LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
October 23/17
Compiled &
Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias/english.october23.17.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations
Other seeds fell on good soil and brought forth grain,
some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty. Let anyone with ears listen
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 13/01-09/:"That same day
Jesus went out of the house and sat beside the lake. Such great crowds gathered
around him that he got into a boat and sat there, while the whole crowd stood on
the beach. And he told them many things in parables, saying: ‘Listen! A sower
went out to sow. And as he sowed, some seeds fell on the path, and the birds
came and ate them up. Other seeds fell on rocky ground, where they did not have
much soil, and they sprang up quickly, since they had no depth of soil. But when
the sun rose, they were scorched; and since they had no root, they withered
away. Other seeds fell among thorns, and the thorns grew up and choked them.
Other seeds fell on good soil and brought forth grain, some a hundredfold, some
sixty, some thirty. Let anyone with ears listen!’"
Do not be deceived! Fornicators, idolaters,
adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites,thieves, the greedy, drunkards,
revilers, robbers none of these will inherit the kingdom of God.
First Letter to the Corinthians 06/01-11/:"When any of you has a grievance
against another, do you dare to take it to court before the unrighteous, instead
of taking it before the saints? Do you not know that the saints will judge the
world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try
trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels to say nothing of
ordinary matters? If you have ordinary cases, then, do you appoint as judges
those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be
that there is no one among you wise enough to decide between one believer and
another, but a believer goes to court against a believer and before unbelievers
at that? In fact, to have lawsuits at all with one another is already a defeat
for you. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be defrauded? But you
yourselves wrong and defraud and believers at that. Do you not know that
wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! Fornicators,
idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites, thieves, the greedy,
drunkards, revilers, robbers none of these will inherit the kingdom of God. And
this is what some of you used to be. But you were washed, you were sanctified,
you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our
God.".
Question: "Why do people reject Jesus as their Savior?"
GotQuestions.org?/Answer: The decision to accept or reject Jesus as Savior is
the ultimate life decision. Why do many people choose to reject Jesus as Savior?
There are perhaps as many different reasons for rejecting Christ as there are
people who reject Him, but the following four reasons can serve as general
categories:
1) Some people do not think they need a savior. These people consider themselves
to be “basically good” and do not realize that they, like all people, are
sinners who cannot come to God on their own terms. But Jesus said, “I am the
way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me”
(John 14:6). Those who reject Christ will not be able to stand before God and
successfully plead their own case on their own merits.
2) The fear of social rejection or persecution deters some people from receiving
Christ as Savior. The unbelievers in John 12:42-43 would not confess Christ
because they were more concerned with their status among their peers than doing
God’s will. These were the Pharisees whose love of position and the esteem of
others blinded them, “for they loved the approval of men rather than the
approval of God.”
3) For some people, the things that the present world has to offer are more
appealing than eternal things. We read the story of such a man in Matthew
19:16-23. This man was not willing to lose his earthly possessions in order to
gain an eternal relationship with Jesus (see also 2 Corinthians 4:16-18).
4) Many people are simply resisting the Holy Spirit’s attempts to draw them to
faith in Christ. Stephen, a leader in the early church, told those who were
about to murder him, “You stiff-necked people, with uncircumcised hearts and
ears! You are just like your fathers: You always resist the Holy Spirit!” (Acts
7:51). The apostle Paul made a similar statement to a group of gospel rejecters
in Acts 28:23-27.
Whatever the reasons why people reject Jesus Christ, their rejection has
disastrous eternal consequences. “There is no other name under heaven given to
men by which we must be saved” than the name of Jesus (Acts 4:12), and those who
reject Him, for whatever reason, face an eternity in the “outer darkness” of
hell where there will be “weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Matthew 25:30).
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources
published on October 22-23/17
Abandoning our Kurdish allies is a win for our Iranian enemies/Michael Pregent/Fox
News/October 22/17
The Case for Assyrian Independence/Oasis of Peace in the Middle East/Amir
George//Gatestone Institute/October 22/17
Czech Donald Trump" Wins Landslide Victory/"I am ready to fight for our national
interests./Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/October 22/17
The Iran Deal: The Dog's Dinner Obama Dished Out/Amir Taheri/Gatestone
Institute/October 22/2017
Trump Excludes Iraq’s Popular Mobilization from his Iran Strategy/Raghida
Dergham/October 22/2017
Dangers of refusing to link the Iran Deal to Tehran’s behavior/Eyad Abu Shakra/Al
Arabiya/October 22/17
Titles For Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on
October 22-23/17
Aoun more open to consensus: Machnouk
Australian Governor and his wife start visit to Lebanon
LF Reportedly Mulling Resignation from Government
LF, Kataeb Slam Attempt to Torch Their Offices in Akkar
Geagea: Ruling against Chartouni a Conviction against March 8 Camp
Qassem: Justifications Do Not Absolve Israeli Collaborators
Mashnouq Hails Aoun, Says STL Rulings within 2 Years
Rahi from Salt Lake City: Muslims, Christians should stay in Levant so it does
not become a land for terrorists
Riachi: If Lebanese Forces' presence in government becomes unnecessary, we shall
resign
Army: Three enemy gunboats violate territorial waters over the weekend
Governor of Australia and his wife arrive in Beirut on an official visit
Khouri for regulating economic relation between Lebanon and displaced Syrians
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports
And News published on October 22-23/17
Soleimani Gave Military ‘Guidance’ from Kirkuk Prior to Iraqi Offensive
In Saudi, Tillerson Demands Iranian Militias Leave Iraq
Tillerson Attends Landmark Talks between Saudi, Iraqi Leaders
Iraq's Abadi: 'Hero' who Tackled Mission Impossible
Gunman Holds Hostages at UK Bowling Alley
Russian Opposition Chief Navalny Says Released from Jail
Bahrain Sends Civilian 'Cell' to Military Court
U.S.-Backed Forces Seize Major Syria Oilfield
Russia Likens U.S. Coalition Bombing of Raqa to WWII Dresden
Trump Says End of IS Caliphate 'in Sight' after Raqa's Fall
Erdogan, Putin Discuss Turkish Deployment in Syria’s Idlib
Qatar-Hamas Ties Weakening as Israel Warns Movement Will Pay for its Iran Ties
Germany 'Approves' Controversial Israel Submarine Deal- Israeli Sources
After Backlash, WHO Reconsidering Appointing Mugabe as Goodwill Ambassador
Barzani may be summoned by Iraq’s judiciary, parliamentary sources say
US Treasury Secretary to visit Middle East over Iran threats
Canada calls for Mugabe WHO appointment to be rescinded without delay
Latest Lebanese Related News published on
October 22-23/17
Aoun more open to consensus: Machnouk
The Daily Star/October 22/17/BEIRUT: Interior
Minister Nouhad Machnouk said Sunday that President Michel Aoun has taken an
open approach to all parties and shown increased understanding of the country’s
constitutional mechanisms since his election.
“The settlement that brought General Aoun to Baabda was subject to minor tremors
that were overcome. Every passing day shows more and more that the President
recognizes all others and is committed to dealing with them politically and
accepting the differences of those who disagree with him,” Machnouk said during
a Future Movement event in Beirut. He added that Aoun is keen on political
consensus and that his actions thus far have been in compliance with his
constitutional powers. "We elected a president of the republic, we [sometimes]
disagree with him and this is our constitutional right, and every day I make
sure that [the settlement that brought him to power] has proven successful,”
Machnouk said. He highlighted recent governmental progress in a number of areas,
including the passage of a new electoral law, the formation of the
Socio-economic council and the endorsement a state budget, although he said he
had objected to half of the agreements. “[Prime Minister Saad] Hariri was
insistent, persistent and persevered in an unprecedented manner in order to
complete all these files," Machnouk said. However, Machnouk said Hariri’s
Cabinet was not able to complete their goal of distancing Lebanon from regional
conflicts.
“There has been a practical defect in this item, due to March 8 ministers
visiting Damascus and Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil meeting with Syrian Foreign
Minister Walid al-Moallem,” he said, adding that this had not affected “our
insistence on the return of displaced Syrians to safe areas in accordance with
international standards.” Responding to a question on the verdict sentencing the
killers of President-elect Bachir Gemayel to death on Friday, Machnouk said that
the court's decisions must be abided by. Gemayel was assassinated in a car bomb
attack in 1982.
In reference to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, charged with investigating the
2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, Machnouk said the
verdict would be expected in less than two years.
Australian Governor and his wife start visit to Lebanon
The Daily Star/October 22/17/BEIRUT: Australian Governor Sir Peter Cosgrove and
his wife Lady Lynn Cosgrove begins an official visit to Lebanon Sunday. He will
meet President Michel Aoun and senior Lebanese officials, according to a
statement from the Baabda palace. “His [Gov.] plane will arrive at Rafic Hariri
International Airport at 3 p.m,” it added, noting that “The official reception
will be held at the Baabda Palace on Monday at around 11 a.m. accompanied by his
wife, and will be greeted at by Aoun and first lady Nadia El Shami Aoun.” The
statement said that a meeting will be held between Aoun and Cosgrove, while
First Lady Nadia meets Lady Lynn in another hall. “After the official retreat,
the Lebanese and Australian delegations will join the talks, followed by a joint
press conference,” Baabda palace added, saying that “Gov. Cosgrove will sign the
register of honor after that.”
Afterwards, Mrs. Aoun and Lady Cosgrove will join President Aoun and Sir
Cosgrove in the presidential palace where Aoun holds lunch in honor of his guest
at 1pm, the statement mentions. Saying that “The visit also includes Gov.
meeting with Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Saad Hariri.
He will visit Commonwealth War Graves and Martyrs' Square to put two wreaths,
and a visit to the offices of the International Organization for Migration and
UNICEF.The Australian ambassador to Lebanon, Glen Miles, will hold a reception
Tuesday in honor of the governor and his wife who will leave Lebanon Wednesday
morning.
LF Reportedly
Mulling Resignation from Government
Naharnet/October 22/17/Amid growing
tensions between the Free Patriotic Movement and the Lebanese Forces inside and
outside the government, the LF is “inclined” to ask its ministers to “resign,” a
media report said. LF leader Samir Geagea, who is currently in Australia, has
told the LF ministers, “Prepare yourselves for resignation,” an LF source told
ad-Diyar newspaper in remarks published Sunday. “He has put the LF’s senior
officials in this picture in protest at the prevalent approach in running the
country’s affairs,” the source said. “We have tried to reform to no avail,” the
source added. Noting that LF deputy chief MP George Adwan did not express his
own opinions in his latest speech in Parliament but rather those of the LF’s
leadership, the LF source stressed that “the resignation of the LF’s ministers
is not a rumor or a story for political circulation but rather a serious
decision that will manifest itself within day, two weeks or perhaps when Dr.
Geagea returns from his Australia trip.” Ad-Diyar quoted informed political
sources as saying that the LF “has reservations over Prime Minister Saad
Hariri’s performance and his submission to the president in all issues.”“The LF
no longer sees any transparency in the government’s performance and it does not
believe that the state is inclined to put an end to shady deals and the waste of
public money,” the sources added. LF sources meanwhile lamented that “AMAL
Movement, Hizbullah, the Progressive Socialist Party, al-Mustaqbal and (MP
Suleiman) Franjieh are taking everything they want in the administrative
appointments, while the LF -- the presidential tenure’s partner -- is being
deprived of everything despite having three ministers in the Cabinet.”Christian
“appointments are confined to the FPM and they only get approved following a
meeting between the prime minister and Minister Jebran Bassil,” the sources
decried. The LF sources however reassured that there will be no return to the
pre-Maarab Agreement era between the LF and the FPM despite their different
governance mentalities and political disagreements.
LF, Kataeb Slam Attempt to Torch Their Offices in Akkar
Naharnet/October 22/17/The Lebanese Forces and the Kataeb Party condemned Sunday
an attempt to torch their offices in the northern Akkar district. “Masked and
unidentified individuals attacked the headquarters of our Akkar department in
the town of Miniara overnight Saturday, torching the LF flags that were hoisted
outside it,” said a statement issued by the LF’s Akkar dept. “These blatant
attempts have not and will not intimidate us, seeing as these are outdated
practices that belong to the (Syrian) tutelage era,” the department stressed.
