LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
August 24/17
Compiled &
Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias/english.august24.17.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since
2016
Bible Quotations For
Today
You hypocrites! Does
not each of you on the sabbath untie his ox or his donkey from the manger, and
lead it away to give it water?
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 13/10-17/:"Jesus was
teaching in one of the synagogues on the sabbath. And just then there appeared a
woman with a spirit that had crippled her for eighteen years. She was bent over
and was quite unable to stand up straight. When Jesus saw her, he called her
over and said, ‘Woman, you are set free from your ailment.’ When he laid his
hands on her, immediately she stood up straight and began praising God. But the
leader of the synagogue, indignant because Jesus had cured on the sabbath, kept
saying to the crowd, ‘There are six days on which work ought to be done; come on
those days and be cured, and not on the sabbath day.’ But the Lord answered him
and said, ‘You hypocrites! Does not each of you on the sabbath untie his ox or
his donkey from the manger, and lead it away to give it water? And ought not
this woman, a daughter of Abraham whom Satan bound for eighteen long years, be
set free from this bondage on the sabbath day?’ When he said this, all his
opponents were put to shame; and the entire crowd was rejoicing at all the
wonderful things that he was doing."
The believers from there,
when they heard of us, came as far as the Forum of Appius and Three Taverns to
meet us. On seeing them, Paul thanked God and took courage
Acts of the Apostles 28/11-15/:"Three months later we set sail on a ship that
had wintered at the island, an Alexandrian ship with the Twin Brothers as its
figurehead. We put in at Syracuse and stayed there for three days; then we
weighed anchor and came to Rhegium. After one day there a south wind sprang up,
and on the second day we came to Puteoli. There we found believers and were
invited to stay with them for seven days. And so we came to Rome. The believers
from there, when they heard of us, came as far as the Forum of Appius and Three
Taverns to meet us. On seeing them, Paul thanked God and took courage."
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources
published on August 23-24/17
Bashir Gemayel is A Dream That Will Never Die/Elias
Bejjani/August 23/17
The new Iranian threat 'exposes the weakness of the nuclear agreement'/Alexandra
Lukash and Nir Cohen/Ynetnews/August 23/17
Can Greenblatt succeed where his predecessors failed/Noam Tibon/Ynetnews/August
23/17
Netanyahu meets with Putin, expresses concern over Iran's role in Syria/Herb
Keinon/Jerusalem Post/August 23, 2017
Two New Totalitarian Movements: Radical Islam and Political Correctness/A. Z.
Mohamed/Gatestone Institute/August 23/17
Iran vs. Turkey, the MidEast’s Perpetual Rivalry/Daniel Pipes Washington Times
August 23, 2017
Palestinians: Taking Journalists Hostage/Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone
Institute/August 23/17
The President Has a Special Obligation to Condemn Nazis and KKK/Alan M.
Dershowitz/Gatestone Institute/August 23/17
Pyongyang cheers on Bashar al-Assad/Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/August 23/17
Vehicle terrorism, the up and running modern militant tool/Dr. Halla Diyab/Al
Arabiya/August 23/17
Trump, the media and the right wing/Ahmad al-Farraj/Al Arabiya/August 23/17
President Trump and the Palestinian issue/Dr. Ali Al-Ghamdi/Al Arabiya/August
23/17
Titles For Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on August 23-24/17
Bashir Gemayel is A Dream That Will Never Die
Lebanese Army Prepares for Assault's 4th Stage, Deploys in Areas Liberated from
IS
Saudi Minister in Beirut for Talks with Top Officials
Aoun Pledges $30M for Developing Areas Liberated from IS
Paris Sees No Need to Revise UNIFIL Mandate as U.N. Reportedly Snubs U.S.
Request
Hariri from Arsal: State is Your Sanctuary, Services to Reach Town
LF and Marada Seek to Normalize Ties in Mutual Visits
Hariri from Ras Baalbek: We Want the Army to Get Stronger
New Truce Reached in Ain el-Hilweh after Mawlawi Threatens to 'Bomb Sidon'
Hariri receives Jumblatt at Center House
Nasrallah to deliver speech Thursday on latest developments
Saudi Arabia promotes Waleed Bukhari to Minister Plenipotentiary
Sabhan arrives in Beirut for talks with Lebanese officials on latest
developments
Lebanon's Army Commander meets with outgoing German Military Attaché
Lebanon's beauty queen loses title for visiting Israel
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
August 23-24/17
Chad Shuts Qatari Embassy, Tells Staff to Leave
11 Beheaded in Attack on Haftar Forces in Libya
Egypt Criticizes U.S. Decision to Cut Aid
Iraqi Forces Advance towards Heart of IS-Held Bastion
Zarif: Iran, Saudi delegations to visit their embassies in Riyadh and Tehran
Bahrain to file complaints in UN security council and ICC against Qatar
Qatar to return its ambassador to Iran: Foreign ministry
U.S. Defense Chief in Turkey for Talks on Syria, Kurds
N. Korea's Kim 'Starting to Respect U.S.', Says Trump
Yemen Rebels Warn Ally Saleh Will Pay in War of Words
Latest Lebanese Related News
published on
August 23-24/17
Bashir Gemayel is A Dream That Will Never Die
Elias Bejjani/August 23/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=58062
It is a historical fact that patriotic, national, religious causes cannot be
killed by assassinating their founders or those who lobby for them. In fact, the
contrary usually happens.
History shows that major worldwide religions spread after the departure of their
founding leaders. Christianity, for example, spread all over the world after the
crucifixion of Jesus Christ. The Pharisees crucified Jesus, believing his death
would put an end to his new religion. They were disappointed, and Christianity
became the number one religion in the whole world. Luke 12:4 in the Holy Bible
reads, “Don’t be afraid of those who kill the body and can do nothing more.”
On August 23/1982, following in the steps of the Pharisees, Lebanon’s
collaborators joined by some regional tyrants deluded themselves into believing
that assassinating President-elect Sheik Bashir Gemayel, would also kill the
Lebanese cause. They thought killing Bashir would destroy Lebanon’s history and
identity, and sever the Lebanese from their roots.
What happened 2000 years ago, happened again in a way. History repeated itself
and the contemporary Pharisees were no more lucky than the Pharisees of the
Christ era.
Today the Lebanese cause is known worldwide and every day more Lebanese
everywhere are committing themselves to it in spite of the hardships and
difficulties.
On the annual anniversary of Bachir’s election as Lebanon’s president on August
23/1982, we renew our vows and declare again our commitment to Bashir’s cause
and dream, to our national Lebanese identity, to liberation, to basic dignity
and to holy resistance against the occupation.
Bashir’s cause is not dead. It cannot die, will never die as long as one
Lebanese remains committed to Bashir’s patriotic beliefs and loyalty to Lebanon,
to 7000 years of history and civilization … Lebanon the 10452 km2.
Bashir’s national dream for Lebanon is not dead, for no criminal can kill dreams
about freedom. Dreams are acts of intellectual imaging and portrayal of
aspirations, objectives and hopes that people endeavour to fulfill in reality.
Bashir’s dream is alive in the hearts and spirits of every patriotic Lebanese
all over the world.
Our deep-rooted Lebanese identity is unique.
It was carved by our faithful ancestors in Lebanon’s mighty mountains and
planted with sweat and blood in its holy soil throughout six thousand years of
heroism and sacrifices. Generation after generation, Lebanese have built Lebanon
and made it into a fort and oasis for freedom, and an asylum for the
persecuted…. Lebanon may not be a big country, but it is big in deeds.
For 7000 years Lebanon was successful in surviving with dignity, through
hundreds of invaders, tyrants and conquerors…all were forced to depart defamed
and in humiliation, defamed.
Bashir gave our identity worldwide dimension and made it a cause and purpose for
each and every Lebanese.
Lebanon’s liberation is the aim of every patriotic Lebanese.
Virtues of dignity and resistance are known characteristics for Lebanon and its
people.
They are deeply rooted in Lebanon’s holy soil and in the Lebanese minds, spirits
and conscience, as well as in their noble conduct and faith.
Bashir portrayed and personified wisdom, patriotic conduct, courage, national
devotion and leadership traits, all the distinctive Lebanese virtues.
He carried the liberation torch, and never abandoned the Lebanese cause, and
became its martyr.
Bashir Gemayel scared those who feared truth, justice and sainthood.
He frightened collaborators, traitors and those who never believed in Lebanon’s
history and identity.
Bashir was a nightmare for all Lebanon’s enemies when he was alive, and still is
years after his assassination.
Sheik Bashir, Sheik Bashir, 35 years after your departure, you are still in our
conscience and hearts.
Your dream is still our dream, and we are still fighting for the same cause.
Lebanon is still occupied and the 10452 km2 are not yet liberated. But in spite
of all hardships and difficulties, the torch that you carried is still held
high, and the battle rages.
By God’s will, the fight will not cease before the complete liberation of our
Lebanon, the Lebanon that you loved, cherished and worshipped.
Bashir, Bashir, you are alive. When the Pharisee’s murdered you, only your flesh
passed away. And in that moment your sanctified image was burned forever into
the hearts of your people.
Your heroism was sealed.
Bashir, you speak to the conscience of every Lebanese who believes in Lebanon
and its people. You live on in us, and in our blessed heritage.
Long Live Free Lebanon.
*This article was first published in year 2000. This above copy is slightly
modified
Lebanese Army Prepares for Assault's 4th Stage, Deploys in
Areas Liberated from IS
Naharnet/August 23/17/The Lebanese army began Wednesday morning a deployment
operation in eastern border areas liberated from the terrorist Islamic State
group, as it started preparations to launch the fourth stage of Operation Dawn
of the Outskirts, an army statement said. Engineering units were excavating new
routes and searching for landmines and explosives, the statement added. The Army
Command stressed that “there will be no ceasefire with the terrorist groups
until they are completely routed.”Separately, the army announced the death of
31-year-old First Sergeant Walid Mahmoud Freij after he succumbed at dawn
Wednesday to wounds sustained in an August 19 landmine explosion in Ras
Baalbek's outskirts. The army had announced Tuesday that it became in control of
100 out of 120 square kilometers of territory previously held by IS after
capturing several strategic hills and areas throughout the day.
Saudi Minister in Beirut for Talks with Top Officials
Naharnet/August 23/17/Saudi State Minister for Gulf Affairs Thamer al-Sabhan
arrived Wednesday evening Beirut for talks with top Lebanese officials, the
National News Agency said. Sabhan's several-day visit will address the bilateral
ties between the two countries and the latest local and regional developments,
NNA added. He was welcomed at the airport by Telecom Minister Jamal al-Jarrah,
representing Prime Minister Saad Hariri, and Saudi charge d'affaires in Lebanon
Walid al-Bukhari.
Aoun Pledges $30M for Developing Areas Liberated from IS
Naharnet/August 23/17/President Michel Aoun on Wednesday vowed that the state
will implement developmental projects in eastern border areas liberated by the
army from the hands of the Islamic State group. “The post-liberation phase will
be for developing these areas and for eliminating the remnants of the abnormal
situations that prevailed over the past years,” Aoun told his visitors. He
revealed that “funds worth $30 million have been earmarked to execute a number
of urgent projects,” hailing “the sons of these regions” for clinging to “their
land and properties.”The army began Wednesday morning a deployment operation in
eastern border areas liberated from IS militants, as it started preparations to
launch the fourth stage of Operation Dawn of the Outskirts, an army statement
said. The army had announced Tuesday that it became in control of 100 out of 120
square kilometers of territory previously held by IS after capturing several
strategic hills and areas throughout the day.
Paris Sees No Need to Revise UNIFIL Mandate as U.N.
