LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS
BULLETIN
March 01/17
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The
Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias/english.march01.17.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily
English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2016
Bible Quotations For Today
When you give alms, do not let your left hand know what
your right hand is doing
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 06/0104/:"‘Beware of
practising your piety before others in order to be seen by them; for then you
have no reward from your Father in heaven. ‘So whenever you give alms, do not
sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the
streets, so that they may be praised by others. Truly I tell you, they have
received their reward. But when you give alms, do not let your left hand know
what your right hand is doing, so that your alms may be done in secret; and your
Father who sees in secret will reward you."
Those who have never been told of him shall see, and those
who have never heard of him shall understand.
Letter to the Romans 15/14-21/:"I myself feel confident about you, my brothers
and sisters, that you yourselves are full of goodness, filled with all
knowledge, and able to instruct one another. Nevertheless, on some points I have
written to you rather boldly by way of reminder, because of the grace given me
by God to be a minister of Christ Jesus to the Gentiles in the priestly service
of the gospel of God, so that the offering of the Gentiles may be acceptable,
sanctified by the Holy Spirit. In Christ Jesus, then, I have reason to boast of
my work for God. For I will not venture to speak of anything except what Christ
has accomplished through me to win obedience from the Gentiles, by word and
deed, by the power of signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God, so
that from Jerusalem and as far around as Illyricum I have fully proclaimed the
good news of Christ. Thus I make it my ambition to proclaim the good news, not
where Christ has already been named, so that I do not build on someone else’s
foundation, but as it is written, ‘Those who have never been told of him shall
see, and those who have never heard of him shall understand.’"
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources
published english On March 01.17
Hizbullah Efforts To Impose Religious
Standards In Public Spark Anger Among South Lebanon Residents/MEMRI/February
28/17
The Faustian pact revisited: Aoun and Hariri/By Dr. Makram Rabah/Anadolu Agencys/February
28/17
Bishop Angaelos: Christians In Egypt Told To 'Leave Or Die', 40 Killed In 3
Months, Prays For ISIS/Joseph Hartropp/Christian Today/February 28/17
What to Remember in Fighting Radical Islam/Saied Shoaaib/Gatestone
Institute/February 28/17
Europe: Laughing at the Messenger/Douglas Murray/Gatestone Institute/February
28/17Time to Put an End to Montenegro's Bid to Join NATO/Grégoire Canlorbe/Gatestone
Institute/February 28/17
Rise in Executions and Crackdown Against Iran's Youth/NCRI/Tuesday, 28 February
2017
Iraq and Syria, post ISIS/Sawsan Al Shaer/Al Arabiya/February 28/17
Concessions did not save Geneva/Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 28/17
Saudi Arabia and Iraq, the spheres of Arabism/Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/February
28/17
Punish those who falsely accuse others/Khaled Almaeena/Al Arabiya/February 28/17
Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published
On March 01.17
Hizbullah Efforts To Impose Religious Standards In Public Spark Anger Among
South Lebanon Residents
The Faustian pact revisited: Aoun and Hariri
Geagea Urges Parliament Vote on New Electoral Law
Hariri: Women's Quota Prerequisite in New Electoral Law
Clashes Renew in Ain el-Hilweh after Ceasefire Collapses
UNRWA Condemns Armed Violence in Ain el-Hilweh Camp
Kanaan: Wage Scale Endorsement a Political Decision
Berri receives regional director for International Organization for Migration
Muslim, Christian clerics convene coexistence meeting
Hariri in launching office of Minister of State for Women Affairs: The time of
eliminating discrimination against women has come
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published On March 01.17
Civilians Flee Mosul Fighting as Iraq Forces
Battle IS
Syria ex-Qaida Says Opposition Leaders Must 'Step Aside'
Russia Wants Terrorism on Agenda of Syria Talks
UN Security Council to Vote Tuesday on Syria Sanctions
Trump Looks to Reboot in First Address to Congress
Trump Aide Conway Draws Ire for Kneeling on White House Sofa
Israeli Police Begin Evacuating West Bank Settler Homes
Netanyahu Hits Back ahead of Gaza War Report
Palestinian Municipal Elections in West Bank Only
Egypt Lawmaker Says Expulsion Warning to Opposition
Saudi Analyst: Iranian Regime's Terrorism Case to Be Reviewed During Saudi
King's Asian Tour
Iran Regime's MP: "So What? If People Are Selling Their Kidney out of Poverty,
Is It a Problem?"
Former Iranian Regime's MP Acknowledges Country's Deadly Recession
Links From Jihad Watch Site for March 01.17
Canada: Unvetted asylum seekers headed for Toronto
George W. Bush hits Trump, says Islamic jihadis “are not religious people”
Hugh Fitzgerald: The Highest and Best Use of Keith Ellison
Robert Spencer in PJ Media: “Can I Criticize Islam Without Fearing for My Life?”
Reza Aslan: Why he is not a Muslim
10 attacks on refugees daily in Germany: “Nazis are threatening refugees and
therefore our democracy”
Robert Spencer: The Roots of Islamic Anti-Semitism
India: Muslim group offers $15,000 reward to anyone who beheads Muslim
“moderate” Tarek Fatah
Robert Spencer: Good Riddance: Hijab-wearing Muslim NSC staffer quits, blames
Trump, claims victim status
Raymond Ibrahim: Pope Francis Tears at History’s Walls against Islam
McMaster and Gorka: Understanding or Misunderstanding Islam?
Mali: Muslims smash Timbuktu bars and liquor stalls
CPAC Declares World War III Against Jihad
Jamie Glazov Moment: Lindsay Lohan ‘Racially Profiled’ for Wearing Hijab?
US Army names Muslim chaplain spiritual leader of 14,000 mostly Christian
soldiers
Germany: Berlin truck jihadi frequented mosque that was Islamic State
recruitment center
Islamic State teaching its jihadis to eat non-Muslims
Kosovo imam indicted for “inciting terror activities”
Khamenei: The “real war” the West is pursuing is “culture war” against Islam
Glazov Gang: Robert Reich Blames Trump for Muslim Sweden Riots
Links From Christian Today Site
for March 01.17
Bishop Angaelos: Christians In Egypt Told To 'Leave Or Die', 40 Killed In 3
Months, Prays For ISIS
Theresa May: We Must Stand Up For Persecuted Christians
Does Being Conservative On Gay Sex Help Church Growth?
How Should Christians Respond To Donald Trump? Obama's Faith Advisor Sees A
Fresh Opportunity
Preparing For War While Seeking Peace: The Israeli Rabbi Who Lived By 'The Book
And The Sword'
Now Christian Art By The Masters Can Be Seen In Stunning Detail As Sistine
Chapel Is Digitally Photographed
Boycott Campaign Against Israel Is Latest 'Mutation' Of Oldest Hatred Says
Former Chief Rabbi
Egypt's Churches Condemn ISIS' 'Terrorist Acts Of Murder' Against Christians
Latest Lebanese Related News published
On March 01.17
Hizbullah Efforts To Impose Religious Standards In Public Spark Anger Among
South Lebanon Residents/مارسات داعشية لحزب الله في الجنوب
MEMRI/February 28/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=52841
In the last six months there have been increasing reports in the Lebanese media
regarding Hizbullah's efforts to enforce compliance with Islamic standards in
various towns in South Lebanon. This religious coercion is manifest in
announcements issued by municipal and local councils that are controlled by
Hizbullah representatives, ordering the closure of liquor stores or banning the
free mixing of men and women in public places. These measures sparked protest
among sectors in South Lebanon that support Hizbullah as a resistance
organization but do not necessarily agree with its religious policy. In many
cases the protest caused the local councils to rescind the orders. Criticism of
the measures was also voiced in the Lebanese press, including even in the daily
Al-Akhbar known for its support for Hizbullah.
This report reviews some of the coercive measures taken by Hizbullah and some of
the critical responses to them.
Banning Gender Mixing In Public Places, Events
In July 2016 the Lebanese press reported that the city council in the town of
Jebchit, in the Nabatiyah Governorate in South Lebanon, had banned women from
internet cafes and entertainment venues and also ordered to close these venues
during prayer times, in order to "preserve the residents' peace of mind and in
consideration of the shari'a and moral [standards]." The owners of these
businesses protested that the city council was not authorized to issue such an
order. A report in the pro-Hizbullah Al-Akhbar daily noted that the residents of
the town are religious but nevertheless oppose religious coercion. One of the
residents quoted in the daily even likened the order to measures taken by
ISIS.[1]
The same month it was reported that the mayor of Al-Khiam in South Lebanon had
canceled the participation of women in a marathon held in the area. Ibrahim
Haidar, a columnist for the Al-Nahar daily who addressed the issue in his
column, noted that the Al-Khiam city council is controlled by Hizbullah and that
the city has a Christian minority.[2] Al-Akhbar subsequently reported that 13
women from the town participated in the marathon despite the order.[3]
According to Al-Akhbar, the town of 'Aitaroun banned men and women bathing
together at the local swimming pool, sparking opposition from some residents,
most of who traditionally avoid gender mixing but nevertheless oppose religious
coercion by the authorities as a matter of principle. The daily reported that
following residents' protest the town cancelled the ban.[4]
In August 2016, Hashem Safi Al-Din, chairman of Hizbullah's executive committee,
addressed the measures taken in Jebchit, 'Aitaroun and Al-Khiam in evasive
terms, saying: "Hizbullah's objective [in its activity in the] municipal
[councils] is to serve the residents while observing two boundaries: the
Lebanese law and respect for the culture [of the local] public."[5]
Shuttering Liquor Stores
In January 2017, Al-Akhbar reported that several city council members in the
town of Kafr Rumman in the Nabatiyah Governorate, all of them members of the
Shi'ite Amal movement or Hizbullah, had circulated a petition demanding to close
the town's liquor stores, and that 2,500 locals had signed the petition. In
response, the head of the governorate authorized the city council to "take
measures against the store owners." However, after council members from the
communist party and from the Al-Tali'a party – a Lebanese branch of the Al-Ba'th
party – expressed opposition to the move at a council session, and after local
residents protested against it on the grounds that it contravenes Lebanese law,
the council returned the matter to the governor.[6]
Banning Music At Public Events
The Janoubia website, known for its opposition to Hizbullah, reported on January
16, 2017 that the organizers of a memorial for Cuba president Fidel Castro that
had taken place two days earlier in Beirut had removed from the program two
interludes of lute music, and this on the insistence of Hizbullah
representatives who were invited to attend, chief among them MP Muhammad Ra'ad.
The decision infuriated some other figures who attended the ceremony, including
supporters of the Democratic Youth Union and the communist party, who left the
memorial in protest.[7]
A similar incident took place in early December 2016 at the University of
Lebanon in Beirut, when the students' council at the faculty of engineering,
whose members are Hizbullah supporters, forbade students at the faculty to play
music at a memorial for a fellow student who had been killed in a car accident.
The ceremony was to be held in the faculty forum and to include songs by famous
Lebanese singer Fayrouz that the student had loved. Hizbullah members at the
university claimed that playing the songs in public was forbidden since it would
offend the religious sensibilities of some students. They also said that they
had asked the organizers of the memorial to hold it in a closed hall but they
refused. Eventually the organizers tried to hold the memorial as planned but
students belonging to Hizbullah arrived and forcibly kept them from holding
it.[8]
Lebanese Press Slams Religious Coercion By Hizbullah: It Is An Attempt To Change
The Lebanese Way Of Life
As stated, the Lebanese press, both anti-Hizbullah and pro-Hizbullah, criticized
the religious coercion measures employed by the organization in the country.
Journalist Elie Fawwaz wrote on the NOW Lebanon website, known for its
opposition to Hizbullah: "Lebanon does not have a law banning gender mixing at
[marathon] races or anywhere else. Men and women run side by side in the annual
Beirut marathon. So on what basis did the city [councils] make this decision?
Can't they be said to have broken the law in this instance? Can't this decision
be said to contravene the [Lebanese] constitution, whose preamble states that
'Lebanon is a democratic parliamentary republic based upon respect for public
freedoms, freedom of opinion and freedom of belief, and for social justice and
equality in rights and duties among all citizens, without distinction or
preference'[?] Doesn't this preamble state that 'the people are the source of
power and sovereignty, exercising them through constitutional institutions'?...
[These incidents of religious coercion by Hizbullah] are not a temporary problem
but rather [an attempt to] change the Lebanese way of life. The sad thing is
that the state is not doing anything to decide the issue, defend the
constitution that is the basis of its power, and enforce equality among
citizens. [Rather, it] seems to accept the existence of a parallel law, just as
it accepted the existence of [Hizbullah's] parallel weapons [arsenal] and
parallel economy, and the existence of more than one governing body [in Lebanon,
i.e., the Lebanese government and Hizbullah's authorities]. This disintegration
of the state institutions will no doubt lead to social disintegration as well,
and to another crisis in addition to the crises already afflicting Lebanon."[9]
Pro-Hizbullah Daily: Hizbullah Must Stop The Mistakes Made By Some Of Its
Representatives
The daily Al-Akhbar is known to support Hizbullah's military activities as well
as its political activity in Lebanon; nevertheless, it does not always support
the organization's religious and social policies and does not hesitate to
criticize them. An example is a July 26, 2017 column by Fiyar Abu Sa'd, who
argued that Hizbullah is first and foremost a resistance organization that
defends Lebanon, and as such, it has an obligation to defend the country's
cultural diversity and promote tolerance. He stated that that moves like those
recently taken by Hizbullah in the South could alienate parts of the public that
support Hizbullah as a resistance organization but cannot accept such religious
coercion.
