LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS
BULLETIN
June 24/17
Compiled &
Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The
Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias/english.june24.17.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily
English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2016
Bible Quotations For Today
On the eighth day they came to circumcise the child, and
they were going to name him Zechariah after his father. But his mother said,
‘No; he is to be called John
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 01/57-66/:"Now the time came
for Elizabeth to give birth, and she bore a son. Her neighbours and relatives
heard that the Lord had shown his great mercy to her, and they rejoiced with
her. On the eighth day they came to circumcise the child, and they were going to
name him Zechariah after his father. But his mother said, ‘No; he is to be
called John.’They said to her, ‘None of your relatives has this name.’Then they
began motioning to his father to find out what name he wanted to give him. He
asked for a writing-tablet and wrote, ‘His name is John.’ And all of them were
amazed. Immediately his mouth was opened and his tongue freed, and he began to
speak, praising God. Fear came over all their neighbours, and all these things
were talked about throughout the entire hill country of Judea. All who heard
them pondered them and said, ‘What then will this child become?’ For, indeed,
the hand of the Lord was with him."
Now you, my friends, are children of the promise, like
Isaac
Letter to the Galatians 04/21/31/5/01/:"Tell me, you who desire to be subject to
the law, will you not listen to the law? For it is written that Abraham had two
sons, one by a slave woman and the other by a free woman. One, the child of the
slave, was born according to the flesh; the other, the child of the free woman,
was born through the promise. Now this is an allegory: these women are two
covenants. One woman, in fact, is Hagar, from Mount Sinai, bearing children for
slavery. Now Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present
Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children. But the other woman
corresponds to the Jerusalem above; she is free, and she is our mother. For it
is written, ‘Rejoice, you childless one, you who bear no children, burst into
song and shout, you who endure no birth pangs; for the children of the desolate
woman are more numerous than the children of the one who is married.’ Now you,
my friends, are children of the promise, like Isaac. But just as at that time
the child who was born according to the flesh persecuted the child who was born
according to the Spirit, so it is now also. But what does the scripture say?
‘Drive out the slave and her child; for the child of the slave will not share
the inheritance with the child of the free woman.’So then, friends, we are
children, not of the slave but of the free woman. For freedom Christ has set us
free. Stand firm, therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery."
Titles For Latest LCCC
Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on June
23-24/17
Massive Iranian funding for Hezbollah & Other
anti-Israel terror groups revealed/Yonah Jeremy Bob/Jerusalem Post/June 23/17
List of demands on Qatar by Saudi Arabia, other Arab nations/Associated
Press/June 23/17
Gulf crisis: UAE accuses Qatar of 'leaking' list of 13 demands/Middle East
Eye/June 23/17
Iran is flexing its muscles/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/ArabNews/June 23/ 2017
The rise of Mohammed bin Salman: Alarm bells should be ringing/Jamal Elshayyal/MEE/June
23/17
Turkey Seizes Assyrian Monastery Property/ Ygar Gltekin/Assyrian International
News Agency/June 23/17
Kurdish Referendum: What Mullah Mustafa Might Do/Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/June
23/17/
The domestic base of terror in Tehran/Brenda Shaffer/Al Arabiya/June 23/17
Google's YouTube - Soap Box for Terrorists/Ruthie Blum/Gatestone Institute/June
23/17
Terrorism is winning in Europe/Nadav Eyal|/Ynetnews/June 23/17
Titles For Latest
Lebanese Related News published on
June 23-24/17
Nasrallah: Israel Avoiding 'Costly'
War, Tens of Thousands of Foreign Fighters May Join Future Conflict
Aoun meets Chinese Foreign Minister: Lebanon keen on boosting bilateral ties
Bassil, Chinese Foreign Minister tackle current developments
Geagea tackles developments with Egyptian Ambassador
IS Reportedly Executes Hizbullah Member after Killing Two
Syrian Held for Sex Trafficking in Lebanon Released on Bail
U.N. Rejects Israeli Accusations of Hizbullah Posing as Green NGO
British Minister for Security from Lebanon: ‘Your Security is our Security’
Hariri Meets Geagea over Suhoor, Stresses Necessity to Address Livelihood Issues
Man behind Car Bombs that Hit Lebanon Arrested
Army Grips Top Arms Dealers in Arsal Raid
Miqati: Outcome of Baabda Meeting for Country's Benefit
Chants Against Saudi Arabia as Iran Marks Jerusalem Day
President Aoun lauds Chinese support to Lebanon
Massive Iranian funding for Hezbollah & Other anti-Israel terror groups revealed
Lebanon: ‘Consultative Meeting’ Approves Government’s Plan Of Action
Titles For Latest
LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
June 22-23/17
ISIS Cell Captured in Cairo, Seven Armed Men Killed in Assiut
Saudi Says Attack on Grand Mosque Foiled as 11 Hurt in Blast Nearby
N. Korea Accuses US of 'Smear Campaign' over Student's Death
Russia Warships and Sub Fire Cruise Missiles at Syria
472 Civilians Dead in Month of US-Led Syria Strikes
Qatar Ideal First Diplomatic Crisis for Oilman Tillerson
Turkey Sends First Cargo Ship with Aid for Qatar
Suicide Bomber Kills 9 in Western Iraq
Local Qaida Leader in Yemen Killed by US Air Strike
Iran Nuclear Chief Urges West to Save Historic Deal
Merkel Invites European Leaders to G20 Warm-Up Meeting
Latest Lebanese
Related News published on
June 23-24/17
Nasrallah: Israel
Avoiding 'Costly' War, Tens of Thousands of Foreign Fighters May Join Future
Conflict
Naharnet/June 23/17/Hizbullah chief
Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah reassured Friday that Israel does not intend to wage a
war on Lebanon in the near future but warned that “tens of thousands” of foreign
fighters could fight alongside the “axis of resistance” in any future conflict.
“Israel is refraining from waging wars on Lebanon and Gaza because it knows very
well that such a move would be costly due to the resistance's capabilities,”
said Nasrallah in a televised speech marking the annual Quds Day. Israeli
Defense Minister Avigdor “Lieberman has said that Israel does not intend to wage
a war, 'neither in fall, nor in summer, nor in winter, nor in the North and nor
in the South.' The person saying this is the enemy's minister of war and he
knows that wars on Gaza or Lebanon will not lead him to victories,” Nasrallah
added. "The Israeli enemy should know that if it launches an attack on Syria or
Lebanon, it's unknown whether the fighting will stay just between Lebanon and
Israel, or Syria and Israel," Nasrallah added. "I'm not saying countries would
intervene directly -- but it would open the door for hundreds of thousands of
fighters from all around the Arab and Islamic world to participate in this fight
-- from Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan," he said. Hizbullah fighters
from Lebanon, and others from Iran, Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan are battling
alongside regime forces in Syria to defend the government of President Bashar
al-Assad. The powerful Shiite Lebanese group and Israel have fought many battles
including a devastating 34-day war in 2006 that killed 1,200 people in Lebanon,
mainly civilians, and 160 Israelis, mostly soldiers. Turning to the
Saudi-Iranian tensions, the Hizbullah chief said “the Saudi regime is too weak
and impotent to be able to wage a war on Iran.” “Iran, as the main backer of
resistance movements in the region, is facing political pressures and economic
sanctions aimed at isolating it. The new isolation attempts started at the
Riyadh summit with the aim of bringing the war to Iran through the takfiris,”
Nasrallah noted. “The new Saudi crown prince had threatened to bring the war to
Iran and this means using the Wahhabi, takfiri groups to target Iran,” he added,
linking Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's remarks to the unprecedented bombings
in Tehran earlier this month that were claimed by the jihadist Islamic State
group. As for the situation in Syria, Nasrallah pointed out that “thanks to
resilience, Syria has overcome the threat of toppling the regime, and should the
military developments continue in the same manner, Syria will overcome the
threat of partitioning and isolation.”
Aoun meets Chinese Foreign Minister: Lebanon keen on
boosting bilateral ties
Fri 23 Jun 2017/NNA - President Michel Aoun stressed Lebanon's keenness to
strengthen bilateral relations with China in all spheres, lauding China's stand
beside Lebanon in regional and international podiums. "China's ranking the first
exporter to the Lebanese markets gives further impetus to boost cooperation
between Lebanon and China," President Aoun said in front of Chinese Foreign
Minister Wang Yi, who called on him at the Baabda palace on Friday. Aoun pledged
that Lebanon shall play its full role in the advancement of the "One Belt One
Road" initiative Project launched by Chinese President Xi Jinping, notably that
the future of relations between countries will be set through building bridges,
rather than building walls. The President also thanked China for its "support to
the Lebanese army and security forces and its contribution to the development of
the Lebanese economy."
Aoun briefed the Chinese Minister on Lebanon's stance vis-a-vis" the current
regional developments, highlighting "the negative repercussions of the Syrian
crisis on the situation in general." Aoun said he hoped that a political
solution will be reached soon in Syria, underlining the substantial importance
of cooperation among countries in eradicating terrorism. At the beginning of the
meeting, Yi conveyed to Aoun a message from Chinese President Xi Jinping,
underlining the "friendship ties between Lebanon and China and the necessity of
boosting bilateral relations between the two countries." The Chinese President
hailed Lebanon's typical characteristic of national coexistence among its
various sons, in the framework of unity and solidarity. He reiterated China's
constant support to Lebanon's independence, sovereignty and territorial
integrity. The Chinese Minister also expressed his country's readiness to
continue to provide aid to Lebanon to alleviate the ramifications of the massive
Syrian influx into Lebanon, as a result of the Syrian crisis. Both Lebanon and
China see eye to eye over the need to find a political solution to the Syrian
crisis, he said. On the other hand, Aoun President Aoun contacted the new Greek
Catholic Patriarch, Youssef al-Abssi, congratulating him on his election and
wishing him "success in his new ecclesiastical duties." On the advent of the
Fitr Eid, Aoun received a congratulatory cable from Jordan's Monarch AbdullaH II
Ben El-Hussein.
Bassil, Chinese Foreign
Minister tackle current developments
Fri 23 Jun 2017/NNA - Foreign Minister, Gebran Bassil, met on Friday at Villa
Boustros with his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, over most recent developments in
the region, in addition to the bilateral relations. Speaking at a joint press
conference, Minister Bassil thanked China for its relentless support to Lebanon,
in terms of its contributions within UNIFIL in the South and maintaining
stability and tranquility there and across all Lebanon. Bassil renewed Lebanon's
commitment to the full implementation of UN Resolution #1701 in all its clauses.
Turning to the Syrian refugee crisis, Bassil highlighted the brunt of the Syrian
displacement into Lebanon, and the huge number of Syrian influx, the matter that
poses a real existential threat to Lebanon's security, prosperity, stability,
future and community. Bassil thus called for more international aid to assist
Lebanon endure the impact of the Syrian refugee crisis, saying that the best
feasible and lasting solution lies in the gradual return of the Syrian refugees
to their homeland, even prior to the political solution. He also pointed out
that Lebanon adopts the policy of non-interference in other countries' affairs,
stressing the paramount importance of unity and resolving conflicts through
dialogue. Minister Yi, for his part, stressed China's relentless support to
Lebanon's efforts in maintaining its sovereignty and territorial integrity. He
also lauded Lebanon as a distinguished country in the region, with its
harmonious coexistence amongst its different religions and communities. Yi hoped
that Lebanon's experience of peaceful coexistence amongst the various
communities will serve as a model for resolving issues in the Middle East.
Turning to the Syrian issue, Yi stressed the necessity of resolving the Syrian
crisis through a political solution.
Geagea tackles developments with Egyptian Ambassador
Fri 23 Jun 2017/NNA - Lebanese Forces leader, Samir Geagea, met in Meerab on
Friday with Egyptian Ambassador to Lebanon, Nazih Al-Najari, with talks between
the pair featuring high on the most recent political developments at the
regional and international levels.
