LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
May 03/2019
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews19/english.may03.19.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
You fool! This very night your life is being
demanded of you. And the things you have prepared, whose will they be?”So it is
with those who store up treasures for themselves but are not rich towards God
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 12/16-21: “Then he told them
a parable: ‘The land of a rich man produced abundantly. And he thought to
himself, “What should I do, for I have no place to store my crops?” Then he
said, “I will do this: I will pull down my barns and build larger ones, and
there I will store all my grain and my goods. And I will say to my soul, Soul,
you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry.” But
God said to him, “You fool! This very night your life is being demanded of you.
And the things you have prepared, whose will they be?”So it is with those who
store up treasures for themselves but are not rich towards God.’”. But if
through my falsehood God’s truthfulness abounds to his glory, why am I still
being condemned as a sinner?” Letter to the Romans 03/01-07: “What advantage has
the Jew? Or what is the value of circumcision? Much, in every way. For in the
first place the Jews were entrusted with the oracles of God. What if some were
unfaithful? Will their faithlessness nullify the faithfulness of God? By no
means! Although everyone is a liar, let God be proved true, as it is written,
‘So that you may be justified in your words, and prevail in your judging.’ But
if our injustice serves to confirm the justice of God, what should we say? That
God is unjust to inflict wrath on us? (I speak in a human way.) By no means! For
then how could God judge the world? But if through my falsehood God’s
truthfulness abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?”
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese
& Lebanese Related News published on May 02-03/19
Lebanon Urgently Needs A New
Patriotic Non-Religious Political Coalition
Aoun to Rotary delegation: Holding conferences in Lebanon testimony of stability
Cabinet approves 25 budget articles
Central Bank employees to go on strike Friday and Saturday
Jumblat Says Hizbullah Must Realize 'Only the State Can Protect Them'
Nasrallah Says Jumblat Remarks Worthless, Vows to 'Crush' Any Israeli Invaders
Exemptions for MPs, Ministers Revoked as Budget Debate Continues
Salameh Affirms Stability of Lebanese Pound Says ‘It Will Remain Stable’
Hariri Holds Talks with Madbouly
Mustaqbal, Berri's Bloc Discuss Draft Electoral Law
Samples Collected from Oil Spill Offshore Jiyeh
Report: ‘Ain Dara’ Augments Contention between PSP, Hizbullah
Jarrah Says Cabinet to Finalize Budget this Week
Sayegh Blames Authority's Mismanagement for Current Situation
Marouni Says Lebanese Government Is 'Schizophrenic'
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on May 02-03/19
One Dead, 46 Hurt in Venezuela May Day Clashes
Opposition Figure Lopez Ordered Arrested in Venezuela
Trump Says 'Brutal Repression' of Venezuelan People 'Must End'
Israel Says Hits Hamas Site after Arson Balloons
Senior Hamas Official Heads to Egypt for Talks on Israel
UAE Says Priority in Libya is Fighting 'Terrorism'
Saudi-Led Coalition Hits Yemen Rebel Drone Site
Four More Saudi Women Activists Freed Pending Trial
Sudan's Bashir to be Questioned over 'Financing Terrorism'
Russia, Syrian army step up attacks against rebel held northwestern Syria
Litles For The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous
sources published
on May 02-03/19
Lebanon Urgently Needs A New Patriotic Non-Religious Political Coalition/Elias
Bejjani/May 02/2019
Holiday Massacres of Christians: A New Fact of Life/Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone
Institute/May 02/19
European Elections: "The Battle for Europe has Begun"/Soeren Kern/Gatestone
Institute/May 02/19
Jordanian Journalist: Israel's Leaders Are Implementing 'The Protocols Of The
Elders Of Zion' In Full/MEMRI/May 02/2019
Analysis/Muslim Brotherhood: Terrorist Group or Political Movement?/Zvi Bar'el/Haatrz/May
02/19
The fight against terrorism will not be won quickly/Sir John Jenkins/Arab
News/May 02/19
Iranian regime using foreign prisoners as political pawns/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab
News/May 02/19
The trials and tribulations of Carlos Ghosn in the Japanese justice system/Ahmad
Elhusseini/Al Arabiya/May 02/2019
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese
Related News published
on May 02-03/19
Lebanon Urgently Needs A New Patriotic
Non-Religious Political Coalition
Elias Bejjani/May 02/2019
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/74435/elias-bejjani-lebanon-urgently-needs-a-new-patriotic-non-religious-political-coalition/
Our beloved Lebanon is currently encountering a set of very serious and dire
existential dangers on all levels and in all domains, as a result of the on
going Iranian destructive hegemony, oppression and occupation.
The occupier is the Hezbollah Party, which is totally and in every and each
aspect is an Iranian terrorist, denominational armed proxy.
This merciless terrorist occupier is gradually and systematically devouring the
country and aggressively destroying all that is Lebanon and Lebanese.
Hezbollah’s ultimate aim as its manifesto shows is to topple the existing
Lebanese multicultural, Non- religious, democratic and free regime and erect in
its place a Shiite Muslim religious republic, a replicate of the Iranian
Mullahs’ dictatorship regime.
Meanwhile the majority of the Lebanese political parties, politicians and
officials have already succumbed to this terrorist occupier and openly and with
no shame abandoned all their patriotic, sovereign, constitutional duties and
obligations.
Sadly the majority of these Lebanese political and official top notch figures
are appeasing the occupier, and serving its Mullahs’ agenda on the account of
the country’s independence, existence, freedom, democracy, stability and the
welfare of the Lebanese citizens.
For all the above critical and extremely threatening national reasons, there is
an urgent need to form as quickly as possible a new sovereign, non-religious,
and patriotic coalition.
For such a coalition to survive, stand for Hezbollah and succeed, its members
ought to be from all the diversified Lebanese denominations and all walks of
life.
These members and in a bid to make a difference on the Lebanese political arena
are supposed to be brave, honest, patriotic, conscientious and most importantly
have no hidden personal power agendas.
The main objective of this coalition and its first priority must be to stand up
peacefully and democratically for Hezbollah’s destructive hegemony, impose a
kind of political power balance, and stop Iran from fully controlling and
annexing Lebanon.
In conclusion, Each and every patriotic Lebanese in Lebanon and in Diaspora MUST
never ever keep a blind eye on the fact that Lebanon, the “Land of the Cedars”
is a holy and blessed country, and that their holy obligation is to defend and
safeguard its independence and sovereignty.
This coalition is an urgent patriotic need, hopefully it will be formed and
become a reality before it is too late.
Aoun to Rotary delegation: Holding conferences in Lebanon
testimony of stability
Thu 02 May 2019/NNA - President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, on
Thursday deemed the convening of regional and international conferences in
Lebanon, including yesterday’s Rotary International Conference, which included
more than 700 people from eight countries, was an outright testimony of
stability in Lebanon. "This achievement has been made thanks to the endeavors of
the Lebanese themselves,” Aoun said. "The existence of Lebanon as a
multi-religious and multicultural country is due to the people's belief in the
principles of coexistence, which include respect for the other's beliefs and
freedom, as well as respect for the right to be different," Aoun maintained. The
President’s words came before a delegation from Rotary International, headed by
Secretary-General, John Hewko, who briefed him on "the sixth conference of the
Rotary Clubs, which includes nine countries belonging to the Mediterranean
region and the Caucasus."Separately, President Aoun met with head of the
Lebanese Democratic Party, MP Talal Arslan, and Minister of Displaced, Saleh Al-Gharib,
with whom he broached the general situation in the country, and the current
political developments. Also, President Aoun discussed similar issues with the
Secretary General of Tashnag Party, MP Agop Pakradounian.
Cabinet approves 25 budget articles
Thu 02 May 2019/NNA - When the meeting of the Council of Ministers dedicated to
the budget ended this afternoon at the Grand Serail, the Minister of Information
Jamal Jarrah said: “There has been a very important progress today regarding the
discussion of the articles. We reached article 25, which has been completed, and
the Cabinet will meet again tomorrow at 1:30 pm to discussion the remaining
articles. The most important items approved concern the cancellation of
exemptions on the registration and customs of cars for MPs and ministers, we all
agreed on this, and we approved to impose fees on the distinctive numbers and
those of three or four figures, and tomorrow we will discuss the fees. We added
a new tax bracket for the amounts exceeding LBP 225 million, which means that we
added a slice to the income tax for the high amounts that do not affect the
middle and low income people, but the categories whose profits exceed LBP 225
million. There was also an in-depth discussion on tax and economic reforms and
tomorrow we will have an answer from the finance minister on their financial
impact on the treasury and on the state income. Customs exemptions that were
granted to some people, except those with special needs and the machines used in
agriculture and industry aimed at encouraging these sectors, were canceled”.
