LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS
BULLETIN
June 26/17
Compiled &
Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The
Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias/english.june26.17.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily
English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2016
Bible Quotations For Today
The faith of the Samaritan that was put in action when he
helped the injured man on Jericho's road
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 10/25-37/:"Just then a
lawyer stood up to test Jesus. ‘Teacher,’ he said, ‘what must I do to inherit
eternal life?’He said to him, ‘What is written in the law? What do you read
there?’He answered, ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and
with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your
neighbour as yourself.’And he said to him, ‘You have given the right answer; do
this, and you will live.’But wanting to justify himself, he asked Jesus, ‘And
who is my neighbour?’Jesus replied, ‘A man was going down from Jerusalem to
Jericho, and fell into the hands of robbers, who stripped him, beat him, and
went away, leaving him half dead. Now by chance a priest was going down that
road; and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. So likewise a Levite,
when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a
Samaritan while travelling came near him; and when he saw him, he was moved with
pity. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, having poured oil and wine on
them. Then he put him on his own animal, brought him to an inn, and took care of
him.
The next day he took out two denarii, gave them to the innkeeper, and said,
"Take care of him; and when I come back, I will repay you whatever more you
spend."Which of these three, do you think, was a neighbour to the man who fell
into the hands of the robbers?’He said, ‘The one who showed him mercy.’ Jesus
said to him, ‘Go and do likewise.’
Faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead
Letter of James 02/14-23/:"What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if you say
you have faith but do not have works? Can faith save you? If a brother or sister
is naked and lacks daily food, and one of you says to them, ‘Go in peace; keep
warm and eat your fill’, and yet you do not supply their bodily needs, what is
the good of that? So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead. But someone
will say, ‘You have faith and I have works.’ Show me your faith without works,
and I by my works will show you my faith. You believe that God is one; you do
well. Even the demons believe and shudder. Do you want to be shown, you
senseless person, that faith without works is barren?Was not our ancestor
Abraham justified by works when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see
that faith was active along with his works, and faith was brought to completion
by the works. Thus the scripture was fulfilled that says, ‘Abraham believed God,
and it was reckoned to him as righteousness’, and he was called the friend of
God.
Question: "How does God distribute
spiritual gifts?"
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=56537
*GotQuestions.org/Answer: Romans 12:3-8 and 1 Corinthians chapter 12 make it
clear that each Christian is given spiritual gifts according to the Lord’s
choice. Spiritual gifts are given for the edification of the body of Christ (1
Corinthians 12:7, 14:12). The exact timing of the giving of these gifts is not
specifically mentioned. Most assume that spiritual gifts are given at the time
of spiritual birth (the moment of salvation). However, there are some verses
that may indicate God gives spiritual gifts later as well. Both 1 Timothy 4:14
and 2 Timothy 1:6 refer to a gift that Timothy had received at the time of his
ordination “by prophecy.” This likely indicates that one of the elders at
Timothy’s ordination spoke about a spiritual gift that Timothy would have to
enable his future ministry.
We are also told in 1 Corinthians 12:28-31 and in 1 Corinthians 14:12-13 that it
is God (not us) who chooses the gifts. These passages also indicate that not
everyone will have a particular gift. Paul tells the Corinthian believers that
if they are going to covet or long after spiritual gifts, they should strive
after the more edifying gifts, such as prophesying (speaking forth the word of
God for the building up of others). Now, why would Paul tell them to strongly
desire the “greater” gifts if they already had been given all they would be
given, and there was no further opportunity of gaining these greater gifts? It
may lead one to believe that even as Solomon sought wisdom from God in order to
be a good ruler over God’s people, so God will grant to us those gifts we need
in order to be of greater benefit to His church.
Having said this, it still remains that these gifts are distributed according to
God’s choosing, not our own. If every Corinthian strongly desired a particular
gift, such as prophesying, God would not give everyone that gift simply because
they strongly desired it. If He did, then who would serve in all of the other
functions of the body of Christ?
There is one thing that is abundantly clear—God’s command is God’s enablement.
If God commands us to do something (such as witness, love the unlovely, disciple
the nations, etc.), He will enable us to do it. Some may not be as gifted at
evangelism as others, but God commands all Christians to witness and disciple
(Matthew 28:18-20; Acts 1:8). We are all called to evangelize whether or not we
have the spiritual gift of evangelism. A determined Christian who strives to
learn the Word and develop his teaching ability may become a better teacher than
one who may have the spiritual gift of teaching, but who neglects the gift.
Are spiritual gifts given to us when we receive Christ, or are they cultivated
through our walk with God? The answer is both. Normally, spiritual gifts are
given at salvation, but also need to be cultivated through spiritual growth. Can
a desire in your heart be pursued and developed into your spiritual gift? Can
you seek after certain spiritual gifts? First Corinthians 12:31 seems to
indicate that this is possible: “earnestly desire the best gifts.” You can seek
a spiritual gift from God and be zealous after it by seeking to develop that
area. At the same time, if it is not God’s will, you will not receive a certain
spiritual gift no matter how strongly you seek after it. God is infinitely wise,
and He knows through which gifts you will be most productive for His kingdom.
No matter how much we have been gifted with one gift or another, we are all
called upon to develop a number of areas mentioned in the lists of spiritual
gifts: to be hospitable, to show acts of mercy, to serve one another, to
evangelize, etc. As we seek to serve God out of love for the purpose of building
up others for His glory, He will bring glory to His name, grow His church, and
reward us (1 Corinthians 3:5-8, 12:31–14:1). God promises that as we make Him
our delight, He will give us the desires of our heart (Psalm 37:4-5). This would
surely include preparing us to serve Him in a way that will bring us purpose and
satisfaction.
Titles For Latest LCCC
Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on June
25-26/17
Will the situation on the Golan suck Israel
into the Syrian Civil War/Ben Lynfield/Jerusalem Post/June 25/17
What Sharia Prescribes: Same as the Ten Commandments/Nonie Darwish/Gatestone
Institute/June 25/17
Most Want Person Terror List/Hakim Haider/Gatestone Institute/June 25/17
Egyptian TV Host Youssef Al-Husseini Following London Mosque Attack: The Muslims
Have Contributed Nothing But Terror, So Why Do You Expect Them to Love You/MEMRI
TV/June 25/17
Central Europe’s Tough Choice: Macron or Orban/Ivan Krastev/The New York
Times/June 25/17
Remember the Population Bomb? It’s Still Ticking/Eugene Linden/The New York
Times/June 25/17
Al-Jazeera and the Muslim Brotherhood/Eli Lake/Bloomberg/June 25/17
The political and administrative Prince Mohammed bin Salman/Turki Aldakhil/Al
Arabiya/June 25/17
In hate crimes against Muslims, focus less on media, more on prosecution/Yara
al-Wazir/Al Arabiya/June 25/17
Gulf Crisis with Qatar Challenges the United States/Simon Henderson/The
Washington Institute/June 25/17
Preparing to Counter ISIS 2.0: European CT Efforts Since Charlie Hebdo/Gilles de
Kerchove/The Washington Institute/June 25/17
Defusing the Electricity Crisis in Gaza -- For Now/Katherine Bauer and Ghaith
al-Omari//The Washington Institute/June 25/17
Titles For Latest
Lebanese Related News published on
June 25-26/17
Aoun Hopes Eid Brings Peace to Levant, Prosperity
to Lebanese
President Michel Aoun extends Eid al-Fitr greetings to Lebanese
Hariri Meets Saudi Crown Prince, Performs Eid Prayer with King
Rai from Portugal: Lebanon is characterized by its system of openness to
pluralism
Derian receives Eid wellwishers, including LF delegation headed by Adwan at Dar
El Fatwa
Daryan in Eid Sermon: Muslims in Lebanon are with KSA under All Circumstances
Khalil says period entails that all engage in workshop to protect homeland
Geagea extends Eid well wishes to Lebanese and Muslims all over the world
Lebanese Forces Leader: Opening Lebanese Border Is not Anyone’s Choice
Moussawi: Resistance, Like Israel, Has Right to Rally Its Allies
Riachi Distances Govt. from Nasrallah Remarks, Hamadeh Laments Rhetoric
Jumblatt Restores Relations With Russia
Titles For Latest
LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
June 25-26/17
Israel Hits Syria Army after Errant Fire Lands in Golan for 2nd Day
Assad leads Eid prayers in rare appearance outside Damascus
Car Hits Muslims Celebrating Eid in UK, 6 Hurt
Car Bomb in Syria’s Idlib Province Kills 10
Trump Administration Considering Arab-US Summit to Solve Qatar Crisis
Turkey’s Erdogan backs Qatar’s response to list of Arab demands
Turkey’s Erdogan says fine after feeling unwell in prayers
UAE President in First Appearance since 2014 Stroke
Bahrain officially publishes list of demands conveyed to Qatar
Saudi Crown Prince to al-Azhar Sheikh: We Count on Religious Institutions in
Countering Extremism
Iraqi Forces Evacuate Hundreds of Civilians amid Clashes in Mosul’s Old City
Iran mocks reports its Syria missile strikes fell short
Egypt’s Sisi Ratifies Maritime Border Deal with Saudi Arabia
Russia, Kazakhstan Stress Need to Continue Geneva, Astana Paths
Syrian Opposition Attacks Quneitra with Advanced Weapons
Netanyahu warns Iran over Syria involvement after Golan exchange
UAE’s Gargash: Diplomacy Is Priority in Dealing with Qatar Crisis, Alternative
is ‘Parting of Ways’
Latest Lebanese
Related News published on
June 25-26/17
Aoun Hopes Eid Brings Peace to Levant, Prosperity to
Lebanese
Naharnet/June 25/17/President Michel Aoun on Sunday extended Eid
al-Fitr greetings to the Lebanese, hoping that they will be able to “achieve
their aspirations.”In a tweet on his personal account, Aoun also hoped Eid will
“restore the safety and peace of our Levant.”The president had sent cables of
greetings to the leaders of the Arab and Muslim countries, wishing them
prosperity, peace and progress. He has also received greeting cables from a
number of Arab and Muslim leaders.
President Michel Aoun extends Eid al-Fitr greetings to
Lebanese
The Daily Star/June 25, 2017/ "Every eid has joy, and joy carries hope," Aoun
said in a post on Twitter. "We ask God for a Eid al-Ftir that will give the
Lebanese their hope..."The president also wished for security and peace. A
statement from Aoun's press office added that he extended his greetings to
leaders across Arab and Muslim countries. Meanwhile on Friday, a statement from
the Parliament's media office said that Speaker Nabih Berri will not be
accepting Eid al-Fitr greetings this year in view of the crises engulfing Arab
countries. June 25 marks the first day of Eid al-Fitr. Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul
Latif Derian will lead Eid al-Fitr prayers and deliver a speech at 6:15 a.m. at
the Mohammad al-Amine Mosque in Downtown Beirut. Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Latif
Derian will lead Eid al-Fitr prayers and deliver a speech at 6:15 a.m. at the
Mohammad al-Amine Mosque in Downtown Beirut.
Hariri Meets Saudi Crown Prince, Performs Eid Prayer with
King
Naharnet/June 25/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri held talks Sunday in Jeddah with
newly-appointed Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Hariri congratulated the
young crown prince on his new post and they discussed the Lebanese-Saudi
relations and the situation in the region in general, Hariri's press office
said. The premier had earlier performed the Eid al-Fitr prayer in the morning
alongside Saudi King Salman bin Abdul Aziz in Mecca, in the presence of Yemeni
President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, former Maldives president Mohammed Wahid and
a large number of Saudi princes and officials as well as a large crowd of
worshipers. After the prayer, King Salman received Hariri for breakfast at the
Safa Palace in Mecca, alongside Hadi, Wahid and a number of Saudi princes,
scholars, ministers and senior officials. In a video message marking Eid, Hariri
extended greetings to Lebanese expats around the world and said the political
parties have “approved a new electoral law and agreed to activate the
government's work” so that “expats can return to Lebanon” and so that “the
Lebanese can live in dignity in their country.”
Rai from Portugal: Lebanon is characterized by its system
of openness to pluralism
Sun 25 Jun 2017/NNA - Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Bshara Butros al-Rai deemed
that Lebanon's significance lies in its open system of cultural and religious
pluralism within a framework of cooperation, integration and mutual enrichment,
away from exclusivity in power or obliteratiion of the identity of any of its
social and national components. Speaking during Sunday Mass at "Our Lady of
Fatima" in Portugal this afternoon, al-Rai hoped for stability in Lebanon "so
that it can preserve its mission, message and role model of coexistence between
religions and cultures." The Patriarch also prayed that the Middle East would
witness stability and cessation of wars, peaceful resolutions to all disputes,
the establishment of a just, comprehensive and lasting peace and the return of
all displaced and refugees to their homes and countries.
Derian receives Eid wellwishers, including LF delegation
headed by Adwan at Dar El Fatwa
Sun 25 Jun 2017/NNA - The Mufti of the Republic, Sheikh Abdel-Latif Derian,
received Sunday a delegation from the "Lebanese Forces" Party, chaired by MP
George Adwan, who visited him at Dar el-Fatwa marking the Fitr Feast. "We have
come, on behalf of the LF, to congratulate the Mufti, the Lebanese and our
Muslim partners on the occasion of Eid el-Fitr," Adwan said on emerging from the
meeting. "We share the celebrations, the joys and the problems. We are united
and determined to work together for the country's rise and wellbeing," he added.
Adwan lauded the Mufti's role in demonstrating the culture of tolerance and
peace since he took office, describing him as "a man of moderation and
patriotism." "The LF seeks to broaden the culture of moderation and coexistence
in our country," he added, noting that "through our unity, we can avoid the
repercussions of the difficult stage witnessed in the surrounding region,
leading our nation's boat to safety harbor." Among the Mufti's well-wishers on
the Eid occasion was also MP Ammar Houri representing Prime Minister Saad
Hariri, and Deputies Atef Majdalani, Mohammad Kabbani and Imad el-Hout, in
addition to a number of cabinet ministers and Arab ambassadors.
