English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For June 03/2020
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews19/english.june03.20.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006

Bible Quotations For today
Let anyone who is thirsty come to me, and let the one who believes in me drink. As the scripture has said, “Out of the believer’s heart shall flow rivers of living water
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 07/37-39:”On the last day of the festival, the great day, while Jesus was standing there, he cried out, ‘Let anyone who is thirsty come to me, and let the one who believes in me drink. As the scripture has said, “Out of the believer’s heart shall flow rivers of living water.” ’Now he said this about the Spirit, which believers in him were to receive; for as yet there was no Spirit, because Jesus was not yet glorified.”

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on June 02-03/2020
Nine New Coronavirus Cases in Lebanon
Hasan Expects 2-Week Extension of 'General Mobilization'
Aoun chairs meeting on organ donation draft decree, meets MPs Traboulsi and Rahme
Cabinet meets in session, reviews measures by Energy Ministry in coordination with Ministries of Information and Environment to open dialogue on Bisri Dam
Diab meets gas station owners' delegation, Customs' successful candidates
Diab meets UN’s Kubis
Confusion Threatens International Trust In Lebanon's Government
Govt. Approves Contributions to Private Free Schools, Wheat Farmers
Israeli forces, armed Lebanese troops square off in rare border confrontation/Incident occurs after IDF tanks and troops cross security fence, while remaining on Israeli side of Blue Line; UN peacekeepers arrive on scene
Lebanese Troops Take Combat Positions in Border Standoff with Israelis
Interior Minister Mohammed Fahmi on Tuesday warned anti-government protesters Strong Lebanon' bloc calls to speed up talks with IMF, finalize appointments
Mustaqbal Takes Swipe at Diab and 'Ruling Party' over Cabinet Powers
Fourth Stage of Repatriations Begins June 11
Hariri: Al-Akhbar Seeks to Sabotage Lebanon's Dialogue with IMF
Lebanese Plunges to Death in Belarus
MP from Lebanese Speaker Berri's Bloc Accuses Aoun of Violating Constitution
Syrian infiltrator injured by IDF fire returned to Lebanon
Japan seeks Lebanese cooperation in Carlos Ghosn case
Sheikh Akl meets US ambassador, receives phone call from Sleiman Tenenti to NNA: UNIFIL facilitated crossing to Lebanon of Syrian who received treatment in Israeli hospital
Hariri’s press office issues rebuttal against “Al-Akhbar”
Hoballah meets Sfeir over agreement with ABL to support industrial sector
Dr. Ghazi Zaatari receives prestigious World No Tobacco Day 2020 Award
The Sad Truth about the 'Resistance' is Exposed When it is Most Needed/Eyad Abu Shakra/Asharq Al Awsat/June 02/2020
Japan denies pressuring IMF to extradite Carlos Ghosn/Jacob Boswall, Al Arabiya/ EnglishTuesday 02 June 2020
"55 slightly sinister stories” by Racha Mourtada/Racha Mourtada/Annahar/June 02/2020

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on June 02-03/2020
US court: Iran, Syria, Hamas, IJ can be liable for 'lone wolf' attackers
Plane Carrying Iran Scientist Jailed in US Has Taken off, Zarif Says
Iran Bemoans Ill-Discipline as Coronavirus Cases Swell Again
UN Welcomes Libyan Warring Parties' Agreement to Restart Talks
Syrian Stock Market Halts Trading for Makhlouf's Company
Syrian tycoon Rami Makhlouf says ‘coming days decisive’ amid ongoing spat with regime
Airstrike in Eastern Syria Kills Five Iran-backed Fighters
Russia Looks to Expand Cultural Presence in Syria
Syria: Pro-Iranian Militias Launch Campaign Against 'Tiger Forces'
Norway urges Israel not to annex parts of the occupied West Bank
Netanyahu Files Police Complaint over Death Threats
Jordan Says Foiled Suicide Attacks against Israel
Turkey Continues Flights to Libya's Tripoli, Misrata
Baghdad, Erbil to Discuss Salaries Issue of Kurdistan Region Employees
U.N. Rights Chief Says U.S. Protests Expose Inequalities, Discrimination
New York Night-Time Curfew Extended to June 7 after Looting
Violence Spreads in U.S. as Trump Faces Anger for Ordering Force
Spain Records No Virus Deaths for Second Day Running

Titles For The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
 on June 02-03/2020
Minneapolis, the Anatomy of Civil Unrest/Charles Elias Chartouni/June 02/2020
Prophecy is Action/Charles Elias Chartouni/June 02/2020
The European Union Is on the Brink of Historic Change/Ferdinando Giugliano/Bloomberg/Asharq Al Awsat/June 02/2020
Coronavirus Hasn’t Killed the Global Balance of Power/Hal Brands//Asharq Al Awsat/June 02/2020
EU: Trade with China Trumps Freedom for Hong Kong/Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/June 02/2020
Turkey: Where Criticizing Islam Can Land You in Prison/Uzay Bulut/Gatestone Institute/June 02/2020
Turkey, Russia may repeat Syrian scenario in Libya/Osama Al-Sharif/Arab News/June 02/2020
Germany’s Angela Merkel spearheading new push for European integration/Harold James/Arab News/June 02/2020
China-US rivalry needs defusing to revive global economy/Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg/Arab News/June 02/2020

The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on June 02-03/2020
Nine New Coronavirus Cases in Lebanon
Naharnet/June 02/2020
Lebanon on Tuesday confirmed nine more COVID-19 coronavirus cases, which raises the country's overall tally to 1,242, the Health Ministry said.
It said seven of those infected are repatriated expats and the other two are residents. The northern area of al-Beddawi recorded two of the cases as the areas of Shiyyah, Haret Hreik, Nahr al-Bared, Majdal Anjar, Nabatiyeh, Ain Boswar and Shaqra recorded one each.The death till still stands at 27 while the recoveries now number 719.

Hasan Expects 2-Week Extension of 'General Mobilization'
Naharnet/June 02/2020
Health Minister Hamad Hasan on Tuesday said he expects the government to extend the so-called state of general mobilization in the face of the coronavirus pandemic for another two weeks. “I expect the state of general mobilization to be extended by two additional weeks, seeing as the World Health Organization recommends continued precautions,” Hasan said in remarks to the National News Agency. He added that the Ministry will carry on with its testing campaign across the country as part of its plan to “contain the pandemic and prevent its spread.”Hasan also lauded the drop in the numbers of infections among residents over the past days. Interior Minister Mohammed Fahmi meanwhile announced after a Cabinet session that the odd-even rule for vehicles will continue in the coming days. The government had imposed the state of general mobilization on March 15. The measures include a nighttime curfew, the rationing of the movement of vehicles and the banning of gatherings. The government has largely relaxed lockdown measures in recent days, allowing most businesses and institutions to reopen while observing precaution measures.

Aoun chairs meeting on organ donation draft decree, meets MPs Traboulsi and Rahme
NNA/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, will chair a meeting, attended by Prime Minister, Hassan Diab, and Foreign Affairs Minister, Nassif Hitti, including Ambassadors of the five permanent members of the Security Council and the representative of the UN Secretary-General, Jan Kubis, tomorrow, to discuss the extension of the International Forces operating in South Lebanon.
President Aoun will inform the Ambassadors about the Lebanese position concerning UNIFIL extension, as the date for deliberating this issue in New York is near.
MP Edgar Traboulsi:
President Aoun received MP, Edgar Traboulsi, today at the Presidential Palace, and discussed with him political and educational affairs.
After the meeting, Traboulsi said that he briefed the President on his continuous follow-up on the course of the academic year and his interest in the conditions of parents, in addition to teacher rights and preserving private and public schools for the upcoming academic year.
Traboulsi also suggested that the state contributes to preserving the private education sector, as done with the health sector, by paying grants for ministries and allocating two million Lebanese Pounds to each student in the private sector through the educational card, which was proposed by him and MP Assaad Dergham. Then, Traboulsi put the President in the atmosphere of his proposal to amend the Higher Education Law 285/2014 to allow distance education according to the highest international standards, thus moving Lebanon to ride the procession of academic digital progress, which were absent for more than two decades ago. MP Traboulsi also indicated that he had asked President Aoun that the advancement of the sectors of education, vocational and technical education and agriculture to be the most prominent issue in the economic recovery plan.
Finally, Traboulsi reviewed the progress of his law proposal to introduce courses of vocational education in the academic track so that the general trend in to enter vocational schools which alone qualify young people to enter labor markets and improve their economic and social conditions.
The meeting also tackled political, economic and social conditions, as well as the file of the displaced and people rights in villages of Hailan, and Miye Wmiyye.
MP Emile Rahme:
President Aoun received former MP, Emile Rahme, and discussed with him recent developments.
Rahme indicated that current circumstances require careful monitoring by officials, especially that economic and financial conditions have the priority. “But it is not permissible for officials to forget to pay attention to social conditions and the needs of people in light of the current financial hardship, and the need to intensify the work of agencies that prevent sharp price rising, in the absence of monitoring” Rahme stated. In addition, Rahme considered that “Dealing with the political issue must be accompanied by keenness on the importance of Lebanese unity in position towards external threats and regional changes, so that Lebanon does not pay the price of any changes that the region witnesses”.
Meeting for Organ Donation & Transplantation:
The President chaired a meeting, including Former Minister, Salim Jreisatti, the Head of Shura State Council, Judge Fadi Elias, and Counselors: Dr. Walid Khoury, and Brigadier, Paul Matar. The meeting was devoted to discuss the draft decree related to organ and tissue donation and transplantation, in addition to the criteria adopted in the decree. Congratulations to the Italian President:
President Aoun sent a telegram to Italian President, Sergio Mattarella, congratulating him on the occasion of the Italian National Day.
President Aoun noted the strong relations which bring the two countries together, and the existing cooperation in multiple fields.--Presidency Press Office

Cabinet meets in session, reviews measures by Energy Ministry in coordination with Ministries of Information and Environment to open dialogue on Bisri Dam
NNA/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
The Council of Ministers took stock at economic measures that could contribute to reducing the food and consumer goods’ prices, at its session headed by HE Prime Minister Hassan Diab.
The Cabinet reviewed the measures taken by the Ministry of Energy in coordination with the Ministries of Information and Environment to open a dialogue with the civil society and relevant stakeholders regarding Bisri Dam.
The Minister of Information also informed the Council of Ministers about launching panel discussions with media representatives in order to look into the Lebanese media conditions, future and empowerment.
PM Diab started the session with a reference to the difficult social and living conditions, which give some of the government's opponents an opportunity to target the cabinet and incite demonstrations by pushing their supporters to go back to blocking roads, organizingmovements aimed at provoking clashes between people and the security forces, and exploiting every drop of blood to increase incitement against the government.
Diab pointed out to the Ministry of Economy’s list ofbasic foodstuffs, for which credit lines were opened for purchase from abroad, and which includes around 30 types of commodities, with encouraging indicators of a swift decrease in food commodities prices. Prime Minister Diab called for the intensification ofinspection patrols by the Ministry of Economy, with the support of the Internal Security Forces in order to control price fluctuations.
Diab has stressed that this issue should stay on top of our daily agenda. All ministries must contribute to this issue with inputs or field assistance.
The Prime Minister indicated that currency traders will resume operations tomorrow, Wednesday, after ending their strike, according to a series of measures and actions that will contribute to reducing the US dollarexchange rate. He expected these measures to yieldquick results within days if they were adhered to.
He also informed the cabinet that the second round of social assistance payments to citizens will be launched within days, and that this assistance will continue to be monthly disbursed until the end of the current year.
As for the Coronavirus epidemic, PM Diab explained that we are still at a critical stage, but we can no longer continue the lockdown; there are institutions that began to shutter; employees and workers have begun to lose their jobs.
Diab called for strict measures to be taken, and there should be awareness among people and commitment to measures and health protection. This is the safest way to strike a balance between people's health and their jobs.
The Prime Minister indicated that, upon his request, the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers has senttoday a request to the ministries to prepare draft ordersfor the promotion of employees from the third category to the second category, based on the Civil Service Board’s approval.--PM Press Office

Diab meets gas station owners' delegation, Customs' successful candidates
NNA/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Prime Minister Hassan Diab met, this afternoon at the Grand Serail, with a delegation of the Gas Station Owners Syndicate headed by President Sami Brax.
PM Diab has also chaired a second meeting in the afternoon with the Syndicate's delegation in the presence of the Ministers of Economy Raoul Nehme, Finance Ghazi Wazni and Energy Raymond Ghajar, in addition to the General Director of the General Security Major General Abbas Ibrahim.
After meeting with Prime Minister Diab, the representative of the Gas Station Owners Syndicate George Brax assured the citizens that there will be no fuel crisis, and that distribution to gas stations from private companies will resume as of tomorrow, Wednesday, to fill the deficit. The meeting touched upon the issue of cross-border smuggling, and the Syndicate's delegation detailed the mechanism for prosecuting smugglers and holding them accountable. The meeting took stock as well on the issue of gas stations subject to seizure reports for hydrocarbons monopoly. The delegation reassured PM Diab that the Syndicate does not cover any station that manipulates prices or dosage. The topic of oil installations was brought up as well during the meeting and the delegation requested the state's support to petroleum facilities, the increase of relevant credit lines and needed quantities, in order to control the fuel market in the country and prevent any monopoly of a cartel or certain companies. The Prime Minister has also received today afternoon a delegation of successful candidates in the customs entry competition who briefed PM Diab about their case. Prime Minister Diab said he understood their demands and promised to take charge of the situation. ----Grand Serail Press Office

Diab meets UN’s Kubis
NNA/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Prime Minister, Dr. Hassan Diab, met this Tuesday with UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon, Jan Kubis, with whom he discussed the general situation in the country as well as UNIFIL’s mandate renewal dossier.--PM Press Office

Confusion Threatens International Trust In Lebanon's Government
Beirut - Mohammed Shukair/Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
A dispute over the implementation of the government’s electricity rehabilitation plan has drawn local and international attention and criticism over the Cabinet’s “inability to respect its decisions.”The government went back on an earlier decision to annex the Salaata power plant project to the second phase of the electricity rehabilitation program. President Michel Aoun had asked the Cabinet Friday to reconsider a decision to postpone the building of a power plant in the village of Salaata on the northern coast. To diffuse tension with Aoun, Diab found an exit to reconsider his government’s decision, despite rejections from the Amal Movement and the Marada Movement’s ministers. The plan is also opposed by other political forces such as the Mustaqbal movement, the Lebanese Forces, and the Progressive Socialist Party. Parties against the plan said that building a third plant in Lebanon requires tens of millions of dollars by the time the country is suffering from a dire economic and financial crisis. A minister, who had voted in favor of the decision before the government retracted it, stressed that Diab has “mismanaged his battle” against the head of the Free Patriotic Movement, MP Gebran Bassil. Speaking on condition of anonymity, the minister told Asharq Al-Awsat that he was not aware of the reasons behind Diab’s decision, which came after his meeting with Aoun, before the Cabinet session that “politically harmed his government on the one hand, and caused him international and Arab embarrassment, on the other.”A deputy also commented on the government’s move, saying: “The government’s performance is dominated by improvisation and confusion… which is hindering key financial, banking and administrative appointments.” This would shake the government’s credibility before the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the deputy noted, especially as bold moves are required to implement the approved reform plans.

Govt. Approves Contributions to Private Free Schools, Wheat Farmers
Naharnet/June 02/2020
Finance Minister Ghazi Wazni signed on Tuesday a draft decision to grant financial contributions for private free schools for the 2015-2016 academic year in various Lebanese governorates, the National News Agency reported on Tuesday.
The value is estimated at LBP 69,098,400,000, said NNA. Wazni also also approved paying compensations to wheat and barley farmers for the 2018-2019 season at a value of LBP 11 billion. Lebanon is battling its worst economic and financial crises in decades that saw many sectors badly stricken, including its educational sector.

