LCCC
ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
May 21/2018
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias
Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias18/english.may21.18.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible
Quotations
Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for
this is right. ‘Honour your father and mother’ this is the first commandment
with a promise
Letter to the Ephesians 06/01-09: "Children, obey
your parents in the Lord, for this is right. ‘Honour your father and mother’
this is the first commandment with a promise: ‘so that it may be well with
you and you may live long on the earth.’ And, fathers, do not provoke your
children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of
the Lord. Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, in
singleness of heart, as you obey Christ; not only while being watched, and
in order to please them, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from
the heart. Render service with enthusiasm, as to the Lord and not to men and
women, knowing that whatever good we do, we will receive the same again from
the Lord, whether we are slaves or free. And, masters, do the same to them.
Stop threatening them, for you know that both of you have the same Master in
heaven, and with him there is no partiality."
Titles For
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources
published on May 20-21/18
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres
Demands Lebanese Government to Prohibit 'Hezbollah' from Acquiring Weapons/Asharq
Al Awsat/May 20/18
What’s Next with Iran/David Ignatius/The Washington Post/May 20/18
Russia Sets Out to Sanction Western Sanctions/Leonid Bershidsky/Bloomberg/May
20/18
Abadi and Sadr: The path towards an Iraqi national cabinet/Hassan Al
Mustafa/Al Arabiya/May 20/18
Santa Fe, Texas: Another ‘terrorist’ school shooting/Walid Jawad/Al Arabiya/May
20/18
Secularism: Differences among academics, radicals and Orientalists/Fahad
Suleiman Shoqiran/Al Arabiya/May 20/18
How the Iraq war undermined the Responsibility to Protect doctrine/Kerry
Boyd Anderson/Arab News/May 20/2018
Iran's Leaders at War with Western Civilization/Why is the West Putting Up
with It?/Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/May 20/18
Trump ME peace plan: Half West Bank for Palestinians, Abu Dis as capital/DEBKAfile/May
20, 2018
Titles For Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on
May 20-21/18
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres Demands Lebanese Government to
Prohibit 'Hezbollah' from Acquiring Weapons
Saudi Arabian embassy in Lebanon hosts Iftar in honor of Prime Minister Saad
Hariri
Hariri speaks at Saudi embassy iftar: ‘Lebanon’s Arabism is a red line’
Lebanon’s Nadine Labaki Wins Jury Prize at Cannes Film Festival
Maronite Patriarch Warns of State of Economic Emergency
Berri Sources: Vote Plunged Lebanon into Dangerous Phase
Jumblat Meets Berri, Endorses Ferzli for Deputy Speaker
LF Says Hariri-Geagea Talks 'Turned Page on Disagreement'
Qaouq: Saudi Doesn't Want Hizbullah in New Govt.
Nadine Labaki Dedicates Her Cannes Prize to Poor Kids
Hariri Says 'Entire Lebanon Proud' of Labaki's Cannes Win
Report: Franjieh, Miqati Won’t Join Parliament Blocs
'Phoenician Ship' made of plastic bottles sails from Byblos to Beirut Port
ElKhalil: Internal, regional challenges entail acceleration of national
unity government formation
Bou Assi says transparency and sovereignty are Lebanese Forces objectives
Sanctions on Hezbollah will hinder cabinet formation
Batroun Festivals launch their activities for Summer 2018, Guidanian, Bassil
confirm their international standards
Titles For Latest LCCC
Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on May on May 20-21/18
In first US foreign policy speech,
Pompeo to discuss ‘totality of Iran’s threats’
First ISIS fighters evacuate south Damascus around Yarmouk Camp
Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr meets PM Abadi, hinting at coalition
Europe, China, Russia discussing new deal for Iran
Iraq: Battle for Largest Parliamentary Bloc Heats Up
Iran Relies on Europe for Saving its Oil Exports
Saudi Air Defenses Intercept Houthi Ballistic Missile
4 Rebels Dead in Attack on Church in Chechnya
U.S., French Fire Backs Advance against IS in East Syria.
Syria Rehab Center Seeks to Tame 'Caliphate Cubs'
South Syria Factions Renew Fighting ISIS-affiliated Group
Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on
May 20-21/18
UN Secretary-General
Antonio Guterres Demands Lebanese Government to Prohibit 'Hezbollah' from
Acquiring Weapons
New York - Ali Barda/Asharq Al Awsat/May 20/18
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/64790/un-secretary-general-antonio-guterres-demands-lebanese-government-to-prohibit-hezbollah-from-acquiring-weapons-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%85-%D9%84%D9%84/
United Nations
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres demanded the Lebanese government to take
“all necessary measures to prohibit 'Hezbollah' from continuing to acquire
weapons,” warning from the severe repercussions of the ongoing involvement
of the pro-Iranian party in the Syrian crisis.
Asharq Al-Awsat received on Saturday an advanced version of Guterres’ latest
report on the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1559 related
to the withdrawal of foreign forces from Lebanon and the disarmament of
militias. In his report, the UN Secretary-General cautioned that the
widespread proliferation of weapons outside the control of the State,
combined with the continued existence of heavily armed militias, undermines
the security of Lebanese citizens. Guterres said he was “extremely
concerned” that Hezbollah continues to operate outside the control of the
Lebanese state by possessing weapons outside government control. He said he
was also warned from the repercussions of Hezbollah’s involvement in the
Syrian war, saying that such interference reveals “the failure of Hezbollah
to disarm and its refusal to be responsible in front of Lebanese state
institutions.”
Guterres also expressed his concerns about information reporting the
involvement of Hezbollah and other Lebanese members in fighting spread
across other regional areas, a development which carries the threats of
implicating Lebanon in regional conflicts. Referring to the tours conducted
by leaders from the Iranian-backed Asaib Ahl al-Haq militia and other Iraqi
Shiite militias at the border area between Lebanon and Israel, Guterres
said, “The unauthorized visits of foreign militia members to southern
Lebanon undermines the state authority and contradicts the spirit of the
dissociation policy.”
He demanded Hezbollah and all concerned parties to stop any military
activities inside or outside Lebanon. The UN Secretary-General then called
on the Lebanese government to take all measures necessary to prohibit
Hezbollah and other armed groups from acquiring weapons and building
paramilitary capacity outside the authority of the State.
Saudi Arabian embassy in Lebanon hosts Iftar in honor
of Prime Minister Saad Hariri
Arab News/May 20/2018 /BEIRUT: The Saudi Arabian Charge d’Affaires in
Lebanon, Walid bin Abdullah Bukhari, held a Ramadan Iftar banquet at his
residence in Al-Birzeh on Saturday evening in honor of Lebanese Prime
Minister Saad Hariri in presence of Adviser at the Saudi Royal Court Nizar
Al-Alula. Bukhari delivered a speech welcoming all, praising the
distinguished relations between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Republic
of Lebanon. For his part, the Lebanese Prime Minister also delivered a
speech in which he stressed the depth of relations between the two
countries.
“All the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia wants from Lebanon is to remain united in
facing the challenges and to maintain our Arabism and our commitment to the
Taif Agreement,” he said, adding that “the history of the Kingdom with
Lebanon is good and full of cooperation.”Hariri expressed his thanks and
appreciation to Saudi leaders for their permanent standing alongside
Lebanon, saying: “The Kingdom has always wanted stability, safety,
development and peace for Lebanon.”
Hariri speaks at Saudi embassy iftar: ‘Lebanon’s
Arabism is a red line’
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Sunday, 20 May 2018/The Saudi embassy in
Lebanon on Saturday held an iftar (meal to break the Ramadan fast) banquet
attended by Lebanon’s diplomats, representing a mix of political parties and
all sectarian components in the country. Among the attendees were Lebanese
Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri and Saudi envoy Nizar Al Alula. Saudi Charge
d'Affaires in Lebanon Walid al-Bukhari welcomed the invitees, saying:
"Welcome to the House of Saudi Arabia in Lebanon, home of all the
Lebanese."On the occasion, Hariri said: “This Saudi home brings together all
the Lebanese and does not differentiate between them … What Saudi Arabia
wants from the Lebanese is to remain unified and preserve our Arabism and
our commitment to the Taif agreement." He called on Lebanon to distance
itself from problems in the region and to protect the country’s Arab
identity, in a reference to the Iranian-backed Hezbollah and its creeping
influence in Lebanese politics."Saudi Arabia’s history with Lebanon is full
of greatness and love, and we cooperate with all the honorable people in the
country to honor this history and adhere to the best relations with
brotherly Arab countries. Interference in our internal affairs, and we are
required in return to distance ourselves from interfering in the affairs of
brotherly countries, and to consider the Arabism of Lebanon a red line that
can not be avoided. "He added: "The history of the Kingdom with Lebanon is
full of good and love, and we cooperate with all the honorable people in the
country on our time to honor this history and our adherence to the best
relations with the brotherly Arab countries. Gulf Arab states have stood by
Lebanon in its weakest moments, without interference in our internal
affairs. In return, we are required to distance ourselves [from regional
problems] and to consider the Arabism of Lebanon a red line that cannot be
overstepped."
Lebanon’s Nadine Labaki Wins Jury Prize at
Cannes Film Festival
Asharq Al-Awsat/Saturday, 19 May, 2018/Lebanese director Nadine Labaki won
on Saturday the Jury Prize at the 2018 Cannes film festival for “Capernaum”,
the story of a destitute Beirut boy who takes his parents to court for
bringing him into a miserable existence. She was only the second Arab woman
to have a film in the running for the Palme d'Or, after Lebanon's Heiny
Srour in 1974 (the year of Labaki's birth). The Palme d'Or ultimately went
on Saturday to Hirokazu Kore-eda of Japan for his touching film
"Shoplifters". Labaki’s third feature, which won a 15-minute standing
ovation at its premiere, catapults her into the big league after "Caramel",
her intimate debut about a Beirut beauty parlor, and "Where Do We Go Now?",
about women on a mission to end sectarian violence in their village. This
time the main protagonist is a foul-mouthed 12-year-old street kid. Labaki
told Agence France Presse that in the past she found herself amplifying
women's voices because "it was a subject I was more versed in than men" but
"never really felt pressure to talk about women just because I am a
woman.""There are other things bothering me now," she said, citing the dense
thicket of issues tackled in "Capernaum". "I'm thinking of the notion of
borders, of having to have papers to exist, of being completely excluded
from the system if you don't have them, of the maltreatment of children,
modern slavery, immigrant workers, Syrian immigrants -- all these issues
where people find themselves completely excluded from the system because it
is not capable of finding solutions." Labaki does not spare the rod with her
homeland, at the risk of being accused by the Lebanese of washing their
dirty laundry in public. "Obviously it's a huge risk but we must stop
making excuses, it's a reality that exists and we cannot continue to bury
our heads in the sand," she insisted. For the director who turned to films
for escapism during Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war, "cinema is not only about
making people dream." "It's about changing things and making people think."
Labaki found the idea for the film staring her in the face one night when
she was driving home from a party and saw a child half-asleep in the arms of
his mother begging on the pavement. "It became an obsession for me... I did
more than three years of research. I was trying to understand how the system
fails these kids."This year's festival, which featured five directors from
North Africa and the Middle East, is one of the best in half a century for
Arab cinema. Three of the filmmakers are women but gender equality takes a
back seat to poverty, class and social stagnation in this crop. Labaki is
lukewarm about the campaign for gender quotas in film casts and crews
fronted by Hollywood actresses, including jury president Cate Blanchett, in
the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal. "It's not just because we decide
that there should be parity in a given domain that it is truly merited.