Asked about the atmosphere of the session after yesterday’s tensed meeting, he
said: “What happened yesterday was caused by some statements that affected the
atmosphere of the meeting and I hope that it ended. Today, it was a very quiet
session, with a deep discussion and an understanding on all the decisions we
took”. Asked if there would be a session Saturday, he said: “No session on
Saturday. Regarding Sunday, it depends. If the holy month of Ramadan begins on
Sunday, the session will be held on Monday”.
Central Bank employees to go on strike Friday and Saturday
Thu 02 May 2019/NNA - Lebanon's Central Bank employees on Thursday announced
that they will observe a two-day strike as of tomorrow (Friday), in protest at
the attempts to tampers with their salaries and benefits.
Addressing the President, the House Speaker and the Prime Minister, BDL
employees' syndicate sternly rejected in a statement "the fierce attack on the
Central Bank," stressing that the bank enjoys administrative and financial
independence. The employees also indicated that they would opt for open-ended
strike if the concerned officials did not respond to their calls.
Jumblat Says Hizbullah Must Realize 'Only the State Can Protect Them'
Naharnet/May 02/19/Progressive Socialist Party leader ex-MP Walid Jumblat said
Thursday that Hizbullah "will realize one day that only the state can protect
them.""The party represents a certain segment of the Lebanese people but also
the Iranian expansion. But one day the conclusion that Lebanon is better for
Hizbullah than the Iranian expansion must be reached," Jumblat said in an
interview on Al-Arabiya TV. "This is inevitable but it needs time," he added.
"Our ambition is to see the Lebanese state alone taking charge one day of the
military, security and southern decisions through dialogue," Jumblat noted.
Asked about his relation with Hizbullah at the moment, Jumblat said: "We agreed
with the party on managing our disputes. We disagree with the party over the
issue of Syria and its intervention with the Iranians there. But at the same
time, we consider them to be an essential force in Lebanon, politically and of
course militarily."
Nasrallah Says Jumblat Remarks Worthless, Vows to 'Crush'
Any Israeli Invaders
Naharnet/May 02/19/Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah on Thursday hit out
at Druze leader Walid Jumblat without naming him, saying his remarks on the
identity of the Israeli-occupied Shebaa Farms are "worthless."
"As for the issue of the Shebaa Farms, the (Lebanese) state says that they're
Lebanese and this was mentioned in the governmental policy statements. This is a
settled and finalizef issue regardless of who says yes and who says no,"
Nasrallah said in a televised speech marking the death in Syria of Hizbulla
military commander Mustafa Badreddine. "As long as the state, the government and
the parliament consider the Shebaa Farms Lebanese territory, we do not have a
problem and the issue is settled. Accordingly, any other talk from anyone is
totally worthless and irrelevant," Nasrallah added. Jumblat has announced that
the Farms are not Lebanese but rather Syrian seeing as Lebanon has failed to
submit the necessary documents to the U.N. Separately, Nasrallah said reports of
an imminent Israeli war on Lebanon are aimed at pressing the Lebanese state to
"surrender and offer concessions."
"America is seeking Lebanese concessions on the issue of the territorial and
maritime borders and the Shebaa Farms for the benefit of the Israeli enemy. It
is also seeking concessions regarding Lebanon's elements of strength, including
the resistance and its missiles," Nasrallah warned.
He added: "The Lebanese must not allow anyone to intimidate them, because
Lebanon is strong through its army, people and resistance and this strength is
real and serious."And revealing that Hizbullah has identified a target in Israel
that would cause more damage than the ammonia tanks if hit by a missile,
Nasrallah vowed that his group would "destroy and crush" any Israeli forces that
might try to enter into Lebanon in a future war. "That will be broadcast by
international TV channels," he added.
Exemptions for MPs, Ministers Revoked as Budget Debate
Continues
Naharnet/May 02/19/The Cabinet on Thursday agreed to revoke customs and
registration exemptions for cars owned by MPs and ministers and to slap fees on
special number plates as part of austerity measures related to the 2019 state
budget. Noting that progress has been made, Information Minister Jamal al-Jarrah
said another Cabinet session will be held Friday at 1:30 pm to continue the
discussions.Jarrah also reassured that any funds for the Road of the Saints
project will not be delayed, dismissing media reports that claimed otherwise.
Salameh Affirms Stability of Lebanese Pound Says ‘It Will
Remain Stable’
Naharnet/May 02/19/Central Bank Governor Riad Salameh assured during talks with
the President on Thursday that the Lebanese Lira is stable, noting that the Bank
will subsidize loans for the housing and productive sectors, the National News
Agency said. “The Lebanese Lira is stable and will remain stable,” said Salameh
during talks with President Michel Aoun in Baabda. “The Central Bank will
subsidize housing loans and loans for the productive sector,” he added.
Salameh’s remarks came as Lebanon struggles to impose austerity measures to
reduce a ballooning budget deficit and massive national debt over “collapse”
fears.
Hariri Holds Talks with Madbouly
Naharnet/May 02/19/Prime Minister Saad Hariri held talks on Thursday with
visiting Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly at the Grand Serail and
discussed the latest developments, the situation in Lebanon and the Arab region
and the bilateral relations between Lebanon and Egypt, the Premier’s media
office said.The meeting was attended by the Minister of Industry Wael Abou Faour,
Minister of Economy Mansour Bteish, Minister of Labor Camille Abu Sleiman,
Minister of Communications Mohammad Choucair, the Minister of State for
Information Technology Adel Afiouni, Minister of Energy Nada Boustani, Lebanese
Ambassador to Egypt Ali Halabi, Former Minister Ghattas Khoury, the
Secretary-General of the Council of Ministers Mahmoud Makiyye and a number of
advisers. From the Egyptian side, the Minister of Electricity and Renewable
Energy Mohammad Shaker, Minister of Investment and International Cooperation
Sahar Nasr, Minister of Petroleum and Mineral Resources Tarek El Molla, Minister
of Manpower Mohamed Saafan, Minister of Communications and Information
Technology Amr Talaat, Minister of Trade and Industry Amr Nassar, Egyptian
Ambassador to Lebanon Nazih Naggari, and the Secretary General of the Council of
Ministers Major General Atef Abd elFattah and a number of advisors attended.
Mustaqbal, Berri's Bloc Discuss Draft Electoral Law
Naharnet/May 02/19/MPs from the Development and Liberation bloc of Speaker Nabih
Berri and the al-Mustaqbal bloc of PM Saad Hariri held talks Thursday at the
Center House.A statement issued by Mustaqbal said the meeting was held at
Development and Liberation's request with the aim of discussing a draft
electoral law prepared by the latter. "It was agreed to continue discussions
over this topic during future meetings," the statement added. The meeting was
attended on Mustaqbal's side by the MPs Bahia Hariri, Dima Jamali, Sami Fatfat,
Henry Chedid and Tareq al-Merehbi and by the MPs Anwar al-Khalil, Hani Qobeissi
and Ibrahim Azar on the side of Berri's bloc. The proposal aims to replace the
complex and controversial 2018 electoral law which was based on proportional
representation for the first time in Lebanon's history.
Samples Collected from Oil Spill Offshore Jiyeh
Naharnet/May 02/19/Research teams from the Lebanese Army, Civil Defense and the
Environment Ministry collected samples on Thursday from the oil leak spotted a
day earlier offshore the Jiyeh coastal area, LBCI TV station.
Residents of Jiyeh and Jadra posted photos of sheen offshore. The sheen was
reportedly the result of either a leak from one of the power generating ships or
from the EDL thermal plant in Jiyeh. But Electricte du Liban announced in a
statement that it kicked inspections and found no leak from Jiyeh plant. MP
Mohammed Hajjar warned of the “environmental problem” and urged related
authorities to take quick measures before the leak expands further. “A quick
response is required on behalf of the ministry of environment, energy, and the
(state-owned) Electricite du Liban.”It was reported that the leak has extended
nearly two kilometers from the shore and nearly 200 meters deep.