Daryan in Eid Sermon: Muslims in Lebanon are with KSA
under All Circumstances
Naharnet/June 25/17/Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Latif Daryan stressed Sunday that
Lebanon's Muslims will support Saudi Arabia under all circumstances, as he
strongly condemned what Riyadh has dubbed a foiled terrorist attempt to attack
Mecca's Grand Mosque – Islam's holiest site.
“The security of the Grand Mosque in the holy city of Mecca and the security of
the Prophet's Mosque in the holy city of Medina are a red line and we do not
tolerate any attempt to undermine their security and stability,” said Daryan in
his Eid al-Fitr sermon in Beirut. “The attempt to target the Grand Mosque is not
a normal crime and it is rather the mother of all crimes,” the mufti added.
“Muslims in Lebanon are with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia through thick and thin
and they are keen on its security the same as they are keen on their own
security,” Daryan went on to say. “We pray to God to protect KSA and its king,
government, people and army,” he said. Six foreign pilgrims and five security
personnel were hurt Friday near Mecca's Grand Mosque when a suicide bomber blew
himself up during a security raid. The incident happened around the Grand
Mosque, where hundreds of thousands of worshipers gathered for early afternoon
prayers on the last Friday of this year's Ramadan, the Muslim fasting month.
Turning to Lebanon, Daryan said “any political system cannot have credibility
without free and regular elections.”And noting that “Prime Minister Saad
Hariri's government is working seriously and honestly” for the sake of the
country, the mufti called on authorities to address the proliferation of arms
and to curb violent crime. The State should “strike with an iron fist,” he said,
urging it to “extend its authority across Lebanon.”
Khalil says period entails that all engage in workshop to
protect homeland
Sun 25 Jun 2017/NNA - Finance Minister Ali Hasan Khalil Sunday deemed that the
current phase imposes on everyone to engage in a workshop for preserving the
nation, and catering to the dire needs of Lebanese citizens in boosting their
security and stability at the economic, social and political levels. Speaking
during the week's memorial ceremony for the late Allamah Sheikh Mohamad Sbeity
in the Southern town of Kfarsir, Khalil reiterated adherence to the choice of
resistance in defending Lebanon's liberty and protecting it from surrounding
challenges. "After endorsing the election law, we moved from one political stage
to another in which Lebanon has overcome many dangers, especially at this phase
in which the region is experiencing rapid changes and challenges," added Khalil.
He considered that the adoption of the new electoral law would not have been
possible without the cooperation of all sides and their awareness of their
national responsibilities. Khalil called on the government to "complete all
procedures and requirements for the parliamentary elections, in accordance with
the dates set forth in the law."
Geagea extends Eid well wishes to Lebanese and Muslims all
over the world
Sun 25 Jun 2017/NNA - Lebanese Forces Party Leader, Samir Geagea, Sunday
congratulated via Twitter all the Lebanese and Muslims across the world on the
Fitr Feast, hoping that it would bring by better conditions of stability, safety
and tranquility. "Despite the tragedies witnessed in our region, we renew our
hope and determination in this holy Eid to overcome all trials and tribulations
to achieve the desired peace," he added.
Lebanese Forces Leader: Opening Lebanese Border Is not Anyone’s Choice
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17Beirut – Secretary-General of Lebanese Hezbollah Hasan
Nasrallah made recent statements hinting towards opening borders for foreign
fighters in case of new war with Israel. These statements were a blatant
defiance for the Lebanese government risking transforming Lebanon into a war
zone similar to the case of Syria. Lebanese Forces Leader Samir Geagea condemned
Nasrallah’s remarks reiterating that opening the Lebanese border is not up to
anyone. “It is not up to anybody to open Lebanese borders, even the Lebanese
Cabinet,” he said. Geagea questioned “if we want to defend our country in case
of an Israeli aggression, do we open the border and recruit thousands of
strangers as fighters, from unknown whereabouts, for them to occupy the country?
“In case of an Israeli aggression against Lebanon, it is clearly logical for the
Lebanese Army to face it aided with the other Lebanese armed forces and backed
by the Lebanese people,” Geagea stated. On Friday on the occasion of al-Quds
Day, Nasrallah warned Israel against attacking Lebanon or Syria, saying
“hundreds of thousands” of Arab and Muslim fighters would be ready to strike
back. “I’m not saying countries would intervene directly, but it would open the
door for hundreds of thousands of fighters from all around the Arab and Islamic
world to participate in this fight, from Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Afghanistan,
Pakistan,” Nasrallah said.
Director of Levant Institute for Strategic Affairs (LISA) Sami Nader said that
Iran is trying to expand its presence in response to the US-Russian agreement
spoken about in Syria. He stated that since the Syrian crisis, Iran is trying to
infiltrate into Golan Heights and enforce Israel into clashes.
Nader stressed that violating UN Resolution 1701 will cost Lebanon highly, and
that is why Hezbollah is trying to enforce a new plan against Israel over the
Syrian border. The director believes that Iran is ready to go into war until the
last Arab citizen, especially that it managed to reach to Syrian-Iraqi border
through the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF).
He added that engaging in a war with Israel in the Golan will grant Tehran
leverage in the regional game.Director of Umam Center for Documentation and
Research Luqman Salim ruled out the possibility of a war between Iran and
Hezbollah against Israel. He pointed out that both parties are just “flexing
their deterrent muscles”, but a war now is not within the best interest of
either of them. Regarding Nasrallah’s threats, Salim stated that this is a
dangerous issue which indicates that according to Nasrallah, Lebanon is just a
battlefield for wars in the name of Iran. He believes that the most dangerous
thing is that Hezbollah’s leader doesn’t believe he has partners in Lebanon.
“What Nasrallah said is a slap on the face of all of those who convened in
Baadba Palace,” Salim said.
Moussawi: Resistance, Like Israel, Has Right to Rally
Its Allies
Naharnet/June 25/17/Outspoken Hizbullah MP Nawwaf al-Moussawi on Sunday defended
the latest anti-Israel remarks by Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah,
stressing that Hizbullah has the right to invite its allies to take part in any
future war with Israel.
“The allies of the Zionist entity and the U.S. administration do not find any
harm in going beyond their geographic and political borders and their sovereign
rights to unite together in a 70-nation coalition aimed at waging aggression
against Syria, while over 30 nations have come together in order to wage
aggression against Yemen,” Moussawi said. “Thus it is normal for us, the
resistance factions in this region, to confront the anti-resistance axis,” the
Hizbullah lawmaker emphasized. “How can some parties raise their voice and ask
about the resistance's right to rally its allies in a confrontation that our
enemy has rallied all its allies in it. In Iraq, there is an alliance targeting
its sovereignty and in Syria there is an alliance that has targeted this
resisting nation, so it is normal for us to respond to these alliances that
comprise the U.S., Europe, the Zionist entity and the Saudi regime,” Moussawi
added. “The same as we fought in Syria together alongside the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard, the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces, the popular Syrian
forces and every Arab struggle fighter, we will fight together in Lebanon as a
unified front and alliance should the enemy wage an aggression against Lebanon,”
the MP warned.
He reminded the Lebanese that in the year 2006, they “did not only face the
Israeli enemy,” noting that Israel “was backed by the United States, Europe and
Arab regimes topped by Saudi Arabia.”
“The Britons opened their civilian airports for the transfer of the missiles and
bombs that were fired on us, because Israel had consumed its arsenal of missiles
on the tenth day of the war. Therefore, from day 10 to day 33 we were being
bombed with ammunition and bombs coming directly from the U.S. arsenal and other
paces,” Moussawi charged.
“We tell those who want to speak of Lebanon's sovereign rights that we are the
people who are most eligible to speak of sovereign rights, especially that the
American bases are violating the entire region and the Israeli warplanes are
bombing in Yemen,” the MP added.
“We are not alone anymore. Should the Israelis begin the battle, we will clearly
face it alongside all of our allies. Those who have any questions regarding
sovereignty and its requirements must tell us why the U.S. military aircraft are
landing in Lebanon on their way to the U.S. bases. Therefore, gone is the time
when some can lecture us with slogans that they themselves had violated when
they sought the enemy's help to alter the situation in Lebanon in 1982,”
Moussawi went on to say, in an apparent jab at Lebanese Forces leader Samir
Geagea.
“We were the ones resisting the enemy,” the MP added.
On Friday, Nasrallah had warned Israel against attacking Lebanon or Syria,
saying "hundreds of thousands" of Arab and Muslim fighters would be ready to
strike back.
"The Israeli enemy should know that if it launches an attack on Syria or
Lebanon, it's unknown whether the fighting will stay just between Lebanon and
Israel, or Syria and Israel," Nasrallah said.
"I'm not saying countries would intervene directly -- but it would open the door
for hundreds of thousands of fighters from all around the Arab and Islamic world
to participate in this fight -- from Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan,"
he added.
Hizbullah fighters from Lebanon, and others from Iran, Iraq, Pakistan and
Afghanistan, are battling alongside regime forces in Syria to defend the
government of President Bashar al-Assad.
The powerful Lebanese, Iran-backed group and Israel have fought many battles
including a devastating 34-day war in 2006 that killed 1,200 people in Lebanon,
mainly civilians, and 160 Israelis, mostly soldiers. Border skirmishes have
broken out occasionally since then, and Nasrallah on Friday said any future
confrontation would be "very costly for Israel." Tensions were rising this week
along the frontier, with Israel accusing Hizbullah of expanding observation
posts to conduct reconnaissance missions across the border. Israel's ambassador
to the United Nations, Danny Danon, denounced the "dangerous provocation" and
sent a letter of protest to the Security Council. And the head of Israel's air
force said it would have "unimaginable" military power at hand in any future
conflict with Hizbullah.
"What the air force was able to do quantitatively in the... Lebanon war over the
course of 34 days we can do today in 48-60 hours," Major General Amir Eshel said
on Wednesday.
Riachi Distances Govt. from Nasrallah Remarks, Hamadeh
Laments Rhetoric
Naharnet/June 25/17/Information Minister Melhem Riachi of the Lebanese Forces
has stressed that the latest anti-Saudi remarks by Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan
Nasrallah do not reflect the official stance of the Lebanese government. “This
is not the government's stance and certainly not the LF's stance. We do not
accept any dispute with the Saudi brothers and we do not want to interfere in
the affairs of the Arab countries, the same as we don't accept the interference
of others in our affairs,” Riachi said in remarks published by the Saudi-owned
newspaper al-Hayat. Lebanon should “dissociate itself from conflicts,” he
emphasized. Education Minister Marwan Hamadeh of MP Walid Jumblat's Democratic
Gathering meanwhile noted that Nasrallah's rhetoric “does not contribute to
pacifying the political atmosphere or boosting the economic atmosphere in the
relations with the Arab Gulf countries.”“It is like we are shooting ourselves in
the foot,” he added.
Jumblatt Restores Relations With Russia
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17/Beirut- Leader of Lebanon’s Progressive Socialist
Party (PSP) deputy Walid Jumblatt was received warmly in Moscow on Friday,
reflecting a great improvement in the relations between the two parties
following Jumblatt’s harsh positions against the Syrian regime and its president
Bashar al-Assad. The visit also revealed that Jumblatt was capable of restoring
relations with Moscow, through the same Syria crisis door, as he reiterated his
support for a political solution in Syria in which Moscow plays a role.
Jumblatt’s trip to Russia coincided with the Russian efforts to revive the
Syrian peace talks in Geneva and Moscow’s attempts to fortify a ceasefire deal
and demarcate the borders of the deescalation zones that would involve Deraa, a
Syrian province located near Suwayda, which includes a majority of Druze. The
PSP leader arrived Friday to Moscow where he separately met with Foreign
Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov. His
meeting with Lavrov was rather political, while Jumblatt said his meeting with
Bogdanov was of a “cordial nature.”The Druze leader had last met with the
Russian foreign minister about two years ago, which explains that Jumblatt’s
visit to Moscow this week has opened a new horizon of the relations between the
two sides. PSP spokesperson Rami al-Rayess told Asharq Al-Awsat that the
relation between Jumblatt and Russia is historic and was established since the
days of the Soviet Union, even if it has witnessed some differences in the
points of view. Rayess said that those differences were mainly related to the
Syrian crisis. “The vision concerning Syria might not be similar. But, this
doesn’t mean that Jumblatt fails to appreciate Moscow’s support for a political
solution in Syria,” a position he repeatedly expressed during his stay in
Russia. Rayess added that Jumblatt insists that a political solution achieved
through the Geneva talks is essential to end the bloody conflict in the war-torn
country.
Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
June 25-26/17
Israel Hits Syria Army after
Errant Fire Lands in Golan for 2nd Day
Naharnet/Associated Press/June
25/17/Israel launched airstrikes on Syrian army posts in Quneitra after several
projectiles fired from Syria landed in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights for a
second consecutive day. The Israeli army said the projectiles landed in an open
area and there were no injuries. It said they were the result of "errant" fire.
The Israeli army had on Saturday carried out a series of airstrikes in Syria in
response to similar fire. Israel has largely stayed out of the fighting during
the six-year civil war in neighboring Syria. But it has carried out a number of
strikes in response to errant fire spilling over into the Israeli side of the
Golan. It also is believed to have carried out airstrikes on suspected weapons
shipments to its archenemy Hizbullah, whose fighters are backing Syrian forces.
Assad leads Eid prayers in
rare appearance outside Damascus
Sun 25 Jun 2017/NNA - Syrian President Bashar al-Assad led Eid-ul-Fitr prayers
in the central city of Hama on Sunday, appearing in public outside the capital
for the first time in a year. Assad’s office published images of him praying
inside the brightly-lit Al-Nuri mosque at dawn on Sunday before greeting
worshippers outside. He was flanked by Islamic Endowments Minister Mohammad
Abdel-Sattar Sayyed and Syria’s top Muslim cleric Ahmad Badredine Hassoun.