Whether it's a man or a woman it must be truly on merit."The glamorous
director, who was a red-carpet guest of French President Emmanuel Macron at
a dinner in Paris last year, started out making advertisements and music
videos for artists like Lebanese pop icon Nancy Ajram.
Maronite Patriarch Warns of State of Economic Emergency
Kataeb.org/Sunday 20th May 2018/Maronite Patriarch Bechara Al-Rahi warned
that Lebanon is facing a state of economic and financial emergency which
requires an anti-corruption plan, stressing the need to clear all the
hurdles that would delay the formation of a new government. “Parliamentary
seats and ministries are not owned by anyone; they belong to the people,”
Al-Rahi said in his Sunday sermon. “Lebanon is suffering from many internal
crises. Now that the parliamentary elections are over, Christians forces
ought to work on building unity,” he added.
Berri Sources: Vote Plunged Lebanon into
Dangerous Phase
Naharnet/May 20/18/The latest parliamentary elections have plunged the
country into a dangerous phase due to the “sectarian incitement” that marred
the electoral campaigns, sources close to Speaker Nabih Berri have said,
while noting that “there is insistence on overcoming this situation after
the polls.”“The Baabda meeting between President Michel Aoun and Speaker
Berri focused on key issues such as the Syrian refugee crisis, the economic
situation and the regional situation,” the sources told Asharq al-Awsat
newspaper in remarks published Sunday. The two leaders “stressed that
Lebanon should not waste the chance that was provided by the CEDRE
conference,” the sources added, referring to an international meeting for
supporting Lebanon's economy that was held in Paris. “Speaker Berri had
already discussed these topics with Prime Minister Saad Hariri,” the sources
revealed.
Berri and Hariri “fully agreed on the need to accomplish two essential
events: the election of a Speaker and a Parliament Bureau and the formation
of a new government, especially that the president had previously announced
that his term would only kick off after the elections.”The sources also
noted that “the shape of the parliamentary and political blocs has not yet
crystallized,” adding that the picture might become clearer with the
formation of the new government.
Jumblat Meets Berri, Endorses Ferzli for Deputy
Speaker
Naharnet/May 20/18/Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat on
Sunday held talks in Ain el-Tineh with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri.
Jumblat was accompanied by MP Ghazi Aridi of his Democratic Gathering bloc.
After the meeting, Jumblat confirmed that the PSP's MPs will vote for Berri
in a parliamnetary session widely expected to see the Speaker re-elected for
a sixth term as head of parliament, a post he has occupied since 1992.
Jumblat also announced that he will instruct his bloc's MPs to vote for
veteran politician Elie al-Ferzli for the deputy speaker post.
Ferzli, who is now close to President Michel Aoun, had served as deputy
speaker in the past. Berri and Jumblat have maintained good ties since the
days of the 1975-1990 civil war.
LF Says Hariri-Geagea Talks 'Turned Page on
Disagreement'
Naharnet/May 20/18/The latest meeting between Prime Minister Saad Hariri and
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geageaa “has turned the page on the
disagreement of the past months” between the two parties, an LF official
said. Geagea “wanted the meeting to be the beginning of a new and productive
political phase that can improve people's lives and restore confidence with
the formation of the new government, after benefiting from the positive
shock that was created by the elections,” LF spokesman Charles Jabbour told
Asharq al-Awsat newspaper in remarks published Sunday.
He noted that the meeting at the Center House “laid the foundations for the
new phase, starting by keenness on sovereignty, the rise of a real state and
rapprochement and communication with the sovereign forces over issues
related to sovereignty.”Jabbour added: “The relation between al-Mustaqbal
Movement and the LF has been restored and coordination mechanisms have been
devised based on the belief in sovereignty that both Hariri and Geagea
share.” He also noted that “there is an agreement between the two parties in
the government and regarding the general policies, which starts with issues
related to sovereignty and involves social issues among other
files.”Relations between the LF and Mustaqbal were strained after some
Mustaqbal officials accused the LF of encouraging Saudi leaders to force
Hariri to resign in November. The row was also linked to Geagea's statement
following Hariri's shock resignation from Saudi Arabia that the premier
should have resigned earlier and that "no self-respecting person would stay
in the government after all the events of the past few months."
Qaouq: Saudi Doesn't Want Hizbullah in New Govt.
Naharnet/May 20/18/A senior Hizbullah official on Sunday accused Saudi
Arabia of seeking to keep his group out of the new Lebanese government.
"Saudi Arabia's declared and undeclared wish is to see Hizbullah outside the
new Lebanese government, but the coming days will prove that the Saudi
regime is weaker than being able to prevent Hizbullah from joining the
government with proactive ministers," Hizbullah Central Council member
Sheikh Nabil Qaouq said. He stressed that "Lebanon is not the right arena
for Saudi Arabia to achieve gains at the expense of the resistance," adding
that "the Lebanese arena will remain immune to Saudi diktats and orders."The
Hizbullah official also charged that "the same as Saudi Arabia interfered in
the parliamentary elections, today it is involved in efforts to form a
parliamentary front aimed at confronting and besieging the resistance in
order to weaken it and exhaust it."
Nadine Labaki Dedicates Her Cannes Prize to Poor
Kids
Naharnet/May 20/18/Lebanese filmmaker Nadine Labaki, who won one of the top
prizes at Cannes on Saturday with a story of dirt poor children and
migrants, dedicated her award to her impoverished amateur cast and her
homeland. Labaki is the first Arab woman to have won a major prize at the
festival and only the second to have had a film competing for the Palme
d'Or. Her stirring film "Capernaum", whose 13-year-old Syrian refugee lead
captured hearts in Cannes, had been tipped to win the Palme in a bumper
years for films from North Africa and the Middle East. Accepting the
third-placed Jury Prize, Labaki said her thoughts were with a 12-year-old
cast member, who she discovered selling tissues on the street, and who had
probably again spent the day with "her face pressed against car windows." "I
really think about them (the cast). I hope the film will enable the voices
of these children to be better heard and trigger a debate," she told
reporters. The glamorous 44-year-old added that she was "almost ashamed to
be wearing such beautiful dresses" to promote her film about a boy who takes
his parents to court for bringing him into a miserable, loveless existence.
"Capernaum", which won a 15-minute standing ovation at its premiere,
catapults her into the big league after "Caramel", her intimate debut about
a Beirut beauty parlor, and "Where Do We Go Now?", about women on a mission
to end sectarian violence in their village. In an interview with AFP this
week she said that while she had previously amplified women's voices she
"never really felt pressure to talk about women just because I am a woman."
"There are other things bothering me now," she said. "I'm thinking of the
notion of borders, of having to have papers to exist, of being completely
excluded from the system if you don't have them, of the maltreatment of
children, modern slavery, immigrant workers, Syrian immigrants."She does not
spare the rod with her homeland in "Capernaum", at the risk of being accused
by the Lebanese of washing their dirty laundry in public. But as she
triumphed at Cannes, Labaki was gracious with her country, "which, despite
everything it is accused of, gets by as best it can," she said. "It has
welcomed the most refugees in the world (relative to its population),
despite not having have the means to meet the needs of its own population."
But, she appealed: "We cannot continue to turn our back and remain blind to
the suffering of these children who try their best to make their way in this
capernaum (confused jumble) that the world has become."
Father's dream fulfilled
Labaki grew up during Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war to a father who missed
out on his dream of becoming a filmmaker. "I said to my father, 'One day I
will go to Cannes. So I have helped my father fulfill his dreams'," she said
Saturday. She came face-to-face with the idea for her feature when she was
driving home from a party and saw a child half-asleep in the arms of his
mother begging on the pavement. "It became an obsession for me... I did more
than three years of research. I was trying to understand how the system
fails these kids." Zain Al Rafeea, who has been working as a delivery boy in
Beirut until recently -- and who has only just learned to write his name --
turns in a performance in "Capernaum" that had critics brushing away tears.
Being a mother helped Labaki craft some of the most moving scenes, featuring
a gurgling breast-fed baby for which Zain has to fend after its migrant
mother is arrested. But she expressed reservations about the campaign for
gender quotas in film casts and crews spearheaded by Hollywood actresses in
the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal. "It's not just because we decide
that there should be parity in a given domain that it is truly merited.
Whether it's a man or a woman it must be truly on merit," she told AFP.
Hariri Says 'Entire Lebanon Proud' of Labaki's
Cannes Win
Naharnet/May 20/18/Prime Minister Saad Hariri was quick to congratulate
Lebanese filmmaker Nadine Labaki on winning one of the top prizes at the
Cannes festival overnight Saturday. “Congratulations to the director Nadine
Labaki and all the crew of the film Capernaum on winning the Jury Prize at
the Cannes cinema festival,” Hariri tweeted. “Entire Lebanon is proud of
your success, Nadine,” the premier added. Labaki dedicated her award to her
impoverished amateur cast and her homeland. Labaki is the first Arab woman
to have won a major prize at the festival and only the second to have had a
film competing for the Palme d'Or. Her stirring film "Capernaum", whose
13-year-old Syrian refugee lead captured hearts in Cannes, had been tipped
to win the Palme in a bumper years for films from North Africa and the
Middle East. Accepting the third-placed Jury Prize, Labaki said her thoughts
were with a 12-year-old cast member, who she discovered selling tissues on
the street, and who had probably again spent the day with "her face pressed
against car windows."The glamorous 44-year-old added that she was "almost
ashamed to be wearing such beautiful dresses" to promote her film about a
boy who takes his parents to court for bringing him into a miserable,
loveless existence. "Capernaum", which won a 15-minute standing ovation at
its premiere, catapults her into the big league after "Caramel", her
intimate debut about a Beirut beauty parlor, and "Where Do We Go Now?",
about women on a mission to end sectarian violence in their village. As she
triumphed at Cannes, Labaki was gracious with her country, "which, despite
everything it is accused of, gets by as best it can," she said. Lebanon "has
welcomed the most refugees in the world (relative to its population),
despite not having have the means to meet the needs of its own population,"
Labaki said.
Report: Franjieh, Miqati Won’t Join Parliament Blocs
Naharnet/May 20/18/The Marada Movement of MP Suleiman Franjieh said that
negotiations with ex-PM and MP-elect Najib Miqati to form a joint
parliamentary bloc “did not lead to positive results,” al-Akhbar daily
reported on Saturday. “Discussions with the former prime minister about
joining the parliamentary bloc which Franjieh seeks to form in the
parliament did not heap positive results,” Marada sources told the daily.
MP-elect Toni Franjieh, son of Suleiman, and Miqati have won seats in
Tripoli’s parliamentary elections. “Miqati refuses to join a bloc that is
not under his chairmanship,” they said, adding “he is a former prime
minister and has big popularity in the north which made him the first winner
in his electoral district.” Al-Joumhouria daily on the other hand said, “the
two men were in perfect agreement during a meeting they held on Friday, and
that they have agreed to put efforts together in the interests of the
North.”However, at the political level they reportedly agreed to work as two
separate blocs.“Mikati will continue his contacts to form a parliamentary
bloc with independent deputies,” said al-Joumhouria.
