contrast, for
at least the past year, KRG president Masoud Barzani has refused a standing
invitation to visit the Iranian capital, reportedly in part because Iran has so
far refused to fly the Kurdish flag in official welcome.
In fact, during my recent visit, a top KRG official privately revealed an acute
insight into how deeply the Iran factor cuts in this context. Kurdistan's
leaders lately aver that they prefer, not unilateral steps toward independence,
but negotiations with Baghdad over new terms of coexistence, confederation, or
separation. But when they say Baghdad, this official told me, they really mean
Tehran. That is because the Kurds see the Iraqi government as essentially
subservient to Iran. Whatever Baghdad may ultimately be willing to grant the
Kurds will reflect Tehran's decision.
On a more mundane level, Iran exercises considerable direct economic leverage in
Kurdistan as well. The region's main economic lifeline, oil, literally runs
through Turkey rather than Iran. Desultory negotiations over a new oil pipeline
to Iran continue, so far to no practical effect. But other trade with Iran,
particularly imports of food staples and other basic consumer goods, is also a
key stabilizing factor in the day-to-day economic life of the Kurdistan region.
Two-way truck trade in oil products remains significant as well. Iran has been
known to close the border, or drastically slow down traffic there, as a form of
political signaling and pressure.
Conversely, Kurdish friends in the local business community tell me that Iran
has offered them free merchandise (otherwise known as bribes) if they agree to
promote or at least turn a blind eye to Tehran's activities in the region. On a
much larger level, Tehran is trying to tempt the KRG with talk of a hypothetical
pipeline from Kurdish oil fields to Iran. At the same time, it threatens the KRG
with talk of a different hypothetical pipeline, this time from Kirkuk directly
to Iran -- but bypassing Kurdish control.
The extent of Iranian influence is particularly evident in Sulaymaniyah
province, which borders Iran and is dominated politically by the Patriotic Union
of Kurdistan (PUK) and its splinter Gorran Party. Both of those parties have
closer historical and personal ties to Tehran than does the rival Kurdistan
Democratic Party (KDP), based in the western provinces of Erbil and Dahuk near
the Turkish border. In 2011, while visiting Sulaymaniyah, I heard a top Gorran
official say that in his province alone, "Iranian agents have 700 safe houses."
Momentarily stunned by this huge number, I asked, "What are they doing in all
those places?!" His laconic answer was instructive: "Well, if I knew the answer
to that question, they wouldn't be safe houses, would they?"
Today, Iran's threatening presence in Sulaymaniyah has, if anything, changed
further for the worse. Just this week, to cite but one example, an outspoken
anti-Iranian member of the Iraqi parliament, Mithal al-Alusi, told the author
that he would not even travel to Sulaymaniyah without a whole convoy of
bodyguards. More broadly, Iran is exploiting these intra-Kurdish divisions in
order to accomplish two related objectives: increase its own influence, through
PUK-affiliated and other factional friends, as far afield as the Turkish border;
and decrease the KRG's ability to present a unified front in negotiating on
behalf of its legitimate interests, whether for eventual independence or merely
for more secure political and economic autonomy.
For U.S. policy, especially now that the Trump administration seems poised to
take a tougher line toward Tehran, this close but tense relationship between
Iraqi Kurdistan and Iran poses an intriguing conundrum. On the one hand, the KRG
seems to offer a prime opportunity, with strong local support, to counter and
perhaps even roll back Iranian regional influence. Doing so could have ripple
effects far beyond the KRG itself, weakening the chain of proxies Tehran has
created from Iran through Iraq and on to Syria, Lebanon, and the Mediterranean
coast. On the other hand, such a forward U.S. policy would probably require a
larger commitment to protect the Kurds from Iranian threats. And it could raise
the issue of Kurdish independence as the next logical step in this sequence,
with all of the complications that might entail.
That is why, as one senior KRG official put it on my recent visit, "In some
short-term sense, it makes life easier for us if the U.S. and Iran are not in a
state of active confrontation." Yet if the United States is indeed now
determined to stand up more strongly against Iran's regional challenges, while
maintaining a crucial ally and buffer against the Islamic State and other
violent extremists, Kurdistan would be an excellent place to start. The first
step should be a simple, firm assurance to the friendly KRG leadership that
Washington will unequivocally back their indigenous efforts to check Iranian
subversion, intimidation, and power projection on Kurdish soil. The second step
should be a clear U.S. offer to keep a substantial military presence inside the
KRG even after victory against the Islamic State -- and even if Baghdad declines
a parallel offer. After that, U.S. partnership with the KRG and others in
pushing back against Iranian encroachments, not just in Kurdistan but around the
region, will become increasingly effective, and decreasingly risky.
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/fikraforum/view/to-kurdistan-and-back-irans-forgotten-front
**David Pollock is the Kaufman Fellow at The Washington Institute, focusing
on regional political dynamics and related issues.
The Enemies Of Donald Trump Are The Enemies Of America
By Dave Merrick /Canada Free Press/March 01/17
After eight years of suffocating under the racist stagnation of B.O. and the
House gavel even in the grip of a witch like Nancy Pelosi, President Trump’s
address to Congress last night was a breath of fresh air.
Immediately after watching ABC’s live monitoring of the event I put aside my
notes, went to YouTube, and watched former president’s Obama’s first address to
Congress after he had taken the helm in 2008. The contrast I saw in his
audience’s reception was breathtaking.
The generous, gracious optimism of the conservative listeners at our first black
president’s pilot congressional address fully illustrated the spirit of a
unified America. The right side of the house was warm and welcoming.
Acknowledging defeat, they very visibly had chosen to walk forward believing the
best of their new president. His words were filled with promise. Eight years
later, sadly, most of the promises he made that night were shown to be part of
an elaborate sales pitch that has left our country in ruin.
Last night, mirroring the attitude of the crazies they represent - and of course
siding with the liberal media that has fully promoted ‘Trump hate’ and the past
eight years of America’s division - the liberal left side of the House of
Representatives made shameful fools of themselves. They carried their
determinedly orchestrated fit into what should have been the kickoff of a
cooperative bipartisan effort toward a stronger America, 2017.
Instead, joining Nancy Pelosi and her fellow white-garbed ‘suffragettes’ in
remaining silent and seated throughout Trump’s speech, America’s liberal
representatives completely put their seal of approval upon the childish behavior
of their snowflake constituency. In the face of the clear speech coming from the
sane and solidly successful new leader of the free world, the left side of the
aisle’s return message was to simply placate and reassure the babies who keep
them employed.
Many of the libs wouldn’t even stand with the ovation for the widow of Navy Seal
Ryan Owens - the man who gave his life in service to our nation. How would their
honoring him have detracted from their Trump hate? And again when Jamile Shaw
Sr. received the condolences for the loss of his son Jamile Jr. - KILLED BY ONE
OF OBAMA’S ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHO HAD BEEN TWICE DEPORTED PRIOR TO THAT
AVOIDABLE MURDER - many of the left would not stand in that Trump-led show of
sorrow and respect.
America would not become a sanctuary for terrorists
When Trump declared that America would not become a sanctuary for terrorists -
again, the left side of the house remained silent. I found a pitiful joke in the
fact that eight years earlier a cocky Barack Obama had announced at the same
ceremony, “I will not allow terrorists to plot against the American people from
safe havens halfway around the world!” And in that speech, eight years ago, both
sides of the House came out of their seats in thunderous approval.
Yet time has shown that not only did he allow that to happen, but we are now
discovering that he and Hillary obviously helped to fund parts of the very core
of that that terroristic effort - ISIS. And, after his opening the doors of our
nation to a gushing throng of un-vetted Islamists, that same group of extremists
is indeed now plotting against us from within the ‘safe haven’ afforded them by
our Constitution - and many now receiving $1700 per month to help keep their
lights on and their bellies filled until they achieve martyrdom here in our own
land.
Nevertheless, our president’s entire speech was devoted to all of America and
all Americans. He very carefully took the time to address issues of concern on
both sides of the line. And the left side of the House couldn’t find the grace
and maturity to, perhaps in a show of good faith, express even a semblance of
solidarity. In so doing they might have shown genuine care for our nation.
While Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore and a host of other American cities are
deteriorating and are desperately in need of all sorts of expensive help, Obama
- DOWN TO HIS LAST MINUTES IN OFFICE - sent billions of our much-needed dollars
to line the pockets of the hooded/masked thugs who have sworn themselves to the
destruction of America and Israel. And those are the chosen priorities of the
pouting people who last night demonstrated their selfish rudeness in the face of
a wounded and divided America.