Abu Sa'd wrote: "The decisions of various city councils in South Lebanon
relaunched, albeit belatedly, the uneasy debate over the boundaries of social
openness and individual freedoms... among public [sectors] in which Hizbullah
has a strong presence or influence..." While noting that the decisions were made
by Hizbullah representatives in various South Lebanese towns, and not by the
organization's higher echelons, he expressed concern that they might start a
trend that would spread to other towns and villages where there are many
Hizbullah supporters, and added: "The organization [Hizbullah] must clear up the
confusion and put an end to the extremism and political mistakes made by some of
its elected representatives. Hizbullah... is at once a religious party and a
political party [operating] in a diverse society. But before anything else it is
a resistance [organization] that has achieved victories in the name of the
national [Lebanese] and pan-Arab interest, and [support for it] cuts across
sectarian and religious divisions... [Hizbullah] invested all its efforts in
fighting Israel and thereby became a model... for all other national liberation
movements in the Third World. This immense achievement has definite national and
pan-Arab implications, the most important of which is opening a window on a
future in which people will be tolerant and society will embrace [every]
individual and [also] accept women and afford them a place... Ladies and
gentlemen, Lebanon is ours in its entirety, and defending it also means
defending its shared culture, its principles, its fundamentals, and its national
laws that protect everyone and apply to everyone, regardless of sector."[10]
Another Al-Akhbar article leveled similar criticism at Hizbullah following the
incident at the University of Lebanon in Beirut. Journalist Ahmad Muhsin wrote:
"Does the so-called student's council [really] think that this is the way to
defend the resistance, Islam and the culture of the Islamic Revolution – or is
this simply a [show of] force[?] What makes the [student] council think it can
ban [people from doing things] and decide which music is appropriate and which
isn't[?]..." He added that this behavior did not typify all the Hizbullah
supporters in the university but only a group of extremists among them.[11]
[1] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), July 26, 2016.
[2] Al-Nahar (Lebanon), July 24, 2016.
[3] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), July 26, 2016.
[4] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), July 26, 2016.
[5] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), August 11, 2016.
[6] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), January 9, 2017.
[7] Janoubia.com, January 16, 2017.
[8] Lebanondebate.com, elnashra.com, December 3, 2016; Al-Akhbar (Lebanon),
December 5, 2016.
[9] Now.mmedia.me, July 27, 2016.
[10] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), July 26, 2016.
[11] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), December 5, 2016.
The Faustian pact revisited: Aoun and Haririعون والحريري واهتزازات الصفقة
By Dr. Makram Rabah/Anadolu Agencys/February
28/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=52836
Anyone who follows Lebanese politics and its seemingly countless important as
well as trivial affairs is well aware of its volatile nature as well as to the
fact that everything is possible when dealing with Lebanon and its political
class.
These developments, more often than not, are triggered by regional factors as
well as the drive of the local actors who jump on any chance to capitalize on
these situations.
The recent twist of events which led to the election of Michel Aoun to the
presidency after Samir Geagea, the leader of the Lebanese Forces and Saad
al-Hariri, the head of the Future movement both endorsed Aoun, is a case in
point.
Long considered to be their opponent, Geagea and Hariri each brokered a separate
deal with the 82-year-old former army chief who reciprocated by issuing a few
pledges which affirmed Lebanon’s neutrality amid the ongoing conflicts in the
region, especially in Syria.
In his confirmation speech Aoun, a strategic ally of Hezbollah and Bashar
al-Assad, affirmed that Lebanon’s strategic interests will always reign supreme
and that he will never allow the ongoing regional conflict to seep into the
country.
However, the alliance which brought Saad al-Hariri back as prime minister is at
risk of crumbling after President Aoun repeatedly declared the arms of
Hezbollah, Iran’s proxy militia in Lebanon, were vital for country’s protection,
taking a clear stand with the Iran-Syria axis.
As a result, Saad al-Hariri unleashed a verbal barrage declaring that Hezbollah
was merely peddling an Iranian agenda and their involvement in Syria to defend
the Assad regime was living testimony to such a claim.
Hariri’s violent comments, however, did not mention Aoun nor that by
relinquishing his customary role as an arbitrator, and siding with Iran, he was
compromising Lebanon’s standing in relation to the Arab Gulf states, especially
Saudi Arabia.
The Sunni-Shia schism and the wars in Yemen and Syria have led Saudi Arabia to
take a staunch attitude towards its own allies, who have failed on many
occasions to effectively counter Iran’s influence in Lebanon.
While Hariri has constantly denied that Saudi Arabia makes this claim, the
suspension of a $3 billion Saudi package to the Lebanese army as well as their
lukewarm reception of Aoun when he recently visited Saudi Arabia speaks volumes.
Therefore Aoun’s reckless and irresponsible -- yet calculated -- statements will
further estrange Hariri from the Saudis and might ultimately force him to walk
away from this unholy alliance and consequently the national unity government he
presides.
However, this scenario might prove more difficult given Hariri’s collusion with
Aoun and his associates over a number of domestic issues, primarily the
extraction of gas off the Lebanese coast as well as a number of other projects
of an entrepreneurial nature.
Hariri, who inherited a business as well as a political empire from his late
father, soon found himself politically outmaneuvered by his opponents and facing
financial difficulties and even alleged bankruptcy.
Consequently, according to many, Hariri’s decision to vote for Aoun was a
desperate attempt to leverage his political and financial status, something
which the premiership could possibly remedy.
These realities are equally known to Hariri’s former opponents turned allies who
recognize quite well that his ability to maneuver or truly break rank with their
alliance is a luxury he cannot truly afford.
As a result, there is nothing preventing Aoun from pursuing his adoption of the
ethos of resistance complicating matters even further for Lebanon not only with
Saudi Arabia but also with a new American administration adamant on confronting
Iran and its subsidiaries in the region.
Strangely however, Aoun’s zeal to side with Iran is not ideologically driven but
rather part of a strategy to exert internal concessions from Hariri and other
Lebanese factions to consolidate his own party’s hold over all aspects of the
state, a process which is well on its way.
Consequently, if Hariri truly intends to salvage his own career and to shield
Lebanon from the implications of Iranian hegemony, he should not allow Aoun to
extort him in this manner, nor hold the Lebanese hostage by exposing them
regionally as well as internationally.
Saad al-Hariri can continue to ignore the obvious and hide behind his pledges to
improve the economy, provide faster Internet or fix a few potholes. This,
however, will not change the fact that Lebanon is under constant threat from
Iran and their auxiliaries.
The only way going forward would simply be for Hariri as well as Geagea to show
Aoun that despite their heavy investment in his presidency, a continued breach
of their original agreement would lead to their walking out from a government
incapable of protecting Lebanon and its people.
*Opinions expressed in this piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily
reflect Anadolu Agency's editorial policy.
http://aa.com.tr/en/analysis-news/opinion-the-faustian-pact-revisited-aoun-and-hariri/761058
Geagea Urges Parliament Vote on New Electoral Law
Naharnet/February 28/17/Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea met on Tuesday with
President Michel Aoun at the Baabda Palace, and stressed that political parties
should seek a parliament vote on a new electoral law for the upcoming elections
shall they fail to agree on a consensual law to govern the polls. “Shall we
reach some kind of accord it would be fine, otherwise let the parliament play
its role and vote on a new electoral law,” said Geagea after talks with Aoun
that focused on the controversial law file. “We cannot keep the current (1960)
law,” said Geagea, “We have to either agree on a new one or head to parliament
for a vote knowing that the 1960 law is rejected.”The political parties are
bickering over amending the current election law which divides seats among the
different religious sects. On the LF's request to privatize the electricity
sector, Geagea said: “We must find quick and productive solutions. We have to
privatize the electricity sector because the results today are unacceptable and
we have to try something new. “The production and distribution of electricity is
critical and affects each and every citizen. We raised the privatization issue
to have some hope. I don't agree with those who said it requires 5 to 10 years
to finalize,” he said. “We are having discussions with all parliamentary blocs
to garner support for this proposal which provides 24/24 power supply without
imposing additional taxes, and at the same time reduces the treasury's costs,”
he concluded.
Hariri: Women's Quota Prerequisite in New Electoral Law
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/Prime Minister Saad
Hariri stressed on Tuesday that establishing a quota for women in the upcoming
parliamentary electoral law is essential, as he stressed that efforts are
pushing in that direction. “When we first launched the Ministry of Women’s
Affairs we were planning to strengthen the Lebanese society in general.
Empowering women (simultaneously) empowers Lebanon,” said Hariri from the Grand
Serail, during the launching of the Office of the Minister of State for Women
Affairs. “Our country has contributed to the development of the Human Rights
Charter, about 70 years ago, and women's rights is in its core. It is no secret
that the empowerment of women became an international standard for measuring the
progress of nations. Today, after almost 70 years, we are still late in this
measure, despite the manifestations of modernity and openness in the country,”
lamented the PM. “In Lebanon, women represent only %3 of the number of lawmakers
in the parliament. The Ministry's role is to rectify this flaw. I have
reiterated that a women's quota in one of the conditions in the new electoral
law being discussed,” stressed the PM. “I also intend to put into implementation
a previous recommendation of mine, in 2010, to include women in senior positions
and boards of directors in the State.” The Women's Affairs Ministry was first
established in 2016 under the government of Hariri. Minister Jean Oghassapian
heads the ministry.
Clashes Renew in Ain el-Hilweh after Ceasefire Collapses
Naharnet/February 28/17/Despite an evening ceasefire agreement in the southern
Palestinian refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh in Sidon, tension escalated once again
overnight and the sound of hand grenades explosions and sporadic sniper activity
were heard in the camp, the state-run National News Agency reported on Tuesday.
Tension prevailed and security breaches throughout the night were recorded where
some “seven hand grenades were tossed at al-Fawqani street and at the junction
of the vegetable market accompanied by bursts of gunfire,” said NNA. Gunmen were
on alert and were seen deployed around several streets in the camp, it added.
Meanwhile the UNRWA put on hold its educational, social and health services.
Efforts of Palestinian officials are underway to control the situation, and a
meeting will be held on Tuesday at the Palestinian embassy to study the
conditions in the camp," said NNA. The agency later reported that sniper gunfire
in al-Fawqani street has left a young boy dead and a civilian wounded on Tuesday
morning. Fierce clashes erupted Sunday between the secular Fatah Movement and a
number of hardline Islamist groups in Ain el-Hilweh. The fighting was focused on
the Sifsaf-Briksat frontier on al-Fawqani street and the sounds of machineguns
and rocket-propelled grenades echoed across the city of Sidon. Cautious calm
engulfed the camp in the evening after the national and Islamist Palestinian
factions reached a tentative ceasefire agreement under which the gunmen were
supposed to be withdrawn from the streets. The clashes had renewed earlier in
the day, leaving several people injured. The Lebanese army meanwhile closed the
Ain el-Hilweh entrance that faces Sidon's state-run hospital to preserve the
safety of passersby.
UNRWA Condemns Armed Violence in Ain el-Hilweh Camp
Naharnet/February 28/17/UNRWA strongly condemned on Tuesday the ongoing armed
violence that erupted in the Ain el-Hilweh Palestine Refugee camp in Lebanon.
Recurrent armed violence continues to impact the civilian population in the
Camp, including children, an UNRWA statement said on Tuesday. There are reports
of injuries to civilians and damage to shelters as a result of the weekend’s
clashes. An UNRWA installation is reported as sustaining minor damage and the
unauthorized entry of armed actors into one UNRWA school was reported. Due to
the violent clashes that erupted in Ain el-Hilweh and taking into consideration
security considerations, all UNRWA services were suspended yesterday and today.
On Friday, 24 February, two UNRWA facilities for health and relief services in
the Upper Street of Ain el-Hilweh were also closed due to clashes, it added.
UNRWA will continue to assess the security situation to ensure that services can
be resumed as soon as possible considering the need to ensure the safety and
security of the Agency’s personnel and beneficiaries. As a humanitarian
organization we are significantly concerned about the impact that ongoing armed
violence in Ain el-Hilweh has on beneficiaries and on safe access to UNRWA
services, including schools and vital health services. UNRWA again calls on all
those involved to ensure Palestine refugees are protected against harm in
accordance with applicable standards under international law. UNRWA also
continues to urge all armed actors to respect the inviolability and neutrality
of UNRWA premises in accordance with international law and to take all measures
necessary to ensure the safety of civilians, including UNRWA staff, the
statement concluded.
Kanaan: Wage Scale Endorsement a Political Decision
Naharnet/February 28/17/Change and Reform MP Ibrahim Kanaan stressed on Tuesday
that approving the long-stalled wage scale without making the necessary reforms
is a deception, stressing that the decision to approve it is political, the
National News Agency reported. “Approving the wage scale without introducing the
needed reforms is an attempt to cheat the people and burden them with the
policies of squandering and corruption,” said Kanaan. “The tripartite meeting I
held with (Finance) Ministers Ali Hassan Khalil and (Telecommunications) Jamal
Jarrah was devoted to legal and technical discussions on the state budget. We
made a progress, yet the implementation is up to the political parties, whereas
the approval of the wage scale happens at the parliament. Experience has taught
us that the decision on the salary scale is a political one,” Kanaan said in an
interview on NBN channel. Furthermore, the lawmaker stressed that President
Michel Aoun was determined to make reforms, as promised by the new tenure. On
the parliamentary electoral law, Kanaan said that Aoun would spare no effort to
reach a new vote that guarantees proper representation. Reiterating backing for
the Orthodox Gathering proposal, Kanaan said: “We still back the Orthodox
proposal, but we do not refuse any other suggestions.” He concluded saying: “The
1960 law is worse than extending the parliament's mandate and vacuum, and it
threatens stability.”