Israeli forces, armed Lebanese troops square off in rare border confrontation/Incident occurs after IDF tanks and troops cross security fence, while remaining on Israeli side of Blue Line; UN peacekeepers arrive on scene
The Times Of Israel/June 02/2020
Israeli soldiers and a pair of tanks squared off against armed Lebanese troops on Tuesday while operating along the border between the countries.
The Israeli forces crossed the security fence near Kibbutz Misgav Am, but remained on the Israeli side of the so-called Blue Line, an unofficial but internationally recognized border. The security fence along the border is in many areas located some distance into Israeli territory.
This appeared to be the first time that Israeli tanks crossed the fence since the 2006 Second Lebanon War. According to Channel 12 news, this was meant to serve as a show of control over the Israeli enclave on the other side of the barrier.
The network later aired video showing the tanks moving back toward the fence. In response to the crossing, a number of Lebanese troops armed with rifles and rocket-propelled grenade launchers arrived at the scene, standing several meters from the tanks. Peacekeepers from the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) also came to the area to act as mediators and prevent violence. Lebanon’s official National News Agency said the Lebanese Armed Forces soldiers were mobilized after “Israeli enemy infantry troops, backed by two Merkava tanks… crossed the technical fence” near the Lebanese village of Adaisseh. No shots were fired, and no injuries were reported. In April, Israel Defense Forces troops and Lebanese army soldiers also faced off in the same area, with photos from that irregular incident showing the two sides raising weapons at each other and UN personnel standing in between.
There has been a recent uptick in smuggling and infiltration attempts along the Israeli-Lebanese security fence, which the IDF believes is the result of the Hezbollah terror group either intentionally turning a blind eye to the area, allowing crime to flourish, or losing its control over the border. Earlier Tuesday, the IDF said a Syrian national who was shot after he crossed the border into Israel from Lebanon last month, apparently to perform reconnaissance on behalf of Hezbollah, was sent back to Lebanon. Israel has fought two wars in Lebanon, one in 1982 against Palestinian terrorists and one in 2006 against the Lebanese Hezbollah, as well as numerous operations against terror groups in the country.

Lebanese Troops Take Combat Positions in Border Standoff with Israelis
Naharnet/June 02/2020
Tensions surged Tuesday afternoon in the southern border area of Adaisseh after an Israeli force advanced into an area claimed by Lebanon. “An Israeli Merkava tank advanced into a disputed area without violating the Blue Line, as the Lebanese Army, Lebanese security forces and UNIFIL peacekeepers deployed heavily on the Lebanese side and prevented the Israeli tank from breaching the Blue Line,” MTV reported. “Lebanese Army soldiers took combat positions and an atmosphere of tension engulfed the area,” MTV added.
Al-Manar TV meanwhile said that “three Merkava tanks and a personnel carrier carried out a significant maneuver in the occupied part of the Lebanese town of Adaisseh near the Miskav Am settlement.”“Two tanks crossed the electronic fence and staged provocations by stirring heavy smoke in the face of the Lebanese Army and UNIFIL forces,” al-Manar added. Lebanon's National News Agency meanwhile said an Israeli infantry force crossed the electronic fence through the metallic gate at the al-Mahafer area in Adaisseh's outskirts, assisted by two Merkava tanks. “The infantry force scoured and combed the aforementioned area without breaching the Blue Line, as the Lebanese Army went on alert and brought a number of military vehicles,” NNA said. The agency added that a UNIFIL-affiliated team also arrived on the Israeli side of the border in a bid to diffuse the standoff. “After strong explosions were heard echoing throughout the border towns, it turned out that the enemy was carrying out a military drill along the border,” NNA said.  

Interior Minister Mohammed Fahmi on Tuesday warned anti-government protesters                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
Naharnet/June 02/2020
Interior Minister Mohammed Fahmi on Tuesday warned anti-government protesters against insulting political leaders, the blocking of roads and what he described as “provocation.”“Insults against the President and the Parliament Speaker are unacceptable,” Fahmi said, commenting on the latest protests outside the Baabda palace and the Ain el-Tineh palace. “I'm with peaceful demonstrations, but the blocking of roads is prohibited,” the minister added. “Let them be peaceful during protests and I'll be with them, but provocation is prohibited,” Fahmi went on to say.Commenting on the attacks on protesters' cars in Ain el-Tineh at the hands of members of Parliament Police, the minister said: “These members don't belong to the Interior Ministry and have no authority over them.”

Strong Lebanon' bloc calls to speed up talks with IMF, finalize appointments
NNA/June 02/2020
The "Strong Lebanon" parliamentary bloc on Tuesday called the government to speed up the ongoing negotiations with the International Monetary Fund in order to determine Lebanon's need of funds. The bloc, which convened in a periodic meeting under MP Gebran Bassil's chairmanship, also urged the government to finalize appointments, especially within the central bank and the affiliated institutions. "Time is pressing, and stalling will take a toll on the financial and livelihood condition," the bloc said in a statement. On a different note, the bloc renewed rejection of "lies" regarding the Selaata power plant, reminding that the location was selected in 1978. Furthermore, conferees highlighted the necessity to help private schools amid threats of closure due to the ailing financial situation. Accordingly, the bloc indicated that it had decided to submit a law proposal to support the sector with 300 billion L.L. Moreover, the bloc upped calls upon the government and the Minister of Justice to endorse a decree on the repatriation of "those who fled to occupied Palestine."

Mustaqbal Takes Swipe at Diab and 'Ruling Party' over Cabinet Powers

Naharnet/June 02/2020
Al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc warned Tuesday against what it called “the deliberate political and partisan hegemony over of the powers of the Council of Ministers.”In a statement issued after its weekly meeting, the bloc said there is an attempt to turn Cabinet into “an institution without constitutional competence, whose goal is to implement the agendas of the ruling party and accept its decisions, directives and orders.”“The last session of the Council of Ministers and its statement regarding the electricity plan and the revival of the Salaata plant, in opposition to a previous decision issued by the Council, had a bad impact on the Lebanese public opinion,” Mustaqbal lamented. It added: “The bloc holds the Prime Minister directly responsible for this negligence and warns the political forces concerned with securing the political cover for the government of the dangers of the policies that tend towards overthrowing the Taef Acoord and turning the third presidency (premiership) into an insignificant entity in the political system.”

Fourth Stage of Repatriations Begins June 11
Naharnet/June 02/2020
The fourth stage of a government plan to repatriate Lebanese, kicks off on June 11 and is expected to bring back around 2500 nationals wishing to return home amid the outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus, LBCI TV station reported on Tuesday.
The Middle East Airlines will operate flights for five consecutive days beginning June 11 until June 15. Moreover on Tuesday, Lebanon completed the fifth stage of repatriating nationals through its north border crossings with Syria. Lebanese stranded in the neighboring country were repatriated based on a government plan and in coordination with the ministry of health. The General Security members on el-Abboudieh northern border crossing supervised the process. Medical teams conducted PCR tests on the returnees.

Hariri: Al-Akhbar Seeks to Sabotage Lebanon's Dialogue with IMF

Naharnet/June 02/2020
Former PM Saad Hariri’s media office described as “false” the news published in al-Akhbar newspaper allegedly urging the IMF not to provide assistance for lebanon. “Al-Akhbar daily in its Tuesday edition published an article claiming that figures and advisors close to Hariri have sent messages to the International Monetary Fund inciting it not to help Lebanon,” Hariri’s media office said in a statement. “The Press office confirms that this article is the brainchild of alAkhbar newspaper that considers resorting to the (help) IMF a conspiracy against the economy of Lebanon, while daily inciting to sabotage the ongoing dialogue with it through various lies and allegations,” added the statement.

Lebanese Plunges to Death in Belarus

Naharnet/June 02/2020
A Lebanese man died in Belarus after falling from the balcony of his residence, the National News Agency reported on Tuesday. Abdullah Khodr Lzeiq , 23, from the southern town of Dweir, was scheduled to return to Lebanon next Saturday after completing his university studies in general medicine, NNA said. The agency said that the body of the deceased will be flown into Lebanon later for burial. It was reported that he had an accident and fell over from the balcony of his residence. He was taken to one of the city's hospitals but succumbed to his wounds shortly after, according to MTV station.

MP from Lebanese Speaker Berri's Bloc Accuses Aoun of Violating Constitution
Beirut - Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Lebanese MP Anwar al-Khalil, a member of the Development and Liberation bloc headed by parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, launched an attack on President Michel Aoun, saying that the Constitution and laws were “violated almost continuously” during his tenure and stressing that the government was suffering from internal divisions. While Khalil began his open letter by asserting that it represents his personal opinion, presidential sources and a number of deputies of the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM), which was founded by Aoun, refused to comment on his remarks, while others replied by saying: “We did not read the message.”“This is not the first time that Khalil launches accusations against Aoun,” FPM sources told Asharq Al-Awsat, asking for evidence about constitutional violations. “Berri had previously said that Khalil was expressing his own opinion, which was clearly stated in the deputy’s message,” the sources added.
In his letter, Khalil pointed to “repeated words and deeds showing that the government is not doing well, and the divisions within it from the top of the pyramid to the last minister are clear and explicit.”The deputy spoke of “matters that deeply affect the course of the nation’s unity and the process to stop the continuous deterioration in the relationship between the components of the country and its political parties and the horrific economic and financial fragmentation.” Addressing Aoun, he said: “The Constitution, laws and national partnership have been violated almost continuously since the beginning of your tenure, and the examples are many...”What happened to your economic and social reform? During your auspicious era, economic indicators in Lebanon have fallen to the lowest levels to be only preceded by Venezuela, which occupies the worst and last place.” he remarked. Khalil warned against “the social explosion that has begun to materialize and will expand into boundless limits, because the hungry and rightful will not let you live in peace.”

Syrian infiltrator injured by IDF fire returned to Lebanon
Jerusalem Post/June 02/2020
The suspect had been treated in Israel and was released after an investigation.
A Syrian national working as a shepherd in Lebanon who was shot by IDF soldiers after he infiltrated over the Lebanese border into Israel was transferred to the Red Cross in Lebanon through the Rosh Hanikra border crossing on Tuesday, according to an IDF statement. The suspect had been treated in Israel and was released after an investigation. "The IDF views every attempt to violate Israeli sovereignty severely," said the IDF statement. Recommended by While Lebanese media said that the shepherd, Mohammed Noureddine Abdul Azim, had been shot while in Lebanon as his animals were grazing nearby, the IDF said he crossed some 100 meters into Israel near Mount Dov, also known as Sheeba Farms. According to Channel 12 news, troops from the IDF’s Golani brigade deployed to the area identified Azim crossing the border and fired warning shots in the air to stop him. Instead of returning to Lebanon, Azim began to run and hid between rocks. A soldier then saw him put his hand into his pocket and fearing he was drawing weapon, fired upon him. Just days before the incident on Mount Dov, a senior IDF officer stationed in the area told The Jerusalem Post that many shepherds in the area are known to collect intelligence on troop movement. The officer said that the IDF has identified several locations along the Golan Heights where they know Hezbollah collects intelligence on Israel and warned that “whoever crosses the demilitarized zone into Israel is considered a threat and the IDF will respond accordingly.”
On Friday evening, the Lebanese Army arrested five Sudanese nationals in southern Lebanon as they attempted to cross the border fence into Israeli territory, according to Lebanon's National News Agency (NNA). Also, on Friday, NNA reported that the IDF fired at a shepherd in Jabal Al-Shahl, north of Mount Hermon. The shepherd was not injured in the incident. Three of the Sudanese were arrested near Khalit Wardeh in Aita al-Shaab, north of the Galilee, and another two were arrested in the town of Houla, east of Qiryat Shemona. Avichay Adraee, the IDF Arabic language spokesman, posted a video on Twitter on Monday, pointing out the increase in the number of infiltration attempts along the Israel-Lebanon border and adding that the IDF had intensified its operations along the border in response. "We expect the Lebanese government and the international forces operating in southern Lebanon to impose their control and prevent these attempts," tweeted Adraee.
*Anna Ahronheim contributed to this report.

Japan seeks Lebanese cooperation in Carlos Ghosn case
Arab News/NNA/June 02/2020
Japan’s Deputy Justice Minister Hiroyuki Yoshiie said Monday he hoped Lebanon would cooperate in the case of Carlos Ghosn, the former Nissan boss who fled house arrest in Tokyo for Beirut last year. Ghosn was awaiting trial in Japan, where he faces multiple charges claiming he under-reported millions of dollars in salary as Nissan chairman, when he made his secretive escape at the end of December. He denies all charges. The 65-year-old businessman holds Brazilian, French and Lebanese nationalities. Japan and Lebanon do not have an extradition treaty. Japan has requested Ghosn’s return through Interpol and issued an arrest warrant after his escape. "The Lebanese judiciary is sovereign and only Lebanese citizens and those present on Lebanon’s territory fall under its jurisdiction," President Michel Aoun said during his meeting with Yoshiie. The meeting was also attended by Lebanese Justice Minister Marie-Claude Najem and Japan’s Ambassador to Lebanon Takeshi Okubo. "Lebanon and Japan do not have a judicial cooperation agreement and have not signed an extradition treaty," Aoun told Yoshiie. "Ghosn entered Lebanon through Rafik Hariri International Airport in Beirut legally, with a French passport and a Lebanese identity card. The circumstances of his departure from Japan and his move to Beirut are not yet known and he did not disclose them during the press conference he held in Beirut." Presidential spokesman Rafik Shalala told Arab News that the Japanese minister did not ask for Ghosn’s extradition, but explained his country’s view on the issue and reiterated his country’s desire to further develop relations with Lebanon. "Lebanon is keen to develop the best relations with Japan and is reacting positively in supporting the candidacy of Japanese nationals in international forums and councils," Aoun said during the meeting. He also said that Lebanon had sent correspondence to Japan about the Ghosn case but had yet to receive an official response. The president thanked Japan for the cash grants to international agencies operating in Lebanon and said these were communicated to Lebanon in a letter from the Japanese ambassador in Beirut. Last week Japan’s Justice Minister Masako Mori said the government would send a senior judicial official to request Lebanon’s cooperation in collecting information about Ghosn’s escape. "It is important to get Lebanon to understand the Japanese criminal justice system correctly," Mori added. Ghosn has criticized Japan’s legal system, telling a news conference earlier this year that he had fled "injustice and political persecution" after he was left with no other choice but to protect himself and his family. "The Japanese judicial system should not be based on the idea of revenge," he added.Arab News has learned that the Lebanese judiciary denied Ghosn’s request to remove the security guards from outside his Beirut house because the property is owned by Nissan and is therefore private. ---

Sheikh Akl meets US ambassador, receives phone call from Sleiman
NNA/June 02/2020 
Druze Sheikh Akl, Naim Hassan, on Tuesday met at the House of the Druze Community in Beirut, US Ambassador to Lebanon, Dorothy Shea, accomapnied by the Embassy's Political Attache. Talks reportedly touched on the general situation and most recent developments. On emerging, Ambassador Shea said that this was her first visit to the Druze community House since assuming her new mission in Lebanon. The Ambassador underlined her country's keenness to strengthen relations between the two countries. On the other hand, Sheikh Hassan recieved a phone call from former President Michel Sleiman, wellwishing him on the occasion of the holy Fitr Eid. The phone call was a chance to dwell on an array of national matters.

Tenenti to NNA: UNIFIL facilitated crossing to Lebanon of Syrian who received treatment in Israeli hospital
NNA/June 02/2020 
UNIFIL spokesperson, Andre Tenenti, told the National News Agency on Tuesday that the peacekeeping mission had facilitated the crossing of a Syrian national into Lebanon after receiving medical treatment in an Israeli hospital.
He indicated that the operation was coordinated with the International Red Cross Committee and the Lebanese Armed Forces. On May 17, Israeli enemy troops shot and wounded a shepherd of Syrian nationality in the vicinity of Kfarshouba, before they detained him and transported him into the occupied lands.
According to Tenenti, the shooting is still under investigation by the UNIFIL and the concerned sides.

Hariri’s press office issues rebuttal against “Al-Akhbar”
NNA/June 02/2020 
Former Prime Minister, Saad Hariri’s press office issued on Tuesday a rebuttal against “Al-Akhbar” daily:
“Al-Akhbar” newspaper published today an article claiming that “people and advisers close to Prime Minister Saad Hariri” have sent messages to the International Monetary Fund inciting it not to help Lebanon.
The Press office underlines that this article is the brainchild of “Al-Akhbar” that considers resorting to the IMF a conspiracy against the economy of Lebanon and incites daily to sabotage the ongoing dialogue with IMF through various lies and allegations.”