Reportedly Snubs U.S. Request
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 23/17/France said Wednesday it wants the
U.N. peacekeeping mission in Lebanon to stick to its current mandate, opposing
U.S. calls to strengthen the force's authority to deal with arms movements by
Hizbullah. Turkey's official news agency meanwhile reported that the U.N.
Security Council “rejected a U.S. request to revise the mandate of the United
Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).”Anne Gueguen, France's deputy
permanent representative to the United Nations, told reporters her government
saw no need to change the 2006 Security Council resolution that sets the
mission's current mandate, which expires at the end of August. "We want to keep
the mandate as such," she said, adding that "does mean there won't be any change
in the resolution."The 10,500-strong United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon has
been in southern Lebanon since 1978, when it was charged with confirming the
withdrawal of Israeli forces from a demilitarized zone between the two
countries. After a 2006 war between Israel and Hizbullah in southern Lebanon,
the U.N. force's mandate was expanded to include keeping the peace and helping
the Lebanese army reassert its authority in the aftermath of the conflict. "We
are for a reaffirmation of its mandate and the optimal effectiveness of its
mission," the French diplomat said, speaking before closed door Security Council
consultations on renewing UNIFIL's mandate. On August 7, U.S. ambassador to the
United Nations, Nikki Haley, said UNIFIL's mandate should be enhanced to prevent
the spread of illegal weapons in southern Lebanon, which she blamed on Hizbullah
and said threatened the region's stability. "UNIFIL must increase its capacity
and commitment to investigating and reporting these violations," she said.
France, which contributes 800 troops to UNIFIL, plans to submit a resolution
extending the force's mandate for another year, Gueguen said. "UNIFIL plays a
decisive role to stabilize the south of Lebanon in a very difficult original
context and it has demonstrated a stabilizing effect in the volatile, complex
and troubled environment," she said. In a letter to the Security Council on
August 4, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he wanted to look at ways
to improve UNIFIL's efforts "regarding the illegal presence of armed personnel,
weapons or infrastructure inside its area of operations."A Security Council vote
on renewing UNIFIL's mandate is expected on August 30.
Hariri from Arsal: State is Your Sanctuary, Services to
Reach Town
Naharnet/August 23/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri on Wednesday paid a surprise
visit to the northeastern border town of Arsal where he received a popular
welcome, shortly after he inspected army units in the nearby border town of Ras
Baalbek. “My visit to Arsal is a duty owed to this town, which paid a hefty
price as a result of all the circumstances that prevailed in the past,” Hariri
said at the headquarters of Arsal Municipality. “Arsal's residents opened their
houses and welcomed the refugees without any hesitation or conditions,” Hariri
added. “It is our duty as government to stand by Arsal's residents,” he
stressed. And noting that “all Arsal residents should return to their homes,”
Hariri promised that “the government will execute several projects to the
benefit of the town's residents.”“Arsal is not an isolated island and services
will reach it. There will be a secondary school and a government hospital,”
Hariri added. Addressing Arsal's residents, he went on to say: “You have
sacrificed a lot like no other region has done. The state and the army are your
sanctuary.” “The army will deploy in all the outskirts (of the eastern border
towns) and it is the sole defender of Lebanese land. Our duty is to provide the
army with all the capabilities needed to preserve our land,” Hariri added.
Hariri's visit to the eastern border towns comes a day after the army announced
that it had managed to liberate 100 out of 120 square kilometers of territory
from IS' hands after four days of battles. On Wednesday, the army began a
deployment operation in border areas liberated from IS militants, as it started
preparations to launch the fourth stage of Operation Dawn of the Outskirts, an
army statement said. Around 20 days ago, jihadists from al-Nusra Front group and
scores of Syrian refugees were evacuated from Arsal's outskirts followed a
six-day Hizbullah offensive in the border region. The army did not take part in
that battle but it shelled militants seeking to advance towards the town of
Arsal and the nearby refugee encampments. Militants from both IS and al-Nusra
had invaded Arsal in 2014 before being ousted by the army after days of deadly
battles. The jihadists of both groups remained entrenched in the outskirts of
several border towns until this summer.
LF and Marada Seek to Normalize Ties in Mutual Visits
Naharnet/August 23/17/Marada Movement official and ex-minister Youssef Saade has
visited Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea in Maarab and talks between the two
men tackled the course of the relation between Marada and the LF in addition to
important political issues, media reports said. Saade's visit to Maarab “is part
of the mutual coordination between the LF and Marada, amid a common desire to
turn the page on the disputes of the past and establish a relation in which the
controversial issues would be put aside, despite disagreement on major topics
such as the Syrian crisis and the relation with Hizbullah,” LF sources told al-Joumhouria
newspaper in remarks published Wednesday. “What has been achieved so far between
the two parties is very important in terms of reducing the areas of dispute and
tension,” the sources added, noting that a thorny issue such as normalizing the
Lebanese government's ties with Damascus “has not affected communication”
between the two parties despite their conflicting viewpoints on the issue.
Saade's Maarab meeting had been preceded by a visit by LF ministers Ghassan
Hasbani and Melhem Riachi to Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh. “The
LF's Zgharta department also organized its annual ceremony in Ehden, in an
unprecedented step that witnessed the participation of a huge LF crowd, a sign
that the relation has been normalized within the framework of accepting the
other and political pluralism,” the LF sources added. The sources however noted
that “the joint will for openness, cooperation and coordination will not
necessarily lead to an electoral alliance, but rather to putting all options on
the table.”Marada and the LF have been historically at odds in connection with a
1978 civil war massacre. Marada accuses the Lebanese Forces of carrying out the
carnage, in which Suleiman Franjieh's father, mother, infant sister and around
30 Marada supporters were killed.
Hariri from Ras Baalbek: We Want the Army to Get Stronger
Naharnet/August 23/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri on Wednesday inspected military
units deployed in the eastern border town of Ras Baalbek, where he stressed the
need to boost the army's capabilities so that it becomes the sole defender of
Lebanon. “This is a highly patriotic battle and we have martyrs who have fallen
to protect the country and provide security and stability for the Lebanese
citizens,” said Hariri in Ras Baalbek, referring to a major army offensive
against Islamic State militants on the eastern border. “We want this army to get
stronger because we want the state alone to perform the security missions,” the
premier added, in the presence of Army Commander General Joseph Aoun. Hariri
also stressed that the army is not coordinating militarily with any party in its
operation, in reference to Hizbullah and the Syrian army. “The army did not lack
the ability to liberate Arsal's outskirts, but we had political calculations in
this regard,” Hariri added, in response to a reporter's question. Hariri's visit
comes a day after the army announced that it was now in control of 100 out of
120 square kilometers of territory previously held by IS.
New Truce Reached in Ain el-Hilweh after Mawlawi Threatens
to 'Bomb Sidon'
Naharnet/August 23/17/Cautious calm was engulfing the Palestinian refugee camp
of Ain el-Hilweh on Wednesday afternoon after a ceasefire was reached between
the rival parties. The calm follows around seven days of fighting in the camp
that pitted two small extremist groups led by Islamist militants Bilal Badr and
Bilal al-Orqoub against the secular Fatah Movement and the Joint Palestinian
Security Force. According to the National News Agency, the joint force started
deploying in the camp's al-Tiri neighborhood at 4:30 pm. The neighborhood was
the main frontier in the fighting and is the bastion of the Islamist groups.
Armed clashes had intensified in the morning after the sounds of grenade and
rocket explosions and machinegun and sniper fire echoed across the camp
throughout the night, NNA said. Gunshots and shells reached areas outside the
clashes zone in the camp, such as the al-Zeeb, Taytaba and al-Sifsaf
neighborhoods, as stray bullets reached the Sidon serail outside the camp and
reportedly wounded two Lebanese security personnel. Al-Akhbar newspaper reported
Wednesday that after the noose was tightened on Islamists in al-Tiri
neighborhood, Badr and fugitive Lebanese militant Shadi al-Mawlawi had
threatened to “bomb Sidon and the army's posts with shells and rockets to press
Fatah to accept a halt to the fighting.”
Hariri receives Jumblatt at Center House
Wed 23 Aug 2017/NNA - Prime Minister Saad Hariri received on Wednesday evening
at the center house "Democratic Gathering" head, MP Walid Jumblatt, accompanied
by his son, Teymour, and MP Wael Abu Faour, in the presence of Minister Ghattas
Khoury.
Nasrallah to deliver speech Thursday on latest developments
Wed 23 Aug 2017/NNA - Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah will
deliver a televised speech Thursday at 8.30 pm, where he will address the recent
local political developments.
Saudi Arabia promotes Waleed Bukhari to Minister
Plenipotentiary
Wed 23 Aug 2017/NNA - Saudi Cabinet announced the promotion of Saudi Charge
d'affaires in Lebanon, Advisor Waleed Abdullah Bukhari, to the post of Minister
Plenipotentiary at the Foreign Ministry. The announcement came on Tuesday in the
wake of Saudi Cabinet's session held under the chairmanship of Crown Prince,
Mohammed bin Salman, at Al-Salam Palace in Jeddah.
Sabhan arrives in Beirut for talks with Lebanese officials
on latest developments
Wed 23 Aug 2017/NNA - Minister of State for Arab Gulf Affairs at the Saudi
Foreign Ministry, Thamer bin Ali Al-Sabhan, arrived on Wednesday evening at the
Beirut Rafic Hariri International Airport, on a few-day official visit to
Lebanon. Minister Al-Sabhan will hold talks with senior Lebanese officials on
the bilateral ties between the two countries, and the latest developments on the
local and regional arena. Greeting him at the Airport had been Telecommunication
Minister, Jamal Al-Jarrah, representing Prime Minister, Saad Hariri, Saudi
Charge d'affaires in Lebanon, Advisor Waleed Al-Bukhari, and senior Embassy
staff.
Lebanon's Army Commander meets with outgoing German
Military Attaché
Wed 23 Aug 2017/NNA - Army Commander, General Joseph Aoun, on Wednesday received
at his Yarze office German Military Attaché, Lt. Col. Dietrich Jensch, who came
on a farewell visit at the end of his term of mission in Lebanon.
Lt. Col. Jensch introduced his successor Lt. Col. Richard Von Stetten.
Lebanon's beauty queen loses title for visiting Israel
Roi Kais/Ynetnews/August 23/17/After it was reported that Amanda Hanna, the
winner of the 2017 Miss Lebanon Emigrant Beauty Pageant—visited Israel in 2016,
Lebanon's Minister of Tourism decides to strip her of her title over her
violation of Lebanon's boycott of Israel.
Amanda Hanna, who won the 2017 Miss Lebanon Emigrant Beauty Pageant, has been
stripped of her title over her 2016 visit to Israel.
Hanna, who is Swedish-Lebanese, visited Israel as part of an academic tour,
using her Swedish passport to enter the state. She lost her title just a week
after winning it. "After communicating our decision with Lebanon's Minister of
Tourism, he decided that Hanna should be stripped of her title because her visit
to Israel violates our country's laws," a statement from the pageant's
organizing committee said.
According to the Independent, the organizers have not yet announced whether the
second-place winner will claim Hanna's spot.
On August 14, after winning the pageant, Hanna published a post on Facebook in
which she thanked her supporters.
“At first I was skeptical about it, but it turned out that I was wrong," Hanna
wrote. "It has been one of the best weeks of my life, where I have, among other
things, had to go around in Lebanon & visit wonderful places. I've gotten to
know people who have come to stand close to me & I have developed in particular
as a person. It has been a wonderful trip & I am incredibly happy that I
participated."