Kataeb Slams Govt. of 'Contradictions' for 'Tampering with
Country's Democratic System'
/Naharnet/February 28/17/The Kataeb Party on Monday lashed out anew at what it
called a government of “contradictions” over its continued failure to approve a
new electoral law. “The Kataeb Party holds the political authority responsible
for usurping the popular will and tampering with the country's democratic system
through its procrastination in producing a new electoral law,” the party said in
a statement issued after its political bureau's weekly meeting. It warned the
ruling political class against “taking the country into the unknown through its
attempt to pass one of three terrible choices: elections under the 1960 law,
extension (of parliament's term) or vacuum.”“The Kataeb Party insists on a law
that ensures correct representation and pluralism inside sects and allows
popular accountability,” it said. “Accordingly, the party is open to any draft
law that achieves this, and the best law that achieves this would be one based
on individual districts, but it also supports the one person, one vote system
and proportional representation according to the 15 districts that were agreed
on by the Christian parties in Bkirki,” Kataeb added.
Palestinian factions agree on ceasefire in Ain elHilweh
refugee camp
Tue 28 Feb 2017/NNA - The national and Islamist forces and the Palestinian
Liberation Organization factions held on Tuesday a meeting at the Palestine
Embassy, where they took up the present situation at the Palestinian refugee
camp of Ain el-Hilweh. In a statement by conferees, it said that the meeting
reached an agreement on ceasefire in the Palestinian refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh
in Sidon, and the formation of a joint committee with full powers to put the
ceasefire into effect. Palestinian Ambassador to Lebanon, Ashraf Dabbour,
attended said meeting. Conferees categorically deplored the sorrowful events in
the camp, stressing adherence to the joint Palestinian national action to
preserve the security of camps and the Lebanese neighborhood. The meeting also
stressed strengthening cooperation with the Lebanese state at the various
political and security levels, hailing the national stances by the dignitaries
of the city of Sidon calling for reinforcing security and stability of Ain
Hilweh refugee camp. Conferees underlined that "the camps shall not be a base or
a hub for any individual or group which wants to tamper with the Lebanese and
Palestinian security," reiterating that the Palestinians in Lebanon are part of
the Lebanese security and a factor of stability, peace and security." A
delegation from the Embassy is scheduled to head to the Palestinian refugee camp
of Ain el-Hilweh in order to put ceasefire into effect.
Aoun: My dream is to accomplish security, prosperity for
Lebanon
Tue 28 Feb 2017/NNA - President of the Lebanese Republic, General Michel Aoun,
said, "My dream is to accomplish security, stability and prosperity for Lebanon.
And I am rest assured about Lebanon as long as we ourselves are guiding the
boat. I want you too to be rest assured." President Aoun's stance came Tuesday
as he received at Baabda Palace a delegation of Lions clubs headed by Fady
Ghanem. "I dream of Lebanon to be - and it has been so since a very short time
ago - a region for the dialogue between religions and civilizations in the
world," said the President. Afterwards, Aoun received a delegation of Conference
of Beirut and the Coast headed by Kamal Shatila. Aoun explained to the
delegation that his main concern nowadays "is accomplishing a new electoral law
without which we won't be able to change the image of representation that we
want. And such cannot be achieved without the proportionality because if we
strive to reach political stability, all Lebanese must be represented in the
Parliament." Among Baabda's visitors had been the family of abducted press
photographer Samir Kassab, and others.
Meeting at Sidon Municipality to discuss Ain El Helwe fresh
events
Tue 28 Feb 2017/NNA - A meeting at Sidon Municipality has just started upon a
call from MP Bahia Hariri to take a unified position regarding the current
situation in Ain El Helwe refugee camp.
Ibrahim reviews with Azzam Ahmad situation in Ain Al Helwe
Tue 28 Feb 2017/NNA - General Security Director, Brigadier Abbas Ibrahim, on
Tuesday received at his office member of Fatah Movement Central Committee, Azzam
Al Ahmad, accompanied by Palestinian Ambassador Ashraf Dabbour, and discussed
with him the security situation in Ain Al Helwe camp.
Berri receives regional director for International
Organization for Migration
Tue 28 Feb 2017/NNA - House Speaker Nabih Berri on Tuesday received in Ain Al
Tineh a delegation of International Organization for Migration headed by the
regional director of said organization Carmela Godeau and discussed with her the
activities of the organization as well as the displacement crisis. Separately,
Speaker Berri received head of American University of Beirut Fadlo Khoury.
Muslim, Christian clerics convene coexistence meeting
Tue 28 Feb 2017/NNA - Top Muslim and Christian clerics from the Middle East
gathered in Cairo on Tuesday for a two-day conference on promoting co-existence,
as sectarian conflict continues to ravage the region. The "Freedom and
Citizenship" conference is hosted by Al-Azhar. It comes as Coptic Christians in
Egypt's Sinai flee attacks by Islamic State group jihadists who are waging an
insurgency in the peninsula. "Exonerating religions from terrorism no longer
suffices in the face of these barbaric challenges," Al-Azhar's head Sheikh Ahmed
Tayeb said in a speech on the opening day. Tayeb called for dispelling "the
lingering mistrust and tensions between religious leaders that are no longer
justified, for if there is no peace between the proponents of religions first,
the proponents cannot give it to the people." Coptic Christian Pope Tawadros II
called for "fighting extremist thought with enlightened thought." He said:
"Egypt and the region have suffered from extremist thought resulting from a
mistaken understanding of religion that has led to terrorism." The conference,
including Muslim muftis and Christian clergy, is to issue a closing statement on
Wednesday.--AFP
Hariri in launching office of
Minister of State for Women Affairs: The time of eliminating discrimination
against women has come
Tue 28 Feb 2017 /NNA - Under the sponsorship of the President of the Council of
Ministers Saad Hariri, the Office of the Minister of State for Women Affairs (OMSWA)
was officially launched this morning at the Grand Serail. The "Technical Support
to the Office of the Minister of State for Women Affairs" Project between the
ministry and the UNDP was also signed.
The Minister of State for Women Affairs, Jean Oghassapian, delivered the
following speech:
"We are honored today, two months after the formation of the government and the
introduction of the ministry of state for women affairs, to launch this ministry
by defining its goals and responsibilities, stressing our absolute seriousness
to improve the situation of women in Lebanon.
In fact, the establishment of a new ministry in a record time represented a
great challenge because such an establishment needs the preparation of an
infrastructure that takes into account the international standards set forth in
new ministries. We should commend, in this respect, the close follow up and
support of Premier Saad Hariri in all phases, the collaboration with the United
Nations Development Program in Lebanon, which helped to lay the foundation of
the ministry, and the cooperation with the National committee for Lebanese women
affairs and all associations and institutions concerned with women causes, to
develop a road map for the work of the ministry that covers all the gaps faced
by the Lebanese women.
Based on this, we defined the following goals: Ensure equal access of men and
women to all civil, economic, social, cultural and political rights; empower
women, enhance their potential and develop their capabilities; and integrate
women's rights in the national sustainable development process.
These goals put major responsibilities that the ministry will work to achieve
by:
1- Enhancing the participation of women in politics and decision making
positions by initially working on including a women quota in any electoral law,
and to have this quota in seats and not candidacies.
2- Empowering women and promoting their professional and financial capabilities
and eliminating unemployment and poverty
3- Eliminating violence against women through the adoption of relevant laws
4- Providing basic and continuous education
5- Ensuring equal access to health care and improving reproductive health for
women
6- Applying the principle of equality in legislative texts by amending unfair
laws against women
7- Implementing international agreements starting with the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) that aims at
eliminating all forms of discrimination against the woman, and that was ratified
by Lebanon in 1996
8- Taking the necessary steps to involve women in peace processes and protecting
them in conflicts
9- Eliminating the stereotyped images in media and advertisements
10-Supporting women's participation in environment planning and protection
11-Strengthening the capacities of the organizations working in the field of
women's rights
We also launch today the ministry's website as an essential tool to display the
strategy and the achievements of the ministry, and also for communication with
all official institutions, and local and international organizations that deal
with women affairs.
This will be the roadmap towards gender equality in Lebanon and we hope to
cooperate together to achieve it".
The UNDP Resident Representative, Philippe Lazzarini, delivered the following
speech:
"I am very pleased to be here with you today. The establishment of a ministerial
portfolio to address women affairs is a timely decision taken by Prime Minister
Hariri and his cabinet and constitutes an important development.
It comes at a time when Lebanon's women still face discrimination and
inequalities and so unfortunately still do not enjoy full and unconditional
parity. While globally the gender gap in fields such as health and education has
almost been closed, Lebanon still has to address a range of challenges related
to women's social, economic and political participation.
Despite being ahead in so many areas such as higher education, with more than
55% of female graduates, and its privileged situation compared to many Arab
counterparts, it still lags behind when it comes to gender equality. This is a
Lebanese Paradox. Allow me to provide some key examples:
Lebanese women are not entitled to the same personal status and marriage rights
as Lebanese men. Women' rights are much more restrictive in terms of divorce,
child custody, and inheritance, which are subject to decisions by the religious
courts. Equally important, and despite the Lebanese Constitution and
International commitments, Lebanese women are still unable to pass over their
nationalities to their children and foreign spouses, while men enjoy both
rights. This legislative gap not only affects the concerned women, but impacts
the entire household. Can you imagine that a boy born in Lebanon with a Lebanese
mother having been brought up in the country, cannot attend public school,
benefit from free healthcare, join the national soccer team, and later access
the job market without a permit, just because of the law?
It is also not acceptable nowadays to witness gender based violence. Every year
there is at least 15 known cases of women dying. It was not until 2014 that a
law was passed by Parliament to protect victims of violence, and we should join
efforts to follow the line of similar laws and look into enforcement mechanisms.
In the economy, Lebanese women represent only a quarter of the country's labor
force. Less than 20% of companies are owned by women, and female presence in
company boards unless family owned (or social enterprises), is almost null.
Female entrepreneurship is still relatively low. Most of women-owned businesses
in the country operate in the informal sector, and therefore it is less common
for women to access financing from banks.
The same applies to political participation, despite the fact that Lebanese
women were granted the right to vote in 1952, 20 years before my own country
(Switzerland). Lebanon has one of the lowest shares of women in parliament in
the world, with only 3.1%, compared to an average of 15% in Arab Parliaments. It
is frankly striking that such a wealth of competent and educated women is not
yet able to significantly influence public life.
Research has shown that gender equality is a stronger predictor of a state's
peacefulness than its level of democracy or gross domestic product.
Where women are more empowered, the state is less likely to experience conflict.
By investing in its peace and security agenda, Lebanon should make social,
economic, and political equality a core priority.
We are now at a cornerstone of change here in Lebanon. The new government has
made its key priority to restore trust with citizens. The ministerial statement
focused on the promotion of women role in public life and in political
participation. It also focuses on refining laws to eliminate all forms of
discrimination. To succeed in this endeavor, ensuring the adequate inclusion,
protection and representation of women will be key.
For all these reasons, the United Nations offers its technical support to the
Minister of State for Women Affairs (OMSWA). The Project Document the United
Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is signing today with the Lebanese
government represents an opportunity and an entry point for the government to
work closely with UN agencies to address technical and capacity gaps.
I am all the more happy to be present here today, as it gives me the opportunity
to make a call for action. A call for us to work together with the Government to
provide the space for Lebanese women to run for elections, by adopting as a
temporary measure a women quota. There is no reason why there should not be a
quota for women, who are the largest under-represented group. Together, we
should push for legal reforms to also ensure their active engagement in all
sectors of the economy and society. We should aim at protecting women from
violence. We should ensure proper access to health and education for all girls
and women. It is through the establishment of partnerships, and making use of
all talents and capacities that we can restore trust and create lasting change".
The UN Special Representative for Lebanon, Mrs Sigrid Kaag, delivered the
following speech:
"I have the privilege of actually being very brief, having listened to an
excellent vision statement and a plan of action by the minister and my colleague
Philippe Lazzarini. It is all about "he" for "she", and I can only congratulate
once more, President Aoun, Prime Minister Hariri for having taken the decision
to appoint a man to this ministry.
This is more than a male colleague qualified for this ministry; it is a symbol,
a signal, about men sharing the responsibility of driving change for women and
women's leadership, participation and representation in society.
Without the men and the gentlemen in the room, change will not happen,
politically, socially and at home in the family. It is a shared responsibility,
but also a shared opportunity, and it is a huge role, not only because girls do
very well in school, globally but also in Lebanon. They are tough graduates;
they are competitive, innovative, multitaskers. But in the political space, we
see that absence. You know that there are only 4 MPs to date. We have seen the
municipal elections from our perspective, supporting women's organizations,
women who have been campaigning, lobbying and training. But ultimately we only
saw 5 % of women elected in the municipal ballot. But the totality of women was
only 7% as participants. So we can do the more, the plan is very clear. Politics
at the end of the day is where decisions are made. My message is two-fold. I
would like to echo the call for action by the minister and Philippe Lazzarini.
Let's focus on the change, let's look at the parliamentary elections. We are not
sure which formula Lebanese leaders will agree on, nor which framework. But let
us make sure that women remain at the heart of whichever compromise you agree to
amongst yourself.
We will be there, supporting you through technical assistance, politically when
relevant and appropriate, and in so many ways. It is not just the quota. If the
quota will not be achieved, every party can increase the number of women on the
electoral ballot, one does not need a quota, it is a reflection of political
will.
Lebanon is not alone, my own country has elections on the 15th of March. I am
also looking at every list for where women are. Globally, everybody can do
better. But I firmly believe in Lebanon, in its diversity, in its strength,
resilience and its ability to lead the way once more, to punch above your weight
in a region that needs it so much. Lebanon can and will shine and women are part
of that picture, 50/50 , moving forward".
Prime Minister Hariri delivered the following speech:
"When we decided to dedicate a ministry of state to women's affairs in Lebanon,
we did not think of serving the Lebanese women but of serving the Lebanese
society as a whole. Empowering the Lebanese women economically, socially and
politically and removing the obstacles that stand in their way in all areas,
means in fact empowering all of Lebanon, and removing obstacles that hinder our
country, our economy and our society as a whole.