Hoballah meets Sfeir over agreement with ABL to support industrial sector
NNA/June 02/2020
Industry Minister, Imad Hoballah, on Tuesday met with a delegation from the Association of Banks in Lebanon (ABL) chaired by Salim Sfeir. Both sides mainly discussed an agreement to support the industrial sector. According to this agreement, the ABL will contribute to any initiative aimed at supporting the industrial sector. Minister Hoballah, who read out the agreement between the two parties, thanked the ABL for its cooperation,

Dr. Ghazi Zaatari receives prestigious World No Tobacco Day 2020 Award
NNA/June 02/2020
The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced its 2020 awardees in each of the six WHO regions for their accomplishments in the area of tobacco control. Dr. Ghazi Zaatari, interim dean of the Faculty of Medicine at AUB, professor of pathology and laboratory medicine, has received the prestigious World No Tobacco Day 2020 Award as one of the Eastern Mediterranean Region winners. The award recognizes individuals or institutions based on their outstanding contribution to the advancement of the policies and measures contained in the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and its guidelines, particularly in relation to the theme of World No Tobacco Day. "It is a great honor for the university and for Dr. Zaatari to have him recognized with the 2020 WHO No Tobacco Award. Dr. Zaatari is a distinguished and determined scholar, and an advocate for a tobacco-free tomorrow like few others," said Dr. Fadlo Khuri, president of AUB. "In organizing the working group around the waterpipe, he has collaborated with stellar scholars from across the university, with the shared vision of making this deadly form of inhalational tobacco a thing of the past. Despite the tremendous efforts of our group, the waterpipe remains a major risk factor, increasing in utilization in Lebanese and Arab society. It is great scholar advocates like Dr. Zaatari and his colleagues including Drs. Alan Shihadeh, Najat Saliba, and others at AUB who will help make tomorrow safer for the youth."
Dr. Zaatari is a distinguished pathologist renowned for his investigative work on tobacco control, tobacco product regulation, and health effects of tobacco products, including novel products. He is actively involved with the Geneva-based WHO Tobacco Free Initiative (currently No Tobacco Unit), and its Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg). In 2008, he was appointed by the WHO director general as chair of this study group, a position he continues to hold to date.
He also serves on the Executive Committee of the Tobacco Laboratory Network (TobLabNet), which establishes standard operating procedures and validates testing for chemicals and toxicants in the contents and emissions of a variety of tobacco products. The work of TobReg has culminated in publishing several WHO Technical Reports on Tobacco Product Regulation, manuals such as The Basics of Tobacco Product Regulation and Building Laboratory Testing Capacity, and advisories such as Advisory on Waterpipe Smoking, Advisory on Global Nicotine Reduction Strategy, Advisory on Banning Menthol in Tobacco Products, and Smokeless Tobacco and Public Health: A Global Perspective. The latter was completed in collaboration with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CD), National Cancer Institute (NCI), and WHO. These references are used globally by countries interested in tobacco product regulations based on scientific evidence and data. In 2015, Dr. Zaatari was selected by WHO Convention Secretariat of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) to serve on a seven-member expert team to conduct a global impact assessment of FCTC ten years after its adoption as an international treaty to control worldwide tobacco use. He was instrumental in bringing the FCTC Conference of Parties to make a landmark decision on regulating waterpipe smoking. In 2016 and under his joint initiative with Dr. Vera De Costa E. Silva, the Head of the Convention Secretariat of FCTC, AUB, represented by President Fadlo Khuri, signed a memorandum of understanding to have AUB designated as a global Knowledge Hub (KH) for Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking. At present, Dr. Zaatari serves as its director. Dr. Zaatari has a strong passion for tobacco control and over the years he has participated in several civil society activities and served as an expert and speaker on tobacco control and tobacco product regulations at numerous regional and international meetings and congresses.--AUB

The Sad Truth about the 'Resistance' is Exposed When it is Most Needed
أياد أبو شقرا: الحقيقة المحزنة عن المقاومة قج تعرت وفضحت وخيبت الأمال وانحرت عم علة وجودها وخانت كل شعاراته
Eyad Abu Shakra/Asharq Al Awsat/June 02/2020

http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/86891/eyad-abu-shakra-the-sad-truth-about-the-resistance-is-exposed-when-it-is-most-needed-%d8%a3%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8%af-%d8%a3%d8%a8%d9%88-%d8%b4%d9%82%d8%b1%d8%a7-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ad%d9%82%d9%8a%d9%82/
Lebanon witnessed three significant events the “stars” of which were the current premier, the Secretary general of Hezbollah, and a parliamentary deputy from the president’s political party.
The premier, on the occasion of his cabinet completing 100 days in office, boasted to the Lebanese that it has achieved 97 percent of what it had promised to achieve. This is incredible news, given the political tension, the financial and economic crises, the collapse of Lebanon’s Arab relations, and its failure thus far to meet the conditions of the international community for the badly needed cash. More incredible still, is that the same premier wrote in a major US daily, within hours of his great news, that Lebanon was threatened by hunger!
The second event was the speech given by Hezbollah’s secretary general commemorating Al-Quds Day. His speech was a repeat of his past stances and slogans, which time has proven that they have nothing to do with liberating Jerusalem (Al-Quds), preparing to win back Palestine, protecting Lebanon, saving Syria, or preventing the US from fiddling with Islamic unity. Indeed, it has become clear some time ago that “the Resistance” – meaning the Iranian regime – has lost a lot its credibility in Lebanon. The October uprising’s mass protests in Hezbollah’s southern Lebanon have shown that this is true even in its traditional stronghold.
Before this development, the truth about Hezbollah came out in the Arab world, after it fought in Syria alongside other militias run by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), in order to implement Tehran’s bloody regional strategy. Despite this, the secretary general’s continued to talk about the “victories” of Tehran’s axis, and the Israeli “crises” and America’s “problems”. He even boasted about the “disintegration of their projects”, while totally ignoring the almost daily raids on Iranian positions inside Syria without reply, and the continuation of the Israeli rightwing the policy of annexation of territories, from Jerusalem to the Golan Heights… also without reply!
As regards to Lebanon, Hezbollah – through its secretary general – seems to be satisfied to how its political puppet is running the show. It does not appear unduly bothered about the people’s suffering from the systematic plundering, destruction of institutions, the brain drain, the collapse of local currency, the smuggling of cash and goods through illegal border crossings; not forgetting, of course, the COVID-19 and its repercussions.
Finally, the third significant event, was a TV interview with a lawmaker from President Michel Aoun’s party, the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM). During this interview, the MP broke the taboo of saying that it was no more possible for Hezbollah’s military arsenal and the people’s hunger to coexist! The MP, who represents a South Lebanon constituency with Shiite villages, has thus touched on an issue the pro-Iranian militia regards as its raison d’etre and the indispensable means for building its future “state”. However, the significance of what the MP (one of the parliament’s 128 members) does not stem from his particular influence or political weight, but because it reflects a popular and populist mood that even the Aounists cannot ignore any more. This is not a sign of good will among the Aounists, who until now are indebted to Hezbollah for making him president.
Such a development raises questions as to whether Hezbollah will now automatically nominate Gibran Bassil, Aoun’s son-in-law, the chairman of the FPM, and until recently Iran’s favorite presidential candidate, to succeed his father-in-law. Of course, figures from both sides were quick to play down the significance of the rift, and rushed to reconfirm the steadfastness of the Hezbollah – Aoun “alliance”. Leaders from both sides may well be hesitant about a break up; however, this “alliance” was always a “marriage of convenience” and an opportunistic coalition that brought together extremist Shiites and extremist Christians for the following reasons:
1- The common animosity against the “Taif Accords: Hezbollah wants to undermine the accords because they presented a formula upon which a proper “state” is founded, but which the party does not believe in. As for the Aounists, they opposed the accords because they claim they have weakened the Christians by taking away some executive powers from the Presidency and giving them to the cabinet.
2- The animosity both sides share against “political Sunnism”, which was made easier as Iran’s expansionist project gained momentum and exploited the notion of “the Alliance of Minorities” (i.e. against the Arab Sunni majority). Indeed, the Iranian project was the main beneficiary from bringing down the “Sunni-faced” rule of the Saddam Hussein in the strategically crucial Iraq, and filling the vacuum there with Tehran’s henchmen.
3- The further expansion of Iran’s influence and military presence, the need grew for a Christian “cover”, both locally and globally. Getting rid of ex-Prime Minister Rafik Hariri – a true symbol of “Taif” – was always a major piece of the jigsaw of the expansion map that included Bashar Assad’s Syria. However, the international reactions to Hariri’s assassination led to ending direct Syrian military presence in Lebanon; a presence that for a long time concealed the “organic” relationship between the Syrian and Iranian regimes. Thus, no sooner had the Syrian troops left that Tehran took over the de facto military and security, welcomed the return of Aoun from exile, and entrusted him with undermining the anti-Damascus-Tehran bloc… which he did. Within a short time of Aoun’s return from France, he built his coalition with Hezbollah, which secured him the Presidency and cemented his position by a suitable electoral system, while Aoun provided the Christian cover the pro-Tehran militia needed for fighting in Syria on the side of Assad regime.
The questions that are being asked now are: how long could this “marriage of convenience” last while Lebanon sinks in its acute problems, noting that these problems fueled the October 2019 uprising, made even worse by COVID-2019, and the aftermath of Hezbollah’s drop in revenues as a result of US sanctions against Iran, and sharp drop in oil prices?
Will the Aounists’ Christian “environment” tolerate the acute living conditions, bankruptcy, and hemorrhage of emigration, if the only thing it shares with Hezbollah’s “environment” is the hatred to others?
And, will Hezbollah’s supporters, whose leaders have long convinced them of forgetting the past of the Christian “ally” – including its sympathy with pro-Israel elements, forgive such “betrayal” ...or will it continue – along with Iran – to bet on Bassil?

Japan denies pressuring IMF to extradite Carlos Ghosn
Jacob Boswall, Al Arabiya/ EnglishTuesday 02 June 2020
Japan’s Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi Tuesday denied allegations that Japan is using former Nissan chairman Carlos Ghosn’s extradition as a condition for IMF support to Lebanon. Motegi claimed that Japan would never seek to further destabilize Lebanon’s beleaguered economy, distancing himself from remarks made by Nissan’s representative in Lebanon at the weekend. Late last year, Ghosn fled to Lebanon from Japan, where he is wanted for allegedly committing financial irregularities as Nissan’s chief. Ghosn was able to remain in Lebanon, his home country, because it does not have a formal extradition treaty with Japan. Sakher Hachem, who represents Nissan in Lebanon, recently told Arab News Japan that the Lebanese authorities would have to deport Ghosn to Japan if they wish to receive funding from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
But Motegi denied Hachem’s allegations. “With the influx of Syrian refugees, the economic crisis, and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic facing Lebanon, as well as given the general situation in the Middle East, we must avoid any situation that would make Lebanon more unstable,” Motegi said during a press conference, according to local Lebanese media. A legal source in Lebanon supported Motegi’s claim that Japan has not sought to interfere in the IMF’s potential bail-out to Lebanon. “There is nothing to suggest that Ghosn’s presence in Lebanon would cause the IMF to withhold financial aid from Lebanon,” the source told Arabiya English. “Until now, there has been nothing from the Japanese side about this matter,” he added.

"55 slightly sinister stories” by Racha Mourtada

Racha Mourtada/Annahar/June 02/2020
Today marks the day Andrews McMeel Publishing will be releasing its edition of ‘55 slightly sinister stories’ by Lebanese author Racha Mourtada.
In this issue of Carpe Diem, and with permission from the original publishing house, five of the stories included in Mourtada’s book will be shared with the section’s readers, as a sneak peek into the world this talented Lebanese author has designed within the pages of her writing.
Author’s Note: These stories are the product of a fascination with microfiction, a love of eccentric tales, and a New Year’s resolution to write one 55-wordstory a day (which lasted till May 5; I have a thing for tidy endings). I suggest two or three stories as part of your recommended daily literary intake. Happy reading!
Growing Pains
The spring before turning thirteen, they discovered a hole in the wall between their two schools, big enough for a petite preteen or her gangly crush to squeeze through. Puberty had other plans, though. Over the summer, her chest filled out and his shoulders broadened, making the scramble through impossible. They simply outgrew each other.
He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not (Part I)
He remembers her when it snows. That’s how they met forty years ago, two clueless souls searching for a donut fix in a blizzard. They live in California now, and he keeps looking at her with vacant eyes. She thumbs through the Alaska brochures, contemplating a future where he smiles when she enters a room.
Deadly Detox
She had nightmares of choking on her food while her boyfriend was away, so she switched to a liquid diet for a week. Woozy with hunger, she forgot to wipe up the spill from her overzealous juicer. He found her prostrate body on the kitchen floor, traces of a ginger-carrot concoction on her sticky soles.
Symbiosis
He was her rock—infallible—until he got sick. He started depending on her completely, which she grew to enjoy. But he was getting better now, and soon he wouldn’t need her. She noticed how much her aspirin tablets resembled his medication. She felt guilty prolonging his illness, but at least he would be headache-free.
Lovesick
She passed out at the sight of the beautiful bedouin boy. Who knew love lurked in Sanaa, Yemen, at 7,382 feet? Together, they explored the country. Off the coast of Aden, she felt her passion start to slip away with the tide. She realized, too late, that she might have mistaken altitude sickness for love.
This book is written by Racha Mourtada, illustrated by Lynn Atme, and published by Andrews Mcmeel Publishing
Racha Mourtada is the founder of Luqoom, a boutique publishing house for pretty picture books based in Beirut. She has had a diverse career–working as a biomedical engineer, a UN researcher, and a public policy analyst–throughout which the one constant has been her love of writing. An alumnus of Faber Academy's 'Novel Writing Course' and the inaugural 'Columbia Publishing Course' at Oxford University, she decided to leave her corporate life in Dubai and move back to her native Beirut in the summer of 2017 to set up her publishing house and focus on her writing. Her first book of flash fiction, 55 slightly sinister stories, has been published by Andrews McMeel Universal (out June 2nd, 2020). She has also written a children's book, Swingers, Clingers and Other Amazing Animals in Motion and had one of her short stories, Prelude, published by the online literary journal, Sukoon.
Welcome to Carpe Diem, Annahar's new literary section featuring poetry- old and new, published or hidden within the nooks of unveiled pages of Lebanese writers. We welcome all contributions with the caveat that the section hopes to see rawness and authenticity in thought and emotion. Please send inquiries to Carpe Diem editor kantarjianperla@gmail.com

The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on June 02-03/2020
US court: Iran, Syria, Hamas, IJ can be liable for 'lone wolf' attackers
Jerusalem Post/June 02/2020
The court only decided liability, and could take years to decide actual damages for certain Knife Intifada-era attacks.
A US federal court in Washington has set a new precedent with a default judgment that Iran, Syria, Hamas and Islamic Jihad can be held liable for wrongful death damages for the actions of certain “lone-wolf” attackers. The game-changing decision means that terrorist groups and state sponsors of terrorism could be hit with million- and even billion-dollar judgments for the 2015-2016 “Knife Intifada” and for other lone-wolf attacks going forward, if there is proof connecting them to specific attacks behind the scenes. Many lone-wolf attacks still have no connection to any group and someone who spontaneously grabs a kitchen knife to stab an Israeli soldier would not be included in this decision. A default judgment means that none of the defendants in the case showed up to defend against the charges. Sometimes in such cases, the parties make attempts to frustrate collection of the judgment at a later stage.
Although the decision in the approximately five-year-old case in favor of NGO Shurat Hadin and most of the 44 plaintiffs it represents was formally handed down on Sunday, it was only publicized Tuesday morning. A few plaintiffs’ cases were dismissed. Often in such cases, some plaintiffs are dismissed due to questions about their US citizenship, minor status or foundational questions about the damage alleged. The court only decided liability, and could take some more years to decide actual damages for certain “Knife Intifada”-era attacks, as well as some other attacks between 2008-2018.
Former COGAT official Aryeh Spitzen and anti-terrorism expert Noa Meridor were instrumental in the case by explaining to the court how terrorist groups and state sponsors of terrorism can work behind the scenes to facilitate terrorist attacks, which then may seem to be spontaneous lone-wolf attacks. Their explanation was that Iran and Syria gave training, arms, financial and logistical support to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, who then helped foment and direct a range of the attacks during the 2015-2016 period under the guise of being lone wolves. Shurat Hadin has won judgments against Iran, Syria, Hamas and terrorist groups in the past, but this is the first time that anyone has won a US judgment against such groups for sponsoring lone wolves. More specifically, the court found that Hamas carried out the March 8, 2016, stabbing and murder of plaintiff Taylor Force, the January 27, 2016, stabbing of plaintiff Menachem Mendel Rivkin, the October 13, 2015, bus massacre, which killed plaintiff Richard Lakin, the August 19, 2011, rocket attack on Schuel Brauner, the November 21, 2012, rocket attack emotionally injuring plaintiffs Daniella Parnas, Noa Parnas, Dana Parnas, and A.P. (a plaintiff whose name is under gag order) and the March 6, 2008, shooting and killing of plaintiff Avraham David Moses and injuring plaintiff Naftali Shitrit at the Merkaz HaRav Yeshiva. The court also found that Islamic Jihad carried out the October 28, 2014, shooting of former MK Yehudah Glick, resulting in his severe physical injuries.
Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, Shurat Hadin’s president said, “this is a significant and precedent-setting decision for terrorist victims. The court found that behind each terrorist stands a terrorist organization, so this was not just a spontaneous wave of attacks... but rather a directed and orchestrated move by Hamas.”
She added the key to preventing such waves of violence is to go after the terrorist groups behind the wave.