Lebanon has a cultural ban on Israel, which it considers an enemy state, and
prohibits its citizens from traveling there and from Israeli citizens from
entering the state.
Lebanon has even banned the movie Wonder Woman over its lead actor being an
Israeli citizen and a former IDF soldier. Furthermore, this is not the first
Israel-Lebanon incident that takes place against the backdrop of beauty
contests.
During the Miss Universe contest in 2015, Miss Lebanon almost lost her title
after social networks called for her to be punished following a selfie in which
Miss Israel, Doron Matalon, was also present.
At the time. Miss Lebanon, Saly Greige, claimed Matalon had harassed her with
selfie requests during the competition.
"Since the first day of my arrival to participate to Miss Universe, I was very
cautious to avoid being in any photo or communication with Miss Israel, who
tried several times to take a photo with me,” Greige said.
“I was having a photo with Miss Japan and Miss Slovenia, (when) suddenly Miss
Israel jumped in and took a selfie, and uploaded it on her social media.”
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
August 23-24/17
Chad Shuts Qatari Embassy, Tells Staff to Leave
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 23/17/Chad announced Wednesday it was
closing Qatar's embassy in N'Djamena and giving its staff 10 days to leave,
accusing Doha of seeking to destabilize the country via Libya. "Given the
continued involvement of the state of Qatar in the attempts at the
destabilization of Chad from Libya, the government has decided on the closure of
the embassy and the departure of the ambassador and diplomatic personnel from
national territory," the foreign ministry said in a statement. "They have been
given 10 days in this regard," it said.
It added that the decision was driven by the will to "safeguard peace and
stability in the region."Chad, Mauritania and Senegal all recalled their
ambassadors from Qatar in June. They acted after Saudi Arabia, the United Arab
Emirates, Bahrain, Yemen and Egypt broke off diplomatic and trade ties with
Qatar, accusing it of supporting Islamist extremists, a charge the tiny,
gas-rich state denies.
11 Beheaded in Attack on Haftar Forces in Libya
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 23/17/At least 11 people were beheaded
Wednesday in an attack on a checkpoint controlled by Libyan military strongman
Khalifa Haftar south of Tripoli, a spokesman for his forces said."At least nine
soldiers were beheaded... in addition to two civilians killed in the same way"
at the checkpoint about 500 kilometers (300 miles) south of Tripoli, Colonel
Ahmad al-Mesmari said, blaming the Islamic State group for the attack.
Egypt Criticizes U.S. Decision to Cut Aid
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 23/17/Egypt on Wednesday criticized a U.S.
decision to reduce financial aid and withhold some military assistance as a
"misjudgment" of strategic ties between the two allies. The foreign ministry
said it "regrets the decision" to reduce some funds allocated under a U.S.
assistance program and withhold the disbursement of other military aid. It
provided no details of the cuts, but U.S. media reports said Washington on
Tuesday denied Egypt $96 million in aid and delayed $195 million in military
funding because of concerns over its human rights record. "Egypt considers this
step as a misjudgment of the nature of the strategic relations that binds the
two countries over decades," the foreign ministry said in a statement. The move
"reflects the lack of understanding of the importance of supporting the
stability and success of Egypt" and "implies a mixing of cards that may have
negative repercussions," it said. The New York Times quoted the State Department
as saying the move followed a lack progress on human rights and a new law
restricting activities of nongovernmental organizations. U.S. President Donald
Trump's arrival in office earlier this year initially saw an improvement in
relations with Egypt, after his predecessor Barack Obama had given President
Abdel Fattah al-Sisi the cold shoulder over rights issues. Obama temporarily
suspended military aid to Egypt after the July 2013 overthrow of Islamist
president Mohamed Morsi and a bloody crackdown on Morsi's supporters that
followed.
Sisi in May ratified the NGO law, which critics say will severely restrict the
work of civil society, including by banning the carrying out and publishing of
studies without prior permission from the state, with large fines for violating
the law. Trump set aside criticism of Sisi's rights record while pledging to
maintain support for the key U.S. ally, which receives an annual $1.3 billion in
military aid. Egyptian authorities have been fighting an insurgency based in the
north of the Sinai Peninsula, where an Islamic State group affiliate has killed
hundreds of soldiers and policemen. The Pentagon is also concerned with
preventing jihadists from crossing Libya's porous border with Egypt.
Iraqi Forces Advance towards Heart of IS-Held Bastion
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 23/17/Iraqi forces advanced Wednesday
towards central Tal Afar, one of the Islamic State group's last strongholds in
the country, as aid workers braced for an exodus of civilians fleeing the
fighting. Armored personnel carriers full of soldiers and fighters of the Hashed
al-Shaabi paramilitary coalition moved into al-Nour district early in the
morning as warplanes flew overhead, said an AFP photographer on the ground. They
encountered trucks parked across roads with earthen embankments aimed at
stopping them, as well as sniper fire and mortar shelling. Six weeks after
routing the jihadists from Iraq's second city Mosul, the Iraqi forces launched
an assault Sunday on Tal Afar, where an estimated 1,000 jihadists are holed up.
They retook three first districts of the city on Tuesday, but as with the
grueling nine-month campaign to recapture Mosul, their convoys face an onslaught
of suicide and car bomb attacks. On Wednesday they "entered the neighborhood of
Al-Kifah North... and headed towards the center of the city," said Ahmed al-Assadi,
spokesman for the Hashed al-Shaabi paramilitary coalition fighting IS alongside
the army and police. "All the lines of IS defense outside the city have been
broken and the troops are advancing from all directions towards the inner
quarters of the city," he added. As they advanced, troops said they discovered a
network of underground tunnels used by the jihadists to launch attacks behind
lines of already conquered territory, or to escape.
Leaflet drop
In a bid to counter these surprise attacks, the Iraqis dropped leaflets
overnight calling on civilians to help by marking houses where the jihadists are
located. The International Organization for Migration said "thousands of
civilians" had fled Tal Afar since the offensive began. But around 30,000
civilians are trapped in the fighting, according to the United Nations. Caught
between the two sides, those still inside the city have been pounded by Iraqi
and U.S.-led coalition aircraft for weeks, as well as intense artillery fire
since Sunday. The U.N. refugee agency (UNHCR) fears they could be "used as human
shields" and that "attempts to flee could result in executions and shootings,"
said the spokesman for U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres. The United
Nations and aid agencies are working to establish shelters for the displaced.
Those who flee through desert areas face temperatures of up to 43 degrees
Celsius (109 Fahrenheit), sometimes for periods of more than 10 hours, putting
them at risk of dehydration, said Viren Falcao of the Danish Refugee Council.
Tal Afar was once a key supply hub for IS between Mosul -- which lies around 70
kilometers (45 miles) to the east -- and the Syrian border. The Iraqi forces
massed around Tal Afar on Tuesday before the jihadists responded with artillery
fire. Army, police and of the Hashed al-Shaabi paramilitary coalition later took
"full control" of the al-Kifah, al-Nour and al-Askari districts, the Hashed
said. The Iraqi forces had encircled the city despite what Hashed spokesman
Assadi called "intense" fighting. He said the battle for the city would probably
last weeks, in contrast to the months-long battle for Mosul.
On the run
After meeting Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi in Baghdad on Tuesday, U.S.
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said the jihadists were "on the run.""Cities have
been liberated, people freed from ISIS, from Daesh," Mattis said, using
alternative names for IS. The jihadists had not been able "to stand up to our
team in combat, and they have not retaken one inch of ground that they lost," he
said. Mattis declined to make any predictions about the battle. "ISIS' days are
certainly numbered, but it's not over yet and it's not going to be over anytime
soon," he said. IS jihadists in June 2014 overran Tal Afar, a Shiite enclave in
the predominantly Sunni province of Nineveh. At the time, its population of
around 200,000 was overwhelmingly Turkmen, one of Iraq's largest ethnic
minorities. Tal Afar's Shiites were directly targeted by IS, while some members
of its Sunni minority joined the jihadists and went on to form a contingent with
a particularly brutal reputation.
Zarif: Iran, Saudi delegations to visit their embassies in
Riyadh and Tehran
Staff writer, Al Arabiya EnglishWednesday, 23 August 2017/Iranian Foreign
Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has said visas have been issued for visits by
Iranian and Saudi delegations to inspect the embassies of the two countries in
Riyadh and Tehran after the pilgrimage season.In an interview to ISNA news
agency, Zarif denied Saudi Arabia’s request for Iraqi mediation. He said he had
held talks with Iraqi officials after visits to Saudi Arabia and found the
inaccuracy of these statements. Zarif also said that Tehran is ready for
dialogue with Saudi Arabia and is making all efforts to reach a political
solution to the crisis in the region.
Bahrain to file complaints in UN security council and ICC
against Qatar
Staff Writer, Al Arabiya EnglishWednesday, 23 August 2017/Bahrain will file
official complaints to the United Nations Security Council and the International
Criminal Court against Qatar, according to Bahrain’s first deputy speaker, Ali
al-Aradi. Aradi on Tuesday told Al Arabiya News Channel’s Panorama program that
the kingdom will organize a committee to compile and document Qatar’s violations
against Bahrain. He added that the complaints to the UN and ICC will be based on
the fact that Qatar has violated the UN charter and committed “fourth generation
warfare crimes”.Fourth generation warfare is a concept of warfare that is
decentralized, utilizes terrorism as a tactic and relies on media manipulation.
In his statements to Al Arabiya, al-Aradi said that Doha had interfered in the
affairs of Bahrain and has supported terrorism. He further noted that Qatar has
supported terror groups such as Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood to
destabilize the region as part of its foreign policy agenda. Recently Bahraini
TV broadcast a documentary entitled the “Academy of Destruction” that shed light
on the work of the Academy of Change which Doha backs and aired confessions that
Doha wanted to topple the regime in Bahrain. According to the aired confessions,
figures who were embraced by the academy were sent to Manama to execute the
Qatari goal to spread incitement and chaos to topple the regime in Bahrain. The
Academy of Change is headed by Hisham Morsy, the son-in-law of Yusuf al-Qaradawi
who is on the black list issued by the four countries which boycotted Qatar.
Qatar to return its ambassador to Iran: Foreign ministry
Reuters, DubaiThursday, 24 August 2017/Qatar said on Wednesday its ambassador to
Iran, who was withdrawn in January last year, would return to Iran. “Qatar
announced that its ambassador to Tehran will return to resume his diplomatic
duties,” the Qatari foreign ministry's information office said in a statement on
its website, adding that Doha wanted to strengthen ties with the Islamic
republic.
U.S. Defense Chief in Turkey for Talks on Syria, Kurds
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 23/17/Pentagon chief Jim Mattis arrived in
Ankara on Wednesday for talks with Turkish leaders expected to focus on
Washington's arming of a Syrian Kurdish militia, which Turkey views as a terror
group, in the fight against Islamic State. Mattis flew in for the one-day visit
after stopping in Iraq to review progress in the campaign against IS militants,
where he urged coalition partners to prevent other political issues from
disrupting the growing momentum against the jihadists. In Ankara, he will hold
talks with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Defense Minister Nurettin Canikli.
Turkey, an important NATO ally of the United States and part of the coalition
against IS, is incensed that Washington has been arming the Kurdish Peoples'
Protection Units (YPG) militias in the assault on the jihadists' stronghold Raqa,
in northern Syria. Turkey regards the YPG as the Syrian affiliate of the
outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). In May, the Pentagon said it had begun
transferring small arms and vehicles to the YPG to support their role as part of
the Syrian Democratic Forces, a Kurdish-Syrian Arab alliance fighting IS. The
weapons include AK-47s and small-caliber machine guns. The SDF is currently
leading the assault on Raqa, with artillery and air support from U.S.-led
coalition forces.