'Phoenician Ship' made of plastic bottles sails
from Byblos to Beirut Port
Sun 20 May 2018 / NNA - A Phoenician-style boat made of plastic bottles
embarked Sunday morning from the shores of the Port of Byblos, sailing
towards the Port of Beirut, in a novel environmental initiative by the
Chreek Society, in cooperation with the Lebanese American University -
Byblos Campus and Byblos Municipality. Partaking in this
cultural-environmental event was Culture Ministry Director-General Ali Samad,
representing Culture Minister Ghattas Khoury, Mayor of Jbeil Wissam Zaarour,
Lebanese American University President Joseph Jabbra, and Chreek Association
Head George Ghafari, alongside Lebanese Red Cross and Civil Defense
officials, LAU faculty and students and Byblos residents. In his word
marking the event, Zaarour described the initiative as "an environmental
symbol because the boat is made of 50,000 plastic bottles aimed at raising
awareness about the dangers of this type of waste, in addition to its
cultural symbolism by embodying the Phoenician vessels that were used for
trade and export of Lebanese Cedar wood through the Jbeil coast."Zaarour
named the vessel as, "Phoenician Ship", for its distinctive symbolism,
praising the efforts of the Chreek Association and LAU students who worked
relentlessly to yield this achievement. Outlining the initiative objectives,
Zaarour said the project aims at drawing attention to the environmental
damage caused by non-sorting of waste, especially plastic waste that does
not decompose in nature, and reviving the history of Phoenician Lebanon,
which was famous for its manufacture of ships, contributing to the
development of civilizations.
ElKhalil: Internal, regional challenges entail
acceleration of national unity government formation
Sun 20 May 2018/NNA - Member of the "Development and Liberation"
Parliamentary Bloc, MP Anwar El-Khalil, deemed Sunday that "the internal and
regional challenges render it imperative to accelerate the formation of a
strong national unity government." Speaking before official and popular
delegations who came to congratulate him on his re-election, El-Khalil said,
"The Development and Liberation Bloc, headed by House Speaker Nabih Berri,
is determined to push the internal political movement towards forming a
government of national unity, capable of facing the internal economic,
political and financial challenges, alongside the serious challenges at the
regional level." He confirmed that under these circumstances, Lebanon will
stick to its elements of strength, namely its national unity and its "army,
people and resistance" golden equation, until the cloud of threats and greed
towards our land and sovereignty withers away. Referring to US President
Donald Trump's decision to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem, Khalil deemed
it "a historic mistake that will not change any equation," adding, "Israel
is a usurping state and Jerusalem is the capital of the State of
Palestine...the American decision does not give the occupying state any
legitimacy." El-Khalil concluded by stressing that the "Development and
Liberation" Bloc and other political allies are open to dialogue over the
national defense strategy in light of surrounding threats, and is determined
to implement the full provisions of the Taef Accord and the Constitution
en-route to "building a state of citizenship and the abolition of political
sectarianism."
Bou Assi says transparency and sovereignty are
Lebanese Forces objectives
Sun 20 May 2018/NNA - Social Affairs Minister, Deputy-elect Pierre Bou Assi,
said Sunday that transparency and sovereignty were the objectives of the
Lebanese Forces Party. In an interview to "Radio Orient" Station, Bou Assi
said that there is no point in involving Lebanon in regional conflicts,
especially as the country suffers from a socio-economic crisis. He added
that the self-distancing policy serves Lebanon's national benefit, deeming
it a "sacred national duty." Referring to relations between Saudi Arabia and
the Lebanese Forces, Bou Assi described them as "good and in favor of
Lebanon, without any interference in internal affairs," noting that LF
partisans were working to defend the self-distancing principle in service of
the country's higher interests. Asked about LF's relation with the "Future
Movement", Bou Assi said, "What brings us together is a thousand times more
than what separates us...and supporters of the two parties have proved their
desire for both leaders to establish mutual understanding." Reiterating that
the two main objectives of the Lebanese Forces were transparency and
sovereignty, he said that this position meant attachment to the State. "We
want to anchor the concept of the State and total sovereignty, by which we
refuse to have any armed party inside Lebanon, regardless of its affinity,"
Bou Assi underscored. The Social Affairs Minister stressed that "the needs
and priorities of the State must be defined so that the government becomes
productive and homogenous." He also highlighted the need to build the State
in terms of harmony and coordination, in order to fortify unity and
coexistence in the country.
Sanctions on Hezbollah will hinder cabinet
formation
Sun 20 May 2018/NNA - Minister of Education
and Higher Learning, Marwan Hamadeh, deemed Sunday that "the new U.S.
sanctions on Hezbollah will hamper the government formation." Hamadeh, whose
words came during an interview to "Voice of Lebanon" Radio Station this
morning, urged the Lebanese counterparts to exert effort to "keep Lebanon
away from political disputes in order to preserve its security and
stability."
Batroun Festivals launch their activities for Summer 2018, Guidanian, Bassil
confirm their international standards
Sun 20 May 2018/NNA - Batroun International Festivals Committee launched
Sunday its program for the Summer of 2018 in a press conference held at the
"Emigrants House" in Batroun, in presence of Foreign and Emigrants Minister
Gebran Bassil and Tourism Minister Avedis Guidanian and several prominent
dignitaries. In his word on the occasion, Minister Guidanian said, "The
diversity and excellence that Batroun and every town and city in Lebanon
offers is the most important...because the festival is the place where we
share in portraying what is of value, significance and distinction."
Guidanian commended the Batroun Festivals and all other international
festivals taking place in various parts of Lebanon, "a nation that enjoys
profound elements of nature, civilization, history and culture...a nation in
which we may find something special in every corner, knowing that there are
numerous other countries that do not have 10% of our cultural treasures,
heritage, religious, historical and tourism resources," he asserted. In
turn, Bassil deemed that today's gathering is a "new expression of the
Batrounis' love for life and their desire to live in their city and nation
the life they ought to live." "Summertime this year carries all goodness,
tourism, stability and prosperity, and this is our hope," he added. "The
Lebanese are thriving to confront all difficult and critical challenges, and
are turning out victorious in the end, capable of preserving Lebanon, the
nation of beauty and life," Bassil underscored. He concluded by thanking the
Tourism Minister for partaking in today's launching event and for his
support and contribution to all tourism activities, especially such
remarkable festivals of world standards taking place on Lebanese soil.
Latest LCCC
Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on May 20-21/18
In first US foreign policy speech, Pompeo to discuss ‘totality of Iran’s
threats’
Reuters, Washington/20 May 2018
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will outline a “diplomatic road map” and
call for broad support from European and other allies to apply pressure on
Iran to force it back to the negotiating table, a senior US official said on
Friday, as Washington seeks to chart a course after it pulled out of a
landmark nuclear deal. Rebuffing appeals from France, Germany and Britain,
U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew the United States 10 days ago from the
2015 nuclear deal between Iran and six major powers and ordered that
sanctions be reimposed on Tehran. In his first foreign policy speech on
Monday, Pompeo will call for broad support to address “the totality of
Iran’s threats,” said Brian Hook, senior US policy advisor. Hook said US
officials hoped economic pressure from renewed sanctions would lead Iran
back to the table as it did a few years ago, leading to the 2015 nuclear
accord. But it was not immediately clear whether the Europeans would support
the plan as they try to salvage investment and trade ties with Tehran that
followed the accord.
Hook said Washington was seeking a diplomatic outcome with Iran and
sanctions were part of that. “The goal of our effort is to bring all
necessary pressure to bear on Iran to change its behavior and to pursue a
new framework that can resolve our concerns,” Hook told reporters. “We very
much want to be, to have a kind of up-tempo diplomacy, one that’s very
focused and very determined to achieve our national security objectives,” he
said, adding: “We need a new ... framework that’s going to address the
totality of Iran threats.”A senior European official whose country is party
to the deal said there were concerns that the Trump administration was
interested in pursuing “the maximum pressure and brutal show of strength
idea” instead of negotiating. “We say that there has to be a negotiating
method but if they are purely in the maximum pressure and brutal show of
strength idea and they believe it will work because they believe it worked
with North Korea then we will have a major problem,” the official said. The
threat of US sanctions has already forced some European companies to pull
back from Iran. German lender DZ Bank said it will suspend its financial
transactions with Iran in July, while French gas and power group Engie also
said it would end its contracts in Iran by November. This week, the US
Treasury imposed sanctions against Iranian finance officials and financiers
it said were linked to Iran-backed Hezbollah. Hook played down differences
between the United States and Europe over Iran.
“We have a period of opportunity to work with our allies to try to come up
with a new security architecture, a new framework,” he said, adding: “I
think people are overstating the disagreements between the US and
Europe.”Trump said the 2015 agreement did not adequately curb Iran’s nuclear
ambitions or address Iran’s ballistic missile program and what the Trump
administration views as its destabilizing role in the region.
Under the agreement Tehran agreed to limits on its nuclear program in
exchange for the lifting of sanctions against it. Iran has denied it sought
in the past to develop an atomic weapon, saying its nuclear program has
always been for purely peaceful purposes. Hook said the Iran nuclear accord
had given countries a false sense of security and the United States wanted
to ensure any new agreement covered not only Iran’s nuclear and missile
capabilities, but also curbed its regional activities. “This involves a
range of things around its nuclear program, missiles, proliferating missiles
and missile technology and support for terrorists and its aggressive and
violent activities that fuel civil wars in Syria and Yemen,” said Hook.In
recent days, US officials have highlighted protests in Iran to illustrate
economic discontent among Iranians and a reason Iran should return to talks.
At least one person was killed and six others wounded in the southern city
of Kazeroon, according to the semi-official Fars news agency on Thursday.
Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani has assured Iranians that their oil-reliant
economy can withstand new sanctions. “You have seen the protests in Iran and
people have publicly expressed their dissatisfaction with a lot of the
policies of the regime, which have not helped the Iranian people,” said
Hook. Later, as he met his Dutch counterpart at the State Department, Pompeo
also tweeted about the protests.
First ISIS fighters evacuate south Damascus
around Yarmouk Camp
AFP, BeirutSunday, 20 May 2018 ظA first batch of Islamic State group
fighters left their final stronghold in Syria’s capital early Sunday under a
deal struck after weeks of fierce combat, a monitor said. “At dawn, six
buses of ISIS fighters and their relatives left the Yarmuk Palestinian
refugee camp and adjacent district of Tadamun,” said Rami Abdel Rahman, head
of the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Abdel Rahman said
the buses headed east for Syria’s vast desert, where ISIS still controls
some territory. He had no details on how many people were aboard the
vehicles, but said a majority of them were relatives of jihadists and not
armed. The evacuations came a day after an apparent deal was reached to put
an end to a ferocious month-long offensive to oust ISIS from its last
positions in southern Damascus. Pro-regime forces, specifically Palestinian
militias, had been fighting since April 19 to recapture Yarmuk, Tadamun, and
the nearby districts of Qadam and Hajar al-Aswad from ISIS. The assault had
killed more than 250 pro-regime forces and another 233 ISIS fighters,
according to the Observatory. Fighting died down around midday on Saturday
amid reports that an evacuation deal could be reached. Syrian state media on
Sunday denied evacuations were taking place in Hajar al-Aswad, but did not
mention departures from Yarmuk or Tadamun. Once a thriving district home to
some 160,000 Palestinians and Syrians, Yarmuk’s population has fallen to
just a few hundred people.
Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr meets PM Abadi,
hinting at coalition
Staff writer, Al Arabiya EnglishSunday, 20 May 2018 /A meeting between
nationalist cleric Moqtada Sadr and Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi was
held a day after the announcement of the Iraqi parliamentary election
results to reaffirm close ties between both parties in forming a future
government, a source close to Sadr revealed. A statement released by Abadi
on Saturday said that the meeting with Sadr came for the sake of working
together to speed up the process of forming a new government, and ensure
that the government will be strong, provide services for the people and job
opportunities, as well as increasing people’s standard of living and fight
corruption. “During our meeting, we agreed to work together and with other
parties to expedite the process of forming a new Iraqi government,” Abadi
said at a joint press conference. The statement added that there was an
understanding between both parties in the meeting that the future government
needs to be inclusive. Sadr said that the meeting is a message of
reassurance that the next government will be a “paternal” one, including and
caring for all people of Iraq. “We extend our hands to everyone building the
country, and for the decision to be an Iraqi one,” Sadr said, reaffirming
the importance of speeding the government forming process that prioritizes
the Iraqi people’s needs. Abadi called on all other blocs to accept the
results and to follow legal procedures if they would like to object. He also
stressed on the need for those who won the election to begin their role and
tasks in parliament as soon as possible. Two days ago, Sadr invited Ammar
al-Hakim, leader of the al-Hikma bloc who won 20 seats in parliament
trailing in seventh place, to create a joint vision for the future. Sadr’s
Sairoon electoral list captured 54 parliamentary seats, 12 more than Abadi’s.
Winning the largest number of seats does not automatically guarantee that
Sadr will be able to hand-pick a prime minister. Parties will have to align
themselves to try and form a bloc large enough for the parliamentary
majority necessary to nominate a candidate. The government should be formed
within 90 days of the official results, but negotiations are expected to
drag on for months. The election dealt a blow to Abadi, but he could still
emerge as a compromise candidate palatable to all sides because he has
managed the competing interests of the United States and Iran - unwitting
allies in the war against Islamic State - during his term in office. With
Reuters
Europe, China, Russia discussing new deal for Iran
Reuters/Arab News/May 20/2018
US President Donald Trump pulled the US out of a 2015 nuclear accord with
Iran, saying that the deal did not stop Iran from pursuing its nuclear
ambitions and missile program. Iran has struggled to achieve financial
benefits from the deal, partly because remaining unilateral US sanctions
over its missile program deterred major Western investors from doing
business with Tehran. BERLIN: Diplomats from Europe, China and Russia are
discussing a new accord to offer Iran financial aid to curb its ballistic
missile development and meddling in the region, in the hope of salvaging its
2015 nuclear deal, a German newspaper reported on Sunday. The officials will
meet in Vienna in the coming week under the leadership of senior European
Union diplomat Helga Schmid to discuss next steps after the May 8 decision
by US President Donald Trump to pull out of a 2015 nuclear accord with Iran,
the Welt am Sonntag newspaper said, citing senior EU sources. Germany,
France, Britain, Russia and China would participate in the meeting, but the
United States would not, it said. It was not immediately clear if Iran —
which has resisted calls to curb its ballistic missile program in the past —
would take part. Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to curb its nuclear
program in return for the lifting of most Western sanctions. One of the main
complaints of the Trump administration was that the accord did not cover
Iran’s missile program or its support for armed groups in the Middle East
which the West considers terrorists. Concluding a new agreement that would
maintain the nuclear provisions and curb ballistic missile development
efforts and Tehran’s activities in the region could help convince Trump to
lift sanctions against Iran, the paper said. “We have to get away from the
name ‘Vienna nuclear agreement’ and add in a few additional elements. Only
that will convince President Trump to agree and lift sanctions again,” the
paper quoted a senior EU diplomat as saying. No immediate comment was
available from the German foreign ministry. The EU’s energy chief sought to
reassure Iran on Saturday that the 28-member bloc remained committed to
salvaging the nuclear deal, and strengthening trade with Tehran. Officials
from the EU, Germany and other countries that remain committed to the deal
have said it would disastrous if EU efforts fail to preserve it. Iran has
struggled to achieve financial benefits from the deal, partly because
remaining unilateral US sanctions over its missile program deterred major
Western investors from doing business with Tehran. The officials are looking
for a new approach given an understanding that it would be difficult for
European firms to work around new US sanctions, the newspaper reported. It
said the new deal could include billions of dollars of financial aid for
Iran, in line with an EU deal that provided billions in aid to Turkey for
taking in millions of migrants and closing its borders, which helped end a
2015 migrant crisis. Iran and European powers have made a good start in
talks over how to salvage the 2015 deal but much depends on what happens in
the next few weeks, Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif said last week.
Iraq: Battle for
Largest Parliamentary Bloc Heats Up
Baghdad – Hamza Mustapha/Asharq Al Awsat/May 20/18/Parliament was unable to
achieve a quorum for the convening of the emergency meeting, which was
attended by only 105 deputies. A battle meant to form the largest
parliamentary bloc in Iraq heated up Saturday after the election commission
released the final results for the May 12 elections, which confirmed the
victory of the Sayirun alliance of Muqtada al-Sadr and the Communist Party
with most seats in parliament's total 329 members. The Fatah alliance came
second with 47 seats, while the Victory (Nasr) alliance of incumbent Prime
Minister Haider al-Abadi came third with 42 seats. During the weekend, the
residence of al-Sadr in Al-Najaf became a destination for Iraqi leaders
wishing to win the support of the Shiite cleric who had tipped the balance
by winning 54 seats in the new Parliament. Fifteen days after final election
results are released, the new parliament must hold its first session to
choose the new Speaker before a new president is elected to then ask the
largest parliamentary bloc to form a cabinet. It seems al-Sadr’s Sayirun
alliance, the Victory alliance and the National Hikma (Wisdom) Movement
headed by leader Ammar al-Hakim will be joining hands to form the biggest
parliamentary bloc by allying with Sunni parties similar to Al-Wataniya
Coalition, led by Iraq Vice President Ayad Allawi and Al-Qarar coalition led
by Osama al-Nujaifi. Observers believe that the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP),
headed by Masoud Barzani, could join al-Sadr’s parliamentary bloc. On the
other hand, Iran is weaving the threads of another bloc headed by Hadi al
Ameri’s Conquest Alliance (al-Fatah) and former premier Nuri al-Maliki’s
State of Law Coalition.Early this week, Iranian Revolutionary Guards
commander General Qassem Suleimani was in Baghdad for talks with his Shiite
allies to save Tehran’s influences in Iraq. The Iraqi Parliament failed
Saturday to hold an emergency session aimed to discuss the results of the
recent parliamentary elections after failing to achieve a quorum.
Iran Relies on Europe for Saving its Oil Exports
London - Asharq Al-Awsat/Sunday, 20 May, 2018/Iranian Oil Minister Bijan
Zanganeh said on Saturday that US President Donald Trump’s decision to quit
a multinational nuclear deal would not affect Tehran’s oil exports if the
European Union could salvage the pact. After meeting with EU's Energy Chief
Miguel Arias Canete, Zanganeh told reporters that every new decision in OPEC
needs unanimity. "I believe that if the European Union helps us... the level
of the oil exports of Iran will not change," added the Iranian minister. US
Treasury indicated, following Trump’s decision on May 8, Washington would
reimpose a wide array of Iran-related sanctions after the expiry of 90- and
180-day periods, including sanctions aimed at Iran’s oil sector and
transactions with its central bank. EU wants to salvage the nuclear deal,
which offers the Islamic Republic relief from economic sanctions in exchange
for curbs on its nuclear program. Europe sees the agreement as an important
element of international security. Meanwhile, BP Chief Executive Bob Dudley
expects a flood of US shale and the reopening of OPEC taps to cool the oil
market after crude rose above $80 a barrel this week.
Trump’s decision to exit an international nuclear deal with Iran and revive
sanctions on the OPEC member country, as well as Venezuela’s plummeting
output, has helped to lift oil prices to their highest since 2014. Speaking
to Reuters, Dudley said that BP sees oil falling to between $50 and $65 a
barrel due to surging shale output and OPEC’s capacity to boost production.
“Clearly the withdrawal of the United States from the Iran nuclear deal has
brought a lot of uncertainty to the market,” he said in an interview. Crude
exports from Iran, OPEC's third-largest member, could drop by 300,000 to 1
million barrels per day as a result of US sanctions, based on BP internal
forecasts. Dudley said he expected the figure to be “at the lower end” of
the range. US Energy Information Administration boosted its forecast of
growth in domestic crude production in 2018 to an all-time high of 11.17
million bpd, as shale drillers accelerate activity. The surge in US output
has been offset by deep supply cuts for over a year by OPEC and other
producers including Russia.
Saudi Arabia, assured key consumers that the world would have adequate
supplies even if Iran’s exports dropped sharply. Markets have so far been
able to absorb oil’s rise without impacting demand growth, but Dudley said a
sustained crude price of over $80 would be unhealthy, adding: "I think when
you get above $80, it is not a healthy price either.""Two years ago, when
the price was $27, it was great for global growth, the engines of the
consuming economies, but it was terrible for producing countries and that
led to producing countries not being able to purchase things as well. That
was not a healthy price," added BP Chief Executive. Although International
Energy Agency (IEA) this week cut its outlook for oil demand growth in 2018
due to rising crude prices, BP still expects consumption to expand by 1.7
million bpd, extending a period of strong growth. The world has experienced
an unprecedented decade of economic growth that is likely to continue even
with sanctions and trade tensions between the United States and China,
Dudley said. "We’re about to begin to see political factors creating trade
dislocations, sanctions and things like that. They will have impacts here
and there but the overall economic growth rates appear to be not
overheated," he said. Commenting on Saudi Arabia’s claims that the situation
on the global oil market remains unbalanced, Russian Energy Minister
Alexander Novak said on Friday that it will take time to assess if oil
prices remain volatile or not.
On Friday, oil prices fell but Brent crude was on track for a sixth straight
week of gains, boosted by plummeting Venezuelan production, strong global
demand and looming US sanctions on Iran. The global benchmark on Thursday
broke through $80 for the first time since November 2014, and investors
anticipate more gains due to supply concerns, at least in the short-term.
Brent has gained about 20 percent since the start of the year. US West Texas
Intermediate crude futures for June delivery dropped 21 cents to $71.28 a
barrel, a 0.3 percent loss. The contract was on track for a third straight
week of gains.
Saudi Air Defenses Intercept Houthi Ballistic Missile
Asharq Al-Awsat/Saturday, 19 May, 2018/Saudi air defenses intercepted on
Saturday a ballistic missile fired by the Iran-backed Houthis militias
towards its territories.Spokesman for the coalition to restore legitimacy in
Yemen Colonel Turki al-Maliki said that the missile was fired from Yemen’s
Saada province towards the Kingdom. Soon after, the missiles fired another
missile, which was detected by Saudi air defenses. It crashed in an
uninhabited desert area. Maliki said that the second rocket was fired
towards the city of Khamis Mushait. He accused the militias of deliberately
firing missiles towards populated areas, deeming such attacks a violation of
International Humanitarian Law. He added that hostile Houthi attacks against
the Kingdom demonstrate that Iran was still arming the militias with weapons
in blatant violation and defiance of United Nations resolutions.