Eid-ul-Fitr marks the end of the holy month of Ramadan, during which Muslims
fast from dawn until dusk. Ahead of the holiday, Syria’s government released
more than 670 detainees — including some children born to prisoners — from jails
around Damascus on Saturday. Assad’s last public appearance outside Damascus was
during Eid al-Fitr in July 2016, which he spent in third city Homs. Presidential
trips outside the capital have become rare since Syria’s conflict broke out more
than six years ago. Hama city is the capital of the governorate by the same
name, where Syrian government troops are battling jihadists and their rebel
allies. ---AFP
Car Hits Muslims
Celebrating Eid in UK, 6 Hurt
Associated Press/Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 25/17/British police on
Sunday said they arrested a woman after a car collided with pedestrians outside
a Newcastle sports center where Muslims were celebrating the Eid al-Fitr
holiday.Six people were injured and police said the incident is not believed to
be terror-related. Northumbria Police said officers are trying to determine what
happened outside Westgate Sports Center in the northern English city of
Newcastle on Sunday morning. The ambulance service said three children and three
adults were being treated at a local hospital for injuries sustained in the
crash. The police force said emergency services were at the scene and a
42-year-old woman has been arrested and is in police custody. One man was killed
last week when a van drove into a group of worshipers outside a mosque in north
London. A North East Ambulance Service spokesman said that they were contacted
at 9.15am (0815 GMT) to say that a car had mounted the kerb outside Westgate
Sports Center and hit a group of worshipers who had just attended Eid prayers.
Eyewitnesses said that one boy, aged around eight, "was really badly injured,"
according to the BBC.
Car Bomb in Syria’s Idlib Province Kills 10
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17/A car bomb killed 10 people in Syria’s rebel-held
Idlib province on Saturday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a
Britain-based war monitor, reported on Sunday. The UK-based Observatory said the
bombing targeted a market in the town of al-Dana, on the outskirts of Idlib.
There has been no claim of responsibility so far. However, a local opposition
source told DPA that “sleeper cells” linked to the ISIS group were behind the
bombing. Three people under 18 were among the dead and the blast also injured at
least 30 other people, it said. Another bombing in the town after midnight on
Friday killed two people, it added. Idlib province is a major stronghold of
rebels in Syria and is situated along the border with Turkey. The United Nations
and aid agencies have voiced concern about the humanitarian situation in Idlib,
where large numbers of people live in poor conditions and face aerial
bombardment. Syria’s civil war has lasted over six years, killed hundreds of
thousands of people, driven millions more from their homes in a global refugee
crisis and dragged in regional and world powers.
Trump Administration Considering Arab-US Summit to Solve
Qatar Crisis
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17/Washington – US President Donald Trump is considering
several scenarios to solve the Qatar crisis following three weeks of severed
diplomatic and economic relations with several Arab countries who accused Doha
of funding terrorism and fomenting unrest. Trump might call for a Camp
David-style summit to address growing tensions similar to the summit held
between former President Barack Obama and Gulf leaders, according to several
sources. Fox News reported that Trump is studying several options for the summit
to defuse tensions among long-established US allies in the Gulf and renew his
call for those nations to confront the “crisis of Islamic extremism. “It’s a
Camp David moment. We’ve seen nothing like this in 40 years, and now the
president wants to follow through,” a senior White House official told Fox News.
A White House official told Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper that the US administration
wants to solve this diplomatic issue and work with the countries on combating
terrorism and extremism in the region. He reiterated the importance of defeating
ISIS for establishing stability. The official said that the US administration is
working on establishing what was achieved during Trump’s visit to Riyadh last
month. He added that several options are being considered including an Arab
summit, and currently the officials are studying the form and timing of this
summit. Regarding the 13 demands presented by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE, and
Bahrain, the official said that the White House will include them in the
discussions, reiterating that they will be the starting point for talks between
the parties. AFP reported another White House official saying President Trump is
keen on combating terrorist organizations in the region and cutting their
funding in general and not just those relating to Qatar.There is a need to
alienate and denounce such groups like Muslim Brotherhood for the stability of
the Middle East, said the official. UAE Ambassador Yousef al-Otaiba to US told
the press on Friday that the measures against Qatar “are there to stay until
there is a long-term solution to the issue.”He suggested the actions to pressure
Qatar will remain economic and diplomatic. Otaiba says “there is no military
element to this whatsoever.”The US has offered to help mediate, but Otaiba said
Kuwait will take the lead, adding that this is an “Arab issue that requires an
Arab solution.”While the US administration is considering several solutions,
White House spokesman Sean Spicer said the diplomatic crisis between Qatar and
other Arab nations is a “family issue” that the nations should work out among
themselves. Spicer didn’t comment on the specific demands that Saudi Arabia and
other Arab nations have placed on Qatar, but announced that Washington is
willing to play a “facilitating role” in the discussion. In related news, UN
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he is following the situation with Qatar
“with deep concern” and hopes the countries involved resolve the situation
through dialogue.
UN spokeswoman Eri Kaneko said Friday that the UN is ready to assist in
mediating if requested. She said, “any resolution or basis for discussion should
be consistent with international law including human rights and international
humanitarian law as well as the UN Charter as all countries concerned are UN
member states.”
Turkey’s Erdogan backs Qatar’s response to list of Arab
demands
Al Arabiya English, Reuters Sunday, 25 June 2017/Turkish President Tayyip
Ergodan said on Sunday he backed Qatar's response to a list of demands issued by
Arab states boycotting the Gulf state. Qatar has described the boycott by its
larger neighbors as an "blockade" aimed at curbing its sovereignty, and said
that the ultimatum by Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Bahrain
was unreasonable. Erdogan said Turkey appreciated and endorsed Qatar's response
to the 13 demands, which include closing the Al Jazeera satellite television
network, curbing relations with Iran and shutting a Turkish base in Qatar.
'Briefly unwell'
Speaking outside a mosque in Istanbul after prayers marking the Muslim Eid al-Fitr
holiday, Erdogan said he would continue his planned program despite feeling
briefly unwell. The Hurriyet daily said Erdogan received medical attention after
"briefly feeling unwell" during morning prayers at the Mimar Sinan mosque in
Istanbul. Some Turkish media reports said he had briefly fainted inside the
mosque, although this was not immediately confirmed. Erdogan said he had
suffered from a blood pressure issue due to a sugar imbalance in the body.
"Thanks to God I recovered quickly. Now I am feeling good and we will continue
with our program," he said, quoted by the state-run Anadolu news agency.
Turkey’s Erdogan says fine after feeling unwell in
prayers
Sun 25 Jun 2017/NNA - Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Sunday said he
was in good health after briefly feeling unwell during morning prayers in
Istanbul. The Hurriyet daily said Erdogan received medical attention after
“briefly feeling unwell” during morning prayers at the Mimar Sinan mosque in
Istanbul. Some Turkish media reports said he had briefly fainted inside the
mosque, although this was not immediately confirmed. Erdogan said he had
suffered from a blood pressure issue due to a sugar imbalance in the body.
“Thanks to God I recovered quickly. Now I am feeling good and we will continue
with our programme,” he said, quoted by the state-run Anadolu news agency.
Erdogan said that in the afternoon he would be attending a ceremony in Istanbul
of his ruling party to mark the festival celebrating the end of the holy Muslim
fasting month of Ramadan. Muslims for the past month have been required to
abstain from eating and drinking between sunrise and sunset. Erdogan is a pious
believer but has continued to follow a full political programme during the
fasting month, giving speeches nearly every evening over Ramadan at
fast-breaking iftar meals. The Turkish president, a former semi-professional
footballer, projects an image of a strong and vigorous leader who is in good
health. Erdogan, 63, has been in power since 2003, first as prime minister and
since 2014 as Turkey’s first directly elected president. ---AFP
UAE President in First Appearance since 2014 Stroke
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 25/17/United Arab Emirates President Sheikh
Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan made his first public appearance Sunday since
suffering a stroke more than three years ago, to mark the Eid al-Fitr Muslim
holiday. The official WAM news agency published pictures showing Sheikh Khalifa
meeting a number of prominent officials and rulers of the other six emirates
that with Abu Dhabi form the UAE. The guests came to his Abu Dhabi palace on the
first day of the Eid, which marks the end of the fasting month of Ramadan, and
Sheikh Khalifa appeared to be in good spirits, according to the pictures and a
short video posted on WAM's Twitter account. Sheikh Khalifa, 69, had not made a
public appearance since the UAE announced that he underwent an operation
following a stroke in January 2014. The president is also the ruler of the
oil-rich emirate of Abu Dhabi, the wealthiest of the seven emirates that form
the UAE as it sits on the bulk of the nation's oil wealth. After his illness,
Sheikh Khalifa's half-brother Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed took over
as de facto ruler, though Sheikh Khalifa continued to issue decrees and deal
with protocol issues. In addition to Abu Dhabi, the UAE comprises the emirates
of Ajman, Dubai, Fujairah, Ras al-Khaimah, Sharjah and Umm al-Qaiwain.
US: Qatar reviewing list of demands from boycotting
countries
Al Arabiya/June 25/17/The US Department of State has announced that Qatar has
begun reviewing the list of demands submitted by several Arab and Gulf countries
boycotting Doha. Washington said there were “important areas that lay the
groundwork for a dialogue to resolve the crisis” and urged on Sunday on all
nations to “continue dialogue and tone down rhetoric to help ease tensions.”. “A
productive next step would be for each of the countries to sit together and
continue this conversation,” “We believe our allies and partners are stronger
when they are working together towards one goal which we all agree is stopping
terrorism and countering extremism.” US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said in
a statement. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates have sent
a 13-point list of demands aimed at dismantling Qatar’s aggressive
interventionist foreign policy which has it support and incite extremist groups
over the years. Meanwhile, UAE Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Anwar
Gargash said on Saturday that instead of discussing a list of demands set by the
Gulf countries and Egypt, Qatar decided to leak them to the media. Gargash
described the media leak as “reckless” and there has been “no respect” towards
the mediation attempts by Kuwait from Qatar’s side.
Bahrain officially publishes list of demands conveyed to
Qatar
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Sunday, 25 June 2017/The Bahraini news agency
published the list of demands which Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab
Emirates and Egypt handed over to Qatar via Kuwait. According to BNA, Qatar was
requested to decrease diplomatic representation with Iran and curb ties with it,
expel revolutionary guards from Qatar, limit relations with Iran to commercial
trade without violating the sanctions imposed on Iran and without violating the
security of Gulf Cooperation Council countries and sever any military or
intelligence cooperation with Tehran. The demands also called on Qatar to
immediately shut down the Turkish military base which is being built in Qatar
and to suspend any military cooperation with Turkey inside Qatar. They also
include severing all relations with terrorist, sectarian and ideological
organizations, primarily those which threaten Bahrain, and other organizations
such as the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Fatah al-Sham, formerly known as
Al-Nusra Front, and the Lebanese Hezbollah Party and listing them as terrorist
entities and including them as terrorist organizations in any future lists.
Qatar was also demanded to suspend all forms of funding to terrorist or
extremist individuals, entities or organizations and to all those included in
the Saudi, Emirati, Bahraini and Egyptian terror lists and in the American and
international lists and to surrender all figures designated as terrorist by
these lists while holding their property until they’re handed over. They also
demanded Qatar not to host any of these designated terrorists in the future and
to commit to providing information about them, such as information on their
activity, residence and finances. This is in addition to demands to shut down
Al-Jazeera television channels and all channels affiliated with it. Qatar was
also ordered to stop interfering in other countries’ internal affairs and
foreign interests and refrain from granting the Qatari nationality to any Saudi,
Bahraini, Egyptian and Emirati citizenship and extradite all those who had been
granted a Qatari nationality via procedure which does not comply with these four
countries’ regulations.They also demanded Qatar to submit a list of those who
have been granted a citizenship from these four countries and to submit all
previous information about cooperation between Qatar and those naturalized. The
demands also include submitting all data about the opposition figures that Qatar
supported and shutting down all media outlets which Qatar directly or indirectly
supports. The four countries called on Qatar to be in harmony with its Arab and
Gulf surrounding on the military, political, economic, social and security
levels in order to guarantee security and to activate the Riyadh 2013 agreement
and the Riyadh 2014 agreement. According to BNA, these demands are somehow
similar to the Riyadh agreement which Qatar signed in 2014. Its report concluded
that Doha thus has no justifications to reject these demands.
Saudi Crown Prince to al-Azhar Sheikh: We Count on
Religious Institutions in Countering Extremism
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17/Mecca – Sheikh of al-Azhar, Ahmed al-Tayeb praised
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz, Deputy Premier and Minister of
Defense for the efforts he is exerting on enhancing the Arabic and Islamic
cooperation. Prince Mohammed received a telephone call from Sheikh Tayeb in
which he congratulated him on his new selection and appointment, wishing him all
success in serving his religion, homeland, Arab and Islamic nations under the
leadership of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman bin Abdulaziz.
Tayeb expressed al-Azhar’s condemnation of the failed terrorist attack that
targeted the Grand Holy Mosque in Makkah on Friday, stressing al-Azhar’s stand
with the Kingdom in combating terrorism and confronting it until it is
eradicated and uprooted. For his part, the Crown Prince expressed Saudi Arabia’s
appreciation to al-Azhar and its important role in clarifying the truths of
Islam and the dissemination of religion, especially in this delicate stage being
experienced by our Arab and Islamic nation.The Crown Prince pointed out that the
Islamic nation is counting greatly on the role of religious institutions in the
coming stage, praising the efforts led by Sheikh al-Azhar in confronting the
extremist ideology and terrorist groups. The Crown Prince congratulated Sheikh
of al-Azhar on the occasion of Eid al-Fitr, praying to Allah Almighty for its
returns to Arab and Islamic nations with welfare, prosperity and blessings. In
related news, Prince Mohammed continued to receive telephone calls from leaders
and top officials congratulating him on his selection as Crown Prince,
appointment as Deputy Premier, and continuing as Minister of Defense. The Crown
Prince expressed his appreciation and thanks for their noble feelings and wished
their people prosperity. Prince Mohammed received calls from Emir of Kuwait
Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jaber Al-Sabah, Prime Minister of Islamic Republic of
Pakistan Mohammad Nawaz Sharif, Pakistani Minister of Defense Khawaja Muhammad
Asif, Egyptian Minister of Defense and Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces of
Egypt Sedki Sobhy, Malaysian Minister of Defense Hishammuddin Hussein, and
Lebanese Forces Leader Samir Geagea.