Kurdish referendum concerns
U.S. officials on Tuesday said the grinding fight was the "priority" in the
counter-IS campaign since the fall of Mosul last month, the jihadists' Iraqi
hub. The Kurdish regional government in northern Iraq -- which is also playing a
key role in the fight against IS -- is planning its own independence referendum
in September. Mattis met Tuesday with Iraqi Kurdish leader Massud Barzani in
Erbil to express U.S. opposition to the referendum. On the same day, Erdogan
vowed Turkey would thwart any attempt by the YPG and its political wing the
Democratic Union Party (PYD) to carve out a Kurdish state in northern Syria. "We
do not and will never allow a so-called state to be established by the PYD, YPG
in northern Syria," Erdogan said. The U.S. is also concerned about warming ties
between Iran and Turkey. Iranian armed forces chief General Mohammad Hossein
Bagheri visited Turkey last week. Erdogan on Monday said a joint operation with
Iran against Kurdish militants which "pose a threat," including the PKK, is
"always on the agenda." Iran's Revolutionary Guards, however, denied the claim.
N. Korea's Kim 'Starting to Respect U.S.', Says Trump
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 23/17/North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un is
"starting to respect" the United States, President Donald Trump declared, even
as Pyongyang revealed plans for its missile development Wednesday and Kim
ordered a production boost. Trump's remarks, at a rally in Phoenix, came hours
after Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said talks with the nuclear-armed North
over its banned weapons programs might be possible "in the near future."The
comments are a marked contrast to the rhetoric of recent weeks, when Trump spoke
of raining "fire and fury" on the North, and come as tensions have eased after
Kim pulled back from a plan to send a salvo of missiles towards the U.S. Pacific
territory of Guam. But Washington also imposed new sanctions on Chinese and
Russian firms suspected of doing business with the North. Pyongyang, meanwhile,
revealed significant technological advances in its missile programs and
ambitious plans to further improve its capabilities. On a visit to the Chemical
Material Institute of the Academy of Defense Science, Kim ordered stepped-up
production of rocket engines and intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM)
nosecones, state media reported. At a campaign-style rally in Phoenix, Trump
said his aggressive rhetoric was starting to bear fruit. "Some people said it
was too strong. It's not strong enough," he told thousands of supporters. "But
Kim Jong-Un, I respect the fact that I believe he is starting to respect us. I
respect that fact very much. "And maybe, probably not, but maybe something
positive can come about." Earlier Tillerson acknowledged Pyongyang's recent
"restraint" in not carrying out fresh nuclear or missile tests in response to
tough new United Nations sanctions, the seventh set imposed on it. "I am pleased
to see that the regime in Pyongyang has certainly demonstrated some level of
restraint that we've not seen in the past," Tillerson said at a rare press
conference, adding that talks may be possible "in the near future." U.S.
officials told AFP that Tillerson was not thanking Pyongyang, nor making any
concession on Washington's determination to halt Kim's missile program and
negotiate the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. The Trump
administration's rhetoric has been highly variable but Washington has said it
would be open to dialogue if Pyongyang took steps to calm tensions. In a
commentary earlier this week, the North's official Korean Central News Agency
described Trump as a "mad guy" who "frequently posts weird articles of his
ego-driven thoughts in his twitter and spouts rubbish."
Carbon compound
Tensions between North Korea and the United States and its allies soared last
month after Pyongyang tested two missiles that appeared to bring most of the
U.S. mainland within range. The North says it needs nuclear weapons to protect
itself against the U.S. -- it regards current joint military exercises by Seoul
and Washington as a rehearsal for an invasion. It has made rapid technological
strides under Kim, and released pictures Wednesday of a visit by him to the
Chemical Material Institute of the Academy of Defense Science, which develops
the North's missiles. Analysts said the images revealed major advances and
ambitions. Kim, in a black suit, was shown next to a large brown tube that
Joshua Pollack of the U.S. Middlebury Institute of International Studies said on
Twitter was a "wound fiber cylinder, evidently a large-diameter solid-rocket
motor casing in the making". Such casings are harder to manufacture than metal
ones but are much lighter, enabling longer ranges and heavier payloads. Other
pictures included missile schematics and what appeared to be production
processes. "We have diagrams and names on two apparent new solid fuel multistage
North Korean nuclear capable missiles," one of them an Intercontinental
Ballistic Missile and the other a medium- or intermediate-range device, said
independent missile and nuclear analyst George Herbert. The official Korean
Central News Agency said the nosecones and engine jets were made of
"carbon/carbon compound material", and that Kim "instructed the institute to
produce more solid-fuel rocket engines and rocket warhead tips." Many of the
elements on show were objectives rather than currently existing technology,
analysts said, but even so, Jeffrey Lewis, of the armscontrolwonk.com website,
noted: "It's all bad.""If I understand North Korean propaganda, this is their
way of telling us what we'll see in the air in the coming year." Trump has urged
Beijing, North Korea's only major ally, to bring greater pressure to bear in
reining in its neighbor's nuclear efforts, suggesting that the United States may
offer concessions on trade in return. On Tuesday the U.S. Treasury slapped
sanctions on 16 Chinese and Russian individuals and companies, accusing them of
supporting North Korea's weapons programs and attempting to evade U.S.
sanctions. Beijing said Wednesday the move "will not help the solution of the
problem," nor would it enhance mutual trust.
Yemen Rebels Warn Ally Saleh Will Pay in War of Words
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 23/17/Yemen's Huthi rebels on Wednesday
warned former president Ali Abdullah Saleh, their main ally in the country's
war, that he would "bear the consequences" after calling the Iran-backed rebels
"militias." Fears are now mounting that violence could break out in Sanaa around
a rally scheduled for Thursday to mark 35 years since the founding of Saleh's
General People's Congress party. Cracks began to surface this week in the
alliance between rebel chief Abdul Malik al-Huthi and strongman Saleh, allied
since 2014 against Yemen's government, with the two exchanging mutual
accusations of back-stabbing in televised speeches. A statement released by the
Huthis early Wednesday hit back at Saleh, calling the ex-president a "traitor"
after he dismissed the group as a "militia" in a speech on Sunday. "We have been
stabbed in the back and called a militia, which is treason in its purest form,"
read the statement. "What he (Saleh) said crosses the red line... and he will
have to bear the consequences of his words." Tension has been rising for days in
the Yemeni capital, which is jointly controlled by Saleh and the Huthis, and
eyewitnesses say armed supporters of Saleh and Huthi have intensified their
presence across the city.Yemen's war, which pits the Saudi-backed government
against the Saleh-Huthi alliance, has claimed thousands of lives since 2015 and
pushed the country to the brink of famine.
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on August 23-24/17
The new Iranian threat 'exposes the weakness
of the nuclear agreement'
Alexandra Lukash and Nir Cohen/Ynetnews/August
23/17
Analysis: Iran has declared that it needs only five days to enrich its uranium
to 20%, enabling it to produce nuclear weapons; Institute for National Security
Studies Senior Fellow, Dr. Landau, states that if this is true, 'it means that
within a few weeks they'll be able to reach a reasonable amount at an even
higher percentage—and then we'll have a problem.' Five days—this is the time
frame Iran said Tuesday it needs in order to ramp up its uranium enrichment to
20 percent, a level at which the material could be used for a nuclear weapon.
"If the Iranians can actually reach enriched uranium at 20 percent, it means
that within a few weeks they'll be able to reach a reasonable amount at an even
higher percentage—and then we'll have a problem," says Dr. Emily B. Landau,
senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) and head
of the Arms Control and Regional Security Program. "This is an Iranian attempt
to deter the Trump administration from imposing further sanctions and punitive
measures against their very provocative behavior," Landau added. "Even if the
Iranians cannot achieve that target within five days, we still have a problem
because Iran continues its aggressive path.
"You have to remember that such threats were also made during the time of Obama,
who as president did everything to calm Iran."Under the nuclear agreement signed
in 2015 with the group of six world powers (the United States, Russia, China,
Britain, France, and Germany), Iran relinquished most of its uranium enriched at
20 percent. "From the beginning, the agreement was problematic," said Landau.
"It is a weak agreement full of loopholes, and its problems are being exposed
one by one."We now understand that in a few weeks or months they'll be able to
stock up (on enriched Uranium—ed), so what did this agreement accomplish? And
what can be done against their threats? It is too late to cancel the agreement,
but it has to be reinforced by a number of clauses. "The attitude toward Iran's
behavior must be changed: missile tests, increased presence in Syria, the
transfer of weapons to Hezbollah, and the establishment of missile manufacturing
plants in Lebanon and Syria. All these things must be answered with
determination." According to Landau, "Iran is acting in a way that allows us to
predict its moves. The fact that it is rational does not mean that it is not
aggressive, or that it does not have an agenda of regional hegemony. We slowly
see how it expresses these (points). It spreads out, so that wherever anyone
else leaves—Iran enters. We see this in both Iraq and Syria. "This is a
dangerous regime for the Middle East," concluded Landau. "Not only for Israel,
but for all countries."
Can Greenblatt succeed where his predecessors failed?
Noam Tibon/Ynetnews/August 23/17
Op-ed: To succeed in his mission, Trump's Middle East envoy needs to create an
updated and revised version of the Saudi peace initiative by limiting the Right
of Return to the Palestinian state, removing the Golan from the equation, and
adding a comprehensive security plan.
The serious clashes on the Temple Mount and in the West Bank and the incident at
the Israeli embassy in Amman last month were US President Donald Trump's
administration's first foray into the deep end of the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict. The president's special envoy to the peace process, Jason Greenblatt,
traveled to the region to aid in resolving the crisis and got to see Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's outrageous
and irresponsible behavior up close.
The former capitulated to demands by Bayit Yehudi Head Naftali Bennett and
ignored the IDF and Shin Bet's recommendations on placing metal detectors at the
Temple Mount, while the latter announced the PA was stopping security
coordination with Israel at such an explosive and dangerous timing.
At the same time, Greenblatt saw how Jordan's King Abdullah resolved the crisis
by putting together the deal that led to the removal of the metal detectors and
the release of the Israeli embassy guard.
These events should serve as an important lesson for Greenblatt, a diligent and
smart man who takes his job seriously, as he returns to the region. If he wishes
to succeed, he must encourage more involvement by regional leaders in the peace
process. At the same time, he should make it clear to Netanyahu and Abbas that
he is not here to manage local crises or solve their political problems, but to
help reach a peace accord.
Everyone knows more or less how the peace deal would look like. The Saudi peace
initiative, which seems more relevant than ever in light of the recent changes
in the Middle East, is the most convenient basis for an agreement between
Israel, the Palestinians and the Arab world.
To succeed in his mission, Greenblatt needs to work to create an updated and
revised version of the initiative. Its basic principles—a Palestinian state in
the 1967 borders, land swaps, recognition of Israel by the entire Arab world,
and an agreed upon resolution on Jerusalem—were and remain the only formula to
resolving the conflict. However, there are several things Greenblatt can and
should add to the initiative to make it even more relevant and adjust it to fit
the current security climate.
The first, and most important, adjustment is making it clear to the Palestinians
and the Arab world there would be no Right of Return to Israeli territory. The
solution for the Palestinian refugees and their descendents should be found
within the borders of the Palestinian state.
Another fundamental change necessary is excluding the Golan Heights from the
equation: The original Saudi initiative includes Israeli withdrawal from the
Golan, but today the most reasonable and responsible move for the safety of all
countries in the region is the recognition of the Golan Heights as Israeli
territory. As part of significant progress in the peace process, the Arab states
would support such a decision.