And noting that “the verdict that has been issued in the case of the
assassination of President-elect Bashir Gemayel is a clear indication that there
will be no turning back,” the LF called on security forces to “arrest the
perpetrators and bring them to justice to hand them the severest penalties and
make them an example for anyone who tries to sow discord and threaten civil
peace.”Kataeb’s media department meanwhile said “the hand of treachery and
criminality tried to burn down Kataeb’s Akkar headquarters at the Miniara
intersection.”Openly linking the attack to the death verdicts that were issued
by the Judicial Council against Habib Chartouni and Nabil al-Alam in the case of
Gemayel’s assassination, Kataeb said the torching attempt is a “materialization
of the threats that were launched by groups that do not believe in Lebanon as a
final homeland for all its citizens.”The attack “confirms that the criminal
murderers are the same in the past and today,” Kataeb added, urging authorities
to “quickly arrest the culprits, prosecute them and hand them the harshest
penalties.” The party also urged its members and supporters to “show restraint,”
describing the torching bid as a “cheap attempt to drag Kataeb into reactions
that the perpetrators are seeking in order to push the country once again to the
law of the jungle.”Tensions have been running high in the country since Friday,
when Chartouni and Alam -- members of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party --
were sentenced to death in absentia. Chartouni has been on the run since he
escaped from the Roumieh Prison on October 13, 1990 while Alam reportedly died
of illness in Brazil in 2014. The latter’s death has not been officially
confirmed. Bashir Gemayel was a senior member of Kataeb and the founder and
commander of the Lebanese Forces militia during the early years of the civil
war. He was elected president on August 23, 1982 while the country was torn by
civil war and occupied by both Israel and Syria. At a press conference that
followed his arrest, Chartouni admitted that he killed Gemayel, caling him a
“traitor” and accusing him of “selling the country to Israel.” He said he was
given the explosives and the fancy long-range electronic detonator in West
Beirut’s Ras Beirut district by Nabil al-Alam, who was reportedly SSNP's
intelligence chief at the time.
Geagea: Ruling against Chartouni a Conviction against March 8 Camp
Naharnet/October 22/17/Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea said the death
sentence verdict against the assassins of president-elect Bashir Geamyel is a
ruling against the whole of the March 8 camp which “seeks violence and political
assassinations.”“The Judicial Council's ruling that sentenced Habib Chartouni
and Nabil al-Alam to death in the assassination of Gemayel is a ruling against
all of March 8,” said Geagea, as he accused the alliance of “seeking violence
and political assassinations.”“The ruling issued is not only for one person but
for all of March 8 because this person belongs to one of the parties of this
camp. This man's party has carried out the operation as mentioned in the minutes
of the investigation. He was definitely linked to one of the March 8 parties and
to the Syrian intelligence at that stage,” added Geagea. The LF leader pointed
out saying that March 8 resorts to political assassinations in order to each its
goals. “This provision confirms the fact that March 8 group pleads for political
assassination to reach its goals. We all know that there are members of a
political party of March 8 being prosecuted before the International Tribunal,”
added Geagea, in reference to Hizbullah members reportedly accused in the
assassination of former PM Rafik Hariri. On Friday, the Judicial Council,
Lebanon's highest state security court, sentenced Chartouni and al-Alam to death
in absentia in the case of the 1982 assassination of President-elect Bashir
Gemayel. The in absentia trial had kicked off on November 25, 2016. During that
session, the Judicial Council called on Chartouni -- who confessed to planting
the bomb before escaping prison -- to turn himself in. It also decided to launch
in absentia proceedings against the other suspect in the case, al-Alam, after
media reports said he had died of illness in Brazil in 2014. Gemayel was a
senior member of the Kataeb Party and the supreme commander of the Lebanese
Forces militia during the early years of the civil war. He was elected president
on August 23, 1982 while the country was torn by civil war and occupied by both
Israel and Syria. Gemayel was assassinated on September 14, 1982, along with 26
others, when a bomb exploded in Kataeb's headquarters in Ashrafieh.
Qassem: Justifications Do Not Absolve Israeli Collaborators
Naharnet/October 22/17/Hizbullah deputy chief Sheikh Naim Qassem stressed Sunday
that any attempt to “justify collaboration with the enemy in a certain era does
not absolve the collaborator.”“Israel was and will always be an enemy and anyone
who justifies collaboration with it can be called a collaborator in one way or
another,” Qassem said. Noting that some parties are trying to distribute
“patriotism certificates,” Hizbullah number two emphasized that “those who have
the right to offer patriotism certificates are the ones who resisted, liberated
the land… and managed to kick out the (Israeli) enemy.”Qassem’s remarks come
amid controversy in the country over the death sentences that have been issued
in absentia for Habib Chartouni and Nabil al-Alam over the 1982 assassination of
President-elect Bashir Gemayel. More than three decades after Gemayel was killed
in a powerful explosion in Beirut, the case still sharply divides Lebanese —
some see him as a national hero while others say he was an Israeli agent. The
assassination came at the height of the country's 15-year civil war and Israel's
invasion of Lebanon. Chartouni, a member of the Damascus-backed Syrian Social
Nationalist Party who has been on the run since escaping prison in 1990, was
found guilty of planting the bomb. Shortly after his arrest in 1982, Chartouni
had called Gemayel a “traitor” and accused him of “selling the country to
Israel.”
Mashnouq Hails Aoun, Says STL Rulings within 2 Years
Naharnet/October 22/17/Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq on Sunday lauded the
performance of President Michel Aoun while noting that the Special Tribunal for
Lebanon will issue its rulings in the murder of ex-PM Rafik Hariri within a
period not exceeding two years. “President Aoun’s stances greatly improved this
year in the direction of more openness towards all parties, understanding of all
constitutional mechanisms that are necessary for the country, and political
tolerance of opposing ideas,” Mashnouq said during a Mustaqbal Movement seminar.
“The settlement that led General Aoun to Baabda has suffered minor shocks that
we have managed to overcome,” Mashnouq added. He also pointed out that Aoun is
“very keen on political consensus and is abiding by the Constitution and the
laws.”“Had it not been for his support, Cabinet would not have been able to
settle a lot of files,” Mashnouq added. Separately, the minister said he expects
the U.N.-backed STL to issue verdicts in the Hariri case “withing a period not
exceeding two years.”The court has indicted five Hizbullah members with carrying
out the crime and is trying them in absentia. Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan
Nasrallah has vowed that the accused will never be arrested, dismissing the
tribunal as a U.S.-Israeli scheme.
Rahi from Salt Lake City: Muslims, Christians should stay
in Levant so it does not become a land for terrorists
Sun 22 Oct 2017/NNA - Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Bchara Boutros Rahi called on
all those living in the Levant from different religions to unite in order not to
allow terrorists to take control of their land. "We urge Muslims and Christians
to stay in the Middle East because we have lived together for 1300 years and
built moderation. If we leave the Middle East, it will become a land for
terrorists and a base that threatens world peace," Rahi said during a Mass
service at "Saint Laba" Church in Salt Lake City in the United States. Rahi also
called for distinguishing between terrorist organizations fighting in the name
of Islam and Islam itself. "You must know that most of the terrorist
organizations, such as Daesh and al-Qaeda, are outsiders to the Middle East, to
its culture and traditions. They have been trained, supported and used by
foreign countries to ignite wars in the Middle East," he added. Rahi concluded
by saying, "We had enough of wars and violence; it is time to build a just and
lasting peace. It is our people's right and the duty of the international
community."
Riachi: If Lebanese Forces' presence in government becomes
unnecessary, we shall resign
Sun 22 Oct 2017/NNA - Information Minister Melhem Riachi said Sunday that if the
Lebanese Forces Party's presence within the cabinet becomes unnecessary, then it
would resign. Riachi denied, however, any written resignation by LF's cabinet
ministers contrary to certain rumors, saying, "Nothing warrants our resignation
thus far, but if circumstances entail said resignation, it shall be written." In
an interview to "MTV" Channel Station, the Minister referred to LF's opposing
positions and reservations towards particular dossiers within cabinet, most
prominent of which is the electricity issue. "We do not accuse anyone nor do we
question anyone's credibility, but we have our approach to governance which we
exercise as need be," Riachi emphasized. Responding to a question regarding LF's
refusal to be part of the ministerial committee in charge of the electricity
tender, Riachi noted that there was "a discussion, not a debate" over the
matter. He added: "Prime Minister Hariri is an ally and we stood at length with
him, discussing the issue in depth. He was very understanding of the Lebanese
Forces' position and considered our opinion; otherwise, the electricity dossier
would not have been transferred to the tenders' department for further study."
"We were the spearhead in this matter," asserted Riachi. Over the Lebanese
Television board of directors' dossier, Riachi indicated that "this file has
been at the Cabinet's General Secretariat's disposal for more than three months,
be it the three proposed names to chair the board of directors according to the
institutional mechanism that I have adopted or the board members as proposed by
the Minister of Information." "The Prime Minister has promised to include this
dossier on the Council of Ministers' agenda for next Thursday," he added.
Responding to a question regarding the current mandate, Riachi said, "We have
achieved three main points in the election of President Michel Aoun: First, we
have overcome the vacuum period and the possibility of Lebanon's dissolution at
a dangerous time in the region. Second, we reconciled with the Christian
conscience by healing the wounds permanently, which is a historic achievement
that ensures a promising future for Lebanon. Third, was the strategic balance
between the Christian and Muslim partners in the country, which restored the
balance of power." Over the possibility of running in the parliamentary
elections, Riachi stated that he did not intend to be a candidate in said
elections. He noted, however, "If the Party leader decides that my candidacy is
within the interests of the Lebanese Forces, I will run."
Army: Three enemy gunboats violate territorial waters over
the weekend
Sun 22 Oct 2017/NNA - An Israeli enemy gunboat breached the Lebanese territorial
waters off Ras al-Naqoura between 1:35 a.m. and 1:50 a.m. on Sunday, firing a
flare bomb and several shots over said waters, an Army Command communiqué
indicated today. Another enemy gunboat also violated the territorial waters off
Ras al-Naqoura at 4:10 a.m. to an approximate distance of 330 meters for 10
minutes, the communiqué added. In another issued communiqué, the Army Command's
Orientation Directorate indicated that a similar Israeli gunboat also violated
the territorial waters off Ras al-Naqoura at 5:16 p.m. on Saturday to an
approximate distance of 200 meters for an interval of 7 minutes. All breaches
are under follow-up by the Lebanese Army, in coordination with the United
Nations Interim Force in South Lebanon (UNIFIL).
Governor of Australia and his wife arrive in Beirut on an
official visit
Sun 22 Oct 2017/NNA - Australia's Governor Sir Peter Cosgrove and his wife, Lady
Lynn Cosgrove, arrived Sunday afternoon at Rafic Hariri International Airport on
an official visit, during which he will meet with President Michel Aoun and
senior Lebanese officials. The Australian Governor and his wife were greeted at
the Airport's VIP Lounge by Secretary of State for Presidential Affairs Pierre
Raffoul and his wife, Australian Ambassador Glenn Miles, and several prominent
military officials and a delegation from the Australian Embassy in Lebanon.
Khouri for regulating economic relation between Lebanon and
displaced Syrians
Sat 21 Oct 2017/NNA - Minister of Trade and Economy, Raed Khouri,
called Saturday for regulating the economic relationship between Lebanon and the
displaced Syrians and for implementing Lebanese legislations. In a press
conference held at his ministry office, Khouri touched on the repercussions of
Syrian displacement on the Lebanese economy, particularly concerning illegal and
unlicensed institutions. "As a State, we are required to regulate the economic
relationship between Lebanon and the displaced Syrians, and to solely apply
Lebanese laws and regulations," Khouri emphasized. "Syrian workers are entitled
according to the law to work in three sectors only, namely in construction,
agriculture and public wastes; yet, they are working in different sectors
contrary to the law," he continued to explain. Khouri referred to several
procedural steps adopted by his ministry in this context, noting, "We have asked
municipalities to close down illegal institutions." "We deeply sympathize with
our Syrian displaced brethrens and feel with their suffering because we have
lived in wars and displacement. We wish them a safe and dignified return home,
especially in the presence of secure areas in Syria. However, pending their
return to their country, we are required as a State to regulate the economic
relationship between Lebanon and Syrian refugees," Khouri underscored.