Iraqi Forces Evacuate Hundreds of Civilians amid Clashes in
Mosul’s Old City
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17/Erbil- Iraqi forces on Saturday secured several exits
for hundreds of civilians to escape Mosul’s Old City amid clashes pushing
against ISIS ultra-hardliners. ISIS militants have been fighting a fierce battle
in the hopes of salvaging their last key stronghold in Iraq.US-trained urban
warfare units were channeling their onslaught along two perpendicular streets
that converge in the heart of the Old City, aiming to isolate the ISIS
terrorists in four pockets. The United Nations voiced alarm on Saturday at the
rising death toll among civilians in the fighting, saying as many as 12 were
killed and hundreds injured on Friday. “Fighting is very intense in the Old City
and civilians are at extreme, almost unimaginable risk. There are reports that
thousands, maybe even tens of thousands, of people are being held as human
shields (by ISIS),” Lise Grande, the UN humanitarian coordinator in Iraq, said
in a statement. “Hundreds of civilians, including children, are being shot.”
Iraqi authorities are hoping to declare victory in the northern Iraqi city in
the Muslim Eid holiday, which marks the end of the fasting month of Ramadan,
during the next few days. A Reuters correspondent saw a young girl with facial
injuries walking dazed and shocked across the frontline out of heavily-populated
district with a group of neighbors. Helicopter gunships were assisting the
ground thrust, firing at insurgent emplacements in the Old City, a Reuters
correspondent reported from a location near the frontlines. The government
advance was carving out escape corridors for civilians marooned behind ISIS
lines. More than 100,000 civilians, of whom half are believed to be children,
remain trapped in the crumbling old houses of the Old City, with little food,
water or medical treatment. The urban-warfare forces were leading the campaign
to clear the ISIS militiamen from the maze of Old City alleyways, moving on foot
house-to-house in locations too cramped for the use of armored combat
vehicles.Aid organizations and Iraqi authorities say ISIS was trying to prevent
civilians from leaving so as to use them as human shields. Hundreds of civilians
fleeing the Old City have been killed in the past three weeks. A US-led
international coalition is providing ground and air support in the
eight-month-old campaign to seize Mosul, the largest city the militants came to
control in a shock offensive in Iraq and neighboring Syria three years ago.
US-supported Iraqi government offensives have wrested back several important
urban centers in the country’s west and north from ISIS over the past 18 months.
Iran mocks reports its Syria missile strikes fell short
Ynetnews/Associated Press|/June 25/17/TEHRAN, Iran—Iran said Sunday the
two-stage missiles it fired at ISIS targets in Syria broke apart over the Iraqi
desert as planned, mocking reports that some of the projectiles fell short.State
TV's website quoted the airspace division chief of Iran's Revolutionary Guard
Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh as saying "we had coordinated the fall of the engines in
the desert in Iraq" in advance. "The missiles we used were two-stage, it means
that the engine separates from the warhead," said Hajizadeh.Hajizadeh said US
drones hovered over the targets after shortly the Iranian missiles hit them. He
said the US may have been informed beforehand about the attack, as they had
informed the Russian military, which may have relayed the information to the
Americans. The Guard said it fired six such missiles on Sunday at ISIS targets
in the city of Deir el-Zour, more than 600 kilometers away. He mocked media
reports citing Israeli sources who said some of the missiles fell short of their
targets, suggesting that the Israelis were unable to identify two-stage
missiles, which are designed to split apart mid-flight. "Pity those who call
themselves experts and do not understand that these were the first-stage engines
(that fell), while the warheads hit targets."Iranian reports said the guard
launched six Zolfasghar and Qiam missiles. The latter have detachable warheads.
Iran says it is continuously developing its missile program; a key reason US
President Donald Trump's administration has put Iran "on notice". Iran said the
strikes were in retaliation for the attack by five militants linked to the ISIS
group that stormed Iran's parliament and a shrine to revolutionary leader
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini this month, killing at least 18 people and wounding
more than 50. Iran has long supported Syrian President Bashar Assad in his fight
against ISIS and other extremists groups.
Egypt’s Sisi Ratifies Maritime Border Deal with Saudi
Arabia
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17/Cairo – Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi
ratified a maritime demarcation agreement that sees his country relinquish
sovereignty over two uninhabited Red Sea islands to Saudi Arabia, the government
said in a statement on Saturday. Member of Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs
Ayman Salamah stated that the agreement will be put into effect as soon as the
ratification documents have been exchanged between the two countries. He
explained that the procedure is more likely to be done during an official
ceremony in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, since it was initially signed last year
between the two countries in Cairo. Salamah told Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper that
in case the ceremony didn’t take place, the ratification documents could be
exchanged via diplomatic channels. On June 14, Egypt’s parliament approved the
border demarcation agreement. Parliament Speaker Ali Abdelaal announced the
parliament’s approval of the agreement after the vote. When implemented, the
deal would effectively transfer sovereignty over the two uninhabited Red Sea
islands, Tiran and Sanafir, at the southern entrance of the Gulf of Aqaba from
Egypt to Saudi Arabia.
The government declared that both islands were only under Egyptian protection
since 1950 following the request of late King Abdulaziz Al Saud.
Russia, Kazakhstan Stress Need to Continue Geneva, Astana
Paths
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17/Moscow- Russia and Kazakhstan said it is important
that the international community supports a deal in Syria, as Kazakhstan’s
Foreign Minister Kairat Abdrakhmanov expressed his belief that meetings held in
Astana to discuss the Syrian file could be the culmination of the Geneva talks,
while Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stressed the need that external
players support a ceasefire in the war-torn country. In a statement delivered at
the Eurasian Media Forum, the Kazakh foreign minister was keen to assert that
the Astana talks were not a replacement of the Syrian talks held in Geneva. “The
Astana process, which discusses practical measures for resolving the Syrian
crisis, is the culmination of the Geneva talks,” said the foreign minister.
Abdrakhmanov said there are currently 3 baskets in the Geneva talks, including
the elections and the constitutional and government reforms. But, he also spoke
about a fourth basket, which is the need to confront terrorism. Meanwhile,
Lavrov said that external players should support the Syrian ceasefire to focus
on the fight against terrorism. During a meeting with leader of Lebanon’s
Progressive Socialist Party Walid Jumblatt, Lavrov said that the efforts being
made to resolve the Syrian crisis received an additional impetus as a result of
the initiatives put forward by Russia, Turkey and Iran, which he said, aim at
introducing the ceasefire and setting up deescalation zones. Lavrov said that
the implementation of these initiatives “is planned to be discussed in
Astana.”Meanwhile, Kyrgyzstan’s President Almazbek Atambayev said on Saturday he
was surprised to hear reports that his country could send peacekeeping troops to
Syria. During his visit to Moscow on Saturday, Atambayev told reports: “This
question was not raised at all during my talks (in Russia).” Atambayev said that
such a move requires a UN resolution among other approvals. Last Thursday,
Vladimir Shamanov, head of the Russian Duma’s defense committee said his country
was currently negotiating with Kyrgyz and Kazakh representatives the possibility
of sending soldiers from both countries to Syria.
Syrian Opposition Attacks Quneitra with Advanced Weapons
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17/London, Beirut- Syrian armed opposition factions
pounded Saturday the city of al-Baath in the province of Quneitra, southern
Syria with advanced weapons, killing and injuring tens of regime forces.
The opposition’s attack coincided with their destruction of seven regime tanks
in the nearby town of Deraa. “The opposition factions launched one of their
fiercest attacks on the city of al-Baath using four fronts: Oufaya, al-Hurriya,
Hamidiyah and western Samdaniya,” a source said, adding that those factions were
fighting with very advanced weapons. Also, unidentified warplanes pounded on
Saturday positions of regime forces and Iranian militias northwest the town of
Kafr Nasij, in the north of Deraa, in the area known as the “triangle of death”
located between the countryside of Deraa and Quneitra and the countryside of
west Damascus. Pro-Hezbollah media announced that the “Syrian (regime) army
confronted a fierce attack launched by al-Nusra Front and other allied factions
at the outskirts of the city of al-Baath in the countryside of Quneitra.” The
Hezbollah media said regime forces killed and injured several members of those
opposition factions and destroyed one of their tanks. Meanwhile, an Israeli
aircraft attacked two Syrian regime tanks in the northern part of the Golan
Heights in response to over 10 projectiles launched from Syria, and IDF
spokesperson said on Saturday. The spokesperson said no injuries were reported
following the attacks. Opposition factions had earlier announced destroying
another regime tank in Deraa, to increase to seven the number of regime forces
tanks destroyed by the opposition during the past three days of the Quneitra
battles. Also, a source told Asharq Al-Awsat that factions from the Free Army
had presented to Moscow a list of demands including the need that all Iranian
and Hezbollah militias leave the city of Deraa and the southern frontline, and
to stay 50 kilometers away from the Jordanian border.
Netanyahu warns Iran over Syria involvement after Golan
exchange
Herb Keinon/Jerusalem Post/June 25/2017 /Day after spillover from Syria prompts
retaliatory IDF strike, PM stresses that Israel will not allow the Islamic
Republic to establish a permanent presences on the Golan. Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu warned Iran on Sunday that Israel “views gravely” its
attempts to set up a military presence in Syria and to arm Hezbollah with
advanced weaponry via Syria and Lebanon. His comments at the weekly cabinet
meeting came a day after the IDF responded to mortar fire from Syria by
attacking Syrian army targets across the border. “Our policy is clear,” he said.
“We will not accept any kind of 'drizzle, not of mortars, rockets, or spillover
fire [from the Syrian Civil War]. We respond with force to every attack on our
territory and against our citizens.”Netanyahu has said repeatedly that Israel
will act to prevent game-changing weapons from reaching Hezbollah through Syria,
to prevent the establishment of a permanent Iranian military presence on its
border, and to keep rockets from being fired from Syria into Israel. Turning to
diplomatic issues, he said that in advance of the visit next week of India's
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the cabinet will approve a number of measures
aimed at enhancing the relationship between the two countries. “This is a
historic visit,” he said. “For 70 years no Indian prime minister has visited the
country, and this is another expression of the military, economic and diplomatic
strength of Israel,” he said, calling Modi’s visit “a very significant step
towards strengthening the ties between the two countries.”Netanyahu said that
relations with India, a country of 1.25 billion people and one of the world's
largest economies, is on a steady increase. The cabinet decisions regarding ties
with India that will pass include increasing exports, deepening cooperation in
the fields of water and agriculture, establishing a joint fund for research and
innovation, and increasing Indian tourism to Israel The steadily growing ties
with India, he said, “is another expression of Israel's international position
which has gotten stronger over the last number of years, as we have strengthened
Israel.”The prime minister also mentioned the ongoing crisis at in the pediatric
hemato-oncology department at Hadassah-University Medical Center in Jerusalem’s
Ein Kerem, saying it has gone on for “too long.”Before the issue goes to the
High Court of Justice on Wednesday, Netanyahu called on the sides of the dispute
to return the situation to what it was in March before six physicians who are
experts in blood cancer resigned to protest the management of the Hadassah
Medical Organization by its director-general, Prof. Zeev Rotstein. Netanyahu
said the sides should then take the next six to 12 months to resolve the issue.
UAE’s Gargash: Diplomacy Is Priority in Dealing with
Qatar Crisis, Alternative is ‘Parting of Ways’
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 25/17/Dubai- UAE Minister of State for Foreign Affairs
Anwar Gargash said on Saturday that if Qatar did not accept the conditions by
fellow Arab states which imposed a boycott this month on the gas-rich peninsula,
there would be a “parting of ways”. “The alternative is not escalation, the
alternative is parting of ways, because it is very difficult for us to maintain
a collective grouping,” Gargash told reporters. He said diplomacy with Qatar
remained a priority, but added that mediation efforts to resolve the dispute had
been undermined by the public disclosure of the demands.
“The mediators’ ability to shuttle between the parties and try and reach a
common ground has been compromised by this leak,” he said. “Their success is
very dependent on their ability to move but not in the public space.”A 13-point
list of demands has been presented by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and the UAE.
It includes closing the Al Jazeera satellite television network, curbing
relations with Iran, shutting a Turkish base in Doha and paying reparations.
Gargash said that if Qatar fails to comply within the 10-day timeline set out in
the ultimatum, it will be isolated. Gargash said the Turkish deployment of
troops to Qatar was a “meaningless escalation” and he hoped Ankara would act in
a “reasonable way”. “We hope that Turkey prioritizes the interest of the Turkish
state and not partisan ideology,” Gargash said. For its part, Kuwait is helping
mediate the dispute as is the United States, for which it has posed a
challenging test since Qatar hosts a base housing the headquarters of US air
power in the Middle East as well as 11,000 troops. The bloc of Arab states that
imposed the sanctions on Qatar accuse it of funding terrorism, fomenting
regional unrest and drawing too close to terror state sponsors, like Iran. The
sanctions have disrupted Qatar’s main import routes by land from Saudi Arabia
and by sea from big container ships docked in the United Arab Emirates.
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on
June 25-26/17
هل الوضع في الجولان سيدخل إسرائيل في الحرب
السورية
Will the situation on the Golan suck Israel into the Syrian Civil War?
Ben Lynfield/Jerusalem Post/June 25/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=56553
There should be no illusions that the trouble on the Golan border will recede
any time soon.
What is now a nuisance in the Golan Heights threatens to become a big burden,
increasingly sucking Israel into the vortex of the six-year-old Syrian Civil
War.
More stray shells from fighting in Syria landed in the Israeli-annexed part of
the Golan Heights Sunday, a day after the IAF struck two Syrian army tanks and a
heavy machine gun in response to earlier spillover of projectiles from
inner-Syrian fighting.