An additional change, no less important, is adding an in-depth section on
security. For the citizens of Israel, this is the most important issue in any
agreement. Without strict and stable security arrangements, Israel would not be
able to make compromises on other issues. To that end, a comprehensive security
plan should be added to the existing initiative, similar to the one prepared by
US Gen. John Allen in 2013, which would include Israeli military presence in the
Jordan Valley for 15 years following the signing of the agreement, as well as
Israeli presence at border crossings. The Palestinian state would be
demilitarized: it wouldn't have an army, but it would have a well-trained police
force and internal security forces to ensure the stability of the government.
Israel would maintain control over the airspace.
There is already successful security cooperation between Israel, the Palestinian
Authority and Jordan. A peace agreement would allow to expand this cooperation,
improve upon it, and bring additional Middle East nations into in. This would
create a broad coalition against Iran, ISIS and other terror organizations.
Trump is committed to the war on terror, and in his talks with Arab leaders,
such as King Abdullah and President al-Sisi, they explicitly told him how much
an Israeli-Palestinian agreement could aid in achieving this fight.
Despite all of the media spins and lies, most of the Palestinians want to know
that at the end of the day they will have an independent Israel, while most
Israelis want to know Israel will remain a Jewish, democratic, strong and safe
country.
The strategic situation in the region today is the most conducive it has been in
years to making progress in the peace process. The Trump administration, which
has so far failed to reach any achievement it could be proud of—neither internal
nor international—needs to put its hope on Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.
Now, Greenblatt is put to the test: Will he be remembered as the mediator who
helped reach a breakthrough, or as another diplomat who failed and then wrote a
memoir about the experience?
**The writer is a major general in reserves.
Netanyahu meets with Putin, expresses concern over Iran's
role in Syria
Herb Keinon/Jerusalem Post/August 23, 2017
Iran's growing role in Syria poses a threat to Israel, the Middle East and the
world, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Russian President Vladimir
Putin on Wednesday. "Mr. President, with joint efforts we are defeating Islamic
State, and this is a very important thing. But the bad thing is, that where the
defeated Islamic State group vanishes, Iran is stepping in," Netanyahu told
Putin during talks at Russia's Black Sea resort of Sochi. "We cannot forget for
a single minute that Iran threatens every day to annihilate Israel," Netanyahu
said. "It (Iran) arms terrorist organizations, it sponsors and initiates
terror."
Netanyahu also said that "Iran is already well on its way to controlling Iraq,
Yemen and to a large extent in already in practice in control of Lebanon."
Iran denies sponsoring terrorism.
Putin, in the part of the meeting to which reporters had access, did not address
Netanyahu's remarks about Iran's role in Syria. Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu arrived in Sochi on Wednesday for a meeting with Russian President
Vladimir Putin, his fourth visit to Russia in the last 16 months.
For reporters who cover Netanyahu, the drill is well known. Following the
premier’s meeting with Putin, either he or one of his spokesmen will say that
during the meeting he stressed Israel’s red lines in Syria: that Jerusalem will
not tolerate an Iranian or Hezbollah presence on the Golan border; that Israel
will not accept a permanent Iranian presence in Syria; and that Israel will act
to ensure that game-changing weapons or capabilities are not transferred from
Iran through Syria to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Netanyahu will be careful to praise
the Russian-Israeli bilateral relations, and say that the deconfliction
mechanism to prevent any accidental engagements between the Russian and Israeli
air forces in Syrian skies – which he set up with Moscow immediately after
Russia became militarily involved in Syria in 2015 – has proven itself very
effective.
He will be careful not to say what the Russian leader’s response to any of this
was, beyond saying that the Israeli messages were “understood.”
But these meetings are by no means a Netanyahu monologue. The Russians also have
their position regarding Syria and overall Iranian intentions, and – based on a
number of conversations with senior Russian diplomats – it goes like this:
Russia has genuine interest in Syria. Raqqa, the one-time Islamic State
stronghold in northern Syria, is only 1,000 kilometers, or 620 miles, from
Grozny, Chechnya, in southern Russia, the distance from New York to Knoxville,
Tennessee. When Moscow decided to become actively engaged in the fighting in
Syria in the summer of 2015, there was a real danger that Islamic State and a
collection of other rebels would overthrow the government in Damascus, and the
country would fall under the sway of forces downright hostile to Russia –
someone like Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi – who might then want to
begin efforts through Chechnya to destabilize Russia.
Some 4,500 Russian citizens are fighting against the Islamists in Syria, and
have not concealed their desire to fight the “infidels” at home – meaning in
Russia – once victory is achieved in Syria and Iraq.
Unlike the US forces that invaded Iraq in 2003, or the international coalition
that launched airstrikes against Libya in 2011, Russia was invited into Syria by
the recognized government of Bashar Assad. Therefore, Russia – unlike the US and
the international coalition – is in accordance with international law by acting
inside Syria at the invitation of the legitimate government. If there is a mess
in the Middle East, it is not because Russia moved into Syria, but rather
because the US moved into Iraq, and then the West took action in Libya
unleashing all kinds of destabilizing forces throughout the region. The US says
that the aerial campaign against Libya was a great success, ousting a brutal
dictator in Muammar Gaddafi – but what kind of success?
Huge amounts of military hardware was pillaged, and vast amounts of weaponry and
even chemical substances have spilled over into neighboring African countries as
well as into the hands of Jihadi groups. Niger and Mali were destabilized
because of what happened in Libya.
Russia listens to Israel’s concerns about Iran, but views them as overstated.
Iran will not attack Israel, because it knows that to do so would be suicidal.
Israel and the Saudis say that Iran is trying to encircle them with proxies
stretching from Yemen through Bahrain, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, but the truth is
that the Iranians feel threatened and encircled by Israel, the Saudis and the
US. True, Israel does not threaten to wipe Iran off the map, but why has it
bought a fleet of F-35 stealth bombers? Whom is that intended for, if not Iran?
Moreover, the US talks openly about Iranian regime change. Even the nuclear deal
– the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action reached in 2015 – is seen by the
Americans as a way of “empowering the moderates “ to slowly edge out the
ayatollahs.
Iran’s actions in Syria are not designed to destabilize the region but rather to
protect themselves, to push back and take the battle to the enemy, rather than
waiting to become encircled themselves. We, the Russians, understand Israel’s
concerns about game-changing weaponry being transferred from Syria to Hezbollah,
and we acknowledge Israel’s right to defend itself. But Israel cannot
unilaterally take it upon itself to regulate relations between other sovereign
states – it is not the regional sheriff. We, the Russians, also understand
Israel’s concerns regarding Iran establishing a permanent presence in Syria, but
we cannot prevent it. Iran is a sovereign state; we can’t tell Tehran what to do
or how to behave. We might counsel against it, but they will not necessarily
listen to us. We don’t make the decisions for Iran. Iran is inside Syria because
Assad invited them in. The same is true of Hezbollah. The Iranians and Hezbollah
came in when Assad’s back was against the wall. It is now in Israel’s interest
for Assad to retain strong control of his country, so then there will be no need
for the Syrians to invite in outside forces. The best thing for Israel would be
a strong government in Damascus that will not need Iranian or Hezbollah help.
Israel should be working with the forces to empower Assad. To Israeli ears, much
of the above sounds almost delusional. Nevertheless, that is the Russian
message, one that their diplomats espouse consistently in private conversations,
and one that Netanyahu has heard in various forms more than once. He will also
likely hear a variation on this theme again from Putin when they meet Wednesday
in Sochi.
Two New Totalitarian Movements: Radical Islam and Political Correctness
A. Z. Mohamed/Gatestone Institute/August 23/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10883/political-correctness-radical-islam
The attempt in the West to impose a strict set of rules about what one is
allowed to think and express in academia and in the media -- to the point that
anyone who disobeys is discredited, demonized, intimidated and in danger of
losing his or her livelihood -- is just as toxic and just as reminiscent of
Orwell's diseased society.
The main facet of this PC tyranny, so perfectly predicted by George Orwell, is
the inversion of good and evil -- of victim and victimizer. In such a universe,
radical Muslims are victimized by the West, and not the other way around. This
has led to a slanted teaching of the history of Islam and its conquests, both as
a justification of the distortion and as a reflection of it.
Thought-control is necessary for the repression of populations ruled by despotic
regimes. That it is proudly and openly being used by self-described liberals and
human-rights advocates in free societies is not only hypocritical and shocking;
it is a form of aiding and abetting regimes whose ultimate goal is to eradicate
Western ideals.
Political correctness (PC) has been bolstering radical Islamism. This influence
was most recently shown again in an extensive exposé by the Clarion Project in
July 2017, which demonstrates the practice of telling "deliberate lies while
genuinely believing in them in order to forget any fact that has become
inconvenient" -- or, as George Orwell called it in his novel, 1984,
"Doublespeak."
This courtship and marriage between the Western chattering classes and radical
Muslim fanatics was elaborated by Andrew C. McCarthy in his crucial 2010 book,
The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America.
Since then, this union has strengthened. Both the United States and the rest of
the West are engaged in a romance with forces that are, bluntly, antagonistic to
the values of liberty and human rights.
To understand this seeming paradox, one needs to understand what radical
Islamism and PC have in common. Although Islamism represents all that PC
ostensibly opposes -- such as the curbing of free speech, the repression of
women, gays and "apostates" -- both have become totalitarian ideologies.
The totalitarian nature of radical Islamism is more obvious than that of Western
political correctness -- and certainly more deadly. Sunni terrorists, such as
ISIS and Hamas -- and Shiites, such as Hezbollah and its state sponsor, Iran --
use mass murder to accomplish their ultimate goal of an Islamic Caliphate that
dominates the world and subjugates non-Muslims.
The attempt in the West, however, to impose a strict set of rules about what one
is allowed to think and express in academia and in the media -- to the point
that anyone who disobeys is discredited, demonized, intimidated and in danger of
losing his or her livelihood -- is just as toxic and just as reminiscent of
Orwell's view of a diseased society.
These rules are not merely unspoken ones. Quoting a Fox News interview with
American columnist Rachel Alexander, the Clarion Project points out that the
Associated Press -- whose stylebook is used as a key reference by a majority of
English-language newspapers worldwide for uniformity of grammar, punctuation and
spelling -- is now directing writers to avoid certain words and terms that are
now deemed unacceptable to putative liberals.
Alexander recently wrote: "Even when individual authors do not adhere to the
bias of AP Style, it often doesn't matter. If they submit an article to a
mainstream media outlet, they will likely see their words edited to conform. A
pro-life author who submits a piece taking a position against abortion will see
the words 'pro-life' changed to 'anti-abortion,' because the AP Stylebook
instructs, 'Use anti-abortion instead of pro-life and pro-abortion rights
instead of pro-abortion or pro-choice.' It goes on, 'Avoid abortionist,' saying
the term 'connotes a person who performs clandestine abortions.'
"Words related to terrorism are sanitized in the AP Stylebook. Militant, lone
wolves or attackers are to be used instead of terrorist or Islamist. 'People
struggling to enter Europe' is favored over 'migrant' or 'refugee.' While it's
true that many struggle to enter Europe, it is accurate to point out that they
are, in fact, immigrants or refugees."
To be sure, the AP Stylebook does not carry the same weight or authority as the
Quranic texts on which radical Islamists base their jihadist actions and
totalitarian aims. It does constitute, however, a cultural decree that has
turned religious in its fervor. It gives a glimpse, as well, into the
intellectual tyranny that has pervaded liberal Western thought and institutions.