Ensuring women's right to equality in culture and education is a guarantee of
the rights of our children, grandchildren and all the generations that will
follow. When we talk about fighting the poverty of women and empowering them
economically, we would be fighting half of the poverty in our society and
achieving a big leap in the ability of our country to produce, initiate and
create jobs opportunities.
When we modernize our legislation to eliminate violence against women, we would
be eliminating half of the violence in our society, and contributing to breaking
the cycle of the other half, by diminishing the hidden violence that feeds the
violence models in the eyes of today's children, who are our future.
History recognizes that our country has contributed to writing the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, almost 70 years ago, with women's rights in its
core. It is no secret that empowering women has become one of the international
standards for measuring the advancement of nations. Today, almost 70 years
later, we remain behind in this standard, despite the aspects of modernity,
development and openness that abound in our country.
Women in our country represent 54 percent of those who belong to the level of
higher education, but they represent only 28 percent of the labor force and 3
percent of the members of Parliament. In short, the mission of the Ministry of
State for Women's affairs is to correct this imbalance, and we are committed to
support this mission.
I said on more than one occasion that I consider women's quota an essential
condition of the new electoral law that we are trying to reach. I also intend to
implement a recommendation issued during my first term as Prime Minister in
2010, to include women in senior positions and boards of directors in the state,
after this recommendation remained seven years in the refrigerator of the fear
of change and of cultural and social obstacles.
If Lebanese women, who represent half of our society and paint through their
role the form of the other half over generations, have been able to achieve
scientific, cultural and economic successes in all fields despite the
discriminatory laws, customs, traditions and legacies, then imagine what they
can achieve, what we can all achieve as a society, a state and a country, if we
cooperate to eliminate discrimination and overcome these obstacles and legacies.
This task requires us all to cooperate with this new ministry. On behalf of all
of you, I thank the United Nations Development Program, and I must thank the
National Commission for Lebanese Women, civil society and its women's
organizations on all their achievements so far. The Ministry of State for
Women's Affairs will build on these achievements in collaboration with the
Commission, civil society and all energies.
This is the greatest investment in our future. An investment requires the
mobilization of everyone. If tomorrow marks the beginning of the "Women's Month"
in the calendar of the United Nations, then the Lebanese women's time in all
fields has started in our calendar. And it is not just the time for quota, but
also for all the reforms pertaining to Lebanese women."
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News
published On March 01.17
Civilians Flee Mosul Fighting as Iraq Forces Battle IS
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/Several hundred civilians fled
through the desert on Tuesday to escape fighting against jihadists in the Mosul
area, reaching an Iraqi position south of the embattled city. At least 16,000
people have been displaced since Iraqi forces launched a push to recapture west
Mosul from the Islamic State group on February 19, according to the ministry of
displacement and migration. "So far today (Tuesday), we have around 300
displaced people -- men and women and children," Brigadier General Salman Hashem
of the Counter-Terrorism Service told AFP. "There are more coming. They're
stopped at a checkpoint when they arrive and separated. The men are searched and
then checked against a database," Hashem said. While the men are taken to be
checked, the women and children sit on sheets on the dusty ground, and security
forces bring them water, food and condensed milk. Eighteen-year-old Baidaa,
wearing a ragged black scarf and holding her young daughter, said she and her
family had fled early in the morning. We left at five o'clock this morning. We
started running and then we walked the rest of the way. We had to run because we
were afraid of fire from (IS)," Baidaa said.
"They trapped us and they didn't want us to leave," she said of the jihadists.
Her two children didn't "understand what's happening, they just followed us.
They were so afraid of the firing from the fighting."Iraqi forces backed by a
US-led coalition launched a massive operation to retake Mosul on October 17,
recapturing the city's east and then setting their sights on its smaller but
more densely populated western side.
Syria ex-Qaida Says Opposition Leaders Must 'Step Aside'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/The head of al-Qaida's former
Syrian branch said weekend suicide attacks in third city Homs were a message for
opposition figures engaged in peace talks in Geneva to "step aside". In a rare
video address released late Monday, the head of Fateh al-Sham Front reiterated
his group's responsibility for the bombings, which killed dozens of people
including a top intelligence chief and close confidant of Syrian President
Bashar al-Assad. "This operation is a lesson to the defeated politicians in
Geneva, and previously in Astana," said Abu Mohamed al-Jolani. "This lesson will
wipe off some of the shame that has followed those gambling with the lives of
the Syrian people," he said, adding that the attacks were "just one episode in a
series that will follow." Opposition and government representatives are in
Geneva this week for UN-sponsored talks aimed at ending Syria's brutal six-year
war. Fateh al-Sham has been excluded from the opposition High Negotiations
Committee (HNC), as well as previous talks in Astana between rebel groups and
the government. Jolani said the deadly attacks in Homs were a message "to leave
the war to our people, and to step aside." "It has been demonstrated to them
that this regime only understands the language of force and blood... These
politicians... are handing the regime a victory without it having to win," he
added. The Geneva talks, the fourth under UN auspices and the first since last
April, are struggling to get off the ground. The HNC is expected to meet a
Russian delegation on Tuesday, in the hope that Moscow will pressure its ally
Damascus to kickstart the negotiations. More than 310,000 people have been
killed and millions more driven from their homes since the conflict broke out in
March 2011. Fateh al-Sham Front split from al-Qaida in July 2016 from al-Qaida
in a move analysts said was an abortive attempt to end its blacklisting by the
United Nations and Western governments. In January, it joined forces with other
hardline groups to form Tahrir al-Sham. Its fighters have been targeted by
intensifying air strikes, not just by the government but also by its ally Russia
and by the US-led coalition fighting the Islamic State group. Scores of its
fighters have been killed since the start of the year.
Russia Wants Terrorism on Agenda of Syria Talks
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/Russia called Tuesday for terrorism
to be included on the agenda of UN-sponsored peace talks on Syria in Geneva,
which have been overshadowed by violence on the ground. Moscow, a key ally of
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, wants the issue added to an agenda which for
the moment focuses on three "baskets" or areas: governance, constitution and
elections. "Definitely yes," deputy foreign minister Gennady Gatilov told
reporters when asked if terrorism should be included. "Terrorism is a priority.
The fight against terrorism is a priority and it should be on the agenda, along
with other issues that were suggested that are contained in (UN Security
Council) resolution 2254," which set the terms of reference for the UN talks, he
said. The Syrian regime's delegation chief, Bashar al-Jaafari, demanded at the
weekend that all opposition factions present in Geneva condemn a suicide assault
that killed dozens Saturday near Syria's third city of Homs. The Russian
minister, speaking after meeting al-Jaafari, said Damascus wants terrorism on
the agenda of the sputtering peace talks, the first in 10 months and the fourth
round under UN auspices. Al-Jaafari "said that terrorism should not be ignored
and should be also on the agenda," said Gatilov, who is due to meet the main
opposition delegation in Geneva on Wednesday. UN Syria envoy Staffan de Mistura
launched the latest round of talks last Thursday, but as in previous sessions
there appears little prospect of the two sides meeting face-to-face. Gatilov was
cautious in his assessment of hopes for the latest Geneva talks. "Let's hope
that in this round we will be able to move forward on the path towards a
solution to the crisis in Syria," he told reporters. Asked about his planned
meeting with the opposition on Wednesday, he added: "I don't know what they are
going to insist on, that is why we are going to meet them to know their
position". Saturday's Homs attacks dealt a powerful blow to the
already-faltering talks, triggering the Damascus demand that all opposition
factions condemn terrorism. In response the main opposition High Negotiations
Committee (HNC) said its "positions are clear in condemning terrorism and
terrorists".But HNC spokesman Salem al-Meslet also accused Damascus of a
delaying tactic. "Jaafari is stalling, they don't want to start the political
transition," the HNC spokesman told AFP on Sunday.
UN Security Council to Vote Tuesday on Syria Sanctions
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/The UN Security Council will vote
Tuesday on a draft resolution that would impose sanctions on Syria for the use
of chemical weapons, diplomats said. Russia has vowed to use its veto to block
the measure, which would be the seventh time that Moscow has resorted to its
veto power to shield its Damascus ally. The vote is scheduled for 11:30 am (1630
GMT). The proposed resolution drafted by the United States, Britain and France
would slap sanctions on 11 Syrian nationals and 10 entities linked to chemical
attacks in the nearly six-year war. It would also ban the sale, supply or
transfer of helicopters and related materiel, including spare parts, to the
Syrian armed forces or the government. The proposals follows a UN-led
investigation which concluded in October that the Syrian air force had dropped
chlorine barrel-bombs from helicopters on three opposition-held villages in 2014
and 2015.The joint panel of the United Nations and the Organization for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) also found that Islamic State jihadists
had used mustard gas in an attack in 2015. Russian Deputy Ambassador Vladimir
Safronkov said Friday that Moscow would veto the measure because it was
"one-sided" and based on "insufficient proof." The Syrian government has
repeatedly denied using chemical weapons in the war that has killed 310,000
people since March 2011.
Trump Looks to Reboot in First Address to Congress
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/President Donald Trump gives his
maiden speech to Congress Tuesday, trying to boost dismal approval ratings and
flesh out his promise to help Americans left behind by a changing economy.
During a first turbulent month in office, Trump has put homeland security front
and center -- plotting immigration bans, border walls and a nearly 10 percent
increase in defense spending. But aides say his prime time address to lawmakers
and the nation at 9:00 pm (0200 GMT Wednesday) will tilt the focus back toward
the type of bread and butter issues that helped win him the presidency. "All I
can do is speak from the heart and say what I want to do," Trump told the
conservative morning show Fox & Friends, according to excerpts of an interview
to air ahead of his Tuesday address. Trump's focus will be "solving real
problems for real people" said a senior administration official, previewing an
address centered on "economic opportunity." The billionaire's tough talk and
populist economic message were crucial in his November victory over Hillary
Clinton, winning over voters in crucial rustbelt states like Michigan, Ohio and
Pennsylvania. But his White House honeymoon has been anything but. Infighting
and inexperience have dogged the new administration. Some 44 percent of
Americans think Trump is doing a good job, according to the RealClearPolitics
poll average. That is a historic low for modern presidents after a month in
office. President Barack Obama's rating on the eve of his first speech to a
joint session of Congress in February 2009 was 62 percent. Trump is likely to
use the pomp and tradition-filled occasion -- which is a State of the Union
Address in all but name -- to tout his willingness to tear up trade deals that
he claims are bad for the American worker. The CEO-turned-commander-in-chief has
already withdrawn the United States from a trans-Pacific trade pact and is
threatening to scrap a deal with Canada and Mexico if substantial changes are
not made. He is likely to claim once again credit for the rising stock market
and corporate job announcements. But many will be looking beyond the rhetoric to
what plans Trump has in store for high-stakes tax and healthcare reform. On both
issues Trump faces a difficult balancing act with fellow Republicans, who
control both the Senate and the House of Representatives. Lawmakers are sure to
offer him a warm reception but could yet frustrate his goal of swift,
far-reaching reforms. "We have a really terrific, I believe, healthcare plan
coming out," Trump assured Fox & Friends. But while reforming "Obamacare" was a
rallying cry on the campaign trail, fissures are emerging within his party.
Conservatives are desperate to pull the law out by its roots, but party
pragmatists are wary of dismantling a system that has, despite driving up costs
for many, helped some 20 million Americans obtain health insurance. The move is
appearing increasingly controversial in light of town hall meetings this past
week in which constituents expressed worry and anger to their Republican
lawmakers about the prospect of losing health coverage. "Nobody knew health care
could be this complicated," the president said Monday at a meeting with the
nation's governors at the White House.
Similarly, efforts to cut corporate taxes might only be paid for with a
contentious import tariff that might not pass muster in the Senate.
'More with less'
Tensions between the executive branch and the Republican-led Congress are also
simmering over Trump's 2018 budget proposal, which will undergo intense
negotiations in coming months as it goes from wish list to law. The White House
said Monday Trump wants to hike defense spending by $54 billion, or about nine
percent above current levels, with corresponding cuts in foreign assistance and
other non-military spending. Nonetheless, Trump will struggle to sustain
promised -- but costly -- social security spending without worsening the
country's national debt, which is set to top $20 trillion on his watch.
Democrats have been quick to accuse to Trump of favoring the rich and powerful,
despite his populist campaign message.In a "prebuttal" of Trump's speech, House
minority leader Nancy Pelosi and top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer, warned of
tough times ahead for American workers. "In future months, burden after burden
will be shifted off the special interests and onto the working people," Schumer
said. Republicans hold 52 Senate seats, compared to 48 by the Democrats, who are
pledging a united front that could slow down or even block some reform
legislation in the event some Republicans defect.
Trump Aide Conway Draws Ire for Kneeling on White House
Sofa
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/Counselor to the US president
Kellyanne Conway sparked social media fury late Monday after kneeling on a White
House sofa with her shoes on. In an image captured by an AFP photographer,
Conway appears casually kneeling on the couch as Donald Trump poses for a photo
with leaders of historically black colleges and universities. Many Twitter users
were quick to berate Conway, with many calling her body language a sign of
"disrespect." "Conway with her shoes on the couch in Oval Office -- consistent
with general level of disrespect Trump team has shown," tweeted one user. "The
new stock photo for 'white privilege,'" wrote another Twitter user of the image
which shows her surrounded by a large number of black people who are standing.
Some drew comparisons to a 2013 photo of former president Barack Obama with his
feet up on the desk of the Oval Office. "Remember when Republicans used to flip
out over Obama Oval Office decorum," posted one Twitter user. Conway recently
came under fire for plugging the fashion brand of the president's daughter. The
head of the US Office of Government Ethics urged the White House to investigate
Conway after the incident, saying she should face disciplinary action.