My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States
of America!”
As I have said so often recently, the liberal media/entertainment industry are
supremely intimidated by our 45th president simply because he does what he says
he’s going to do. For decades television and movies have been blurring reality
and graying the truth. Facts, just like an approaching train, are not
negotiable. And as the Donald begins moving America back toward the course the
framers had originally intended, more and more people are waking up. In his
walking his talk, he is reminding us of the fact that the best things in life
are still available to anyone who determines to pursue and work for that. Last
night’s tantrum from the liberal professional politicians showed the shallowness
and moral bankruptcy of being enslaved to the deceitful 21st-century
Frankenstein of political correctness.
President Donald Trump said this:“My job is not to represent the world. My job
is to represent the United States of America!” President Trump is not
politically correct, and he is scaring the hell out of the people who are.
Unlike the man before him who held the same office, he is not trying to sell us
the lie that the world is our friend. And as he is doing precisely the job he
was hired for: he is turning on all the lights. And the rats are upset and
running scared. We are entering a battle right now in America that is just
beginning to heat up. Last night showed me clearly that the enemies of Donald
Trump are indeed the enemies of America.
**Dave Merrick, Davemerrick.us is an internationally known and published artist
whose works reach into the greatest diversity of audiences. Known primarily for
his astoundingly lifelike portraiture, Merrick’s drawings and paintings grace
the walls of an impressive array of well-known corporate and private clientele.
Many of his published wildlife pieces have become some of America’s most popular
animal imagery.He has more original work in the Pro-Rodeo Hall of Fame than any
other artist. His wildlife and Southwestern-theme work is distributed
internationally through Joan Cawley Galleries of Scottsdale AZ
http://canadafreepress.com/article/the-enemies-of-donald-trump-are-the-enemies-of-america?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=7c18432ba4-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_03_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-7c18432ba4-291119657
Concessions Did not Save Geneva
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed//Asharq Al Awsat/March 01/17
The US government tried to solve the Syria crisis by suggesting three
negotiations based on a balanced political proposal. Yet, the
Damascus-Iran-Russia axis ruined the three conferences. Russia has made up two
conferences, one in Astana and the other currently held in Geneva. The
beginnings confirm the end: a repeated failure.
Although almost everyone cooperated with the Russian project, including Turkey,
Gulf countries, and the Trump administration, this wasn’t enough.
In order to satisfy the Russians, and in cooperation with the UN, providing arms
to the opposition has been suspended. Moderate opposition factions were
pressured to accept solutions that aren’t up to their expectations, while others
were barred from participating in the talks. Washington supported the solution
and UN Envoy Steffan de Mistura defended Russia’s stance. Geneva 4 conference
hasn’t ended yet, but it seems that it is doomed to fail. This reveals that
there is no winning or strong team that can be imposed on everyone through
international support, that which Iran and Russia tried to do by imposing the
collapsing Syrian regime.
Secondly, failure! The suggested solution doesn’t meet the minimum expectations
of millions of displaced, frightened Syrians. The project is based on keeping
the regime in power, which means enforcing its policies of displacement and
cancellation of majority of the remaining residents inside Syria. The idea
itself can’t survive even if all factions signed to it. It is a formula that
aims to enable the regime to rule most of Syria by force, like the West Bank
under Israeli occupation except the fact that Israel has a strong powerful
system which allows it to control this anomaly.
Russia tried to convince a number of opposing factions to join the regime,
offering them positions in the government in exchange. Yet to these factions and
everyone else, this seems like legalizing rape and no one will accept such a
solution.
The previously proposed political solution was rejected by both parties, the
Syrian regime and the opposition. Still, it is the practical solution and
reasonable alternative.
The solution suggests a joint regime and it can now be developed by keeping the
president but giving the security and finance to the opposition or by changing
the president and keeping sovereign posts for the regime but within a framework
of cooperation protected by regional and international authorities.Sharing can
be based on a reasonable balance formula which both parties have an interest in
maintaining: either the presidency or the presidency’s jurisdictions, but not
both. We have a standing model which is the Taif Agreement which ended the
Lebanese crisis, a much more complicated one than the Syrian and based on
creating a solution in which all parties made concessions.
War calls sought to cancel the Christians’ right to presidency and its
jurisdictions demanding it be equally distributed. The dispute ended by
redistributing jurisdictions with the president remaining Christian by losing
some of his jurisdictions for other parties. Hadn’t it been for the Taif
Agreement, the war may have continued and the Christians would have lost their
shares.
If the Sunnis and Shi’ites had refused to make concessions, the war would have
resulted in more foreign interventions that would have prolonged the war and
deepened divisions within sects on the Lebanese arena.
The current political situation in Lebanon is neither perfect nor great, but at
least the country is stable. Syria’s crisis is less complicated, especially that
the civil opposition accepts to share power and a constitution that protects all
minorities. Its system has a good example of that as it involves all Syrians
irrelevant of their religious and ethnic differences. As for the armed Islamic
opposition, most of its factions are rejected by everyone because it has a
religious and internationalist agenda; none of which Syria’s people want. The
failure of Astana and Geneva talks will spur fights again even after denying
armament for moderate opposition, some of which had to form coalitions with
terrorist groups to protect themselves after running out of ammunition.
The repeated failure may lead the uncompromising parties to think reasonably and
rationally. Iran must realize that it will not be allowed to take over Iraq,
Syria and Lebanon. Iran achieved its incursion by benefiting from the weakness
of the former US administration. Its dominance over the major crescent threatens
the rest of the region’s countries and the world. It is a hazard because Iran
uses its agents as a weapon against its rivals, including US and Europeans, or
because unrest will continue, thus attracting more extremists and threatening
everyone.
Bab al-Mandab Shipping Chokepoint Under Threat
Cmdr. Jeremy Vaughan, USN and Simon Henderson/The Washington Institute/March
01/2017
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=52885
Reports of Yemeni rebel mining activity are only the latest in a string of
threats to international vessels transiting the narrow link between the Suez
Canal and the Indian Ocean.
On February 9, the U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence issued an alert warning
commercial vessels about the risk of mines in the Bab al-Mandab Strait: "The
U.S. Government has reason to believe in late January, mines were laid by Houthi
rebels in Yemeni territorial waters in the Red Sea close to the mouth of Mocha
harbor." The alert follows a number of other troubling incidents in the
strategic waterway over the past few months. Saudi and Emirati naval vessels
have been attacked while trying to enforce a blockade on the Iranian-supported
Houthi rebels who control large parts of Yemen. And last October, patrolling
U.S. Navy ships were targeted as well. Diplomatic efforts to end Yemen's civil
war appear to be getting nowhere, and the fighting on land is largely
deadlocked, though forces loyal to the internationally recognized government of
President Abdu Rabu Mansour Hadi recently captured Mocha port near the Bab al-Mandab.
Iran's motives for helping the Houthis are unclear but have the effect of
challenging Saudi Arabia, which views the fighting as a proxy war. More
incidents at sea, especially involving civilian shipping, could further
internationalize the conflict and spur other actors to intervene. In terms of
capability and tradition, the leadership role in any such effort to safeguard
freedom of passage would necessarily be taken by the U.S. Navy.
A KEY CHOKEPOINT
In a 2014 web post describing heavily transited oil chokepoints in the Middle
East and elsewhere, the U.S. Energy Information Administration noted that
blocking such waterways, even temporarily, "can lead to substantial increases in
total energy costs and world energy prices." The Bab al-Mandab, which controls
access to the Red Sea and the southern end of the Suez Canal, is particularly
crucial at present because of Egypt's reliance on imported liquefied natural gas
to maintain its electricity supplies. One LNG tanker destined for Egypt transits
the strait each week. If passage were impeded, those shipments -- and all other
vessels heading to Egypt and the Mediterranean Sea -- would have no alternative
but to make the long voyage around the southern tip of Africa.
The Bab al-Mandab is around ten miles wide at its narrowest point, where the
Yemeni island of Perim protrudes into the waterway toward Eritrea and Djibouti.
Under an international traffic separation scheme, northbound international
shipping uses a two-mile-wide lane on the Arabian side just west of Perim, while
southbound traffic uses a similar lane on the African side. Separated by just
over a mile of water, the two lanes work well for international traffic but are
ignored by smaller local ships and fishing vessels. More than sixty commercial
ships transit the strait every day, and several passenger cruise liners use the
route as well.