IS Reportedly Executes Hizbullah
Member after Killing Two
Naharnet/June 23/17/The jihadist
Islamic State group has killed three Hizbullah members in Syria, one of whom was
executed, media reports said on Friday. The three Hizbullah members were in a
car that fell in an IS ambush in the Syrian desert east of Palmyra on Thursday,
reports said. Pro-Hizbullah media reports said the three members of the Lebanese
group were a medic and two logistical support officers and that they had lost
their way before falling into the ambush.The IS group's propaganda agency had on
Thursday published a video showing the bodies of two Hizbullah members as well
as the captive militant who was eventually executed. A Lebanese ID that appears
in the video belongs to 29-year-old Rami Bassam al-Asaad. Hizbullah has
announced the death of five of its members over the past hours, identifying them
as Rami Bassam al-Asaad, Rabih Afif Ollaiq, Ali Abbas Badran, Ahmed Haidar al-Asmar
and Ali Dandash Dandash who was described as a commander.
Syrian Held for Sex Trafficking in Lebanon Released on Bail
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June
23/17/A Syrian national accused of operating one of the largest sex trafficking
rings in Lebanon has been released on bail, a judicial source told the AFP news
agency on Friday. "The Mount Lebanon Criminal Court, headed by Judge Faisal
Haidar, decided to release Imad Rihawi on bail for 20 million Lebanese pounds,"
the source said. The source specified that Rihawi was released on Thursday and
that the charges against him were still being upheld. For years, Rihawi had
managed Chez Maurice and Silver, two of the most infamous brothels in Maameltein,
a coastal town known as Lebanon's red light district. Prostitution is illegal in
Lebanon, and police shuttered both locations in April 2016 in one of the most
high-profile busts the country has seen. At least 75 women -- mostly Syrian --
were set free. People in Lebanon were shocked by the horrifying ordeal, as well
as by accusations that police forces were complicit and that a gynecologist had
carried out at least 200 abortions on the trapped women. At the time of the
bust, security forces only identified Rihawi by his initials and said that he
fled to Syria after his operation was broken up. But he dramatically handed
himself in to Lebanese security forces on live television in May 2016.
U.N. Rejects Israeli Accusations of Hizbullah Posing as Green NGO
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June
23/17/The United Nations on Friday rejected Israeli claims that Hizbullah
militants were establishing observation posts along the border under the cover
of an environmental NGO. The Israeli military on Thursday published pictures of
a building near the Israeli-Lebanese border supposedly controlled by an
organization called Green Without Borders. The U.N. peacekeeping mission UNIFIL
reported that Green Without Borders members have planted trees in the area, but
it "has not observed any unauthorized armed persons at the locations or found
any basis to report a violation of resolution 1701," said U.N. spokeswoman Eri
Kaneko. Israel's ambassador to the U.N., Danny Danon, had sent a letter of
protest to the Security Council with images of the alleged observation posts and
maps locating them. Dannon described the activities as a "dangerous provocation"
and said Hizbullah was carrying out reconnaissance activities near the Blue Line
border demarcation while posing as a civilian organization. Israel fought a
month-long war against Hizbullah in 2006, killing more than 1,200 Lebanese,
mostly civilians, and more than 160 Israelis, mostly soldiers. Resolution 1701
was adopted to end the war, calling for full respect of the Blue Line.
British Minister for
Security from Lebanon: ‘Your Security is our Security’
Naharnet/June 23/17/Minister of
State for Security the Rt Hon Ben Wallace MP has ended a two day visit to
Lebanon, where he highlighted the strength of the UK’s security partnership with
Lebanon, a press release said on Friday. During his two-day, the Minister met
Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil and Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq; the
heads of the Armed Forces, Internal Security Forces and General Security, as
well as other senior security chiefs; and witnessed UK projects to support the
Lebanese Armed Forces and Internal Security Forces.
The UK has committed $100m since 2011 to supporting Lebanese security through
our partnership with Lebanese security forces, it said.
During his visit to Hamat Air Base, Minister Wallace learned how the LAF
are effectively countering Daesh in the Qalamoun; discussed UK support to secure
100% of Lebanon’s border with Syria by 2019; and observed a live training
demonstration on counter IED, as well as a new LAF training component on
International Humanitarian Law, where he addressed LAF officers and spoke to
them about the important of respect for humanitarian law and human rights. By
2019, the UK will have trained around 11,000 soldiers for frontline operations
across Lebanon. The Security Minister discussed
internal security with Director General Imad Othman, and visited the ISF Academy
where the UK is supporting the establishment of a strategic planning capability
and helping train officers. He also visited the UK-supported model police
stations at Ras Beirut, and the sites of the next model police stations across
Hamra; and discussed with the Inspector General how improved and increased
inspections across ISF police stations and facilities would improve
professionalism, standards, and human rights. With
Minister Bassil, he discussed bilateral relations, recent tragic events in the
UK, and ongoing security cooperation. At the end of
his visit Minister Wallace said: “It is a privilege to visit Lebanon for the
first time. More than ever, the UK is committed to
working with countries in this region and around the whole world to tackle head
on the threat from terrorism and violent extremism.
The UK has provided $100m of security assistance to Lebanon since 2011. Lebanon
is a strong and effective partner for the UK on security and counter-terrorism,
and I leave Lebanon impressed by the commitment and determination of Lebanon’s
security agencies. Our investments in Lebanese security are specifically
designed to safeguard Lebanese stability and ensure the Lebanese state has the
means to defend Lebanon 24/7. To finish, I would like
to say this: the UK and Lebanon have a shared interest in security, stability
and prosperity, standing side by side in the face of terrorism. We are committed
to ensuring Lebanon’s sovereignty is maintained, from the border regions at
Tfail to the streets of Beirut.”
Hariri Meets Geagea over Suhoor, Stresses Necessity to
Address Livelihood Issues
Naharnet/June 23/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri held a meeting with Lebanese
Forces leader Samir Geagea over a Suhoor invitation at the latter's residence in
Maarab, the National News Agency reported on Friday. “We have always visited
Geagea to coordinate positions mainly when the electoral law was being prepared.
The Lebanese Forces had a major role (in devising a new vote law) through MP
(George) Adwan and in coordination with Geagea. Our (al-Mustaqbal Movement)
relations with the LF are strategic,” said Hariri in a statement Hariri. Hariri
who was on a visit to the Qalamoun area before heading to Maarab, arrived for
Geagea's Suhoor invitation shortly after midnight, he said: “Our meeting today
was agreed a while ago, but the people of Qalamoun have kept until after
midnight.”The PM stressed the “need to address livelihood matters that concern
the citizens and provide them with a decent life. That is why we will seek to
secure electricity 24/24 and to reduce the tarrif.”For his part, Geagea said: “I
welcome Hariri as a friend before I welcome him as a Prime Minister. We both
agree on the general strategic issues.”
Man behind Car Bombs that Hit Lebanon Arrested
Naharnet/June 23/17/Army intelligence agents have arrested a man who played key
roles in several bomb and rocket attacks that hit Lebanon in recent years, media
reports said. The reports identified the man as Arsal resident Mohammed
Badreddine al-Krenbi, saying he has been referred to the judiciary on charges of
“booby-trapping cars, firing rockets and planting bombs in several regions.”
“Krenbi has confessed that the booby-trapped cars he prepared were used in most
of the suicide attacks and bombings that rocked several parts of Lebanon,” LBCI
television said. Voice of Lebanon radio (93.3) said the suspect was arrested as
he was heading from Beirut to his hometown Arsal two days ago.
Army Grips Top Arms Dealers in Arsal Raid
Naharnet/June 23/17/The Lebanese army arrested two prominent arms dealers in the
northeastern border town of Arsal, media reports said on Friday. Early today,
the army launched raids on the place of residence of a suspect identified as
Bachir al-Hujeiri. He was arrested amid heavy gunfire. Another suspect named
Hani al-Diab was also detained. Both detainees are senior arms dealer who
smuggled weapons to terrorist organizations, said LBCI. VDL (93.3) quoted a
security source as saying: “The Army Intelligence staged raids in Arsal and
arrested al-Hujeiri and Diab both of whom are senior weapons dealers who trade
it with terrorist organizations.” An official army statement said Hujeiri and
Diab were also involved in "smuggling rockets to the terrorist groups."
Miqati: Outcome of Baabda Meeting for Country's Benefit
Naharnet/June 23/17/Ex-PM Najib Miqati hailed on Friday the outcome of the
Baabda consultative meeting that convened a day earlier at the invitation of
President Michel Aoun, the National News Agency reported on Friday. “We highly
appreciate the outcome of the meeting held at the presidential palace which
emphasized the implementation of the National Accord document (Taef Agreement).
We continue to emphasize the need to implement the constitution in full in order
to demonstrate the pros and cons and then hold a national workshop to discuss
what must be amended in light of experience and practice,” said Miqati in a
statement. “Some of what we heard in the past period, of sectarian views and
positions during the discussion of the new election law, was a cause of concern
to the overwhelming majority of Lebanese, including us," added Miqati. “But, the
Baabda meeting has come to stress on the unity of the Lebanese nation, the
establishment of equality and the formation of the national commission for the
abolition of sectarianism which rectified things by drawing a clear road map
that rejects any coup against the constitution and the constants that the
Lebanese have unanimously agreed upon,” he added.
Turning to the economic part of the Baabda meeting, Miqati said: “It was good to
emphasize a clear road map for the implementation of necessary projects and
address the dilemmas. "The coming period must see the
return to known norms in the implementation of basic projects, especially those
that arrange long-term commitments to the state. The government's recent move to
refer the electricity file to the tender department is a good step to rectify
what we have complained about.”“The Baabda meeting sets an important road map
for the coming period. The implementation of this plan remains the main
challenge facing President Michel Aoun,” he concluded.
Political parties represented in the government convened in a consultative
meeting at the presidential palace on Thursday. A closing statement said the
conferees agreed on "continuing the implementation of the Document of National
Accord (Taef Accord), consolidating equality and equal (Christian-Muslim)
power-sharing, preserving the country's structural foundations especially in
terms of demography and geography and approve administrative decentralization.”
The statement has also pinpointed a number of measures that need to be
implemented to improve the country’s national economy.
Chants Against Saudi Arabia as Iran Marks Jerusalem Day
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 23/17/Chants against the Saudi royal family
and the Islamic State group mingled with the traditional cries of "Death to
Israel" and "Death to America" at Jerusalem Day rallies across Iran on Friday.
The annual show of solidarity with the Palestinians, which sees hundreds of
thousands take to the streets, was launched by Iran's revolutionary leader
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and is now marked by its allies across the Middle
East. This year's commemoration comes amid an intensifying battle for influence
in the region between Shiite Iran and its Sunni arch rival Saudi Arabia who have
had no diplomatic relations since January last year."Death to the House of Saud
and Daesh (IS)," demonstrators chanted. "Death to America", "Death to Israel",
"Death to the UK". Iran has been heavily involved in the war against IS in both
Iraq and Syria, where it has trained and advised militias to fight the
jihadists. On Sunday, Iran fired six 750-kilometer (470-mile) range missiles at
an IS base in eastern Syria, days after the jihadist group claimed twin bombing
and shooting attacks in Tehran. On Friday, Iran's Revolutionary Guards displayed
some of the same Zolfaghar missiles used in the strike in Valiasr Square in the
heart of the capital, alongside a 2,000-kilometer (1,250-mile) range Qadr
missile. Iran's ballistic missile program has been the subject of persistent
concern in Washington and the target of repeated US sanctions. Parliament
speaker Ali Larijani was set to address the crowds before midday prayers.
President Hassan Rouhani also joined the march through the capital.