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on October 22-23/17
Soleimani Gave Military ‘Guidance’ from Kirkuk Prior to Iraqi Offensive
Asharq Al Awsat/October 22/17/Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani had
made repeated warnings to Kurdish leaders in northern Iraq, asking them to
withdraw from oil-rich Kirkuk or face a fierce Iraqi government offensive.
Soleimani, who is commander of foreign operations for Iran’s Revolutionary
Guards, had met leaders from the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) in the city
of Sulaimania the day before Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi ordered his
forces to advance on Kirkuk, according to a PUK lawmaker briefed on the meeting.
His message was clear, either withdraw or lose Iran as a strategic ally, said
the lawmaker according to Reuters. The Iranian official had paid at least three
visits to the Iraqi Kurdistan Region in October before the launch of the Iraqi
government’s lightening operation in the North to regain regions that Kurds had
seized during their fight against ISIS over the past three years.
“Abadi has all the regional powers and the West behind him and nothing will stop
him from forcing you to return back to the mountains if he decides so,” the
lawmaker quoted Soleimani as telling the PUK leadership. The Iranian general
evoked late Iraqi president Saddam Hussein’s massive attack on a Kurdish
rebellion in 1991, when almost the entire Kurdish population fled northern Iraq
to the mountains, the PUK lawmaker said. “Soleimani’s visit ... was to give a
last-minute chance for the decision-makers not to commit a fatal mistake,” said
the lawmaker, who like others interviewed in this story declined to be
identified because of the sensitivity of the issue.
Commanders of the Kurdish Peshmerga forces have accused Iran of orchestrating
the Shi‘ite-led Iraqi central government’s push into areas under their control,
a charge senior Iranian officials have denied. But Iran has made no secret of
its presence in Iraq. “Tehran’s military help is not a secret anymore. You can
find General Soleimani’s pictures in Iraq everywhere,” said an official close to
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani. “Now, beside political issues, Kirkuk’s oil is
a very key element for Iran, which is an OPEC member. Control of those oil
fields by Iran’s enemies would be disastrous for us. Why should we let them
enter the oil market?”Kirkuk fell to Iraqi government forces on Monday. Their
offensive followed a referendum last month in which the semi-autonomous
Kurdistan region voted to secede from Iraq against Baghdad’s wishes. But Iraq’s
two main Kurdish parties have been at odds over both the referendum and the
approach to the crisis in Kirkuk, which the Kurds consider to be the heart of
their homeland.
The PUK, a close ally of Iran, accused its rival, the Kurdistan Democratic Party
(KDP), of putting the Kurds at risk of military intervention and isolation by
pushing hard for the vote, which won wide approval for independence. The KDP is
headed by President Masoud Barzani. Soleimani has been allied to the PUK for
years, but the referendum has drawn him even closer to Kurdish politics and
expanded Iran’s reach in Iraq beyond the Baghdad government. The Iranian general
is no stranger to conflicts in Iraq, which fought an eight-year war with Iran in
the 1980s. He has often been seen in footage from the frontlines, and Iran has
long helped Baghdad to carry out its military strategy through paramilitary
Shi‘ite militias which it funds and arms. Before the referendum, Soleimani
suggested to Kurdish leaders that holding a vote on secession -- which Iran
feared would encourage its own Kurdish population to agitate for greater
autonomy -- would be risky. “The Iranians were very clear. They have been very
clear that there will be conflict, that these territories will be lost,” said
one prominent Iraqi Kurdish politician who met Soleimani ahead of the September
25 referendum. On October 6, barely a week after the vote, Soleimani attended
the funeral of PUK leader Jalal Talabani. Again, he wanted to make sure even his
closest Kurdish allies understood the dangers of not withdrawing from Kirkuk,
officials said. A senior Iranian diplomat in Iraq and an official in Iran close
to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s office said Soleimani met with Kurdish leaders
after Talibani’s funeral and urged them to withdraw from Kirkuk and in exchange
Tehran would protect their interests. Soleimani met with one of Talabani’s sons,
Bafel, a few days after his father was buried, one of the PUK officials said.
“Soleimani said Abadi should be taken very seriously. You should understand
this,” the official said.
An Iranian source in Iraq said Soleimani was in Kirkuk two nights before the
Iraqi government offensive for “a couple of hours to give military guidance.”
Iraqi intelligence sources said Tehran sent a clear signal to the PUK. “We
understand from our sources on the ground that neighboring Iran played a
decisive role in making the PUK chose the right course with Baghdad,” one Iraqi
intelligence official told Reuters. Tensions over the referendum and Kirkuk have
deepened divisions between the two main political parties in northern Iraq. The
KDP accused the PUK of betraying the Kurdish cause by capitulating to Iran and
striking a deal to withdraw. “The Talabani clan were behind the offensive on
Kirkuk. They asked Qassem (Soleimani) for help and his troops were there on the
ground,” said a source close to Massoud Barzani, president of the Kurdistan
Regional Government and head of the KDP.
“It is becoming clear that Iran is directing the operations to destroy the KDP.”The
PUK strongly denies this. Talabani’s son Bafel accused the KDP of missing a
zero-hour chance to avoid losing Kirkuk by failing to reach a deal over a
military base which Iraqi government forces had demanded to take back.
“Unfortunately we reacted too slowly. And we find ourselves where we are today,”
Bafel told Reuters. Two other Kurdish political sources gave a similar account.
Iran and Soleimani offered early assistance to northern Iraq’s Kurds in the
fight against ISIS, a rallying point for the Kurdish community. But after the
devastating loss of Kirkuk, Iraqi Kurds have been left disillusioned. “They
(both PUK and KDP leaders) just make decisions on their own and play with
people’s lives. In the end, we pay the price,” said pensioner Abdullah Ahmed in
Sulaimania. “This is a disaster for everyone. Everyone was united against Daesh
(Islamic State). Now they are back just looking out for themselves.”
In Saudi, Tillerson Demands Iranian Militias Leave Iraq
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 22/17/U.S. Secretary of State Rex
Tillerson on Sunday demanded that Iranian "militias" leave Iraq at a press
conference in Riyadh, where the U.S. diplomat is holding talks with top Gulf
officials. "Certainly Iranian militias that are in Iraq, now that the fighting
against (the Islamic State group) is coming to a close, those militias need to
go home," Tillerson said at a press conference in Riyadh. "All foreign fighters
need to go home."Tillerson's Gulf visit comes as part of concerted efforts to
curb Shiite Iran's influence in the region including boosting the clout of
Sunni-ruled Saudi Arabia in Iraq, where Iran backs Shiite militias fighting in
the north.Tillerson's visit also follows President Donald Trump's announcement
of an aggressive strategy against Tehran and his refusal to certify the Iran
nuclear deal.
Tillerson Attends Landmark Talks between Saudi, Iraqi
Leaders
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 22/17/Top U.S. diplomat Rex Tillerson
attended a landmark meeting Sunday between Saudi Arabia and Iraq aimed at
upgrading strategic ties between the two countries and countering Iran's
regional influence. Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi and Saudi King Salman
held the first meeting of the joint Saudi-Iraqi coordination council that aims
to boost cooperation after years of tensions. Abadi hailed the meeting as an
"important step toward enhancing relations," echoing similar comments from King
Salman. "We are facing in our region serious challenges in the form of
extremism, terrorism as well as attempts to destabilize our countries," the
Saudi monarch said. "These attempts require our full attention."Iraq is seeking
economic benefits from closer ties with Riyadh as both countries suffer from a
protracted oil slump. Saudi Arabia is also seeking to counter Iranian influence
in Iraq. "This event highlights the strength and breadth as well as the great
potential of the relations between your countries," Tillerson said, referring to
the meeting. After years of tense relations, ties between Sunni-ruled Saudi
Arabia and Shiite-majority Iraq have begun looking up in recent months. After
former dictator Saddam Hussein's August 1990 invasion of Kuwait, Riyadh severed
relations with Baghdad and closed its border posts with its northern neighbor.
Ties remained strained even after Saddam's ouster in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion
of Iraq, since when successive Shiite-dominated governments in Baghdad have
stayed close to Tehran. But a flurry of visits between the two countries this
year appears to indicate a thawing of ties. Abadi's tour coincides with Saudi
Energy Minister Khaled al-Faleh's high profile visit to Baghdad on Saturday
where he called for the strengthening of economic relations to boost oil prices.
At the opening of the Baghdad International Fair, Falih hailed what he called
"the new Iraq, on the ambitious road to prosperity and growth while
strengthening its relations with the world."
Iraq's Abadi: 'Hero' who Tackled Mission Impossible
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 22/17/When Haider al-Abadi was tasked with
forming a new Iraqi government in August 2014, just weeks after a lightning
offensive by the Islamic State group, many believed he would fail. Three years
later, the stocky prime minister with a close-cut white beard has transformed
what many in Iraq considered "mission impossible" into a success story. He has
rebuilt the crumbling armed forces, chased IS from more than 90 percent of
territory it had seized -- around a third of Iraq -- and retaken disputed areas
in the north from Kurdish peshmerga fighters. "The standard view of Abadi was
that he was indecisive, weak and bit too conciliatory for Iraqi politics," says
Fanar Haddad, a research fellow at the Middle East Institute of the National
University of Singapore. When Abadi took over from Nuri al-Maliki he faced huge
challenges, including rampant corruption, poor infrastructure, falling oil
prices and the jihadist threat. Abadi was up against "the world's hardest job",
says Sajad Jiyad, director of the Baghdad-based independent al-Bayan Center for
Planning and Studies. But dressed in military garb or suit and tie, Abadi over
time announced several military victories while trying to battle corruption by
rolling out sweeping reform.
His policies won him supporters.
"He is the best prime minister in Iraq's history. He speaks little but acts a
lot," one of Abadi's 2.5 million followers on Facebook recently wrote. Analysts
say Abadi has succeeded where other Iraqi premiers failed."His calm and
conciliatory manner and his openness to dealing with a broad array of actors
(inside and outside Iraq) stand in stark contrast to his predecessor," says
Haddad. A recent survey carried out by an Iraqi polling institute found the
Shiite premier has a "75 percent approval rating," even including Iraq's Sunni
minority, Jiyad notes.
From exile to politics
A member of the Dawa party, Abadi was born in 1952 in a wealthy Baghdad district
but lived in exile for much of Saddam Hussein's rule, including in Britain where
he earned a doctorate in engineering from the University of Manchester. Two of
Abadi's brothers were arrested and executed by Saddam's regime for membership of
the Dawa party, which opposed his rule, while a third was imprisoned for a
decade on the same charge. Abadi returned to Iraq after Saddam's overthrow in
2003 and was communications minister in the interim government set up after the
dictator's fall. In 2006 he was elected to parliament, chairing an economy,
investment and reconstruction committee and then a finance committee. He was
voted deputy parliament speaker in July 2014, before being tapped to form the
government a month later. Perhaps his greatest accomplishment since then was to
rebuild the Iraqi police and army which had been weakened by decades of
conflicts, including the 2003 U.S.-led invasion. Abadi succeeded in remobilizing
tens of thousands of force members with help from Iraq's allies, including the
United States, which stepped in to train and equip them. Under his command,
Iraq's forces chased IS jihadists from more than 90 percent of the territory
they had seized, dealing a major blow to the group's self-proclaimed
"caliphate." And earlier this month, Iraq's army retook Kurdish-held positions
in and around Kirkuk province, outside the autonomous Kurdish region of northern
Iraq.