The main facet of this PC tyranny, so perfectly predicted by Orwell, is the
inversion of good and evil -- of victim and victimizer. In such a universe,
radical Muslims are victimized by the West, and not the other way around. This
has led to a slanted teaching of the history of Islam and its conquests, both as
a justification of the distortion and as a reflection of it.
As far back as 2003, the Middle East Forum reported on the findings of a study
conducted by the American Textbook Council, an independent New York-based
research organization, which stated:
"[Over the last decade], the coverage of Islam in world history textbooks has
expanded and in some respects improved.... But on significant Islam-related
subjects, textbooks omit, flatter, embellish, and resort to happy talk,
suspending criticism or harsh judgments that would raise provocative or even
alarming questions."
Thought-control is necessary for the repression of populations ruled by despotic
regimes. That it is proudly and openly being used by self-described liberals and
human-rights advocates in free societies is not only hypocritical and shocking;
it is a form of aiding and abetting regimes whose ultimate goal is to eradicate
Western ideals. The relationship between the two must be recognized for what it
is: a marriage made in hell.
**A. Z. Mohamed is a Muslim born and raised in the Middle East.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Iran vs. Turkey, the MidEast’s Perpetual Rivalry
Daniel Pipes Washington Times August 23, 2017
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=58086
W.T. title: “Middle East rivalry between Iran and Turkey interminable”
News that Iran’s and Turkey’s governments reached an accord on Idlib, a Syrian
town now the focus of American interests, brings relations between the two of
the largest and most influential states in the Middle East momentarily out of
the shadows.
Their rivalry goes back a half-millennium, included eleven wars, and now
remains, in the words of the Washington Institute’s Soner Cagaptay, the region’s
“oldest power game.” What does the recent accord signify and how will their
competition influence the region’s future?
Iranian and Turkish parallels are noteworthy. Both countries have populations of
80 million. (Egypt, the region’s third large country, has 96 million.) Both
boast ancient civilizations, long imperial histories, tensions with Russia, and
a successful avoidance of European colonialism. In modern times, each came under
the rule of a ruthless modernizer after World War I, followed more recently by
an even more repressive Islamist.
Ruthless modernizers: Iran’s Reza Shah (L) visited Atatürk in 1934.
The current leaders, Iran’s Ali Khamene’i and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdoğan,
enjoy near-absolute power and both feverishly try to hide this reality under a
large and noisy apparatus of elections, parliaments, cabinets, laws, and NGOs.
Both aspire to lead the entire Muslim community, perhaps someday claiming to be
caliph. In an era of muted anti-Zionism from Arab states, Tehran and Ankara now
lead the charge, with the Islamic Republic of Iran loudly denying the Holocaust
and the Republic of Turkey comparing Israelis to Nazis.
Even more repressive Islamists: Turkey’s Erdoğan (L) visited Khamene’i in 2012.
In several ways, Iranians lead Turks, but the latter are catching up. Ayatollah
Khomeini came to power in 1979 and Erdoğan in 2002. Iran has long enjoyed
massive oil and gas reserves but Turkey recently built an impressive economic
base. Tehran deploys forces abroad, dominating four Arab capitals, while Ankara
still fights domestic opponents, especially Gülenists and Kurds. Both
governments despise the West but Iran’s is openly hostile while Turkey’s
formally remains in NATO and ostensibly seeks European Union membership.
Khamene’i’s thugs capture American sailors on the high seas while Erdoğan’s
takes residents hostage. Conspiracy theories, long an Iranian art form, have
made huge strides over the past two decades in Turkey, which may now boast the
region’s most fantastical speculations. Both became enthusiastic allies of
Venezuela’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro. As a longer-established dictatorship,
Khamene’i can allow relative freedom of expression compared with Erdoğan’s
obsessive desire to control, including what basketball players in the United
States say or what travelers transitingthrough Istanbul airport think.
Their most major difference concerns the attitudes of their subjects. Whereas
Khamene’i enjoys the support of only about 15 percent of the populace, Erdoğan
can count on some 45 percent, affording Erdoğan a legitimacy and confidence that
Khamene’i can only dream of. In part, this results from longevity under Islamist
rule, in part from difference in per capita income, which is only US$4,700 and
stagnant in Iran, $10,700 and rising in Turkey.
Select economic indicators (World Bank).
Regime collapse in Iran is within sight and will diminish Islamism, encouraging
Muslims to move toward a more modern and moderate form of their religion. The
Turkish government’s greater popularity and more advanced version of Islamism
gives it greater staying power that makes it the more worrisome long-term
opponent. Thus, the Middle East is likely to witness a grand switch, with Iran
on course to moderation and Turkey becoming the region’s supreme danger.
Bilateral relations flourished during the first years of Erdoğan’s rule
(2002-10), when they shared a Islamist worldview and a suspicion of U.S.
intentions in Iraq. But relations then soured, primarily because both regimes
seek foreign influence and, as neighbors, they inevitably clash. The civil war
in Syria, where Tehran backs Shi’ite-oriented jihadis and Ankara backs Sunni
jihadis, is their biggest but not only problem. Other matters also aggravate
relations, such as their supporting opposing sides in Yemen, Turkish installing
a NATO radar tracking Iranian activities, and Iranian support for Al-Qaeda
against Turkey.
Tensions have reached the point that Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group
finds Tehran and Ankara “on a collision course.” Left unchecked, he expects the
present dynamics to point “toward greater bloodshed, growing instability and
greater risks of direct … military confrontation.” More poetically, Cagaptay
observes that the Middle East has room for “one shah or sultan, but not a shah
and a sultan.”
In this context, the Idlib accord looks flimsy and transient. Tehran and Ankara
will probably soon turn against each other and with renewed vigor continue their
perpetual rivalry.
Washington Times illustration.
**Mr. Pipes (DanielPipes.org, @DanielPipes) is president of the Middle East
Forum. © 2017 by Daniel Pipes. All rights reserved.
Palestinians: Taking Journalists Hostage
Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/August 23/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10891/palestinians-journalists-hostages
Hamas and Abbas have turned Palestinian journalists into weapons in their
internecine war. Palestinian journalists are now being targeted not only for
expressing their views and reporting in a way that angers their leaders; they
are also arrested and tortured in the process of the settling of scores between
Abbas and Hamas.
The Palestinians indeed live under two dictatorial regimes, where freedom of
expression and freedom of the media are violated on a daily basis.
By taking journalists hostage, the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Hamas have
demonstrated that they are operating more as militias than as governments. We
have before us a preview of the deadly drama of any future Palestinian state.
Palestinian journalists have once again fallen victim to the continuing power
struggle between the Palestinian Authority (PA), which has jurisdiction over
parts of the West Bank, and Hamas, the Islamist movement that is in control of
the entire Gaza Strip.
Neither the PA nor Hamas is any champion of human rights, especially freedom of
the media. The two parties regularly crack down on their critics, including
journalists who do not toe the line or dare to report on issues that are deemed
as reflecting negatively on the PA or Hamas.
The past few weeks have been particularly tough for Palestinian journalists. In
this period, several journalists found themselves behind bars in PA and Hamas
prisons, while others were summoned for interrogation and had to spend hours in
interrogation rooms facing and detention centers.
To make matters even worse, a new Cyber Crime Law passed by the PA paves the way
for legal measures against Facebook and Twitter users who post critical or
unflattering comments about President Abbas and his senior officials. Critics
say the law is a grave assault on freedom of expression and it will be used as a
tool in the hands of Abbas and his henchmen to silence their critics or throw
them into prison. In addition, the PA has blocked more than 20 news websites
that are affiliated with Hamas and Mohammed Dahlan, an ousted Fatah leader who
has long openly challenged Abbas.
The PA-Hamas war is hardly a secret. The two entities use every available method
to bring each other down. Abbas's PA has not hesitated to take extreme measures
against the two million Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip. These measures
include depriving the Gaza Strip of medical supplies, electricity and fuel, as
well as forcing thousands of PA civil servants into early retirement and cutting
off salaries to thousands of others.
Hamas's retaliatory capacity towards the PA for these punitive steps is limited
-- by Israel. Fortunately for Abbas and the PA, Israel is sitting in the middle
between the West Bank and the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.
Had Israel not been so situated, Hamas and its Gaza Strip followers would have
marched into the West Bank and taken over Ramallah, the de facto capital of the
Palestinian Authority, and overthrown Abbas's PA.
In the absence of options, Hamas has sought help from Abbas's arch-enemy, the
ousted Fatah official Mohammed Dahlan, who has been living in exile in the
United Arab Emirates for the past six years.
Dahlan has caused Abbas many sleepless nights; Abbas has developed a particular
paranoia against Dahlan. Abbas believes that Dahlan has only one goal: to remove
him from power and end his regime. Abbas may not be wrong.
Hamas is now prepared to swallow a condition it has been trying to avoid for a
long time: an alliance with Dahlan, a man it has despised for two full decades.
What is Hamas hoping to gain from this reluctant alliance? Given Dahlan's strong
ties with Egypt and some wealthy Gulf countries, Hamas is probably hoping for an
end to its isolation in the Gaza Strip.
While awaiting the return of its presumptive "savior," Dahlan, Hamas, which is
beginning to feel the impact of Abbas's sanctions against the Gaza Strip, has
bared its fangs towards journalists, who are not known for their sympathy for
the Islamist rulers there.
In a bid to exert pressure on Abbas to halt his punitive measures, Hamas's
"Internal Security Apparatus" arrested Fuad Jaradeh, a correspondent for the
PA's Palestine TV in the Gaza Strip. The charge? "Security-related offenses."
Palestinian journalists and family members take a different view of the
incarceration, however. In their view, the arrest was aimed at pressuring Abbas
to backtrack on his sanctions against the Gaza Strip. Abbas is indeed hoping
that the sanctions will drive Palestinians in the Gaza Strip to revolt and bring
down Hamas.
The 82-year-old PA president remains mired in the humiliation he suffered when
Hamas expelled the PA from the Gaza Strip in the summer of 2007.
Abbas holds a personal grudge against Hamas because he also believes that before
expelling the PA from the Gaza Strip, Hamas had planned to assassinate him by
detonating explosives in a tunnel under his motorcade. The alleged plot was
foiled when a Hamas official defected and revealed the plan to Abbas.
So, the Palestine TV correspondent, Jaradeh, was actually taken hostage by
Hamas. Several operatives belonging to Abbas's ruling Fatah faction in the Gaza
Strip were also targeted by Hamas, which detained some or summoned them for
lengthy interrogation.
Enraged by the Hamas measures, Abbas ordered a crackdown on journalists employed
by Hamas-affiliated media outlets in the West Bank. The result was that seven
journalists found themselves in detention on charges of working for "hostile and
unauthorized" media organizations.
This charge is transparently absurd, because Hamas-affiliated television
stations and news websites have been operating under Abbas's PA for years.
Besides, all the journalists rounded up by Abbas's security forces have been
working in public and their identities are well known to his security forces.
The arrest of the seven journalists was a direct effort to squeeze Hamas into
releasing the television correspondent, Jaradeh.
In other words, the Palestinian Authority took the seven journalists hostage in
order to secure the release of its own newsman from a Hamas prison. The PA
certainly did not awaken one morning and discover that there are
Hamas-affiliated journalists and media organizations in the West Bank. It is not
even charging the journalists with membership in Hamas.
As it turned out, the PA hostage-taking paid off, and Hamas was forced to
release Jaradeh after 70 days in detention. In return, the PA security forces
released six of the seven journalists, who were even allowed to return to their
jobs and resume their work under the PA. Suddenly, these journalists were no
longer a security threat and their working places were no longer "hostile" and
"unlicensed."
After their release from Abbas's prisons eight days later, the journalists who
had been held hostage talked about having undergone physical and verbal abuse.