There were no casualties but the IDF issued instructions to farmers and
civilians to avoid open fields nearby and backpackers and hikers were also
evacuated. Leaders made tough statements that Israel will hold the Syrian regime
responsible for any fire at Israeli-held territory.
But there should be no illusions that the trouble on the Golan border will
recede any time soon.
It is the Assad regime and its Iranian and Hezbollah allies that have the
overall momentum now in the war. The regime is determined to press ahead in the
Golan and retake positions that were captured by the rebels.
"In the overall map Bashar, the Iranians and the Russians are more successful
but where things will head it is difficult to know," says Tel Aviv University
Syria specialist Eyal Zisser. He says that while it was rebels who launched an
attack Saturday on a Syrian army position in the Golan "it doesn't change the
strategic picture. The concern is that the regime will return [to control of the
Golan]. It has the upper hand in all of Syria so there is concern that it will
also return next to the Golan."
That would mean Iranian and Hezbollah troops along the Israeli-annexed part of
the Golan, an intolerable situation in the view of decision-makers and analysts.
"Hezbollah and the Iranians are deadly enemies of Israel,they don't recognize
Israel's right to exist,"says former Mossad director Ephraim Halevy. "Therefore
they don't adhere to any international, bilateral relations and agreements to
which Israel is involved."
"The [Golan] separation line was created in 1974 with Israeli and Syrian
agreement and it was for many years the most quiet border Israel had. Now, if on
the other side of the divide you don't have an entity that respects agreement on
the separation line because its policy is to not agree with Israel on anything,
that Israel doesn't exist, than this is something Israel need not and should not
tolerate," Halevy stressed.
Israel signaled this in January 2015 when an airstrike against two cars on the
Syrian side of the Golan killed six Hezbollah fighters and a general of the
Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Mohammed Ali Allahdadi.
To stop the regime from making gains in the Golan, Israel has for years supplied
Syrian rebels near its border with food, fuel, medical supplies and cash,
according to a recent report in the Wall Street Journal. The report said that a
special Israeli army unit has been set up to supervise the transfer of this aid,
which reportedly helps rebel groups pay salaries and buy weapons.
There is even Israeli cooperation in the Golan with Fath al-Sham, formerly known
as the Nusra Front, the local affiliate of al-Qaeda, according to Moshe Maoz, a
Syria specialist and emeritus professor at the Hebrew University. "Israel
supports them logistically and by admitting wounded warriors into Israeli
hospitals and maybe also with the supply of arms," he said.
An IDF spokeswoman responded by referring to a written statement that said "the
IDF is not a side to and is not involved in the internal Syrian fighting but at
the same time views with gravity every attempt to harm the sovereignty of the
State of Israel and its residents and views the Syrian regime as responsible for
what is done in its territory."
Asked whether Israel should support Fath al-Sham, Halevy, the former Mossad
chief, responded: "Israel should do everything that is necessary to further its
policy that Iranian and Iranian supported forces should not be deployed along
the Golan Heights."
Given the priority of preventing that, it seems axiomatic that if Syrian regime
forces and their allies make significant gains Israel will have to escalate its
involvement.
At the least this will mean closer coordination with the rebel groups and more
airstrikes not just to deter fire into Israeli-annexed territory but to support
their operations.
Establishing a security zone with ground troops entering the Syrian side of the
Golan is not a preferred option, Maoz said. "It may be more convenient to help
proxies and intervene only occasionally because a security zone is dangerous,"
he continued. "We know what happened in Lebanon so Israel is careful not to do
it again."
What Sharia Prescribes: Same as the Ten Commandments?
Nonie Darwish/Gatestone Institute/June 25/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10570/sharia-ten-commandments
Islam was created 600 years after Christianity not to affirm the Bible, but to
discredit it; not to co-exist with "the people of the book" -- Jews and
Christians -- but to replace them.
It is hard to read Islamic law books without concluding that Islamic values are
essentially "a rebellion against the Ten Commandments".
Islam violates the commandment "Thou shalt not murder" when Allah commanded
Muslims to kill Allah's enemies, and in the process, kill and be killed in jihad
if they are to be guaranteed heaven.
Accepting a parallel legal system would effectively nullify actual freedom for
many of the people possibly forced to use it, and the ability to receive equal
justice under law. Sharia is the reason there is a death warrant out on this
author, on Salman Rushdie and others, for apostasy.
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, of the "Ground Zero mosque", once again wrote a deeply
inaccurate article reprimanding Americans for their supposedly "right-wing
caricature" of Islamic law, sharia, which he insists is not a threat to American
law. In his recent article "The silly American fear of sharia law", he denied
that sharia is incompatible with US laws and the constitution. Oh, really?
Imam Rauf tries to blame sharia's amputation and stoning on Biblical Law:
"Sharia is not about amputations and stoning. These extreme punishments carry
over from earlier, biblical law" and "Within the history of Islam, they have
rarely occurred. What Islamic law does prescribe are the same do's [sic] and
don'ts of the Ten Commandments."
Imam Rauf's article is, to say the least, misleading -- especially regarding the
Ten Commandments. Sharia is not only incompatible with Western legal system but
is the direct opposite of Western values; it has violated all ten of the Ten
Commandments.
Islam was created 600 years after Christianity not to affirm the Bible, but to
discredit it; not to co-exist with "the people of the book" -- Jews and
Christians -- but to replace them. It is hard to read Islamic law books without
concluding that Islamic values are essentially "a rebellion against the Ten
Commandments."
Islam has little respect for human life -- of either Muslims or non-Muslims. To
begin with, Islam violates the commandment "Thou shalt not murder." Sharia
punishes sins against Allah, such as blasphemy and apostasy, with execution.
This is while it prohibits prosecuting Muslims who kill apostates, and also
parents and grandparents who kill their offspring. Allah commands Muslims to
kill Allah's enemies, and in the process, kill and be killed in jihad if they
are to be guaranteed heaven.
"Surely Allah has purchased of the believers their lives and their belongings
and in return has promised that they shall have Paradise.106 They fight in the
Way of Allah, and slay and are slain. Such is the promise He has made incumbent
upon Himself in the Torah, and the Gospel, and the Qur'an.107 Who is more
faithful to his promise than Allah? Rejoice, then, in the bargain you have made
with Him. That indeed is the mighty triumph." (9:111)
The concept of adultery and loyalty in marriage is totally different. Loyalty is
expected from the woman under penalty of death, but men have a lot of room in
that regard, the result of the rights of polygamy and temporary marriage for
Muslim men. Thus, in Islam, the concept of marriage as a covenant of loyalty
between one man and one woman does not exist.
In regards to stealing, let us not be fooled by Islam's barbaric punishment for
stealing with amputation of limbs. Islam is serious about stealing only when a
Muslim steals from other Muslims. Killing and stealing are even connected in
Islam: after killing non-Muslims in jihad, Muslims are rewarded with their
property, their homes, businesses, women, and children, all of which are
regarded legitimate booty, or spoils of war. Some people claim this does not
exist today, but just try telling that to Middle Eastern Christians and Jews who
have been robbed of their property and their land, and whose homes have been
taken by Muslims. A leading imam and professor at Rhodes College in Memphis,
Tennessee, Yasir Qadhi has said, "Muslims have the right to take the property of
filthy Christians and Jews." Qadhi has been described by the New York Times
Magazine as "one of the most influential conservative clerics in American
Islam."
Qadhi justifies stealing from Jews and Christians as "a means to establish
monotheism on the land." He quotes Muhammad saying "I have been commanded to
fight the people until they" convert and explains that "if they don't, their
life and property are halal [free for the taking] to the Muslims."
In regard to truthfulness in sharia, again, as with stealing, Islam has many
loopholes, and sharia clearly states that lying is an obligation under certain
conditions, such as if it is for the benefit of Islam.
As to contentment and coveting thy neighbor's house and wife, Islam again uses
coveting to lure Muslims to perform jihad.
The whole concept of jihad is a brazen violation of the Tenth Commandment: it
means conquest over non-Muslims and taking what they have.
Islamic books tell us that Muhammad did not just covet the possessions of his
non-Muslim enemies. When he desired the wife of his adopted son Ali, he had a
revelation making it legitimate and holy for Ali to divorce his wife and
Muhammad to marry her.
The Tenth Commandment -- Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt
not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his
ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's -- is utterly alien to
Islamic values; Islamic books are full of examples of stripping Allah's enemies
of their possessions, homes, property, trading caravan goods, women, and
children.
The American people are not at all silly for opposing sharia. Even the
supposedly benign laws of sharia regarding marriage and divorce that Imam Rauf
claims are a religious right, totally destroy a woman's right to divorce and
retain custody of her children.
Accepting sharia in the US would totally change the Western concept of marriage
by allowing polygamy, wife-beating, female genital mutilation, rape and marrying
children.
Any legal system that governs a nation and that is being exported needs be
scrutinized. Accepting a parallel legal system would effectively nullify actual
freedom for many of the people possibly forced to use it, and be gross
negligence against American citizens, their freedom, and above all the ability
to receive equal justice under law.
Sharia is the reason there is a death warrant out on this author, and well as
for Salman Rushdie and others, for free speech and apostasy, and why I am unable
to visit my country of origin, Egypt, or any country where Muslims are in a
majority.
No, Imam Rauf, fear of sharia is not "silly"; it is probably the most
clear-eyed, desperately urgent fear that anyone who cares about freedom can
have.
*Nonie Darwish, born and raised in Egypt, is the author of "Wholly Different;
Why I chose Biblical Values over Islamic Values"
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Most Want Person Terror List
Hakim Haider/Gatestone Institute/June 25/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10551/most-want-person-terror-list
One of these World Banned Terrorist Organization Head was just elected Member
for Parliament.
If world add my name Thousand Time on Most Want Person Terror List, than am not
for care: the Love that You are gives me are Bigger! This list are nothing
infront of me, it equal to the piece of Paper.
Editors' note: To those of you who have enquired, the author is a real man
living in the Middle East who sent us these pieces because he is unable to share
them with anyone where he lives. At first we tried to tidy up the English, but
that seemed to knock much of the soul out of his work. So we made the editorial
choice to present his work basically as he sent it; what you are seeing is the
result of that choice. It is the way he sees the world from his point of view,
unobstructed by editors. Perhaps think of it more as a different kind of
article, more as folk art but in words. It is not meant to offend anyone or any
religion. It always seemed, living among people from different nations, as if
wrongnesses in English were often "righter" than rightnesses. The painter Paul
Gauguin reportedly said: "If you see a tree as blue, then make it blue." We
apologize to anyone who may not like these postings. "Those who understand,
understand."
A lot of World Banned Terrorist Organization start for work openly in my
Country. One of these World Banned Terrorist Organization Head was just elected
Member for Parliament. Other day, a Ambulance come by with mark of Famous World
Banned Terrorist Organization that say they collecting fund for Muslims in Iraq,
Syria, Afghanistan, etc. There are two persons one are driving the Ambulance and
other one announce in a speaker for Donation. He say, We buy Food and cloth for
our Men and we also use this Donation for Fight Against The Enemy Jihad.
He also say that, Tomorrow we arrange a Really, and our organization Main
Leaders participates in this and all of you participates in this Good-Deed also.
Next day in Play Ground where in evening few Boys plays cricket, at morning
under the dusty sun we listen the Voice of Quranic Verse and Songs of Anthem
that force a person to fight. There are a Stage with Dice and Mice -- the Dice
with sitting arrangement and Mice to loud the voice -- and also many chairs
infront . There are Black and green Flags every place and on these Flags the
First Kalimah–e-Tayyaba are print or write: No God there are but Allah and
Muhammad PBUH are the messenger.
Every where are arranger wearing turban on the head. Some wear white, some wear
the yellow or Brown. Behind the stage is giant banner where Kalima-e-Tayyaba are
write again, this time with all the Well-Known World Banned Terrorist
Organization name on one side and on Other, many pictures of them: Osama Bin
Laden, Mulla Umar, al-Zawahiri and other Well-Known Most-Want Persons. At the
end there are a Statement in a Big Letters: "THESE ARE THE TRUE LIONS OF ISLAM
AND MUSLIM WORLD"
Soon One person in Black Turban and Long Hairs on face announce, Now we begins
the mass meeting with the name of Allah and recites the Holy Quran.
Then a person recite the few Quranic Verses and after this, deliver the short
speech on the personality of Prophet P.B.U.H. After that, the Stage Host invite
some One for deliver speech for Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. He also tell that
he is Honour for serve the Osama, Zawahiri and Mulla Umar. He tell his speech
with these word:
Muslims you know Osama, Umar and Zawahiri, they are bear a lot of hardship for
you. Am have also cleans the blood and sees the scratch on their body for you
against The Enemies of Islam!
After this, one more person are invites to Dice and Mice for deliver speech for
tell every One go right a Way for prepare himself in The Fight Against The
Enemy. One of these say, We now are change the way for Fight. We now discover
New Way. Our Enemy are ancient Clever. We now make The Strong Alliance on all
the Other Organization and help each Other with Hidden Shake Hand. We now
prepare for educate young Boys, Girls and any interest person to take part in
This Holy Fight. We needs your donation for Wins this Fight!
After speech, the Host say, Now am invite on Dice such type of person who are
not wearing dress like us, who do not have turban and long Hairs on face, but he
are a person who are working in a World Strongest Intelligence Network more than
30 year and get a permotion until in Army he are a General! Still, after his
retirement, his soul nor care not take a rest. Now He give us ideas and ways to
fight because he Well-Known in this. He take part in four war and know how how
for Defeat The Enemy.
So he invite him. General stand from chair and raise the hand and all the crowd
start hooting in the favour of this person. He start his speech to saying,
Am serve the one of strongest Army more than 37 year, and more than 30 year am
done my service in a Intelligence Network that is the World Best Intelligence
Network and am see and observe closely every Thing. Am also work in world Most
Dangerous Countries and it are my exercise when and how are Capture the Enemy.