Report: ‘Ain Dara’ Augments Contention between PSP, Hizbullah
Naharnet/May 02/19/The relation between the Progressive Socialist Party and
Hizbullah has “never” experienced a “break-like stalemate” and a “unilateral”
decision taken by Hizbullah without prior “warning,” Asharq al-Awsat said on
Thursday. Ties between the two have reportedly been tense against the backdrop
of a decision taken by PSP Industry Minister Wael Abou Faour, cancelling a
cement factory permit in Ain Dara -in the district of Aley not far from the
Chouf cedar reserve- issued by his predecessor Hizbullah ex-Minister Hussein
Hajj Hassan.Political sources following on the course of relations told the
newspaper that the PSP leadership has “informed Hizbullah of Jumblat’s will to
meet Hizbullah secretary-general's political aide, Hussein Khalil, to discuss
the political developments and the relationship between the two parties.”The
sources said that Jumblat’s desire was “conveyed” to Khalil but the latter did
not give an answer despite knowing that Jumblat was ready to meet him, they
said. “It turned out that Abou Faour's permit cancellation was considered an
insult to Hizbullah and to its Minister.”This cement project has long been
controversial between its owners of the Fattoush family, on the one hand, and
the Ain Dara municipal council and many citizens and activists, on the other.
Jumblat and former minister Nicolas Fattoush are at loggerheads over the cement
factory in Ain Dara area. The factory is owned by Fattoush's brother, Pierre.
The cancellation of this permit was itself the subject of press campaigns close
to Hizbullah earlier in April.
Jarrah Says Cabinet to Finalize Budget this Week
Naharnet/May 02/19/When the meeting of the Council of Ministers ended at the
Grand Serail Wednesday, the Minister of Information Jamal Jarrah said the
Cabinet plans to finalize discussions of the state budget this week. "This is
the second meeting of the Council of Ministers after the first session that was
presided Tuesday in Baabda presidential palace by President Michel Aoun to
examine the budget," said Jarrah. There has been an extensive discussion on the
budget targets that have become known, namely reducing the deficit and
stimulating economic growth. There has been also a serious and profound debate
on these issues and we started to formulate important ideas to stimulate
economic growth and control spending," he added. Jarrah added: "After that, we
moved to the approval of some articles, and another meeting will be held
Thursday at noon to continue discussions on the remaining articles. During this
week, sessions will be held to finalize the study of the draft budget as soon as
possible”.
Sayegh Blames Authority's Mismanagement for Current
Situation
Kataeb.org/ Thursday 02nd May 2019/Kataeb's Deputy-President Salim Sayegh blamed
the ruling authority's mismanagement and incompetence for the growing challenges
facing Lebanon, stressing the need for a reformist revolution that would address
the flaws plaguing the state. In an interview with Lebanon Files website, Sayegh
condemned the government's plan to cut the pensions and the end-of-service
benefits granted to the military veterans as part of its austerity budget,
blasting the authority's failure to manage public funds for leading to the
current bottleneck. “Had Lebanon had the basic foundations of a state, this
would’ve been enough to spark a revolution," Sayegh said. “The state has to
initiate a peaceful inner revolution and to change its approach before the
current situation turns into a different type of revolution." “People don’t
trust their current rulers as it is not possible to enforce an austere policy
without being honest about everything that is planned to be done. No reassuring
solutions have given so that everyone would feel ready to make sacrifices,” he
noted. Sayegh called on the government to take different measures in order to
reduce the state's deficit, adding that the proposed budget is only putting the
problems on hold without diagnozing and treating the problems. Deferring
solutions implies a denial of the status quo which is weighing down on the
Lebanese politics, Sayegh warned. The Kataeb official stressed that the party is
a "100% opposition force" which derives its strength from specific "objective"
and "sectoral" alliances. “Everything is clear for the Kataeb party: there is
not state in the presence of internal statelets," he stressed. “Everything that
is happening is nothing but momentary solutions while there should've been a
bigger political confrontation to establish a real balance in the country," he
said.
“Trespassing this balance is a surrender,” Sayegh concluded.
Marouni Says Lebanese Government Is 'Schizophrenic'
Kataeb.org/ Thursday 02nd May 2019/Former Minister Elie Marouni on Thursday
described the ruling authority as "schizophrenic", deeming the current situation
in Lebanon as terrifying. “We are living our worst days as we are witnessing
severe setbacks on all levels, be it economic, social or financial,” Marouni
said in an interview with Voice of Lebanon radio station. “We are going through
the weirdest days and this is all because of the government's split into two
sub-cabinets, A and B,” he noted. Marouni pointed out that the previous
government also suffered a rift because there were ministers who went to Syria
while others refused to do so. "In the present government, there are also
sub-cabinets A and B as we hear a minister denying salary cuts while another one
confirms the plan," he noted. “In all countries around the world, the budget is
adopted to ensure prosperity and development. It is a shame how it became
frightening to the citizens in Lebanon,” he said.
Latest LCCC English Miscellaneous Reports & News published
on May 01-02/19
One Dead, 46 Hurt in Venezuela May Day Clashes
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 02/19/May Day clashes between opposition
supporters and Venezuela's armed forces in Caracas left a woman dead and 46
people injured on Wednesday, with opposition leader Juan Guaido attempting to
rally demonstrators against President Nicolas Maduro.
Jurubith Rausseo, 27, died at a clinic after being hit by a "bullet in the head
during (a) demonstration," the non-governmental Venezuelan Observatory of Social
Conflict said on Twitter, condemning her "murder."Human rights organizations and
health services reported 46 people injured in Wednesday's clashes, including one
person with a gunshot wound. Tensions in Venezuela have soared since Guaido, who
heads the National Assembly legislature, invoked the constitution to declare
himself acting president on January 23, claiming Maduro's re-election last year
was illegitimate. National Guard troops fired tear gas at stone-throwing
protesters attempting to block a highway close to the air base in eastern
Caracas where Guaido had tried on Tuesday to spark a military uprising. A second
day of confrontations between opposition supporters and Maduro's security
services came as the United States said it was prepared to take military action,
if necessary, to stem the crisis in the South American nation. At least one
journalist was injured when National Guard soldiers fired rubber bullets at a
group of reporters covering the clashes. Miguel Ramirez, 17, told AFP at one
medical center that he had been shot in the foot while protesting on the highway
near the La Carlota air base. "I didn't manage to run and hide," he said. Guaido
rallied his supporters in Caracas in the Labor Day demonstrations, urging them
to stay in the streets. His appeal came despite the apparent failure the day
before of a revolt by some soldiers and members of the Bolivarian National Guard
who joined his side. In Tuesday's clashes, one person was killed and dozens
injured, according to human rights monitors. More than 150 people were arrested,
the government and human rights organizations said. UN Secretary General Antonio
Guterres warned Venezuela's authorities not to use deadly force against
demonstrators, while the US and Russia accused each other of making the crisis
worse, evoking Cold War confrontations of the past. In a phone call with Russian
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accused Moscow
of "destabilizing" Venezuela.
- 'Nothing to celebrate' -
Lavrov, in turn, charged that US interference was "destructive" and "in flagrant
violation of international law.""There is nothing for workers to celebrate,"
Guaido told supporters in the oil-rich country suffering from hyperinflation and
food and medicine shortages that have driven millions to flee.
"We're going to remain in the streets until we achieve freedom for the
Venezuelan people. "The regime will try to increase the repression. It will try
to persecute me, to stage a coup d'etat," said Guaido, recognized by more than
50 countries as the country's interim president. He said staggered industrial
action would begin on Thursday, leading to a general strike. Before thousands of
his own supporters in front of Miraflores palace on May Day, Maduro declared he
will have "no hesitation" to lock up those responsible for this "criminal coup
d'etat," threats recalling those he made the previous day. In his Wednesday
address, Maduro alleged that the "so-called coup d'etat" had been organized
"from the White House" by US National Security Advisor John Bolton.
- 'Serious crimes' -
Hours after the revolt by military members appeared to have fizzled out, Pompeo
told CNN he believed Maduro was ready to flee to ally Cuba before he was
dissuaded by Russia -- a claim Maduro later refuted as "a joke."A senior
Brazilian official said at least 25 Venezuelan troops had sought asylum at its
Caracas embassy. Venezuela's security forces number around 365,000 including
military and police, as well as 1.6 million civilian reservists. Pompeo said on
Wednesday that Washington wants a peaceful transfer of power but warned that US
President Donald Trump is prepared to take military action if necessary. "The
president has been crystal clear and incredibly consistent. Military action is
possible. If that's what's required, that's what the United States will do,"
Pompeo told Fox Business Network.
- 'Living through hell' -
Venezuela has suffered five years of recession marked by shortages of basic
necessities as well as failing public services, including water, electricity and
transport. "We're living through hell," a resident of western Caracas, Evelinda
Villalobos, 58, told AFP. "I believe the people in the streets will be the straw
that breaks the camel's back." Another demonstrator, Patricia Requena, 40, said
that "yesterday we saw soldiers recognizing our interim president. We have to
stay in the streets." She vowed: "I'll keep demonstrating as long as God allows
me to."Michael Shifter, an analyst with the Inter-American Dialogue, told AFP
the US approach to Venezuela was "unhelpful and often counterproductive." "The
US is right to back Guaido in his battle against Maduro," said Shifter. "But
beyond being on the right side, the administration is making it harder, not
easier, to achieve a democratic transition in Venezuela."