Israeli Police Begin Evacuating West Bank Settler Homes
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/Israeli police on Tuesday began
removing residents and protesters from nine West Bank settler homes set to be
demolished under a Supreme Court ruling. The homes in the Ofra settlement -- a
symbol of Jewish settler defiance to international concerns -- were found to
have been built on private Palestinian land and ordered razed by March 5. On
Tuesday police were entering the homes and removing young protesters one at a
time, an AFP reporter said. One youth was arrested for attacking officers,
according to a police statement. Police said they would act with restraint but
would not tolerate violence. Eight families had agreed to leave their homes
ahead of time, police said. Leaders of the Ofra community said they were intent
on preventing clashes with security forces such as those that took place during
the eviction of the nearby Amona outpost three weeks ago, where youths
barricaded themselves in the synagogue and wounded Israeli forces with stones
and acid. Amona residents announced they would begin a hunger strike on
Wednesday until the government kept its committment to build them a new
settlement. More than 400,000 Jewish settlers live in the West Bank, which
Israel has occupied since the Six-Day War of 1967. Most of the international
community sees settlements as a major obstacle to peace, as they are built on
land the Palestinians see as part of their future state.
Israel distinguishes between settlements it has authorised and those built
without permission.
Netanyahu Hits Back ahead of Gaza War Report
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu appeared on the defensive ahead of a report Tuesday expected to
criticize him and military leaders for insufficiently preparing for attack
tunnels in the 2014 Gaza war. The findings of a two-year inquiry by state
comptroller Yosef Shapira are widely expected to fault Netanyahu, then-defense
minister Moshe Yaalon and former army chief of staff Benny Gantz for poor
preparation despite intelligence warnings. The report, due to be released at
1400 GMT, is expected to say that Israel's cabinet was insufficiently briefed on
the threat posed by tunnels dug into southern Israel by Hamas, the Islamist
group that runs Gaza. Destroying the tunnels and stopping Gaza-based Palestinian
militants launching rockets into Israel were the key declared goals of Israel's
third offensive in the coastal territory in six years. The tunnels were among
the Palestinians' most effective weapons during the conflict, some used by
militants to infiltrate Israel and carry out deadly attacks there, others used
to surprise Israeli forces inside Gaza. This lack of planning left Israeli
soldiers to face a major threat without a specific plan, the 200-page report
compiled by Shapira -- who is in charge of assessing governance and use of
public funds -- is expected to conclude. Netanyahu has frequently denied such
claims, saying he regularly briefed colleagues on the situation. Speaking to his
party ahead of the report's release, Netanyahu accused Shapira of not supporting
the army.
"As opposed to the state comptroller's report, I support the heads of the
(army)," he said. "The truly important lessons aren't located in the state
comptroller's report, and we apply them without declarations and statements to
the media," he added. Analysts will be looking to see what effect, if any, the
report has on Netanyahu's rightwing governing coalition. But Avraham Diskin, a
political scientist from Jerusalem's Hebrew University, said he did not expect
any major political upheaval or resignations, noting that such inquiries rarely
have dramatic long-term impacts.
"The report won't cause an earthquake," he said. - Cabinet conflict -During the
July-August 2014 war, 74 Israelis died, 68 of them soldiers. According to the
United Nations, 2,251 Palestinian were killed. Shapira launched the probe almost
immediately after the 50-day conflict. Maariv columnist Ben Caspit said
Netanyahu's remarks constituted "incitement" against the state comptroller.
Shapira's report was "an important, in-depth and serious document," he wrote. A
"reasonable" prime minister, he added, would have accepted that while the war
achieved many of its objectives of weakening Hamas, "at the same time, there
obviously were flaws."The fallout is likely to pit Netanyahu against coalition
partner and political rival Naftali Bennett, head of the rightwing Jewish Home
party. Bennett has said that he and fellow members of the security cabinet were
not properly briefed by Netanyahu on the tunnel threat. Yair Lapid, another
political opponent who was in the 2014 security cabinet, has also criticized
Netanyahu's alleged lack of planning. Israel's military found 32 tunnels,
including 14 from the Gaza Strip into Israel, according to a UN inquiry on the
war. Hamas says it has continued to dig new ones.The ceasefire between Israel
and Hamas continues to be fractious. In the latest flare up on Monday, a rocket
fired from Gaza hit southern Israel without causing any damage. The army
retaliated by bombing Hamas targets in the Palestinian enclave.
Palestinian Municipal Elections in West Bank Only
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/Palestinian local elections
scheduled for May will take place in the West Bank only and not in Gaza, the
government announced Tuesday, scuppering hopes of the first vote in both
territories in a decade. The Palestinian Authority, run by president Mahmud
Abbas's Fatah party, sits in Ramallah in the occupied West Bank, while the
Islamist Hamas movement controls Gaza. The rival parties have not competed in an
election since parliamentary polls in 2006, which Hamas won -- sparking a
conflict that led to near civil war in Gaza the following year. "(We will) hold
the municipal elections in the West Bank on May 13 and postpone them in the Gaza
Strip," Tarek Rishmawi, spokesman for the government in Ramallah, told AFP. He
did not give a date for elections in Gaza. Civil society organisations had
attempted to find a way to hold the elections in both territories
simultaneously. Hamas said the announcement reinforced the "division" between
factions and "serves Fatah's political interests." Rishmawi, in turn, blamed
Hamas for the decision. The municipal elections are seen as a key confidence
builder which could open the way to parliamentary or presidential elections. A
previous attempt to hold a simultaneous vote in both territories collapsed last
year. The last municipal elections in 2012 were held in the West Bank only and
were boycotted by Hamas. The failure of the rival movements to reconcile is seen
as a major obstacle to any settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both
sides have voiced commitment to the principle of reconciliation but multiple
efforts at forging a unified administration have failed.
Egypt Lawmaker Says Expulsion Warning to Opposition
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/17/An Egyptian lawmaker who was one of
the few dissenting voices in parliament said Tuesday his expulsion over
accusations of leaking a draft law to foreign embassies was a warning to the
opposition. Mohamed Anwar Sadat, a nephew of the assassinated president Anwar
Sadat, was expelled in a vote on Monday for allegedly leaking the draft of a
controversial NGO law to foreign embassies. The frequent critic of the
government and parliament, which is dominated by supporters of President Abdel
Fattah al-Sisi, was also accused of forging MPs' signatures on a bill he had
presented. Sadat denied both accusations to AFP on Tuesday, saying they were "false.""I
was not surprised because I have expressed many reservations about what
parliament does and its compliance with the constitution and the law," he said.
As we see, many people are not content with the status of democracy in Egypt,"
he said. His expulsion was "a message to those inside and outside parliament:
'No one is dear to us'," he added. Elected in 2015, parliament has been accused
by critics of acting as a rubber stamp for Sisi, the former army chief who
toppled his Islamist predecessor Mohamed Morsi. Morsi's overthrow in 2013
ushered in a deadly crackdown on his supporters that killed hundreds of
protesters and left thousands in prison. Sadat had chaired parliament's human
rights committee before resigning in protest at what he called its
ineffectiveness. He had heated disputes with parliament speaker Ali Abdel Al,
who once shouted down Sadat when he inquired about military pensions for
officers who went on to lead industry and state institutions. He comes from a
prominent political family, having been named after his uncle Anwar Sadat, whom
jihadists assassinated in 1981 after he signed a peace treaty with Israel.
Saudi Analyst: Iranian Regime's Terrorism Case to Be Reviewed During Saudi
King's Asian Tour
NCRI/Tuesday, 28 February 2017 /The London-based ELAPH website wrote on February
26 on king Salman’s Asian tour “King Salman is going to describe to his Asian
friends the challenges Saudi Arabia is faced with.”ELAPH then quotes Sadigheh
Fazel, a professor of political science and former member of Saudi’s Parliament,
as saying that Salman’s Asian tour will strengthen Saudi Arabia’s position in
the world. She also believes that king Salman will probably discuss Iranian
regime’s terrorism case and its expansionist policies with the leaders of the
countries he’s going to visit. Fazel emphasizes that Salman’s visit to Malaysia
will have positive effects on the future of Saudi-Malaysia relations in
particular, and on the relations of Saudi Arabia and other Asian countries in
general. Something that will hopefully reflect well on Saudi Arabia’s position
and its political situation, particularly at a time when the region is faced
with massive political developments and unprecedented tensions. King Salman Bin
Abdulaziz arrived in Kualalumpur Sunday morning, at the start of his Asian tour
which includes Indonesia, Brunei, Japan, China, Maldives and Jordan. This is
king Salman’s first Asian tour since he came to power in January 23, 2015.
The announcement issued by the king’s office says that Saudi’s king will meet
with the leaders of the countries he’s going to visit, to discuss bilateral
relations as well as regional and international issues of mutual interest. As
for the issues of mutual interest, Sadigheh Fazel explains that “as we know,
Saudi’s king is concerned with all key issues in the region, since being at the
heart of the developments, Saudi Arabia affects and is also being affected by
them. The most important issues in this regard are fight on terrorism,
particularly what is known as ISIS, as well as Iranian regime’s expansionist
policies and its nuclear ambitions, and the turbulent political situation in
Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Libya. These issues are of importance for all these
countries as the Arabic region is a strategic area with which the whole world is
concerned.”
Iran Regime's MP: "So What? If People Are Selling Their
Kidney out of Poverty, Is It a Problem?"
NCRI Iran News/February 28/17/As a sign of disastrous living condition of the
Iranian people, The horrible phenomena of selling one’s kidney out of poverty,
is wide spreading on daily basis. On Monday February 27, Hossein Ali Shahriari,
Regime’s MP from Southeastern city of Zahedan stated in this regard in an
interview with state run ‘Shafa online’, that if a poor person is selling his
kidney for $5000 – 8000 and has a change in his living condition, so what? Is
there anything wrong with it? He further added: “some people need kidney to
continue their lives, some people are living with one kidney, and there are no
side effects for it!”It is worth mentioning that while the massive wealth of Ali
Khamenei and other senior officials of the Iranian regime and the theft of
billions of dollars by those affiliated to the regime are subject of talk all
over Iran, the number of people resorting to selling their organs to make ends
meet in Iran under the mullahs’ regime is escalating significantly. While
selling blood, kidneys and livers is now common in Iran, currently this market
is witnessing a growing trend of human eyes being placed for sale, reports
indicate. Deprived people that literally cannot make ends meet for themselves or
their family due to extreme poverty and unemployment have no other choice but to
sell their organs at risk to their health. “Seventy percent of all kidney
transplants in Iran were from living individuals, whereas in other countries
across the globe this rate is only 15%,” admitted Mohammad Reza Ganji, head of
the Iranian regime’s nephrology Association.“New market for buying and selling
eyeballs”, “Kidneys for sale with discount”, “Kidneys for sale, AB+, 18 year
old”, “Liver for sale, O-, 23 year old”, and “bone marrow for sale, B-, 54 year
old” are just some of the writings advertising organ sales on the Internet and
on walls in cities across Iran.
The mullahs’ regime does not impose restrictions on living individuals selling
their organs and has in fact made this a tool for embezzling the deprived people
of Iran. A large number of websites and blogs launched for this very cause are
actually encouraging this viciousness and evil trade.
These developments are taking place as mullahs are allocating billions of
dollars of the Iranian people’s wealth for the export of terrorism and
fundamentalism and warmongering across the region, especially in Syria, Iraq,
Lebanon and Yemen to maintain this repulsive regime in power in any way
possible.
Former Iranian Regime's MP Acknowledges Country's Deadly
Recession
NCRI Iran News/February 28/17/ Commenting on why 38 years after the revolution
there’s still poverty and prostitution, former Iranian regime’s MP Alireza
Zakani said in a conference held at the Rajayee Teacher Training University
“there is a deadly recession in the country. Our economic problem is the issue
of unemployment. Unfortunately some (regime’s officials) are not willing to
work, and they don’t believe they should look for solutions within the country,
either”, according to state-run ‘Javan Online’ news agency February 26. “20
billion dollars of smuggled goods come into the country each year. With each one
billion dollars, nearly one hundred thousand jobs are gone, meaning that if
there’s a will to fight smuggling, one to two million jobs could be created in
the country. Smuggling is not carried out by back-packs and small boats, but it
is done through the country’s official entry points”, said Zakani. On the issue
of nuclear deal, Zakani said “some promises were made in the deal. It was
supposed to remove the shadow of war, but it did not. Also sanctions were
supposed to be lifted, but it didn’t happen, either. It’s been said recently
that instead of keeping 300 kg of enriched uranium, only 100 kg is remaining in
the country.”
Pointing to the regime’s poor budgeting system, saying “I was in the Parliament
for 12 years. All the budgeting process was done by one person. Our budgeting
system is a black box.”It is noteworthy that Iran regime’s Revolutionary Guards
Corps (IRGC) is heavily involved in all abovementioned elements in Iran’s
economy, the Guards have gradually built up a gigantic business empire in
various sectors of the Iranian economy, and from humble beginnings in the
construction trade, they now dominate several lucrative industries. Through a
myriad of holding companies, front companies and so-called “charitable
foundations”, the IRGC run their huge business domain. Having used these
organizations to work around international sanctions imposed on the country,
through its refusal to allow International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
inspections of its nuclear facilities, the Guards have become very adept in the
workings of the black economy, using its control of customs and excise and the
docks, to set up a substantial smuggling network. Such is the scope of the
Guards enterprises, they have also ventured into the lucrative oil and gas
sectors, moved into the production of consumer goods, car manufacturing, the
import-export industry, telecommunications, and black market smuggling. Just
like the American Mafia, the Guards have built up varied routes to smuggle
goods, and are said to be in control of a string of jetties on the southern
Iranian island of Qeshm, situated in the strategic Strait of Hormuz at the mouth
of the Gulf Coast.