THE THREATS
Houthi rebels have attacked warships in or near the strait on at least four
occasions since last fall. On October 1, antishipping cruise missiles fired from
the Houthi-controlled coastline severely damaged the Swift, an Emirati-operated
troop landing and logistics ship. In the following weeks, the destroyer USS
Mason successfully defended itself against three similar attacks. The U.S. Navy
launched a Tomahawk missile strike to knock out coastal radar sites that may
have provided targeting information for the attacks. No further antishipping
missile attacks have been reported since then, but radar sites can be rebuilt,
and the Houthis' stores of such missiles have not been destroyed, so the threat
remains.
Additional threats have emerged in the past few weeks and may already be
affecting international shipping patterns. The recent U.S. government warning
about mines in the Bab al-Mandab advised ships to transit the strait only during
daylight. Moored mines have a notorious tendency to break free of their tethers
and could ramp up the risk to all ships in the area.
Another new threat surfaced when a Saudi frigate was attacked off the Houthi-controlled
port of Hodeida on January 30. Initially thought to be a suicide speedboat, the
attacker is now assumed to have been a remote-controlled drone craft similar to
the type Iranian smugglers employ to pick up contraband from Oman's Musandam
Peninsula in the Strait of Hormuz, a Persian Gulf chokepoint. The UAE also has
such craft (which it uses for target practice), so it is conceivable that the
attack was conducted by a lost Emirati boat recovered by Iran. U.S. warships
transiting the Strait of Hormuz are routinely harassed by small boats from
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN), but weaponized speedboat
drones, known in the military as unmanned surface vehicles (USVs), change the
danger profile into a credible threat. An attacking USV must be disabled at
distance from a warship's hull, a task that could prove exceptionally difficult
during a swarming attack by multiple boats.
Furthermore, Iran's familiarity with explosively formed penetrators (EFPs) means
that such technology may soon be seen at sea. Fortunately, the difficulty in
remotely placing such a narrowly focused explosive against a target's hull
mitigates some of the risk; this could explain why the January 30 attack seemed
to result in such minor damage, assuming an EFP was on board. Even so, an EFP-laden
USV that gets through a ship's defenses could sink it.
RESPONSES
Any future cruise missile attacks on U.S. vessels should be met with additional
strikes on radar control sites and other shore installations. Reconnaissance
assets patrolling Yemen's shorelines, ports, and waterways should be ready and
able to destroy cruise missiles that actively threaten shipping and maritime
forces. Any detected storage sites for mines would also be a worthwhile target.
Meanwhile, the United States should ramp up military training, tactics, and
procedure transfer to the Saudi and Emirati navies, drawing on the U.S. Navy's
long experience defending against small-boat threats. Improved ship and
helicopter weapons systems optimized for medium-range surface engagement would
help the Saudi-led coalition increase their ships' resilience to those threats
as well, though such transfers and related training would take time.
A cooperative minesweeping mission should be considered as well. Such joint
efforts in the area are not new -- in 1984, for example, several ships reported
seeing mines between the Suez Canal and the Bab al-Mandab, prompting an
international mine countermeasures campaign. After much searching, several mines
dating back as far as World War II were found, but British minesweepers also
discovered a newly laid, advanced Soviet mine that was later traced to a Libyan
ferry.
Since 2012, the U.S. and British navies have spearheaded the annual
International Mine Countermeasures Exercise in the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman,
and Red Sea, now the largest such maritime exercise in the world. Thirty nations
from six continents participated in 2016. This year's IMCMEX (whose date remains
undisclosed for now) is an opportunity to send a strong signal about
international commitment to security in the Bab al-Mandab. Now that Mocha harbor
is reportedly back in the Hadi government's hands, clearing mines there could be
a task to incorporate in this year's exercise, but only if the area is truly
secure. Specialized minesweeping ships form part of the American and British
naval contingents in the Persian Gulf and could be deployed to the Bab al-Mandab
quickly.
In addition, several foreign navies are already stationed close to the strait.
Djibouti provides bases for French and American forces as well as Japanese and
Chinese military facilities. Moreover, Saudi Arabia is in talks to establish a
base there, while the UAE has opted for a base at the port of Berbera in the
self-declared Somaliland, notionally part of Somalia. And Israel is widely
believed to have patrol boats based on Eritrean islands just north of the
strait.
CONCLUSION
The United States and its allies must be prepared for more incidents in the Bab
al-Mandab. Contingency planning should include immediate steps to maintain free
passage for commercial shipping, and to ensure that humanitarian aid can reach
Yemen's estimated population of seven million, about a quarter of which
reportedly faces famine. It is difficult to imagine any such intervention or
parallel diplomatic effort succeeding without Washington taking the lead role.
**Cmdr. Jeremy Vaughan, U.S. Navy, is a Federal Executive Fellow at The
Washington Institute who has completed multiple deployments to the Persian Gulf.
Simon Henderson is the Institute's Baker Fellow and director of its Gulf and
Energy Policy Program. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and
do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Navy, U.S. Department
of Defense, or U.S. government.
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/bab-al-mandab-shipping-chokepoint-under-threat
The Search for Syria
Ghassan Charbel/Asharq Al Awsat/March 01/17
Left stranded in the smoke of war, Syrians embark on the ultimate quest of
finding a way back to national peace. They have relentlessly hunted down
solutions for the six-year civil war in faraway lands such as Kazakhstan’s
capital Astana and Switzerland’s Geneva. Syrians did not stop at that, but they
also reached out to regional and international forces for materializing a
balanced solution. Lost in limbo, they toss around accusations like a hot potato
after having had their fill with bullets. Alas feeling that the situation has
truly spiraled out of control.
Going to war is a decision taken by the people, or at least by a select few.
Ending war is a whole other story, especially after having witnessed loss in
tremendousness, unparalleled brutality, and the collapse of establishments
nationwide. Syrians look left and right only to find themselves engulfed in
frustration and despair. They have arrived at a stage beyond the capacity of
containment and resolving powers of the Arab League, a body existing on the sole
principal of looking after the welfare of the Arab world. Restoring peace and
stability to Syria is a challenge that the Arab league and its Secretary General
Ahmed Aboul-Gheit are not able to mount.
Referring the case over to more powerful organization, such as the United
Nations and its chief Antonio Guterres also proved futile. The international
body along with its influence has been compromised by the Russian veto which on
several occasions stood to thwart any attempt at salvaging Syria today. Similar
to a deteriorating patient awaiting an accurate clinical analysis , the
swiftness at which resident physicians concede to a treatment is an imperative
control to curb the spread of infection.
The world views Syria as an archipelago entrapped inside a strong ring of fire
fueled by sectarian strife, disagreement and internal armed conflict. It is hard
to believe that a group of embattled islands are able to independently and
promptly restore stability away from the foreign forces entangled in the Syria
civil war.
Syria has been ripped apart by foreign influence. The Bashar al-Assad lead
regime, backed by Russia and Iran, stretches the borders of its control over 22
percent of the country. Despite Moscow claiming credit on single-handedly
preventing the regime from losing its capital Damascus, assuming that Russia is
the sole dominant influence over regime territory is short to an exaggeration.
Even though President Vladimir Putin’s Russia operates two air bases in Syria,
in Hmeimim and Tartus, Iran on the other hand has camp set up across regime
terrain, a commanding room in Damascus airport, and proxy militias overrunning
the spectrum.
Iran’s elite revolutionary guard strongly clings to Syria as a puzzle piece
integral to its regional expansionist agenda. Upon a closer look, it is clear
that an island making up for at least 30 percent of Syria land is swarmed by
ISIS hardliners. Kurdish units and Syrian rebels have rule over 20 percent of
land each. It is worth mentioning that Kurdish-run territory is home to three
United States airbases, and that some rebel factions are enlisted for US,
Western, and regional support.
Identical intricacy covers Syria’s airspace, the Russian surface to air S-400
missile system reigns over a majority of Syria. Added to the mix pot are the
raids staged not only by Israel air forces but by those of the US-led coalition
of over 60 countries.
Turkey’s air power also leads Operation Euphrates Shield over Syrian territory.
Jordan’s air forces registered an intervention in Syria as well, with the most
recent foreign trail left across Syrian skies belonging to Iraqi air forces.