Plane Carrying Iran Scientist Jailed in US Has Taken off, Zarif Says
Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Tuesday that a plane had taken off from the United States carrying scientist Sirous Asgari after his apparent release from a US prison. "Good news, a plane carrying Dr. Sirous Asgari has taken off from America. Congratulations to his wife and family," he wrote in a post on his Instagram account. In April 2016, the materials science professor was indicted as US federal prosecutors accused him of stealing trade secrets in violation of US sanctions on Iran. A federal judge in Ohio acquitted Asgari in November and US authorities said earlier last month that the 59-year-old Asgari, who tested positive for the novel coronavirus in April, was expected to be deported by the United States once he received medical clearance to leave. Ken Cuccinelli, the acting deputy Homeland Security secretary, earlier told The Associated Press that the DHS had started to try to deport Asgari on Dec. 12 following his acquittal. However, he said, Iran refused to recognize him as legitimately Iranian and provide him with a valid passport until late February. Once Asgari received the passport, DHS made several attempts to fly him back to Iran, purchasing tickets for flights on March 10, March 18, March 23, April 1 and May 1, according to Cuccinelli. Each of those flights was cancelled due to the coronavirus pandemic, he said. Asgari’s supporters told The Guardian newspaper in April he had contracted the coronavirus while imprisoned. He had been held at Louisiana's Winn Correctional Center by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement before his deportation, they said. Iran's deputy education minister, Hossein Salar Amoli, recently said Asgari had recovered from the virus and would be able to travel, IRNA reported. Both Iran and the United States hold a number of each other's nationals and they have recently called for them to be released amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Iran is battling what is the region’s deadliest outbreak of the virus, while the US has reported the highest total number of deaths worldwide from the disease. Iran is holding at least five Americans and the US has 19 Iranians in detention, according to a list compiled by AFP based on official statements and media reports.

Iran Bemoans Ill-Discipline as Coronavirus Cases Swell Again

Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Iran on Tuesday lamented that people were ignoring social distancing rules as it reported more than 3,000 new coronavirus infections in a second cresting wave. "The fact that people have become completely careless regarding this disease" was of great concern, said Health Minister Saeed Namaki, according to AFP. "They either have total confidence in us or think the coronavirus has gone. The latter is not true at all," the ISNA news agency quoted him as saying. His remarks came as health ministry spokesman Kianoush Jahanpour said 3,117 new cases were confirmed in Iran in the past 24 hours. This had brought the overall caseload to 157,562, he added. Infections have been on a rising trajectory in the country since hitting a near two-month low on May 2. They were at their highest on March 30 after hitting 3,186. Jahanpour said the virus had claimed another 64 lives in the past day, raising the overall death toll to 7,942.The latest caseload was close to the highest daily count for the region's deadliest outbreak of COVID-19. The government has largely lifted the restrictions it imposed to stem the outbreak that first emerged in mid-February. Experts both at home and abroad have voiced skepticism about Iran's official figures, saying the real toll could be much higher.

UN Welcomes Libyan Warring Parties' Agreement to Restart Talks
Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
The United Nations' Libya mission said Tuesday the country's warring parties had agreed to restart talks aimed at reaching a lasting ceasefire, after a three-month suspension. In a statement, UNSMIL "welcomed" moves by the Libyan National Army (LNA), commanded by Khalifa Haftar, and Government of National Accord (GNA) to accept "restarting negotiations on a ceasefire and the related security arrangements". A military commission made up of five Haftar delegates and five GNA loyalists held talks in February, but the dialogue was suspended.A January truce brokered by GNA backer Turkey and Russia has been repeatedly violated. Neither side immediately commented on the UN statement. Haftar's rapid advance on Tripoli last year stalled to a bloody stalemate on the edges of the capital. In recent weeks, GNA forces buoyed by Turkish support have taken back a string of coastal towns and a key airbase, The UN mission urged "states backing either of the belligerents to respect what was agreed at the Berlin conference" in late January, where world leaders committed to ending all foreign meddling in Libya and to uphold a much-violated arms embargo. UNSMIL also voiced hopes that the resumption of talks by the joint military commission would be "the start of a truce on the ground and a humanitarian truce to provide the opportunity to reach a final ceasefire deal."

Syrian Stock Market Halts Trading for Makhlouf's Company
Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Syria´s stock market on Tuesday suspended trading for the largest cellular company in the country, owned by a cousin of the president and one of Syria´s richest businessmen. The decision by the Syrian Commission of Financial Markets and Securities marked another development in a deepening financial dispute within the Assad family, which has ruled Syria for five decades. The company, Syriatel, is one of the country's largest employers, with thousands of staff and 11 million subscribers. The commission said its measure aims to protect shareholders and that the suspension would last until further notice. It did not elaborate. The businessman, Rami Makhlouf, a maternal cousin of President Bashar Assad, said in an online posting after the decision late on Monday that the situation was a "farce." He said that over the past 10 years, 70% of the company´s profits were spent on charity. "No one will be able to prevent this money from reaching" those in need, he vowed. Last month, a Syrian court imposed a travel ban on Makhlouf until a dispute over outstanding financial dues is settled. The ban was one in a recent quick succession of government measures against Makhlouf, including confiscating his assets and those of his wife and children, and warning that more financial claims would be made against the man once believed to be at the heart of the economy of Syria. Makhlouf´s latest posting is in line with what has been an unusually widely publicized family rift. He has defiantly challenged the financial claims made against him, saying they are unjust and called for Assad to be an arbiter. Assad has made no public statements about the affair - the most visible split in the tight-knit family since Assad succeeded his father in 2000. A telecommunications regulatory body had said Makhlouf owes the government some $180 million in outstanding operational fees. Makhlouf challenged the claims that Syriatel owed the state any money in statements and videos posted online. Syria, already under Western sanctions, is entering a new phase of economic hardship, its currency in a down spiral that sent prices of basic commodities soaring. Economic activity is also being hurt by restrictions imposed to combat the coronavirus, following austerity measures taken during the war that has displaced nearly half the population.

Syrian tycoon Rami Makhlouf says ‘coming days decisive’ amid ongoing spat with regime
Ismaeel Naar, Al Arabiya English/Tuesday 02 June 2020
Embattled Syrian businessman Rami Makhlouf, who has claimed he is being unfairly targeted by the regime headed by his cousin Bashar al-Assad, described his situation as a “farce” and said that the coming days would be “decisive.”
Makhlouf released a new Facebook post on Sunday in which he revealed new information surrounding his employees at Syriatel – Syria’s largest telecom provider and one of the central pillars of Makhlouf’s sprawling business empire – and that he hoped there would be a "divine intervention that will shake the earth under the feet of the oppressors.”“There is no doubt that there is an invisible hand of supernatural power that allows some people to dare to own property and threaten to take serious measures against our actions if we do not submit to their requests,” Makhlouf wrote. The Syrian tycoon said that two threats were made against his company, the first of which was an amount levied on Syriatel to pay 134,000,000,000,000 Syrian pounds by the Syrian Telecommunications Regulatory Authority. Makhlouf said the company accepted the imposed amount. The second threat imposed on the company, according to Makhlouf, was the authorities raising of the claims imposed on Syriatel to pay 50 percent of the company’s revenues to the government. “This will lead to bankruptcy, which we did not accept,” Makhlouf wrote. The Syrian government says Syriatel, the largest mobile phone network in Syria, owes 134 billion pounds, around $77 million at the current exchange rate on the parallel market. A Syrian court formally placed a temporary travel ban on Makhlouf, whose assets were also seized by the government last month. The moves are the latest in the ongoing feud between Makhlouf and al-Assad, in which Makhlouf has published several videos criticizing the Syrian government.

Airstrike in Eastern Syria Kills Five Iran-backed Fighters
Beirut - Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
An airstrike in eastern Syria near the Iraqi border on Sunday targeted three military vehicles belonging to Iran-backed fighters, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). Five foreign fighters were killed in the strike, for which “Israel was likely responsible,” said SOHR head Rami Abdul Rahman. Israel has reportedly carried out airstrikes in Syria against Iranian targets and its allies, including Lebanese-based Hezbollah. It further pledges to defy the Iranian endeavors to cement its military presence in Syria and dispatch developed arms to Hezbollah. Israel seldom claims responsibility for operations in Syria but deems the Iranian presence that backs Assad’s regime a threat, and it pledges to carry on with its operations in Syria until Iran withdraws from there. Iranian and Iraqi forces – loyal to Syrian regime forces - are deployed especially in Al-Mayadeen to Al-Bukamal. Around two weeks ago in May, unidentified warplanes struck a base in eastern Syria, killing seven Iran-backed militiamen, according to SOAR. Days before the attack, reinforcements were dispatched while Israel didn’t comment on the offensive.

Russia Looks to Expand Cultural Presence in Syria

Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Flipping through the pages of a Russian book at a lobby in the Russian Cultural Center in Damascus, a 19-year-old girl, Nermin, voiced her enthusiasm at the reopening of the center and the resumption of its activities. Nermin is looking to improve her Russian language but is also wishing that the center reboots other activities she has grown to love. “Every summer, my mother used to bring me all the way from west Damascus to the center to learn ballet and music,” Nermin said, noting that with the reopening of the center she will get back some of the joy she lost to war. On May 31, the Russian Cultural Center in Damascus announced the opening of Russian language courses and the gradual return of its activities. For his part, Director of the Russian Cultural Center Nikolai Sukhov explained that the start of Russian language courses is a gradual return to the full activity of the center with precautionary measures being taken to address the coronavirus. He explained that there will be Russian language courses at various levels and for all ages, in addition to courses in music, drawing, and other fields. Announcing its gradual reopening, the Russian Cultural Center will resume its activities after being shut down for some seven years. The reopening of the center is a move to boost the Russian cultural presence in the war-torn country, matching its political and military presence. The deputy head of mission at the Russian Embassy Eldar Qurbanof highlighted the strength and depth of the Russian-Syrian relations and the importance of resuming Russian language courses. Speaking to Al-Watan Online, he expressed his hope that it would be a first step towards developing educational and cultural work that contributes to strengthening relations between the two peoples and fully resuming the work of the center. Qurbanof pointed out that there are 19,000 students currently studying the Russian language in Syria and that work is underway to raise that figure.

Syria: Pro-Iranian Militias Launch Campaign Against 'Tiger Forces'
Damascus, London - Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Pro-Iranian Syrian militias intensified on Monday their campaign against the commander of the elite “Tiger Forces,” Suheil Salman al-Hassan, who is backed by Russia and had attended meetings with President Vladimir Putin at the Hmeimim base in late 2018. The National Defense Forces, a pro-government militia formed by Iran to fight in Syria during the past years, posted Monday on its Facebook page a report entitled, “Tiger Forces Commander… the godfather of stealing.”The page quoted the network “Nahno al-Balad” as saying that “one of the Tiger Forces commanders has turned from a person who barely owns the price of one-bedroom house to a millionaire and one of the most prominent warlords.”The NDF also published another report about Rami al-Tabel, a commander affiliated with the Tiger. It described al-Tabel as a truck driver who became a fuel warhead dealer. The report explained that Fouad Adnan, the head of Tiger’s office is the brother-in-law of al-Tabel. Last summer, the Tiger Forces have been renamed Division 25 Special Mission Forces and placed under the command of the army’s central command. Meanwhile, the Damascus Securities Exchange said Monday that trading in Syriatel shares would be suspended from Tuesday until further notice. The Syrian Telecommunications Ministry had demanded Syriatel to pay $180 million as part of its measures against Rami Makhlouf, a maternal cousin of the Syrian government President, Bashar Assad. Since the decision, disagreements between Makhlouf and Syrian authorities have escalated. Last month, the Ministry of Finance had also announced the seizure of Makhlouf’s assets. The Damascus Securities Exchange froze $15.2 million shares owned by Makhlouf in 12 banks, in addition to a court in Damascus issuing a travel ban against the business tycoon. The decision affected his shares in Lebanon’s Audi Bank, Byblos Bank and Fransabank, the Jordan-based Arab Bank, and others. The Syrian regime has also stripped Makhlouf of his privileges, such as security detail, which protected him and his palace.

Norway urges Israel not to annex parts of the occupied West Bank
Reuters/Tuesday 02 June 2020
Norway, which chairs a group of international donors to the Palestinians, urged Israel on Tuesday not to annex parts of the occupied West Bank. Norway heads the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee (AHLC), which met on Tuesday to discuss Israel’s plan to extend its sovereignty to Jewish settlements and the Jordan Valley in the West Bank, occupied territory that Palestinians seek for a state. “Any unilateral step would be detrimental to the (peace) process, and annexation would be in direct violation and contravention of international law,” Foreign Minister Ine Eriksen Soereide told Reuters after the meeting. For all the latest headlines follow our Google News channel online or via the app. Norway helped to broker the 1993 and 1995 Oslo Accords, which provided for interim and limited Palestinian self-rule in the occupied territories, and initiated a now-moribund long-term peace process. Soereide said she had spoken on Tuesday with her Israeli counterpart, GabiAshkenazi, to urge Israel to resume direct talks with the Palestinians and avoid unilateral moves. “It would undermine the potential for a two-state solution,” she said. The AHLC meeting also urged donors to fulfil their financial commitments to the Palestinian Authority and the United Nations’ Palestinian aid agency to help fight the spread of the new coronavirus. West Bank health authorities reported 388 cases of coronavirus with two deaths as of Monday, while in Gaza, 61 cases and one death were registered. Soereide praised cooperation between Israel and the Palestinians on the issue, as well as between the Palestinians and the United Nations, but cautioned that a lack of testing meant the numbers could be higher.

Netanyahu Files Police Complaint over Death Threats
Tel Aviv- Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has filed a complaint with the police for the third time this year about receiving death threats from Israeli Jews. A senior police commander came to Netanyahu’s residence to take his testimony, and the police said it is investigating three suspects.
In the complaint, Netanyahu indicated that a “lowlife” threatened to murder him and his family. “Today, I regretfully was forced to file another complaint against a lowlife who described how he plans to murder me and my family.” Netanyahu included in his complaint a text from the person in question who commented on an article published by Haaretz newspaper in November. It was not known why the prime minister was so late in filing the complaint. Following the complaint, Haaretz announced that the tweet had been removed from its website. Two weeks ago, Netanyahu filed a complaint against protester Haim Shadmi for inciting violence against him and his son Yair. Shadmi has been protesting in front of the PM’s residence for several months, and Netanyahu said that Shadmi called for an incendiary device to be thrown at the place and made other threats. A Jewish citizen is on trial in Hadera Magistrate’s court for threatening to kill Netanyahu, as well as the Minister of Economy and Labor Party Leader Amir Peretz, and Minister of Labor, Social Affairs, and Social Services Itzik Shmuli. The accused was referred to psychiatric assessment to determine whether he was fit for trial. He wrote on social media outlets that killing Netanyahu is an Israeli national duty, and whoever does it must be crowned as a hero.“Kill Benjamin Netanyahu and God will owe you. I’ll defend you, just please do it already, it’s intolerable. Put an end to this story like its beginning. You won’t be sent to prison for the rest of your life. On the contrary: You’ll be heroes for future generations.”Netanyahu considered the post a leftist threat against him, despite it including two left-wing ministers. He said the left-wing incitement has crossed the red lines. “These are real threats to the life of my son, threats that cannot be ignored.”