President Aoun lauds Chinese support to Lebanon
Daily Star/June 23/17/BEIRUT:
President Michel Aoun Friday commended Chinese support to Lebanon on regional
and international issues, and hoped for enhanced bilateral relations between the
two countries. "Lebanon is keen on boosting bilateral ties with China in all
fields," Aoun said while receiving Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, a statement
by Aoun's media office said. Aoun also said Lebanon will fulfill its role in One
Belt One Road initiative launched by Chinese President Xi Jinping. The
initiative is an economic and diplomatic program with prospects of transforming
worldwide trade, experts say. Thanking China's support to the Lebanese Army and
security forces, he also lauded Chinese contributions to "the development of the
Lebanese economy." Speaker Nabih Berri also met the visiting minister and
discussed current affairs in Lebanon and the region, in addition to means of
developing relations between the Asian giant and Lebanon. The Chinese foreign
minister later held talks with Prime Minister Saad Hariri at the Grand Serail.
The Chinese foreign minister praised Lebanon for ending its political vacuum by
electing Aoun and the swift formation of Cabinet. Both expressed mutual interest
in boosting bilateral relations between China and Lebanon, with Hariri calling
on China to play an effective role in peace and stability in the Middle East.
Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil and his Chinese counterpart hoped to boost
bilateral relations.“China has become the first exporter to Lebanon," Bassil
said in a joint press conference with the Chinese minister. “I have looked into
boosting economic collaboration with my Chinese counterpart,” Bassil added.
Bassil also sounded the alarm on the refugee crisis and called for more
international aid to Lebanon. The Lebanese government estimates that around 1.5
million Syrian refugees live in unofficial camps around the country since the
Syrian crisis started in 2011. They suffer from deteriorating economic
conditions – which Lebanon was already suffering prior to the refugee crisis.
“Reducing international aid means that Lebanon is on the verge of exploding as
regards the refugee crisis,” Bassil said. “We ask China to understand Lebanon’s
need for help amid this [refugee] crisis as Lebanon is on the verge of
explosion.” “The Syrian refugees cannot stay for long [in Lebanon],” Bassil
said. Bassil stressed Lebanon’s keenness on neutrality in regional crises,
except for the war on terror. “Lebanon is facing terrorism first-hand on its
border with its army,” Bassil said, urging dialogue among rival parties in the
crisis-ridden Middle East countries. Extremist groups maintain an armed presence
on the east Lebanon border with Syria. Hundreds of militants belonging to Daesh
(ISIS) and Jabhat Fatah al-Sham - previously known as the Nusra Front - are
holed up on Arsal’s outskirts. Lebanese troops frequently launch strikes against
the militant groups to keep them at bay.
Massive Iranian funding for Hezbollah & Other
anti-Israel terror groups revealed/
تمويل مالي كبير جداً لحزب الله وعدد من منظماتالإرهاب
Yonah Jeremy Bob/Jerusalem Post/June 23/17
Iran’s massive funding of terrorist groups that endanger Israel was exposed in
shocking detail by IDF Military Intelligence chief Maj.- Gen. Hertzi Halevi on
Wednesday.
Speaking at the IDC Herzliya Conference, Halevi revealed that Iran is funding
Hezbollah to the tune of $75 million a year, while paying $50m. of Hamas’s
budget and approximately $70m. to Islamic Jihad.
Connecting Hamas’s alliance with Iran to recent criticism of Israel for the
humanitarian situation in the Gaza strip, Halevi placed the blame for a lack of
construction supplies and the electricity problem squarely on Hamas.
Israel has let into the Strip “four times the volume of building materials”
required to build one of the world’s largest buildings, but “Hamas is using the
materials for war, not rebuilding,” he said.
Furthermore, he said that “the dispute about electricity in Gaza is an internal
Palestinian issue” between Hamas and Fatah (which controls the Palestinian
Authority). At the same time, he said Israel needed to “make Hamas choose its
priorities” regarding whether it wanted to rebuild its society, or instead use
money meant to pay for civilians’ electricity to arm itself.
Returning to the Iranian funding and support of terrorism, Halevi noted that
Tehran is regularly “acting to get exact and advanced weapons into Lebanon and
Yemen.”
Hinting at Israeli air strikes in Syria on these transfers of advanced weapons,
he said, “Israel cannot ignore this development and we have not.”
Halevi also surveyed Iran’s other activities, asking, “Why did Iran fire” a
long-range missile at ISIS in Syria at the start of the week, instead of “using
its nearby forces” already stationed in Syria.
He said the answer could be that Iran’s missile strike might not have been a
real show of strength, “and maybe was not so successful, but it was still
worrisome.”
The conference also featured a range of other top national security officials
discussing key issues.
Former Shin Bet director Yoram Cohen gave a detailed overview of the Israeli,
Palestinian and US diplomatic proposals in 2013- 2014, arguing that the gaps
between the sides were too great to overcome.
He said Israel could not count on the US’s suggested technological solutions and
multinational forces to provide Israel security and that Israel must continue to
have sole responsibility for its own security.
Former Mossad chief Shabtai Shavit looked into the future when ISIS’s remaining
strongholds fall, predicting that its ideology will continue as a threat even
after it loses its physical control over much of Iraq and Syria.
IDC Institute for Counter Terrorism Dean Boaz Ganor suggested that, even with
ISIS on the run, to properly eliminate the threat, US President Donald Trump
should “put sandals on the ground” if he did not want to “put boots on the
ground.”
Ganor meant that using special forces in conjunction with air power would make
beating ISIS faster and more complete.
Former IDF Military Intelligence chief Aharon Ze’evi-Farkash predicted that
“Shi’ite extremism will continue to be part of our problems in the Middle East”
beyond all of the ongoing short-term trends in the region.
Next, in a panel discussion on national decision-making processes on war and
peace, participants agreed that Israel’s process needs fixing, but disagreed
about how bad the situation was and what the fix should be.
Former national security adviser Yaakov Amidror said, “There are inherent
problems in Israeli government methodology. In a democracy elected politicians
make decisions, not appointed specialists. Democracy is the least problematic
[system] of all. We shouldn’t spoil it.”
He added, “We need to force ministers to at least study the data. Looking at
decision-making processes here, we are not last in the world... we sat with
British experts and they admired us. Ultimately, even with all of our problems,
cabinet decision-making is not bad.”
Former national security council adviser Uzi Arad thought the situation was far
worse.
He said that during cease-fire negotiations during the 2014 Gaza war (Operation
Protective Edge), “There were instances where the foreign minister [then Avigdor
Liberman] didn’t know about negotiations. The problem is an informative issue.”
Arad said when he was National Security Council chief, he boycotted meetings
where key ministers were kept in the dark.
In contrast, conference chairman and retired Maj.-Gen. Amos Gilead said that the
current cabinet system is broken and cannot be fixed, because there are too many
people in the security cabinet and they are too political.
He suggested experts or fewer minister should make decisions.
Lebanon: ‘Consultative Meeting’ Approves Government’s Plan
Of Action
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 23/17/Beirut – A consultative meeting chaired by Lebanese
President Michel Aoun on Thursday at the presidential palace in Baabda gathered
heads of the political parties participating in the current government and was
capable to adopt the plan of action for the cabinet’s economic and reformist
items. Most importantly, in the statement prepared earlier by Aoun and later
approved at the meeting, is the item which stressed that “Lebanon requires us to
agree on the National Charter document and maintain our pluralistic system for a
full transition to the comprehensive civil state, in what it includes of parity
(…), up to the formation of a national commission for the abolition of
sectarianism.”Participants in the meeting also stressed the need for
administrative decentralization, and announced the rejection or resettlement and
naturalization of any group, according to the statement. However, head of the
Lebanese Forces party Samir Geagea noted his reservation on the first item
related to the establishment of a national commission for the abolition of
sectarianism. “During his remarks at the meeting, Geagea said the timing for
suggesting such a commission was not suitable. There is a need to protect
Lebanon’s current unique and diverse structure and spare the country the woes of
wars that surround us,” sources from his party told the Markzia news agency. The
sources said a dispute emerged between Geagea and Minister of State for
Parliamentary Affairs, Ali Kanso when the latter suggested that Lebanon and
Syria’s government should work together on the issue of Syrian refugees and
their return home. Geagea stressed there will be “no cooperation between the two
governments.”At the economic level, the consultative meeting said that “Lebanon,
which is economically sound, needs to implement a comprehensive economic plan,
which will generate the State budget, secure economic growth, create jobs and
promote balanced development.” It also called for the revival of the Economic
and Social Council as soon as possible. Conferees also urged the government to
“implement the economic plan to invest in the offshore petroleum wealth and
complete its legal frameworks, speed up the provision of fast communications at
the lowest prices and adopt transparency as the first criterion of work in our
institutions.”
Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
June 23-24/17
ISIS Cell Captured in
Cairo, Seven Armed Men Killed in Assiut
Waleed Abdul Rahman/Asharq Al Awsat/June
23/17/Cairo- Egypt will extend a national state of emergency for three months
after the government approved President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi’s proposal to do
so. While the Egyptian authorities captured a terrorist cell that adopts the
ISIS intellect and arrested its members who possessed explosives inside an
apartment in Agouza, the Ministry of Interior announced the death of seven
terrorists involved in targeting the Coptic Christians in Assiut. Following the
blasts that targeted two churches in Tanta and Alexandria, killing 45 people and
wounding 128, the Egyptian cabinet approved Sisi’s decision to declare the state
of emergency in Egypt for three months on April 10. According to the Egyptian
constitution, declaring the state of emergency is often for a period that
doesn’t exceed three months and can’t be extended for more than three other
months, following the approval of two thirds of the parliament’s members.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Interior arrested four ISIS members, including cell
leader. Giza Security Directorate national security sector revealed that four
individuals who adopt the extremist intellect were captured, possessing
explosives, wires, sim cards and some tools used in making belts and explosive
charges. The public prosecution investigations revealed that the suspects formed
a terrorist cell and were planning to target vital, public and religious
institutions in Giza. The ministry also announced the death of seven terrorists
in desert training camps in the center of the country – in its statement, the
ministry said that this is part of its efforts related to tracking down fugitive
terrorist members who are involved in the violence that the country witnessed
during the past period.
Saudi Says Attack on Grand Mosque
Foiled as 11 Hurt in Blast Nearby
Naharnet/June 23/17/Security forces
in Saudi Arabia foiled a terror plot on Friday targeting the Grand Mosque in
Mecca, the security spokesperson of the Saudi Interior Ministry, Mansour al-Turki,
said. Security forces said the operation was planned by three terrorist groups,
two based in Mecca and the third in Jeddah. The foiled attack was targeted at
worshipers at the mosque, Saudi-owned Al-Arabiya television quoted security
forces as saying. The first operation was foiled in Mecca's Assila district,
while the second was thwarted in Ajyad al-Masafi neighborhood. A suicide bomber,
who was hiding in a house in the Ajyad neighborhood, opened fire on security
forces and refused to comply with calls to turn himself in. He later blew
himself up after being encircled, wounding six foreign residents and five
members of the security forces, the security spokesperson said. Security forces
arrested five suspects, including a woman, who are currently being interrogated.
N. Korea Accuses US of 'Smear Campaign' over Student's
Death
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 23/17/North Korea on Friday accused the
United States of waging a "smear campaign" over the death of an American student
who was detained for more than a year and sent back home in a coma. US President
Donald Trump has slammed the incarceration and eventual death of 22-year-old
Otto Warmbier as "a total disgrace". "The smear campaign against (North Korea)
staged in the US compels us to make firm determination that humanitarianism and
benevolence for the enemy are a taboo and we should further sharpen the blade of
law", the foreign ministry spokesman said in state media. The North had earlier
Friday denied torturing or mistreating Warmbier, in the first official reaction
to his death. "Our relevant agencies treat all criminals... thoroughly in
accordance with domestic laws and international standards and Warmbier was not
an exception," a spokesman for the National Reconciliation Council said. "Those
who have absolutely no idea about how well we treated Warmbier under
humanitarian conditions dare to utter 'mistreatment' and 'torture'," he said
according to the official KCNA news agency. Warmbier was buried Thursday in
Ohio, less than a week after he was sent back home in a mysterious coma. He had
been incarcerated for more than a year in North Korea after allegedly stealing a
political slogan while on a trip to the capital Pyongyang as a tourist.