Opposition Figure Lopez Ordered Arrested in Venezuela
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 02/19/Venezuela's top court on Thursday
ordered the arrest of opposition figure Leopoldo Lopez, who has sought refuge in
the Spanish embassy since claiming to have been freed from house arrest two days
ago by rebel military personnel. Lopez, who was imprisoned in 2014 and
transfered to house arrest three years later, made a sensational public
appearance alongside opposition leader Juan Guaido on Tuesday as the National
Assembly president tried to incite a military uprising against President Nicolas
Maduro.
Trump Says 'Brutal Repression' of Venezuelan People 'Must
End'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 02/19/President Donald Trump appealed on
Monday for a swift end to the "brutal repression" of the Venezuelan people,
following an abortive military uprising in support of the U.S.-backed opposition
leader Juan Guaido. "I'd like to begin by sending our prayers to the people of
Venezuela in their righteous struggle for freedom," Trump said as he hosted a
national prayer service at the White House. "The brutal repression of the
Venezuelan people must end, and it must end soon," he warned. Trump's call
followed two days of anti-government unrest in Venezuela that have left four
people dead, and as President Nicolas Maduro urged the armed forces to oppose
"any coup plotter." The United States, which recognizes Guaido as interim
president, has imposed tough sanctions in an intensifying campaign to drive
Maduro from power, as millions have fled the country's economic meltdown.
"People are starving. They have no food, they have no water, and this was once
one of the wealthiest countries in the world," said Trump. "So we wish them
well, we'll be there to help and we are there to help." The United States is
insisting Maduro's days remain numbered, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
warned Wednesday that "military action is possible." But experts warn of limited
options to break a protracted stalemate in which Washington may have
overestimated the opposition leader's strength.
Israel Says Hits Hamas Site after Arson Balloons
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 02/19/Israel said Thursday its aircraft struck
a Hamas military site in the Gaza Strip overnight after balloons carrying
firebombs and explosives were launched from the Palestinian enclave. Following
the airstrike, Israel's military said there had been two "launches" -- likely
rockets -- from the Gaza Strip toward Israel. No further details on the launches
were immediately available. The airstrike hit targets within what Israel's army
called a Hamas military compound in the northern Gaza Strip. There had so far
been no reports of injuries. It was unclear if the firebombs and explosives that
prompted it caused any damage within Israel. Palestinians in Gaza have been
regularly sending balloons carrying firebombs over the border fence to damage
Israeli property and have in the past succeeded in setting fire to large areas
of farmland. An Egyptian and UN-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, the
Islamist movement that runs the Gaza Strip, had led to relative calm around
Israel's April 9 election. But on Tuesday, Israel reduced the offshore fishing
limit it imposes for vessels operating out of the blockaded strip after a rocket
was fired from the territory by Palestinian militants. The rocket fell into the
Mediterranean. Israel's military blamed the launch on Islamic Jihad, which is
allied to Hamas. Israel and Palestinian militants in Gaza have fought three wars
since 2008.
Senior Hamas Official Heads to Egypt for Talks on Israel
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 02/19/A Hamas delegation led by its Gaza head
Yahya Sinwar left the enclave for Cairo on Thursday for talks with Egyptian
officials on a truce with Israel, Hamas officials said. Egypt has long been the
broker between Israel and the Islamist group that runs Gaza. In November it
brokered a fragile truce agreement whereby Israel eases its blockade of the Gaza
Strip in exchange for calm. That agreement has appeared to be under stress in
recent days, with Israel carrying out airstrikes early Thursday in response to
Palestinian firebombs across the Gaza border.Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said
that Sinwar "left Gaza for Cairo at the invitation of the head of the Egyptian
intelligence service, Major General Abbas Kamal".The visit was aimed at
discussing "bilateral relations and ways to lessen the suffering of our people,"
he said in a statement. A Hamas official said the truce agreement would be
discussed. Islamic Jihad, a Hamas-allied group, said its head will also attend
the meetings. Israel carried out air raids early Thursday morning on "a number
of terror targets in a Hamas military compound in the northern Gaza Strip," a
military statement said. It said that they were in response to the launching of
incendiary and explosive balloons from Gaza into Israel. Border clashes have
been taking place for over a year during weekly demonstrations. At least 265
Palestinians have been killed since the protests began in March 2018, the
majority in border clashes.
Two Israeli soldiers have been killed.
UAE Says Priority in Libya is Fighting 'Terrorism'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 02/19/The UAE said on Thursday that fighting
"terrorism" was the priority in Libya, where it has backed a controversial
military strongman against the U.N.-recognised government in Tripoli. The United
Arab Emirates, and its allies Egypt and Saudi Arabia, regard Khalifa Haftar and
his Libyan National Army militia as a bulwark against Islamist groups which are
among the supporters of the Government of National Accord. Haftar launched an
assault on forces loyal to the government in and around the capital on April 4,
triggering fighting that has killed 376 people, according to the World Health
Organization. "Priority in Libya to counter extremism/terrorism and support
stability in long drawn out crisis," the UAE minister of state for foreign
affairs, Anwar Gargash, said on Twitter. "Abu Dhabi agreement offered
opportunity to support U.N.-led process. "Meanwhile, extremist militias continue
to control capital and derail search for political solution," Gargash said. The
Abu Dhabi agreement he referred to was a renewed commitment to organising
nationwide elections that Haftar and unity government leader Fayez al-Sarraj
made after a U.N.-backed meeting in the UAE capital on February 27. But even as
he met Sarraj, Haftar's forces were pressing on with an offensive that saw them
overrun virtually all of the oasis towns and oilfields of Libya's vast southern
desert before turning their sights on government forces in Tripoli. The UAE
stands accused by the U.N. of providing Haftar with military aircraft and other
heavy weaponry which has played a major role in the offensives' success. The
U.N. had hoped to convene a conference in the Libyan oasis town of Ghadames last
month to draw up a roadmap for the elections but was forced to cancel it in the
face of the upsurge of fighting. The WHO says more than 1,800 people have been
wounded in the fighting, which has turned some southern districts of the capital
into war zones, while more than 40,000 civilians have fled their homes. A
British-led effort to secure agreement within the U.N. Security Council on a
demand for a ceasefire has run into the ground after the United States withheld
its support in an apparent tilt towards Haftar.Major powers are deeply divided
over the conflict. Russia has openly refused to condemn Haftar's offensive.
France has acknowledged supporting Haftar's campaign against armed Islamist
groups but has denied it was forewarned about his assault on Tripoli.
Saudi-Led Coalition Hits Yemen Rebel Drone Site
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 02/19/The Saudi-led coalition fighting in
Yemen raided a drone facility used by Huthi rebels at an airbase in the capital
Sanaa, a spokesman said. The coalition has ramped up attacks on such sites after
the Iran-aligned rebels warned last month they could launch attacks against the
capitals of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which lead the military
coalition against them. The latest raid late Wednesday targeted "drone
maintenance sites, a communications system and locations of drone experts and
operators" at the Al-Dulaimi base adjoining the airport in rebel-held Sanaa, the
official Saudi Press Agency quoted coalition spokesman Colonel Turki al-Maliki
as saying. The Huthi-controlled Saba news agency said 13 air strikes targeted
the base and airport. The coalition last month said it targeted a cave in Sanaa
used by Huthi rebels to stockpile drones. The raid came after the coalition
reported last month that Saudi air defences had intercepted two drones launched
by Huthi rebels that targeted Khamis Mushait, home to a major airbase in the
southwest of the kingdom. And in January the Huthis launched a drone attack on
Yemen's largest airbase, Al-Anad, north of the southern port of Aden, during a
military parade. Eleven people were wounded in the attack, including Yemen's
deputy chief of staff Major General Saleh al-Zandani who later died of his
injuries. Seven other loyalists -- including a high-ranking intelligence
official -- were killed in the attack. Yemen is mired in a grinding conflict
between the Iran-aligned Huthi rebels and a government backed up by a Saudi-led
coalition. The Saudi-led coalition launched its first raids on rebel strongholds
in March 2015 in a bid to bolster President Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi, who now
lives in Riyadh. Since then the conflict has killed some 10,000 people,
according to the World Health Organization, although human rights groups say the
toll could be five times higher. The unrest has also pushed the country to the
brink of famine.