The Guards also have the use of terminals at Iranian airports, to enable members
of their vast workforce to fly their illicit goods in and out of the country
unchecked, and whichever route they use, they are guaranteed to avoid having to
pay any form of export or import duties.
Operating what has become a powerful criminal empire, the Guards have long been
involved in the black market, and by shipping in and out of the country various
illegal goods, which includes vast caches of weapons, they have built up a
highly lucrative business. The Guards also have a large stake in the illegal
drugs industry, using the vast drugs network setup by Hezbollah, which enables
the IRGC Qods Force to deal with various major players throughout the world.
When you consider that sales of illegal drugs in Iran is around $3 billion per
year, with the Qods Force said to be taking a sizeable cut, through the running
of many of the routes in and out of the country, as well as having contacts with
drug smuggling gangs in Afghanistan, and also South America through Hezbollah,
their wealth is vast through this alone. So it isn’t surprising that the US
Department of the Treasury had placed Qods Force Commander Gholamreza Baghbani
on the US sanctions list, accusing him of being a narcotics kingpin. Over the
years, various ex-members of the IRGC, who now live in exile, have made highly
credible claims, on how the corps they had served in for many years, had been
dealing in vast amounts of illegal drugs, and that the global network it was
running, was bringing in billions of dollars, which would then be used to pay
for terrorist activities carried out by the Qods Force across the globe.
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from
miscellaneous sources published
On March 01.17
Bishop Angaelos:
Christians In Egypt Told To 'Leave Or Die', 40 Killed In 3 Months, Prays For
ISIS
Joseph Hartropp/Christian
Today/February 28/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=52850
As Coptic Christians continue to flee for their lives from the threat of ISIS in
Egypt, the head of the Coptic Church in the UK has called out the 'horrific
attacks' that have claimed 40 Christians in the last three months. His Grace
Bishop Angaelos, General Bishop of the Coptic Orthodox Church in the United
Kingdom today released a statement addressing the ongoing crisis. He said: 'In
the past three months alone forty Coptic Christians have been murdered in
targeted attacks in Egypt. From the terrorist bombing on St Peter's Coptic
Church in Cairo that claimed the lives of twenty nine mainly women and children,
to the murders of individuals across the country since, the one common
denominator is that these innocent children, women and men have had their lives
brutally and tragically ended for no other reason except that they are
Christians.
'Incitement by terrorist groups that calls for the killing of Christians in
Egypt has spiralled over the past weeks to the extent that lists of churches and
individuals have now been released as desirable targets.'Attacks have escalated
in recent weeks following the release of an ISIS video which incited fellow
jihadists to target the 'infidel' Christian community. Hundreds have now fled
from El-Arish in Sinai, Northern Egypt, and as His Grace told Christian Today
yesterday, specific lists of Christian targets have been circulated among
militants. 'These horrific attacks have gone largely unnoticed by the
international community, but Copts continue to suffer tragic violations daily.
The attacks against them are anti-Christian and religiously-motivated,
demonstrated in many cases by the circulation of flyers within villages urging
Christians to 'leave or die'.
'Similar events have tragically occurred far too often over the past years, and
there is unfortunately little deterrent to prevent them from reoccurring.'
Angaelos added: 'In our fast moving world that is filled with so much news of
tragedy, war and death, it is all too easy for atrocities to become 'incidents',
and for individuals suffering them to become mere statistics, very quickly
pushed aside by the next item of news. 'In the eyes of the perpetrators they are
a viable target, and in the eyes of the world they become a regrettable
phenomenon; yet what is actually left behind is traumatised individuals,
families and communities that have lost loved ones, living the reality of
themselves being targeted.' The bishop highlighted the resilience of the
community that has remained steadfast, and forgiving to its persecutors, despite
constant opposition. He said: 'After the destruction of over 100 places of
Christian ministry and worship in August of 2013, the bombing of various
churches across the country in the last decade, and the targeted killing of
clergy, families, women and children, purely for their Faith, the community and
individuals within it remain non-violent and resilient.'Coptic Christians
represent about 10 per cent of Egypt's majority Muslim population. Angaelos
added that Christians have not been the only target, noting that 'scores of
Egyptian civilians, soldiers and police officers have lost their lives as a
result of this wave of terrorist activity'.The prelate concluded: 'we pray for
those who perpetrate these crimes, that they once again become conscious of the
true value of every life that appears to be dispensable in their eyes'.
What to Remember in Fighting Radical
Islam
Saied Shoaaib/Gatestone
Institute/February 28/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=52833
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9952/fighting-radical-islam
In every Muslim-majority country, especially in the Middle East, the Islamic
terrorist genie came out from under the ashes, built the Islamic state and
threatened the West -- both with terrorist operations and from inside, in a more
surreptitious, seemingly peaceful manner, as the Muslim Brotherhood does.
It is important to understand that Islam is a religion that includes, in its
structure, political power that governs and controls and spreads the force of
arms.
US President Donald J. Trump has succeeded in naming a jihadi problem, political
Islam, but it is hard to single out defective products from the factory without
closing the factory -- if one does not want them to appear again.
This does not mean that what Trump intends to do is not important; on the
contrary, we need him after most Western politicians faced Islamic terrorism
awkwardly, if they faced it at all. Sometimes they even cooperated with these
terrorist organizations, invited their members to the White House; to Iftar
dinners during Ramadan, and hugging what they falsely call "moderate Islam" --
especially the Muslim Brotherhood, the incubator that most terrorist
organizations come out of -- instead of the true "moderate Muslims" who have
been struggling to be heard above the crush of "influence," infiltration and
petro-dollars.
We can say that so far "Trumps's recipe" for facing radical Islam had been tried
before and failed. Dictatorships and military regimes in the Middle East, such
as the presidents of Egypt Nasser, Sadat and Mubarak, and now el-Sisi, faced
political and radical Islam. Russia did, and Saddam did in Iraq, Gaddafi in
Libya, Bourguiba in Tunisia and others.
Perhaps the saddest failure is the Turkish model. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk built a
dictatorship-state on the ruins of the Ottoman Empire. He decisively confronted
all forms of political Islam, and destroyed the military wing of the army that
dreamed of restoring that Empire. Atatürk founded a dictatorship guarded by the
army's broad powers, but within a constitutional and legal framework, to deter
Islamists who might want to change his modernist structure. It was also meant to
stop any move to Islamic rule that might want to change the relatively open and
pro-Western ideas of the Kemalist Republic.
Atatürk dominated the religious institutions, and made them work for him; they
gave him a legitimate Islamic platform. He wanted Islamic culture to prevail,
but under his control.
Unfortunately, this model also failed. Turkey's current president, Recep Tayyip
Erdogan, prosecuted the leaders of the army with trumped-up testimony; lowered
the retirement age of the judiciary to force them out; fired educators, jailed
journalists is building his Islamic state step by step.
Many Western politicians have cooperated with Islamists and Islamist
organizations. (Image source: RT video screenshot)
In every Muslim-majority country, especially in the Middle East, the Islamic
terrorist genie came out from under the ashes, built an Islamic state and
threatened the West -- both with terrorist operations and from inside, in a more
surreptitious, seemingly peaceful manner, as the Muslim Brotherhood does.
Most of those who fought Islamic terrorism focused their efforts on the hunt for
dangerous products from the factory of Islamic ideology, such as Anwar al-Awlaki
or Osama bin Laden. This is important, but no one tried to shut down and destroy
the factory itself.
Perhaps we remember that the West, in the fight against the ideology of
communism, used weapons only rarely. The major part of the fight was against the
ideology itself: encouraging and supporting its opponents, and disseminating
ideas to counter those the Communists were exporting. There was a focus on the
disadvantages of Communist ideology, such as oppression, tyranny and human
rights violations. And suddenly the world woke up one day to find the Soviet
Empire collapsed from inside.
We need from the West a positive energy to rebuild the civilization after the
destructive energy that hollowed it out. And we need to dismantle the prevailing
Islamic ideology that produces terrorism.
It is important to understand that Islam is a religion that includes, in its
structure, political power that governs and controls and spreads the force of
arms. First the Islamic prophet Muhammad published his call peacefully for
nearly 13 years in Mecca, when the Quran verses called for tolerance, freedom of
belief and other human values. But then Muhammad and some of his companions
moved to the city of al-Madina and turned religion into a political authority
aiming to expand and defend itself. It entered into a political and military
struggle against its opponents within al-Madina and outside, especially with his
tribe of Quraish.
At that time, Muhammad established what we might call political Islam. It was
based on a new call: that Islam was no longer interested in the relationship
between the individual and his God, as well as a good relationship with those
around him, whether they agreed with his religious faith or not.
He turned the religion into a ruling political organization, undertaking to
control -- religiously, politically, socially and economically -- Muslims and
others. It builds on the culture of the tribe, spreads the force of arms and
increases its numbers and the territories governed by them.
It became the religion of loyalty -- meaning loyalty to the governor and
vice-versa.
This structure continued after the death of Muhammad. Many ruled out of Quraish,
the most prominent Turks, Al-Othmanin and the Ottoman Empire that expanded
through force of arms to Persia; swept away the Christian Byzantine Empire;
conquered by force North Africa, the Middle East, Greece, Spain and Eastern
Europe
During this long history was established the Islamic culture that now prevails
among the millions of Muslims in all corners of the world. It was founded on the
sacred religious texts: the verses of the Quran and hadiths (the Prophet's
biography). Add to this a religious jurisprudence established during this
imperial tide that swept the world. All of this, ordinary Muslims imprison
inside them, unhappy. Some of them become potential soldiers for terrorist
organizations and all varieties of political Islam.
This culture, prevalent in the West, is backed by money from Saudi Arabia and
the Gulf States, especially Qatar, and often backed by money from the West
itself -- along with many politicians, often opportunistic.
What is the solution? From within. Islamic political power controls the Islamic
world, whether military or in an everyday dictatorial form.
Religious reform in Islam did not find support, as it did in the West. What does
Trump need to do? There needs to be a stop to any form of cooperation with the
varieties of political Islam and certainly the terrorist organizations.
Add to that: Dismantle the ideology that produces Islamic terrorism by
supporting the disintegration of the ideology of terrorism through Islamic
jurisprudence, Islamic schools, mosques, books, radio stations and television
stations. Dry up the external financing and private Saudi and Gulf Islamic
institutions in the West. And thus give to the Muslims what is normal in the
West. We need to promote other Islamic religious choices, completely out of the
ideology of the Islamic terrorist prison, and to encourage being part of the
building and development of human civilization rather than the cause of its
destruction.
**Saied Shoaaib is a Muslim scholar based in Canada. He can be reached at:
saiedshoaaib@gmail.com
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Europe: Laughing at the Messenger
Douglas Murray/Gatestone Institute/February 28/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9988/sweden-trump
Once again, an American has pointed to a failing in European society, and
instead of focusing on the problem identified or even admitting that there is a
problem, the European response has been to point at the American and blame him
for creating the problem he has in fact merely identified.
We are being given an accurate representation of a serious problem.
If the response to every problem is denial, and the response to anyone pointing
to the problem is opprobrium, legal threats or hilarity, it suggests that Europe
is not going to make the softer-landing it could yet give itself in addressing
these issues.
It might make us feel better, but every time we attack or laugh at the
messenger, rather than addressing the message, we ensure that our own future
will be less funny.
How can one excavate the minds of so many European officials and the
extraordinary mental gymnastics of denial to which they have become prone?
One of the finest demonstrations of this trend occurred in January 2015, after
France was assailed by Islamist gunmen in the offices of the satirical magazine
Charlie Hebdo and then in a Jewish supermarket. In the days after those attacks,
Fox News in the U.S. ran an interview with a guest who said that Paris, and
France, as a whole, had "no-go zones" where the authorities -- including
emergency services -- did not dare to go. In the wake of these comments, the
Mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, chose to make a stand. She announced that she was
suing Fox News because the "honour of Paris" was at stake.
It appeared that Mayor Hidalgo was rightly concerned about the image of her city
around the world, presumably worrying in particular about the potential effects
on tourism.
Of course, Mayor Hidalgo's priorities were all wrong. The reason Paris's public
relations suffered a dent was not because of what a pundit said on Fox News one
evening, but because of the mass murder of journalists and Jews on the streets
of the "City of Light." Any potential tourist would be much more concerned about
getting caught up in a terrorist firefight than a war of words. Mayor Hidalgo's
manoeuvre, however, turned out not to be a rarity, but a symptom of a wider
problem.
Consider the almost precise replay of that 2015 episode after U.S. President
Donald Trump referred in a speech to "what's happening last night in Sweden."
Much of the press immediately seized the opportunity to claim that Trump had
asserted that a terrorist attack had occurred the night before in Sweden. This
allowed them to laugh at the alleged ignorance of the president and the alleged
concoction of what has become known as "fake news." Except that it swiftly
became obvious to anyone who cared that what the president was referring to -- a
documentary film about the situation in Sweden that had aired the night before
on Fox News -- showed the extent of the lawlessness in parts of Sweden. While
every authority in Sweden was laughing at Donald Trump, a day after his
comments. residents of Rinkeby, a suburb of Stockholm, obligingly had a
car-burning riot and attacked police.
The troubles that Sweden has gone through in recent years, since mass migration
began in earnest, are hard indeed to ignore. These troubles include the setting
up of what the American scholar of Islam, Daniel Pipes, most accurately referred
to as "semi-autonomous sectors." Although non-Muslims can enter, the areas are
different from the rest of the country. These are areas where, for instance,
police, fire and ambulance services refuse to enter because they and other
authority figures representing the state frequently come under attack. The
filmmaker, Ami Horowitz, experienced the downside of some of these areas. On a
recent visit to Sweden he was attacked for taking a film crew into a suburb of
Stockholm when some of the locals objected. We are being given an accurate
representation of a serious problem.