Russia Warships and Sub Fire Cruise Missiles at Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 23/17/Two Russian warships and a submarine in
the Mediterranean have fired missiles at Islamic State group targets in Syria,
the defense ministry said Friday. It said that Turkish and Israeli military
"were informed in a timely manner of the missile launches through communication
channels," but it did not mention the United States. Russia suspended its
communication channel with the US about military operations in Syria from Monday
after a US jet shot down a Syrian warplane on Sunday, with Moscow accusing
Washington of failing to issue a warning. The defense ministry said in a
statement that Russia's Admiral Essen and Admiral Grigorovich warships and the
Krasnodar submarine in the eastern Mediterranean fired six Kalibr missiles at
command centers and weapons stores in Syria's Hama region. "As a result of the
surprise mass missile strike, command points were destroyed and also large
stores of weapons and ammunition of the IS terrorists in the area of Aqirbat in
the Hama province," it said. The ministry added that Russian planes then carried
out aerial strikes that "destroyed the remainder of the IS fighters and their
facilities." The most recent such strikes were announced by the ministry on May
31, aimed at targets around Palmyra. The defense ministry on Friday said that IS
this week has been moving forces into Hama province under cover of night and
using large buildings there as command points and weapons stores. It said this
was part of attempts to move out from Raqa towards Palmyra
472 Civilians Dead in Month of US-Led Syria Strikes
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 23/17/US-led coalition air strikes on two
Syrian provinces targeting jihadists have killed 472 civilians over the past
month, a monitor said Friday, more than double a previous 30-day toll. The
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the period between May 23 and June 23
saw the highest civilian death toll in coalition raids for a single month since
they began on September 23, 2014. Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman said 222
civilians, including 84 children, were killed in the largely Islamic State
group-held province of Deir Ezzor. Another 250 civilians, including 53 children,
were killed in Raqa province, where US-backed forces are trying to oust IS
jihadists from their bastion Raqa city. He told AFP that the new deaths brought
the overall civilian toll from the coalition's campaign to 1,953, including 456
children and 333 women. The previous deadliest 30-day period was between April
23 and May 23 this year that cost 225 civilian lives. The coalition insists it
takes every measure to avoid hitting civilians, including by aborting missile
strikes at the last moment if a civilian unexpectedly wanders into the target
zone. A total of more than 320,000 people have been killed since Syria's
conflict erupted in 2011 with anti-government protests, according to the
Britain-based Observatory.
Qatar Ideal First Diplomatic Crisis for Oilman Tillerson
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 23/17/The Qatar crisis presents Rex Tillerson
with his first challenge as Washington's top diplomat and an opportunity for the
former oilman to use his vast network of contacts. But while his former life as
chief of energy giant ExxonMobil prepared Tillerson well, he does have one
potential handicap -- his new boss, President Donald Trump. While Trump has
claimed credit for Saudi Arabia's air and land blockade of its gas-rich
neighbor, Tillerson has urged an end to the embargo and restored alliances. That
differing approach could make the secretary of state's task difficult at best,
but his friends in Washington say his regional experience makes him just the man
for the job. "If anyone can do it, it's him," says James Jeffrey of the
Washington Institute of Near East Policy, a former senior diplomat who advised
Tillerson at Exxon.On the face of it, the diplomatic standoff in the oil and
gas-rich Gulf has all the makings of a US foreign policy disaster coming at the
worst possible time. Late last month, Trump made what appeared at the time a
triumphal visit to Riyadh to unite U.S. friends in the region against Iranian
meddling and Islamist extremism. But just weeks later, on June 5, Saudi Arabia,
Bahrain, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates broke ties with Qatar, accusing its
royal government of backing terrorist groups. The resulting stand-off left the
countries that host the bulk of U.S. forces in the region -- Turkey, Qatar,
Kuwait and Iraq -- at odds with Washington's other key allies.
Fighter jets
And it could only strengthen the hand of Iran, which is confronting U.S. and
Saudi interests through covert operations and proxies in Syria, Yemen, Iraq and
Lebanon. Trump initially appeared to revel in the situation, praising Riyadh for
standing up to fight terror financing and accusing Qatar of supporting extremism
at a "high level." But Tillerson -- who has been asked by the White House to
help defuse the situation -- took a different tack, and this week appeared to be
making some progress. On Tuesday, after the secretary of state had cancelled a
planned visit to Mexico and spent two frustrating days on the telephone, he
issued a strong statement. His target was not Qatar -- although he has been
clear that all countries should do more to eradicate terror funding -- but
Riyadh and its Emirati ally. Tillerson's spokeswoman, Heather Nauert, told
reporters that Washington was "mystified" that the Saudis and Emiratis had not
released details of their allegations against Qatar. "The more that time goes
by, the more doubt is raised about the actions taken by Saudi Arabia and the UAE,"
she said, before turning the knife. Were Riyadh's actions really about "Qatar's
alleged support for terrorism, or were they about the long simmering grievances
between and among the GCC countries?" she asked. The statement was a clear
signal that, despite Trump's rhetoric, official Washington blames the Saudis for
escalating an unnecessary dispute. It was not the first such signal from Trump's
top national security team -- whose actions often struggle to speak louder than
the president's words.
Terror funds
A week earlier, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis signed a $12 billion deal to
sell Qatar -- supposedly a terror sponsor -- .U.S.-made F-15 fighter jets. In
case that wasn't a strong enough sign, Tillerson also made what for him was a
rare appearance before reporters to urge the Saudis to "ease" their embargo.
Will Saudi Arabia and the Emirates listen to the State Department and the
Pentagon, and seek a face-saving agreement with Qatar that reunites the allies?
Or will they listen to Trump, who during a Wednesday campaign speech praised the
Saudi king "for fighting with other countries that have been funding terrorism"?
The key to re-balancing the relationship will lie with Tillerson. "I think he's
doing a good job, and he knows everybody. He knows the Saudis and the Qataris
very well," said Jeffrey, a White House advisor under former president George W.
Bush. For Jeffrey, the mistake was to let Riyadh think Trump had given them a
green light. "It isn't that you have two separate policies. Trump is supporting
Mattis and Tillerson," Jeffrey argues. "It's just that Trump can't help himself
-- he communicates in a different sphere through tweets and with his supporters.
"It's not Trump the commander-in-chief or the president, it's Trump the leader
of a movement with its own worldview," he said. "It's going to take a while for
the Saudis and the Emiratis to understand this and not to take it to the bank,
which is what they did." On Wednesday, a day after the strong "mystified"
statement, Tillerson announced that Riyadh had now indeed drawn up a list of
demands.
Turkey Sends First Cargo Ship with Aid for Qatar
Turkey on Thursday sent a first ship loaded with aid for its embattled regional
ally Qatar, which has been hit by sanctions from Gulf powers led by Saudi
Arabia, state media said.
Almost two dozen Turkish troops also arrived in Qatar as Ankara ramps up
military support for Doha, even as it tries not to irritate Riyadh. Turkey has
already sent over 100 planes with food and other aid for Qatar, but this is the
first time a cargo ship has embarked on the voyage to Doha. The ship left the
Aegean port of Aliaga in Izmir province with around 4,000 tonnes of fruit,
vegetables and other foodstuffs on board, the Anadolu news agency said. It
should arrive in 10 days. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain
broke off relations with Qatar on June 5, accusing it of supporting "terrorism"
and leaving Doha economically and politically isolated. But Turkish President
Recep Tayyip Erdogan immediately vowed to support Qatar and vehemently rejected
the accusations -- already strongly denied by Doha -- that Qatar supports
terrorism. Economy Minister Nihat Zeybekci said Wednesday that Turkey had
already sent 105 cargo flights to Qatar loaded with aid to help the country
through the crisis. A bill was also fast-tracked through the Turkish parliament
this month allowing Ankara to send up to several thousand troops to a base in
Qatar. A contingent of 23 soldiers and five armored vehicles arrived in Qatar on
Thursday, the Turkish army said in a statement. The Hurriyet daily said that
there were now 113 Turkish soldiers in Qatar, while adding that the armored
vehicles did not include tanks. The crisis has put Turkey in a delicate position
as Ankara regards Qatar as its chief ally in the Gulf, but is also keen to
maintain its improving relations with the key regional power Saudi Arabia.
Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu made a tour of Gulf capitals last week,
including Riyadh and Doha, in the hope of finding a solution but his visit
appeared not to bear any fruit. Ankara has stopped short of directly criticizing
Saudi Arabia's actions, merely calling on Riyadh to take a lead role in solving
the crisis. In a sign of the importance of the relations with Riyadh, Erdogan
held phone talks late Wednesday with Saudi King Salman after the sudden
appointment of his son Mohammed bin Salman as crown prince in place of Mohammed
bin Nayef. Erdogan also spoke with Mohammed bin Salman himself and offered his
congratulations over the move, Anadolu said. Both sides expressed a commitment
to further strengthening relations between Ankara and Riyadh and to "step up
efforts" to end the tensions concerning Qatar, it added. Relations between Saudi
Arabia and Turkey had been damaged by Riyadh's role in the 2013 ousting of
Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi, a close ally of Ankara. But ties thawed
considerably after the accession of Salman to the throne in 2015, with the king
warmly welcomed on visits to Turkey.
Suicide Bomber Kills 9 in Western Iraq
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 23/17/A suicide bomber blew himself up in a
town in western Iraq on Friday, killing at least eight civilians and a soldier,
officers said. He was one of a group of four suicide bombers who infiltrated a
neighbourhood of Al-Baghdadi, a town on the Euphrates River in the restive
western province of Anbar. "Army forces were able to kill three suicide bombers
after trapping them in a house in the Martyrs neighbourhood by detonating their
belts with gunfire," a senior police officer said. "The fourth managed to hide
and later blow himself up in the midst of a group of civilians and soldiers,"
the officer said. The police officer and Sharhabil al-Obeidi, a local district
official, said eight civilians and a soldier were killed in the blast, while
another 11 people were wounded. Anbar is a sprawling desert province traversed
by the Euphrates River and bordering Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. It has long
been an insurgent stronghold, and IS already controlled parts of it before it
swept through Iraq in 2014 to take over around a third of the country.
Pro-government forces have since retaken most towns and cities in Anbar, but the
jihadists still control areas near the Syrian border and have desert hideouts
from which they harass federal forces.
Local Qaida Leader in Yemen Killed by US Air Strike
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 23/17/A US air strike has killed a regional
al-Qaida leader and two associates in Yemen's Shabwa province, a jihadist
stronghold in the south, the Pentagon said Thursday. Abu Khattab al-Awlaqi was
emir for al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula in Shabwa, responsible for planning
and conducting attacks against civilians, the US military's Central Command said
in a statement. Washington considers al-Qaida's Yemen-based branch to be its
most dangerous and has conducted a long-running drone war against its leaders.
The aim of the June 16 strike was to "disrupt terrorist compounds, and attack
networks in Yemen," the statement read. The day after the strike, a Yemeni
security official said it was conducted by drone, and had hit a vehicle in Saeed
district, killing the driver and both passengers. President Donald Trump has
given commanders greater leeway to conduct raids and strikes in Yemen, and the
war-torn country has seen a quickening tempo of operations against al-Qaida. For
more than two years, Yemen has been locked in a devastating civil war between
the Saudi-backed government and Shiite rebels who control the capital. Al-Qaeda
has taken advantage of the conflict to expand its presence in several areas of
southern and eastern Yemen under the nominal control of the government and its
allies in a Saudi-led military coalition.