Four More Saudi Women Activists Freed Pending Trial
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 02/19/At least four more detained Saudi women
activists were released pending trial on Thursday, campaigners said, bringing
the total number of women provisionally freed to seven. "Hatoon al-Fassi, Amal
al-Harbi, Maysaa al-Manea, and Abeer Namankani were temporarily released,"
London-based rights group ALQST said on Twitter, adding there were unconfirmed
reports about the release of a fifth activist. Another campaigner close to the
families of 11 women on trial told AFP five women had been temporarily released.
Sudan's Bashir to be Questioned over 'Financing Terrorism'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/May 02/19/Sudan's prosecutor general has ordered
the questioning of deposed president Omar al-Bashir over money-laundering and
"financing terrorism", the official SUNA news agency said on Thursday. "The
acting public prosecutor general Al-Waleed Sayyed Ahmed has ordered the
questioning of former president Omar al-Bashir... under anti-money laundering
and financing terrorism laws," SUNA said.A source in the prosecutor general's
office confirmed the state media report to AFP.
Russia, Syrian army step up attacks against rebel held
northwestern Syria
Reuters, Amman/Thursday, 02 May 2019/Russian and Syrian forces intensified air
strikes and ground shelling in northwestern Syria overnight in one of the
heaviest assaults on the last rebel bastion in recent months, opposition
members, rescuers and residents said on Thursday. The targeted villages and
towns in northern Hama and southern Idlib fall within a demilitarized zone
agreed last September between Russia and Turkey. Earlier this week Washington
warned violence in the buffer zone “will result in the destabilization of the
region.” Since Tuesday the Russian and Syrian military attacks have forced
thousands of civilians to flee to camps further north along the Turkish border
and damaged four medical facilities, according to Idlib civil defense officials
and a US medical aid organization working in the area. “Medical facilities are
being evacuated, leaving the most vulnerable with no access to medical care. We
are on the edge of a humanitarian catastrophe,” Khaula Sawah, vice president of
the US-based Union of Medical Care and Relief Organizations -USA (UOSSM US) said
in a statement on Wednesday. Syrian army helicopters have dropped barrel bombs,
which are drums or cylinders packed with explosives and shrapnel that cause
indiscriminate destruction, killing at least 15 civilians and injured dozens,
rescuers in Idlib province said. Opposition-run civil defense agencies say
hundreds of people, mostly civilians, have been killed by Russian and Syrian
strikes since the September deal which prevented a potentially devastating
offensive on Idlib and nearby areas controlled by rebels and now home to over 3
million people. Syrian state media, quoting army sources, blamed rebels for the
attacks and said it had targeted “terrorist groups” in towns in northern Hama
including Kafr Naboudah. Turkey, which has supported the rebels and has troops
to monitor the truce, has been negotiating with Moscow to halt the strikes with
little success. A military defector told Reuters on condition of anonymity that
the latest campaign could signal a ground offensive aimed at taking control of
territory in northern rural Hama province and southern Idlib countryside.
Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on May 01-02/19
Holiday Massacres of Christians: A New Fact of Life
Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/May 02/19
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14135/holiday-massacres-christians
Notably, other Christian holidays, especially Christmas, are also prime times
for Islamic terror, and for the same reasons -- to make a "point" and because at
that time, churches are especially packed.
Commenting on the most recent carnage of Christians -- last Easter Sunday's
bombing campaign in Sri Lanka, where more than 250 people were murdered -- the
country's archbishop said, "we never expected such a thing to happen and
especially on Easter Sunday."
Sadly, as bombed churches and massacred worshippers during Christian holy days
have become the new norm, he and everyone else should expect exactly that.
Although the Islamic terrorist bombings that rocked Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday
-- killing more than 250 people, most in churches -- have shocked many,
spectacular terrorist attacks on Easter are far more common than supposed.
Pictured: Officials inspect St. Sebastian's Church in Negombo, one of three
churches bombed in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday, April 21, 2019. (Photo by
Stringer/Getty Images)
Although the Islamic terrorist bombings that rocked Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday
-- killing more than 250 people, most in churches -- have shocked many,
spectacular terrorist attacks on Easter are far more common than supposed.
Jihadi logic is simple: not only do attacks on Christians during their greatest
holidays make a symbolic point; but because churches are often packed then --
especially Easter, or Resurrection Sunday -- they also potentially offer the
greatest harvest in casualties.
Therefore, on April 9, 2017 -- Palm Sunday, which starts the holy week of Easter
-- two Christian churches in Egypt were bombed during mass; at least 50
worshippers were murdered and 130 wounded (graphic images/video of aftermath
here). Two days later, another terror attack, targeting a Coptic Christian
monastery, was thwarted. On April 12, 2015, Easter Sunday, two explosions
targeting two separate churches also took place in Egypt. Although no casualties
were reported, large numbers could have resulted.
On Easter Sunday 2016, in Pakistan, an Islamic suicide bombing took place near
the children's rides in a public park, where Christians were known to be
celebrating and congregating. At least 74 people -- mostly women and children --
were killed and nearly 400 wounded. A similar massacre was in store for Pakistan
in 2017, as authorities foiled a "major terrorist attack" targeting Christians
on Easter.
Right before Good Friday 2015, jihadis raided a Kenyan university and murdered
147 people. The jihadis tried to distinguish between Muslim and Christian
students, in order to kill only the Christians. "This will be a good Easter
holiday for us," the jihadis said.
Celebrating Easter also seems to be especially dangerous in Nigeria. A church
was bombed on Easter Sunday 2012, killing 50 people. In 2013, during Easter
week, Muslim herdsmen launched a series of raids, murdering at least 80
Christians -- mostly children and the elderly. More than 200 Christian homes
were destroyed, eight churches burned, and 4,500 Christians displaced.
As for Easter this year, Muslim raiders murdered 11 Christians returning from
Good Friday church service in Nigeria; they also kidnapped and murdered a female
British aid worker. On Sunday, April 21, ten boys were killed during an Easter
procession. Emmanuel Ogebe, a Nigerian human rights lawyer remarked in an email,
"The Holy Week killings in Nigeria do not grab headlines like Sri Lanka but
still Nigeria's Christians are dying the deaths of a 1000 cuts in as many
installments!"
As Islam's presence continues to grow in Europe, Easter-related attacks are also
on the rise.
This Easter in Germany, a migrant man, apparently of Somali origin, entered a
church in Munich during Mass and threw dangerous objects, variously described as
stones or firecrackers, at worshippers while he shouted "Allahu Akbar" ("Allah
is greater"). Congregants dropped their Easter meal baskets on the ground and
rushed out in a panic. Some were injured and children were left in a "state of
shock." Predictably, authorities concluded that the assailant was "mentally ill"
and therefore not responsible for his actions.
According to one report, the jihadi terror cell that murdered 32 people in
Brussels on March 22, 2016, "was planning to massacre worshippers at Easter
church services across Europe, including Britain."
In Scotland, 2016, a Muslim man stabbed another Muslim man to death for wishing
Christians a Good Friday and Happy Easter.
Although deadly attacks on Christians have taken place every Easter in recent
years, less spectacular attacks and shows of hostility are all too common around
that Christian holiday. A brief list of examples follows:
Bangladesh: A Muslim mob attacked a Catholic village as it celebrated Easter in
2015. The mob stabbed the village priest, destroyed Bibles, crosses, holy
pictures, musical instruments and homes, and randomly slaughtered chickens and
goats.
Turkey: Muslims beat a pastor immediately after his Easter service and
threatened him with death unless he converted to Islam.
Iran: 12 Christians stood trial as "apostates" on Easter Sunday 2012, and in
2015, various churches were banned from celebrating Easter Sunday altogether.
Iraq: According to an AP report from 2013, "Iraq's Catholic Christians flocked
to churches to celebrate Easter Sunday, praying, singing and rejoicing in the
resurrection of Christ," but only "behind high blast walls and tight security
cordons."
Philippines: A cathedral had to cancel its 2018 Easter services after Islamic
terrorists completely ransacked it.
Notably, other Christian holidays, especially Christmas, are also prime times
for Islamic terror, and for the same reasons -- to make a "point" and because at
that time, churches are especially packed. In Cairo, Egypt, a church was bombed,
killing 27 people near Christmas 2016. On New Year's Day 2011 -- which Orthodox
Christians usher in at church - another Egyptian church was bombed, killing 23
worshippers. (For dozens more anecdotes of Muslim violence against and slaughter
of Christians around Christmas, see here for Christmas 2018, here for Christmas
2017, here for Christmas 2016, here for Christmas 2015, and here for Christmas
2014.)
Commenting on the most recent carnage of Christians -- last Easter Sunday's
bombing campaign in Sri Lanka, where more than 250 people were murdered -- the
country's archbishop said, "we never expected such a thing to happen and
especially on Easter Sunday."