Am also know on every Weapon how for use them. It are a great, great loss for
Muslim Worlds that al-Qaida are not in her best position that was before when it
have work for the Osama. Mulla Umar were Good Person also. Am meet with him so
many Time. But when this point come into my mind, that now al-Qaida soo weak, it
fill tears in my eyes, but it are a great gift for us that One more Organization
that are more strong than Qaida and that are working in Syria, Afghanistan,
Iraq, etc. Am not have any link with that but am advice all the leaders who is
sitting here to make the collision and help them with every way Donation -
Weapon, the Human Resource, Food, Shelter, every Thing, and when Ever you need
my help I will with you! Am know how collects the weapons and how for use them!
Now This Time if you want for Fight Against The Enemy, this Fight Need Blood.
Blood of Youngster! Am remember acutely well when have been soldier, there are
so many aged soldier with us, but we are young, so we say on him, Just gives us
support from back and we lead to the fight infront. So many my brothers soldier
becomes Shaheed (martyr). Am also touch and feel the Hot Blood on my Young
Soldier, but when we have try to save them they say on us for, Carry on with
Fight do not have Care for us. So we leaves them there and when comes back, most
are been Shaheed. Their Blood were Hot. Soo this Time if you want for build the
strong wall like al-Qaida, then Shake the Hand and help the Mujahideens, then
one day we too gets success and takes them to the next location. My message for
you are plain: You takes interest and builds this new group. Before, Enemy feel
fear from al-Qaida, but now with Your Contribution and Your Help, Enemy again
feel More Fear from this new group of Mujahideen. If we need for do the robbery
and collect a weapons for them, then we are not feel hasitation for do this. One
day, we are takeover World, one day we are takeover Every Place!
After this, the host the invite Chief Guest, who are also on the World Most Want
Terrorist List. Chief Guest say,
Not have more words. My brothers who address you before me tells you every Thing
and the General who address you before me, am deeply thanks full to him that he
join us and am say this openly. It are our first success from Allah! As already
you know, that Enemy feel fear from me and he add my name on Most Wan Person
Terror List. This is happen because am Fight Against The Enemy. My Team and my
Welfare Organizations works for people who are Needy in the World. If Enemy
think that this are wrong, Enemy are wrong. Am do this terrorist till Last
Breath, till Grave, till the Death. Not for bury me in grave till some One
inform me that Enemy are no more on this Earth. It are my promise to you, am
Destroy every Enemy. If world add my name Thousand Time on Most Want Person
Teror List, than am not for care: the Love that You are gives me are Bigger!
This list are nothing infront of me, it equal to the piece of Paper. Am also
advice to my family, My Sons, that if I becomes die, then carry my Mission
forward. Now no one able to damage me because now we have person who know every
Thing about War and War Game. And it are my Honour that am standing on that
place where he are before me. He donate his Life for War or Fight. So the
Organization who are running in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria etc., we carry one day
Your Flag, and Your Flag raise one day over World, those are our Wish! One day
we destroy the Infidel, until he accomplish last day on Earth!
He carry on for nearly dark with out for use a single word for peace. But when
Ever he use War, Blood, Guns, Infidel, words like this, the public rise up the
voice. The men in Turban invites and announce new and young persons for comes
and shake the hand with us and the person will go and serves in defance forces.
They then go wander in different city and arrange mass meeting and no one tell
them now stops.
*Hakim Haider is based in the Middle East.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Egyptian TV Host Youssef Al-Husseini Following London Mosque Attack: The Muslims
Have Contributed Nothing But Terror, So Why Do You Expect Them to Love You?
MEMRI TV/June 25/17
Youssef Al-Husseini is an Egyptian journalist and TV host, who has worked for
several Egyptian TV channels. Since 2011, he has been working for ON TV. He also
writes columns for leading Egyptian newspapers, including Roz Al-Yusuf, Al-Yawm
Al-Sab'i, and others. Following the vehicular attack outside a London mosque on
June 19, Al-Husseini said: "Why do they hate us?! If they didn't, there would be
something mentally wrong with them." Claiming that the Muslims have contributed
nothing to the West except slaughter, massacres, and terror attacks, Al-Husseini
said: "And you still expect them to love us?!" His address aired on ON TV on the
day of the attack.
Youssef Al-Husseini: "The terror attack that unfortunately took place [in
London] was a vehicular attack. This time, it was near a mosque, if you follow
the news. How can anyone decide to carry out a terror attack near a place of
worship - near a mosque, a church, or any temple where God is worshipped? In all
the previous vehicular attacks, at least in 2016 and 2017, the "heroes" were,
unfortunately, Muslims. And then people wonder why they hate us.
"Why do they hate us?! If they didn't, there would be something mentally wrong
with them.
"[We] use weapons all the time, slaughter people all the time, flay people all
the time, burn people alive all the time, run people over all the time, and
plant explosive devices and car bombs all the time.
"Why do you still expect them to love you?"
"Tell me what the Muslims have contributed to the world throughout the 20th
century? Nothing. What have the Turkish Muslims of the Ottoman state contributed
to the West? Slaughter, massacres, the impaling of Europeans on spears... It's
true. That's what the Turks did in Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries. What
did the Muslim Turks do to their Arab neighbors, most of whom are Muslims? They
enslaved them, tortured them, imposed inflated taxes upon them. They made their
lives unbearable. What did the Muslims contribute to the West in the 19th and
20th centuries, except for the theories of Maududi, Sayyid Qutb, Abu Bakr Naji,
and Osama Bin Laden? What did the Muslims contribute to the West? Don't say to
me: "The literature of Naguib Mahfouz and the science of Ahmed Zewail." The
[achievements] of these people cannot be attributed to their being Muslims.
"What have the Muslims shown [the West] other than the bombing of their capital
cities? What have the Muslims shown them other than vehicular attacks? What have
the Muslims shown them other than shooting at them? What have the Muslims shown
them other than burning them alive in cages? They burn other Muslims alive as
well. They all claim to have a monopoly over Islam.
"What have the Muslims shown [the Westerners] to make them love them, and
welcome them in their countries?
"After all this, you still ask me why they hate us?! And then people invent new
terms, like "a global conspiracy against Islam." Man, a global conspiracy
against Islam would mean that the Muslims are being massacred around the world.
The opposite is true. It is the non-Muslims who are being massacred. Am I right,
or what? Then you say to me: Have you considered the Muslim minorities in India
or Mali? To tell you the truth, what I see is Muslims perpetrating massacres
against Christians and other majorities across the globe.
"The Muslims are constantly whining, lamenting, and wailing: The West is
conspiring against us. Fine, let's assume that the West is conspiring against
you and only sees your negative image. Where is your positive image? The Muslims
of the Abbasid state presented a positive image. They exported scientific
research through the so-called "Muslim" scholars, most of whom, by the way, were
not from the Arabian Peninsula. None of them were from the Arabian Peninsula.
They were all from North Africa, and from what are now called the former Soviet
Islamic republics of central Asia.
"What have the Arab countries contributed to the world? Nothing. What have the
Islamic countries contributed to the world? Nothing. What have they contributed
in the field of scientific research? Two, three, four, or ten scientists in the
course of 1,435 years? C'mon, man! Let's forget about 435 years and keep just
one millennium. Ten important scientists in 1,000 years?! Who invented the
airplane? The missile? The space shuttle? Centrifuges? Quantum mechanics? The
Theory of Relativity? Who? Where did the most important philosophers come from?
Not from here. And you still expect them to love us?! And then you say:
"Terror-sponsoring countries like Britain deserve..." Nonsense! People do not
deserve to be killed, slaughtered, or run over by a car."
Central Europe’s Tough Choice: Macron or Orban?
Ivan Krastev/The New York Times/June 25/17
SOFIA, Bulgaria — At the end of 2016, devastated by Brexit and unsettled by
Donald Trump’s victory in the American presidential election, many Europeans
fell into deep despair. They had become resigned to the notion that the European
Union’s moment in history was over. Six months later, nothing is different, yet
everything has changed. Polls show that a growing number of Europeans are
betting on the European Union. Improved economies across the Continent, the
miserable performance of populists in the Netherlands, and the humiliation
suffered by the “hard Brexiteer” Theresa May in this month’s general election in
Britain have made many Europeans hopeful that the European Union has received a
second chance, and that it is going to make the most of it.
Emmanuel Macron’s decisive victories in France — first in the presidential
election in May and then again in parliamentary elections last week — on a
proudly pro-European platform have led many Europeans to believe that rather
than disintegration, further integration may now be possible. The hope among the
ever-closer-unionists is that Mr. Macron’s labor reforms in France will persuade
Germany to invest more in eurozone economies. Meanwhile, plans for further
investment in European defense are afoot.
But while infectious optimism is visible everywhere in Western Europe, the East
has remained conspicuously unenthusiastic. The prospect of Eastern Europeans
exiting the union — as the former Czech president Vaclav Klaus recently implored
them to do — is still about as likely as President Vladimir Putin of Russia
losing next year’s elections, but many in Eastern Europe are squeamish about
German-French efforts to reorder Europe. Why?
The answer is quite straightforward. The governments in Poland and Hungary fear
that further political integration will endanger the illiberal regimes they have
put in place, while many Eastern Europeans fear that any Macron-Merkel
initiative could result in a two-tiered Europe where they are second-class
citizens.
Most of Central Europe is not in the eurozone — Bulgaria and Romania are not
even in the Schengen free-travel area — and many countries in the region have
built their economic competitiveness on low wages and low taxes. So the fear
shared by Central European politicians but also some Western European investors
is that the policies Mr. Macron promoted during his campaign, like harmonizing
tax regimes across the union and penalizing countries for exporting cheap labor,
could destroy Central Europe’s business model.
But while a majority of the Eastern European elite is suspicious of Mr. Macron’s
policies, some argue that the politics of low wages is the major reason for the
huge outflow of people from their region. In some countries, more than 10
percent of the population has left to work abroad. The International Monetary
Fund calculates that if the outflow continues at current rates, Central, Eastern
and southeastern Europe will lose around 9 percent of their expected gross
domestic product from 2015 to 2030.
But while the Merkel-Macron strategy presents a challenge to Central Europe’s
economy, the reality of a two-class Europe presents a strategic risk.
Few things have encapsulated the Eastern European anxiety about becoming
second-class citizens as explicitly as the recent scandal around “double
standards” for food. Eastern European consumers have discovered that some
products, like Nutella, for example, taste different in Austria than in Hungary.
Why? Tests have shown that multinational brands sometimes use cheaper
ingredients in foods sold on the east side of Europe’s erstwhile Iron Curtain.
The companies claim that they change ingredients to match local tastes, but the
Czech agriculture minister spoke for many when he said that the East is tired of
being “Europe’s garbage can.”
Central European resistance to the new Berlin-Paris axis may usher in a
different taste of Europe altogether. These countries now face a choice between
deeper integration on terms set by Germany and France or political
marginalization — and the fears of a two-tiered European Union could become
self-fulfilling prophecies. Unfortunately, the illiberal turn in Hungary and
Poland — marked by attempts to control the courts, tame independent news media,
and interfere in civil society (not to mention politicians’ base nationalistic
rhetoric) — has forced many Western Europeans to close their ears to what may be
in some instances legitimate Central European grievances.
The refugee crisis is a case in point. For Western Europeans, the Polish, Czech
and Hungarian refusal to accept resettlement quotas adopted by Brussels in 2015
demonstrates that the Eastern European countries lack the solidarity necessary
for the European Union. Eastern Europeans, on the other hand, rightly insist
that the solidarity imperative must not trump a democratic mandate, and who
belongs to a community is an existential question to be decided solely by
democratically elected governments. The problem is that Hungary’s hysterical
anti-refugee language has made it easy for other Europeans to dismiss Central
Europe’s legitimate fears as objectionable nationalism. But if the countries of
Central Europe face the same challenges, they don’t face them together. The
dream of a united Central Europe, embodied by the 1991 formation of the Visegrad
Group, no longer exists. Two of the group’s members, the Czech Republic and
Slovakia, are trying to distance themselves from the other two, Hungary and
Poland, which are bashing the European Union. Meanwhile, even as Poland and
Hungary share a hostility to Brussels, they are divided when it comes to the
relations with Russia.
The governments in the region faced with Merkel-Macron initiative to reorder the
union will soon be forced to choose between a future of deeper integration with
Western Europe, or a future where Central Europe is increasingly marginalized.
It’s a choice between Emmanuel Macron and Viktor Orban, Hungary’s hard-line
nationalist prime minister. The jury is out on which choice governments will
make. But Central Europe’s 20th-century experience may be summarized by the
adage, “If you are not at the table, you are on the menu.”
Remember the Population Bomb? It’s Still Ticking
Eugene Linden/The New York Times/June 25/17
In tiny Lesotho, a landlocked kingdom in southern Africa, about one-third of its
estimated two million people spent much of the past two years in danger of
starving because of the lingering effects of a drought. That is just the latest
woe afflicting this cursed nation, and just one example of how fragile the
future seems for Africa, large parts of which face the prospect of new famine
and, in consequence, further catastrophic displacement within and among their
growing populations. More than 40 years ago, I made Lesotho the centerpiece of a
book, “The Alms Race,” that explored why so many development projects kept
failing. I chose it because in 1974 it received more development aid per capita
than any other nation. It could also have been voted most likely to vindicate
Thomas Malthus’s warning in 1798 that human numbers would inevitably outrun the
resources on which our lives depend. Today, Lesotho’s experience since the 1970s
is an even stronger case study of what happens when development plans ignore the
reality that such efforts can be a recipe for exploding human numbers. The
kingdom’s sad history also offers an urgent, cautionary tale of how rapid
population growth can nullify development efforts that might otherwise let an
emerging nation endure periods of abnormal weather.
Now, as Lesotho’s story is being retold in many of the 17 other African nations
suffering drought, the Trump administration in particular should pay heed to
what Lesotho can teach us. Instead, it has announced that the United States will
cut its annual contribution to the United Nations Population Fund, which
promotes family planning. That reckless move — followed by the even more
reckless withdrawal of the United States from the Paris climate agreement —
could only increase the growing number of desperate migrants who for decades
have been fleeing famine and war in too many corners of the globe.