4 Rebels Dead in Attack on Church in Chechnya
Asharq Al-Awsat/Saturday, 19 May, 2018/Four rebels were killed during an
attack on a church in the Russian republic of Chechnya, officials said on
Saturday. The Investigative Committee, Russia's top investigative agency,
said two police officers were killed and another two were wounded in the
clash. One churchgoer also died dead and another one was wounded. "According
to early information, two policemen in charge of security at the church ...
and a civilian were killed," the officials said. They added that "four
rebels have been eliminated" while two other policemen were hurt. They also
indicated a knife and a gun were found on the attackers behind the assault
targeting the Archangel Michael church in central Grozny, and said police
had prevented "more serious consequences and a larger number of victims."
Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov had earlier told Russian news agencies that
rebels acting "on the orders of a Western country" were seeking "to take
believers hostage" in a troubled republic where Russia has fought two fierce
wars with separatists over the past 20 years. The attack underscored
security challenges in Russia as it prepares to host the Fifa football World
Cup next month. Grozny is not scheduled to host any World Cup games, but the
Egyptian team planned to use it as a training base. Kadyrov said the gunmen
also carried axes and Molotov cocktails. He praised police officers who
guarded the church for their courage and said the region would help the
families of the officers who died. The Chechen leader said three of the
attackers were residents of Chechnya and one came from a neighboring region.
U.S., French Fire
Backs Advance against IS in East Syria.
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 20/18/Arab and Kurdish fighters were
advancing on Sunday against the Islamic State group in eastern Syria thanks
to close artillery support from allied American and French forces, a monitor
said.
Earlier this month, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) launched an assault
with help from the U.S.-led coalition against IS fighters hiding out in a
small sliver of desert territory near the Iraqi border. The jihadists
control three main villages -- Hajjin, Sousa, and Al-Shaafa -- which all
fall in Syria's eastern Deir Ezzor province. The SDF was closing in on
Hajjin on Sunday after capturing a nearby hilltop the previous day,
according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. "There are intense
clashes around Hajjin, and the SDF is advancing thanks to American and
French artillery fire," Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman told AFP. He said
coalition forces had been backing the SDF's operations with air strikes but
switched to artillery as they drew closer to IS. The coalition confirmed on
Twitter that "artillery from France" was supporting operations to defeat IS
in the Euphrates River Valley. The SDF and their Western allies are present
east of Syria's Euphrates River, which cuts diagonally across Deir Ezzor
province. Rival regime forces, backed by Russia, are present on the western
bank of the river. The SDF has already driven IS out of large parts of
northern and eastern Syria, including the onetime jihadist capital of Raqa,
with help from the coalition's air strikes, weapons and special forces
advisers
Syria Rehab Center Seeks to Tame 'Caliphate Cubs'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 20/18/Thirteen-year-old Hassan may have
committed atrocities for the Islamic State group, but instead of jailing him
immediately, the Kurdish authorities in northeastern Syria enrolled him in a
rehabilitation center. He was one of around 80 teenagers sporting trainers
and tracksuits as they filled their lungs with chilly morning air in the
courtyard of the Hori Center in Tal Maarouf. Aged 12 to 17, they had all
been detained by Kurdish fighters or the U.S.-led Western forces who
supported them during the battle to destroy the jihadists' self-styled "caliphate."Some
are children of IS families, whose parents may be in jail, while others were
directly recruited -- forcibly or voluntarily -- by the jihadist group.
After their capture, they were selected for "rehabilitation" in line with
the "second chance policy" of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) which
controls the region. Local officials admit their prisons are full and say
they are hoping a constructive approach can help mend ties with local tribes
that once backed the jihadists. It was early 2018 when Hassan checked into
the Hori Center, months after the opening of the sprawling complex of
red-brick rooms and dorms framing a rectangular lawn. As the son of a senior
IS commander in the Syrian city of Raqa, once the de facto capital of the
jihadists' proto-state, he regularly witnessed beheadings. The Kurdish
forces who captured him found a picture that shows him proudly holding a
severed head, but whether the boy ever killed anyone himself isn't clear.
"When he arrived, like many of them, he didn't say hi, didn't shake our
hands and didn't look us in the eye," said Roka Khalil, one of the center's
two directors.
- 'Easily fixed' -
The center is run by two secular women and its boarders are asked to shave
and give up their traditional garments for Western-style clothes. Moving
there was a culture shock for Hassan. Like other teenagers IS called the
"cubs of the caliphate", he had been subjected to the group's efforts to
impose its brand of violence and religious conservatism on an entire
generation. Now, some of those youngsters are housed in dormitories where
they have no access to phones or the internet but where staff are available
day and night, said Abir Khaled, the center's co-director. "We consider them
as humans, as victims of the war," she said.While most of the children are
Syrian, the centre also hosts former "cubs" from countries including Turkey
and Indonesia. Their days follow a strict routine that includes a lot of
sport, particularly volleyball, various chores on the compound and workshops
training them to become barbers and tailors. Also central to the
rehabilitation process is a curriculum that includes history, geography,
Arabic and Kurdish classes, as well as a "morality" class. Many have
experienced poverty, received very little education and grew up in tough
family environments. Four of them were dispatched by IS to carry out a
suicide operation but surrendered instead, according to the center's staff.
"It shows that their ideology is not that deep, and can be easily fixed,"
said Khalil.
Music replaces 'paradise'
A third of the Hori Center's "guests" have been sentenced to prison terms
ranging from six months to seven years, but Kurdish authorities believe they
can be rehabilitated if they are given a supportive environment. If their
conduct is good at Hori, their sentences may be reduced and they could be
released to their families within months. Hassan is now awaiting trial and
Khalil said he may be given a term of up to three years, although that could
be reduced. The Hori Center's egalitarian and social values are directly
inspired by those of the jailed leader of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers'
Party (PKK), Abdullah Ocalan. The charismatic leader, who has been
imprisoned by Turkey since 1999, is the main ideological reference of the
PYD, whose armed branch controls swathes of northern and eastern Syria.
Ocalan's portrait is plastered all over the region, where supporters see him
as a visionary leader but his critics denounce him as a Marxist autocrat --
or even a terrorist. The self-proclaimed Kurdish administration insists the
Hori Center is not designed to implant PYD ideology in the heads of its
young boarders, replacing one brainwashing with another. Yet at Qamishli's
Alaya prison, which AFP was allowed to visit and where some of Hori's
"patients" were previously detained, the wooden models carved by inmates
were often in the image of Ocalan. Khalil said it was too early to describe
the center's activities as a success, but stressed that results were already
tangible. "Today, lots of them come to talk to us by themselves," she said.
"Hassan doesn't insult his classmates any more when there is a dispute, he
doesn't believe in paradise and the virgins any more, he even listens to
music."
South Syria Factions Renew Fighting ISIS-affiliated
Group
London - Asharq Al-Awsat/Sunday, 20 May, 2018/The Free Syrian Army has
launched a new battle against Khalid ibn al-Walid Army that belongs to ISIS,
south Syria. El-Dorar Al- Shamia said Saturday that the Free Syrian Army
factions started a new battle in the purpose of kicking out Khalid ibn al-Walid
Army from Yarmouk Basin. Fierce clashes took place between the two sides,
coinciding with shelling on the group locations. The southern front factions
launched earlier several battles for the sake of restoring control over
regions ruled by Khalid ibn al-Walid Army. This army controls the majority
of Yarmouk Basin towns, and has launched a sudden attack in February 2017 in
which it took by force new towns, controlled earlier by the opposition
factions. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that the clashes were
renewed in the western strip of Daraa countryside in which Yarmouk Basin and
regions in the surrounding of Masakin Jalin witnessed a fire exchange
between Islamic factions and fighters of Khalid ibn al-Walid Army. These
clashes coincide with continuous reinforcement by Khalid ibn al-Walid Army
in regions ruled by it, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human
Rights. It has been monitored that the army threw fliers in regions
controlled by the Islamic fighters in western Daraa countryside. Further,
the Syrian regime forces and ISIS denied Saturday reaching an agreement by
which ISIS evacuates Yarmouk Camp. Russia Today reported from field sources
that the clashes between the two sides stopped since 12 noon and until 5 in
the morning. ISIS showed readiness to withdraw its members and families, a
total of 17000. ISIS announced that its members are still clashing with the
regime forces, noting that the death toll reached 900 since 28 days and 37
vehicles were destroyed.
Latest LCCC
Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on May 20-21/18
What’s Next with Iran?
David
Ignatius/The Washington Post/May 20/18
So what’s next with Iran? Even if you think President Trump has made a big
mistake in withdrawing from the nuclear agreement, as I do, that’s not the
end of the story. Where does this bumpy road lead?
What’s distressing about the Iran question is that nobody in this
administration seems to have a good answer. Trump’s move was a
chest-thumping political decision, not a clearly articulated strategy. An
inflection point for Iran may lie ahead, after the death of 78-year-old
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, but that could be years away. And his passing,
when it comes, could raise as many dangers for the United States and its
allies as opportunities. Think of an Iranian Saddam Hussein. Good policy
toward Iran should begin with a realistic assessment of the country. I’ve
visited Tehran twice, and each time was struck by two things: Iran is a
modern and sophisticated society, rich with promise, and its people dislike
the reactionary clerics who run the country’s political system. It’s a
nation yearning to be normal, and for its revolutionary nightmare to end.
That was one strategic rationale for President Barack Obama’s nuclear deal:
It offered the prospect of gradual normalization and growth, under the
relatively moderate leadership of President Hassan Rouhani. One of the
deal’s weaknesses, alas, was that Rouhani could never curb the regional
subversion campaign run by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps.
A sane Iran policy would bet on the people and not the regime; it would
avoid a risky war that would make Iraq look like a cakewalk. It would
promote the rise of a strong and stable democratic Iran as an American
national interest. And it would seek an eventual accommodation between a
post-revolutionary Iran and a modernizing Saudi Arabia.
A second essential requirement is to avoid shooting Europe when we’re
supposedly aiming at Iran. The most dangerous consequence of Trump’s policy
is that it may force a confrontation with Europe by making its companies
choose between doing business with Iran and the United States. Some Trump
supporters may think this sounds smart, but it isn’t. It creates ill will,
to no good purpose. And it may be a loser in international courts. A third
key task is to plan for economic instability in Iran and the Arabian Gulf
region. Iran is hustling to export oil while it can; traders in the bazaar
are rushing to get money out of the country; the Iranian currency will
weaken; unemployment and dislocation will grow. Trump may think he can
benefit from economic chaos, and perhaps over time he will. But right now,
the last thing the Middle East needs is another failed state — especially
when it might widen the sectarian wars in Iraq, Syria and Yemen, like a
zipper being ripped open. Trump has almost guaranteed that normalcy
won’t come anytime soon for Iran. By withdrawing from the nuclear agreement,
he has put that country on a slow boil. Trump may hope to bend Iranian
behavior without war. But there’s no sign that he has a plan for how to
accomplish that, nor a strategy for ending the wars in Syria and Yemen.