Sadly, as bombed churches and massacred worshippers during Christian holy days
have become the new norm, the archbishop and everyone else should expect exactly
that.
**Raymond Ibrahim, author of the new book, Sword and Scimitar, Fourteen
Centuries of War between Islam and the West, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at
the Gatestone Institute and a Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East
Forum.
© 2019 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
European Elections: "The Battle for Europe has Begun"
Soeren Kern/Gatestone Institute/May 02/19
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14168/european-elections-prague
"We are fighting for Europe to remain European, with European values...." —
Tomio Okamura, President, Czech Freedom and Direct Democracy party (SPD) and
Deputy Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies.
"My friends, we are gathered here today to stand up for our freedom and our
sovereignty. The most precious things we have. Because without a strong nation
state, there is no democracy. And without democracy there are no liberties....
My friends, our countries are strong nations. Based on a Jewish-Christian and
humanistic civilization. That should never change. So, we want to control our
own borders again. We do not want mass immigration. And we do not want to be
invaded by a tyrannical ideology." — Geert Wilders, leader of the Dutch Freedom
Party (PVV).
"However, my friends, it isn't easy to leave the EU, as the British have found
out. Despite a majority voting for Brexit, the establishment and the EU have
colluded to stop us." — Janice Atkinson, British MEP, who is also Vice Chair of
the Europe of Nations and Freedom (ENF) political group in the European
Parliament.
"Immigration must be stopped, and the Islamist ideology must be eradicated....
Islamization and globalism are new totalitarianisms that threaten European
countries." — Marine Le Pen, Prague Press Conference.
The leaders of several European nationalist parties campaigned in Prague on
April 25, ahead of the European Parliament elections set for May 23-26.
Pictured: Tomio Okamura (left), president of the Czech Freedom and Direct
Democracy Party, Marine Le Pen (center), leader of France's National Rally, and
Geert Wilders (right), leader of the Dutch Freedom Party. (Photo by Gabriel
Kuchta/Getty Images)
The leaders of several European nationalist parties campaigned in Prague on
April 25, ahead of the European Parliament elections set for May 23-26.
The rally was sponsored by the Movement for a Europe of Nations and Freedom (MENF),
a pan-European alliance of nine nationalist parties dedicated to stopping mass
migration and recovering national sovereignty from the European Union.
The Prague event was organized by the president of the Czech Freedom and Direct
Democracy Party (SPD), Tomio Okamura, who was joined by Dutch Freedom Party (PVV)
leader Geert Wilders, French National Rally (RN) leader Marine Le Pen, the
President of Movement for a Europe of Nations and Freedom (MENF), Gerolf
Annemans, and British MEP Janice Atkinson, who is also Vice Chair of the Europe
of Nations and Freedom (ENF) political group in the European Parliament. Italian
Interior Minister Matteo Salvini, leader of the anti-mass migration League
party, sent a video message. They spoke to a crowd in Prague's downtown
Wenceslas Square. Following are some excerpts of the keynote speeches:
Tomio Okamura, President, Freedom and Direct Democracy party (SPD) and Deputy
Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies:
"Dear friends, dear guests, dear Marine, dear Geert, dear colleagues, I warmly
welcome you here in the historical center of the Czech capital. We stand here
symbolically at the statue of St. Wenceslas. Under the banner of St. Wenceslas,
our ancestors fought more than a thousand years of hard struggle for the freedom
and sovereignty of the Czech crown countries....
"Today, Europeans are once again fighting for their survival. It is not just the
migration of colonists from Africa and the Arab countries that is changing the
face of Western Europe. It is also the growing assault from Brussels on the
sovereignty of Europe's nation states in the name of a multicultural superstate.
"For those who downplay this warning, I would like to mention a quote from the
former President of the European Union, Herman Von Rompuy: 'The time of the
homogenous nation-state is over. Each European country has to be open for
different cultures.'
"In contemporary Europe, the Brussels aristocracy has no place for nations, and
no place for democracy either. The former President of the European Parliament,
Martin Schulz, has been quoted as saying: 'It is not the EU's philosophy that
the crowd can decide its destiny.'
"And for those who are still not sure about Europe's ambitions, German Deputy
Foreign Minister Michael Roth has called for replacing the principle of
unanimity in EU decision-making with qualified majority voting.
"Dear Citizens, the mass immigration of millions of Africans and Muslims to
Europe is no coincidence — it is a targeted liquidation of traditional European
nation states, as well as the targeted destruction of traditional European
values — hence the concept of the traditional family is being liquidated, and
patriotism becomes a rude word, because these values are the biggest obstacle
to the demolition of nation states.
"It is up to us to decide whether we give up all that our ancestors have
sacrificed their lives for, whether we will savor their memory, or defend their
heritage....
"I say clearly that the current EU must end! I remind you that at present,
European Union directives and regulations outrank the laws of the EU's member
states....
"The European Parliament is the only place where we can change Europe. Come to
the polls! Together across Europe we advocate a return to the original model of
European cooperation, without regulation from Brussels, when sovereign nation
states had a common market and free movement of citizens of European nations.
And each state was at the same time a sovereign in its territory, adopting its
own laws and, if necessary, protecting its borders.
"We are fighting for Europe to remain European, with European values....
"Dear citizens, dear friends, we say a clear 'NO' to further restrictions on the
rights of citizens, including the right to own a gun. NO acceptance of Euro
currency by the Czech Republic. NO transferring further power from state to
EU....
"We are not alone. National patriotic parties are on the rise all over Europe,
promoting freedom, democracy and the sovereignty of their peoples.
"We are not alone and together we have a tremendous historic opportunity to win
and change the European Union from the Brussels dictatorship to the Union of
Free European States, which cooperate on the basis of mutual equality and mutual
benefit.
"These elections, if we want, can be a real referendum on the European Union."
Geert Wilders, MP and Chairman, Party for Freedom:
"My friends, we are gathered here today to stand up for our freedom and our
sovereignty. The most precious things we have. Because without a strong nation
state, there is no democracy. And without democracy there are no liberties.
"Today, we are fighting for our existence. And the biggest threats to our
survival and our freedom are the European Union, mass immigration and the
Islamic ideology of submission and violence.
"First, let's talk about the European Union. An undemocratic superstate. It is
forcing its commands on the peoples of Europe. It is trying to take away our
national sovereignty! And we want to be sovereign, don't we?
"The European Union is attempting to erase our nation states. But we say; no
more! Let's say it loud and clear: no more! Our nations are shaped by their own
history, culture, language and identity and therefore they are impossible to
erase!
"My friends, our countries are strong nations. Based on a Jewish-Christian and
humanistic civilization. That should never change.
"So, we want to control our own borders again. We do not want mass immigration.
And we do not want to be invaded by a tyrannical ideology.
"You Czechs are — as a matter of fact — an example to us all. Because you are
opposing the EU asylum policy. You are opposing the Islamization of Europe. You
say: Ne, Nikdy [No, not ever]. Your resistance inspires us!
"Let me tell you something about my country, the Netherlands. A few weeks ago, a
jihadi attack took place in one of our major cities, Utrecht. Four innocent
people were killed in broad daylight in a tram by a jihadist. And in the three
largest cities in the Netherlands, the majority of people under the age of 25
are non-Western immigrants. Mostly Islamic. Our people are already a stranger in
their own town and country. The Netherlands is given away by the elites. On a
silver platter. In many western European countries, it is just like that or even
worse.
"The European Union has been pampering Islam for decades now. But Islam is a
medieval cult that denies freedom to others. So why should we grant Islam any
liberties? We should not, we should stop Islam. By depriving Islam of the means
to destroy our identity, we are not violating freedom; we are preserving our
identity and guaranteeing freedom.
"As we have seen, the free world has been the victim of many terror attacks in
the last few years. From New York, Madrid, Paris, Brussels and Nice to
Barcelona, Manchester, Berlin, Stockholm and Marseille innocent people were
murdered by Islamic inspired terrorists, that hate us and cherish death more
than life. And a few days ago, innocent people died on Easter Sunday in Sri
Lanka, where Christians in churches and westerners in hotels were attacked and
brutally slaughtered. So, Islamization comes with a very high price. One we are
not willing to pay.
"Freedom obviously also has a price and we must be prepared to pay it: a choice
has to be made. The choice between Islam and freedom. There is no middle way.
Because nothing is more precious than liberty and freedom.
"Defending our freedom, defending our way of life, requires all of us to be
vigilant, courageous and audacious. It requires all of us to raise our voice. To
raise our voice against the enemies of freedom. Against the tyranny of
Islamization. Against everyone who tries to silence us!