Car-burnings and riots do break out in Sweden today with considerable
regularity, and sexual assaults have sky-rocketed in the country (although these
figures are the subject of heated debate over whether they represent a rise in
incidents or a rise in reporting). Either way, rapes carried out by immigrants
remain a real and underreported issue. The authorities – including the Swedish
media – have refused to run stories about these unpleasant facts.
In Sweden, more than in perhaps any other European country, the media is
homogenous in its support for the left-wing status quo in the country, and this
includes a support for the views of recent governments on immigration policy.
Anything which could give ammunition to critics of that policy is -- as in
Germany -- deliberately underreported or actively covered over by the majority
of the media.
The response to Trump's comments unfortunately demonstrated this yet further.
The desire to pretend that the president had specifically claimed that there had
been a terrorist attack the night before was one trick. Another was to simply
mock and belittle him and his claims. Former Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt
took to Twitter to say, "Sweden? Terror attack? What has he been smoking?" The
European press gleefully took up tweets by members of the Swedish public who
responded to Trump's claims by sending photos of people putting IKEA furniture
together. A joke which would have been funnier had a failed asylum seeker from
Eritrea not stabbed and killed a mother and son in an IKEA store in Västerås in
2015. Elsewhere, the present Swedish foreign minister, Margot Wallström, in her
familiar preaching tones announced that diplomacy and democracy "require us to
respect science, facts and the media."
In response to US President Donald Trump's recent reference to "what's
happening" in Sweden, Swedish Twitter users mocked him by posting photos of
people putting IKEA furniture together. The joke would have been funnier had a
failed asylum seeker from Eritrea not murdered Carola Herlin (left) and her son
in an IKEA store in Västerås, Sweden, in August 2015.
So, once again an American has pointed to a failing in European society, and
instead of focusing on the problem or even admitting that there is a problem,
the European response has been to point at the American and blame him for
creating the problem he has in fact merely identified. Such behaviour is a
psychological affliction before it is a political one. It must stand somewhere
along the continuum of the famed stages of grief. But it bodes exceptionally
poorly for Europe's future. If the response to every problem is denial, and the
response to anyone pointing to the problem is opprobrium, legal threats or
hilarity, it suggests that Europe is not going to make the softer-landing it
could yet give itself in addressing these issues. It might make us feel better,
but every time we attack or laugh at the messenger, rather than addressing the
message, we ensure that our own future will be less funny.
*Douglas Murray, British author, commentator and public affairs analyst, is
based in London, England.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Time to Put an End to Montenegro's Bid to Join NATO
Grégoire Canlorbe/Gatestone Institute/February 28/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9993/montenegro-nato
According to a 2016 investigation by Balkan journalists Marko Vesovic, Vladimir
Otasevic and Hasan Haydar Diyab, the Montenegrin government is indirectly
involved in the funding of Islamic terrorism.
Charges were dropped due to former PM and President Milo Đukanović's diplomatic
immunity, but not before he admitted his involvement in the criminal enterprise.
In other words, while Đukanović was signing the accession protocol with NATO,
boatloads of illegal cigarettes from Montenegro were apparently making their way
into ISIS-controlled areas.
For all his talk of rethinking America's foreign commitments, it appears that
President Donald Trump has also made the decision to endorse Montenegro's
membership bid.
While Đukanović stepped down in October in favor of Duško Marković, a former
intelligence chief and a close ally, he is widely believed to be the power
behind the throne and to be planning a comeback in the 2018 presidential
elections.
Between its apparent links to the funding Islamic terrorism, its flawed
democracy, and its still-insufficiently developed army, Montenegro is not yet a
reliable partner for the West.
Does a country involved in financing Islamic terrorism deserve to be invited to
join the world's biggest military alliance, and receive all the perks that come
with it? Many may argue this is the case with the small Balkan state of
Montenegro, whose NATO membership will soon be taken up for consideration by the
U.S. Senate.
According to a 2016 investigation by Balkan journalists Marko Vesovic, Vladimir
Otasevic and Hasan Haydar Diyab, the Montenegrin government is indirectly
involved in the funding of Islamic terrorism. More precisely, between 2013 and
2015, 3.5 million kilograms of cigarettes were illegally delivered from the
Montenegrin port of Bar to Libyan areas under the control of terrorists close to
al-Qaeda and ISIS. And such a movement of cargo would not have been possible,
they claim, without the explicit endorsement of high-ranking Montenegrin
officials. According to Vesovic, in an interview with Sputnik News, the former
Montenegrin prime minister and president Milo Đukanović, who kept himself in
power for the past quarter of a century (until 2016), would be himself a case in
point.[1]
As revealed by Italian prosecutors in 2001, it seems that Đukanović was involved
in the smuggling of cigarettes around the Adriatic by Italian crime syndicates
in the 1990s. Charges were dropped due to Đukanović's diplomatic immunity, but
not before he admitted his involvement in the criminal enterprise. According to
Vesovic:
"The same Montenegrin elite is (now) involved in a very complex system of
organized crime, based on the smuggling of cigarettes to North Africa. In the
1990s they were smuggled to Italy.... Now, as we see, they found a new market."
In other words, while Đukanović was busy signing the accession protocol with
NATO in May 2016, boatloads of illegal cigarettes from Montenegro were
apparently making their way into ISIS-controlled areas. Shortly thereafter,
Đukanović was greeted by then US President Barack Obama in New York and praised
for his country's progress. For all his talk of rethinking America's foreign
commitments, it appears that President Donald Trump has also made the decision
to endorse Montenegro's membership bid, according to the Wall Street Journal.
While then Prime Minister Milo Đukanović of Montenegro (sitting behind the
table, at right) was busy signing the accession protocol with NATO in Brussels
on May 19, 2016, boatloads of illegal cigarettes from Montenegro were apparently
making their way into ISIS-controlled areas. (Image source: U.S. State
Department)
As noted by political commentator Guy Millière, Trump is the first American
President explicitly to designate militant Islam as a main enemy. He has
constantly repeated his determination to eviscerate ISIS and to break with the
complacency of his predecessor on this issue. In this regard, it seems that
Montenegro's admission to NATO would be problematic.
Moreover, many Montenegrins have not forgiven the Western military alliance for
some of its actions during the Kosovo War, including the 1999 bombing campaign
that targeted Serbia and Montenegro. That memory explains why an opinion poll
conducted in December 2016 found that only 39.5% of Montenegrins were in favor
of NATO membership while 39.7% opposed it, with the remaining 20% undecided.
Other opinion polls have produced similar results. Đukanović and his party might
be prepared to drag Montenegrins kicking and screaming into NATO, but how
committed an ally can it be?
Meanwhile, an argument has been invoked among officials from NATO and Montenegro
to justify its admission: the geopolitical interests of the United States and a
set of shared core values: the Western ones of "democracy, individual liberty,
and the rule of law," to quote Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Michael R.
Carpenter.
The geopolitical argument is implicitly premised on the so-called "Brzezinski
Doctrine." Brzezinski himself, however, pointed out in 2016 that the strategy of
dividing Eurasia at any cost failed, in that it did precious little to strip
Russia of its influence while at the same time only heightening bilateral
tensions.
Another problem is that the Montenegro's rule of law seems to leave much to be
desired. According to Freedom House's 2016 survey, Amnesty International reports
from 2015/16, or the 2015 edition of the Annual Country Reports on Human Rights
Practices of the State Department, Montenegro can be described as an autocracy,
stifling freedom of the press and freedom of expression, and with deep
connections to organized crime. The October 2016 parliamentary elections were
controversial, and the process was perceived as deeply flawed: messaging apps
were blocked, mobile phone services broke down, and multiple instances of
ballot-stuffing and physical abuse were reported.
Allegations by Đukanović that there was a supposed coup attempt against him were
rejected by the opposition, who suspected the supposed attempted coup was
actually a "false-flag" operation used by Đukanović to discredit his political
rivals in the past. While Đukanović stepped down in October in favor of Duško
Marković, a former intelligence chief and a close ally, he is widely believed to
be the power behind the throne and to be planning a comeback in the 2018
presidential elections.
Taken together, these factors seem to leave the case for Montenegro joining NATO
considerably thorny. As Doug Bandow, former special assistant to Ronald Reagan,
summed it up: "Whatever Podgorica's virtues, reflecting the best of the West is
not one."
Between its apparent links to the funding Islamic terrorism, its flawed
democracy, and its still-insufficiently developed army, Montenegro is not yet a
reliable partner for the West.
*Grégoire Canlorbe, a journalist, currently lives in Paris.
[1] Sputnik News has an obvious pro-Putin bias, but here, it is referenced ONLY
to quote the journalist, and it's the quote and the investigation that are
relevant.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
تصاعد حملات استهداف واعدامات الشباب في إيران
Rise in Executions and Crackdown Against Iran's Youth
NCRI/Tuesday, 28 February 2017
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=52830
Executions and crackdown against Iran’s youth is increasingly on the rise. Many
inmates in their 20’s and 30’s have been executed or killed during the past
months, while hundreds have also been arrested or mistreated. Wrote Donya Jam in
‘News Blaze’ on February 26, 2017.
Dozens of prisoners have been hanged during the first two weeks of February,
including a mass execution of 12 prisoners in Gohardasht Prison, west of Tehran,
on Feb. 15. 13 inmates, including prisoners aged 29 and 30, were executed
between Feb. 11-13 in the prisons of Qom, Zabol, Jiroft and Mashhad.
On Jan. 29, regime authorities publicly executed four prisoners in the cities of
Bandar Abbas and Mashhad. These prisoners were all in their early to mid 20’s.
Reports indicate 87 inmates were sent to the gallows in the month of January
alone. Many of those executed never received due process and some were hanged
while their cases were still open.
Hamid Ahmadi, a juvenile offender, has also been reported to be at imminent risk
of hanging. The United Nations and prominent human rights organizations such as
Amnesty International have been campaigning to halt his execution. 160 juveniles
are on death row in Iran, according to the United Nations. The number, however,
could be higher.
On Feb. 9 in Shadegan (Khuzestan Province in southwest Iran), state security
forces shot and killed a young Iranian-Arab man named Hassan Ablu Ghabish.
Alongside hangings and killings, regime authorities are also continuously
arresting and attacking youths for absurd reasons.
In Shiraz, a teenage girl celebrating her birthday along with friends was
brutally beaten and arrested for wearing ripped jeans. Two young women were
arrested in Dezful for riding a motorcycle. And hundreds have been arrested
between 2016 and January 2017 for attending mixed-gender parties. In some
instances, the regime has also brutally punished the arrestees.
Back in May 2016, Iranian authorities arrested and flogged 30 students for
attending a mixed-gender graduation party. Their flogging sentence was
implemented within 24 hours of their arrest. Each student received 99 lashes.
Imprisonment for attending mixed-gender parties continues. It was reported on
Jan. 28 that another 13 boys and girls were arrested in Gilan Province, northern
Iran.
One may ask why is the regime increasingly targeting youths? If we recall the
2009 nationwide anti-government uprising in Iran, the youth took the forefront
of the demonstrations. They played one of the most significant roles throughout
the protests. Therefore, the regime is using suppression as a method to spread
fear in society in order to prevent the youths from uprising.
And part of the reason why the regime is heavily cracking down on parties and
get-togethers is because they fear people’s gatherings could turn into
anti-government uprisings. The regime is doing everything in its power to
prevent a reoccurrence of the 2009 demonstrations.
Now that reform in Iran has been proven to be nothing but a myth, another
question that may be asked is what is the true solution to bring an end to the
suffering of Iran’s youth? This is where Iranian youth activists want their
voices heard by the international community. They want to see an end to deals
and negotiations with the regime, and instead yearn for the international
community to recognize the Iranian people’s aspirations for freedom and
democracy.
Sourosh Abouthalebi, an Iranian student in Belgium majoring in political
science, expressed his deep concern about the executions. He called on the
international community to end economic deals with Iran because the continuation
of such agreements signals to the regime’s leaders to carry on with their human
rights violations.
“Trading with this regime without raising any human rights concerns is perceived
as a green light by this regime for even more executions,” he said.
Abouthalebi added that countries should instead support the Iranian people.
“Each country has a unique opportunity to place itself alongside the Iranian
people. Iranians will never forget those that have stood up for the rights of
the Iranian people during the darkest period of Iran’s history,” he concluded.
Afshin Motevalli, an Iranian student studying pedagogy at the University of Oslo
said the international community should end relations with Iran.
“I ask the international community to stop the appeasement vis-a-vis the Iranian
regime. The regime in Iran gives nothing back to its people nor the
international community other than terrorism, suppression, executions, and
destruction,” he said.
Motevalli also mentioned that the world community should support regime change
in Iran by the people and their resistance movement, the People’s Mojahedin
Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK).
“The international community should support the Iranian opposition National
Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), as well as the millions of men and women
in Iran longing for freedom and democracy,” Motevalli added.
“Regime change is the only method to end suppression, torture and executions,
and regime change is the only path to democracy, equality, freedom and harmony,”
he finalized.
Iran’s youth are oppressed. They yearn for freedom and justice. The only way to
bring an end to the executions and suppression of youth is through democratic
regime change. Therefore, the international community should end all deals with
Iran and instead support the Iranian opposition PMOI/MEK and people in their
plight to establish freedom. This is the only way to put an end to the injustice
and the only way the youth of Iran can be guaranteed a brighter, safer and
hopeful future.
*Ms. Donya Jam is an Iranian-American Christian and human rights activist. She
holds a bachelor’s degree in political science from Shenandoah University.