Mahmoud Hamamreh, one of the released journalists, recounted:
"Some of us were beaten and humiliated. We were held in tiny cells and treated
as criminals. The officer in charge of the investigation told us that we were
being held hostage until Hamas releases journalists it is holding."
Several journalists, allegedly affiliated with Hamas, speak at an August 16
press conference about the physical and verbal abuse they suffered while held in
detention by the Palestinian Authority. (Image source: Roya News video
screenshot)
Hamas and Abbas have turned Palestinian journalists into weapons in their
internecine war. Palestinian journalists are now being targeted not only for
expressing their views and reporting in a way that angers their leaders; they
are also arrested and tortured in the process of the settling of scores between
Abbas and Hamas.
The Palestinians indeed live under two dictatorial regimes, where freedom of
expression and freedom of the media are violated on a daily basis. By taking
journalists hostage, the PA and Hamas have demonstrated that they are operating
more as militias than as governments. We have before us a preview of the deadly
drama of any future Palestinian state.
**Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist, is based in Jerusalem.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute
The President Has a Special Obligation to Condemn Nazis and
KKK
Alan M. Dershowitz/Gatestone Institute/August 23/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10892/condemn-racists
President Donald Trump has a special obligation to single out for condemnation,
and distance himself from, individuals and groups that claim -- even if falsely
-- to speak in his name, as the racist provocateurs in Charlottesville did.
I also believe that it is the special responsibility of decent liberals to do
the same with regard to hard left bigoted extremists. As a liberal, I will not
give these hard-left violent bigots a pass.
So, President Trump must stop being even handed in his condemnations. He should
focus his condemnation on extreme right-wing bigots who speak and act in his
name, and leave it to those of us on the left to focus our condemnation on
left-wing extremists and bigots.
All decent Americans have an obligation to condemn the violent bigotry of the
Nazi and KKK demonstrators in Charlottesville or wherever else they spew their
poisonous and threatening rhetoric. But President Donald Trump has a special
obligation to single out for condemnation, and distance himself from,
individuals and groups that claim -- even if falsely -- to speak in his name, as
the racist provocateurs in Charlottesville did.
David Duke, the notorious bigot, told reporters that white nationalists were
working to "fulfil the promises of Donald Trump." Richard Spencer, the founder
of the Daily Stormer (a not so coded homage to the Nazi publication Der Stürmer,)
attributed the growth of the ultra-nationalist alt-right to the Trump
Presidency: "Obviously the alt-right has come very far in the past two years in
terms of public exposure... is Donald Trump one of the major causes of that? Of
course."
Trump initially responded as follows: "We must ALL be united and condemn all
that hate stands for. There is no place for this kind of violence in America."
But then, following the car ramming that killed a peaceful protestor, President
Trump made the following statement: "We condemn in the strongest possible terms
this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides -- on many
sides."
President Trump's inclusion of the words "violence on many sides" -- which
seemed improvised -- suggested to some a moral equivalence between the Nazis and
the KKK, on the one hand, and those protesting and resisting them, on the other
hand. Trump denied that he was suggesting any such equivalence and made the
following statement:
"Racism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and
thugs, including KKK, Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists, and other hate groups are
repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans. Those who spread violence in
the name of bigotry strike at the very core of America."
But then a day later he seemed to double down on his attempt to be even-handed
in his comments about the "many sides" of this conflict. He pointed to "very
fine people on both sides," implying that Nazis and Klansmen could be "fine,"
because their protests were "very legal." Then he denounced "alt-left" groups
that were "very, very violent." Once again, he blamed "both sides," and asked
rhetorically, "what about the 'alt-left', that as you say, came charging at the
alt-right? Don't they have any semblance of guilt?"
David Duke immediately praised President Trump's condemnation of the "alt-left,"
thanking him "for your honesty & courage to tell the truth about
#Charlottesville & condemn the leftist terrorists in BLM/Antifa."
Finally (though nothing this President ever tweets is final), President Trump
praised the anti-racist "protestors in Boston who are speaking out against
bigotry and hate."
It is against this background that the President's back and forth statements
must be evaluated.
Even if it were true -- and the evidence is to the contrary -- that Black Lives
Matter and Antifa were as blameworthy for Charlottesville as the Nazis and KKK,
it would still be incumbent on President Trump to focus his condemnation
especially on the violent racists on the right that claim to speak on his
behalf. The hard left -- which does, in part, include some violent and bigoted
elements -- does not purport to speak on the President's behalf and does not
claim to be trying to "fulfil the promises of Donald Trump." To the contrary,
they oppose everything he stands for.
This situation poses a delicate dilemma for President Trump. He has denounced
the ideology of the violent racists on the alt-right who claim to be acting in
his name -- not quickly or forcefully enough. And he has declared his opposition
to "racism" and specifically to "those who cause violence in its name," whom he
has called "criminals" and "thugs." He specifically included within these
categories the "KKK, Neo-Nazis [and] White Supremacists," the very groups that
purport to speak in his name.
Why is that not enough? Why should he not at the same time condemn the alt-left
for its violence? These are reasonable questions that require nuanced answers.
Let me try to provide some.
I have long believed that it is the special responsibility of decent
conservatives to expose, condemn and marginalize hard-right extremists and
bigots. William F. Buckley showed the way when he refused to defend Patrick
Buchanan against charges that what he had said amounted to anti-Semitism. Other
decent conservatives followed Buckley's lead, and marginalized anti-Semites and
racists who expressed bigotry in the false name of conservatism.
I also believe that it is the special responsibility of decent liberals to do
the same with regard to hard-left bigoted extremists. I must acknowledge, as a
liberal, that we have not done as good a job as decent conservatives have done.
Perhaps this is because hard-left extremists often march under banners of
benevolence, whereas, hard-rights extremists tend not to hide their malevolence.
Consider, for example, Antifa, the radical hard-left group, some of whose
members violently confronted the Nazis and Klansmen in Charlottesville. As
reported by the New York Times, the organization is comprised of a "diverse
collection of anarchists, communists and socialists" with its "antecedents in
Germany and Italy." According to the Times, "Its adherents express disdain for
mainstream liberal politics" and support "direct action" by which they mean
"using force and violence," rather than free speech and civil disobedience.
Their leaders claim that violence is necessary because "it's full on war."
Nor is this merely rhetoric. On university campuses, particularly at Berkeley,
"black-clad protestors, some of whom identified themselves as Antifa, smashed
windows, threw gasoline bombs and broke into campus buildings, causing $100,000
in damage." They model themselves on the "Weathermen" of the 1970s, who were
responsible for numerous acts of violence.
They claim to be using "counter-violence" in defense against the violence of
neo-Nazis and Klansmen, but that is not true. They also use violence to shut
down speakers with whose worldviews they disagree: they include not only
right-wing extremists, but also mainstream conservatives, moderate Zionists and
even some liberals. They reject dialogue in favor of intimidation and force.
As a liberal, I will not give these hard-left violent bigots a pass. It is true
that the Nazis and KKK are currently more dangerous in terms of physical
violence than hard-left groups. (It is also true that the most violent groups by
far are radical Islamic terrorists, who are not the targets of Antifa protests.)
But the violence of racists on the right (and radical jihadists) must not lead
us to ignore the reality that Antifa and its radical allies pose real danger to
the future of our nation, because of their increasing influence on university
campuses, where our future leaders are being educated. The recent events in
Charlottesville and elsewhere have made them heroes among some mainstream
liberals, who are willing to excuse their anti-liberal bigotry because they are
on the barricades against fascism.
It's far too easy to self-righteously condemn your political enemies when they
step (or leap) over the line to bigotry and violence. It's far more difficult to
condemn those who share your wing, whether left or right, but who go too far.
But that is what morality and decency require, as Buckley taught us.
So, President Trump must stop being even-handed in his condemnations. He should
focus his condemnation on extreme right-wing bigots who speak and act in his
name, and leave it to those of us on the left to focus our condemnation on
left-wing extremists and bigots.
**Alan M. Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard
Law School and author of Taking the Stand: My Life in the Law. His new book,
Trumped Up: How Criminalization of Political Differences Endangers Democracy, is
now available.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Pyongyang cheers on Bashar al-Assad
Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/August 23/17
Some recent news items have mentioned a 37-page UN confidential report, which
has been leaked to the press. The report talks about violations of sanctions
imposed on North Korea. The report notes that two North Korean shipments were
sent to a Syrian government agency responsible for the country’s chemical
weapons program and that they have been intercepted during the past six months.
The last thing Bashar al-Assad needed was to add Pyongyang’s dictator to his
list of political affiliations. Despite all that, Stephane de Mistura, continues
to host international delegates even after seven rounds of talks in Geneva and
promises of more to come. This is in spite of the Russians, Turks and tours to
Astana in Kazakhstan. Stepping away from the Syrian Opposition’s inability to
unify its control after the West had forced the “true” opposition to “engage” in
Moscow’s platform – Kadri Jamil’s group, who’s a “nicer” opposition for Bashar
and his mouthpiece Walid al-Moualem to digest. Putting aside all the global
attention on the Syrian issue, it is worth shedding light on some figures, which
are the outcome of Western policies and the Russian-Iranian support for Bashar
al-Assad.
Even if Bashar remains popular in the palace of the Zionists, he will not remain
so in the conscience of the Syrian people
Ravages of war
Here are some figures that give us a sense of the scale of destruction caused in
Syria. Only 43 percent of Syrian hospitals are in operation, while half of the
Syrian doctors have fled the country. Some 80,000 children in Syria suffer from
polio, which was eradicated from the country in 1995. One out of every four
schools is either damaged, destroyed or used for those displaced as a result the
conflict. Around 6.3 million people have been internally displaced while close
to five million are refugees outside the country. The Syrian conflict has so far
caused damages worth $275 billion.
These are only a handful of figures that reflect the Syrian tragedy. Who else
can be held responsible for such an outcome but Bashar himself, followed by Iran
and Russia. Then comes the weakness of Western policy and some Arabs’ collusion
with Bashar. The tragic turn of events have made Alon Ben-Meir, Professor at the
Center for Global Affairs – NYU School of Professional Studies, describe them as
the “Syria: A Testament To International Moral Bankruptcy.” “The US was the only
country that could have spared this horror, under the Obama administration,”
Ben-Meir says. These figures do not challenge Ayatollah Khamenei’s conscience,
who was quoted by Qasim Soleimani, his envoy for strife and murder, as saying
that we are going to defend the dictators. “Do we look to any ruler of the
countries to which we have relations; is he a dictator or not? We cater to our
interests,” the leader is reported to have replied. Even if Bashar remains
popular in the palace of the Zionists, he will not remain so in the conscience
of the Syrian people. This is the conscience that will sooner or later produce
another revolution ... with de Mistura’s permission.
Vehicle terrorism, the up and running modern militant tool
Dr. Halla Diyab/Al Arabiya/August 23/17
The recent appalling Barcelona terror attacks, which involved a white van
smashing into people on Las Ramblas leaving 13 people dead and over 100 injured,
and an Audi A3 car ploughing into pedestrians in the popular seaside resort town
of Cambrils, leads to question whether we are witnessing a significant rise in
vehicle terrorism. This has been a new trend of street violence that challenges
the authorities’ preventive strategies and carries out mass terror and
collective murder. Using a vehicle is also a platform of modern militancy’s
cultural expression and becomes a transnational phenomenon of terror – a
hardcore element within the masses of exuberant militants that spilled blood and
fear on our streets from Britain to Nice, Barcelona, and beyond. It is, however,
necessary to look beyond the recurring use of the vehicle and explore its
symbolic connotation as a territorial medium of violence with immediate and
accurate effect of violating physical spaces, invading bodily and spatial
boundaries and territories, and bypassing the secrecy normally attached to any
militants attack.