"The European Union and many governments facilitate Islam and Islamic
immigration. Why are they facilitating a totalitarian ideology? Why are they
accommodating an intolerant dogma? It is as if they have surrendered. It is as
if they have capitulated. But not on behalf of the people. Not on behalf of you.
"We will never apologize for being free men. We will never surrender. We stand
on the shoulders of giants. And there is no stronger power than the force of
free men fighting for the great cause of liberty. Because freedom is the
birthright of all men. And Islam and freedom are incompatible.
"Unless there are radical changes to the present policies towards migration,
over 30% of Sweden will be Islamic by the year 2050. And almost 20% in Germany
and France. And it will only get worse in the next decades, because the
population of Africa is exploding. According to the United Nations, the
population of Africa will grow from one billion people to 4 billion Africans by
the end of this century. Many of them will want to come to Europe. Many of them
will come from Islamic countries. My friends, Europe is on the brink of cultural
suicide.
"The European Union will never defend our national interest and our freedom. So,
we need strong nation states. And we need brave leaders who care about the
freedom and security of their own people. Who are not afraid to speak the truth
about the dangers of mass immigration.
"That is why it is so important to have a huge group of political allies working
together in the next European elections. That's why it is so important that
brave leaders as Marine Le Pen and Matteo Salvini have our support.
"And that's why it is so important to have one of the bravest politicians of all
Europe on our side, a hero who is not afraid to speak the truth about the EU and
Islam: Tomio Okamura!
"My friends, we are the patriots! And we will win! Long live the Czech Republic!
Svoboda! Thank you."
Gerolf Annemans, President, Movement for a Europe of Nations and Freedom (MENF):
"I stand like all of you on this central spot of the continent, not only on the
crossroads of Europe, but also and more than ever we stand at the crossroads of
European history.
"The European Union has become an institution that crushes the peoples of member
states because the big bosses of the European Union want to put their
organization to become the one and only superstate on the continent.
"Our proud nations will become powerless provinces if we let this happen. What
this all means for the future of our children can be seen in the way the
European Union put mass migration in motion on the continent.
"Under EU rules, mass migration became a historic icon of wild migration. We
have to resist this chaos. We are the resistance. Our political family has the
image of Matteo Salvini, who showed as Italian minister that to reverse
migration you need one thing and one thing only, the political will to do so.
Nothing more, but unfortunately, these days, nothing less.
"Putting this political will into the center of politics is our goal.
"I ask you, did the brave Czech people fight for their freedom to become
oppressed by disappearing in the European Union? Did we, did you fight the USSR
to get a similar threat in return? Tell us, yes or no?
"No, of course. We fought, you fought for freedom. We stand for freedom. And in
this historical election of May 2019 the battle for our freedom will be
decisive.
"We are the resistance. Matteo Salvini, Marine Le Pen, Geert Wilders, my party
president Tom Van Grieken of the Flemish party Vlaams Belang, and all the
others, we are proud to have you and Tomio as strong allies in Central Europe of
what will become a force for change in Europe.
"For our homeland and for our freedom, let us join forces and let us stand
strong. No matter how strong our opponents could be, we will be stronger because
we have the strength of our conviction, and we are the hope that the people of
Europe have in us.
"Long live the Europe of nations. Long live the Europe of freedom."
Janice Atkinson, British MEP and Vice President, Europe of Nations and Freedom:
"My message to the Czechs and for the citizens of the EU is to vote for the
parties that will take you out of the EU. It is the evil empire. Vote for the
parties that will tear down the EU state, so that power is returned to the
nations of Europe and freedom.
"The EU is the dictatorship of the unelected, the failed politicians of their
own nations, as they suck the lifeblood of democracy out of our countries. These
unelected dictators have imposed mass uncontrolled immigration on our countries.
They have failed to secure our external borders. They have failed to stop
migrants arriving by foot, by boats and via people smugglers.
"The Schengen system allows them to walk freely, to live and work where they
choose — even though it is not what we choose. They have unleashed terror on our
streets. They have the rape and sexual assault of women on their hands. They
have Europe's blood on their hands.
"They have changed our cities and our streets and towns so that they are
unrecognizable, and we are foreigners in our own lands. They encourage radical
Islam, which has brought into our lives Sharia law, female genital mutilation,
child marriage and medieval clothing such as the burka. Enough. No more!
"Do not accept that this is Europe's fate. It is reversible and can be stopped.
If you value your freedoms, your way of life, your rule of law, your culture and
heritage, the EU has to be stopped. The only way to do this is to vote for Tomio
Okamura and his party, the SPD. Tomio, together with my colleagues, Geert
Wilders, Marine Le Pen and Matteo Salvini can change the course of Europe.
"The SPD will also give you the freedom for Czexit, a referendum on whether you
want to stay in the EU. I hope you follow the British and vote to leave.
However, my friends, it isn't easy to leave the EU, as the British have found
out. Despite a majority voting for Brexit, the establishment and the EU have
colluded to stop us. And that's the trouble. We have elected MEPs and MPs who
have given control of our lives and our countries and our day to day life and
our future to the people who do not believe in the nation state, sovereignty and
control over our own laws.
"In these EU elections, you have the change to save the Czech Republic and to
save Europe. Do you want to be robbed by unelected bureaucrats such as
Jean-Claude Juncker, Frans Timmermans or Donald Tusk? No!
"My friends, we are at a tipping point in Europe. You can save our continent."
Marine Le Pen, President, National Rally:
"The battle for Europe has begun. In these elections, the supporters of
globalism stand against supporters of the nation state. The globalists against
the localists.
"European federalists support total deregulation, the complete abolition of
borders, the free movement of migration across the planet and the weakening of
nation states for the benefit of oligarchs, civil servants and experts. On the
other hand, there are us patriots from all across Europe.
"We have chosen our nations, nations whose diversity is the richness of Europe.
They must remain themselves and cooperate freely with each other....
"We do not want to seal the borders, but we want to put the doors back to our
home....
"My country offers a sad example of migratory submersion. If you are not
careful, it will be your future. Whole neighborhoods have become non-French
areas!....
"The democratic push of the patriots in all the countries of Europe will make it
possible to recast the European framework....
"Today, the European Union does not have the capacity to send tanks on the
streets or to fire on the crowd... Yet the goal is the same: to reduce our
political, legal, and national identity — our capacities of resistance....
"We, the French and the Czechs, will be at the rendezvous of history on May 26!
Long live the Czech people! Long live the French people! Long live the Europe of
sovereign nations!"
During a press conference, Le Pen added:
"What we see here, before our eyes, is the emergence of a new European harmony
that sees the national parties coming together to offer 500 million Europeans a
new framework of cooperation, a new project and a new momentum for the future.
"Immigration must be stopped, and the Islamist ideology must be eradicated....
Islamization and globalism are new totalitarianisms that threaten European
countries."
In a video broadcast at the Prague event, Italian Interior Minister Matteo
Salvini said:
"Ladies and gentlemen, I am sending a greeting to my friend Tomio Okamura and
the Czech friends at the SPD. I hope, and in fact I'm sure that after May 26,
after the European elections, we will finally be working together in a new
Europe that defends borders and our children against immigration and Islamic
extremism, which must be stopped."
Salvini is trying to unite nationalist parties scattered across the 28-nation
European Union to join forces in a new political alliance. On April 8, Salvini
was joined in Milan by representatives of Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD)
party, the Danish People's Party and the Finns Party, to launch a new alliance
called "Towards a Common Sense Europe." Salvini hopes that the new bloc will
emerge as the largest in the 751-member parliament after the elections in May.
*Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute.
© 2019 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Jordanian Journalist: Israel's Leaders Are Implementing
'The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion' In Full
MEMRI/May 02/2019
In a February 7, 2019 article in the Jordanian t daily Al-Dustour, 'Awwad Al-Saqr
wrote that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, written by the leaders of the
Zionist Movement, set out strategic plans for taking over the world which Israel
has been implementing by spreading chaos, wars and corruption and presenting any
criticism it as antisemitism. He added that this is only the tip of the iceberg,
and what is unknown about the Protocols is even graver and more dangerous.
The following are excerpts from his article:
Cover of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in Arabic translation (image:
arabjo.net, October 2, 2018)
"Israel was founded on the soil of historic Palestine at a time when we were
unmindful of our interests. The leaders of the Zionist Movement planned to
attain this goal in full ever since they held their first World Zionist Congress
in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897, presided over by Theodor Herzl, the founder of
the abominable Zionist Movement. The ideologues [of this movement] formulated
strategic plans for taking over the world politically, economically,
ideologically and by means of the media, and called this plan The Protocols of
the Elders of Zion. Since then, the leaders of Israel have been following [these
Protocols] and implementing them in full. I saw a need to present these satanic
Protocols so that we, [both] leaders and citizens, draw lessons and realize the
depth of our Zionist enemies' cunning and hostility and [the scope of] their
plots.