Jordan Says Foiled Suicide Attacks against Israel
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 02/2020
Five suspects are on trial in Jordan for allegedly plotting to carry out suicide attacks against Israeli targets in the occupied West Bank, a judicial source told AFP on Tuesday. The Jordanian source said the trial of the suspects, all citizens of the kingdom, had begun recently at the state security court, a military tribunal that usually deals with terrorism-related cases. "The state security court recently began legal proceedings against five people accused of involvement in a terrorist plot, which the intelligence unit foiled in February," the source said. The suspects are accused of "planning to carry out suicide attacks against Israeli targets in the occupied West Bank", the source added. The suspects were arrested in February, according to the source, who did not say why news of their detention was not made public then. There was no immediate comment from Israel. Report of the alleged foiled plot comes amid increased tensions over Israel's plans to annex part of the West Bank, infuriating the Palestinians and eliciting a warning from Jordan it could review ties with the Jewish state. According to the charge sheet, one of the suspects had visited the Israeli-blockaded Gaza Strip in 2007, where he was trained to make explosive vests and bombs. The suspect returned to Jordan in 2010 and seven years later, recruited the four other suspects with whom he plotted to infiltrate the West Bank and carry out attacks "with bombs against buses and trains and with explosive vests against other Israeli targets". Jordan is the only Arab state apart from Egypt to have a formal peace treaty with Israel. Despite the 1994 agreement, relations have been tense in recent years, but security and intelligence cooperation between the two neighbors remain tight.

Turkey Continues Flights to Libya's Tripoli, Misrata
Ankara - Saeed Abdulrazek/Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Italy's itamilradar website has continued to monitor military flights from Turkey to Libya. The latest data showed Turkey sending a military cargo plane, a Lockheed C-130E (63-3188), departing Istanbul and heading towards the Libyan capital, Tripoli.nother Turkish Air Force Lockheed C-130E (71-01468) left Istanbul southbound. The destination of both flights is Misrata, Libya, it said. On Monday, a Turkish Air Force Boeing E-7T (reg. 13-0001 – callsign TURAF18) of 131st Filo, departed from Konya on a surveillance mission between Malta and Libya, said itamilradar.
The website tracked at least 11 flights from Istanbul to Misrata in the last nine days. Turkey has been directly offering military support to the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord against an offensive by the Libyan National Army to capture the capital. Meanwhile, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights revealed on Monday that the Turkish government had sent a new batch of Syrian mercenaries to Libya to fight for the GNA. The latest 400 fighters bring to 11,600 the total number of mercenaries sent by Ankara to Tripoli. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu telephoned on Sunday vice president of the GNA's presidential council, Ahmed Maiteeq, to discuss the latest developments in Libya, confirmed Turkish diplomatic sources without providing further details. Separately, Turkish presidential spokesman Ibrahim Kalin stressed in televised remarks that his country would continue to back the GNA, headed by Fayez al-Sarraj, calling on powers backing the LNA, commanded by Khalifa Haftar, to cease their support. He said Ankara was committed to backing the "legitimate" government until the crisis is over, adding that any project in the Mediterranean region cannot be successful without Turkey.

Baghdad, Erbil to Discuss Salaries Issue of Kurdistan Region Employees
Baghdad - Asharq Al-Awsat/Tuesday, 2 June, 2020
Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and Iraqi federal government continue to negotiate the “pending issues” between Erbil and Baghdad, notably that of “oil in exchange for salaries” that emerged four years ago. The current circumstances in Iraq forced both governments to postpone discussing issues that were described as “fateful” to the Kurds, such as the disputed areas under Article 140 of 2005 and the bill law of oil and gas of 2007. The two governments were supposed to resume discussions on the salaries issue after Eid el-Fitr, however, they have not started yet.
The cabinets also haven’t agreed on names for the vacant ministries in Mustafa Kadhimi’s government, two of which are for the Kurds. They aim to reach a binding agreement regarding Kurdistan’s pledge to pay the dues of 250 thousand barrels of oil exported to Baghdad, in exchange for the latter paying the salaries of the region's employees. However, the Finance Minister, Ali Abdul-Amir Allawi, decided to pay $350 million to KRG creating controversy among parliamentary and political circles in Baghdad. Basra governorate MP Uday Awad called for supporting the demands of al-Basra region which has been marginalized, while the Kurdistan region received unlimited support. Member of the parliamentary integrity committee Yousef al-Kalabi announced in a statement that the government granted Kurdistan the money without any rights. Kalabi, representing the lawmakers who filed the complaint against the Finance Ministry, said that while the country goes through the most difficult health, economic, and political conditions, the government violates the law and grants KRG an amount of $350 million. He called upon the public prosecutor to take action and file a complaint against the Ministry, while obliging the central bank to withhold the funds. In response to the allegations, the Finance Ministry said in a statement that some media outlets published misleading information about the funds, explaining that the amount is allocated for KRG’s expenses, including April’s public salaries.
The Ministry asserted its commitment to laws, indicating that the money was given according to the agreement with the Kurdistan region, which called for intensive meetings between representatives of both governments in June to agree on a final settlement. Meanwhile, KRG’s Finance Ministry denied receiving from Baghdad’s federal government the funds allocated to pay the salaries of the region’s public servants, despite the Prime Minister’s approval. The ministry issued a statement saying that despite the difficult situation and the region's revenues dropping significantly, KRG was able to pay the salaries from oil revenues. Head of the Kurdistan Democratic Party's (KDP) bloc, Vian Sabri, indicated that due to the repercussions resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, drop of oil prices, and lack of 2020 budget law, some illegal and unconstitutional measures were taken. Sabri told Asharq Al-Awsat that KRG’s delegation met in Baghdad with officials of the federal government and finance ministry where it was agreed to send $350 million to the Kurdistan region for April dues. The agreement stipulated that the two governments will enter into intensive negotiations within one month of sending the funds to Kurdistan, she announced, adding that they hope to reach a final settlement.Sabri announced that KRG will visit the federal government next week, noting that it is a positive indication of both cabinets aiming to agree on all unresolved issues according to the constitution and without the employees’ pensions.

U.N. Rights Chief Says U.S. Protests Expose Inequalities, Discrimination
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 02/2020
The U.N. rights chief said Tuesday the coronavirus pandemic's disproportionate impact on ethnic minorities in the U.S. and protests triggered by George Floyd's death had laid bare "endemic inequalities" that must be addressed.
Michelle Bachelet, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, raised the situation in the United States and a range of countries, saying data shows the COVID-19 crisis has had a worse impact on racial and ethnic minorities. "This virus is exposing endemic inequalities that have too long been ignored," she said in a statement. Similar inequalities were also fueling the widespread protests in hundreds of U.S. cities over the police killing in Minneapolis last week of Floyd, an unarmed black man. "In the United States, protests triggered by the killing of George Floyd are highlighting not only police violence against people of color, but also inequalities in health, education, employment and endemic racial discrimination," Bachelet said. She noted the virus death rate for African Americans is reported to be more than double that of other racial groups in the United States. Her statement also highlighted the situation in Britain, where government data for England and Wales shows a death rate for blacks, ethnic Pakistanis and Bangladeshis that is nearly double that of whites. And she pointed to Brazil, where people of color in Sao Paulo are 62 percent more likely to die from the virus than whites, and in France's heavily minority-inhabited Seine Saint-Denis suburb of Paris, which has reported higher excess mortality than other areas.
'Urgent steps needed'
"The appalling impact of COVID-19 on racial and ethnic minorities is much discussed, but what is less clear is how much is being done to address it," Bachelet said. "Urgent steps need to be taken by states, such as prioritizing health monitoring and testing, increasing access to healthcare, and providing targeted information for these communities."She said the disparities likely resulted from a range of factors linked to marginalization, discrimination and access to healthcare, along with economic inequalities, overcrowded housing and environmental risks. "People from racial and ethnic minorities are also found in higher numbers in some jobs that carry increased risk, including in the transport, health and cleaning sectors," the statement said. Bachelet stressed that such factors were likely playing a devastating role in many countries, but lamented that a vast majority of states do not disaggregate data by ethnicity, making it difficult to get to the root of the problem. "Collection, disaggregation and analysis of data by ethnicity or race, as well as gender, are essential to identify and address inequalities and structural discrimination that contribute to poor health outcomes, including for COVID-19. "The fight against this pandemic cannot be won if governments refuse to acknowledge the blatant inequalities that the virus is bringing to the fore," Bachelet warned.

New York Night-Time Curfew Extended to June 7 after Looting
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 02/2020
New York's mayor Bill de Blasio on Tuesday extended a night-time curfew for the city until June 7 following outbreaks of violence and looting during anti-racism protests gripping America. The mayor added that the deployment of National Guard soldiers, seen in other protest-hit states and demanded by President Donald Trump, was not necessary however. De Blasio told reporters that a 8:00 pm to 5:00 am curfew, due to come into force Tuesday, would now run until Sunday. It comes after a curfew on Monday that began at the later time of 11:00 pm failed to deter rioters from looting a number of luxury stores across Manhattan.Broken glass and boarded up shops were seen across Midtown early Tuesday after a night of carnage. The famous Macy's department store, Michael Kors on Fifth Avenue, along with Nike, Lego and electronics shops were among upmarket shops to be looted. Trump, whose New York home is near the stores, took to Twitter twice on Tuesday morning to demand that local leaders "act fast" and call up the National Guard. Several US cities have deployed the guard in the face of angry protests against police brutality following the killing of unarmed black man George Floyd by police during an arrest in Minneapolis last week. But De Blasio said the New York Police Department's 36,000 officers could handle the unrest. "We will take steps immediately to make sure there will be peace and order," said a visibly angry mayor, as he announced the lengthened curfew. De Blasio added it was not "wise" to bring in the National Guard. But New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said the guard stood ready if requested, adding that the NYPD and de Blasio "did not do their job" in failing to stop the looting. He described the violence as "a disgrace" and "inexcusable." New York's curfew will end just as the city prepares to begin reopening its shattered economy on Monday following more than two months of lockdown due to the coronavirus outbreak.

Violence Spreads in U.S. as Trump Faces Anger for Ordering Force
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 02/2020
Violence and looting spread Tuesday to more U.S. cities as President Donald Trump faced heated criticism for using force outside the White House to dispel peaceful demonstrators against racial injustice. Once-in-a-generation protests have brought a multiracial and overwhelmingly peaceful coalition into the streets for the past week but each night has descended into mayhem, with both activists and officials blaming rabble-rousers. Some of New York's most storied shopping streets were ransacked late Monday, including the Macy's flagship, while four police officers were shot in St. Louis, long a hotbed of racial tensions. But there was relative calm in Minneapolis, where the uprising began following the May 25 death of George Floyd, an unarmed African-American man who was pinned down for nearly nine minutes under the knee of a white police officer, who ignored his pleas for his life. In Washington, federal police on Monday abruptly fired rubber bullets and tear gas into a peaceful crowd in Lafayette Park outside the White House, permitting Trump to walk through for a brief photo-op at a historic church that had suffered damage the night before. In scenes reminiscent of the U.S. occupation of Iraq, military helicopters hovered over crowds in downtown Washington, noisily blowing debris as terrified protesters who had defied a curfew fled. Trump, who has rejected the traditional presidential role of unifier during a national crisis, voiced glee on Twitter over the response in Washington and accused the leadership of New York -- led by the rival Democratic Party -- of succumbing to "Lowlife & Scum." "Overwhelming force. Domination," wrote Trump, who a day earlier declared himself "your president of law and order."
U.S. turned into 'battlefield'
But the strong-armed tactics near the White House triggered outrage as the protesters had been peaceful and a citywide curfew had yet to take effect. Joe Biden, Trump's presumptive Democratic rival in November 3 elections, accused Trump of caring only about his own power and said that, if elected, he would tackle the "systemic racism" in the country. "Donald Trump has turned this country into a battlefield driven by old resentments and fresh fears," Biden said in a speech in Philadelphia, also hit by violence. "He thinks division helps him," Biden said. "His narcissism has become more important than the nation's well-being." Trump on Tuesday visited another prominent religious site, a shrine in honor of pope John Paul II, prompting the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in Washington to say the space was being "egregiously misused and manipulated." The late pontiff "certainly would not condone the use of tear gas and other deterrents to silence, scatter or intimidate (people) for a photo opportunity in front of a place of worship and peace," Archbishop Wilton D. Gregory said.The United States also faced unusual, if polite, criticism from some of its international allies. German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas called the anti-racism protests "understandable and more than legitimate." "I hope that these peaceful protests won't slide further into violence, but even more than that I hope that they will make a difference in the United States," Maas told reporters. Germany, Britain and Australia all voiced concern about the safety of the media after a number of journalists were roughed up by police or occasionally by rioters.
Curfew extended in New York
In New York -- which has seen some of the fieriest of the dozens of protests triggered nationwide -- Mayor Bill de Blasio extended a curfew through Sunday that will start each night at 8 pm. It is the first curfew since World War II in the "City that Never Sleeps" and comes just as the metropolis was emerging from weeks under coronavirus lockdown. The curfew began Monday at 11 pm but New York was already suffering widespread looting, with rioters smashing storefronts on posh Fifth Avenue, pulling electronics from a Best Buy store and breaking into Macy's, the department store known for its iconic Christmas displays.
Protests each day have begun peacefully. In the diverse Bedford-Stuyvesant neighborhood of Brooklyn, at least 1,000 people marched Monday, symbolically kneeling as an act of solidarity. "This is about making leaders listen," said Cav Manning, 54, a black man originally from London who has lived in New York for 25 years. "This isn't just about George Floyd, may he rest in peace. This is about all the black men before, all the black women, all the black children, any people feeling the knee of oppression." Mourners plan a service Thursday in Minneapolis to mourn Floyd, who died after being accused of trying to buy cigarettes with a counterfeit bill. An autopsy Monday called his death a homicide, prompting renewed calls to arrest three fellow officers who assisted Derek Chauvin, facing manslaughter charges over Floyd's death. Violence subsided markedly overnight in Minneapolis, leading authorities to consider reducing the number of National Guard forces on the ground.
- Gunfire in St. Louis -
But violence spread elsewhere with four officers shot overnight in St. Louis near the police headquarters after a night of clashes and looting. None of the injuries were life-threatening. St. Louis Police Chief John Hayden told reporters that protesters were peaceful but that a separate group of 200 later showed up who "obviously had no intention of protesting, doing anything constructive" and threw fireworks and gasoline at officers. Seattle, the scene of 1999 anti-globalization protests that remain emblematic for global anarchists, also saw intense scuffles overnight with crowds throwing rocks, bottles and fireworks at police, who responded with tear-gas. Louisville, Kentucky, was comparatively quiet, a night after police dispersing a crowd shot dead a black restaurant owner -- a rare fatality in nationwide unrest that has targeted property. Louisville is among numerous U.S. cities that had already been seething over the killing of African-Americans. In March, 26-year-old Breonna Taylor was shot dead in her own apartment in Louisville by police who barged in, alleging her home had been used by drug dealers.

Spain Records No Virus Deaths for Second Day Running
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 02/2020
Spain recorded no deaths from the coronavirus for the second day running, the health ministry reported Tuesday, while acknowledging some "discrepancies" in the reported daily figures. The ministry's daily report recorded 34 deaths over the previous week, but none over the previous 24 hours. It was Monday's report on the previous 24 hours that first broke a run of daily reported deaths dating back to March 3. To date, Spain has recorded a total of 27,127 deaths from the virus, making it one of the worst-hit countries in the world.But Fernando Simon, head of the Coordination Center for Health Alerts and Emergencies, also told journalists of the ongoing concern at "day-to-day discrepancies" in the data -- divergences that would be "verified", he said. Since the health ministry introduced a new method of tracking cases, inconsistencies have appeared in the data. But Simon stressed that the priority now was to remain vigilant and to detect new cases as quickly as possible -- which they were managing to do, he added. So far Spain has detected nearly 240,000 cases of the virus. Step by step, it is gradually easing what was one of the world's strictest lockdowns imposed to slow the spread of the virus.