Syria’s crisis is not limited to the presence of the terror group ISIS, it
stretches beyond that and will likely remain after ISIS is removed from the
picture. To be honest, ISIS did indeed reshuffle the cards, deepen the schism
and added to the bloodshed, but the Syria crisis is far too complicated to be
summed up by the terror group.
Finding a Syria settlement is all the more difficult today. How can Syrian
territory be stabilized and broken free from its dismantled shape, when the
entire world builds up its policy in light of a disbanded and crumbled Syria.
Syria has been spread too thin by the war and become overwhelmed. Where are
Russian limits drawn in this divided country? What borders Iran’s role? The
American role? The Arab role? And can the Syrians find it in themselves to
restore their country?
Each of the abovementioned partakers have costly stakes invested in Syria’s
vicious war that can only be paralleled in its callousness to World War II. The
Syria battlefield has registered the horrendous accounts of barrel bombs,
suicide attackers, and human slaughterhouses. With losses of such grand scale,
parties will not concede to a settlement trivial to sacrifices made or that does
not guarantee long-lasting peace. Both Syrians and Arabs pursue a settlement for
Syria, a country that is central to Arab world’s both history and unwritten
future.
The Arab world remains frail so long that Syria is a scene for ongoing
transgressions sunk in disarray. Only the people of Syria can decide for their
country. More so, Arabs want for Syrians to find a Syria that is home to all its
diverse factions.
Iraq and Syria, post ISIS
Sawsan Al Shaer/Al Arabiya/March 01/17
With a new American administration in place an idea has begun to crystallize in
the war against ISIS.
This idea is not limited to deploying helicopters and artillery in Raqqa and
Mosul and empowering the presence of special forces but also includes forming a
US-Gulf front that contributes to fighting ISIS on condition that the areas
liberated from ISIS are not occupied by Iran or militias affiliated with it.
This is the major point concluded by the Moscow document and the US Secretary of
Defense James Mattis’ visit to the Gulf and Iraq. So there’s a
US-Russian-Turkish-Gulf agreement to end the Iranian expansion in Arab capitals.
We must be clear regarding this point if the world wants our cooperation to
eliminate ISIS.In exchange for any Gulf or Arab contribution in the war against
ISIS, whether in Iraq or Syria, Iran must be outside these areas. This message
must be clear to the Iraqi government. Mattis said that the US will continue to
support Iraq even after it liberates it from ISIS.
If we link this stance to Mattis’ stance on Iran, as a state that sponsors
terrorism, we will realize we are before a united front that does not only
insist on the exit of Iranian forces from Iraq and Syria but that also wants to
end Iranian influence in them. This message is conveyed by both, Gulf countries
and the US.
Establishing a US-Gulf front is the headline of the next phase. It carries the
slogan of the Arabism of the lands liberated from ISIS. It is soon that the
world will clearly know who supports terrorism and helps ISIS stay and who
really wants to get rid of it or use it an excuse to expand.
If Iraq wants Gulf countries to support its security and stability by
cooperating with the US, it must act to address the security chaos caused by
Iranian militias on its land
The exit of foreign forces and militias supported by Iran from Syria and Iraq is
a major helpful goal. The post-ISIS phase is being discussed even before
eliminating the group. This is what Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir
mentioned when he announced his country’s willingness to send troops to Syria to
combat ISIS in cooperation with the US. In an
interview with the German daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Jubeir said: “Saudi Arabia
and other Gulf countries announced they’re willing to participate with special
troops alongside the US. Some countries from the Islamic Alliance to fight
terrorism and extremism are also ready to send troops.” He added: “We will
coordinate with the US to know what the plan is and what is necessary to execute
it.”
ISIS-combat plan
It is worth noting that the US President Donald Trump ordered Mattis to draw up
a plan within 30 days to combat ISIS. Jubeir also told the German daily that he
expects these plans to be proposed soon, indirectly hinting that liberated zones
in Syria may be handed over to the opposition.
“The major idea is to liberate areas from ISIS and to also guarantee that these
areas do not fall in the hands of Hezbollah, Iran or the (Syrian) regime,”
Jubeir added. On January 4, Turkish Foreign Minister
Mevlut Cavusoglu said that the Syrian regime must go back to the table of
negotiations to hold direct negotiations with the opposition in order to achieve
peaceful political transition in Syria. “We must send a strong message in which
we demand that all foreign militias exit Syrian territories immediately,” he
said. Turkish FM emphasized the importance of the
withdrawal of all militias from Syria in the end of 2016 after what was known as
the Russian-Iranian-Turkish document was announced. This document led to calling
for the Astana conference in Kazakhstan. Therefore,
Russia does not at all oppose Iran’s exit from Syria and Iraq as on the contrary
this serves its interest if we take into consideration that Iran’s presence will
keep the Syrian front ablaze even if the resistance is forced to give up its
weapons.
The post-ISIS phase
Meanwhile in Iraq, talking about the post-ISIS phase has in fact begun. They
also began to particularly address the Iranian situation, like the case is in
Syria. This is why former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki rushed to visit
Iran in the beginning of January as he felt the circumstances are accumulating
against Iran.He rushed to meet with Ali Akbar Velayati, Khamenei’s international
affairs advisor, to be reassured over his future. On January 4, Al-Arabiya.net
reported that according to the Mehr news agency, Maliki said he went to Iran to
meet with Khamenei to discuss what he called “possible threats post-ISIS.”
Al-Arabiya’s report added: “This is a new political term in international and
regional politics especially that the war against ISIS has not ended yet in Iraq
and Syria. The point of Maliki’s statements that he went to Iran to discuss
possible threats post-ISIS with Iranian officials are unclear as the extremist
organization is not present among the Iranians and ISIS does not have any
announced military activity in Iran.”
**This article is also available in Arabic.
Toward the rising sun
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/March 01/17
Asia is the biggest continent where more than one third of the world population
lives. The continent’s population has quadrupled during the 20th century.
The strange irony is that some geographers only consider Europe – which
we always call the European continent – as a “western addition to Asia”. Mr.
Barry Cunliffe, an Emeritus Professor of archaeology at Oxford University argues
this while explaining his geographic location by saying there is no logical and
materialistic separation between the mother continent and its political
addition. Aside from this debate, Saudi Arabia has
opened a new chapter with East Asia – the massive and calm East with its
different directions. Each direction views itself as an important and different
center regardless of how much economic or commercial blocs intertwined with the
rest of the world. Each step toward the sun is calculated.
Malaysian President Najib Abdul Razak made a significant statement when
he honored the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman, for choosing
Malaysia as his first stop in his recent Asian tour. Abdul Razak noted that it
is expected for Saudi investments to create thousands of job opportunities in a
country, which has been one of the strongest and most stable Asian economies for
years. The roles that Asian banks and companies will
play will be major in terms of Saudi Arabia’s plans to develop non-oil
industries and expand international investments
‘Purest land on earth’
The Malaysian cabinet’s statements suggest that they are very proud that
Malaysian companies were picked to execute distinctive projects in “the purest
land on earth” as Abdul Razak put it. He added that plans “also include
operating and maintaining the South Line to the holy sites’ metro and working on
the Jamarat Bridge and the area surrounding it in Mina.”“It’s a source of pride
for us that Malaysia is part of the team which designed the Makkah Royal Clock
Tower Hotel in the Grand Mosque,” the Malaysian president concluded. The Saudi
people can sense this pride whenever they meet a Malaysian citizen.
Malaysia’s king, Sultan Muhammad V, awarded the Saudi king with the Order of the
Crown, the most significant Malaysian decorations, and commended the historical
depth between the two countries especially as he addressed Saudi Arabia’s
services to pilgrims and visitors of the holy sites. The Saudi king had
delivered speech before him and said the kingdom always stands behind what
serves Islam and Muslims across the world. The value
of trade and investments between the two countries is significant. This is a
renewed old Saudi orientation and King Salman defined it through bilateral
cooperation and economic relations and investments. The value of commercial
trade seems to be capable of steadily increasing in the next years with
countries in Asia that the Saudi king’s current tour will include.