International player
These achievements have transformed Abadi into a hero, almost worshiped by many
Iraqis. "Today there seems to be a bit of a cult following growing around Abadi,"
says Haddad. "One hopes it doesn't go to his head; after all, Maliki in
2008-2009 was in a similar place to where Abadi is today," he adds. Analysts say
Abadi won the day thanks to his step-by-step approach. He also embarked on a
battle against corruption and under his tenure several officials have been
arrested and tried for graft. Jiyad notes that Abadi also "deftly positioned
Iraq on the international stage" and succeeded in securing the support of
international allies. Diplomats based in Baghdad describe Abadi as someone who
knows how to establish himself and command respect. On Sunday, Abadi visited
Saudi Arabia in a bid to ease years of tension between Shiite-majority Baghdad
and the Sunni-ruled kingdom. The trip -- which Haddad says would have been
"unthinkable" under Maliki -- is seen as another diplomatic coup for Abadi,
whose government is allied with Saudi rival Iran. But despite his many
achievements, "it is important to recognize the limits on what Abadi can do",
says Haddad. Iraq, he says, faces "gargantuan challenges", including
reconstruction and the issue of people displaced by fighting, "that are beyond
the control of any one actor."
Gunman Holds Hostages at UK Bowling Alley
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 22/17/A man with a sawed-off shotgun took
several people hostage Sunday at a bowling alley in the English city of
Nuneaton, 166 kilometers northwest of London, British media reports said.
Warwickshire Police said they were "currently dealing with an ongoing incident"
at Bermuda Park and urged members of the public to avoid the area. One
eye-witness, Dean Rogers, told the Coventry Telegraph there were up to 30 armed
officers at the scene. Another, Lloyd Weightman, told the paper a man with a
shotgun commanded him to "get the f*** out" of the bowling alley in Bermuda
Park. He said he and his two sons, aged seven and three, went into a nearby
cinema, which was placed on lockdown. Footage shared on social media appeared to
show armed police at the scene.
Russian Opposition Chief Navalny Says Released from Jail
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 22/17/Russian opposition leader Alexei
Navalny said Sunday he had been released from the Moscow detention centre where
he had served a 20-day term for organizing unauthorised protests. "Hi. I'm out,"
Navalny wrote on Instagram, posting a picture of himself on a street. His
release was arranged by police to evade crowds of journalists waiting outside
the detention center.
Bahrain Sends Civilian 'Cell' to Military Court
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 22/17/Bahraini authorities have referred a
group of civilians accused of targeting security forces to a military court,
state media said Sunday, months after a constitutional amendment expanded the
court's reach. General Youssef Rashid Fleifel, the head of Bahrain's military
justice department, announced a civilian "terrorist cell" had been charged and
would face a military trial, state news agency BNA reported.Fleifel did not give
further detail on the number or identities of those to stand trial, a date for
which has yet to be announced. Bahrain's parliament in April approved a
constitutional amendment, ratified by the king, granting military courts the
right to try civilians on terrorism-linked charges or attacks on the country's
security forces. The constitution had previously limited military trials to
members of the army or security forces. Authorities sent the first civilian case
to military court in May. No details on that case against Fadhel Radhi, arrested
in September 2016, have been made public. A key U.S. ally located between Iran
and Saudi Arabia, Bahrain since 2011 has been rocked by unrest as authorities
continue to crack down on protests demanding a change in government. The tiny
Gulf archipelago is home to a majority Shiite population and has been ruled for
more than two centuries by the Sunni Al-Khalifa dynasty. The main island is also
home to the U.S. Fifth Fleet and a British military base that is still under
construction. Bahrain has accused Iran of backing the protests to destabilize
the country, an accusation Tehran denies.
U.S.-Backed Forces Seize Major Syria Oilfield
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 22/17/A U.S.-backed Arab-Kurd alliance
announced on Sunday it had retaken one of Syria's largest oilfields from the
Islamic State group in the east of country.
The al-Omar oilfield in the province of Deir Ezzor produced 30,000 barrels per
day before the start of Syria's conflict in 2011 and became a key source of
income for the jihadists after they seized it in 2014. U.S.-led coalition air
strikes destroyed the field in 2015, after the jihadists had reaped estimated
oil sale revenues from it of between $1.7 million and $5.1 million a month,
according to the coalition. "The Syrian Democratic Forces seize the whole of the
al-Omar oilfield, the biggest field in Syria," the alliance said in a short
statement. It said regime forces stood three kilometers (less than two miles)
away from the field.
The SDF and Russia-backed government forces are waging separate offensives
against IS in the oil-rich province of Deir Ezzor on Syria's eastern border with
Iraq.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitor relying of a
network of sources inside Syria, said SDF fighters took control of al-Omar three
days after IS members retreated. Its capture came after the jihadists led "a
counterattack on regime positions near the field late Saturday, pushing them
away from it," Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman said. Al-Omar lies on the
eastern bank of the Euphrates River, around 10 kilometers (six miles) east of
the town of Mayadeen. Government forces and their allies seized Mayadeen from IS
last week in an advance whose target the Observatory said was to recapture
al-Omar. On Sunday, the monitor said the SDF had also seized the Sayjan oilfield
to the north of al-Omar overnight. Deir Ezzor province is rich with oil and gas
fields that served as a key revenue stream for IS at the height of its power.
The SDF, which earlier this week forced IS from its former stronghold Raqa, has
been fighting the jihadists on the eastern bank of the Euphrates. Syria's army
is carrying out a separate operation mostly on the western bank of the river,
including in the provincial capital Deir Ezzor city.
Russia Likens U.S. Coalition Bombing of Raqa to WWII
Dresden
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 22/Russia on Sunday accused the U.S.-led
coalition in Syria of having flattened Raqa with a Dresden-like bombing campaign
and masking the destruction with a rush of humanitarian aid. In a statement, the
defense ministry said that Raqa -- the capital of the Islamic State group's
self-proclaimed caliphate -- "inherited the fate of Dresden in 1945, razed to
the ground by Anglo-American bombings." U.S.-backed Kurdish-led forces last week
recaptured Raqa, the capital of IS' self-proclaimed caliphate and its last major
stronghold in Syria. U.S. officials hailed the event, led by President Donald
Trump who, using another acronym for IS, said "the end of the ISIS caliphate is
in sight." "The bravura statements by official representatives of the U.S.
administration about the 'outstanding victory' over IS in Raqa prompt
bafflement," the Russian ministry said. The U.S. is overplaying the strategic
significance of the fall of Raqa, it charged. In reality, Raqa is a "provincial
city" that is much smaller than Deir Ezzor, where a Russian-backed Syrian regime
operation is underway, the ministry said. It accused Western countries of
pumping aid into Raqa to mask the degree of destruction inflicted on the city.
Moscow, it said, had previously received only refusals from the West to its
requests for international humanitarian aid. "There is only one (reason) -- the
aim is to sweep away traces of barbaric bombings by U.S. aviation and the
'coalition' that buried in Raqa's ruins thousands of peaceful citizens
'liberated' from the IS," the ministry claimed. Russia has been operating a
bombing campaign in Syria since 2015, when it stepped in to support President
Bashar al-Assad's rule and tipped the conflict in his favor. Human rights
monitors say that the raids have resulted in many civilian casualties.
Trump Says End of IS Caliphate 'in Sight' after Raqa's Fall
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 22/U.S. President Donald
Trump said overnight that a transition can soon begin to set conditions for
lasting peace in Syria now that the end of the Islamic State "caliphate is in
sight" with the fall of Raqa. The United States and its allies will support
diplomatic negotiations "that end the violence, allow refugees to return safely
home, and yield a political transition that honors the will of the Syrian
people," Trump said in a statement. The declaration came four days after
U.S.-backed Kurdish-led forces recaptured Raqa, the capital of IS'
self-proclaimed caliphate and its last major stronghold in Syria. Trump said the
entire city has been liberated from IS control, which he said marked a "critical
breakthrough" in the global struggle against the militant group. "With the
liberation of ISIS's capital and the vast majority of its territory, the end of
the ISIS caliphate is in sight," Trump said, using an alternate acronym for the
Islamic State group. "We will soon transition into a new phase in which we will
support local security forces, de-escalate violence across Syria, and advance
the conditions for lasting peace, so that the terrorists cannot return to
threaten our collective security again."
Since capturing it in 2014, IS had used Raqa as a base for planning and
conducting attacks in the west, including the November 13, 2015 suicide bombings
and mass shootings in Paris that killed 130 people. French Foreign Minister Yves
Le Drian celebrated IS' defeat on Friday and declared "the crimes of the
Bataclan have not gone unpunished," referring to the concert venue where IS
jihadists massacred 90 concertgoers.
Raqa in ruins
The more than four months of fighting have left Raqa in ruins, however, and
taken a heavy toll in human lives. The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights put
the number of dead at more than 3,200, including 1,130 civilians. A massive
reconstruction effort will be needed to make the city habitable again, but it is
unclear who will undertake it. A spokesman for the U.S.-backed Syrian Defense
Forces said the city will be handed over to Raqa's civil council once clearing
operations have been completed. But a French military spokesman said it will be
many weeks before civilians can safely return due to "the quantity of explosive
devices Daesh left behind."Trump's statement did not address whether U.S. plans
include a commitment to rebuild areas in Syria retaken from IS control. Also
unanswered is how Washington will deal with the Russian-backed forces of Syria's
President Bashar al-Assad, now that IS is effectively being cleared from the
battlefield. So far, the Trump administration has focused on defeating IS, but
some analysts warn the accelerated campaign is opening the way for Assad and his
Russian and Iranian backers to fill the vacuum.
Assad fate unmentioned
In his statement, Trump made no mention of removing Assad from power as part of
a negotiated political solution, a goal pursued unsuccessfully by former
president Barack Obama. Trump had already signaled a turn away from that
objective earlier this year when he shut down a clandestine CIA program to
supply Syrian rebels with arms. Syrian government forces, meanwhile, are engaged
in twin Russian-backed offensives against IS, mopping up the last pockets it
still holds in the desert and pushing down the Euphrates Valley towards the
Iraqi border in the east. On Saturday, Syrian troops and militia retook the
desert town of al-Qaryatain, in Homs province, in the latest setback for IS,
according to Syrian state media.The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights said more
than 200 IS fighters had withdrawn during the night into the desert, which
stretches all the way to the Iraqi border.
Erdogan, Putin
Discuss Turkish Deployment in Syria’s Idlib
Asharq Al Awsat/October 22/17/Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan held talks
on Friday with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on the latest developments
in Syria and the upcoming Astana peace talks. During a telephone call to Putin,
Erdogan informed him of the developments linked to Turkish troop deployment in
the de-escalation zone in Idlib, said sources from the Turkish presidency. The
two officials agreed to continue close cooperation and coordination between
Ankara and Moscow over regional issues. Meanwhile, Turkish Defense Minister
Nurettin Canikli stressed that his country’s launch of an operation in the Idlib
province is aimed at countering the imminent terrorist dangers against Turkey.
He explained that the threat of the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG)
against Turkey still stands. “We will not rest until it is removed,” he vowed.
Furthermore, Canikli strongly condemned the United States’ equipping of Kurdish
organizations in Syria with modern weapons and gear, wondering why this armament
has continued even after the majority of Iraqi and Syrian territories have been
liberated from the ISIS terrorist group. Turkish Chief of Staff Hulusi Akar
stressed on Friday that Ankara has taken all necessary measures to confront any
threat to its security in wake of the developments in Syria and Iraq. He stated
that Turkish operations in Idlib in northwest Syria will continue in order to
oversee the ceasefire and cement stability and security in the region. In its
continued criticism of the US, Ankara condemned the Syrian Democratic Forces’ (SDF)
raising of a poster of Kurdistan Workers’ Party leader Abdullah Ocalan in
Syria’s Raqqa city after it was liberated from ISIS. A Turkish government
spokesman said that “terrorists” have announced their presence in Raqqa by
raising that poster. He also noted that the development refutes US assertions
that there were no terrorists in the city. He also spoke of a “terrorist belt”
that will be formed from northern Syria to the Mediterranean, which poses a
major threat to Turkey. Commenting on Ocalan’s poster being raised in Raqqa, the
US embassy in Ankara said that the PKK leader is “not worthy of respect.”"We
have been clear that the liberation of Raqqa is an accomplishment for all
Syrians and we expect all parties to avoid actions that would be seen as
offensive or create tensions," it added in a statement. "The United States
Government works closely with Turkey to fight terrorism and increase regional
stability. The PKK is a Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, and Ocalan is
in prison in Turkey for acts of terrorism as part of the PKK. He does not merit
veneration," the embassy said on Saturday.