Iran Nuclear Chief Urges West to Save Historic Deal
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 23/17/Iran's nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi
is urging the West to change course in the Middle East in order to save the
historic atomic deal, saying "the moment of truth has arrived."The accord,
reached between Tehran and world powers in Vienna in July 2015, saw Iran
drastically curb its nuclear activities. In return, nuclear-related Western and
U.N. sanctions were lifted. But writing in Friday's Guardian newspaper, Salehi,
head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, said negotiating agreements with
Western powers had been a "mixed experience" for Tehran. "Often, following some
hard-won engagement, some Western nations, whether distracted by shortsighted
political motivations or the lucrative inducements of other regional actors,
walk away and allow the whole situation to return to the status quo ante," he
said. Salehi was writing against the background of increasing U.S.-Iran tensions
since President Donald Trump came to power. He said the nuclear deal could be
saved but it would take concerted action and a clarification of Western security
policy in the Middle East. "For example, U.S. arms sales to some traditional
regional clients in the Middle East, and ostentatious, lavish arms purchases by
the same regional actors just because of the abundance of oil wealth, are
provocative," he said. "This is especially the case if the national defense
efforts of Iran -- which are partly induced by this process -- are
simultaneously opposed and undermined. It would be unrealistic to expect Iran to
remain indifferent to the destabilizing impact of such conduct." Trump has vowed
to "dismantle" the "disastrous" nuclear deal and has ratcheted up U.S.
sanctions, calling for Iran to be isolated and throwing his weight behind
Tehran's arch rival Saudi Arabia. Last month, on his first foreign trip, Trump
visited Saudi Arabia and promised its leaders access to $110 billion in weapons
and training. Salehi called for engagement from all parties. "We have, so far,
taken a number of solid steps towards a constructive engagement aiming at common
goals and objectives. Those steps could be strengthened further by genuine
reciprocal gestures and actions. "The moment of truth has arrived."
Merkel Invites European Leaders to G20 Warm-Up Meeting
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 23/17/German Chancellor Angela Merkel will
next Thursday host European leaders taking part in July's G20 summit, where
tensions with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration are expected to come
to the fore. Merkel's deputy spokeswoman Ulrike Demmer told reporters Friday
that the Berlin meeting would bring together British Prime Minister Theresa May
and French President Emmanuel Macron as well as the leaders of Italy, Spain, the
Netherlands and Norway. European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker and EU
president Donald Tusk will also attend. "The chancellor wishes to personally
inform her European partners on how the summit will be organized and discuss the
main points with them," Demmer said. The same day as the gathering, Merkel will
speak to parliament to set out her goals for the G20 summit in the northern port
city of Hamburg on July 7-8. Diplomats briefed on the Berlin meeting said it
would cover points of friction likely to arise with Trump including
transatlantic differences on trade and climate protection -- already sources of
tension at last month's G7 summit in Italy. Merkel's government also hopes to
bolster European unity in the face of potential conflicts with Russia and
Turkey, sources said.
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on
June 23-24/17
List of demands on Qatar by Saudi Arabia, other Arab nationsمطالب
الدول الخليجية ومصر من دولة قطر
Associated Press/June 23/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=56505
Acting as a mediator, Kuwait has presented Qatar a long-awaited list of demands
from Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt, four Arab
nations that cut ties with Qatar in early June. A copy of the list was obtained
by The Associated Press and translated from Arabic.
A look at the demands:
— Curb diplomatic ties with Iran and close its diplomatic missions there. Expel
members of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard from Qatar and cut off any joint military
cooperation with Iran. Only trade and commerce with Iran that complies with U.S.
and international sanctions will be permitted.
— Sever all ties to “terrorist organizations,” specifically the Muslim
Brotherhood, the Islamic State group, al-Qaida, and Lebanon’s Hezbollah.
Formally declare those entities as terrorist groups.
— Shut down Al-Jazeera and its affiliate stations.
— Shut down news outlets that Qatar funds, directly and indirectly, including
Arabi21, Rassd, Al Araby Al-Jadeed and Middle East Eye.
— Immediately terminate the Turkish military presence currently in Qatar and end
any joint military cooperation with Turkey inside of Qatar.
— Stop all means of funding for individuals, groups or organizations that have
been designated as terrorists by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, Bahrain, the
United States and other countries.
— Hand over “terrorist figures” and wanted individuals from Saudi Arabia, the
UAE, Egypt and Bahrain to their countries of origin. Freeze their assets, and
provide any desired information about their residency, movements and finances.
— End interference in sovereign countries’ internal affairs. Stop granting
citizenship to wanted nationals from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt and Bahrain.
Revoke Qatari citizenship for existing nationals where such citizenship violates
those countries’ laws.
— Stop all contacts with the political opposition in Saudi Arabia, the UAE,
Egypt and Bahrain. Hand over all files detailing Qatar’s prior contacts with and
support for those opposition groups.
— Pay reparations and compensation for loss of life and other, financial losses
caused by Qatar’s policies in recent years. The sum will be determined in
coordination with Qatar.
— Align itself with the other Gulf and Arab countries militarily, politically,
socially and economically, as well as on economic matters, in line with an
agreement reached with Saudi Arabia in 2014.
— Agree to all the demands within 10 days of it being submitted to Qatar, or the
list becomes invalid. The document doesn’t specify what the countries will do if
Qatar refuses to comply.
— Consent to monthly audits for the first year after agreeing to the demands,
then once per quarter during the second year. For the following 10 years, Qatar
would be monitored annually for compliance.
Gulf crisis: UAE accuses Qatar of 'leaking' list of 13
demands
Middle East Eye/June 23/17
Foreign minister says Qatar must take its list of demands seriously or the
diplomatic crisis will turn into a 'divorce'
The UAE's foreign minister on Friday accused Qatar of "leaking" a list of 13
demands it says must be met for the Emirates and its allies to end a blockade on
Doha.
Anwar Gargash, the United Arab Emirates state minister for foreign affairs, said
Qatar had to take seriously its list of demands or the diplomatic emergency
would turn into a "divorce".
But Gargash, who has in recent days claimed Al Jazeera was a "mouthpiece" for
extremists, accused Qatar of leaking the document presented by Saudi Arabia, the
UAE, Bahrain and Egypt.
The demands have not been officially unveiled but Doha-based Al Jazeera news
channel said overnight on Thursday they were handed to Qatar by Kuwait, which is
mediating in the crisis.
According to the document posted on social media, the Saudi-led coalition
demands that Qatar closes down Al-Jazeera, downgrades diplomatic ties with Iran
and shuts a Turkish military base in the emirate.
"The leak (of the demands by Qatar) is an attempt to abort the mediation in a
childish act that we have grown accustomed to from our brother," Gargash wrote
on Twitter.
"It would be wiser that (Qatar) deal seriously with the demands and concerns of
the neighbours or a divorce will take place," he said.
On 5 June, Saudi Arabia and the UAE led a severing of all links with Qatar for
allegedly supporting groups, including some backed by Iran, "that aim to
destabilise the region".
Egypt, Bahrain and other allies followed.
Saudi Arabia regularly accuses Iran, its regional rival, of interference
throughout the Middle East.
As well as cutting diplomatic ties, Qatar's neighbours closed their air space to
Qatari carriers and blocked the small but gas-rich emirate's only land border,
vital for its food imports.
"The brother (Qatar) must realise that the solution for its crisis lies not in
Tehran or Beirut or Ankara or Western capitals or in media outlets, but in
regaining the trust of its neighbours," Gargash said.
"It is not possible to accept that the brother continues as the Trojan horse" in
the Gulf or as a funder and "platform for an extremist agenda," he added.
Turkey has already rejected the demands. "Strengthening the Turkish base would
be a positive step in terms of the Gulf's security," said Turkey's defence
minister, Fikri Isik. "Re-evaluating the base agreement with Qatar is not on our
agenda."
According to the demands, Qatar must sever ties with "terrorist", ideological
and sectarian organisations including the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and the
Islamic State.
The list also commands Qatar to stop funding publications including Middle East
Eye. Middle East Eye denied that it was funded by Qatar or any other state or
group. David Hearst, its editor said in a statement:
"Middle East Eye is independent of any government or movement and is not funded
by Qatar," he said.
"Maybe the fate of Al Jazeera will depend on talks between the government of
Qatar and its neighbours. But Middle East Eye is here to stay."
Qatari officials have yet to reply to the demands. But on Monday, Foreign
Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani said that Qatar would not
negotiate with the four states until they lifted their blockade against Doha.
The countries give Doha 10 days to comply, failing which the list becomes
"void", an official told Reuters without elaborating.
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/uae-tells-qatar-take-demands-seriously-or-face-divorce-1858444206
Iran is flexing its muscles/ايران تستعرض
قوتها
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/ArabNews/June 23/ 2017
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=56509
http://www.arabnews.com/node/1119241
Iran’s military adventurism and destabilizing behavior have reached an
unprecedented level that could turn regional tensions into a conflagration.
Tehran’s stepped-up interference in Yemen is a direct threat to the Bab Al-Mandab
strait and the security of neighboring countries. US officials say Iran is now
providing cruise missiles to Yemen’s Houthis.
In Iraq, Tehran is obstructing efforts by state and non-state actors to bridge
Sunni-Shiite gaps. It seeks to control Iraq, and has started a widespread
campaign to influence decision-making and secure a victory for Shiite groups in
parliamentary elections.
“Iran has been interfering even in the decision of the Iraqi people,” said Iraqi
Vice President Iyad Allawi. “We don’t want an election based on sectarianism. We
want an inclusive political process... We hope that the Iraqis would choose
themselves without any involvement by any foreign power.”
In other Arab nations, Iran is trying to increase its influence by inciting
instability and conflict. For example, the Saudi navy recently captured a boat
with three members of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) near the Kingdom’s
offshore Marjan oilfield.
“This was one of three vessels which were intercepted by Saudi forces. It was
captured with the three men on board, the other two escaped,” said the Saudi
Information Ministry. The captured IRGC members “are now being questioned by
Saudi authorities.”
Regarding Syria, in an unprecedented move, Iran fired its first ballistic
missile abroad in nearly two decades. This violates Syrian sovereignty and UN
Resolution 2231, which “calls upon Iran not to undertake any activity related to
ballistic missiles.” Despite Tehran violating the resolution 11 times, the UN
Security Council has not punished it.
The US and the international community should hold Iranian leaders accountable.
This can be accomplished by a combination of political pressure, economic
sanctions and force.
Iran’s missile attack on Syria is a highly significant and perilous development,
as it has repeatedly boasted that its ballistic missiles can reach any country
in the region. They are also capable of carrying nuclear warheads; it is
believed that this is Iran’s intention.
It has been so emboldened that it is openly boasting about the missile attack,
and Iranian generals have admitted on state television that it was a warning to
enemies. “The Saudis and Americans are especially receivers of this message,”
said Gen. Ramazan Sharif of the IRGC.
Iran is beginning a new stage in its interventions in Arab countries via its
ballistic missile capabilities. This will intensify sectarianism, radicalization
and militarization of regional conflicts. If this is met with silence, Tehran
will be further empowered and emboldened because it interprets silence as
weakness.
The US and the international community should hold Iranian leaders accountable.
This can be accomplished by a combination of political pressure, economic
sanctions and force. The US should seek assistance from European allies and a
united front with several Middle Eastern powers; this would be a powerful
bulwark against Tehran. Sanctions from Muslim countries would be a significant
blow to Tehran’s self-portrayal as a leader of the Muslim world.
• Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated, Iranian-American political
scientist. He is a leading expert on Iran and US foreign policy, a businessman
and president of the International American Council. He serves on the boards of
the Harvard International Review, the Harvard International Relations Council
and the US-Middle East Chamber for Commerce and Business. He can be reached on
Twitter @Dr_Rafizadeh.
The rise of Mohammed bin Salman: Alarm bells should be
ringing
Jamal Elshayyal/MEE/June 23/17
Several months ago, I attended a gathering of influential figures being hosted
by a senior personality in the intelligence community of one of the Gulf
countries. It was past midnight, and the discussion had gone on for some time,
the topic being the political developments in the region, specifically unfolding
events in Saudi Arabia.