The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on June 02-03/2020
Minneapolis, the Anatomy of Civil Unrest
Charles Elias Chartouni/June 02/2020
شارل الياس الشرتوني: مينيابوليس... تشريح الاضطرابات المدنية

The tragic death of George Floyd is a timely warning on the deepening crises of civility tearing at the seams of a divided national community. The ongoing effects of a rumbling pandemic, its unleashed anxieties and overall deleterious effects are running across the political and social landscapes, and rekindling tensions of all kind: political, racial, ethnic, religious and social. The violence we have witnessed in Minneapolis and throughout the Nation are quite reminiscent of previous troubles caused by police disproportionate use of violence which turned awry and elicited major civil riots ( Los Angeles 1992, Ferguson 2014, Baltimore 2015, New York 2019, Minneapolis, 2020 ), and the rise of a new breed of radical politics structured around systemic cleavages in the US ( Black lives Matter, 2013 ). Whatever legal, political and operational measures have been enacted at both Federal and State levels, they have not come up with the awaited results, and the unabated course of systemic marginality and delinquency, violence, unrestrained security measures, and ideological extremism, continued their erratic digression.
The “ Boogaloo movement “ ( Variants of radical Right Wing libertarians ) and the radical fringes of the Democratic Party and their acolytes on the anarchist hems ( the Antifa ) are forging ahead with their radicalism and fueling extremism all across the political spectrum. The reforms of policing regimes ( community policing, codification of restraining orders, Civic Boards and Committees ... ) have been quite operational addressing security issues, defusing racial, ethnic, religious and social tensions, but still have not been able to eradicate the recurrent pattern of violence. Therefore, we are inevitably left with the structural problems of inter-generational poverty among African-Americans ( 17.7 / 100, 2020 ), the destructive effects of unregulated globalization on middle classes ( ie. WASP and rural America ), by and large, inegalitarian dynamics and skewed power configurations based on transnational financial elitism, and the equivocations elicited by large scale migration, politicized ethnicity and Islamist terrorism which created the congenial terrain for radicalization and conflictive identity politics.The pandemic configuration might be the opportunity to address the manifold challenges spawned by this new era, and deal with the hidden injuries of a monumental transition which has been questioning our intellectual, moral and political certainties in the last three decades.
The actual ideological framing which prevails over the political dynamics is what accounts for the current volatility and its incidence on civility, security and overall political stability. I recall a discussion between two homeless boarding a bus in Northern Miami ( one is white and one is black ) in the aftermath of the OJ. Simpson trial ( the assassination of his wife Nicole Brown, 1995 ), on how skewed was the jury’s verdict which acquitted him. The black guy answering his white partner said plainly, “ it wasn’t about making justice, it was about beating the system ”, since the majority of the jury was black. Justice must be served in the repeated tragedy of George Floyd, but what matters most is how to tackle the overdue polarization that prevails over national politics and keeps us under the spell of its extreme ends. The Nation is definitely in need of an iconic figure and a stature which likens the one of Abraham Lincoln, “ I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true, I am not bound to succeed but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong. “
City officials on Friday were urging calm the day after protests turned violent and a police precinct went up in flames.

Prophecy is Action
Charles Elias Chartouni/June 02/2020
شارل الياس شرتوني/النبوءة عمل

" Sacrifice to God is a broken spirit, a broken contrite heart...,
Deliver me from bloodshed God..., create in me a clean heart and renew within me a resolute spirit ..." ( King David, Psalm, 51/19, 10, 16 )
" Get rid of all bitterness, rage and anger, brawling and slander, along with every form of malice. Be kind and compassionate to one another, forgiving each other, just as in Christ God forgave you. " ( Paul, Letter to the Ephesians 4/ 31-32 )
" These shoes I wear are gospel shoes, Oh! my Lord. " ( He’s the Lily of the Valley, Gospel Song )
The prophetic and pentocastal gesture of the Miami Police Department is an outstanding testimony to the power of the Biblical narrative in the life of the American society, its ethics and the centrality of forgiveness as a healing ministry, and as a major predicate in a process of moral rehabilitation and political reconciliation. The theological predicate of forgiveness is part of the intellectual, ethical and political repertoire of contemporary Western Democracy, and a major tool to address moral, political and social grievances. The American Black Churches, and the Gospel song tradition testify to the paramountcy of spiritual and moral atonement in their theological vision, and the Civil Rights movements they elicited throughout history, " none but the righteous shall see God “ ( Take me to the Water, Gospel Song ).
This powerful imagery should serve as a lever for major reformist undertakings in the domains of security, community service and policing ethics and developmental policies. The residual effects of urban and rural poverty among Afro-American communities, the destructive impact of decontextualized globalization all across, and the rampant delinquency developing at their heels, have come to the foreground of the public agenda. They must elicit joint undertakings, at both Federal and State levels, with the different civic and community actors that have featured throughout history the power of the American Civil society and its elaborate associational life and institutions. This prophetic gesture should impel politicians, Civic and Church leaders to pursue the exemplary legacy set by Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights movement which laid down the ideals and modus operandi that none of the subsequent movements was able to relay or match. Political, Civic and Church leaders and institutional actors have to live up to the challenges and overcome the deadlocks set by ideological extremism, their congery of systemic economic and social dislocations, and defense mechanisms triggered by social anomy, generalized anxiety, prejudice, pent up resentments and existential uncertainties.

The European Union Is on the Brink of Historic Change
Ferdinando Giugliano/Bloomberg/Asharq Al Awsat/June 02/2020
The European Union has a habit of disappointing when trying to design a joint response to an economic crisis. However, Ursula von der Leyen’s speech at the European Parliament on Wednesday about a pandemic recovery fund could well be one for the history books.
The Commission president outlined a 750 billion-euro ($825 billion) rescue program to help the bloc cope with the fallout from Covid-19. EU governments still have to agree to the plan, and some northern member states — especially the Netherlands and Austria — are likely opponents. But if the final deal looks even close to Von der Leyen’s proposal, it will mark a radical transformation of Europe.
The Commission plans to borrow the hefty sum on the financial markets and then distribute it to member states between 2021 and 2024, with those who’ve suffered the most economically getting the bigger share. The fund is the sum of many parts. Some 560 billion euros will pay for a “Recovery and Resilience Facility” that will go directly to governments. There will also be a 31 billion-euro scheme to support solvent companies that need temporary state aid, and 9.4 billion euros to prepare for future health crises.
Italy and Spain will be the biggest beneficiaries, while Germany will receive relatively little. The EU will pay back investors via its own budget over a long period — as much as four decades.
The fund breaks a number of EU taboos. First, it raises significantly the amount the Commission can borrow on the financial markets. These are not “euro bonds” in the classic sense of the word, since individual member states will still have to pay their individual contributions to the EU budget, to be calculated by the relative size of their gross domestic product. The vehicle is also expected to be a “one-off” for the pandemic. However, it will be a very useful blueprint if the euro zone ever chooses to move closer to a much-needed fiscal union.
The second big change is that two-thirds of the money would given away as grants. This is the most controversial part of the plan, and it risks being watered down in the forthcoming negotiations between member states. There will be strings attached too, since governments will have to present reform programs to receive support. The extra spending will need to comply with EU-wide priorities such as technology investments and tackling climate change. But the generous provision of grants is a step change from the European Stability Mechanism, the euro area’s rescue fund, which only offers loans.
The final taboo to be possibly broken is on EU-wide taxation. The Commission has an eye on setting up new revenue streams, which could help to pay back investors, including environmental taxes and levies on multinational companies. This is the vaguest part of the plan, but potentially one of the most profound. It would create the seed of an EU Treasury, which could disburse its money where it sees fit.
Von der Leyen will have a tough time selling all of this to the so-called “frugal four,” which includes Sweden and Denmark as well as Austria and the Netherlands. They prefer loans because they fear some of this money will be misspent.
Countries in Eastern Europe have traditionally benefited from the bulk of the EU’s cohesion fund, but they’ve have had a relatively good pandemic so won’t receive much of this new support. It will be interesting to see which way they lean. The proposal needs unanimous support, which will be hard to secure.
At least the Commission president can rely on France and Germany, the EU’s biggest beasts, who struck the breakthrough deal that paved the way for Von der Leyen’s proposal. Spain, Italy and other southern countries are obviously in favor since they’d get most of the money. For once, the political stars may be aligned. If so, 2020 might be remembered in Europe as more than just the year of the pandemic.

Coronavirus Hasn’t Killed the Global Balance of Power
Hal Brands//Asharq Al Awsat/June 02/2020
Is the global balance of power passe after Covid-19? It’s easy to see why smart observers might think so. The pandemic has rendered some of the world’s largest countries more helpless than some of the smallest. It has shown that some threats cannot be contained without cooperation across geopolitical and ideological lines. And so the coronavirus has tapped into a longstanding American hope that the grim realities of geopolitics might give way to something better.
Alas, such hopes are going to be dashed. The current crisis is not an argument for getting over geopolitics. It’s a reminder that preserving a favorable balance, in which the ambitions of predatory actors are checked by the power of more benign actors, is the only way of getting international cooperation, and international stability, on terms Americans will find appealing.
The argument that the concept of a balance of power is becoming an anachronism runs as follows: Military might can’t save countries from transnational scourges such as pandemics. There are an increasing number of issues — terrorism, disease, climate change — that threaten countries around the world. And given that Covid-19 has disrupted the everyday lives of Americans to a greater degree than any hard security threat since World War II, it makes sense to put the pursuit of international cooperation over the imperatives of geopolitical competition.
“Today and for the century ahead,” writes Richard Haass, the president on the Council on Foreign Relations, “the most significant threats we face are less other states than a range of transnational problems.” In the coming decades, agrees former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, “security depends more on exceeding a threshold of cooperation with allies and adversaries alike than on maintaining a balance of power.” Peter Beinart of the Atlantic argues that the coronavirus pandemic shows “the safety of ordinary Americans is often better protected by intensifying global cooperation than by buttressing national sovereignty.”It may seem like a bold new argument, but it’s actually the echo of an old one. Americans have long been ambivalent about the global balance. They have been skillful, even ruthless, practitioners of power politics; The US has amassed, over its history, more influence than any other country. Yet after every great global trauma of the last 100 years, prominent Americans have hoped that the old ways of statecraft could be left behind.
Amid World War I, President Woodrow Wilson argued that a balance of power that had buckled catastrophically in 1914 must be replaced by a “community of power” on behalf of peace and cooperation. In 1945, President Franklin D. Roosevelt (somewhat disingenuously) hailed the advent of the United Nations as “the end of the system of unilateral action, the exclusive alliances, the spheres of influence, the balances of power, and all the other expedients that have been tried for centuries.”
When the Cold War ended, it was President George H.W. Bush’s turn to promise a “new world order” in which “the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle.” After the Sept. 11 attacks, and again after the 2008-2009 financial crisis, there was hope that shared dangers — whether terrorism or economic collapse — would bring the great powers together rather than driving them apart.
This tendency reflects a certain utopian strain in American thinking. It also recognizes that geopolitical struggle has, in many cases, led to disaster. But in the end it’s unrealistic and even naive: There’s no escaping a balance-of-power world, and trying to do so would produce neither security nor cooperation.
For one thing, the major countries of the world do not all fear the same threats or want more or less the same things. It should be obvious by now that the US and China have fundamentally divergent aspirations and worldviews, which reflect their vastly different national interests and systems of government. The only way to ensure that America’s vision of personal liberty and rule of law prevails is to ensure that the configuration of geopolitical forces favors Washington rather than Beijing’s autocratic model. Put differently, those who decide that competition is irrelevant will soon find themselves at the mercy of those who take competition seriously.
The period after World War I is the classic example. The international system created at Versailles was, at the time of its founding, the most progressive ever designed. It featured creative new mechanisms, such as the League of Nations, for tackling matters of shared concern. Yet the system collapsed within a generation, taking with it hopes for international cooperation as well as basic international security. The reason is because the system was challenged by revisionist powers — Germany, Japan and Italy, primarily — that wanted radical changes in the status quo. Those who had the most to lose from such changes were slow to react.
The lesson is not that we are once again on the brink of global war. Not every crisis is the 1930s all over again. But conflict and rivalry are endemic to international affairs, and we forget that at our peril.
We also do ourselves a disservice when we frame a balance of power as the antithesis of international cooperation. After all, virtually nothing is truly apolitical in world affairs. The institutions through which countries organize for collective action are shaped by geopolitical power dynamics. The World Bank and International Monetary Fund are often considered tools of US policy, not because they always do America’s bidding, but because they are pillars in a global structure that favors Washington. And all things equal, the country or countries that have the better part of the balance of power will be better able to negotiate the terms on which they cooperate with others.
The Covid-19 crisis makes this quite clear. China has used its growing influence to bully institutions such as the World Health Organization and to win the silence or acquiescence of countries that rely on its money and goodwill. The crisis is thus a warning that if the US neglects the balance of power, the contours of international action to address global problems will increasingly be set by others.
That we can even talk seriously about de-emphasizing the balance of power is an ironic testament to just how much the global environment has favored the US The geopolitical dominance Washington and its allies have long enjoyed gives them the luxury of not knowing what it is like to live in a world shaped by someone else’s dominance. Deciding that the balance of power is an anachronism is probably the best way of re-discovering, sooner or later, just how critical it truly is.