Qatar-Hamas Ties Weakening as Israel Warns Movement Will Pay for its Iran Ties
Asharq Al Awsat/October
22/17/Israel threatened the Palestinian movement Hamas that it will pay the
greater price for continuing its ties with the Iranian regime. Israeli
Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories Major General Yoav
Mordechai pointed out to a visit by Hamas deputy politburo chief Saleh al-Arouri
to Tehran. “The visit indicates that Hamas leaders do not try to hide the truth
that the Iranian regime, which has been oppressing its people for 40 years, is
managing Hamas’ affairs in Gaza,” he said. “Despite the developments on the
Palestinian scene, the Hamas leaders, who are in awe of the Iranian support,
continue to receive orders from the extremist regime that aspires to spread its
so-called Islamic revolution,” he added. “At the end of the day, who will pay
the price for Hamas’ blind obedience to Iran? The residents of Gaza,” stressed
the Israeli official. Meanwhile, Arouri had arrived in Iran at the head of a
high-ranking delegation and as part of his first foreign tour after the signing
of the Hamas-Fatah reconciliation in Cairo earlier this month. The visit
signifies a new Hamas approach to bolster its ties with Iran. Arouri, who
already enjoys strong ties with Iranian officials, including Revolutionary
Guards Corps commanders, is expected to bridge any gaps between the movement and
Tehran. Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Arouri and other members of the new
politburo are leading a policy to restore Hamas’ ties with its old allies,
including Iran and Syria. Arouri enjoys the backing of Hamas chief in Gaza Yehya
al-Sinwar, who earlier this week spoke highly of Iran, stating: “Iran is the
greatest arms, training and arms backer of the Qassam Brigades.”“Those who
believe that we will sever our ties with it are delusional,” he added. The new
Hamas-Iran rapprochement comes in defiance to Israel that had previously
demanded that the movement lay down its arms and cut its relations with Tehran
as conditions to its approval of the Palestinian reconciliation. Meanwhile, on
Hamas’ ties with Qatar, Sinwar said that they were “not good” in wake of the
Cairo-sponsored reconciliation. A Palestinian source said that Qatar’s ties with
Hamas deteriorated after the latter’s rapprochement with Egypt and former Fatah
official Ahmed Dahlan.This is not the first time that a Hamas official speaks of
the deterioration of ties with Doha as politburo member Moussa Abou Marzouq had
previously mentioned that disputes exist between the two sides.
Germany
'Approves' Controversial Israel Submarine Deal- Israeli Sources
Asharq Al Awsat/October 22/17/The German government has approved the sale of
three submarines to Israel that are at the heart of the Israel Police’s Case
3000 probe of possible bribery, fraud and kickbacks on the part of former top
defense officials and confidants of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli
sources said on Friday. "The Germans have given their approval to the deal," an
Israeli official familiar with the issue said, according to AFP. Earlier, Berlin
postponed signing the MoU on the sale due to an ongoing probe into corruption
allegations relating to the agreement. The deal is worth some €1.5 billion, with
27% subsidized by the German state. In July, several Israelis were arrested on
suspicion of offenses including bribery and money laundering around the deal to
buy the Dolphin submarines from German industrial giant ThyssenKrupp. David
Shimron, a relative of Netanyahu and his family lawyer who also represented
ThyssenKrupp in Israel, was among those questioned and then released. The
investigation was prompted by a Channel 10 news report which alleged that there
was a conflict of interests in the deal due to the involvement of attorney David
Shimron. Shimron, who is Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's private lawyer,
also represents ThyssenKrupp’s representative in Israel, Miki Ganor. Germany,
however, has emphasized that despite the reported approval, no deal has been
signed. "We had other talks about it, but a deal was not made until now," a
German government spokesperson told AFP. German magazine Der Spiegel reported
that Germany will wait for Israeli prosecutors to conclude all investigations in
the corruption scandal involving Netanyahu before delivering the three
submarines deal. Netanyahu recently lashed out at Israel's police and media over
a wider investigation into graft allegations, claiming that there "is a
transparent media campaign" against him.
After Backlash, WHO
Reconsidering Appointing Mugabe as Goodwill Ambassador
Asharq Al-Awsat/October 22/17/After much outrage, the World Health Organization
will reconsider its choice to appoint Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe as a
goodwill ambassador. The move had sparked global outrage, while several former
and current WHO staff said privately they were appalled at the "poor judgment"
and "miscalculation" by Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Tedros.
Tedro was elected the first African head of WHO in May. Mugabe was head of the
African Union (AU) when the bloc endorsed Tedros - a former health and foreign
minister of Ethiopia - over other African candidates for the top post, without
any real regional contest or debate, they said. Mugabe, 93, is blamed in the
West for destroying Zimbabwe's economy and numerous human rights abuses during
his 37 years leading the country as either president or prime minister. WHO
named Mugabe to the largely ceremonial post at a high-level WHO meeting on
chronic diseases, attended by both men, in Uruguay on Wednesday.
Tedros praised Zimbabwe as "a country that places universal health coverage and
health promotion at the center of its policies to provide health care to all".
Tedros, who has returned to Geneva, said in a tweet on Saturday evening that he
was "rethinking the approach in light of WHO values" and that a statement was
forthcoming. The US, which has imposed sanctions on Mugabe for alleged human
rights violations, said it was "disappointed." "He (Tedros) has to
remember where his funding comes from," said one health official who declined to
be identified. "This appointment clearly contradicts the United Nations ideals
of respect for human rights and human dignity," the State Department said.
Britain said Mugabe's appointment as a goodwill ambassador for non-communicable
diseases in Africa was "surprising and disappointing" and that it risked
overshadowing the WHO's global work. Health and human rights leaders chimed in.
"The decision to appoint Robert Mugabe as a WHO goodwill ambassador is deeply
disappointing and wrong," said Dr. Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome
Trust, a major British charitable foundation. "Robert Mugabe fails in every way
to represent the values WHO should stand for."Ireland's health minister, Simon
Harris, called the appointment "offensive, bizarre." ''Mugabe corruption
decimates Zimbabwe health care," tweeted the head of Human Rights Watch, Kenneth
Roth.
Two dozen organizations — including the World Heart Federation and Cancer
Research UK — released a statement slamming the appointment, saying health
officials were "shocked and deeply concerned" and citing his "long track record
of human rights violations." The groups said they had raised their concerns with
Tedros on the sidelines of the conference, to no avail. Zimbabwe's government
has not commented on Mugabe's appointment, but a state-run Zimbabwe Herald
newspaper headline called it a "new feather in president's cap." The southern
African nation once was known as the region's prosperous breadbasket. But in
2008, the charity Physicians for Human Rights released a report documenting
failures in Zimbabwe's health system, saying Mugabe's policies had led to a
man-made crisis. "The government of Robert Mugabe presided over the dramatic
reversal of its population's access to food, clean water, basic sanitation and
health care," the group concluded. Mugabe's policies led directly to "the
shuttering of hospitals and clinics, the closing of its medical school and the
beatings of health workers." The 93-year-old Mugabe, who has led Zimbabwe since
independence in 1980, has come under criticism at home for his frequent overseas
travels that have cost impoverished Zimbabwe millions of dollars. His repeated
visits to Singapore have heightened concerns over his health, even as he pursues
re-election next year. The US in 2003 imposed targeted sanctions, a travel ban
and an asset freeze against Mugabe and close associates, citing his government's
rights abuses and evidence of electoral fraud.
Barzani may be summoned by Iraq’s judiciary, parliamentary
sources say
Staff writer, Al Arabiya EnglishSunday, 22 October 2017 /Sources at the Iraqi
parliament said the judiciary intends to issue a summons against Iraq’s
Kurdistan Region Government (KRG) President Masoud Barzani following lawsuits
filed against him regarding 55 alleged violations. It is expected that the
judicial summons will be issued on Sunday. The lawsuits cite affairs related to
the referendum and to threatening Iraqi security and the illegal smuggling of
oil, in addition to other administrative and legal violations. On Thursday, a
Baghdad court issued an arrest warrant for Kosrat Rasul, the vice president of
Iraqi Kurdistan, on charges of “provocation” against Iraq’s armed forces.
Meanwhile, the Iraqi parliament’s Security and Defense Committee recommended the
joint operations’ command to suspend arming the Peshmerga forces affiliated with
the North Iraqi area after they shelled Iraqi forces in Kirkuk.
US Treasury Secretary to visit Middle East over Iran
threats
Staff writer, Al Arabiya EnglishSaturday, 21 October 2017/US Secretary of
Treasury Steven Mnuchin will be visiting the Middle East this week to discuss
the Terrorist Financing Target Center (TFTC) partnership and other matters on
Iran. Accompanying Mnuchin is Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial
Intelligence Sigal Mandelker. The visit is set to take place from October 25
through to October 30. The US representatives will be stopping in Saudi Arabia,
the UAE and Qatar. Discussions will also touch upon national security
initiatives against terrorism and illegal financial incidents. In a statement on
Friday, Mnuchin said that he and Mandelker “will engage partners in the Middle
East on the Trump administration’s new strategy toward countering the
destabilizing influence of Iran in the region.” The Saudi Arabia visit is set to
witness Mnuchin commemorating the TFTC’s inauguration. He will also be
delivering the keynote address to the Future Investment Initiative summit, added
the Treasury.
Canada calls for Mugabe WHO appointment to be rescinded without delay
October 21, 2017 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
Global Affairs Canada today issued the following statement on the World Health
Organization’s (WHO’s) appointment of Robert Mugabe as goodwill ambassador for
non-communicable diseases in Africa:
“Canada condemns the unexpected appointment by the World Health Organization of
Robert Mugabe as goodwill ambassador for non-communicable diseases in Africa.
“Given the serious human rights abuses under Mugabe’s regime, such an
appointment is inconceivable and unacceptable. It goes against the goals of
protecting the world’s most vulnerable populations.
“Canada calls for this appointment to be rescinded.”
Contacts
Media Relations Office
Global Affairs Canada
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from
miscellaneous sources published on October
22-23/17
Abandoning our Kurdish allies is a win for our Iranian
enemies
Michael Pregent/Fox News/October 22/17
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/21/abandoning-our-kurdish-allies-is-win-for-our-iranian-enemies.html
It makes no sense for a nation to treat its enemies kindly and its allies
harshly. Any nation that tries this foolish approach will see its enemies grow
stronger and more dangerous, and will lose its allies when it abandons them.
Yet for eight years, the Obama administration followed this upside-down policy,
and received contempt and bad behavior in return from nations around the world.
And now, unfortunately, the Trump administration is following this policy with
Iran, by “not taking sides” to prevent the Iraqi government from using military
force against our Kurdish allies.
Following a Sept. 25 vote by the Kurds in Kirkuk calling for independence from
Iraq, Iraqi troops and Iranian-backed militias moved north into the Kurdish
province to take control from the Kurdistan Regional Government. Iraqi troops
and Shia militias seized the last district in Kirkuk on Friday from Kurdish
fighters, known as the Peshmerga, after a three-hour battle.
The Kurds had controlled Kirkuk since 2014, when Iraqi troops fled the forces of
the Islamic State terrorist group, also known as ISIS. While remaining part of
Iraq, the Kurdish province operated with a high degree autonomy.
The Iraqi Kurdish independence referendum sparked fears that Kurds in
neighboring areas of Iran, Turkey and Syria would want to seek independence as
well and unite to form a new nation – an idea opposed by all the those countries
and Iraq.