MBS’s obsession with becoming king, coupled with the UAE’s relentless
interference in the internal politics of other countries, could very well throw
the Gulf into turmoil
There were stories coming from Riyadh about a shift in fault lines, Crown Prince
Mohammed bin Nayef’s wings were being clipped and his powers reduced, while his
deputy Mohammed bin Salman was becoming more and more influential by the day.
Meanwhile, the kingdom’s foreign minister, Adel al-Jubeir, had been in
Washington for over two weeks without making any public appearances, and no one
knew for certain what exactly it was he was doing there.
Among those present was the former prime minister of a non-Arab country. Our
host asked him his views about the rumblings coming out of Riyadh, and what he
thought al-Jubeir was doing in the US.
The former statesman’s answer had many in the room shocked, even doubtful.
But so far everything he said has turned out to be true.
A former PM's predictions
He spoke of a young prince hell-bent on becoming king, and outlined some of the
conditions that would make the plot succeed. A scheme that was hatched by the
rulers of the United Arab Emirates who were desperate to regain their foothold
in the Saudi Royal Court after they had so swiftly lost it following the death
of King Abdullah in 2014.
'This guy is willing to betray his own father for the crown,' responded the
former prime minister
A key element to the plot was gaining the blessings of US intelligence and
security institutions, but to do that, the Emiratis and their ambitious young
ally would have to convince the Americans to ditch Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Nayef, a man nicknamed as “Washington’s favourite Saudi”.
“For the Americans to abandon Mohammed bin Nayef and choose this young prince,
he has to offer them something no one has managed or even dared to offer
before,” said the former prime minister.
Not being the cryptic type, he then proceeded to spell it out: “He has to
recognise Israel. If he does that then the Americans will support him, they’ll
even crown him themselves."
“There’s no way he’d be willing to do that, plus Saudi society wouldn’t accept
it, they’d view it as betrayal,” I said.
“This guy is willing to betray his own father for the crown,” responded the
former prime minister.
The Qatari connection
Fast-forward to today and you now have reports of economic ties between Riyadh
and Tel Aviv and tweets by senior Israeli officials praising their Arab friends
are being posted almost on a daily basis.
Meanwhile, Saudi and the UAE, who have been blockading Qatar for more than two
weeks now, have attempted to justify their siege by accusing Doha of supporting
Palestinian resistance group Hamas.
More significantly though was the news that broke early on Wednesday morning – a
royal decree, relieving Mohammed bin Nayef of his duties as crown prince, and
naming the ambitious young prince, Mohammed bin Salman – or MBS as he’s fast
becoming known – as heir to the Saudi throne.
Last week, I wrote an article explaining that a large part of the GCC crisis is
to do with the struggle for the Saudi throne. My assessment and the predictions
made by the former prime minister at that gathering late last year appear to be
accurate.
More importantly, they should be cause for alarm because it seems that MBS’s
obsession with becoming king, coupled with the UAE’s relentless interference in
the internal politics of other countries, could very well throw the Gulf into
turmoil.
Ring the alarm bells
Political change in Saudi Arabia has always been gradual. It's one of the
reasons why the kingdom has remained stable and, in turn, a source of steadiness
in the region.
This aggressive push to force change could very well upset the balance of power
in the kingdom, which is why alarm bells should be ringing loud and clear in
Washington and London.
MBS has already demonstrated his erratic nature through his ill-conceived war in
Yemen, which has killed thousands of people, not to mention the hundreds of
millions of dollars the conflict has cost the Saudi economy.
The sheikhs of Abu Dhabi and Dubai have also made it clear that they value their
own personal interests above freedom, peace and stability in the Middle East.
From the coup in Egypt to the ongoing civil war in Libya, Emirati foreign policy
has done little more than sow discord and conflict in the region; and if it
continues to go unchecked, the consequences could be a great deal worse.
MBS is now next in line to the throne. The US and Britain, Saudi’s closest
allies, would do well to try and curb the prince’s enthusiasm before he becomes
king, otherwise they could be faced with a monarch who wages war on a whim and
understands little in the way of international diplomacy.
The question is, will there be enough time to reason with MBS and rescue the
Gulf region from potential chaos? Or will we be hearing news of “the sudden
passing” of King Salman in the coming weeks?
**Jamal Elshayyal is an international award-winning senior correspondent for Al
Jazeera English. He joined the channel in 2006 as part of its launch team and
served as its first Middle East editor. He covered the 2011 uprisings in Egypt,
Libya, Syria and Yemen. He has interviewed several world leaders and has
extensive access to major power players in the GCC and the MENA region.
Turkey Seizes Assyrian Monastery Property/ تركيا تصادر دير
مار جبرايل الأشوري التاريخي
By Ygar Gltekin/Assyrian International News Agency/June 23/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=56501
http://www.aina.org/news/20170623130101.htm
http://www.agos.com.tr
The St. Gabriel Assyrian Monastery, in Mardin Turkey, was founded in 397
A.D.After Mardin became a Metropolitan Municipality, its villages were
officially turned into neighbourhoods as per the law and attached to the
provincial administration. Following the legislative amendment introduced in
late 2012, the Governorate of Mardin established a liquidation committee. The
Liquidation Committee started to redistribute in the city, the property of
institutions whose legal entity had expired. The transfer and liquidation
procedures are still ongoing.
In 2016, the Transfer, Liquidation and Redistribution Committee of Mardin
Governorate transferred to primarily the Treasury as well as other relevant
public institutions numerous churches, monasteries, cemeteries and other assets
of the Syriac community in the districts of Mardin. The Mor Gabriel Monastery
Foundation appealed to the decision yet the liquidation committee rejected their
appeal last May. The churches, monasteries and cemeteries whose ownerships were
given to the Treasury were then transferred to the Diyanet.
Inquiries of the Mor Gabriel Monastery Foundation revealed that dozens of
churches and monasteries had been transferred to the Treasury first and then
allocated to the Diyanet. And the cemeteries have been transferred to the
Metropolitan Municipality of Mardin. The maintenance of some of the churches and
monasteries are currently being provided by the Mor Gabriel Monastery Foundation
and they are opened to worship on certain days. Similarly, the cemeteries are
still actively used by the Syriac community who visits them and performs burial
procedures. The Syriacs have appealed to the Court for the cancellation of the
decision.
Cancellation cases
"We started to file lawsuits and in the meantime our enquiries continued" said
Kuryakos Erg�n, the Chairman of Mor Gabriel Monastery Foundation. Erg�n said
they would appeal to the court for the cancellation of nearly 30 title deed
registries.
Speaking to Agos, Erg�n made the following remarks:
"For years, minority foundations could not acquire property in Turkey. Then
legislative amendments were introduced in 2002 upon which we engaged in a number
of initiatives. We were able to have some of the title deeds registered in the
name of our foundation. And for others, the legal process was ongoing. It was
not possible for us to follow-up all the title deeds. In the meantime cadastral
works were carried out as well. At the cadastral offices, they did not show any
sensitivity about the legislative amendment enabling the acquisition of property
by minority foundations. In the face of the situation, we are filing lawsuits to
the extent possible. In places where we couldn't follow up the situation, some
monasteries and other property were given to the legal entity of the Village.
"After Mardin became a Metropolitan municipality the governorate established a
liquidation committee. The liquidation procedures began and many places were
redistributed. We were expecting them to be transferred to the municipality
however they transferred the assets to the Treasury instead. The Metropolitan
Municipality of Mardin took the decision to Court. However we assume that the
cases were dropped after a trustee was appointed.
We have also filed appeals to the Commission numerous times and taken witnesses
however they told us that legally it was not possible to give it to us and that
it's transfer procedures to the Treasury had been completed. On the other hand
the Treasury gave the church monastery and the cemetery to the use of Diyanet.
Here we are talking about around 50 churches and monasteries. We are still
working on identifying the properties transferred. We will file an application
to the directorate General of Foundations and will also file a court case. So
far we have filed court cases for around 20 title deeds and we will do the same
for around 30 more."
Problem of registration
Foundation of Mor Gabriel Monastery, filed a court case at the Civil Court of
First Instance in Mardin against the registration of title deed records in the
name of Treasury. In the petition filed to the court it has been noted that the
properties subject to the court case had been, since ancient times, under the
possession and ownership of the Foundation and the significance of Mor Gabriel
Monastery has been underlined; "Its history dates back to the 4th century BC.
The Monastery is one of the oldest monasteries in the world which is still
active and is one of the most ancient religious centers of Syriacs and the
entire world with its history of more than 1600 years. Midyat Syriac Deyrulumur
Mor Gabriel Monastery Foundation had been established on the basis of the
imperial order of Sultan Abd�lmecid Han during the Ottoman Empire in "1267
Islamic calendar (1851/1852 Gregorian calendar) and its status was redefined,
became a legal entity, on the basis of the Foundations Law of 13.06.1935 with no
2762 . The Foundation had been recognised as "a religious community foundation"
on the basis of a Regulation issued in 2002 by the Directorate General of
Foundation and was included in the List of Religious Community Foundations
drafted same year. Foundations that I'm not included in this list are in not
recognised as religious community foundations."
It has been underlined in the petition that the properties which have been
registered in the name of the Treasury, have so far been protected and
maintained by the Foundation.
Violation of Lausanne
The petition has made a reference to the Lausanne Treaty underlining that the
registration in the name of the Treasury has constituted a violation of the
Treaty;
"According to Article 42/3 of the Lausanne Treaty the Turkish Government
undertakes to grant full protection to the churches, synagogues, cemeteries, and
other religious establishments of the above-mentioned minorities (non-Muslims).
All facilities and authorisation will be granted to the pious foundations, and
to the religious and charitable institutions of the said minorities at present
existing in Turkey, and the Turkish Government will not refuse, for the
formation of new religious and charitable institutions, any of the necessary
facilities which are granted to other private institutions of that nature. By
the same token according to Article 37 of the Lausanne Treaty, Turkey undertakes
that the stipulation's contained in Article 38 to 44 shall be recognised as
fundamental laws, and that no law, no regulation, nor official action shall
conflict or interfere with these stipulation's, nor shall any law, regulation,
nor official action prevail over them. Evidently this erroneous ownership status
is in explicit violation of the Lausanne Treaty which is the founding Treaty of
the Republic of Turkey."
The petition has also made reference to the precedents of the Civil Chamber of
the Court of Cassation as well as the European Court of Human Rights and its
additional protocols.
© 2017, Assyrian International News Agency. All Rights Reserved.
Kurdish Referendum: What Mullah Mustafa Might Do
Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/June 23/17/
What would a list of the problems that need urgent attention in Iraq today look
like?
No matter how you look at it the campaign to liberate Mosul and wipe out ISIS,
regarded by many as an enemy of humanity, would top the list. Next to it might
be the formation of a new national government cutting across sectarian barriers
and offering Iraqis a hope for the future. The list could also include the need
to stop corruption from developing into a way of life rather than an affliction
in certain segments of the government. Equally important is to achieve national
consensus to gradually rid the country of nefarious foreign intervention.
Against such a background the decision by the Kurdish leadership in the
autonomous region to hold an “independence referendum”, announced for 25
September, might sound out of place. One could ask which of the urgent problems
such an exercise might address, let alone solve? Isn’t the proposed referendum a
solution to a non-existent problem or, worse still, a ploy to create a new
problem? For at least 100 years, the idea of an independent state has been in
the filigrane of aspiration for Kurdish elites not only in Iraq but also in
Turkey, Syria and Iran that are home to substantial Kurdish communities.
The Kurds have as much right to self-determination as any other segment of
humanity. However, the question of timing, or if you like sequencing, cannot be
ignored. The concept of sequencing (awlawiya in Arabic) was an important element
in the thinking of some of the most important recent Kurdish leaders. For Qazi
Muhammad, who set up the short-lived Mahabad republic in Iranian Kurdistan in
1946, the sequences went this way:
1-Autonomy for the Iranian Kurds within the Iranian state.