Trade and investment
Speaking of Malaysia, the value of trade in the past 10 years was $32 billion
between the two countries. This shows the extent of economic and investment
relations run between them.King Salman will head to Indonesia and newspapers
have begun reporting on this visit ever since it was announced. These newspapers
headlines voice great hope in the projects, which will be signed between Saudi
Arabia and Indonesia as part of the king’s ambitious plan to reform the
country’s economy and diversify investment. The roles
that Asian banks and companies will play will be major in terms of Saudi
Arabia’s plans to develop non-oil industries and expand international
investments. The Saudi intent today seems clear and
more serious on the level of economic integration and regional investments,
which are distinguished by their historical depth. Indonesia will be the next
stop, and then there will be Japan and China, the two more silent and productive
giants. This will be followed by Maldives and Brunei.
It is a tour toward the East where directions do not end and wonders do not
cease.
*This article was first published in Al-Bayan on March 01, 2016.
The giant wakes up: Saudi Capital Market embraces new
reforms
Dr. Mohamed A. Ramady/Al Arabiya/March 01/17
The Gulf’s biggest stock exchange, the Saudi Tadawul, has belied the perception
of being too slow to act, and has woken up with a roar, with some new reforms
that could force the other Gulf bourses to follow suit.
The most dramatic new changes are in allowing the listing of small
capitalized Saudi firms, the so called SME’s-or Small and Medium sized
Enterprises-to list in a parallel Saudi stock exchange to give a boost to this
SME sector and expand the number of listed companies, compared to the current
primary market which is dominated by larger capitalized and well establishes
firms. On Sunday 26 February, the NOMU-Parallel stock
market was launched with a debut of seven firms in the retail, food and
industrial sectors and reached an initial market capitalization of SR 1.9 B,
with all companies gaining 20 per cent on the first trading day, their maximum
daily limit, but which admittedly is still a tiny fraction of the formal market
with a capitalization of SR 1.512 T ($403 B), and 178 listed companies.
The minimum capitalization in this new parallel market is SR 10 M ($2.7 Mil) or
10 per cent of requirement of main market listing and trading is limited to
“qualified investors” such as institutions and government related entities with
a fluctuation limit of 20 per cent to avoid undue speculation and erratic share
price movements by retail investors which has plagued the formal stock market,
given the so called “herd mentality” of small retail investors who seek short
term profit as opposed to long term value added investment returns like
institutional investors. However retail investors can
access these parallel market listings through investment funds, with specified
investment strategies to reduce risk of direct investments. The seven new debut
companies are a mixture of sizes, with IPO share prices ranging from SR 11
($2.9) to SR 78 ($20.8), and the new number of shares listed ranging from
230,000 to 6,750,000 shares. “This is a positive move
to add breadth and depth to the Saudi market which has been dominated by the
larger IPO and capitalized companies and is part of the strategy to diversify
the economy and provide new capital access to SME companies away from
traditional bank lending”. The Gulf’s biggest stock exchange is seeking to
attract more capital from abroad as Saudi Arabia goes through unprecedented
economic and social change.
Vision 2030
Foreign investment is a cornerstone of Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s
“Saudi Vision 2030,” a blueprint for the post-oil period that includes plans to
sell shares in state oil giant Saudi Aramco and expand its sovereign wealth fund
into becoming the world’s largest. The private sector, and especially the SME
sector, are slated to be the driving force for this new diversified Saudi
economy and listing SME’s especially in the tourism, medical, food and IT
sectors will assist in raising capital, expanding their base and creating local
jobs.This new move has certainly put practical teeth to the longer term
transformation plan, and the ordinary Saudi citizen can see the immediate
benefit and participate in it. The list of possible new listing from the Saudi
Joint Stock Companies (JSC’s) who are potentially eligible is truly staggering,
with around 4,500 registered JSC’s, out of 68,000 Saudi private sector companies
.
Given regional interest in the large Saudi stock exchange with its large
consumer and industrial base, companies from the GCC will be allowed to list in
the parallel market as a primary or secondary listing.
According to the Saudi Stock Market head, 38 new companies will be listed in
2017, and the Saudi Capital Market Authority’s Vice Chairman Mohammed Al Kuwaiz
said that the parallel market will be open to foreign qualified investors by 2Q
2017, and added that a lot of financial advisers are looking at the opening up
of the market, as well as the privatization program and feel that the change in
the overall market infrastructure is an opportunity, as the regulator has seen
“a tremendously increasing amount of interest” from foreign firms seeking
licensing to operate in Saudi Arabia.
Given regional interest in the large Saudi stock exchange with its large
consumer and industrial base, companies from the Gulf Cooperation Council will
be allowed to list in the parallel market as a primary or secondary listing.
Separately, there are more reforms in the pipeline concerning the formal market
and Saudi Arabia is counting on rules that will extend the settlement cycle on
stock trades to attract more foreign investors as currently the Tadawul stock
exchange has about fifty qualified foreign investors and expects to draw more
after shifting to a T+2 cycle (transaction date plus two days for settlement) by
the end of June 2017, a system used across most major exchanges, while the
current system requires same-day settlement.
Foreign direct investment
The Saudi stock market started allowing limited foreign direct investment in
2015 and eased restrictions further last year and foreigners currently own about
4 per cent of shares, with regulators arguing for more qualified foreign
investors be allowed to participate, as they will ostensibly add a longer term
investment, value added approach by assessing economic fundamentals of Saudi
listed companies and sectors as opposed to emotion driven intra -day retail
sector trading.Another goal for Saudi Arabia is to be included in the
prestigious emerging market MSCI or Morgan Stanley Capital International index,
and the planned draft regulations for the settlement shift has already received
encouraging feedback from most global index providers, including the MSCI. The
kingdom is keen in seeking to join MSCI’s emerging market index, which is
tracked by some of the world’s biggest fund managers.The “T+2”is an important
piece of change for MSCI to move forward to include Saudi Arabia on its
emerging-market watch list, as the new settlement cycle would bring the Tadawul
in line with international best practices. No longer will foreign qualified
investors have to hold large funds in the Kingdom with their local brokers to
execute transactions on same day settlement basis, but can do so two days after
the transaction allowing them to manage their international liquidity more
efficiently. The lion has awakened.
Trump and the Russians
Hussein Shobokshi/Al Arabiya/March 01/17
To many observers of the American affairs, the resignation of US national
security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, following the revelation of his connection
with Russian officials, did not come as a big surprise, rather it was a
confirmation of the theory of Russia’s penetration into the administration of
President Donald Trump. This also confirms the stories that were intensively
circulating during the days of the presidential campaign pointing out “close
relationship” between influential leaders in the Donald Trump’s inner circle and
important officials in the Russian government. Apart from this, statements
repeatedly made by Donald Trump himself during his presidential campaign, also
heaped praises for Russian President Vladimir Putin.The issue is of serious
concern in the US, especially with the media heavyweights of the likes of the
New York Times, which normally represents opinions of the State Department and
the Washington Post, which reflects the opinions of the Ministry of Defense,
both have adopted a strong line of inquiry with Donald Trump accusing him of his
suspicious links with the Russian officials.It is no secret that the veteran
Vladimir Putin still feels the intense pain of bitterness suffered by the
Soviets during their humiliating defeat in Afghanistan at the hands of the
Americans. Also there is a strong conviction about America’s involvement in
breaking up of the former Soviet Union during the reign of former President
Mikhail Gorbachev.America today is divided between those who say that the
country has been kidnapped a constitutional coup at the hands of the extremists
and those who claim that it has been restored to its owners
Signs of revenge
Today, according to Putin, America continues to threaten the security of Russia
by its interference in Georgia and Ukraine — two traditionally former Russian
states — and by planting missiles in eastern Europe, an issue which Russia
considers as a direct threat to its national strategic security.
And there the signs of revenge gradually began to surface and the image of
Trump, as if a Russian candidate, began to appear with increasing talk about the
special relationship between Putin and Trump and the latter’s continuous refusal
to criticize President Putin or oppose his controversial and dubious human
rights record.Today there are very serious calls by the influential members in
both the Democratic and Republican members of the Congress in the United States
for extensive investigations into alleged breaches of Russian government in the
decision-making policies in the White House and being a great threat to the US
national security. This important issue came to light after allegations from the
Democratic Party and its presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s claims that
the Russian intelligence services had managed to infiltrate in the functioning
of the Democratic Party and learned the secrets of the private correspondence
between its members.