The Iraqi Kurds have been loyal U.S. allies in our fight against Al Qaeda and
ISIS, and have fought bravely and effectively. American troops have fought and
died with our Kurdish allies defending Iraq and we have spent blood and treasure
trying to build reliable partners in Iraq’s Security Forces.
But the Iraqi forces are also supported by Iran, including that nation’s Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps, which was designated as a terrorist organization by
the U.S. Treasury Department earlier this month.
And Iran is clearly an enemy of the United States, Israel and many of our Arab
allies. It is a state sponsor of terrorism and an oppressor of its own people,
with particularly harsh restrictions on women, homosexuals and Christians.
President Trump has sharply criticized the nation’s conduct and has threatened
to withdraw from the agreement designed to keep Iran from developing nuclear
weapons.
It’s in America’s interest to have good and peaceful relations with and between
the Kurds and the Iraqis, despite Iran’s support of Iraq. But we shouldn’t
abandon our Kurdish allies to achieve this goal.
The man most responsible for the failure of the U.S. to give adequate support to
the Kurds is Brett McGurk, President Trump’s special envoy for the Global
Coalition to Counter ISIS. He held the same position in the Obama administration
and has been allowed to keep his job.
President Obama replaced one of our most respected military leaders – Marine
Corps Gen. John Allen – with lawyer McGurk. While serving as envoy to Iraq,
McGurk has presided over the Iranian takeover of what’s left of Iraq.
Shamefully, the State and Defense Departments followed McGurk’s strategy and
gave tacit approval for the Iraqi government and its Iranian allies to move
against our dedicated Kurdish friends.
McGurk told U.S. officials and Iraq, Turkey and Iran that he could convince the
Kurds not to hold their independence referendum. He told U.S. and Kurdish
officials that he could stop Baghdad from using military force against the
Kurds. He failed on both accounts.
As President Trump has noted, Iran received $1.7 billion from the Obama
administration for signing the nuclear agreement with the U.S. and other nations
“Just imagine the sight of those huge piles of money being hauled off by the
Iranians waiting at the airport for the cash,” President Trump said. McGurk was
one of the U.S. officials who handed over that money to the Iranians.
One of the leaders of Iranian forces backing Iraq against its Kurdish citizens
is Qassem Soleimani, who commands the Revolutionary Guards Quds Force. He is a
terrorist who has been killing Americans for years in Iraq and is still doing it
through the Taliban in Afghanistan. Half a world away from the NFL, Soleimani
also disrespects our flag, having his forces walk on it in parades.
Last month, the Kurds believed that being a proven ally of the United States
against former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, Al Qaeda and ISIS would result in
America recognizing their referendum for independence from the Iraqi state.
But the hard-line that McGurk took against our Kurdish allies – warning them
harshly against their peaceful independence referendum – had the effect of
convincing the Iranian-backed militias and the political leadership in Baghdad
that they had a green light to enter Kirkuk. In the words of former Ambassador
to Iraq Ryan Crocker, this criticism “may have emboldened Baghdad to take a
harsher posture than it otherwise would.”
For the last decade, I’ve briefed Army Generals H.R. McMaster (now President
Trump’s national security adviser), David Petreaus (who became CIA director) and
Army Chief of Staff Ray Odierno on the strong influence of Iran’s Revolutionary
Guards on Iraq’s security forces.
But for years, McGurk has been downplaying this influence.
On Oct. 1, a highly lethal roadside bomb called an explosively formed penetrator
(EFP) reappeared in Iraq after six years. It killed Army Spec. Alexander
Missildine and wounded another U.S. soldier. Its reappearance was a warning from
Iran: the Islamic Republic is prepared to begin killing Americans again. The EFP
is the signature weapon of two Revolutionary Guard-led militias in Iraq.
Scandalously, these militias receive paychecks and equipment from both the
U.S.-backed Iraqi Ministry of Interior and the Revolutionary Guards Quds Force.
It’s Brett McGurk’s responsibility to provide that information to the president
and Congress, because it’s a violation of the Leahy Law. That law was enacted to
keep U.S. funds and equipment from security forces involved in human rights
violations. Qassem Soleimani is smiling.
If President Trump wants to push back against Iran he should do so in the
Kurdish areas of Iraq. This is where he can stop Iran from creating its highly
coveted land bridge through Iraq and from eventually controlling northern Iraq
as well. Stopping Iran here would save lives, save alliances and give
credibility to America’s commitment to our allies. We can do that by working
with our only authentic allies in the region, the Kurds.
Our Kurdish allies need strong American support and our Iranian enemies need to
know we are serious about them and serious about supporting our friends.
**Michael Pregent was an embedded adviser to the Peshmerga in Mosul and an
intelligence and policy adviser to Generals Petraeus and Odierno on Iranian
activities in Iraq. He served 20 years as an intelligence officer in the Army
and seven years with the Defense
The Case for Assyrian Independence/Oasis of Peace in the Middle East/قضية
الإستقلال للأشوريين
Amir George//Gatestone Institute/October 22/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=59685
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11136/assyrian-independence
It is a solution to the refugee problem after centuries of persecution. Not only
could Assyrian Christian refugees stay where they were, but as Jews did in
Israel, they could come "home".
In the rush to condemn the liberation of Iraq as a mistake, we forget the terror
that Saddam Hussein and his two sons inflicted on their people. A visit to
nearly every home in Iraq will have a picture of one or more family members
among the nearly one million slaughtered by Saddam.
For the Assyrian Christians, this promise of Isaiah 19:23-25 is twofold. First,
that "in that day" they will finally have their nation, called Assyria. Second,
that their allies will be Israel and Egypt.
Nearly six million Assyrian Christians dot the world.
In 2003, according to the Iraqi government, there were 2.5 million Assyrian
Christians in the country, or 10% of the population. Another approximately 3.5
million are scattered from Australia to Europe to Lebanon, Jordan, the US and
more.
The Assyrian Christians -- descendants of the Assyrian Empire and the first
nation to accept Christ -- are the indigenous people of Iraq.
In spite of being one of the oldest civilizations, and even today speaking
Aramaic, the language Jesus spoke, they are refugees in their own homeland.
Following the recent move towards independence by the Kurdistan Regional
Government, the Assyrian Christian organizations worldwide have organized
formally to request, in accordance with Iraq's constitution, their own area in
their homeland in northern Iraq, on the Nineveh Plain.
In the wake of the "Biden Plan", put forth by former Senate Foreign Relations
Committee Chair, and then Vice President Joe Biden, the Assyrian Christian area
is one of the four areas envisioned as the only long-term solution for Iraq.
According to the plan, Kurdistan, Assyria, Sunnistan and Shiastan -- the four
dramatically different areas of Iraq -- would each be able to evolve into their
own areas.
While the Arab areas of Sunnistan and Shiastan in Iraq operate as do most Arab
countries -- with corruption, terror and civil strife -- the non-Arab regions of
Iraq, Kurdistan and Assyria in the north are shining examples of what all of
Iraq could be, and a testimony to the sacrifice of 4,888 brave Americans who
gave their lives for a liberated Iraq, as well as the 35,000 injured and the 2.5
million who served.
In the rush to condemn the liberation of Iraq as a mistake, we forget the terror
that Saddam Hussein and his two sons inflicted on their people. A visit to
nearly every home in Iraqi will have a picture of one or more family members
among the nearly one million slaughtered by Saddam.
For the Assyrian Christians, the move toward the independence of Kurdistan is
their encouragement to move forward with their independence as well.
Isaiah 19:23-25 is the promise that all Assyrian Christians, the first Christian
nation, hold onto as their promise for their homeland:
"In that day shall there be a highway out of Egypt to Assyria, and the Assyrian
shall come into Egypt, and the Egyptian into Assyria, and the Egyptians shall
serve with the Assyrians.
"In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt and with Assyria, even a
blessing in the midst of the land:
"Whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, saying, Blessed be Egypt my people, and
Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel mine inheritance."
For the Assyrian Christians, this promise of Isaiah 19:23-25 is twofold. First,
that "in that day" they will finally have their nation, called Assyria. Second,
that their allies will be Israel and Egypt.
Assyrian Independence, as with Kurdish Independence, would provide two wonderful
solutions to the longstanding instability in the Middle East.
First, it would provide a homeland to the Assyrian Christians and people who
scattered all over the world do not want to be refugees and go to Australia,
Europe, and the US, but simply want to live in their homeland.
It is a solution to the refugee problem after centuries of persecution. Not only
could Assyrian Christian refugees stay where they were, but as Jews did in
Israel, they could come "home".
Second, we owe it to the brave 4,888 Americans who died, the 35,000 who were
injured and the 2.5 million who were ready to sacrifice their lives in Iraq so
it could be free.
While the Arab part of Iraq is, like other Arab nations, an ongoing disaster, at
least the northern third of Iraq, comprising Assyria and Kurdistan, is on its
way to being another "shining city on a hill" in the Middle East -- an example,
a source of hope and blessing to an area with so little.
For the allies of both nearby Israel and Egypt, the prophecy of Isaiah 19 could
be a solution to at least part of the crises in the Middle East, as the non-Arab
people there work together to bring the region back from the brink.
Today, Kurdistan. Next, Assyria!
Picture enclosed
**Assyrian Christian priest Charbel Aesso leads an Easter service at Saint
John's Church (Mar Yohanna) in the predominantly Christian Iraqi town of
Qaraqosh on April 16, 2017 near Mosul, Iraq. (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)
**Amir George, an Assyrian Christian, is the author of "Liberating Iraq - The
Story of the Assyrian Christians of Iraq".
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
"Czech Donald Trump" Wins Landslide Victory/"I am ready to
fight for our national interests."
Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/October 22/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11208/czech-election-babis-victory
The election outcome, the result of popular discontent with established parties,
is the latest in a recent wave of successes for European populists, including in
Austria and Germany. The populist ascendancy highlights a shifting political
landscape in Europe where runaway multiculturalism and political correctness,
combined with a massive influx of unassimilable migrants from Africa, Asia and
the Middle East, have given rise to a surge in support for anti-establishment
protest parties.
"It is unthinkable that the indigenous European population should adapt
themselves to the refugees. We must do away with such nonsensical political
correctness. The refugees should behave like guests, that is, they should be
polite, and they certainly do not have the right to choose what they want to
eat.... There is a deep chasm between what people think and what the media tell
them." — Andrej Babis, in the Czech daily Pravo, January 16, 2016.
As prime minister, Babis would share government with Czech President Milos Zeman,
who has described political correctness as "a euphemism for political
cowardice."
Populist tycoon Andrej Babis and his Eurosceptic political party have won the
Czech Republic's parliamentary election — by a landslide — making the
"politically incorrect" billionaire businessman the main contender to become
prime minister after coalition negotiations.
With all of the votes counted, Babis's anti-establishment party ANO (which
stands for "Action of Dissatisfied Citizens" and is also the Czech word for
"yes") won nearly 30% — almost three times its closest rival — in elections held
on October 20. The Eurosceptic Civic Democratic Party (ODS), the
anti-establishment Czech Pirates Party and the anti-EU Freedom and Direct
Democracy party (SPD) came second, third and fourth, with around 11% each.
The Communists came in fifth with 7.8%. The Social Democrats, the center-left
establishment party that finished first in the previous election, came in sixth
with just 7.2%. The Christian Democrats, the center-right establishment party,
won 5.8%, just enough to qualify for seats in parliament. In all, nine parties
competed in the election.
The election outcome, the result of popular discontent with established parties,
is the latest in a recent wave of successes for European populists, including in
Austria and Germany. The populist ascendancy highlights a shifting political
landscape in Europe where runaway multiculturalism and political correctness,
combined with a massive influx of unassimilable migrants from Africa, Asia and
the Middle East, have given rise to a surge in support for anti-establishment
protest parties.
Babis's victory will also strengthen the role of the Visegrad Group (V4), a
political alliance of four Central European states — the Czech Republic,
Hungary, Poland and Slovakia — committed not only to resisting mass migration,
but also to opposing the continued transference of national sovereignty to the
European Union. A stronger V4 will accentuate the divisions between the pro-EU
states of Western Europe and the increasingly Eurosceptic states of Central and
Eastern Europe. The European Union consequently will struggle to maintain an
outward semblance of unity.