2-The use of Kurdish as the medium of education and administration.
3-The election of a provincial council to supervise state and social matters.
The late Mullah Mustafa Barzani, arguably the most significant Kurdish political
leader of the last 100 years, had his own sequencing. In conversations in the
1970s, when he was fighting against Ba’athist repression, he dwelt on his triple
principle of: justice, freedom and independence.
His first priority was justice for Iraqi Kurds who, though accounting for 20
percent of the population, did not have a commensurate share in the government
and the enjoyment of Iraq’s wealth. His hope was that justice would be followed
by freedom for the whole of Iraq and that, in turn, would set the stage for
Kurdish independence. Saddam propaganda tried to portray Barzani as a
secessionist backed by Iraq’s foreign enemies, including Iran. However,
Barzani’s sequencing convinced other Iraqi opposition groups that the Kurdish
leader was sincerely committed to justice and freedom for all Iraqis, Arab or
Kurd, before the issue of independence could be raised in the context of based
political system based on the rule of law.
Barzani’s strategy was a source of inspiration for some other Kurdish leaders,
among them Abdul-Rahman Qassemlou who brought the Kurdistan Democratic Party of
Iran out of decades of death-like trorpor and turned it into a major player in
post-revolution politics, albeit briefly.
In several conversations, Qassemlou, who was subsequently assassinated in Vienna
by the Islamic Republic’s agents, put “democracy for Iran” as the first
objective in his version of sequencing.
That would be followed by “autonomy for Kurdistan” and, because Qassemlou was a
Social Democrat, ultimately, a “progressive” system of government. Qazi
Muhammad, Barzani and Qassemlou did not fall into the populist trap because they
were genuine products of a Kurdish culture in which courage and prudence were
Siamese twins. They steered clear of cheap slogans of the kind that became
fashionable among some other Kurdish leaders who turned independence, a great
ideal, into a petty partisan power ploy.
In a different register, even Abdullah Ocalan, the “father” of the Kurdistan
Workers’ Party (PKK), had his own version of sequencing in which the overthrow
of the “Turkish capitalist state” was ahead of Kurdish independence in a list of
objectives. Exercising the right of self-determination is different from
pursuing a secessionist strategy. There is not a single example of secessionism
having led to independence for any ethnic group. This was tried in many parts of
Africa, most notably in Katanga, Kivu and Biafra, not to mention the Unilateral
Declaration of Independence (UDI) by the White minority leaders in Rhodesia, and
failed. Elsewhere, for example in South Sudan, it triggered decades of war and
ultimately gave birth to a failed state drowned in blood.
Divorce is always difficult and painful, even at the level of ordinary couples,
let alone nations. This is why it has to be handled with extra care and, as far
as possible, in a calm atmosphere and a spirit of benevolence. We have only two
examples of relatively amicable divorce at the level of nations.
The first was the splitting of Czechoslovakia into two states: the Czech
Republic and Slovakia. It worked without violence because it followed the
sequencing as imagined by Mullah Mustafa: first came justice, then freedom and
ultimately independence. The second example is East Timor which won
independence, after suffering genocide, when Indonesia, which had annexed it,
liberated itself from the Suharto dictatorship. Freedom for Indonesia preceded
independence for East Timor.
Independence is too important an issue to be decided with a yes-or-no
referendum.
Those who organize ‘win it’ face questions regarding the voter turnout and the
margin of majority. If you win with the 99.99 percent margin current in the
“Third Word” few people will take the results seriously. If you win with a
West-European style 51-49 per cent, you have merely divided your people.
Independence for Iraqi Kurdistan involves many complex issues. There are more
Kurds in Iraq outside the autonomous region than inside it. What will be their
status? How will Iraq’s national debt and assets be divided between Baghdad and
a putative state in the Kurdish provinces? What might be the attitude of
neighbors towards the emergence of an independent landlocked mini-state?
This is not meant as a project fear. The decision has been taken and canceling
the referendum now would mean loss of face by Kurdish leaders. But it is still
possible to walk the cat back at least half the way. Let’s imagine what Mullah
Mustafa might have done in such a situation?
I can imagine him wearing his fatherly smile while carving a pipe out of a piece
of wood (he was an artist with his hands) and pondering the question. I think he
would have advised greater attention to the question in the referendum. For
example, the question could be: Will you authorize the autonomous government to
open talks with the Iraqi government about independence? If the answer is yes,
independence for Kurds will become an all-Iraqi project that could unite Iraqis
in building a new future even as two separate states. But, am I dreaming too
much?
The domestic base of terror in Tehran
Brenda Shaffer/Al Arabiya/June 23/17
Since the June 7 terrorist attacks in Tehran, the Iranian government has made
dozens of arrests and highlighted the fact that ISIS claimed responsibility. The
country’s leaders have driven the narrative that Iran is yet another victim of
this global terrorist network – even going so far as to launch missiles
targeting ISIS operations in Syria. But it is increasingly apparent that, while
outside terrorists may have played a role, the government’s focus on their
involvement hides a more complex truth, with significant implications for US
policy.
Through recent news reports we’ve learned that those rounded-up as part of the
attacks are all members of the Kurdish and Baluch ethnic minorities. The
conflict with Iran’s Kurdish and Baluch minorities is not new: Tehran has been
battling for close to a decade a much larger insurgency with both groups,
without any evidence of direct links to ISIS. Most recently, on the eve of the
Tehran attacks, a Kurdish nationalist group – with no global terrorist
connections – killed two Iranian border guards near the city of Urmiya.
Despite this, the US and other western countries appear to be taking Iran at its
word that the attacks in Tehran were exclusively the work of ISIS and part of
the group’s global campaign. But in doing so, they risk adopting a skewed view
of Iran’s foreign relations and domestic stability.
While Iran is commonly referred to as Persia, it actually has a multi-ethnic
population. Close to half its citizens are non-Persian minorities, including
Azerbaijanis, Turkmen, Arabs, Baluch and Kurds – the latter make up about 10
percent of the population.
These ethnic minorities are located primarily in the country’s border regions
and share ties with co-ethnics in neighboring states: Turkey, Iraq, Azerbaijan
and Pakistan. This geographic proximity has significant bearing on Tehran’s
regional foreign policy and individual relations with most of its neighbors.
Tehran’s focus on ISIS as the driving force behind recent terror attacks is
right out of the country’s playbook for dealing with ethnic conflict. Even if
the Kurdish attackers cooperated with ISIS, their motivations and goals are very
different than other affiliates
Domestic stability
Iran’s multi-ethnic composition also affects domestic stability. For close to a
decade, Iranian security forces have been engaged in domestic armed conflict
with Kurdish and Baluch groups. A disproportionate number of Iranian Kurds,
including minors, are executed each year. While the offenders are often charged
with drug and smuggling crimes, many observers believe the high number of
executions is the result of ethnic politics rather than community crime.
This was even more evident in spring 2016, when a large number of Iranian Kurds
were executed for charges of “enmity to God” for membership in Kurdish political
organizations. While most of Iran’s Kurds and Baluch are Sunni, the basis of
their dissent seems mostly ethno-nationalist and not sectarian.
Iranian government representatives rarely acknowledge dissent or grievances
among the country’s ethnic minorities. But when the conflicts spill into the
political realm or the public eye, we get a better understanding of the concern
they cause. For example, during the recent presidential campaign the leading
candidates, Hassan Rouhani and Ebrahim Raisi, both appealed to Iran’s ethnic
minorities and promised to allow greater use of minority languages in attempt to
gain their votes. In addition, Leader Khamenei also warned foreigners against
stirring up ethnic minorities in efforts to interfere in Iran’s election
process.
And the impact of internal dissent goes well beyond political rhetoric – in
February, when members of Iran’s Arab community held massive demonstrations,
they successfully paralyzed the city of Ahvaz for days, which is the center of
Iran’s oil production.
Domestic grievances
Despite political promises, Iran’s leaders rarely take steps to address domestic
grievances. Instead, they typically blame outsiders for the activities of the
ethnic minorities, often depicting them as tools of foreign governments,
primarily Saudi Arabia, the US, Britain or Israel. And while Iran claims to be
an Islamic Republic that does not differentiate between Muslims on ethnic basis,
its leaders refuse to allow use of non-Persian languages in the official sphere
and the Iranian media tends to belittle non-Persian groups. Tehran’s focus on
ISIS as the driving force behind recent terror attacks is right out of the
country’s playbook for dealing with ethnic conflict. Even if the Kurdish
attackers cooperated with ISIS, their motivations and goals are very different
than other affiliates. And even while dozens of Kurds and Baluch have now been
jailed, this conflict is not going away anytime soon. Kurdish, Baluch and other
domestic ethnic groups in Iran have extensive grievances and there continues to
be fallout from the regular executions of activists from these communities.
Tehran’s official statements and ISIS finger-pointing would have us dismiss
domestic ethnic tensions as insignificant. But Iran’s modern history makes it
clear that, during periods of greater political turbulence, these tensions
impact the country and its wider political developments , such as during the
Islamic Revolution. As Western leaders assess developments in Iran, it’s
essential that they account for its multi-ethnic composition and domestic base
of terrorism, and the major role these play in the country’s stability and
foreign policy.
Google's YouTube - Soap Box for Terrorists
Ruthie Blum/Gatestone Institute/June 23/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10561/youtube-terrorists
If anyone still doubted at that point the connection between terrorism and
Google's video platform, the Daily Telegraph revealed that British
counterterrorism police had been monitoring a cell of ISIS "wannabes" since
March, and recorded its members discussing how to use YouTube to plot a
vehicular ramming and stabbing attack in London. Terrorists have learned that
YouTube can be as deadly a weapon as knives and cars.
YouTube and Google, by posting such videos, are effectively being accessories to
murder. They are also inviting class-action lawsuits from families and
individuals victimized by terrorism. They need to be held criminally liable for
aiding and abetting mass murder.
In Arabic with French subtitles, the clip lauds terrorists "martyred for Allah."
User comments include: "beautiful... may Allah give us all the knowledge and
power to accelerate our imams." In other words, the pictures of smiling
terrorists and their dead bodies serve as an inspiration to young Muslims
seeking Paradise through martyrdom. This is not theoretical. According to the
website Wired UK, as of June 5, there were 535 terrorist attacks around the
world -- with 3,635 fatalities -- since the beginning of 2017 alone.
In mid-March this year, major companies began withdrawing or reducing
advertising from Google Inc., the owner of YouTube, for allowing their brand
names to pop up alongside videos promoting jihad, a new report released on June
15 by the Middle East Research Media Institute (MEMRI) reveals.
According to the report -- which documents the failure of Google to remove
jihadi content that MEMRI volunteered to assist in flagging -- thus far, AT&T,
Verizon, Johnson & Johnson, Enterprise Holdings and GSK are among the companies
pulling their ads from the platform. Google responded by promising to be more
aggressive in ensuring brand safety of ad placements.
Then came the Westminster attack. On March 22, 2017, Khalid Masood rammed his
car into pedestrians -- killing four people and wounding dozens of others – then
stabbed an unarmed police officer to death.
Exactly two months later, on May 22, Salman Ramadan Abedi detonated a
shrapnel-laden homemade bomb at the Manchester Arena, after a concert by
American singer Ariana Grande. The blast killed 22 people and wounded more than
100 others.
On June 3, ahead of Britain's general election five days later, Khuram Shazad
Butt, Rachid Redouane and Youssef Zaghba murdered eight people and wounded 48
others in a combined van-ramming and stabbing attack on London Bridge.
On June 6, Britain's three main political parties pulled their campaign
advertisements from YouTube, after realizing that they were placed in or
alongside jihadi videos.
If anyone still doubted at that point the connection between terrorism and
Google's video platform, the Daily Telegraph revealed that British
counterterrorism police had been monitoring a cell of ISIS "wannabes" since
March, and recorded its members discussing how to use YouTube to plot a
vehicular ramming and stabbing attack in London.