Divided America
Not only this, Democrats also alleged that and also Russians hacked into the
automatic electronic devices of the voting system during the US presidential
election, which favored the Republican candidate Donald Trump. The fourth
estate, a term given to the media system in the West, now functions in the
“investigations and detection” for deciphering the mysteries of the relationship
between President Donald Trump and the Russians. They believe that they will be
able to know the “full truth,” just as they did in the investigation of the
Watergate scandal during the era of former President Richard Nixon, which was
exposed by a reporter from the Washington Post. America today is divided between
those who say that the country has been kidnapped a constitutional coup at the
hands of the extremists and those who claim that it has been restored to its
owners and is being protected. While others are of the opinion that what is
happening today is not presumed innocent and the mysterious and dubious
relationship between President Trump and Russia must be revealed.
Excitement and suspense is going on in an unprecedented way, more than a month
after the takeover of the US presidency by Donald Trump. It seems very exciting
days are yet to come!
*This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on February 27, 2016.
Political Operatives Pose as Journalists, Human Rights
Groups
Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/March 1, 2017
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9998/palestinians-political-operatives-journalists
The same activists and organizations were silent when the Palestinian Authority
(PA) security forces arrested al-Qiq and harassed his family. Amnesty
International neglected to mention that al-Qiq has also been targeted by PA
security forces and that, in addition to his work as a newsman, he is also
affiliated with Hamas. This detail, according to Amnesty, is evidently not
significant.
When arrested, such political operatives posing as journalists -- and so-called
human rights groups, and the mainstream media in the West -- get to scream about
Israel assaulting freedom of the media. This dirty little game has been played
by Palestinian and Western journalists and highly politicized, biased human
rights groups for years.
The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate (PJS), which is headed by Nasser Abu
Baker, did not come out in support of journalist, Sami al-Sai when he was
arrested (and tortured) for 20 days in the PA's notorious Jericho Central
Prison. Nor did Amnesty or most human rights organizations come out in defense
of al-Sai.
Instead of calling on the PA leadership to release their detained colleague, Abu
Baker and the PJS heads issued a statement in which they justified his arrest
and defended the PA against charges of torturing him.
Nasser Abu Baker himself is affiliated with the PA's ruling Fatah faction.
Recently, the AFP correspondent even ran (and lost) in the election for Fatah's
Revolutionary Council.
While AFP has been reporting about the detention by Israel of al-Qiq, it has
conspicuously failed to report about the plight of al-Sai and his serious
charges of torture in PA prison. So a journalist arrested by the PA is not worth
a story in an international media outlet, while anyone arrested by Israel gets
wide coverage.
Now it is official: double standards, racism, and political activism are an
integral part of the modern media.
Two Palestinian journalists are arrested -- one by Israel and the other by the
Palestinian Authority (PA). The name of the one arrested by Israel is Muhammad
al-Qiq. The name of the one arrested by the PA security forces is Sami al-Sai.
Although he is registered as a journalist, al-Qiq was arrested for
security-related offenses completely unrelated to his profession. Israel did not
arrest him because of his reporting or his writing, but because of his
activities on behalf of Hamas. As a student at Bir Zeit University in 2006,
al-Qiq was already known to be affiliated with Hamas. He was a member of the
Islamic Bloc -- a student list belonging to Hamas.
Al-Qiq's affiliation with Hamas even got him into trouble with the Palestinian
Authority; its forces arrested and interrogated him several times in the past
few years. The last time his family received a visit from PA security officers
was in 2014. Then, officers in plainclothes seized al-Qiq's laptop and personal
documents.
Now, al-Qiq is in Israeli detention, where he has gone on hunger strike in
protest against his arrest.
Guess who is campaigning on his behalf and demanding that Israel immediately and
unconditionally release him from detention? The same PA that repeatedly arrested
and harassed al-Qiq over the past few years.
In addition, human rights organizations and activists have endorsed the case and
are now using it to attack Israel. These are the same activists and
organizations that were silent when the PA security forces arrested al-Qiq and
harassed his family.
One of these organizations is Amnesty International, which issued a statement
last week calling on Israel to release the detained "journalist." Amnesty
neglected to mention that al-Qiq has also been targeted by the PA security
forces and that, in addition to his work as a newsman, he is also affiliated
with Hamas. This detail, according to Amnesty, is evidently not significant.
The truth is that most, if not all, Palestinian journalists arrested by Israel
are targeted not because of their work in the field of journalism, but because
of their activities on behalf of various Palestinian groups, including Hamas. It
is an open secret that many Palestinian "journalists" are in fact political
activists who are openly affiliated with one terrorist group or another.
When arrested, such political operatives posing as journalists -- and so-called
human rights groups, and the mainstream media in the West -- get to scream about
Israel assaulting freedom of the media. This dirty little game has been played
by Palestinian and Western journalists and highly politicized, biased human
rights groups for years. Yet, why discuss it when you can leverage it against
Israel?
Here is another missing fact related to the detention of the Hamas
activist-turned journalist: The Fatah-controlled Palestinian Journalists
Syndicate (PJS), which is based in Ramallah, has also joined the campaign to
demand the release of al-Qiq from Israeli detention.
Why is this detail important? Because the PJS, which is headed by Nasser Abu
Baker (also spelled Abu Bakr), who also serves as a correspondent for Agence
France-Presse (AFP), did not come out in support of the other journalist, Sami
al-Sai, when he was arrested (and tortured) for 20 days in the PA's notorious
Jericho Central Prison. Nor did Amnesty or most human rights organizations come
out in defense of al-Sai when he was being held by the PA security forces.
Sami al-Sai, who works as a correspondent for a private television station in
the Palestinian city of Tulkarem in the northern West Bank, was arrested for
"fomenting sectarian strife" through Facebook. This is a popular Palestinian
Authority charge, one that is used to justify the arrest of anyone who
criticizes PA leaders or who takes issue with the policies of Mahmoud Abbas.
The PJS at first refused to take up the case of al-Sai. The PJS rarely defends
journalists who are critical of the PA. That is because the head of the PJS, Abu
Baker himself, is affiliated with the PA's ruling Fatah faction. Recently, the
AFP correspondent even ran (and lost) in the election for Fatah's Revolutionary
Council. Facing criticism, Abu Baker and some of the
heads of the PJS agreed to visit al-Sai in his prison cell in Jericho. But
instead of calling on the Palestinian Authority leadership to release their
detained colleague, Abu Baker and the PJS heads issued a statement in which they
justified his arrest and defended the PA against charges of torturing him.
Nasser Abu Baker is a correspondent for Agence France-Presse and heads the
Ramallah-based Palestinian Journalists Syndicate (PJS). He is also a political
operative who recently ran in (and lost) an election for Fatah's Revolutionary
Council. When fellow journalist Sami al-Sai was thrown in jail for criticizing
the leadership of the Palestinian Authority (PA) on Facebook, Abu Baker and the
PJS justified his arrest and defended the PA against charges of torturing him.
While AFP has been reporting about the detention by Israel of al-Qiq and other
Palestinian "journalists," it has conspicuously failed to report about the
plight of al-Sai and his serious charges of torture in PA prison.
So a journalist arrested by the Palestinian Authority is not worth a story in an
international media outlet, while anyone arrested by Israel gets wide coverage.
Needless to say, Abu Baker, who covers Palestinian affairs for AFP, did not
bother to write a story about his visit to the Jericho prison and the meeting
with al-Sai.
As chairman of a Fatah-controlled body, Abu Baker is not going to report to AFP
anything that would reflect negatively on the PA leadership.
Even more bizarre is that an AFP correspondent would be allowed to run for
political office and continue with his work as if nothing happened. Would Le
Monde allow its diplomatic correspondent to cover the French elections if he was
also running for office? Apparently, the conflict of interest does not bother
Abu Baker's superiors at AFP.
The case of the two journalists -- Muhammad al-Qiq and Sami al-Sai -- provides
further evidence of the hypocrisy, double standards, bias and racism that the
Palestinian and Western media continue to demonstrate concerning the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Any story that could negatively affect the
Palestinian Authority or Hamas is not "fit for print." Human rights groups and
the media clearly do not care if a Palestinian is detained and tortured by
Palestinians.
A story becomes news when it is possible to lay blame on Israel. Western (and
some Israeli) journalists covering Palestinian issues justify their double
standard by arguing that if they criticized the PA or any of its senior figures,
they would be barred from Ramallah or shouted at and denied access to sources.
Here is the truth: prejudice works and intimidation works. Journalists and human
rights groups would rather distort and practice self-censorship than report
accurately about Israel or anger the Palestinian Authority leadership.
In Israel, however, journalists write negative things about the Israeli
government and army and police from sunrise to sundown without fearing anything.