In his victory speech at the ANO party headquarters, Babis, who campaigned as a
centrist, refused to speculate on the composition of a coalition government, but
said he wanted the cabinet to be set up as quickly as possible: "This is a huge
opportunity to change our country. I would like to assemble a government that
will be of the people and for the people and promotes policies that are in their
favor."
Babis also tried to reassure the public that he would not put the Czech Republic
on the path to authoritarianism, as some of his detractors have charged:
"We are a democratic movement. We are a solid part of the European Union and we
are a solid part of NATO. I do not understand why some people say we are a
threat to democracy. We certainly are not a threat to democracy. I am ready to
fight for our national interests and to promote them."
Babis has been sharply critical of German Chancellor Angela Merkel's open-door
migration policy and has repeatedly denounced EU-imposed migrant quotas and
other "EU meddling" in Czech politics. Those positions resonate in the Czech
Republic, where citizens have the second-lowest trust in the European Union of
all 28 member states (only Greeks have less trust in the EU), according to the
latest Eurobarometer poll, published in August.
During the campaign, the 63-year-old Babis, one of the country's wealthiest
people, presented himself as a non-ideological results-oriented reformer. He
pledged to run the Czech Republic like a business after years of what he called
corrupt and inept management. He demanded a return of sovereignty from the
European Union and rejected Czech adoption of the euro single currency. He has
also promised to cut government spending, stop people from "being parasites" in
the social welfare system, and fight for Czech interests abroad. Babis is often
referred to as "the Czech Donald Trump."
Populist tycoon Andrej Babis (pictured) and his Eurosceptic political party have
won the Czech Republic's parliamentary election, making Babis the main contender
to become prime minister after coalition negotiations.
Babis does not want the Czech Republic to leave the EU; he has repeatedly
stressed that unimpeded access to the European single market is essential to
maintaining the health of the Czech economy, which has the lowest unemployment
rate in the EU: "We have six thousand German companies here, investing with us
and employing people."
At the same time, Babis is opposed to the country adopting the euro because
doing so would, he believes, constrain national sovereignty and competitiveness:
"No euro. I don't want the euro. We don't want the euro here. Everybody knows
it's bankrupt. It's about our sovereignty. I want the Czech koruna, and an
independent central bank. I don't want another issue that Brussels would be
meddling with."
Babis has pledged to reform the European Union from within, especially regarding
migration policy: "I want to play a more important role in Europe. But we have
to fight for our interests and make proposals. If I were a prime minister, I
would say: 'Close this cursed external European border at last.'"
Babis has expressed his opposition to mass migration: "I have stopped believing
in successful integration and multiculturalism." He has also insisted that the
Czech Republic alone should decide who will work in the country and who will
receive humanitarian aid: "I do not want to have a French or German migration
policy; we want our migration policy to be completely different from other
countries. Every state has some interests, we have to fight for Czech national
interests, we do not want to have that multicultural model."
Babis has rejected pressure from the European Commission, which has launched
infringement procedures against the Czechs, Hungarians and Poles for refusing to
comply with an EU plan to redistribute migrants:
"I will not accept refugee quotas for the Czech Republic. The situation has
changed. We see how migrants react in Europe. We must react to the needs and
fears of the citizens of our country. We must guarantee the security of Czech
citizens. Even if we are punished by sanctions."
In June 2017, Babis reiterated that the Czech Republic would not be taking
orders from unelected bureaucrats in Brussels:
"We have to fight for what our ancestors built here. If there will be more
Muslims than Belgians in Brussels, that's their problem. I don't want that here.
They won't be telling us who should live here."
In an interview with the Czech daily Pravo, Babis said:
"It is unthinkable that the indigenous European population should adapt
themselves to the refugees. We must do away with such nonsensical political
correctness. The refugees should behave like guests, that is, they should be
polite, and they certainly do not have the right to choose what they want to
eat. Europe and Germany in particular are undergoing an identity crisis. There
is a deep chasm between what people think and what the media tell them."
As prime minister, Babis would share government with Czech President Milos Zeman,
who has described political correctness as "a euphemism for political
cowardice." In an interview with the Guardian, the 71-year-old Zeman recounted a
recent conversation with Angela Merkel: "My first sentence in the meeting with
Madam Chancellor was: 'If you invite somebody to your homeland, you do not send
them to have lunch at your neighbors.'"
In an interview with Czech Radio, Zeman, who has called mass migration to Europe
an "organized invasion," said: "The Muslim Brotherhood cannot start a war
against Europe, it doesn't have the power, but it can prepare a growing migrant
wave and gradually control Europe."
Like Babis, Zeman has also expressed skepticism about Muslim integration: "The
experience of Western European countries which have ghettos and excluded
localities shows that the integration of the Muslim community is practically
impossible."
**Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
The Iran Deal: The Dog's Dinner Obama Dished Out
Amir Taheri/Gatestone Institute/October 22/2017
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11206/iran-deal-dog-dinner
"Trump violates international treaty!" "Trump tears up pact signed by world
powers!"
These were some of the headlines that pretended to report US President Donald
Trump's move on the "Iran nuclear deal" last week. Some in the Western media
even claimed that the move would complicate the task of curbing North Korea as
Pyongyang might conclude that reaching any deal with the world powers, as Iran
did, is useless.
But what is it exactly that Trump has done?
Before answering that question let's deal with another question. Is Obama's Iran
"deal" a treaty?
The answer is: no.
It is, as Tehran says, "a roadmap" in which Iran promises to take some steps in
exchange for "big powers" reciprocating by taking some steps of their own.
Even then, the "roadmap" or "wish-list" as former US Secretary of State John
Kerry described it, does not have an authoritative text; it comes in five
different versions, three in Persian and two in English, with many differences.
The "wish-list" hasn't been signed by anyone.
Nor has it been submitted, let alone approved, by the legislative organs of any
of the countries involved.
The various texts do not envisage any arbitration mechanism to decide whether or
not it has been implemented. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),
which was not involved in shaping the deal, is charged with the task of
assessing and, if possible, certifying, Iranian compliance. But there is no
mechanism for assessing and certifying whether other participants have done what
they are supposed to do.
Legally speaking, the so-called deal doesn't exist and thus cannot be "torn up"
by anybody.
The trouble with the "deal" starts with its genesis.
Jack Straw, a former British Foreign Secretary and an ardent supporter of Iran,
had told me that the idea began at a meeting in his official residence in London
with then US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. At that time the IAEA had
established that Iran had violated the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT)
and had asked the UN Security Council (UNSC) to take action. The UNSC had passed
resolutions that Iran had rejected because the mullahs didn't want to appear to
be repeating Saddam Hussein's "mistake" of walking into "UN resolutions trap."
Straw came up with the idea of creating an ad hoc group to work out a deal with
Tehran, by-passing the IAEA and the Security Council, thus flattering the
mullahs that they were given special treatment because their regime was special.
It seems that Rice was receptive and initiated a "bold move" by inviting then
secretary of Iran's High Council of National Security Ali Ardeshir, alias
Larijani, to Washington exactly at the time that Straw was about to leave
office.
Over 100 US visas were issued for Larijani and his entourage. But Iran's
"Supreme Guide" vetoed the visit at the last minute.
When Barack Obama entered the White House, he revived the scheme and after
secret talks with Tehran in Oman, arranged by his Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton, he transformed the idea into a process.
Tehran felt that in Obama it had a friend in Washington.
And, Obama really went out of his way to woo and flatter the mullahs.
He created a parallel Security Council, composed of the five "veto" holding
powers plus Germany which was and remains Iran's principal trading partner.
The concoction, dubbed P5+1, was never given an official status.
It was not formally and legally appointed by anybody, had no written mission
statement, implied no legal commitment for members and was answerable to no one.
Tehran accepted the trick with its usual attitude of sulking pride.
Larijani's successor, Saeed Jalili, boasted that the Islamic Republic's "special
status" was recognized by "big powers", implying that such things as NPT or even
international law as a whole didn't apply to Iran.
Jalili proved a pain in the neck. He saw talks with the P5+1 as a mechanism for
Iran to suggest, if not dictate, the course of events on a global scale.
He was not ready to talk about Iran's nuclear cheating unless the P5+1 also
discussed Iran's plans for a range of international problems. In one meeting,
Jalili displayed his "package" dealing with "problems that affect humanity",
from the environment to the "total withdrawal of the American Great Satan" from
the region.
Somewhere along the way, the European Union, encouraged by Britain and Germany,
hitch-hiked and secured a side-chair along the P5+1.
The idea was to use the EU foreign policy point-person as a punching bag against
Iranians who appeared unwilling to play. Thus, the P5+1 was enlarged into a
Group of 31, that is to say 28 EU members plus the US, China and Russia. (At one
point Brazil, Turkey and Kazakhstan also seemed to have won side-chairs with the
group but were quickly disembarked.)
Once Jalili was out of the picture, as the new Iranian President, Hassan Rouhani,
named his Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif as point-man, things began to
move fast.
During his long years in the US, part of it as diplomat in New York, Zarif had
established contacts with the Democratic Party, including John Kerry who took
over from Mrs. Clinton as Secretary of State. Zarif persuaded his bosses not to
miss "the golden opportunity" provided by Obama's administration which included
many "sympathizers" with Iran.
Then U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry talks with Iranian Foreign Minister
Javad Zarif on May 17, 2016 in Vienna, Austria. (Image source: U.S. State
Department)
Thus, in just two years what had proved impossible for 10 years became possible.
A vague text was established, fudging the issue, and declaring victory for both
sides. The participants in the game agreed to keep the text away from their
respective legislatures so as not to risk scrutiny of the witches' brew they had
cooked.
The so-called "deal" was dubbed a non-binding "roadmap", implying that the
"roadmap" isn't the same as the journey.
Two years after unveiling, the "roadmap" remains just that.
Neither Iran nor the G31 have delivered on their promises. Iran's path to
developing nuclear weapons remains open, although this doesn't mean that Tehran
is currently making a bomb. For their part, the G31 have not canceled the
sanctions imposed on Iran.
Both sides have lied to one another and to their respective audiences.
Obama has left a dog's dinner of diplomatic deception. Interestingly, Trump
hasn't thrown that dog's dinner into the dustbin and promises to rearrange and
improve it.
Is that possible?
Amir Taheri, formerly editor of Iran's premier newspaper, Kayhan, before the
Iranian revolution of 1979, is a prominent author based on Europe. He is the
Chairman of Gatestone Europe.
**This article first appeared in Asharq Al Awsat and is reprinted here with the
kind permission of the author.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Trump Excludes Iraq’s Popular Mobilization from his Iran
Strategy
Raghida Dergham/October 22/2017
Trump’s exclusion of Iraq from his enumeration of Iranian violations in the Arab
world and the IRGC roles there, in Syria, Yemen, and Lebanon, has interesting
implications. Iraq seems to occupy a special position for President Trump. The
prime minister in Baghdad, Haider al-Abadi, may have earned the trust of the US
president, and even a preferential position with regard to US support, possibly
at the expense of the Kurds, Washington’s erstwhile long-standing ally. Indeed,
Trump has overlooked the participation of the Popular Mobilization forces in
battles alongside the federal Iraqi forces to retake Kirkuk from the Kurds and
other Kurdish-claimed regions in northern Iraq, bearing in mind that the US
Treasury Department has now targeted the IRGC as a supporter of designated
groups and stepped its sanctions against Tehran’s elite force. Clearly, the
state of division within the Kurdish ranks, with accusations of betrayal and
treason, is a key factor that led to the current outcome in Iraqi Kurdistan.
Clearly too, the Trump administration was furious with Masoud Barzani for
rejecting a compromise deal to postpone the referendum for a year – which
Washington brokered as the best possible option and formalized through a UN
Security Council resolution – and decided to let him bear the consequences of
his mistakes alone. The situation in Iraq today indicates the presence of a
secret thread not only in Kurdistan but also across the rest of Iraq, where
Abadi’s ties to Iran and the PMF overlap with his relations with Saudi Arabia,
the UAE, and the Trump administration.