Appallingly, the surveillance did nothing to prevent the carnage. It did provide
further evidence, however, that jihadis purposely use the major online platform
to spread their message and recruit soldiers in their war against the West and
any Muslims deemed "infidels." Terrorists have learned that YouTube can be as
deadly a weapon as cars and knives.
Nor could Google claim that it is unaware of the increasing pernicious use of
its platform, or that it lacks the algorithmic tools to monitor YouTube's
massive traffic – involving 1.3 billion users and 300 hours of video uploaded
every minute.
In the first place, complaints about jihadi content have been lodged by
individuals and organizations for years. Secondly, Google vowed to tackle the
problem through a flagging feature that alerts YouTube to material that
"promotes terrorism." Furthermore, YouTube itself claims: "Our staff reviews
flagged videos 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to determine whether they violate
our Community Guidelines."
In 2010, five years after YouTube's inception, MEMRI Executive Director Steven
Stalinsky met with Google and YouTube free-speech attorneys and other company
officials to discuss this issue in detail and offer assistance in monitoring
jihadi online activity. Nevertheless, despite YouTube's assurances, it has
continued to serve as a virtual soap box for radical imams and recruiters of
"martyrs" for missions against both general and specific targets.
During that period seven years ago, MEMRI also presented findings to members of
Congress from both sides of the aisle, resulting in written appeals from both
Democrats and Republicans to YouTube CEO Chad Hurley to take the matter
seriously and do something about it.
In spite of Tube's earlier promises, MEMRI found that most of the videos it had
flagged, beginning in 2010, remained online two and three years later.
The breakdown was as follows:
Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and 9/11 attack glorification videos – 100 were
flagged, 58 remained online.
Yemeni-American Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) cleric Anwar Al-Awlaki
videos – 127 were flagged, 111 remained online.
Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri videos – 125 were flagged, 57 remained online.
More recently, of the 115 videos that MEMRI flagged on YouTube in 2015, 69
remained active as of February 27, 2017. Many are still online to this day. Some
are so gruesome that the MEMRI report includes a warning to readers about
"graphic images."
One example is a clip titled: "A Martyr From the Taliban Laughs and Utters the
Two Declarations [Of Faith] Before He is Martyred." Posted on July 5, 2011 --
and viewed by nearly three million people -- it shows a terrorist welcoming
death with a smile on his face. The comments beneath the video are all in
Arabic.
Another, titled "Shuhada (Martyrs) Of Islam, Look They Are Smiling In Death,"
was posted on September 22, 2009, with the YouTube disclaimer, "This video may
be inappropriate for some users," and the user option: "I understand and wish to
proceed." In Arabic with French subtitles, the clip lauds terrorists "martyred
for Allah." User comments include: "beautiful... may Allah give us all the
knowledge and power to accelerate our imams." In other words, the pictures of
smiling terrorists and their dead bodies serve as an inspiration to young
Muslims seeking Paradise through martyrdom.
A screenshot from one of the terror-supporting jihadi videos on YouTube that was
flagged by MEMRI. The video remains on YouTube to this day.
This is not theoretical. According to the website Wired UK, as of June 5, there
were 535 terrorist attacks around the world -- with 3,635 fatalities -- since
the beginning of 2017 alone. It is only because the bulk of these attacks took
place in countries such as Nigeria, Yemen, Somalia and Bangladesh -- and
involved Muslims killing other Muslims -- that they were barely reported, and
even less noticed, in the West.
Whenever a Western country is targeted successfully, however, the issue of
global jihad hits the headlines – and now threatens to hurt the coffers of
social media giants that have been acting as enablers. According to analyst firm
Nomura Instinet, YouTube could lose $750 million in advertising revenue this
year, as a result of its "funding" of terrorism and, in effect, enabling of
wide-scale murder. Although this figure would not put Google in the red, it
represents a protest on the part of users increasingly concerned about
international security.
In what was clearly a move to counteract the latest outcry about jihadi videos
on YouTube, Google announced on June 18 that it was introducing a "four-step
plan" to "fight terrorism online," referring specifically to ISIS propaganda.
In an op-ed in the Financial Times and a subsequent post on "Google in Europe,"
Google General Counsel Kent Walker wrote:
"Terrorism is an attack on open societies, and addressing the threat posed by
violence and hate is a critical challenge for us all. Google and YouTube are
committed to being part of the solution. We are working with government, law
enforcement and civil society groups to tackle the problem of violent extremism
online. There should be no place for terrorist content on our services.
While we and others have worked for years to identify and remove content that
violates our policies, the uncomfortable truth is that we, as an industry, must
acknowledge that more needs to be done. Now."
The steps Walker listed were: increasing the use of technology to identify
terrorism-related videos; increasing the number of independent experts in
YouTube's "Trusted Flagger" program; making it harder for videos that do not
strictly violate YouTube's "community standards," but which contain extremist
content, to be located on the site; and implementing a "Redirect Method," to
send viewers in search of radical content to videos that debunk jihadi
recruitment messages.
Robert Spencer, of Jihad Watch, responded wryly to these ostensibly new
measures, including those that MEMRI found have not been implemented over the
years in any case:
"Google says it will put 'warnings on those videos and make them harder to
find.' Ten to one these warnings will end up going not on jihad videos, but on
anti-jihad videos."
Monetary pressure and public outcries are the methods used in democratic
countries to force Google to remove content that endangers lives. (Totalitarian
regimes, such as that of North Korea and Iran, simply ban YouTube.)
There is a greater problem, however, which cannot be solved by monetary or
technological means. The cultural (or multicultural) climate that has swept the
West is clouding the definitions of "incitement," "terrorism" and "extremism" in
relation to radical Islam.
It is this willful vagueness that has provided Google and YouTube with a cloak
against accusations that they are contributing to the spread of global jihad.
YouTube claims to be engaging in the "delicate balancing act" of supporting free
expression while countering
"content that promotes or condones violence against individuals or groups based
on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, nationality,
veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity, or whose primary purpose
is inciting hatred on the basis of these core characteristics... if the primary
purpose is to attack a protected group, the content crosses the line."
The message of jihad itself, which is being conveyed via video to potential
Islamist terrorists the world over, clearly and concretely meets each of these
criteria. However, since Muslims are treated in the West as a "protected group,"
it has become safer to rail against and attempt to combat "Islamophobia" than
Islamists.
This is exactly what has been happening since the June 19 attack on worshipers
exiting the Finsbury Park Mosque in north London. The perpetrator, Darren
Osborne -- a Briton who hates Muslims and set out to kill as many as possible --
is being denounced as an "Islamophobe" who was influenced by anti-Muslim
sentiment in the U.K.
As Andrew C. McCarthy argued after the attack, however:
"'Islamophobia' is a smear label dreamed up by the Muslim Brotherhood, designed
to demagogue any legitimate concern about Islamic doctrine as irrational fear
and, of course, as racism. The man who carried out the mosque attack is ... is a
vile specimen of anti-Muslim hatred, [but] his hatred does not render
Islamophobia real. It does not convert into hysteria our worries that a sizable
percentage of Muslims — for reasons that are easily knowable if one simply reads
scripture and listens to renowned sharia jurists — construes Islam to endorse
violence against non-Muslims and to command the imposition of oppressive sharia."
It is this atmosphere, in which liberals adopt concepts created by Islamist
radicals to invert terrorism and its victims, which has allowed Google and
YouTube to get away with promoting jihad for a profit, while disingenuously
hiding behind the banner of free speech.
Their lip service is no longer acceptable. From now on, if they do not keep
their word about combating terrorism, they must be held criminally liable for
aiding and abetting mass murder.
**Ruthie Blum is a journalist and author of "To Hell in a Handbasket: Carter,
Obama, and the 'Arab Spring.'"
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Terrorism is winning in Europe/ الإرهاب يربح في أوروبا
Nadav Eyal|/Ynetnews/June 23/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=56520
Op-ed: Victory on Western-based violent Islamism will only be achieved when
Muslim communities reject any manifestation of religious-political fanaticism in
a firm and uncompromising manner.
Muslim Germans took to the streets of Cologne several weeks ago to protest
terrorism. The march was held under the banner “Not with Us,” and its goal was
to condemn terrorism and the terror cells that have developed in the Muslim
communities in Europe in the past two years.
The newspapers were pretty excited about the event. They may not have said it
explicitly, but mass public activity by Muslim Europeans against Islamic
radicalization is a rare thing. The headlines stated that “tens of thousands of
protestors are expected.” That’s quite a modest number considering the fact
that, in the past two years alone, Germany has taken in some 900,000 refugees
from the Middle East. But when the day of the protest arrived, and a bitter
truth was revealed: Only several hundred people arrived. “Maybe 1,000,” one of
the organizers said dryly.
Where were the rest? They likely obeyed orders issued by one of the most
important Muslim organizations in Germany, the Turkish-Islamic Union for
Religious Affairs (DITIB), which decided to boycott the event. DITIB is a highly
significant organization, which is responsible for some 900 Muslim German
communities. It was followed by the Islamic Council, another Cologne-based
umbrella group, which stated that it would be “unreasonable” to expect Muslims
to march “in a heat of 25 degrees Celsius” while fasting in honor of the month
of Ramadan.
The religious Turkish group offered a more essential argument: Such a protest,
they said, establishes the claim that international terrorism is an exclusive
problem of the Muslim community and helps create stigmas against the community.
These are staggering arguments, as they deeply illustrate the huge discrepancy
between the radicalizing political discourse in the continent and its Muslim
communities that keep dozing off while radicals come out of them.
One after the other, terror attacks are striking the continent, and their
characteristics are more dangerous than usual. They are no longer carried out by
rare, sophisticated cells that work on the execution of an attack over a long
period time, exposing themselves to early detection and arrest. The current
European wave of terror is increasingly looking like an outburst of acts of
murder by individuals, cells of two-three people at the most. The European
security services are searching in vain for organized hierarchies in the
tradition of al-Qaeda. What they are noticing, though, is incitement and
opportunity attacks, in the tradition of the Middle East. Incidents of this kind
are hard to predict, and even harder to thwart, whether they take place at
Nablus Gate or on London Bridge. Their influence on the public perception,
however, is immense.
People say that terror can’t defeat the routine of life, but that’s a really old
cliché. The truth can be seen in the incident that took place at Piazza San
Carlo in Turin about a day after the terror attack in London. Thousands of
Juventus fans gathered at the square, when a firecracker suddenly exploded and
someone shouted, “There’s a bomb.” It immediately created a hysterical stampede,
which led to the injury of more than 1,000 people, some sustaining serious
injuries. One woman even died of her wounds several days later. Terrorism won
there, it won big time, and it wins when European politics changes because of
it.
It also wins when Europe's Muslim communities focus on providing excuses to
their internal radicalization trends: The Western attitude towards the Middle
East, pushing the minorities to the suburbs, the basic inequality in European
societies, and so on. These are social explanations that make sense, but when
they are joined by the communities’ limited activity against Islamist
radicalism—it means that these are just excuses. Plans against radicalization in
Britain and in other countries are subject to profound criticism from the Muslim
communities, which fear the stigma more than they fear radicalization itself.
The victory on Western-based violent Islamism will only be achieved when the
communities themselves reject any manifestation of religious-political
fanaticism in a firm and uncompromising manner. In certain places, it’s already
happening. Friends of the Manchester terrorist reported him to the British
security authorities before he carried out the attack. In most leading mosques,
the community heads report young people engaged in incitement and violence, but
they do it secretly, almost with a sense of shame. But still, when a public
protest is being held, the leaders of important organizations turn their noses
up at it.
Rejecting terror is both a human and a religious duty, but if these arguments
are not enough, then community leaders must understand the political
significance of it; If European Islamist terrorism turns into lone-wolf
terrorism, the communities will suffer deeply and Europe will experience a new
wave of xenophobia, the kind of which it has not seen in a long time.
**Nadav Eyal is Channel 10's chief international correspondent.