Now it is official: double standards, racism, and political activism are an
integral part of the modern media.
**Bassam Tawil is a scholar based in the Middle East.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Saudis Optimistic On Trump Administration's Middle East
Policy, Express Hope It Will Act Against Iran
MEMRI/March 01/17
The beginning of the presidency of Donald Trump in the U.S. generated optimism
in Saudi Arabia about the new American administration. This was especially the
case in light of the previous presidency, that of Barack Obama, during which the
U.S. and Saudi Arabia grew apart, and the Obama administration's measures in the
Middle East that were contradictory to Saudi political positions – the apex of
which was the JCPOA agreement.
Although during the elections the Saudis expressed no explicit support for
Trump, since his inauguration they are expecting the next four years to bring
U.S. action aimed at weakening Iran and supporting Saudi policy, and at
strengthening U.S.-Saudi ties as well as U.S. ties with other Sunni countries.
These Saudi expectations have been bolstered by some anti-Iran statements made
and measures taken by the new U.S. administration. Among other things, President
Trump attacked the JCPOA, calling it a bad deal that saved Iran from
bankruptcy,[1] and Secretary of Defense James Mattis stated that Iran the
world's "biggest state sponsor of terrorism."[2]President Trump also tweeted
criticism of Iran's takeover of increasingly large parts of
Iraq.[3]Additionally, following the January 30, 2017 attack by the
Iranian-backed Houthis on a Saudi frigate on the Yemeni border, the U.S.
deployed the USS Cole to the Strait of Bab-el-Mandeb off the coast of
Yemen.[4]Furthermore, according to recent reports, the administration is
considering designating Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a
terrorist organization.[5]
Saudi expectations of U.S. policy under Donald Trump and praise for the new
administration and its perceived policies are being expressed in statements by
Saudi officials as well as in numerous articles and cartoons in the Saudi press.
Additionally, many of the articles discussing the administration predicted that
future American moves in the Middle East would serve Saudi interests,
particularly in its rivalry with Iran.
This report will review comments by Saudi officials, as well as excerpts from
articles in the Saudi press published since President Trump's inauguration,
reflecting this Saudi optimism vis-à-vis the new U.S. administration.
Saudi Officials: Trump's Aggressive Messages To Iran Are A Welcome Change
The compatibility between the political positions of the Trump administration
and Saudi Arabia's desire to weaken Iran and consolidate its image as fighting
terrorism were clearly expressed in a January 29, 2017 phone conversation
between President Trump and Saudi King Salman. According to the White House, the
two agreed that the JCPOA must be "rigorously enforced," and that Iranian
actions that destabilize the Middle East should be addressed. They also agreed
to bolster their joint efforts to combat the spread of radical Islamic
terrorism.[6] A Saudi news agency report on the conversation also stated that
President Trump and King Salman see eye to eye on the issues of the fight
against terrorism and its financing, and that they discussed the U.S.-Saudi
strategic partnership and its economic, security, and military aspects.[7] These
same topics were raised in another phone call, on January 31, between Saudi
Deputy Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman and U.S. Secretary of Defense James
Mattis, in which the two discussed the implementation of the previous
conversation between the two leaders on U.S.-Saudi strategic cooperation, the
fight against terrorism, and opposition to Iranian interference in Middle East
affairs.[8]
Saudi Arabia's enthusiasm about the new American administration was clearly
discernable in comments by Saudi officials, chiefly Deputy Crown Prince Muhammad
bin Salman and Foreign Minister 'Adel Al-Jubeir, before and after Trump's
inauguration, expressing overt support for the U.S. and hostility towards Iran.
Thus, on January 9, 2017, some two weeks before Trump's inauguration, Deputy
Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman told Foreign Affairs magazine in an interview
that he was interested in renewing the strategic dialogue between the countries,
which under Obama had stopped for reasons that were not clear.[9] Similarly, in
a January 15 press conference, Al-Jubeir said that Saudi Arabia has no fear of
Trump, but seeks the same thing he seeks in fighting terrorism and in firmness
vis-à-vis Iran.[10] In a separate press conference in Riyadh, on January 24,
Al-Jubeir said that Saudi Arabia supports the vision of President Trump, who
seeks to combat ISIS and block Iran, adding that Saudi-U.S. relations are
longstanding, as is their ongoing cooperation in security, politics, and
economics. He also said that Saudi Arabia yearns for a positive American future
worldwide.[11]
Speaking at the Munich Security Conference on February 19, 2017, Al-Jubeir
praised Trump, calling him "a pragmatic man who seeks to solve crises and lead
the world, and who acts to close any loophole that terrorist organizations could
exploit." He added: "Just like us, he believes that we must get rid of ISIS, and
the officials he appointed to his administration have a lot of experience and
are highly capable. Therefore, we expect to see American involvement [in Middle
East issues] and rational foreign policy..." Al-Jubeir also echoed the Trump
administration's designation of Iran as the country that sponsors terrorism more
than any other in the world.[12]
Trump declares Iran "No. 1 Terrorist" ('Okaz, Saudi Arabia, February 8, 2017)
The following day, Al-Jubeir added to his praise for Trump and his policy, in an
interview with the German daily Der Spiegel, in which he said that Trump was
realistic and not crazy, and that the Saudis share his goals of combatting
terrorism and upping the pressure on Iran. As for Trump's ban on entry to the
U.S. for citizens of seven Muslim countries, Al-Jubeir said that the decision
did not target Saudi Arabia and that in any case the Saudis respect Washington's
right to oversee all those who come into the country. He added that Saudi Arabia
was optimistic and was expecting more cooperation with the U.S. than in the
past, and that Trump's aggressive messages to Iran were a welcome change.[13]
Saudi Press: High Expectations From The Trump Administration's Anti-Iran
Policies
Saudi expectations of closer relations with the new American administration and
of a stronger regional status for Saudi Arabia were also widely expressed in the
Saudi press. News of Saudi-American contacts and anti-Iran moves by the U.S.
made the front pages of official Saudi newspapers. Several editorials and op-eds
praised the U.S. policy under Trump, and predicted that Iran faced a bitter fate
if it continued its attempts to influence political conflicts in the Middle
East, and offered other predictions on moves Trump could make in Iraq and Yemen
that would also serve Saudi interests. Many cartoons also focused on the
substantial American pressure on Iran.
On the other hand, several articles in the Saudi press also called for tempering
expectations from the Trump administration, arguing that Saudis must first wait
and see what Trump will actually do, beyond his hawkish statements.
Editorials: Trump's Administration "Will Have No Patience With Iran," Is "Not
Ruling Out The Possibility Of Military Action Against" It
Editorials in the official Saudi press were openly delighted by Trump's stern
messages to Iran, and presented assessments that his U.S. policy would be more
aggressive towards Iran than the Obama administration's – particularly with
regard to enforcing the JCPOA. Thus, the Saudi daily 'Okaz wrote in an
editorial: "It has become clear that the American administration of President
Donald Trump will have no patience with Iran. Apparently, [Iran] considered the
'bribes' that it received from the previous president, Barack Obama, in order to
arrive at an agreement on its nuclear program to be an American weakness from
which Washington would never recover. [But now] it is clear to the American
administration that Iran is engaged in activity aimed at destabilizing [the
region], that it is seeking to harm U.S. allies, and that it is violating the UN
ban on supplying [arms] to revolutionary militias in Yemen. The [January 30,
2017] attempt [by the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen] to blow up a Saudi
frigate off the coast of Yemen and the [January 29, 2017] test [launching] of a
ballistic missile against the Gulf states were a step too far, and Washington
could no longer remain silent as it had under Obama.
"Therefore, [then-]National Security advisor Michael Flynn spoke sternly and
warned that the U.S. would absolutely not remain silent over Iran's suspicious
activities, and President Trump later reminded the Khamenei regime, in a tweet,
that Iran would have been on the verge of collapse without the funds sent by
Obama on the pretext that these were frozen Iranian funds.