Even with only 1.2 million inhabitants in 1974, Lesotho’s leaders saw the
country was overpopulated. A 1966 British Colonial Office study estimated that
the land could support 400,000 people at best — a number Lesotho had reached by
1911. The country had few resources, and erosion was carrying away vast amounts
of topsoil while an annual population increase of about 2 percent created more
mouths to feed. Lesotho desperately needed access to contraception, but aid
organizations avoided getting involved because many Africans then saw birth
control as a conspiracy of the rich to keep population numbers in check.
What’s happened since? On the surface, Lesotho could seem to be a demographic
success story. True, its population has doubled, but its growth rate has fallen
and now is flat. This is not the typical “demographic transition” traceable to
improved incomes. It is traceable to AIDS. The average life span of about 50
years, the second lowest anywhere, is roughly the same as it was 45 years ago.
The rate of H.I.V. infection remains among the world’s highest, with nearly 23
percent of adults on antiretroviral medicines in 2014. That last statistic
points to the reason the kingdom has not completely collapsed. Foreign donors
have provided many of the medicines and medical facilities that keep H.I.V. from
doing its worst. Back in 1974, Lesotho was a ward of the international
community, dependent on development agencies and NGOs for many essentials. With
the amount of aid having waxed and waned, that remains true today. Even in 1974,
many development experts knew their programs might worsen Lesotho’s population
pressures, but hoped in vain that economic growth would outweigh the burden.
With only 7 percent of reproductive-age women having access to contraception in
the 1970s, Lesotho got its population explosion. By the 1990s, the annual growth
rate had soared to 2.75 percent. Belatedly, the government acknowledged the need
for family planning, but other barriers impeded it. During much of Lesotho’s
history, huge numbers of working-age men (40 percent in 1974) migrated to toil
in South African mines. Many refused to let their wives use contraception for
fear that the women would cheat on them during their absences. Moreover, the
men’s itinerant lives gave the families incentive to have more boys, to help
with the livestock and fields at home.
Over the years, dwindling mine jobs, urbanization, more aggressive outreach and
fear of H.I.V. slowly increased use of contraception to 16 percent in 1998, and
close to 60 percent in 2015.
Al-Jazeera and the Muslim Brotherhood
Eli Lake/Bloomberg/June 25/17
In 2014, Mohamed Fahmy, the former Cairo bureau chief for the Qatar-funded
television network began a 438-day sentence in an Egyptian prison on terrorism
charges and practicing unlicensed journalism. Today Fahmy is preparing a lawsuit
against his former employers. And while he is still highly critical of the
regime that imprisoned him, he also says the Egyptian government is correct when
it says al-Jazeera is really a propaganda channel for Islamists and an arm of
Qatari foreign policy. “The more the network coordinates and takes directions
from the government, the more it becomes a mouthpiece for Qatari intelligence,”
he told me in an interview Thursday. “There are many channels who are biased,
but this is past bias. Now al-Jazeera is a voice for terrorists.”Fahmy’s
testimony is particularly important now. Al-Jazeera is at the center of a crisis
ripping apart the Arab Gulf states. Earlier this month Saudi Arabia, the United
Arab Emirates, Egypt and Bahrain imposed a political and diplomatic blockade on
Qatar. As part of that blockade, al-Jazeera has been kicked out of those
countries. Al-Jazeera’s Arabic broadcasts have not met professional standards in
recent years. To start, the network still airs a weekly talk show from Muslim
Brotherhood theologian Yusuf al-Qaradawi. He has used his platform to argue that
Islamic law justifies terrorist attacks against Israelis and US soldiers. US
military leaders, such as retired Lt. General Ricardo Sanchez, who commanded
forces in the initial campaign to stabilize Iraq, have said publicly that al-Jazeera
reporters appeared to have advance knowledge of terrorist attacks. Fahmy told me
that in his research he has learned that instructions were given to journalists
not to refer to al Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria, al-Nusra, as a terrorist
organization.
He said Qatar’s neighbors were justified in banning al-Jazeera. “Al-Jazeera has
breached the true meaning of press freedom that I advocate and respect by
sponsoring these voices of terror like Yusuf al Qaradawi,” he said. “If al-Jazeera
continues to do that, they are directly responsible for many of these lone
wolves, many of these youth that are brain washed.”
Fahmy didn’t always have this opinion of his former employer. He began to change
his views while serving time. It started in the “scorpion block” of Egypt’s
notorious Tora prison. During his stay, he came to know some of Egypt’s most
notorious Islamists.
“When I started meeting and interviewing members of the Muslim Brotherhood and
their sympathizers, they specifically told me they had been filming protests and
selling it to al-Jazeera and dealing fluidly with the network and production
companies in Egypt associated with the network,” he said.
One example of al-Jazeera’s coordination with the Muslim Brotherhood revolves
around Muslim Brotherhood sit-ins in the summer of 2013, following the military
coup that unseated Mohammed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated president.
As part of Fahmy’s case against al-Jazeera, he took testimony from a former
security guard for the network and the head of the board of trustees for
Egyptian state television. Both testified that members of the Muslim Brotherhood
seized the broadcast truck al-Jazeera used to air the sit-ins that summer. In
other words, al-Jazeera allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to broadcast its own
protests.
The political and administrative Prince Mohammed bin Salman
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/June 25/17
The recent pledge of allegiance ceremony to Prince Mohammed bin Salman has been
landmark. Many in Saudi society believe that Prince Mohammed resembles his
founder father Abdulaziz as he is determined and decisive. He learnt management
since his early days thanks to his upbringing in the library belonging to his
father, King Salman, which is described as one of the most important libraries
in the world. King Salman had obliged all his sons to read one book a week.
When Prince Mohammed became a young man, he learnt management skills during his
work in Riyadh. The king wanted him to learn the real skills of management to
apply what he learnt in university after he attained a bachelor degree in law.
The king realized his son’s knowledgeable and ambitious characteristics, and saw
him as having a real plan. He then believed in his son’s talents and realized he
could become a distinguished political and administrative figure. He then paved
the way for him to work in the rough path of politics, and Prince Mohammed has
mastered it.
Prince Mohammed attracted attention from all during his years of work. He did
not know defeats, and he strongly and resolutely overcame challenges. The Saudis
have now pledged allegiance to him as new crown prince for this promising
country with its persistent youth.
In hate crimes against Muslims, focus less on media, more
on prosecution
Yara al-Wazir/Al Arabiya/June 25/17
Hate crimes against Muslims are higher today than they have ever been since
9/11. According to the FBI, 16.7 percent of religiously motivated hate crimes
are committed against Muslims in the United States. The UK shares a similarly
bleak vision- over the past five years, the UK has seen a 125 percent rise in
hate crimes against Muslims, and in 2016 alone, there was a 78 percent rise in
hate crimes against Muslims.
While Western media tends to avoid the topic of crimes against Muslim
completely, it occasionally treads, with extreme caution absolute sensitivity to
the feelings of the assailant, often replacing the words “terrorist” with
“mentally ill”.
The vast difference in terminology used by Western media in describing attacks
against Muslims, compared to attacks committed by Muslims, pushes some buttons
and immediately turns into a conversation that starts with “if this was
committed by a Muslim, the story would have been told differently”. It is time
to realize that the “us versus them” mentality does not achieve anything but
further division.
In the case of the attack on a mosque in Finsbury Park, London, earlier this
week, the Daily Mail editors decided to focus on the fact that the attacker was
“clean shaven”, and did not call it a terrorist offence in the early prints of
the story coverage.
Combatting double standards with facts
Yes, Western-media outlets clearly exhibit double standards in their coverage of
attacks by Muslims when compared to hate crimes against Muslims. What does
repeatedly highlighting this fact achieve other than further perpetuating the
divide within the Muslim and Western communities?
In a world that is becoming increasingly divided by labels – labels of faith, of
sect, of gender, of belief, Western-media for opts for divisive ‘click-bait’
headlines. In order to force media outlets to print stories of truth rather than
attractive headlines, the public must build bridges with the industry rather
than point fingers. Sharing relatable human stories of those who lose their
lives, such as their children, their volunteer work, and their passions – that
is ultimately what builds the strongest bridges. Fundamentally, Muslims want to
feel safe in their communities, both at home and abroad. The way to achieve this
harmony is to humanize the situation.
Hate crimes against Muslims will not stop if the media uses strong language to
instantly condemn the attackers, or when the media calls on ‘clean shaven white
men’ to apologies on behalf of ‘their people’. What will make hate crimes
against Muslims stop is when the criminals and attackers are prosecuted to the
extent of the law and given tough sentences. Only then will the media be forced
to use strong language to describe the attackers for what they are: criminal
terrorists motivated by hate.
Rather than taking to social media to rant about the coverage, the angry public
must take to their local elected officials and write to them to ensure that
criminals are fully prosecuted. In the case of Finsbury Park Mosque and in the
case of Nabra Hassanen, the Muslim teen who was raped and killed in Virginia
earlier this week, the men who committed the crimes were arrested. When they are
charged with a crime, and a conviction is carried out, the media will have no
choice but to report the stories and use the correct legal terminology – there
is no sugarcoating murder once there is a conviction.
Division is being used as a gruesome weapon to commit atrocities and make people
suffer. In a world that is increasingly divided and polarized, there is no
better time to build bridges and commonalities through empathy. The “us versus
them” mentality, conversations, and tweets of how crimes committed by Muslims
are portrayed versus crimes committed by a standard white male do not achieve
anywhere near as much as love. Hate cannot be driven out by hate.
In the unfortunate future that will inevitably see yet another crime committed
against Muslims, focus on the stories of the victims more, and on the portrayal
of the media less. Only then will public sentiment begin to understand that
before anything else, Muslims and Westerns share the same fundamental core
values: love, passion, family, and faith in a better world.
Gulf Crisis with Qatar Challenges the United States
Simon Henderson/The Washington Institute/June 25/17
Extremely tough conditions set by Saudi Arabia and the UAE for resolving the
diplomatic rift with Qatar could force Washington to choose sides in the crisis.
The list of thirteen demands to which Qatar must respond within ten days appears
to reflect longstanding desires -- although not publicly stated until very
recently -- by Riyadh and Abu Dhabi, of which Doha has been dismissive. Yet it
is hard to see how this list was formulated with the intention of achieving a
resolution rather than a complete undermining of diplomacy. There appears little
way Doha can save any face. Perhaps the list reflects an opening maximalist
salvo designed to prompt negotiation, but the prerequisite for agreement on all
points suggests otherwise.
Qatar has to:
Curb diplomatic ties with Iran. Only trade and commerce that complies with U.S.
and international sanctions will be permitted.
Declare the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamic State, al-Qaeda, and Lebanese
Hezbollah to be terrorist organizations and sever all ties.
Shut down Al Jazeera and other Qatar-linked news outlets.
Terminate the Turkish military presence in the country and end joint military
cooperation.
Stop all means of funding for those designated as terrorists by Saudi Arabia,
the UAE, Egypt, Bahrain, the United States, and other countries.
Hand over terrorists and wanted individuals from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt,
and Bahrain to their countries of origin and freeze their assets.
End interference in sovereign countries' internal affairs.
Stop all contacts with the political opposition in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt,
and Bahrain.
Pay reparations and compensation accounting for the consequences of Qatar's
policies in recent years.
Align itself with Gulf and Arab countries militarily, politically, and
economically.
Agree to all demands in ten days or the list becomes invalid.
Consent to monthly audits for the first year and then regularly over a total of
twelve years.
The list does not amount in so many words to a call for regime change in Qatar,
but rather to one for altered policies. Nevertheless, Doha is likely to view it
as pressure to remove Emir Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani and his father, Hamad bin
Khalifa, known as the "father-emir" and still regarded, especially by the UAE,
as the power behind the throne since his abdication in 2013.
The prominent role in the confrontation of four countries -- Saudi Arabia, the
UAE, Egypt, and Bahrain -- is easily explained. Saudi Arabia has long been
irritated by Qatar, the huge gas reserves of which give it financial
independence from the kingdom. The UAE has resented the support Qatar has given
to the Muslim Brotherhood, members of which have plotted against the ruling
family in Abu Dhabi, the leading emirate of the confederation. President Abdul
Fattah al-Sisi of Egypt overthrew the Muslim Brotherhood regime, which survived
in power for two years largely because it was propped up financially by Qatar.
Bahrain has had a history of land disputes with Qatar -- and while these were
resolved in 1994, ill will persists, encouraged by Riyadh.
Perhaps inconveniently for Washington, the demands make a point of associating
the United States with the crisis, a position that, exacerbated by mixed
messages from the White House, and the Defense and State Departments, may only
complicate its resolution. The wording does not give Washington an obvious role
in any diplomacy, and U.S. secretary of state Rex Tillerson had earlier said the
demands should be "reasonable and actionable."
Also worrying is the apparent lead being taken by the newly promoted Saudi crown
prince Muhammad bin Salman and his UAE counterpart, Sheikh Muhammad bin Zayed
al-Nahyan, until now perceived as a restraining influence on MbS's
impetuousness, exhibited by the military intervention in Yemen -- a side
consequence of which is the creation of al-Qaeda safe havens.
Whether Riyadh and Abu Dhabi lose support in international public opinion over
the nature of the demands will be interesting to see. While Al Jazeera has a
well-established reputation for troublemaking and poor journalism, some
countries may be thinking that -- however unhelpful the Qatari media might be --
the ending of Saudi support for madrasas across the world could be a useful
addition to any diplomacy.
For its part, the United States may well find itself under renewed pressure from
Saudi Arabia and the UAE to give up its use of the al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar,
which has played a key role in the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and
Syria.
Washington may need to do some tough talking with all its Gulf allies, and
quickly, to secure itself a role in the diplomacy, ameliorating the crisis and
stopping its escalation.