Trump’s first year as president unfortunately convinced him that his
trademark disruptive approach is a success. He thinks his bullying of North
Korea has worked, as has his trade-war rhetoric with China. So, of course,
he overturned the Iran nuclear agreement, too. The strangest aspect of
Trump’s gamble on Iran is that it’s so reminiscent of President George W.
Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003.
Russia Sets Out to Sanction Western Sanctions
Leonid Bershidsky/Bloomberg/May 20/18
Just as investment banks are cutting their growth forecasts for Russia
because of a growing likelihood of new U.S. sanctions, Russian legislators
are looking for a strong response. A proposal that could make it illegal to
obey the penalties received preliminary approval from the the parliament’s
lower chamber on Tuesday. It may not be Moscow’s final word, but it shows
the Russian political elite is leaning toward deeper self-isolation.
The bill, sponsored by the speakers of both chambers of parliament and the
leaders of all parliamentary factions, proposes a sentence of up to four
years in prison for applying any foreign sanctions in a way that restricts
the ability of Russian citizens or entities to perform “ordinary economic
operations or deals.” The U.S. and its allies initially imposed sanctions on
Russia in response to its aggression against Ukraine in 2014. At first, the
penalties focused on travel bans and asset freezes, but they were gradually
strengthened to restrict borrowing and access to U.S. technology for
state-controlled companies and to make it impossible for some businesses
deemed close to the Kremlin to trade with the U.S. More Russian companies
could be hit in another round of sanctions.
Given the prominence of the new bill’s sponsors, it’s likely that it
eventually will become law, but probably with some Kremlin-prompted
amendments. The giant state-controlled banks that are the backbone of
Russia’s financial system -- Sberbank and VTB -- are the obvious exceptions,
as neither has branches in Crimea. Although both banks are subject to U.S.
and European sanctions limiting their ability to borrow in Western markets,
working in Crimea would expose them to asset seizures and full-blown pariah
status.
“You can imagine the price of this matter for Sberbank, for the nation’s
financial system and Russia’s competitiveness,” Herman Gref, Sberbank’s
chief executive officer, said in 2017 of his decision to stay out of Crimea.
“There is no scheme that would allow us to work there without being hit by
the entire pool of sanctions.”A four-year sentence for Gref isn’t what the
legislators or President Vladimir Putin have in mind. Anatoly Aksakov, head
of the parliamentary committee for financial markets, says the big state
banks won’t be affected by the new law. This sets the stage either for
amendments that will specify exceptions or, just as likely, for the time-honored
Russian practice of selective application. The law can, for example, be used
against the executives of foreign companies that operate in Russia and who
refuse to deal with sanctioned companies (including much of the Russian
defense industry) or take on projects or clients in Crimea. Germany’s
Siemens, whose gas turbines ended up in Crimea last year, responded by
fighting in the courts, withdrawing from a Russian joint venture and
stopping supplies of energy equipment to Russia. Its managers would be
obvious targets for the new bill. Exxon Mobil, which has scrapped some
Russian projects because of sanctions but retained a strong presence in the
country, could also be affected.
Generally, the bill targets any multinationals whose activity in Russia is
restricted by the sanctions. That’s a potential blow to investment even as
the U.S. government is more willing to introduce restrictions that can
really hurt Russian companies: Rusal, the aluminum giant is threatened with
losing its U.S. business, which accounted for 14.4 percent of revenue last
year. “The impact of the sanctions could be viewed as similar to that of the
demise of Yukos,” Goldman Sachs wrote in a report this week, recalling the
Russian government’s takeover of the country’s biggest oil company in the
2000s. “The Yukos shock did lead to a significant slowdown in activity, and
in investment activity in particular." Morgan Stanley predicted that the
sanctions would “reduce private sector investment and increase the risk
premium.” Both banks have cut their 2018 growth forecasts for Russia:
Goldman Sachs to 2 percent from 3.3 percent and Morgan Stanley to 1.8
percent from 2.3 percent.
Russia’s economic output grew just 1.3 percent in the first quarter of 2018,
compared with the year-earlier quarter. The Bloomberg consensus forecast is
for gross capital formation -- investment minus asset disposals -- to fall
to 3.2 percent this year from 7.5 percent in 2017. If the government cares
most about the economy, this isn’t a great time to tell investors they could
be prosecuted for applying Western sanctions. So Putin’s response to the
anti-sanctions bill is a test of whether his priorities will shift toward
the economy during his fourth term in power.
The signs are that the priorities will be the same as in the past six years,
however. The new cabinet, which Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev is in the
process of forming, looks a lot like the old one. “System liberals” hoped
former Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin would get a senior post in the
government or on Putin’s staff. Instead, he has accepted an offer to head
the Accounting Chamber, a body meant to ensure budget compliance and that is
peripheral to economic policy making. On Tuesday, Putin attended the
inauguration of a new bridge linking the Russian mainland to Crimea,
continuing to demonstrate his commitment to the annexed peninsula’s
integration into Russia.
Abadi and Sadr:
The path towards an Iraqi national cabinet
Hassan Al Mustafa/Al Arabiya/May 20/18
The Sairoon Alliance, led by Sayyid Moqtada al-Sadr, won the largest share
of seats in the recent parliamentary elections in Iraq. Although he did not
win an absolute majority, his alliance with the communists and other
nationalist allies gave him ascendance over many of his rivals and
competitors.
There are still chances that current Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi
will be appointed prime minister again in alliance with Sairoon. However,
observers had expected that his list — the Victory Alliance — would achieve
better results and be the frontrunner in the elections and not among the
first three winners.
The Fatah Alliance — which includes Hadi al-Amiri and represents the Popular
Mobilization and those allied with it, specifically parties which support
Iran’s policy — have gained a balanced presence in the parliament.
Therefore, they constitute a political power that also has military presence
on the ground and popularity among Iraqis. Only the Sadrist Movement
competes with them in this popularity.
Popularly speaking, the competition between Sairoon and the Fatah Alliance
will be fierce as despite the difference between the two movements, the
disparate loyalties and mentalities which seem to grow even more distant,
both movements rely on mobilizing the public because their power lies on the
wide base in various cities, whose residents have middle to low incomes, and
a very small category of the Iraqi elite which is a percentage that
represents nothing compared to the two movements’ size.
Although political and cultural differences may lead to disharmony between
Iraqi parties, they can create balance leading to mutual concessions
Haidar Abadi, thanks to his previous political experience with the Dawa
Party and his experience as prime minister, has a very good practical and
diplomatic experience that’s accompanied with a group of experienced aides.
He thus represents the option of the political and technocratic category as
well as of the educated category, much more than ordinary Iraqi individuals
do.
Although these political and cultural differences may lead to disharmony
between the leading parties, they can actually create some sort of balance
that eventually leads to mutual concessions between the different movements,
particularly the Sadrist Movement and Abadi’s alliance. This way, there will
be an agreement on forming national unity and not a partisan government and
that works on making the Iraqi decision making limited to local parties,
seeks to be independent from foreign parties and keeps away from Iran’s
domination or any other foreign domination.
The independence of the Iraqi decision, establishing good relations with
surrounding Arab countries, specifically Saudi Arabia and Gulf countries,
fighting financial and administrative corruption, improving Iraqi’s
livelihood and combating terrorism are the points of convergence between
Sairoon Alliance and the Victory Alliance. Thinking in a strategic way
that’s not tense or minority-related will help both alliances form a cabinet
that enjoys popular support and represents experienced political
competencies. This is what Iraq needs and not militant mentalities and
violence.
Santa Fe, Texas: Another ‘terrorist’ school shooting
Walid Jawad/Al Arabiya/May 20/18
The troubling thing about the latest school shooting is that it evoked
minimal emotions; no horror, no rage. The Santa Fe high school shooting on
Friday claimed 10 lives, and another 10 injured including a resource officer
(the armed police officer assigned to the school), who was charged with the
safety of the school. It's easy to make the case against the NRA mantra:
“the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun.”
Although the argument came to mind, it was not the most dominant thought. I
wondered why is it that no one calls the perpetrators of these atrocities
terrorists?
It would be a different issue altogether if the shooter had been of Arabic
origins or of Muslim persuasion. Similarly if that person had an
Arabic/Islamic sounding name or was off-white on the brownish color
spectrum. Inevitably, we would notice news channels move from discussing
mental health issues and gun control to more sinister angles of homegrown-terrorist,
lone-wolves, and Islamic Jihad.
When and if a school shooting would be carried out by a “brown kid” it would
be a different national discussion. Immigration and border security would
come to the fore. Perhaps assimilation and loyalty to foreign entities will
become euphemisms for Islamophobic speech. I doubt most TV talking-heads
will have the presence of mind to be politically correct. After all
Islamophobia doesn’t appear to be a cardinal sin in this post 9-11 world.
Subconscious racism will be legitimized in the wake of such incident. We, as
the “guilty” group, should not become indignant for the sweeping judgment.
Instead of becoming defensive we should make sure to condemn these violent
acts equating it to other school shootings. If one mass killing is a
terrorists act, then all other incidents should be called terrorist acts,
regardless of the ethnicity and beliefs of the perpetrator.
Islam was synonymous with terrorism post 9-11, when the Muslim world
abdicated to Al-Qaeda criminals confusing the messenger for the purity of
the Islamic message. It was a confusing time. The Muslim world bought into a
narrative of victimhood where they were on the losing end in the perceived
clash of civilizations of that period. Until the Muslim world claimed back
their religion from its hijackers, Islam was the enemy of peace. Ironically
when the word Islam is derived from the root word peace.
Terrorism: A judgment
Five hours into the news coverage, it dawned on Harris Faulkner, the Fox
News anchor, that acts of violence in schools should be labeled by what they
cause, terror. Surprisingly a couple of experts agreed with the
classification.
Terror in its simplest definition is extreme fear. And in our prevailing
narrative, is to instil fear in a community through anticipated random acts
of mass violence. Nothing surprising there. School shootings have instilled
fear in the heart and minds of American parents and students. Active
shooter, lockdown, and shelter-in-place drills are common in most schools.
Yet, the uncertainty of when, where, and how is frightening. The futility of
these exercises deepens that sense of terror.
The average school shooting lasts 12.5 minutes, according to Homeland
Security statistic. Casualties in this year's 22 school shootings were
random targets of opportunity. In the last five years of school shootings,
about 450 were shot of which 150 lost their lives. We don’t know much about
why they do it. Some of the shooter are traumatized, psychopaths, or
psychotic kids according to Peter Langman, the author of the book “Why Kids
Kill.” Excluding mental disorders, I believe lack of resilience, the
inability to overcome difficulties, is a big factor.
The recurrence of school shooting suggests a generation wide lack of
toughness. Parents are to blame. Shielding kids from reality and babying
them when they are challenged contributes to the problem. We know that these
kids are capable and smart because they plot out their school shootings with
meticulous detail. They overcome challenges and face uncertainty as they
move into the execution phase of their sinister plan. Unfortunately, they’re
unable to draw on that resiliency on daily basis under constant low-level
adversity. When shooters reach the tipping point due to a slow but long
build up, we get to discuss mental health and gun control around the clock
on all news channels.