"These developments are coming in the wake of a phone conversation between King
Salman and Trump... and also after a follow-up phone conversation between Deputy
Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman and Secretary of State Jim Matthews [sic; James
Mattis], in which they agreed that Iran's terror activity, which aims to
destabilize [certain] countries and interfere in their [internal] affairs,
whether directly or via its agents and proxies [in those countries], must be
dealt with. Another interesting thing was Trump's tweet from yesterday [February
2, 2017] regarding Iranian hegemony in Iraq, which he said is increasing every
day. These are all signs that this will be a critical year for the lies and
threats by Iran, which is trapped in delusions of joining the nuclear club and
in dreams of gnawing away at the Arabian Peninsula and the Fertile
Crescent."[14]
Al-Riyadh made similar arguments in an editorial, even predicting a possible
U.S.-Iran military conflict: "The air of escalation in the Washington-Tehran
discourse is continuing, and is exacerbated by the tweets by American President,
Donald Trump... He accused Iran of 'playing with fire' and added: '[T]hey don't
appreciate how 'kind' president Obama was to them. Not me!' This shows that
Trump will not continue in his predecessor's footsteps in dealing with the
Iranian dossier; rather, he will be stricter about the implementation of the
nuclear agreement and will make no concessions on the path to blocking Iran
[from attaining nuclear weapons]. This is especially true since Washington
considers Tehran a major supporter of terrorism, in both the region and the
world.
"The characteristics of Trump's view on dealing with the Iranian regime were
clarified by his previous tweets, in which he called the nuclear agreement
'terrible.' This shows that he is completely dissatisfied with this agreement
and is searching for a way that will allow him to cancel it. He is also not
ruling out the possibility of military action against the Iranian regime. Thus,
all signs point to the new American administration sooner or later entering into
direct conflict with the Iranian regime, and there is no better evidence for
this than the economic sanctions against 13 Iranian individuals and 12 Iranian
companies – a first step that will surely be followed by more that are no less
aggressive..."[15]
Saudi Columnist: The Trump Administration's Position Towards Iran Is Identical
To That Of The Gulf States; Muslim Brotherhood Could Be Designated A Terrorist
Organization
High hopes for anti-Iran action by the Trump administration were also expressed
in op-eds by many Saudi writers. Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh, a columnist for the
Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, also argued that the new American administration would
be harsher on Iran and would also act decisively against political Islam
movements, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). He wrote: "All signs point
to the fact that the Iranians, and the Arabs who follow in their path, have
rough years ahead of them. We can also expect the MB to be classified as a
terrorist organization, so that its supporters will be persecuted and pressured,
just like members of the terrorist organization Hizbullah.
"It is clear to all that the position of President Trump and his administration
officials on Iran's ayatollahs is the same as the position that the Gulf
[countries] attempted to persuade President Obama [to adopt]. But [Obama] and
his administration insisted on disregarding all these Gulf efforts and blatantly
ignored Iran's terrorist activity and the expansion it and its militias were
carrying out in the region... According to many analysts, a harsh phase of
economic sanctions [on Iran] by the Trump administration will strangle its
domestic economy once again, particularly because President Trump, unlike
President Obama, is a man who 'does what he says he will do'... I do not believe
that President Trump will use military force to punish the Persian ayatollahs,
but Iran will likely suffocate from a collection of [U.S.] decisions that
constitute economic siege, which is like a slow death for countries nowadays...
"Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries suffered greatly during President Obama's
two terms, and the Arab world also suffered from what the Americans called 'the
Arab Spring.' It seems as though that phase is now a part of history, with
Obama's departure and Hillary Clinton's election loss. Based on the fact that
Trump and his team took a stand against terrorism and are acting to uproot it
and all its elements – as [Trump] promised he would do – I can say that
ultimately political Islam, both Sunni and Shi'ite, will become a target for
elimination, in order to destroy terrorism..."[16]
Former Al-Sharq Al-Awsat Editor: Trump Must Take Steps Against Iran In Order To
Protect American Interests
Salman Al-Dosari, a former editor of the London-based Saudi daily Al-Sharq
Al-Awsat, proposed a series of anti-Iran steps for the new American
administration that would protect its interests in the region and that are also
largely in line with Saudi interests there. He wrote: "Washington has four cards
it can use to isolate Iran: The first is to raise the price Iran [pays] for
continuing its intransigence, and focusing on meticulously implementing the
nuclear agreement, instead of canceling it, at least for now. This will ensure
that Iran's ability to produce a nuclear bomb does not increase, and also that
the 'biggest state sponsor of terrorism,' as Washington calls it, will be
deterred. The second card is to cancel the disaster of handing Iraq over to
Iran, since this is what gave the Iranian government, and its militias and
proxies, free rein to expand in the region and threaten American interests...
"The third card is to include Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and its
associate organizations in the list of terrorist organizations. Since they are
not so designated, they are sowing terrible destruction and chaos, and harming
American interests, under an official umbrella that allows them [to do] what
other terrorist organizations like ISIS and Al-Qaeda cannot.
"The fourth card is to tighten the noose on Iran's aid to [Houthi]
revolutionaries in Yemen – an element threatening peace and promoting chaos in
that country, [which persists] so long as [Iran's] weapons shipments to its
allies in Yemen continue in violation of the UN ban on weapons transfers. This
[Iranian] activity is also a direct provocation against UN [Security Council]
Resolution 2231, which codifies the nuclear agreement, and is a clear example of
Iran's lack of serious commitment to the agreement. If Tehran continues to
violate the nuclear agreement, the U.S. will have no choice but to distance
itself from the agreement.
"It should be mentioned that the U.S.'s new anti-Iran policy does not mean a
desire for or encouragement of war, since no side is interested in such a war.
However, the new American administration is clearly aware of the serious danger
that Iran poses to its interests...
"The future will apparently bring an increase in the level of conflict, so that
it is indeed less than a war, but [will be conducted] by means that are
sufficient to largely thwart Iran's activity."
Criticism Of High Expectations From Trump: He Is No Different From His
Predecessors; There Is No Change On The Ground
Alongside the many articles expressing joy and optimism about Trump's Middle
East policy, particularly his intentions regarding Iran, several writers called
to temper expectations and wait for the American administration to take actual
steps that promote Saudi interests. For example, 'Abd Al-Aziz Al-Sweid, a writer
for the London-based Saudi daily Al-Hayat, wrote: "The American administration
is conducting a media campaign against the ayatollah regime in Iran, but [this
campaign] is confined to statements made by the president and by his aides, who
repeat his words. As for the sanctions levelled [by the U.S.] on companies tied
to Iran – this is nothing new, since the previous American administration did
the same thing gradually, but at the same time also gave Iran hundreds of
millions of dollars, worked with it in Iraq, and promoted its [Houthi] agent in
Yemen.
"In a short time, the Trump administration issued a new batch of dire statements
against Iran, to the point that it seemed to anyone following Trump that he was
riding his dark horse while drawing his two pistols in Khamenei's face! This new
batch [of statements] is nothing but political narcotics, which are different in
quality from those used by Kerry and Obama. The reality we face does not herald
changes on the ground. American forces still operate side-by-side with the IRGC
in Iraq. Two days ago, an IRGC official was killed in Mosul. Was he operating
far from the binoculars of American troops? If Trump is so extreme, why does he
continue to allow, or not to oppose, the barbaric crimes that the sectarian PMU
[in Iraq] and its leaders from Khamenei's IRGC commit against Sunni Iraqi
citizens, including children and elderly, under the pretext that they are
terrorists?!"[17]
[1] Twitter.com/realDonaldTrump, February 2, 2017.
[2] Al-Youm (Saudi Arabia), February 5, 2017.
[3] Twitter.com/realDonaldTrump, February 1, 2017.
[4] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), February 5, 2017.
[5] Al-Watan (Saudi Arabia), February 7, 2017; Al-Sharq (Saudi Arabia), February
9, 2017.
[6] Whitehouse.gov, January 29, 2017.
[7] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), January 30, 2017.
[8] Al-Hayat (London), February 1, 2017.
[9] 'Okaz (Saudi Arabia), January 9, 2017.
[10] Elaph.com, January 20, 2017.
[11] Al-Watan (Saudi Arabia), January 25, 2017.
[12] Alarabiya.net, February 19, 2017.
[13] T.arabi21.com, February 20, 2017. For more on Saudi Arabia's attitude
regarding Trump's Executive Order, see MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis No. 1299, Arab
World Split Over President Trump's Executive Order Suspending Entry Of Citizens
From Arab And Islamic Countries Into The U.S., February 7, 2017.
[14] 'Okaz (Saudi Arabia), February 3 2017.
[15] Al-Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), February 4, 2017.
[16] Al-Jazirah (Saudi Arabia), February 5, 2017.T
[17] Al-Hayat (London), February 7, 2017.