Iraq and Syria, post ISIS
Sawsan Al Shaer/Al Arabiya/February 28/17
With a new American administration in place an idea has begun to crystallize in
the war against ISIS. This idea is not limited to deploying helicopters and
artillery in Raqqa and Mosul and empowering the presence of special forces but
also includes forming a US-Gulf front that contributes to fighting ISIS on
condition that the areas liberated from ISIS are not occupied by Iran or
militias affiliated with it. This is the major point concluded by the Moscow
document and the US Secretary of Defense James Mattis’ visit to the Gulf and
Iraq. So there’s a US-Russian-Turkish-Gulf agreement to end the Iranian
expansion in Arab capitals. We must be clear regarding this point if the world
wants our cooperation to eliminate ISIS. In exchange for any Gulf or Arab
contribution in the war against ISIS, whether in Iraq or Syria, Iran must be
outside these areas. This message must be clear to the Iraqi government. Mattis
said that the US will continue to support Iraq even after it liberates it from
ISIS. If we link this stance to Mattis’ stance on Iran, as a state that sponsors
terrorism, we will realize we are before a united front that does not only
insist on the exit of Iranian forces from Iraq and Syria but that also wants to
end Iranian influence in them. This message is conveyed by both, Gulf countries
and the US. Establishing a US-Gulf front is the headline of the next phase. It
carries the slogan of the Arabism of the lands liberated from ISIS. It is soon
that the world will clearly know who supports terrorism and helps ISIS stay and
who really wants to get rid of it or use it an excuse to expand. If Iraq wants
Gulf countries to support its security and stability by cooperating with the US,
it must act to address the security chaos caused by Iranian militias on its
land. The exit of foreign forces and militias supported by Iran from Syria and
Iraq is a major helpful goal. The post-ISIS phase is being discussed even before
eliminating the group. This is what Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir
mentioned when he announced his country’s willingness to send troops to Syria to
combat ISIS in cooperation with the US.
In an interview with the German daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Jubeir said: “Saudi
Arabia and other Gulf countries announced they’re willing to participate with
special troops alongside the US. Some countries from the Islamic Alliance to
fight terrorism and extremism are also ready to send troops.” He added: “We will
coordinate with the US to know what the plan is and what is necessary to execute
it.”
ISIS-combat plan
It is worth noting that the US President Donald Trump ordered Mattis to draw up
a plan within 30 days to combat ISIS. Jubeir also told the German daily that he
expects these plans to be proposed soon, indirectly hinting that liberated zones
in Syria may be handed over to the opposition.
“The major idea is to liberate areas from ISIS and to also guarantee that these
areas do not fall in the hands of Hezbollah, Iran or the (Syrian) regime,”
Jubeir added. On January 4, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said that
the Syrian regime must go back to the table of negotiations to hold direct
negotiations with the opposition in order to achieve peaceful political
transition in Syria. “We must send a strong message in which we demand that all
foreign militias exit Syrian territories immediately,” he said. Turkish FM
emphasized the importance of the withdrawal of all militias from Syria in the
end of 2016 after what was known as the Russian-Iranian-Turkish document was
announced. This document led to calling for the Astana conference in Kazakhstan.
Therefore, Russia does not at all oppose Iran’s exit from Syria and Iraq as on
the contrary this serves its interest if we take into consideration that Iran’s
presence will keep the Syrian front ablaze even if the resistance is forced to
give up its weapons.
The post-ISIS phase
Meanwhile in Iraq, talking about the post-ISIS phase has in fact begun. They
also began to particularly address the Iranian situation, like the case is in
Syria. This is why former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki rushed to visit
Iran in the beginning of January as he felt the circumstances are accumulating
against Iran. He rushed to meet with Ali Akbar Velayati, Khamenei’s
international affairs advisor, to be reassured over his future. On January 4,
Al-Arabiya.net reported that according to the Mehr news agency, Maliki said he
went to Iran to meet with Khamenei to discuss what he called “possible threats
post-ISIS.”
Al-Arabiya’s report added: “This is a new political term in international and
regional politics especially that the war against ISIS has not ended yet in Iraq
and Syria. The point of Maliki’s statements that he went to Iran to discuss
possible threats post-ISIS with Iranian officials are unclear as the extremist
organization is not present among the Iranians and ISIS does not have any
announced military activity in Iran.”
**This article is also available in Arabic.
Concessions did not save Geneva
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 28/17
The American government has tried to solve Syria’s crisis by proposing
negotiations in Geneva on three occasions. The negotiations were based on a
balanced political proposal. But the Damascus regime-Iran-Russia axis ruined all
three conferences. And now the Russians along with their allies have come up
with two conferences, one in Astana and the other, which is currently being held
in Geneva. The beginnings simply confirm how the conferences will end: repeated
failure. Although almost everyone - including Turkey, Gulf countries and Donald
Trump’s new administration - cooperated with the Russian project, this was not
enough. In order to satisfy the Russians, and in cooperation with the UN,
providing arms to the opposition was suspended. Moderate opposition factions
were pressured to accept solutions that were less than their expectations and
some of them were prevented from participating in the talks. Washington
supported that and UN mediator Steffan De Mistura became a lawyer for the
Russian stance. The Geneva 4 conference hasn’t ended yet but so far, it seems
the final result will be failure. This situation first shows there’s no victor
or one powerful party to impose on everyone through international support. Iran
and Russia had tried to impose the crumbling Syrian regime before. Second of
all, it exposes failure because the proposed solution does not meet the minimum
expectations of millions of displaced and fearful Syrians. The project’s pillar
is to keep the regime in governance. This means imposing the regime’s policies,
which range from displacement to cancelling the remaining majority of residents
in Syria.
The practical solution
The idea itself cannot stand even if all factions agree to it. It’s a formula
that enables the regime to govern most of Syria by force, like how the West Bank
is under Israeli occupation except that Israel has a massive power and system
that enabled it from maintaining this anomalous situation. Although the Russians
tried to convince a number of opposition factions to join the regime and be
rewarded with seats in the government in exchange, the entire situation, to them
and to everyone else, seems like legislating rape. No one of any value will
accept the solution. Although the Russians tried to convince a number of
opposition factions to join the regime and be rewarded with seats in the
government in exchange, the entire situation, to them and to everyone else,
seems like legislating rape. No one of any value will accept the solution. The
political solution which was previously proposed and rejected by both, the
Syrian regime and the opposition, is still the practical solution and the
reasonable alternative. The solution stipulates a joint regime and not
dependence on it. It can now be developed by keeping the president but giving
the security and finance authorities to the opposition or by having the
president depart and keeping sovereign posts in the regime’s hands but within a
framework of cooperation that’s protected by regional and international powers.
Sharing can be based on a reasonable balance formula that both parties have an
interest in maintaining: either the presidency or the presidency’s jurisdictions
but not both. We have a standing model which is the Taif Agreement which ended
the Lebanese dispute and which is more complicated than the Syrian solution.
It’s based on creating a solution in which all parties made concessions. There
were calls to cancel the Christians’ right to presidency and the presidency’s
jurisdictions and demands to equally distribute them. They ended redistributing
jurisdictions, and the president thus stayed and a part of his jurisdictions
went to other parties. Without the Taif Agreement, the war may have resumed and
the Christians would have lost their shares. If the Sunnis and Shiites had
refused to make concessions, the war would have resulted in more foreign
interventions that would prolong the war as the Lebanese arena had begun to
witness more divisions within sects.
The Lebanese approach
The current political situation in Lebanon is not perfect or complete, but at
least the country is stable. Syria’s dispute is more complicated, the civil
opposition accepts to share power and accepts a constitution that protects all
minorities. Its system includes a good experience as it allowed the
participation of Syrians regardless of their religious and ethnic differences.
But there is one exception - most of the armed Islamic opposition is rejected by
everyone because it has a religious and internationalist project that is not
relevant to the core of the Syrian people’s demands. The failure of the Astana
and Geneva conferences will result in fighting again, even though the moderate
opposition has been deprived of weapons. Some of the opposition groups had to
ally with some terrorist groups to protect themselves after they ran out of
ammunition. The repeated failure may lead intransigent parties to reasonably and
rationally think. Iran must realize that it will not be allowed to take over
Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. Iran achieved its incursion by benefiting from the
weakness of the former American administration. Its dominance over this major
crescent threatens the rest of the region’s countries and the world, either
because it uses its agents as a weapon against its rivals, including the
Americans and Europeans, everywhere or because unrest will continue and attract
extremists thus threatening everyone.
**This article was first published in Asharq Al-Awsat on February 28 2017.
Saudi Arabia and Iraq, the spheres of Arabism
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/February 28/17
In the western side of Mosul where battles have intensified and war raged,
Kurdish journalist Shifa Gardi and her colleague Younes Mustafa, a photographer,
travelled to cover the news. She went to western Mosul, her face expressing
grief and her passion prompting to be in the field. Gardi responded to the call
of duty. During the process of observing the battlefiel and documenting
information and significant developments, she stepped on a landmine, which ISIS
had planted. She lost her life and her spirit ascended into heaven. The scene
makes it easier to comprehend the international desire to uproot terrorism.
Saudi Arabia could not leave Iraq go through this unrest. On the day Gardi was
killed – Saturday – Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir made a surprise visit
to Baghdad. This was the first visit of its kind since 1990. The goal is clear
and direct. There is a desire to bring Iraq to the Arab fold and to discuss
coordination with the country to curb terrorism, especially considering the fact
that the menace is expanding over vast areas of Iraq and Syria.
Policies devoid of wisdom
Iraq has suffered as a result of policies that lack wisdom. In September 1980,
the then-President Saddam Hussein frankly told King Fahad that he intends to
launch a war against Iran. When the king asked why launch the war and start it,
Saddam said Iranian provocations were increasing. The king thus advised him not
to start the war without a real justification. “I will invade Iran, drag
Khomeini from his beard and get him out of Iran,” Saddam thus responded. The
king then told Saddam: “You should not drag him from his beard and he should
drag you from your tie! Act upon reason and logic.” Saddam did not listen to the
king’s advice and launched a war that exhausted Iraq and other Gulf countries.
The major challenge is Shiite radicalism, which is adopted in some policies and
decision-making processes, particularly by those affiliated to the Ad-Dawa Party
and those who genuinely support Iran and open their doors and borders for it. In
2003, there was Sheikh Zayed’s initiative, which Saddam refused. America beat
the drums of war against Iraq. Saudi Arabia was one of the countries opposing
the war the most because the latter meant handing Iraq completely to Iran. Iraq
went through what Iraqi journalist and politician Hassan al-Alawi called Iraq’s
three phases: the Baathist, the American and the Iranian era, which it is
currently living through. This is why Jubeir’s visit is significant as it draws
a map that makes it possible for Iraq to return to its Arab axis. This is of
course not easy. The major challenge is in Shiite radicalism, which is adopted
in some policies and decision-making processes, particularly by those affiliated
to the Ad-Dawa Party and those who genuinely support Iran and open their doors
and borders for it.Iran’s influence in Iraq. It is no secret that Nouri al-Maliki
represents the pillar of Iran’s presence in Iraq, and he does not hide that. He
once said that “the weapons which the Iraqis are fighting with are Iranian,” and
he criticized America’s lack of support to him.
This reminds us of an important criticism made by “Nouri al-Maliki’s maker”,
veteran journalist and politician Fouad Ajami who expressed his regret for
recommending Maliki and believed he was a soldier of fortune who is destroying
Iraq’s unity and committing pure sectarian acts without taking Iraq’s historic
religious, ethnic and racial diversity into consideration. Saudi Arabia
congratulated Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi for the success of security
forces in their confrontation against armed groups. It decided to name a Saudi
ambassador in Baghdad and it wants to employ its military and security
wherewithal to serve Iraq’s stability and unity. Then there’s the important
confirmation that Saudi Arabia stands at an equal distance from everyone. This
is not fiction. If Saudi Arabia only wanted to support the Sunnis, it would have
done so since 2003 when the arena was empty and before Iran and its wings
infiltrated the scene.
However, Saudi Arabia has since day one decided to support Iraqi unity and
powers of political moderation and carry out humanitarian work such as Saudi
King Salman’s sponsorship of 1,000 Iraqi children who were displaced by the
terrorist ISIS.
Iraq will remain Arab and one day it will return to its natural space, the
reservoir of Arab and Islamic civilization.
*The article was first published in Al Sharq al-Awsat on February 28, 2016.
Punish those who falsely accuse others
Khaled Almaeena/Al Arabiya/February 28/17
A report in a local paper focused on the damages inflicted on people by false
accusations made to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (Nazaha). Nazaha
Chairman Khalid Al-Muhaisen highlighted some of the points and said that care
will be taken to protect those against whom allegations have been made.
Personally, I am somewhat suspicious of people who in the “public interest” send
letters, whether anonymous or signed, accusing others of wrongdoing. Before
Nazaha was created, it was usual to have those who were accused locked up while
investigations were being made. This method itself is very cruel. It’s
unfortunate that in our society we have more than our fair share of evil people
who thrive on the misery of others. However, my advice to the authorities is not
to jump to conclusions. Every person is innocent until proven guilty. And this
message is relevant to all levels of society because it will help safeguard the
rights of innocent people.It is necessary to have a well-trained, professional,
enlightened and modern judiciary that will be part of Saudi Vision 2030
No ‘wasta’
And it is not only Nazaha that these miscreants approach with their false
claims. There are those who use their friendship or position to cause harm to
others based on their personal interests, likes or dislikes. And if the victim
has no “wasta” (loosely translated as “connections” or “influence”), it is a
nightmare.
I know of two such cases that are truly heartbreaking and many more may exist.
While we all agree that wrongdoers and those who pose a threat to our security
should be dealt with, we cannot condone “collateral damage” in terms of
reputation, hardship, jail or fines.It is, therefore, necessary to have a
well-trained, professional, enlightened and modern judiciary that will be part
of Saudi Vision 2030. We should not create a society of whistleblowers or
minders who observe others and spy on them and try to damage them. The
government must ensure that those who falsely accuse others for their own
interests or revenge are duly punished. This will ensure justice for all.
**This article was first published in the Saudi Gazette on February 26, 2016.