Kids and terrorism
The US had 15 juveniles brought to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, over the years. At
the time of their arrest, some were as young as 14 (even a report of 13 year
olds were arrested on the battlefields and detained in country). Couldn’t we
explain their action in the same way we explain school shooters’, a result
of trauma, psychopathy, or psychosis? I believe those explanations are not
exclusive to school shooter. But there are other explanations, which are
exclusive to battlefield youth. Some of them are recruited by virtue of
their guardian’s decision to join the fight, or as an option to escape a
worse reality (such as those orphaned by the violence they are embroiled
in). There is no justification for dubbing a 13 year old as a terrorist.
Teenagers can be manipulated to advance a terrorist organization’s political
goals, but the groups strategic goals has little bearing on what drives the
kids. Long-term goal of the fight is irrelevant in an environment focused on
daily tactics, survival among violent adults, and focus on avoiding death on
the battlefield. A far cry from the reality of School aged killers here in
the the States. In this environment, teenagers seem to be inspired by other
school shootings, plot to avoid others mistakes, and one up the latest
massacre. The difference between the two youths is glaring. The duration of
violent acts and frequency on the battlefield is long-term vs the very short
duration of shoot-em up at schools. Once in motion, the battlefield kids are
locked in risking their lives if they were to change their minds vs. school
shooters who can abort their plans right up to the moment of brandish their
weapons. Battlefield kids are led to believe they are committing violent
acts in the name of righteousness while school shooting is selfish; a cry
for help at best and sadistic pain inflecting rebelion at worst. Neither is
acceptable. It is incumbent upon us, the adult, to understand the
circumstances, which lead to such tragic ends. If both teenagers are
terrorist. We must wonder if this classification is adequate. Describing all
of these kids as terrorist is to expose this classification for what it
really is, a catch all for any random violent act against a group.
Because we don't understand what motivates seemingly normal school kids to
commit such atrocities, we are bound to focus on the tools used in their
attacks. We keep talking about guns and the second amendment rights (It is
ludicrous to discuss the second amendment, as it is not under threat on any
level). As for access to guns, a student who is hell-bent on carrying out a
school massacre will find a way to inflict the most damage. Let us be
realistic, there is no control on pipe bombs or pressure cooker conversion
to bombs and yet they are incorporated in some attacks. We can devise the
most stringent controls over guns, yet school massacres will not end.
America will need to reexamine how it perceives the role of youth in
society, how it treats them, how it educates them. Child protection must be
redefined to protect children from self-destructive tendencies. Child
rearing will need a revolutionary approach that is reflective of the
technologically advanced world we live in. There are conditions to be met;
we must satisfy children basic needs of nourishment, shelter, and safety as
a base from which we can build on. The second layer of this dichotomy
requires cultivating a sense of purpose. Adults must assign appropriate
responsibilities, to foster a sense of agency. Consequences for their
actions should be an exercise in self-reflection at home and school. Society
will need to devise new opportunities for children to be engaged in their
communities.
Education needs to incorporate a much bigger out of the classroom component.
We must reimagine the classroom. We must redesign schools to be open, not
turn its walls to fortresses and the classrooms to panic rooms. Schools must
become part of the community instead of exclusionary to it. Schools should
no longer be daycare drop off points where parents outsource the
responsibility of raising their kids to educators. If we are successful, our
youth will possess a wider perspective allowing them to understand their
role within society. Only then, school shootings will be part of a dark
period in America’s history, and our children will become resilient and will
lead us to the future we are hoping for them to embody.
Secularism: Differences among academics,
radicals and Orientalists
Fahad Suleiman Shoqiran/Al Arabiya/May 20/18
No concept has been distorted by Arabs and Muslims as much as secularism. It
all began with the poor translation of the term and which did not end with
explaining what it means. The explanation “the principle of separation of
the state from religious institutions” remained common even among academics
and intellectuals. However, secularism is more than that and carries several
interpretations, dimensions, and multiple implementations. Thus, we cannot
confine ourselves to just one political model as a basis to judge the
difference between true and false secularism.
The aim of the concept is to establish a more earthly atmosphere, to keep
religion impartial and spare it from the conflicts between the masses or
between different individuals in the one state. Secularism is a concept that
can be refined, built, expressed and repeated like any other political
concept. All the tense and quick interpretations of secularism were met with
outrage by scholars and thinkers alike, as was the case when Abdul Rahman
Badawi attacked Fuad Zakaria and said he was advocating secularization.
Another example is Mohammed al-Jabri who criticized secularism, thus
provoking Tarabishi who compared him to Yusuf Qaradawi who said in a
television program: “I am amazed that secularists have not been subjected to
the punishment for apostasy.” In any way, al-Jabri's understanding of
secularism was one of his weakest political analyses he ever made.
Islam and secularism
In his book Heresies, specifically in the chapter entitled “The seeds of
secularism in Islam,” George Tarabishi debated Islamic arguments as well as
academic and orientalist ones. He mentioned Bernard Lewis who said that
Christianity separated the church from the state but Islam did not and it’s
thus not possible for Islamic societies to develop within a typical
analysis. This strengthened the idea that secularism is impossible in
Islamic countries. In this sense, Tarabishi comments: “There are
orientalists and specialists in Islamic studies, who are sustained by local
professionals to defend Islam, who confirm with outmost certainty that Islam
did not know the principle of separation between religion and politics, as
Christianity did in the differentiation between the spiritual and temporal
powers between the popes and the tsars, or the popes and the emperors during
the reigns of the sacred Roman, Byzantine and Germanic empires and then
between the popes and the kings until modernity came along and the
nationalist state was established.”But is it possible for Tarabishi to
present an example of a “secularization” tendency in Islamic history?
Tarabishi says: “When foreigners whether Turks, Daylamites and Seljuks began
controlling the state around the third century AH onwards, the history of
Islam went through the same stages as that of Christianity; starting from
the distribution of power between the popes and emperors or between the
popes and the kings. A Buyid Prince or a Seljuk Sultan emerged alongside the
Abbasid caliph and seized the actual political power from him, leaving him
with nothing but a mere symbolic religious authority. They controlled him
(the caliph) to a great extent, much more than emperors controlled popes, by
taking his throne, killing him or plucking out his eyes if necessary for
entertainment purposes as was the case with the caliphs Al-Qahir, Al-Muttaqi
and Al-Mustakfi.”Therefore, this refutes Islamic thinkers’ and some clerics’
and orientalists’ argument pertaining to the secular model that’s
characterized with certain separations between the religious institution,
the politics and reality. There is thus no point of repeating that naïve
saying that it’s impossible to imagine the secularization of a Muslim
society, or an entire country with a Muslim majority.
Conceptual misunderstanding
In his book The Impossible State, Wael Hallaq makes the same argument
against those who claim that it is impossible to have models that separate
between authorities or between the functions of the state. He says: “The
famous Lebanese Orientalist Émile Tyan argued, and his argument enjoyed
authority for many decades, that one ‘consequence of the concept of
delegation was the complete lack of separation between the judicial and
executive powers.’ This view is ill informed and entirely erroneous.”
According Hallaq, Tyan is wrong due to several factors such as “the
mitigating executive-judicial collusion, namely the paradigmatic moral force
of the Sharia, which, as a rule, compelled judges and rulers alike to
respect judicial independence.” Hallaq adds: “Put differently, judicial
independence was integral to culture.”
At the end, the goal is to put an end to confusion that has lasted for over
a century, since interpretations, results and patterns of secularism and
Muslim societies’ relations with it are still being discussed. This
confusion is due to not discussing the history of the concept and the
history of states. This is in addition to issues which justify this
sensitivity from the concept including ideological ones and the false claims
of some tyrannical states that they follow a secular regime, as in the case
of the Baathist regimes in Iraq and Syria.
The bet now is on the true understanding of the concept in order to find a
way to explain it and to reassure societies about it.
How the Iraq war undermined the Responsibility
to Protect doctrine
Kerry Boyd Anderson/Arab News/May 20/2018
In an interview for Prospect Magazine’s June issue, Emily Thornberry, the
British shadow foreign secretary, argued that “the doctrine of
Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) is on life support, and that the aftermath
of the 2011 military action in Libya badly damaged the concept of R2P.
Certainly, Libya’s instability and the international community’s failure to
protect civilians in the Syrian civil war have undermined those who advocate
for humanitarian interventions, including through R2P. Before these two
crises, however, the 2003 invasion of Iraq and subsequent years of war and
instability crippled R2P just when it gained international approval.
Humanitarian intervention encompasses a broad set of ideas about what
countries and the international community should do to support people
suffering from violence, natural disaster and other humanitarian concerns.
While R2P falls under that general umbrella, it is a specific doctrine
adopted unanimously by the UN in 2005. R2P represents an effort to address
the gap between respect for state sovereignty and respect for the most
fundamental rights of people — a gap that was especially clear after the
genocides and wars in the Balkans and Rwanda in the 1990s.
R2P posits that state sovereignty comes with responsibilities toward the
people that a government governs. When a government is unable to fulfill its
responsibility to provide basic protections to its people — or when a
government perpetrates specific crimes against people under its care — then
other states have a responsibility to step in. R2P applies to four very
specific situations with particular meanings under international law:
“Genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity,”
according to the UN.
The George W. Bush administration did not explicitly cite R2P as a
justification for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Bush’s foreign policy team
primarily focused on concerns about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and
alleged links to terrorism. However, the administration also argued that
Saddam Hussein’s brutal treatment of many Iraqis was one reason to overthrow
him, as well as promoting democracy.
It is unlikely that the Bush administration’s humanitarian or
democratization arguments in 2003 would meet the standards set out by R2P.
Nonetheless, the Iraq war set a precedent for large-scale military action
based partly on humanitarian justifications.
The results — brutal war, many thousands of Iraqi deaths, lengthy and costly
US military involvement, conditions that fostered the rise of Daesh and
general instability — made leaders and publics around the world skeptical of
arguments in favor of military interventions on humanitarian grounds.
The Iraq war and its aftermath dealt two significant blows to the R2P
doctrine, just as it had potential to gain traction. The first was that the
Iraq war provided an easy excuse to those who never liked R2P — especially
the concept that sovereignty came with certain responsibilities to a
government’s people.
As Iraq’s recent elections suggest, the history of the aftermath of the Iraq
war is still being written. However, many world leaders took the lesson to
mean that they should avoid large-scale humanitarian interventions,
especially those involving military action
Russia in particular has expressed skepticism about R2P, which it sees as a
potential threat to its interests and its views of sovereignty. Russia also
sees R2P through the lens of US and European attempts to impose Western
values on the rest of the world. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has
repeatedly pointed to the invasion of Iraq as an example of why Washington
should not consider military action in Syria.
A related problem for R2P is that the doctrine requires UN Security Council
approval for military action, and the council’s paralysis is an obstacle.
Multiple times, Russia and China have vetoed actions that they see as
infringing on sovereignty, even for the sake of stopping the type of
extreme, large-scale violence that R2P is designed to halt. An even more
significant consequence was that the Iraq war strongly shaped the foreign
policy choices of US President Barack Obama. While he reluctantly intervened
in Libya with a multilateral coalition, he decided against significant
military involvement in Syria to protect civilians from the Assad regime,
even though the Syrian conflict clearly meets the R2P conditions.