EU: Trade with China Trumps Freedom for Hong Kong
Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/June 02/2020
The British government announced that it was considering granting citizenship to the nearly three million residents of Hong Kong. The move infuriated China, which fears a massive brain drain from Hong Kong that would jeopardize the city's role as a global financial and trading hub.
Germany, which takes over the six-month rotating EU presidency on July 1, has announced that it will prioritize relations with China. German Chancellor Angela Merkel is particularly determined to proceed with a major EU-China summit to be held in the German city of Leipzig in September. She is reportedly under intense pressure from German automobile manufacturers, who are concerned about maintaining their access to the Chinese market.
"Europe can and should respond more forcefully than it has so far.... [If Germany cancelled] its looming summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Leipzig in September 2020 unless Beijing withdraws its national security legislation.... That would send a strong signal that it will not be business as usual..." — Noah Barkin, a senior fellow in Berlin at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.
"German Chancellor Merkel does not seem to fully appreciate how continued Communist Party rule endangers peace, security and public health, not just in China, but around the world." — Andreas Fulda, a senior fellow at the University of Nottingham's Asia Research Institute.
"The European Union... has the choice. Should we make a pact with an authoritarian regime or should we work to strengthen a community of free, constitutionally governed market economies with liberal societies? It is remarkable that German politics, with its love of moralizing, seems to throw its values out the window when dealing with China.... If current... policy on China continues, this will lead to a gradual decoupling from America and a step-by-step infiltration and subjugation by China. Economic dependence will only be the first step. Political influence will follow. In the end, it is quite simple. What kind of future do we want for Europe? An alliance with an imperfect democracy or with a perfect dictatorship? It should be an easy decision for us to make. It is about more than just money. It is about our freedom..." — Mathias Döpfner, CEO of Axel Springer, Europe's largest publishing company.
The EU has issued a predictably weak and equivocal declaration on China's growing interference in Hong Kong. Meanwhile, the British government announced that it was considering granting citizenship to the nearly three million residents of Hong Kong. The move infuriated China, which fears a massive brain drain from Hong Kong that would jeopardize the city's role as a global financial and trading hub. Pictured: British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. (Photo by No 10 Downing Street via Getty Images)
The European Union has issued a predictably weak and equivocal declaration on China's growing interference in Hong Kong. European leaders, apparently fearful of retaliation by Beijing, have signaled that economic interests will take priority over the EU's much-trumpeted founding values of human rights, democracy and the rule of law.
Europe's continued appeasement of China indicates that the EU will be a weak link in efforts by Western democracies to confront the leadership in Beijing.
On May 29, the foreign ministers of EU member states met by video conference to discuss a common European response to China's plans to impose a sweeping law that would ban all activities in Hong Kong that are deemed to endanger China's national security.
Pro-democracy activists and lawmakers say the law, aimed at crushing political dissent, would effectively end the autonomy the city enjoys from Beijing under the "One Country, Two Systems" arrangement.
The unilateral move by China violates an international treaty — The Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong — an agreement signed in 1984 by which the United Kingdom, on July 1, 1997, transferred sovereignty of Hong Kong to China in exchange for a promise that the city would enjoy 50 years of limited autonomy under Chinese rule. Under the treaty, China is required to guarantee Hong Kong's autonomy for another 27 years.
On May 28, the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia and Canada issued a joint statement that reprimanded China over its approach to Hong Kong:
"China's decision to impose a new national security law on Hong Kong lies in direct conflict with its international obligations under the principles of the legally-binding, UN-registered Sino-British Joint Declaration. The proposed law would undermine the One Country, Two Systems framework. It also raises the prospect of prosecution in Hong Kong for political crimes and undermines existing commitments to protect the rights of Hong Kong people — including those set out in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights."
The British government also announced that it was considering granting citizenship to the nearly three million residents of Hong Kong. The move infuriated China, which fears a massive brain drain from Hong Kong that would jeopardize the city's role as a global financial and trading hub.
On May 29, U.S. President Donald J. Trump announced sanctions on China:
"China claims it is protecting national security. But the truth is that Hong Kong was secure and prosperous as a free society. Beijing's decision reverses all of that. It extends the reach of China's invasive state security apparatus into what was formerly a bastion of liberty.
"China's latest incursion, along with other recent developments that degraded the territory's freedoms, makes clear that Hong Kong is no longer sufficiently autonomous to warrant the special treatment that we have afforded the territory since the handover.
"China has replaced its promised formula of 'one country, two systems' with 'one country, one system.' Therefore, I am directing my administration to begin the process of eliminating policy exemptions that give Hong Kong different and special treatment. "My announcement today will affect the full range of agreements we have with Hong Kong, from our extradition treaty to our export controls on dual-use technologies and more, with few exceptions.
"We will be revising the State Department's travel advisory for Hong Kong to reflect the increased danger of surveillance and punishment by the Chinese state security apparatus. "We will take action to revoke Hong Kong's preferential treatment as a separate customs and travel territory from the rest of China.
"The United States will also take necessary steps to sanction PRC and Hong Kong officials directly or indirectly involved in eroding Hong Kong's autonomy and — just if you take a look, smothering — absolutely smothering Hong Kong's freedom. Our actions will be strong. Our actions will be meaningful."
Trump also announced restrictions on Chinese nationals coming to study at American universities, and measures to prevent China from stealing technology and intellectual property.
Under U.S. law, Hong Kong enjoys special trade privileges. In November 2019, however, the U.S. Congress overwhelmingly passed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019, which places new conditions on this status. The U.S. Secretary of State is now required to certify, annually, that Hong Kong maintains autonomy from mainland China. If this cannot be certified, the U.S. Congress can revoke Hong Kong's special trade status. This could jeopardize massive amounts of trade between Hong Kong and the United States and dissuade international investments there in the future.
On May 27, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that "no reasonable person can assert today that Hong Kong maintains a high degree of autonomy from China, given facts on the ground." He added:
"After careful study of developments over the reporting period, I certified to Congress today that Hong Kong does not continue to warrant treatment under United States laws in the same manner as U.S. laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1997."
In stark contrast to the measures announced by the United States and the United Kingdom, EU foreign ministers, under heavy pressure from Germany, have decided not to take any action against China. In a statement issued after the May 29 video conference of EU foreign ministers, the EU expressed "grave concern" about China's actions in Hong Kong but added that "EU relations with China are based on mutual respect and trust."
EU Foreign Affairs Commissioner Josep Borrell added that the bloc has no plans for sanctions on either Beijing or Hong Kong:
"We will continue discussing and we will continue to reach out to Beijing. Our reaction has to be commensurate with the steps that have already been taken. We will continue trying to put pressure on the Chinese authorities in order to make them aware that this issue will affect the way we deal with some of the issues of mutual interest. But there is nothing more on the agenda."
When asked why the EU refused to sign the UK-US joint statement, Borrell replied: "We have our own statements. We do not need to join other people's statements." German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas said that the best way to influence China on the Hong Kong dispute was for the EU to maintain "dialogue" with Beijing: "I think the past has shown that it is, above all, important to have a dialogue with China in which the EU very cohesively brings both its issues and principles to the fore, and then we will see where this dialogue leads."
Germany, which takes over the six-month rotating EU presidency on July 1, has announced that it will prioritize relations with China. German Chancellor Angela Merkel is particularly determined to proceed with a major EU-China summit to be held in the German city of Leipzig in September. She is reportedly under intense pressure from German automobile manufacturers, who are concerned about maintaining their access to the Chinese market.
The continued cowardice of European leaders is a reflection not only of Europe's geopolitical weakness and economic overdependence on China, but also of a moral vacuum in which they refuse to stand up for Western values.
In April, European officials caved in to pressure from China and watered down an EU report on Chinese efforts to deflect blame for the coronavirus pandemic. A few weeks later, the EU Ambassador to China, Nicolas Chapuis, allowed the Chinese government to edit an op-ed article signed by him and the 27 Ambassadors of EU member states, to mark the 45th anniversary of diplomatic relations with China.
The EU authorized the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs to remove references to the origins and the spread of the coronavirus from the article, published in China Daily, an English-language daily newspaper owned by the Communist Party of China.
An EU spokesperson said that the EU allowed China to revise the op-ed because Brussels "considered it important to communicate EU policy priorities, notably on climate change and sustainability..." Borrell later pledged that the EU will never again give in to Chinese censorship.
The head of the Bundestag foreign affairs committee, Norbert Röttgen, tweeted that Europe's credibility is on the line over its response to China:
"China aims to repress freedom, democracy & the rule of law in #HongKong. #Europe has to condemn such acts of wrongdoing & stand up for the freedoms of Hong Kong's citizens. It would be disastrous & a huge blow for Europe's credibility, if #China could rely on us keeping silent."
Noah Barkin, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States in Berlin, said that the EU should better use the leverage that it has over China:
"Europe can and should respond more forcefully than it has so far. German Greens co-leader Annalena Baerbock has suggested that the EU—and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the host—cancel its looming summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Leipzig in September 2020 unless Beijing withdraws its national security legislation. "That would send a strong signal that it will not be business as usual as long as China is violating the spirit of 'one country, two systems' in Hong Kong.
"Another step, which is reportedly being considered by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, is to grant Hong Kong residents asylum in Europe. Germany welcomed two Hong Kong pro-democracy activists in 2019, so such a step would not be unprecedented.
"In an environment where the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) faces global outcry over its handling of the new coronavirus, is under acute political and economic pressure from Washington, and needs foreign investors to help revive its suddenly sputtering economy, the EU has more leverage with Beijing than it has had in quite a while. Using it would help counter the narrative—following two embarrassing recent incidents of self-censorship in the face of pressure from Beijing—that Europe is impotent and weak when it comes to China."
Theresa Fallon, Director of the Brussels-based Center for Russia Europe Asia Studies, added:
"The uncomfortable truth is that business elites, European bureaucrats, and many European politicians are out of touch with the public's sentiment on Hong Kong.
"The EU's anemic statement on Hong Kong is not going to keep anyone at Zhongnanhai, the seat of China's leadership, awake at night. EU High Representative Josep Borrell didn't even bother to tweet it. Beijing has taken Brussels's measure and does not fear their statements, which declare that they 'will continue to follow developments closely.'
"There has been a concerning culture of complacency and self-censorship in EU diplomacy with the People's Republic of China which has left the EU neutralized since 2016. If we turn to EU member states, the story is not much better. Merkel embraced trade with China in the hope that it would change China. But the reality is that contact with Beijing has eroded European values.
"Beijing understands that economic issues are paramount. Few European leaders pretend to even care about basic human rights in Hong Kong, and it will be difficult to get unanimity on this issue across Europe due to Beijing's economic statecraft.
"To paraphrase Edmund Burke, all that is needed for Hong Kong's 'one country, two systems' principle to perish is for good people to do nothing."
Andreas Fulda, a senior fellow at the University of Nottingham's Asia Research Institute, launched a petition calling for an end to Germany's appeasement of China. The petition, titled, "Europe can no longer afford Germany's failed China policy of 'change through trade,'" states:
"We need to talk about Germany. Let's start with an inconvenient truth: German governments, both past and present, have consistently prioritized trade with China over other enlightened German national interests, for example democracy and human rights. Such a commercially-driven China engagement, however, is not a value-free proposition.
"Whether it is the incarceration of 1.5 million Uyghurs and Kazakhs in mainland Chinese internment and labor camps, the suppression of Hong Kong's democracy movement, or the cover-up of Covid-19: German Chancellor Merkel does not seem to fully appreciate how continued Communist Party rule endangers peace, security and public health, not just in China, but around the world.
"On Monday, May 25, 2020, Europe's top diplomat Josep Borrell addressed a gathering of German Ambassadors. He told them that the European Union and its member states need to develop a 'more robust strategy' toward China. It is self-evident that the EU will struggle to develop a more assertive European China policy without the backing of Germany.
"But how can German diplomats change tack if Chancellor Merkel is unwilling to give directions? It is understandable that a nation which is guilty of the horrors of the Holocaust is wary of playing an assertive global leadership role. But there is also a real danger of an 'oblivion of power,' where Germany in fact underutilizes existing leverage in global affairs.
"Germany is often praised for facing up to its Nazi past. Never again has long been a guiding principle of an ethical German foreign policy. But how then can the German government remain silent when Uyghurs and Kazakhs are incarcerated, Hong Kongers have their civil and political liberties stripped away and Taiwanese are threatened with military annexation?
"China under General Secretary Xi Jinping is regressing on all fronts: human rights violations are now systemic and endemic, even criticism by Chinese academics are no longer tolerated, and the Chinese Communist Party is increasingly aping Russian disinformation strategies in Europe. Germany must now ask if it will continue to actively support such a regime.
"So far Chancellor Merkel has failed to answer this question. She has been unable to articulate what enlightened German ideational and material national interests look like beyond trade and investment. This is a serious shortcoming which not only undermines German foreign policy towards China but also makes it harder to develop a new European strategy towards China.
"At a time of heightened geopolitical tensions between the United States and Communist Party-led China, Europe can no longer afford Germany's unprincipled and failed China policy of 'change through trade.' In 2020 it is abundantly clear that China didn't liberalize and democratize as a result of German car manufacturers enriching themselves by selling cars to China.
"We need a Europe-wide approach which repositions the EU in light of Xi's increasing totalitarianism. While trade clearly matters, European values need to be defended, too. I ask you to sign this petition to put pressure on the German government. Chancellor Merkel should abandon her failed China policy and join Europe's search for a more principled approach towards China."
Mathias Döpfner, CEO of Axel Springer, Europe's largest publishing company, recently argued that the time has come for Europe to reevaluate its relationship with China: "Economic relations with China might seem harmless to many Europeans today, but they could soon lead to political dependence and ultimately to the end of a free and liberal Europe. The European Union has the choice. But above all Germany, Europe's economic motor, has the choice.
"Should we make a pact with an authoritarian regime or should we work to strengthen a community of free, constitutionally governed market economies with liberal societies? It is remarkable that German politics, with its love of moralizing, seems to throw its values out the window when dealing with China. What is at stake here is nothing less than what kind of society we want to live in and our concept of humanity....
"If current European and, above all, German policy on China continues, this will lead to a gradual decoupling from America and a step-by-step infiltration and subjugation by China. Economic dependence will only be the first step. Political influence will follow.
"In the end, it is quite simple. What kind of future do we want for Europe? An alliance with an imperfect democracy or with a perfect dictatorship? It should be an easy decision for us to make. It is about more than just money. It is about our freedom, about Article 1 of Germany's Basic Law, the greatest legal term that ever existed: human dignity."
*Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute.
© 2020 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Turkey: Where Criticizing Islam Can Land You in Prison
Uzay Bulut/Gatestone Institute/June 02/2020
According to the Koran and the recorded sayings (hadith) and biographies (sira) of Islam's founder, "To leave Islam, to insult Muhammad or Allah, to deny the existence of Allah, to be sarcastic about Allah's name, to deny any verse of the Koran" or to commit other acts of blasphemy are all punishable by death.
More alarming is that these pressures and bans come not only from governments. Many of the people in the countries mentioned above also appear enthusiastically to support strict or even deadly blasphemy and apostasy laws.
According to a 2013 Pew survey, overwhelming percentages of Muslims in many regions -- Southeast Asia (84%), South Asia (78%), the Middle East and North Africa (78%), and Central Asia (62%) -- favor making sharia, or Islamic law, the official law of the land. According to sharia, blasphemy and apostasy are punishable by death.
Critics of Turkey's government and Islam continue being targeting by the country's authorities.
Critics of Turkey's government and Islam continue being targeting by the country's authorities. On May 17, Turkish photographer Fırat Erez, a former supporter of Turkey's ruling Justice and Development (AKP) Party, was arrested in the city of Antalya after saying "Islam is immoral" on his Twitter account.
"This is not hate. It is a decision," he wrote. "Islam is immoral. His Prophet, Allah, his disciples could not protect it. Islam has not overcome the moral barrier. It cannot. You cannot find the truth by bending over five times a day. Plain, clear and painful." Erez was detained by Antalya police for "insulting religious values" and "provoking hatred or hostility in one section of the public against another section".
Twitter has since suspended Erez's account, and those who visit his Twitter feed today only see the following notification: "Twitter suspends accounts which violate the Twitter Rules".
Many people who commented on Erez's Twitter post called on authorities to arrest and punish him. One openly called on the "special operations unit" to torture Erez and "not to leave a single rib in his body that is unbroken, a tooth that is not pulled out, and a nail that is unextracted."
The journalist Hakan Aygün, former chief editor of the left-wing opposition-linked Halk TV, was also recently arrested for allegedly "humiliating religious values." Aygün was accused of "provoking hatred or hostility" by "insulting the Koran", the pro-government newspaper Sabah reported on April 3.
On March 31, Aygün had posted a tweet that criticized Turkey's "national donation campaign" to fight the coronavirus outbreak, announced by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, with wordplay over a verse in the Koran. Many social media users have criticized the government for asking citizens to donate to the campaign when many citizens themselves are financially struggling after the government has mismanaged or irresponsibly wasted much of its budget.
Aygün criticized the donation campaign by referring to the Koran, which uses the term "iman" (religious belief) several times particularly in the expression "O you who believe! [who have faith]". Aygün replaced the word "iman" with "IBAN" [International Bank Account Number] and wrote:
"Iban surah, verse 1:
"O you who have IBAN! We gave you IBAN numbers from separate banks so that you will engage in IBAN. Undoubtedly, in the afterlife, those do IBAN will be separated from those who don't!"
Turkey's official Directorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet), launched a criminal complaint against Aygün.
"The humiliation and attrition of Muslims before society," Diyanet said, "is never acceptable in any legal system."Mustafa Doğan Inal, one of Erdoğan's lawyers, also launched a criminal complaint against Aygün. It said, in part:
"The words of the suspect containing insults and accusations based on false claims that are impossible to be tolerated have reached more than one person, and have led to the insulting, degradation and demoralization of a particular section of the society." Inal also said in the criminal complaint that Aygün's Twitter post "insulted the Koran, the holy book of Muslims, in a country where almost the entire population is Muslim and lives as Muslims.
"Degrading the book and its verses, which is one of the top priorities of the Muslims, by changing the places of letters and words through some word games is an unacceptable, ugly and presumptuous attack. Our book, Koran, clearly makes known the end [fate] of such people."
Indeed, laws criminalizing blasphemy or any criticism of the Islamic religion is deeply rooted in Islamic scriptures. According to the Koran and the recorded sayings (hadith) and biographies (sira) of Islam's founder, "To leave Islam, to insult Muhammad or Allah, to deny the existence of Allah, to be sarcastic about Allah's name, to deny any verse of the Koran" or to commit other acts of blasphemy are all punishable by death.
Such teachings have become embedded in the culture of many Muslim communities. Blasphemy is punishable by death in six countries: Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Brunei, Mauritania and Saudi Arabia.
Turkey does not have a separate law on blasphemy, but critics of Islam can be exposed to physical violence and death. Turan Dursun, an ex-Muslim imam and author who spoke about his atheism and publicly criticized Islam, and professor Bahriye Üçok, who said the use of headscarf was not obligatory in Islam, were both murdered in Turkey in 1990. Certain laws in the criminal code are specifically cited to punish people for offenses related to "disrespecting" or "insulting" Islam. Article 216 of the Turkish criminal code, for instance, outlaws "insulting religious belief": "Any person who openly disrespects the religious belief of group is punished with imprisonment from six months to one year if such act causes potential risk for public peace."
Bans on, or pressure against, any criticism of religion appear to be commonplace across the Muslim world. According to a report by the United States Library of Congress: "Most jurisdictions in the Middle East and North Africa have laws prohibiting insulting Islam or religion generally. Many of them have recently applied such laws, including in Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates, and the West Bank. "In South Asia, the Islamic states of Afghanistan and Pakistan have blasphemy laws that are actively enforced.
"Islamic countries in East Asia and the Pacific, including Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Myanmar, have blasphemy-related laws that are actively enforced."
Apostasy is often charged along with blasphemy. According to a 2016 report by Pew Survey: "Laws restricting apostasy and blasphemy are most common in the Middle East and North Africa, where 18 of the region's 20 countries (90%) criminalize blasphemy and 14 (70%) criminalize apostasy."
More alarming is that these pressures and bans come not only from governments. Many of the people in the countries mentioned above also appear enthusiastically to support strict or even deadly blasphemy and apostasy laws. According to a 2013 Pew survey, overwhelming percentages of Muslims in many regions -- Southeast Asia (84%), South Asia (78%), the Middle East and North Africa (78%), and Central Asia (62%) -- favor making sharia, or Islamic law, the official law of the land. And according to sharia, blasphemy and apostasy are punishable by death.
The "End Blasphemy Laws Campaign", run by the International Coalition Against Blasphemy Laws, has been trying to repeal blasphemy and related laws worldwide. According to its official website:
"While freedom of thought and belief, including religious belief, must be protected, it is equally important to guarantee an environment in which a critical discussion about religion can be held.
"Countries which prosecute 'blasphemy' and 'insult to religion' tend to suffer disproportionately many incidents of intercommunal and mob violence, vigilantism against individuals, and the general silencing and persecution of minorities.
"Criminalizing 'insult to religion in the penal code lends... legitimacy to the social persecution of individuals and groups who are said to 'offend' mainstream religious sensibilities, sometimes with their speech acts or writing, often just through their existence, or based on rumours spread with the intention of whipping up violence."
Hakan Aygün was released on May 6, pending trial. His next hearing will be held on July 14. Fırat Erez, however, is still in jail. The way these two individuals have been targeted appears to be a warning by the government to other potential dissidents who might consider criticizing some aspects of Islam or a government policy. Even if criticizing Islam might be offensive to some Muslims, all ideas, religions and ideologies should be open to criticism so long as one does not incite violence. "If liberty means anything at all," the author George Orwell wrote, "it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." Sadly, however, a philosophy that is for liberty seems a million years away from Erdoğan's government.
In Turkey, where at least 103 journalists and media workers are in prison, Orwell could probably write another book about the government's tyranny against minorities and dissidents.
*Uzay Bulut, a Turkish journalist, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute.
© 2020 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Turkey, Russia may repeat Syrian scenario in Libya
Osama Al-Sharif/Arab News/June 02/2020
The protracted nine-year-old Libyan conflict is quickly turning into another Syria — ironically with the same two main state actors, Russia and Turkey, holding the balance of power and supporting opposite sides. Turkish-supported fighters of the UN-recognized Government of National Accord (GNA) have scored several gains recently against forces fighting under the banner of the Libyan National Army (LNA) led by Field Marshall Khalifa Haftar. The most important victory was the capture of the strategic Al-Watiya airbase on the outskirts of Tripoli more than two weeks ago.
The fall of the airbase signaled a reversal in the fortunes of Haftar, who a year ago launched a military campaign to “liberate” western Libya from the GNA after talks to implement a political deal had collapsed. Before Turkey’s direct intervention in January, the GNA appeared to be on the brink of defeat, as Haftar’s forces had broken through the southern districts of the capital.
Turkey has dispatched thousands of Syrian mercenaries to Libya, as well as drones and armored vehicles — thus violating UN sanctions. On the other hand, Russia has been backing Haftar through military contractors, and last week Moscow sent 14 MiG-29 and Su-24 fighter jets to the LNA’s Jufra airbase in central Libya. This could be crucial in keeping Haftar in the game, as Turkish drones have been instrumental in destroying the LNA’s air defenses. The Libyan quagmire has seen many foreign players taking sides, with Egypt and the UAE supporting Haftar, and Turkey, with the hesitant backing of Tunisia and Algeria, defending the GNA under Prime Minister Fayez Al-Sarraj.
But Haftar may have undermined his own position years after emerging as the uncontested ruler of eastern Libya. In April, he absolved himself of the Skhirat Agreement of 2015 and declared himself sole ruler of Libya — a move that was condemned by key international players as well as members of the Tobruk-based parliament. Instead, Speaker Aguila Saleh proposed an initiative to reach a political solution to the crisis.
With UN mediation failing to implement the Skhirat Agreement and end the deep rift between Tripoli and Benghazi, Turkey and now Russia have used the vacuum to bolster their own positions in the key North African country. The “Syrianization” of the Libyan crisis is not far-fetched. Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Vladimir Putin previously clashed in Syria before reaching a deal to jointly manage that crisis, at least in the north of the country. Now a similar scenario is unfolding in Libya and it underlines the new geopolitical reality, which is marked by the lack of a US strategy and European divisions.
The possibility of Turkish-Russian collaboration in Libya, where both sides create a foothold and jointly benefit from the country’s riches, is cause for concern, especially for Egypt. Turkey has been challenging Greece, Cyprus and Egypt over the Eastern Mediterranean gas fields and Erdogan has been condemned for signing a maritime demarcation accord with Libya. It is clear that Turkey’s objectives in Libya are long term.
The US, which has expressed concern over Russia’s deployment of fighter jets in Libya, appears to be content with Turkey’s role so far. Last week, a statement by the US Embassy in Tripoli said: “The United States is proud to partner with the legitimate, UN-recognized government of Libya.” It also slammed “forces seeking to impose a new political order by military means or terrorism.” Such a position strengthens Turkey’s mission in Libya.
The scenario unfolding in Libya underlines the new geopolitical reality, which is marked by the lack of a US strategy and European divisions.
That leaves the EU, which, as is to be expected, is divided over the Libyan crisis. France, unlike Italy, finds itself in alignment with Russia in backing Haftar, but is unable to embrace a clear policy other than to underline the threat chaos in Libya poses to European interests. The failure of Libyan parties to implement the understandings reached at the Berlin conference in January has, for now, crippled any credible political process. For Washington, backing Ankara is one way of offsetting the rising Russian influence in eastern Libya. On the other hand, Cairo’s qualms about the GNA’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood will not be eased by Erdogan’s increasing presence in the neighboring country.
For now, the possibility of Turkey and Russia clashing directly in Libya seems remote. The more plausible scenario is that the two powers will find a way to impose a cease-fire, backed by almost all regional and international players, by controlling their proxies while seeking to reach an understanding on reviving political efforts. Saleh’s initiative may provide the basis for renewed political efforts if Haftar reaches the conclusion that his ambition of ruling over all of Libya is no longer plausible. It is Russia and Turkey that appear to be in the driving seat now, and each is able to implement its own self-serving agenda.
*Osama Al-Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman. Twitter: @plato010