**Simon Henderson is the Baker Fellow and director of the Gulf and Energy Policy
Program at The Washington Institute, and coauthor of its 2017 Transition Paper
Rebuilding Alliances and Countering Threats in the Gulf.
Preparing to Counter ISIS 2.0: European CT Efforts Since
Charlie Hebdo
Gilles de Kerchove/The Washington Institute/June 25/17
Watch the European Union's counterterrorism coordinator discuss plans to combat
the Islamic State after the caliphate falls.
On June 23, 2017, Gilles de Kerchove addressed a Policy Forum at The Washington
Institute. A senior Belgian official and the EU counterterrorism coordinator,
Kerchove previously served as director of justice and home affairs in the
Council Secretariat of the European Union from 1995 to 2007. Following are his
prepared remarks.
Daesh (aka the Islamic State) is being pushed out of vast swathes of the
territory it once controlled and, despite propaganda proclaiming otherwise, the
group's military defeat in Iraq and Syria is inevitable. But defeat in
traditional military terms will not spell the end of the threat we face on both
sides of the Atlantic.
Our enemies are adapting to their new reality and, as the physical caliphate
collapses, the virtual caliphate is rising from the flames. ISIS 2.0 will not be
beaten by military might alone. The European Union and its member states are
working hard to tackle this increasingly hidden, often crude, and unpredictable
threat.
In January 2015, the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris marked a step change in
European counterterrorism cooperation. Just one month after the attack, European
heads of state and government met in Brussels and committed to an ambitious
blueprint for enhanced cooperation across three broad policy areas: (1) ensuring
the security of citizens; (2) preventing radicalization and safeguarding values;
and (3) cooperating with our international partners. Impressive progress has
been made by the EU and its member states across all three portfolios.
Further still, recognizing the political importance of the issue, the president
of the European Commission has appointed a Commissioner for the Security Union,
Sir Julian King, in order to bring greater political focus to the commission's
efforts.
Our enemies should be under no doubt that our collective capability and our
collective resolve to defeat them and their heinous ideology are infinitely
stronger than theirs. Last night (June 22), the heads of state and government of
the EU met again in Brussels and committed to yet further cooperation and even
greater ambition in this regard.
Ensuring the Security of Citizens
We have seen an unprecedented leap forward in information exchange,
interoperability, and in police and intelligence cooperation and capability.
This has taken place both through EU agencies such as Europol and its new
European Counter Terrorism Centre (ECTC) and through structures outside of the
EU such as the Counter Terrorism Group (CTG).
The creation of new capabilities through legislation such as the Passenger Name
Record (PNR) directive is making powerful new tools available across the Union.
PNR, for example, allows member states to process data provided by airlines in
order to identify high-risk travelers. PNR is no silver bullet, but it can
disrupt our adversaries from traveling freely across Europe by helping to
identify both known and unknown terrorist fighters traveling to or returning
from conflict zones.
Other tools such as the Schengen Information System II (SIS II) have been
enhanced and hold the details of thousands of foreign terrorist fighters. This
provides further opportunities to identify, disrupt, or monitor terrorists
moving throughout the EU. It allows for richer intelligence pictures to be
generated and a framework for efficient cooperation at the border. For example,
one case saw a foreign terrorist fighter trying to return to the Netherlands
through Turkey and Germany. The individual was identified through SIS II, and
Dutch authorities were able to stop him immediately for questioning upon arrival
at Schiphol Airport.
The legislative response to the threat has been measured and effective. Laws
have been tightened across the EU to criminalize travel for terrorist purposes,
to tackle terrorist finance, and to make it far more difficult for terrorists to
acquire firearms and explosive precursors and detonators.
Borders have been made more secure, and mandatory checks -- at the external
border -- of all persons, including EU citizens, have been introduced, subject
to closely monitored transition periods.
These collective efforts, among numerous others, have clearly had a positive
effect on the security of our citizens. The trend toward cruder methods of
attack remains a challenge, but it does indicate that firearms and explosives
have indeed become harder to access. The change in the numbers of Europeans
traveling to the conflict zone can also, in part, be attributed to the steps the
EU has taken. The numbers are stark: Those Europeans traveling to join Daesh
reached almost 4,800 by the end of 2015. In 2016, fewer than 100 EU residents
were able to reach Syria and Iraq, and little more than a few dozen have been
successful in 2017.
Preventing Radicalization and Safeguarding Values
The EU has been leading efforts in the virtual space since July 2015 through the
creation of Europol's Internet Referral Unit (EU IRU). This unique multilingual
capability has been working to reduce terrorist and extremist online propaganda
on global platforms and to provide operational support to high-profile
investigations. During its first dedicated two-day operation, the team analyzed
and actioned over 1,800 pieces of Daesh- and al-Qaeda-affiliated content in nine
different languages hosted by thirty-five different platforms.
The creation of the Internet Forum, which sees EU interior ministers and
Internet companies working together to tackle the online threat, presents a
significant opportunity to tackle ISIS 2.0. We have built strong foundations and
ambition is high, but a step change is indeed necessary to meet the scale of the
challenge. The Internet companies, led by Facebook, are already working on
technical innovations to achieve this, including methods of detecting terrorist
content automatically. The path to achieving this will not be easy, but it must
be achieved if we are to protect our citizens and, crucially, our children.
The Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) connects over 2,400 frontline
practitioners across the EU working to counter radicalization across all
sectors. These deep subject matter experts (including on the education, health,
and prison sectors) bring their experience and knowledge together to learn from
each other and to develop actionable recommendations for policymakers. The
network has been strengthened with €25 million additional funding over four
years and established as a Centre of Excellence for the EU.
Work to support member states in tackling prison radicalization is under way
with funding made available for rehabilitation and deradicalization programs,
risk-assessment tools, and training.
With an eye to the future, work to improve education and youth-employment
prospects is also an essential pillar of our work in this area. Programs such as
Erasmus+ have been strengthened to foster inclusion and promotion of fundamental
values. Significant funding has been made available for new policies and
projects and for grassroots initiatives.
International Cooperation
Political and security cooperation with our partners in the region is at an
all-time high and is more important than ever. We have deployed counterterrorism
experts to EU delegations in high-priority partner countries and are developing
comprehensive CT-assistance programs with countries such as Tunisia, Lebanon,
and Jordan. Our EU agencies, including Eurojust, Europol, Frontex, and the
European Police College (CEPOL), have been reinforced in order to support these
programs.
And of course, it goes without saying that the United States is a crucial
partner in all of our activity. We have concluded a PNR agreement with the
United States and maintain highly effective access to the Terrorist Finance
Tracking Program (TFTP) through requests made by Europol. The TFTP has proven a
very valuable tool in the investigations into the recent terrorist attacks in
Europe. There has been a considerable rise in requests, which resulted in a high
number of intelligence leads -- more than 35,000 since the EU-U.S. TFTP
Agreement in 2010 (more than 80 percent of those leads were provided in 2015 and
2016 in reaction to the terrorist attacks). Almost half of these relate to
foreign fighters. More broadly, the level of information exchange through
Europol and Eurojust and, of course, bilaterally with the member states is
essential to our tackling the threat both in the United States and Europe and
around the world.
Conclusion
While some attacks have penetrated our collective defenses with tragic
consequences, we can be certain that our collective actions have contributed to
numerous plots being disrupted, and vulnerable citizens have been prevented from
being radicalized or traveling for jihad in the battlefields of Syria or Iraq.
Crucially, if we are to face down the threat of ISIS 2.0, we will need to scale
up our efforts to tackle the virtual caliphate. The EU is well positioned, but
we will need our international partners and, most important, the online industry
to step up to the mark. As the British prime minister said just this month,
enough is indeed enough. The Internet giants, who are such a central part of our
societies, must bring their full capabilities to the table and help us safeguard
our children and vulnerable citizens from false religious narratives and from
violent extremism.
We have achieved a significant amount in a very short period of time, but there
remains much to do. We must act strategically and we must act together to share
the burden. Our priorities for tackling ISIS 2.0 must now include defeating its
agents in the virtual caliphate and ensuring the safety of our citizens in the
face of the increasingly unpredictable and hidden acts of terrorism that the
virtual caliphate inspires. We must also develop new methods of analyzing big
data and using artificial intelligence to assist us. Finally, we would be
foolish to simply focus on the short to medium term. True success against ISIS
2.0 will require the defeat of its delusional ideology and the victory of our
shared values. The European Union will remain in support of our member states
and our international partners for the long haul. Together, we have seen graver
challenges than this before and triumphed in the face of them.
Defusing the Electricity Crisis in Gaza -- For Now
Katherine Bauer and Ghaith al-Omari//The Washington Institute/June 25/17
The recent deal to restore electricity to the territory will ease short-term
concerns, but given the turbulent Palestinian and regional political scene, a
more sustainable solution will require setting up independent mechanisms for
utility provision.
On June 22, the Gaza Power Plant (GPP) came back online, following a shipment of
diesel fuel from Egypt earlier in the week, offering a temporary reprieve from
the crisis that had left Gaza residents with as little as three hours of
electricity per day. The news came just as Israel completed an incremental
reduction in electricity provision from its own grid to Gaza, at the request of
the Palestinian Authority (PA). Renewed electricity generation from the GPP
should offset the reduction from Israel.
The power plant -- one of Gaza's three electricity sources, which also include
imported electricity from Israel and Egypt -- has been off-line since Qatari and
Turkish donations ran out in April. For at least a number of weeks, the line
from Egypt has also been down for technical reasons.
Notably, payment for the Egyptian fuel has reportedly come from Hamas, rather
than the United Arab Emirates, as some had speculated, and likely at least in
part from electricity payments collected by the Hamas-controlled Gaza
Electricity Distribution Company. Indeed, one source of the current crisis has
been Hamas's refusal to transfer electricity payments to Ramallah to cover PA
costs. Previously, Hamas had regularly transferred funds to Ramallah to cover
fuel purchases for the plant but stopped in January when the PA said it would no
longer pass on associated tax refunds. Taxes double the costs of the fuel, and
reports indicate Hamas could not cover the full amount.
Regarding the Egyptian delivery, funds are suspected to have come from
electricity payments to the utility when the cost was being covered by Qatar and
Turkey. The PA, for its part, had until late April been fully paying for Israeli
electricity exports to Gaza, estimated at 40 million Israeli shekels (about $11
million) per month -- as well as those to the West Bank -- from PA customs
revenues collected by Israel on imports into both territories.
Political Context
These developments are taking place in a wider context. Beginning June 4, Gaza's
new Hamas leader, Yahya al-Sinwar, led a delegation in meetings with Egypt's
General Intelligence branch. The delegation also met with Mohammad Dahlan -- an
Abu Dhabi-based former Fatah Central Committee member who was expelled from the
movement by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas but continues to wield
considerable influence among its Gaza members -- along with some of his aides.
The meetings reportedly resulted in understandings between Hamas and Dahlan,
under Egyptian auspices, whereby Dahlan will have a large role in managing
Gaza's external relations and in resolving its humanitarian situation. The fuel
shipment is seen as an outcome of these understandings.
On one level, this unlikely cooperation has a certain logic. Hamas, squeezed by
Abbas's recent steps to reduce support for Gaza and deprived of Qatari backing,
needs the relief that can only come through Egypt. Dahlan, who has been steadily
marginalized by Abbas since last year's Fatah General Conference, would
strengthen his standing among Gazans and once again become an indispensable
figure on the Palestinian national scene. Both sides also want to weaken Abbas's
standing. Egypt, which has no interest in dealing with another round of
Israel-Hamas hostilities, will benefit from the de-escalation that would result
from mitigating the electricity crisis and will welcome a stronger role in Gaza
for its ally Dahlan and a reduced role for Qatar. Egypt has also reportedly
reached its own understandings with Hamas regarding securing the Gaza-Egypt
borders.
This cooperation, however, is unlikely to be sustainable. While Hamas's and
Dahlan's interests may occasionally intersect, as they did here, a number of
factors could hinder the conversion of these kinds of cooperative steps into a
full-fledged partnership. Principally, the ultimate objectives of the two
parties are in conflict, with each desiring primacy in Gaza and ultimately at
the national Palestinian level. Moreover, any deeper cooperation will have to
overcome their mutual distrust resulting from decades of often-bloody conflict.
In the wider regional context, while both Egypt and the UAE -- Dahlan's main
regional supporter -- would welcome developments supplanting Qatar's role in
Gaza, both are vigorously anti-Islamist and unlikely to accept any long-term
arrangements that would leave Hamas in charge of Gaza. Any fundamental shift
would require that the main protagonists, and their regional backers, make key
concessions, none of which seems to be likely at the moment.
Moreover, Abbas, whose authority would be severely challenged by such an
alliance, is unlikely to sit idly by. He has proven skilled in the past at
maintaining his relevance in the face of internal and external pressures, and is
feeling energized and empowered by the Trump administration's robust interest in
reviving the peace process.
Conclusion
The recent developments regarding electricity in Gaza reflect a convergence of
interests between Hamas and Dahlan under terms also beneficial to Egypt. But
this confluence must contend with deeper Palestinian and regional dynamics that
are unlikely to be overcome any time soon, if ever. Furthermore, even if all
three sources of power to Gaza return online and the status quo ante is
restored, the Strip will continue to suffer from frequent outages. Current
demand is estimated to be twice that of supply. For a number of years, Gazans
have enjoyed eight hours of electricity a day, at best.
A more sustainable resolution of Gaza's electricity problems would require
setting up independent structures and mechanisms for utility provision, perhaps
drawing on lessons from World Bank efforts to establish the area's Coastal
Municipalities Water Utility as well as considering more efficient sources of
electricity, such as increased imports from Israel. Although the recent
developments seem to have resolved the immediate Gaza electricity crisis and
significantly lowered the chances of a new Gaza war this summer -- to the
benefit of all -- they constitute a band-aid likely at some point to fall off.
**Katherine Bauer is the Blumenstein-Katz Family Fellow at The Washington
Institute. Ghaith al-Omari is an Institute senior fellow and author of its
recent report Governance as a Path to Palestinian Political Rejuvenation.