Obama’s Ambassador to the UN Samantha Powers was a key advocate of the R2P
principle, and some other members of his foreign policy team, including
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, advocated for stronger intervention in
Syria. Obama overruled them for several reasons, including his views of the
lessons of Iraq. He was clear that the experience of the Iraq war shaped his
thinking on Syria, telling The Atlantic magazine in 2016 that “any
thoughtful president would hesitate about making a renewed commitment in the
exact same region of the world with some of the exact same dynamics and the
same probability of an unsatisfactory outcome.” The hangover from the Iraq
war was also a major factor in the 2013 UK vote against taking military
action in Syria in response to President Bashar Assad’s use of chemical
weapons, which in turn was one reason why Obama backed off from threats
after Assad first used them. As Iraq’s recent elections suggest, the history
of the aftermath of the Iraq war is still being written. However, many world
leaders took the lesson to mean that they should avoid large-scale
humanitarian interventions, especially those involving military action.
While clearly it is important to learn the many lessons of the ill-conceived
2003 Bush decisions on Iraq, the Iraq war’s role in undermining the primary
doctrine available for interventions to stop genocide, war crimes, ethnic
cleansing and crimes against humanity adds to the other tragic consequences
of the conflict. *Kerry Boyd Anderson is a writer and political risk
consultant with more than 14 years’ experience as a professional analyst of
international security issues and Middle East political and business risk.
Twitter: @KBAresearch
Iran's
Leaders at War with Western Civilization/Why is the West Putting Up with It?
Giulio Meotti/Gatestone Institute/May 20/18
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12293/iran-western-civilization
The archipelago of political Islam in Europe, from Tariq Ramadan to the
Muslim Brotherhood, revolves around the orbit of the Qatar-Iran axis.
Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood openly sided with Khomeini's revolutionaries as
they overthrew the Shah, and now threatens Saudi Arabia and the UAE and
others in the region.
After the revolution, for the first time, the Iranians declared war on their
own cultural life: theaters were closed, concerts were banned, entertainers
fled the country, cinemas were confiscated, broadcasting was forbidden.
Will Europe – the cradle of Western culture and civilization – open its eyes
and stop regularly taking the side of the Iran's tyrannical ayatollahs?
The United States just withdrew from the Iranian nuclear deal. The move is
fully justified not only on the grounds security, but primarily because
Iran's Iranian Khomeinist revolution is a deadly and propulsive ideology
that the West cannot allow to become a nuclearized one.
At the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, everything changed when Said
and Sharif Kouachi murdered 11 people in its Paris office. Among the texts
recovered on the Kouachi brothers' laptop was the Iranian call for death
against the novelist Salman Rushdie, calling it "fully justified". The
killers were inspired by Ayatollah Khomeini's deadly edict against Rushdie.
The bloodbath at Charlie Hebdo is one of the poisoned fruits of the Islamic
Republic. The Iranian ayatollahs fear the allure of Western culture. That is
why, since 1979, they are at war with it.
The leader of Iran's Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini,
pictured in 1979.
Never, before Ayatollah Khomeini's rise to power, was a writer forced to
live under the threat of deliberate murder, with a bounty on his head, for
criticizing Islam. Before the Iranian Revolution, no Arab was marked for
death. Since Khomeini, murdering literary dissidents has become a routine:
the Algerian writer Tahar Djaout, the Egyptian intellectual Farag Foda,
Turkish writers murdered in Sivas, and recently butchered bloggers from
Bangladesh. The fatwa against Rushdie was one of Iran's most successful
attacks on Western civilization and efforts to intimidate the West.
U.S. flag-burning and chanting "Death to America" became common in the
Middle East only after the Iranian takeover of the US embassy in Teheran.
When Donald Trump pulled the US out of the nuclear deal, Iranian MPs in
their Parliament burned the American flag. In the last few months, Iranian
girls who took off their veil were arrested and beaten. It was Iran that
made chador a symbol of political Islam. A woman wrapped in a black chador,
the most severe form of hijab, has become one of the most visible images of
the Islamic Republic.
Women never used to be covered in Egypt, Syria Afghanistan, Turkey, the
Maghreb. Khomeini changed all that; he called it the veil "a flag of the
revolution". It is not a coincidence that 1989 was not only the year of
Rushdie's fatwa, but also when in France started the Islamic scarf
controversy. A school principal told three Muslim teenagers that they could
not attend high school in Creil due to the France's Contitutional commitment
to secularism. The Islamic community started to fight for the right to veil
their girls at schools. "We will keep it until we die", the Islamic
fundamentalists in France chanted.
The hijab was first distributed by the Iranian embassy in Algiers. In
Tunisia, the secular government was excommunicated by the Iranian
fundamentalists after 1981, when the Tunisian government issued a circular
prohibiting the use of a hijab in schools and public offices. In recent
years, Iran has also managed to impose the hijab on a large number of
European leaders and ministers visiting the country, thereby placing them in
a humiliating state of cultural and symbolic subjugation.
The Iranian ayatollahs were the first formally to persecute the Christian
populations in the Middle East. Today, Iran is on list of Open Doors' ten
worst countries for Christians. The idea of attacking Jewish communities
around the world is also an Iranian invention: in 1992 and 1994, the Jewish
community and the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires were blown up. Until
Iran's Revolution, no country had promoted a false Holocaust denial.
The archipelago of political Islam in Europe, from Tariq Ramadan to the
Muslim Brotherhood, revolves around the orbit of the Qatar-Iran axis. The
Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood openly sided with Khomeini's revolutionaries as
they overthrew the Shah, and now threatens Saudi Arabia and the UAE and
others in the region.
In the early years of the Revolution, a ferocious puritanism hit the nation.
Thousands of "prostitutes", drug addicts and homosexuals were executed. In
public places, revolutionaries attacked people who did not respect the
stringent new codes of dress and behavior. Then, there were no Taliban, no
ISIS, no Boko Haram. Since the Iranian Revolution, the idea of including
sharia in national laws has spread throughout the Islamic world. After the
revolution, for the first time, the Iranians declared war on their own
cultural life: theaters were closed, concerts were banned, entertainers fled
the country, cinemas were confiscated, broadcasting was forbidden.
The idea of using children as human bombs originated in was also advanced by
Iran. As the German scholar Matthias Küntzel wrote, "Khomeini was the first
to develop a full-blown death cult". During the Iran-Iraq war, the Ayatollah
Khomeini imported thousands of plastic keys from Taiwan. The ayatollah sent
these Iranian children through the Iraqi minefields in the direction of the
enemy, to open a gap with their bodies. Before each mission, Iranian
children were given a key to hang around their neck; they were told it would
open the doors to paradise.
Since then, the baby suicide bombers made their appearance in Gaza, Iraq,
Syria, Nigeria and Afghanistan.
The fatwas against "blasphemous" writers, the veiling of women, the attacks
against Jews worldwide, the persecution of Christians, the abuse of
children, the imposition of Islamic law... All these have been the poisoned
fruits of Khomeini's revolution and the most direct challenges to the
central features of the Western civilization. Will Europe – the cradle of
Western culture and civilization – open its eyes and stop regularly taking
the side of the Iran's tyrannical ayatollahs?
*Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and
author.
© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here
do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone
Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be
reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of
Gatestone Institute.
Trump ME peace plan: Half West Bank for Palestinians,
Abu Dis as capital
خطة ترامب للصراع العربي الإسرائيلي: نصف الضفة الغربية للفلسطينيين ومنطقة أبو ديس
في القدس عاصمتهم
DEBKAfile/May 20, 2018
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/64806/debkafile-trump-me-peace-plan-half-west-bank-for-palestinians-abu-dis-as-capital-%d8%ae%d8%b7%d8%a9-%d8%aa%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%85%d8%a8-%d9%84%d9%84%d8%b5%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%b9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b9%d8%b1%d8%a8/
President Donald Trump sees his peace plan as a springboard for shaping an
Israel-Arab track – even if spurned by the Palestinians at first. He is
preparing for the second time to unveil the all-but complete peace plan in
mid-June i.e., after the month of Ramadan, subject to the situation in the
region, five administration officials informed US media on Friday, May 18. His
son-in-law and senior advise Jared Kushner and Jason Greenblatt, his special
adviser for international negotiations, had originally been instructed to tie up
the last ends in time for its launch with the US embassy dedication in Jerusalem
on May 14. The spadework was in hand. The president had discussed the peace
plan’s content with three Arab leaders, Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman,
UAE emir Sheikh Muhammad bin Zayed, the Qatari ruler Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani,
Egyptian President Abdel-Fatteh El-Sisi, as well as thoroughly briefing Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan was invited to
come aboard, but he rebuffed the offer – and that was even before he generated a
crisis with Israel for its deadly confrontation with Hamas in Gaza.
Some of the elements incorporated in the Trump peace plan were revealed by DEBKA
Weekly 798 on April 27
The plan will be released on the date scheduled by Washington, regardless of a
boycott by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian
leadership.
The Arab world is expected to publicly nix the blueprint while keeping it afloat
by offering to make the acceptable elements the basis for further discussions
for an eventual peace deal between the Palestinians and Israel.
In search of a measure of Palestinian assent, the White House, Egypt and Gulf
nations agreed to headhunt Palestinian figures living outside the PA domain, who
hold different views from the Ramallah elite, and would be willing to underwrite
the plan. Five eminent Palestinians have been found as possible candidates,
including Abbas’ arch-foe Muhammed Dahlan. Feelers are still ongoing.
The Israeli prime minister will issue a cautious statement proposing that the
Trump plan be the springboard for immediate negotiations with Arab governments
on certain mutually acceptable points. Administration emissaries have
buttonholed a wide range of Israeli political leaders, both in the government
coalition and on opposition benches, who have agreed to look with favor on the
Trump plan and not obstruct it.
Kushner and Greenblatt are assigned exclusively with the task of shepherding the
peace plan from one stage to the next.
The Trump plan is not a definitive document. It is designed to generate momentum
for key Arab governments, notably the three Gulf emirates and Egypt, to sit down
with the US and Israel and start the ball rolling for peace talks. Since this
will be a long process, the Palestinians will have a chance to jump in at some
point. At all events, the Arab and Israeli governments are expected to establish
a mechanism for airing common issues that will be open to co-optiong
Palestinians.
Sources who have had access to the text told DEBKAfile that it addresses the
subjects at issue in detail, including Jerusalem. They disclosed the following
nine elements:
A Palestinian state will be established with limited sovereignty across about
half of the West Bank and all the Gaza Strip.
Israel will retain security responsibility for most of the West Bank and the
border crossings.
The Jordan Valley will remain under Israel sovereignty and military control.
.The Arab neighborhoods of East Jerusalem will pass to the Palestinian state,
excepting the Old City, which will be part of Israeli Jerusalem.
Abu Dis east of Jerusalem is the proposed capital of Palestine.
Palestine and Jordan will share religious jurisdiction over the city’s mosques.
Gaza will be integrated in the new Palestinian state provided Hamas agrees to
disarm.
There is no provision in the plan for the Palestinian refugees’ “right of
return” – but a compensation mechanism will be established and managed by the
international community.
The Trump plan mandates Israel’s recognition as the homeland of the Jewish
people, and Palestine with limited sovereignty as the Palestinian homeland.