A new identity
The use of a vehicle as a terror weapon is giving modern militancy a new
identity, and offering a communal trend among ISIS militants that differs in
essence to the conventional methods of terrorism performed by its preceding
groups like al-Qaeda. Although 9/11 attack utilized a “vehicle” – the Boeing 767
which crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center – but it was more
of a attack on a larger scale targeting the economy and the legacy of the United
States. Civilians were the causalities but not the main target. Barcelona’s
attack targeted mainly random non-combatants civilians to terrorize and mutilate
them. The use of the vehicle in Barcelona serves the militants “mutilation”
strategy. From beheading to stabbing, from using machetes and knives to
ploughing crowds with a van, the group’s terrorist dynamic has always been about
bodily mutilation. As the narrative of militant new trends unfold, the
conventional suicide bombing where militants are expected to offer up their
bodies to ISIS as vessels for explosives is now twisted by using the vehicle,
which facilitates using the victims’ bodies as vessels for mutilation to serve
the cause. This twist acquires the militants’ embryonic dynamic to depart from
ideological conventional roles as to acquire a role in the modern militant
syndicate. Militants like Barcelona’s Driss Oukabir, who has a criminal record,
and Khalid Masood of Westminster attack, who was convicted of multiple offences
spanning 20 years, rejuvenate the old phenomenon of phansigars. The “thuggee or
tuggee” known through history with their bloody terror, operating as gangs of
rubbery, tricking and strangling their preys. They were featured in Ziyā-ud-Dīn
Baranī's History of Fīrūz Shāh, dated around 1356. The war against terror is
territorial because ISIS is not an ideological rhetoric but rather a militant
group that will keep targeting our streets
Secret cult
While thuggee was a secret cult whose members worshipped Kali, the deity of
destruction, the modern militants of Barcelona yet operate in groups. They are
more of cult of assassins serving ISIS ideology of collective destruction and
mass murder, and they differ from al-Qaeda precedents of suicide bombers. A
similar syndicate was used by London Bridge militant-trio who ploughed into
pedestrians on the bridge using a hired van, before stabbing revelers in pubs
and bars in Borough Market on Saturday night killing seven people and injuring
48. This explains the recurring use of fake suicide belts by Barcelona and
London bridge militants to visualize their progressions from the bounds of
traditional old-school generation of suicide bombers, and mark their thuggee
syndicate. There is a territorial element to ISIS’s modern vehicle terrorism
symbolized either by using territorial weapons or targeting territories that of
a symbolic significance to their existence. Territorially Spain holds an
important place in the extremist ideology due to its symbolic legacy where
Muslims ruled over a period of 800 years before been forced out.
So it is no coincidence that the Spanish coastal town where the second Barcelona
attack took place was also the place where two of the masterminds of 9/11 met in
2001. However, ISIS’s territorial battle includes seeing Spain as part of its
final caliphate, like it was in the 15th century.
The battle of Spain and the loss of Andalusia have featured in ISIS’
publication, and attacking Spain symbolizes for the group a territorial invasion
and at the same time a triumph in parallel to the group’s recent territorial
defeat in the so called Caliphate’s two main strongholds of Mosul and Raqqa.
Unlike al-Qaeda, the group’s militancy is territorial not ideological.
Territorial facet
As a cult, they thrive on savage militancy rather on ideological devotion, and
their current atrocities in Barcelona is an example of how militant violence has
grown to be an outward territorial facet of ISIS. The group’s physical methods
of terrorism is by no means far harder to predict but also that far harder to
prevent. However, restricting cars’ and vans’ driving into pedestrian designated
areas, and points of crowd’s attraction could minimize the risk of vehicle
terrorism. But with the brutality of the terrorist group is growing to thrive on
small scale atrocities, it is difficult to predict what territorial weapon they
will resort to next. The recurring vehicle methods of terrorism imply that we
have not learned the lesson yet, and states’ policies fail to see that the war
against terrorism in all its facets is not only ideological war which can be
deterred by a preventive strategy or empowering community cohesion. The war
against terror is territorial because ISIS is not an ideological rhetoric but
rather a militant group that will keep targeting our streets harder, bigger and
bloodier.
Trump, the media and the right wing
Ahmad al-Farraj/Al Arabiya/August 23/17
Much of the US media appears biased against US President Donald Trump and seeks
to overstate his relations with the far right. At present the media seems to be
projecting views of entrenched state institutions which oppose Trump because he
is not part of the so-called ‘deep state’ and owes little to the strong lobbies
pushing their dubious agendas in Washington. Trump was elected by the average
Americans who felt that the US state establishment did not care about them or
their concerns and sought to serve its own interests often at their expense.
Most former US presidents since World War II - such as Ronald Reagan, George
Bush, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama - were leaders backed by the deep state, who
cared more about serving corporate interests than the welfare of the American
people. These people voted for Trump because they saw in him a savior who could
rescue them from crony capitalism which infests the deep state
Coming up trumps
In fact, the ‘establishment’ had not expected a Trump win in the presidential
elections and was unaware of the extent of the prevailing public discontent.
Therefore, media outlets did not mind giving Trump due coverage. However, Trump
and his electoral team were fully aware of the extent of the popular resentment
against the existing state of politics. Trump directly addressed the people
through his Twitter account and his electoral rallies. He could tap at the
public anger against the prevailing status quo and spoke in a manner that
resonated with the masses. He directly addressed the American people and managed
to assure them that he would uphold their rights against the machinations of the
so-called ‘deep state’. The fact that Trump was in with a chance in the US
presidential race dawned pretty late on the entrenched government institutions.
All attempts by the media to distort Trump’s image failed as his popularity rose
among the people who were frustrated with conventional politics and corporate
media machinery. Trump’s message resonated with the White citizenry as well as
the middle and lower classes in particular. But can we dub all these Trump
supporters as belonging to the far right, as claimed by the leftist media?
The slur of racism
It is true that the extreme right-wing supported Trump in the elections and that
it continues to support him. However, his support base does not constitute
neo-Nazis or members of the Ku Klux Klan – which if at all may only form a small
fraction of Trump’s supporters – but mainly average Americans who despise
extremist organizations and reject any violent and discriminatory beliefs. These
people voted for Trump because they saw in him a savior who could rescue them
from crony capitalism which infests the deep state. They hoped he would stand
true to his promises and improve the economic situation. In the wake of the
recent spurt in racist attacks, the US media has claimed that most Trump
supporters are racists and have gone to the extent of calling Trump a racist.
This allegation is not based on facts as right-wing groups have indulged in
racist attacks even during the terms of previous presidents and were involved in
heinous crimes similar to what recently happened in Virginia. Back then, the
media did not play up the incidents to the extent it is doing now because it was
more favourable towards presidents of that time or its bias was not as
pronounced against them as it is against Trump at present.
President Trump and the Palestinian issue
Dr. Ali Al-Ghamdi/Al Arabiya/August 23/17
There is no doubt that Palestine is one of the most complicated problems on the
face of the earth. There are not many other problems that have caused such wars
as have been fought over Palestine. There are not many people who have been
subjected to so much injustice, persecution, murder and displacement as have the
Palestinians. The people of Palestine have been expelled from their land, have
been victims of massacre, and have been forced to flee their homeland and take
shelter in neighboring countries. A large number of them are languishing in
refugee camps in miserable conditions with the hope that their rights will be
restored to them one day and that the conscience of the global community will
bring them international justice.There are currently reports that US President
Donald Trump will send a delegation to the Middle East to enhance the chances
for peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Trump is sending his son-in-law
Jared Kushner, accompanied by Special Representative for Foreign Affairs and
Advisor on Middle East Peace Jason Greenblatt, and Deputy National Security
Advisor Dina Powell, to Middle East countries with the aim of resolving the
Middle East conflict.
This mission is part of Trump’s attempt to find a solution after his realization
that the problems in the Middle East are interdependent and hence require
interrelated solutions. There have been several opportunities to resolve the
conflict in the past but all ended in failure. In such a scenario, Trump is
apparently determined to give a further push to resolving the Middle East issue.
According to sources, the delegation does not have any specific formula to
resolve the crisis. The proposals it will make are of a general nature. The
delegation will hold consultations and examine the directions issued to the two
parties to return to the negotiating table and start implementing
confidence-building measures. President Trump as well as his administration and
envoys can do a lot to help resolve the Mideast issue
Halt to incitement
President Trump’s instructions to Palestinians include a total halt to
incitement against Israel. The US Congress also favors making such a demand to
the Palestinians. It is noteworthy that the Foreign Relations Committee of
Congress has endorsed a law suspending US aid to the Palestinian Authority.
While making these demands on Palestinians, the president has not issued any
reference or criticism of Israel’s continued expansion of settlements and
Judaization of occupied Jerusalem as these have the potential to scuttle the
peace process. Unlike Trump, his predecessors at least dared to come out openly
against these Israeli measures. President Trump has also not mentioned the
principle of the two-state solution on which the peace process was established
between Palestinians and Israelis. His visions and solutions as well as his old
and new statements on Palestine have showed no evidence that he is an honest
broker, and, therefore, he must prove his neutrality and credibility so as to be
acceptable by Palestinians and Arabs. Let us examine the recent developments
pertaining to Jerusalem and al-Aqsa Mosque and the actions taken by Israel
against the Palestinians, including preventing them from performing prayers at
al-Aqsa Mosque. The heroic resistance by Palestinian residents of Jerusalem
against these unjust practices has played a major role in forcing Israel to
retreat from its evil plan for Jerusalem and al-Aqsa Mosque. It was the first
time that Israel suffered defeat as a result of the willpower of the Palestinian
people and their determination not to allow Israel to control al-Aqsa Mosque and
erect obstacles for worshipers by installing electronic gates and beam lights.
The retreat of Israel against the steadfastness and sacrifices of the
Jerusalemites does not mean that Israel is halting its hellish plans aimed at
total Judaization of Jerusalem after enacting arbitrary laws and unjust
practices against the indigenous population, such as demolition of houses and
the expulsion of the population under false pretexts. These practices are in
defiance of all laws and resolutions of the UN Security Council and UNESCO that
affirm that Israel has no right to the holy city of Jerusalem and that it has
been an occupied city ever since the aggression of Israel in 1967.
Just and acceptable solution
President Trump as well as his administration and envoys can do a lot to help
resolve the Mideast issue. But that should not be done simply by putting
pressure on the Palestinians and accusing them of terrorism and cutting off aid
to them. Instead, it should involve seeking just and acceptable solutions and
restoring at least some of the usurped rights of the Palestinian people. There
have been many initiatives made to resolve the Arab–Israeli conflict, the latest
of which was the Arab Peace Initiative, which was originally a Saudi initiative
submitted by the late King Abdullah and adopted by the Arab Summit held in
Beirut in 2002, after which it was known as the Arab Peace Initiative.This
initiative is based on the vision of establishing an independent Palestinian
state on internationally recognized borders based on the 1967 borders as well as
a just solution to the problem of Palestinian refugees in accordance with
international resolutions. In return, Arab states would recognize Israel and
establish diplomatic relations with the Jewish state. However, the Israeli
right-wing extremist government has rejected this. The Jewish government has
also rejected the peace initiatives and solutions that it accepted when they
were framed under the aegis of the United States.If President Trump adopts the
Arab Peace Initiative and exercises his influence on Israel to accept it,
perhaps it would be a landmark step in the realization of his attempt to find a
major solution and thus would place him in a respectable position in the annals
of history.