There is something curious about the Trump administration steering clear of
criticizing Abadi’s policies, to the extent of ignoring to place the PMF, which
are backed by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, within Iran’s violations. That
despite the fact that Qassem Soleimani continues to publicly tour all parts of
Iraq. There is something curious too about the shift taking place in Iraq’s
military and civilian ties with the Gulf, towards more normalization and
collaboration after a 25-year estrangement. Here, US and Gulf strategies in Iraq
overlap in a striking fashion, bearing in mind that Trump’s new strategy on Iran
has been welcomed in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and other Arab countries, though it
has caused concerns in countries that fear the repercussions of a renewed
US-Iranian clash, such as Lebanon.
Betting on Trump’s strategy carries risks, however. His announcements about Iran
and her adventures outside its borders needs to be coupled with mechanisms and
timetables, and a Plan B. The US president himself faces political risks if his
promises and pledges turn out to be impracticable.
For instance, it will not be easy to implement Donald Trump’s to delegitimize
the Iranian regime, as Trump characterized it deliberately in a departure from
the position of his predecessor Barack Obama, who legitimized the Iranian regime
from the UN General Assembly. Obama was meeting a key Iranian demand, and
implicitly pledging the US would not assist Iran’s opposition. But what can
Trump, who has suggested he would do the opposite, do to match his words with
deeds, not least because of his domestic woes?
Trump did not officially designate the IRGC as a terror organization, merely
announcing new sanctions. On the same day however the US Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated 11 entities and
individuals “for engaging in support of designated Iranian actors or malicious
cyber-enabled activity”, including arms of the IRGC, which "played a central
role to Iran becoming the world's foremost state sponsor of terror, according to
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. Trump and Mnuchin cited the Revolutionary
Guards’ support for Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime, as well as Hezbollah
in Lebanon and Hamas in the Palestinian territories, as grounds for the
sanctions.
What will Trump do in the event of an Iranian backlash against his targeting of
a key political and military arm of the regime in Tehran? Does he have a
comprehensive plan and concrete steps for how to target the IRGC, which is
overtly active, in addition to Iran, in Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, and Iraq, where
the group and its proxies are capturing territories liberated by the US-led
anti-ISIS coalition? The answer is not clear. There is a kind of contradiction
between the verbal pledges of the administration and what is taking place on the
ground. Former President Obama had empowered the IRGC in part through the
international resolutions that accompanied the nuclear deal. And President Trump
inherited a stronger and toothier IRGC.
According to senior figures in the Trump administration, the Treasury Department
will trim the wings of the IRGC and its supporters through expanded sanctions
based on its support for terrorism, and this will claw back some of what Obama
had conceded as a byproduct of the nuclear agreement. Obama had accepted to
unlock Iranian assets in advance of the implementation of the deal even though
he knew the IRGC would be the key beneficiary of the windfall, and agreed to
suspend UN resolutions prohibiting Iran from sending troops or proxies outside
its borders.
Now, Donald Trump believes he can reverse this through measures like the ones
included in his new strategy. But does that mean he could support local
opposition and regional actors to enlist in that effort, and is it not too late
for this, especially in Syria? The US president may have some answers to this,
but he has not revealed them yet. The new strategy may have been developed while
bearing in mind that the political game could require its instruments to be kept
hidden.
This week, US envoy to the UN Nikki Haley called for holding Iran accountable
for violating a number of resolutions that do not just concern the nuclear deal
and the ballistic missile program, but also the fact that it has sent weapons to
Yemen, Syria, and Lebanon, and that Qassem Soleimani has flouted the
internationally imposed travel ban.
Haley said Resolution 2231 bans the transfer of conventional weapons from Iran.
“Yet today we see Iran identified as a source of weapons in conflicts across the
region, from Yemen to Syria and Lebanon”. “The Iranian regime has been a key
source of arms and strategic military support to the Houthi rebels, both
directly, through its military, and indirectly, through its Hezbollah proxy
forces. Not only is this a violation of Resolution 2231, it also violates
Resolution 2216, which imposes an arms embargo on the Houthi rebels. Iran has
repeatedly and brazenly violated not one but two UN Security Council resolutions
in Yemen.”
Today, among the strongest opponents of new US attitudes on Iran are the
European allies, who want to hold on to the nuclear deal without reforming it,
but they do not admit that they were Obama’s accomplices in empowering the IRGC
across the spectrum. Yet, this continuation of their opposition will depend on
how serious the Trump administration will be beyond verbal pledges. For the time
being, all sides are in the same trench with regard to Iraq, where all
indications suggest the international community is ready to celebrate victory
against IS, while nodding in sympathy for the Kurdish self-inflicted reversal of
statehood dreams, and being ready to support Prime Minister Abadi while turning
a blind eye to Iran’s involvement in Iraq. Until further notice at least.
This in and of itself places immense responsibilities on the shoulders of Haider
al-Abadi – who acts as if he gives the orders to the PMF to withdraw from the
northern cities recaptured by the federal army from the Kurds led by oil-rich
Kirkuk, and that the PMF obeys his orders. But if Abadi falters before the
formidable PMF, Iran will be ultimately be the victorious party. It won’t be
easy for Abadi not to falter, because Iran will not willingly abandon the Iraqi
pie.
The Trump administration has omitted to mention the PMF or Iraq to preserve the
priority of defeating ISIS. It has abandoned the Kurds and converged with
Tehran, Baghdad, and Ankara over the referendum, to the dismay of Erbil. Today,
the Trump administration is tacitly supporting the military measures taken by
Abadi to retake Kirkuk, because the Trump administration and some Gulf countries
believe Iraq could be reclaimed from Iran’s sphere of influence by supporting a
strong central government under Abadi’s leadership.
It is too early to wager on the weakness of the PMF, the IRGC, or Hezbollah. The
clear loser in Iraq now are the Kurds, who overplayed their hands and overrelied
on allies, led by the US primarily, and Iran and Israel sometimes. Everyone has
now forsaken them. Worst of all is that the Kurds are their own worst enemy. It
is unfortunate that all these events were triggered because a people decided to
determine their own fate through a vote, but their dream was subsequently
frustrated by regional and international players, but most of all, by a stubborn
miscalculation that could have chosen a better time.
Dangers of refusing to link the Iran Deal to Tehran’s
behavior
Eyad Abu Shakra/Al Arabiya/October 22/17
“What is negotiation but the accumulation of small lies leading to
advantage?”(Felix Dennis)
It was a nail-biting moment for many as they waited for President Donald Trump
to announce his position on “certifying” the nuclear agreement between major
Western powers (plus Russia and China) and Iran; officially known as the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Although many leaks and announcements
about Trump’s position proved to be true, it was so important that it drew
immediate responses.
In the Middle East, the region most directly concerned about Iran’s nuclear
plans, contrast in reactions could not have been greater. While Iranian
President Hassan Rouhani angrily condemned Trump’s position widespread applause
came from Arab countries disadvantaged not only by Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but
also its political exploitation of the international community’s silence towards
it.
It is the silence that has allowed Iran to conquer and expand in the Region,
thanks to its militias and conventional weapons.
Indeed, in the Middle East, specifically in the Gulf area, there are two serious
threats posed by Iran’s ambitions for hegemony, including the nuclear agreement.
The first is political, the second is nuclear.
The political threat is for all to see in the armed sectarian agitation, aided
and sponsored by Tehran, whether through geographically dominant militias such
as the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) in Iraq, ‘Fatemiyyoun’, ‘Zaynabiyyoun’
and Hezbollah militias in Syria and Lebanon, and the Houthis in Yemen; or
through gangs involved in terrorism and clandestine activities as the ones we
hear about in Bahrain, other Gulf states, and North African countries.
Sure enough, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), which plays a vital
role in Iran’s political, security and economic life, continuously highlights
its interventions and has openly boasted its ‘control of four Arab capitals’.
Moreover, Qassem Suleimani, the Commander of the ‘Quds Brigade’ of the IRGC,
never misses an opportunity to appear inspecting the front lines in Iraq and
Syria, although he is supposed to be ‘wanted’ and chased by the international
community as a terrorist suspect!
As for the nuclear threat, it is no less dangerous from a purely scientific
viewpoint.
It has a geological-seismic dimension that has adverse consequences on the
safety of the Gulf region; given the fact that Iran straddles highly unstable,
and thus, dangerous seismic faults. Furthermore, many Iranian nuclear reactors
and installations have been built in vulnerable earthquake fault lines; and if
we remember that only a short distance separates the port of Bushehr (home to
one the major installations) and the eastern shores of the Arabian Peninsula, we
may imagine what disaster may befall the whole region from any leakage like that
we witnessed in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011.
Of course, the governments of Germany, France and the UK have every right to
oppose or agree with Washington’s policies, but their insistence on defending
the nuclear deal with Iran is based, in a large part, on economic interests.
These governments, spurred by German, French and British companies and banks
eager to enter Iran’s market of 90 million customers, refuse to acknowledge the
link between the agreement and Iran’s harsh treatment of opposition at home, or
its aggressive interventions in neighboring Arab countries.
Causing problems
Indeed, Iran’s aggressive interventions have caused two major problems:
1- The refugee problem afflicting the countries of Western and Central Europe.
2- The problem of extremist terrorism under ‘Sunni’ Muslim slogans, provoked by
Iran’s ‘Shi’ite’ Muslim slogans.
According to reliable statistics, Iran’s exports to EU countries have risen by %
375 between 2016 and 2017, European companies have invested heavily in the
almost ‘virgin’ Iranian market, and there is rapid progress in banking
facilities that is running parallel with these investments.
Thus, the three European governments’ positions look no different from that of
Barack Obama’s administration which sponsored Tehran’s rehabilitation, accorded
it all kinds of excuses, and gambled on making it a regional ally. They, just
like the former US Democratic administration did before, are intentionally
separating between nuclear technology and political repercussions. The three
governments have ignored the fact that Iran’s lies second the World (after
China) in the number of executions and first relative to population; and that
many of these are of a political nature, mostly targeting ethnic and sectarian
minorities.
Furthermore, the three governments, while claiming to defend human rights, have
done nothing with regard to Tehran’s maltreatment of figures that were part of
its regime’s elite like ex-premier Mir-Hossein Mousavi, and former Speaker Mehdi
Karroubi, not to mention the first president of ‘The Islamic Republic’
Abolhassan Banisadr, still living in exile in France!
Berlin, Paris and London, which are repeating Obama’s same excuses that limit
Muslim terror to Sunnis, refuse to admit Tehran’s active role in aiding and
abetting even extremist Sunni Muslim groups worldwide, and co-operating with
them, including Al Qaeda.
The three governments want us to accept former US Secretary of State John
Kerry’s inverted logic when he stated, time and time again during the US-Iran
nuclear negotiations, that they solely touched on the nuclear side and never
included any “other issues”. It is the same “logic” that Kerry reiterated this
week as he criticized President Trump’s refusal to “certificate” the JCPOA while
taking a tough line too against the IRGC and its appendages after highlighting
their destructive role regionally and globally. As for the “other issues”
mentioned by Mr Kerry, and ignored then by the Obama administration, were Iran’s
political, military and intelligence interventions in Arab countries.
Finally, the three European governments which have always claimed the moral high
ground in welcoming refugees from the Middle East, could do better by adopting
the maxim “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”.
The ounce of prevention in this case, is simply, ridding the world of the evils
of extremism, destruction and hatred, all of which create and fuel terrorism.
___________________________
Eyad Abu Shakra (also written as Ayad Abou-Chakra) began his media career in
1973 with Annahar newspaper in Lebanon. He joined Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper in
the UK in 1979, occupying several positions including: Senior Editor, Managing
Editor, and Head of Research Unit, as well as being a regular columnist. He has
several published works, including books, chapters in edited books, and
specialized articles, in addition to frequent regular TV and radio appearances.
Eyad tweets @eyad1949.