Germany’s Angela Merkel spearheading new push for European integration
Harold James/Arab News/June 02/2020
Throughout her long chancellorship in Germany, Angela Merkel has repeatedly shown that she is good for a surprise. Now, she’s outdone herself.
In 2010, Merkel bucked expectations by insisting that the International Monetary Fund be included in the effort to rescue Greece. In 2011, she announced a plan to phase out Germany’s nuclear power plants following the Fukushima disaster in Japan. Then, in 2015, she opened Germany’s borders to more than a million Syrian refugees. Now she has agreed to a proposal for a joint €500 billion ($556 billion) recovery fund to help the EU’s hardest-hit national economies through the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) crisis.
Every one of these policy decisions has provoked howls of outrage in Germany, as well as hand-wringing by other Europeans, who are reluctant to allow Germany an outsize leadership role. But, each time, Merkel has insisted that there was no alternative. Still, this latest surprise is by far her boldest. “The nation state on its own has no future,” she declared during a press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron last month.
The prospect of a recovery fund has led many observers to wonder if the EU is finally approaching its “Hamiltonian moment.” In the early years of the American republic, first US Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton argued that the federal government should “assume” the debts incurred by the states during the War of Independence. He won the debate because debt mutualization seemed necessary to resolve the emergency at hand.
But it would be a mistake to think that just any crisis can remove obstacles to deeper integration. When the euro crisis erupted a decade ago, federalists hoped it would lend momentum to the European project. Instead, northern and southern member states became more deeply divided over debt. In the ensuing years, both Russia and China have lured individual EU member states into their orbits, the UK has formally withdrawn from the bloc, and US President Donald Trump has all but abandoned the transatlantic alliance.
Like the debt and refugee crises, these geopolitical developments have all deepened Europe’s north-south and east-west divisions. The key historical conditions that would have allowed for a bold push beyond the nation state were always missing. The question, then, is why should COVID-19 be expected to do what Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump, Brexit, and earlier debt feuds could not? There are two reasons to think that the current crisis is indeed different. For starters, the pandemic is fundamentally a crisis born of globalization, requiring a cooperative global response. Second, comparisons of mortality and infection rates between countries and regions, and the terrifying depth and scale of the pandemic’s economic fallout, have put a premium on competent governance for much of the public. It is no secret why the US, the UK and Brazil have such high case numbers and death tolls. Each has an incompetent, ideological and uncoordinated government.
Unlike Trump or Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, Merkel and Macron are not inclined to deploy the politics of emotion. On the contrary, both pride themselves on being skillful managers who make evidence-based decisions. And the evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that the nation state is indeed ill-equipped for the crisis at hand — the most immediate needs are either highly local or supranational.
The question of “necessary responses” is especially poignant in Germany, which, like Italy, was a creation of 19th-century nationalism. Before Otto von Bismarck (and his Italian equivalent, Count Camillo Benso), what we now call Germany was composed of multiple small states. Each had its own rich sense of local identity, but none was particularly good at meeting the technical and economic challenges posed by a world of growing markets, trade, and new forms of communication and transportation. When these smaller entities unified, the liberal journalist August Ludwig von Rochau observed that it was not out of a “sympathy of souls,” but purely as a “matter of business.”
In other words, the nation state was driven forward as a practical matter. Before the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, there were 3,000 to 4,000 independent territorial units to account for — most subject to only a loose imperial jurisdiction. By the 18th century, that number had been reduced to 300 to 400; and, after 1815, all were members of the German Confederation. By the end of the 19th century, there were just three states with large German-speaking populations: The German Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the Swiss Confederation.
The evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that the nation state is indeed ill-equipped for the crisis at hand.
So the number of states in central Europe fell by a factor of 10 every century or so. This is not to suggest that there will soon be just 0.3 states in Central Europe. Nonetheless, it is clear that old-style nation states are being forced to reconsider where they stand in the world.
In fact, the recent ruling against the European Central Bank (ECB) by Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court represents the final push toward a deeper level of EU integration. Though it nominally imposes a limit on the Bundesbank’s participation in the ECB’s bond-buying programs, its effect will not be to arrest the European project, but rather to force the creation of a legal and political foundation upon which that project can be sustained.
Moreover, no European country’s constitution places a greater emphasis on the idea of Europe than Germany’s. The 1949 Basic Law states that the German people are “inspired by the determination to promote world peace as an equal partner in a united Europe.” Even more to the point, Article 24 of that document explicitly provides for the abdication of sovereign rights for the sake of “a peaceful and permanent order” in Europe.
In the 19th century, nation states were forged from blood and iron. Today, something new is being created out of medicine and economic policy.
Harold James is Professor of History and International Affairs at Princeton University and a senior fellow at the Center for International Governance Innovation. A specialist on German economic history and on globalization, he is a co-author of “The Euro and The Battle of Ideas,” and the author of “The Creation and Destruction of Value: The Globalization Cycle,” “Krupp: A History of the Legendary German Firm,” and “Making the European Monetary Union.” Copyright: Project Syndicate

China-US rivalry needs defusing to revive global economy
Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg/Arab News/June 02/2020
President Donald Trump and China’s President Xi Jinping arrive at a state dinner at the Great Hall of the People, Beijing, November 9, 2017. (Reuters)
China-US tensions have been on the rise over the past few years. Trade wars and the controversy over how China handled the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak have added a sharp tone to the heated rhetoric between Beijing and Washington, and made the saber-rattling more ominous. There is much speculation about what the next steps in the China-US rivalry will look like, with some analysts already warning of an impending military confrontation accompanied by firm alignments to one side or the other.
While a full-fledged war is still far-fetched, these developments could be the warning shots of a new cold war. If that is the case, what should the rest of the world do? How can another devastating cold war be avoided? The EU, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and others are considering their next steps.
We should remember that the US-Soviet Cold War came with tremendous human, economic, security and political costs, and we should try to avoid repeating that history. That war lasted more than 40 years, ending with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, and was devastating: Millions were killed in different proxy wars, in addition to millions more injured or displaced. The US alone lost about 100,000 people, from the military mostly, and the financial cost was estimated at $8 trillion. Important legacies remain today, including the enduring political instability and intractable economic mess in countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Congo, to name just a few.
The US survived the Cold War and became the undisputed leader of a unipolar world — until recently, when its leadership was challenged. In an important address on May 25, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell went as far as saying that “we live in a leaderless world.” He added: “Analysts have long talked about the end of an American-led system and the arrival of an Asian century. This is now happening in front of our eyes.” Borrell’s predictions about the end of American leadership may be disputed, but he is right in saying that Asia is now an increasingly important factor — in economic, security and technological terms.
COVID-19 is probably the first major crisis in decades where the US is not leading the international response, and neither for that matter is Europe. The bright spots are in Asia, such as Japan and South Korea.
China is claiming the mantle of leadership, while the US is preoccupied with the fiercely contested 2020 presidential election, the crippling, rapid spread of COVID-19 and rising racial tensions — issues that have raised questions about the leadership and trust within the US.
But leadership of the world order has its price: While China is gaining ground and getting more powerful and assertive, its quick rise has sparked fears and jealousies. Many are asking questions about its readiness for a leadership role. For example, as the world’s second-largest economy, how much is it willing to provide in assistance to poor countries and international organizations compared to the US, which has been the largest aid donor and funder of international organizations? Some question China’s trade and investment policies in developing countries. Others question China’s adherence to international conventions on human rights. Beijing needs to address these questions and apprehensions.
The China-US rivalry is also having a major effect on the multilateral system. There are now many more divisions and fewer agreements on major issues.
With this rivalry, there is growing direct and indirect pressure on others to choose sides. The biggest prize may be the EU, the largest trading bloc in the world. While in the Cold War most of Europe was solidly in the US camp, now the EU as a group and some of its members are at odds with the Trump administration over important issues, including Iran. But will they side with China?
At last Friday’s EU foreign ministers meeting, China was the main topic. After the meeting, Borrell said those present concluded that China is “a competitor, yes. It is a competitor, a partner, an ally, a rival. Everything at the same time. So it is a complex relationship that cannot be reduced to a single dimension.” Borrell indicated that the EU’s China policy is still evolving, but outlined some of the elements that need to be addressed in terms of interests and values. What is clear is that the EU is trying not to be drawn into the China-US rivalry for global leadership. For example, the EU is not following America’s approach and imposing sanctions on China, but nevertheless it is challenging Beijing on many contentious issues. While China is gaining ground and getting more powerful and assertive, its quick rise has sparked fears and jealousies.
Once completed, the EU’s China policy will have important implications on the new world order and China-US rivalry. Let us hope that the EU will emphasize cooperation instead of rivalry. The GCC is also considering its approach to this growing dilemma. COVID-19 has made it imperative to do so, with its devastating effects on the world economy and disruption of supply chains.
The GCC does not need to choose sides because it is close to both: The US has been a security and strategic ally for decades, as well as an economic and cultural partner. China is the GCC’s top trading partner, with increasing political and security ties. Both sides also need the GCC as a source of energy and a thriving market for their products. As such, the GCC should be working to enhance its partnership with both countries.
Because the China-US rivalry and trade wars have contributed to the global economic slowdown, and hence harmed the economies of the GCC and EU, they need to do more by trying to bridge the growing divide between Beijing and Washington and encouraging a more cooperative approach.
Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg is the Gulf Cooperation Council’s assistant secretary-general for political affairs and negotiation, and a columnist for Arab News. The views expressed in this piece are personal and do not necessarily represent those of the GCC. Twitter: @abuhamad1