"The plan comprises 23 Protocols focusing on the spreading of chaos, war and
internal unrest in the world, and justify every kind of crime against non-Jews,
whom they call goyim, meaning 'the nations.'[1] They have rulings by rabbis
[permitting them] to commit every kind of crime, abomination and sin in order to
attain these goals... The Protocols also deal with the takeover of education and
the media, because education instills certain perceptions and values in future
generations, and the press shapes and directs [public] opinion. In addition,
these abominable Protocols focus on spreading bribery and corruption in society,
just as they strive to spread religious, tribal and sectarian fanaticism and sow
hostility and enmity between neighboring countries, so that hostility will
persist and unity will not prevail. Another [goal] on which the Protocols focus
is corrupting morals, [planting] agents, presenting the Jews as persecuted, and
presenting any resistance or even criticism of Israel as stemming from
antisemitism. They also focus on distracting people using every form of worldly
pleasure, entertainment and sport so as to occupy the masses in their free time
with matters that are far from politics. One of the important goals [set out] in
the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is drowning countries in foreign debt so
they will not be able to recover and will remain shackled to international funds
until their citizens lose faith in their governments.
"Everything stated above about the abominable Protocols is just the tip of the
iceberg, and their hidden [parts] are far graver and more terrible and harsh. Is
it not time for us to draw lessons, even if we are very late [in doing so]?
'Better late than never,' as the saying goes. The Jews have been known
throughout history for foot-dragging and argumentativeness for its own sake,
even [when dealing] with prophets and divine messengers, for they said to the
prophet Moses, 'We will not believe you until we see God plainly with our own
eyes' [Quran 2:55]. The story of Moses's argument with the Jews is well-known:
he asked them to slaughter a cow as a sacrifice to Allah after He saved them
from Pharaoh, and they pelted him with pointless questions... 'and then they
slaughtered it, but they could hardly do it' [Quran 2:71]. In other words, they
eventually [slaughtered the cow], but only after much hesitation and not from
inner conviction. This means that they have a natural tendency to argue and set
impossible terms. [If this is how they treat prophets,] how should they treat
[ordinary] human beings? We have no recourse but to trust in God."[2]
[1] The Arabic word used is al-ummiyyoun, which appears in the Quran and was
apparently used by the Jews of Arabia during the Prophet's time to refer to
non-Jewish Arabs.
[2] Al-Dustour (Jordan), February 7, 2019.
Analysis/Muslim Brotherhood: Terrorist Group or Political Movement?
تسفي بارئيل/هآرتس: هل الإخوان المسلمين حركة سياسية أم مجموعة إرهابية؟
Zvi Bar'el/Haatrz/May 02/19
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/74439/%D8%AA%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A6%D9%8A%D9%84-%D9%87%D8%A2%D8%B1%D8%AA%D8%B3-%D9%87%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%86/
President Trump seeks terrorist-organization status for the 90-year-old Muslim
missionary movement, which for decades has renounced violence
Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah al-Sissi had a “small” favor to ask of U.S.
President Donald Trump when they met for an intimate chat on April 9: to
designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. Trump, who views
Sissi as a key ally mainly because of Egypt’s close military cooperation with
Israel and despite its concurrent flirtation with Russia, directed his national
security adviser John Bolton to smile on Sissi’s request and find a way to
impose sanctions on the Islamist political movement.
What is the Muslim Brotherhood?
The movement was established in 1928 in the Egyptian city of Ismailia by Hassan
al-Banna, then a 24-year-old imam, who disseminated his principles in a series
of pamphlets that were distributed to university students, in mosques and at
clubs. Banna recognized the importance of participating in politics and using it
to leverage the movement’s power and to promote its ideology of establishing a
state that operated in accordance with religious law.
Political cooperation forced Banna to adopt Arab nationalism and the fight
against colonial occupation in Egypt (and in all Arab states), which was both a
local and a supranational struggle. Banna understood his movement’s main concern
to be the local struggle, in a bid to bolster his public support at a time when
Egypt was engaged in a battle over its identity.
This approach contradicted the movement’s core ideology, which saw nationalism
as competing with the universality of Islam and with the idea of establishing a
united Muslim nation, but this is where Banna’s pragmatism came into play. As he
explained to his followers, “the circumstances” dictated operating with
political astuteness and the political game was only a means to an end.
The Muslim Brotherhood is headed by the supreme guide, who oversees the
secretary general and the Executive Office. District branches are funded by
subdistrict and neighborhood branches. The principle guiding the group’s
operations is religious teaching based on welfare activities, medical care and
mutual aid to create loyalty to and dependence on the movement. The Muslim
Brotherhood has branches in several Muslim countries. In some of these, such as
Jordan and Tunisia, it has established political parties.
In Egypt itself the organization’s activities have been banned since 1954, but
it has circumvented the prohibition by running independent candidates who, after
winning parliamentary election, founded political factions that answered to the
supreme guide. Egypt’s presidents, from Gamal Abdel Nasser to Anwar Sadat (who
was presumably a member of the movement) to Hosni Mubarak, sought the support of
the Muslim Brotherhood. These efforts failed, however, and were replaced by
violent oppression of the movement’s leaders and members.
The Muslim Brotherhood and the Arab Spring
The organization’s younger activists, in particular, maintained close ties with
leftist activists and some protest movements even before the Arab Spring broke
out in 2011. In the early stages of the revolution the Brotherhood sat on the
fence, even voicing support for Mubarak, but it went on to attempt to wrest
control of the demonstrations. The organization eventually won the imprimatur of
the revolutionary movements, which after Mubarak’s ouster successfully pressed
for the Brotherhood’s legalization.
In the 2011 parliamentary election that followed the fall of Mubarak, the
organization ran together with a number of secular protest movements and secured
nearly half of the seats in parliament. In the 2012 presidential election,
Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohammed Morsi won. The legislature, despite having
been elected democratically, was dissolved after the country’s constitutional
court found irregularities in the election process. Morsi remained in power,
however, promising to honor all the agreements signed by previous governments,
including the Camp David Accords.
But the authoritarian conduct of Morsi, who he also began issuing presidential
decrees expanding his powers, led to the recognition that he meant to pursue a
rigid religious agenda and spurred new demonstrations from opposition groups
that failed in the election. These eventually led to his ouster by Sissi, his
own military chief of staff and defense minister.
The Brotherhood and Sissi
Morsi’s violent fight against the Muslim Brotherhood and its designation as a
terrorist organization stemmed mainly from apprehension over its public support;
its political power, accrued over decades; and its status as the country’s most
highly organized political movement, with a finger in every pie. In the course
of this fight, dozens of the Brotherhood’s activists and leaders were killed and
thousands were arrested; many of these were sentenced to death. Sissi succeeded
in framing the movement as a terrorist organization that cooperated with
Al-Qaida and other terrorist organizations operating in Sinai. He used
state-controlled media outlets to sway the public conversation against it and he
confiscated the movement’s assets. Sissi also convinced Saudi Arabia to
designate the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, in exchange for agreeing
to join the Arab coalition Riyadh was putting together for the war in Yemen.
Involvement in terror
Successive generations of Muslim Brotherhood leaders have declared its
condemnation of terror actions and foundations as a religious and political
organization. This stance led some activists to quit its ranks and to establish
their terrorist organizations or to join existing ones.
In 1940, the Brotherhood created a quasi-military “secret apparatus” to fight
the British occupation and any colonialist occupation of an Arab nation. Nasser,
then a young commissioned officer, belonged to the group.
After Banna’s assassination, in February 1949, the group was disbanded by his
successor and its members were absorbed into the Brotherhood’s administrative
activities. There is no evidence that the organization has engaged in terrorist
activities in or beyond Egypt for several decades. Descendants of the movement,
however, such as Hamas in the territories and terrorist organizations in various
Muslim countries, have adopted terror as a mode of operation, based on an
independent interpretation of the teachings of Banna and of Sayyid Qutb, a
prominent Muslim thinker and Brotherhood member who was executed in 1966 for
plotting Nasser’s assassination.
Designation as a terrorist organization
Trump cannot designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization by
fiat. U.S. intelligence organizations must first gather evidence of the
organization’s involvement in terrorist activities that threatens the United
States or its interests and present it to the secretary of state, who must
consult with the attorney general and the treasury secretary before making the
designation. After Congress is notified of the secretary’s intent, the Senate
and the U.S. House of Representatives is given seven days to review the evidence
and to block the designation or let it stand. If the designation is approved,
the Muslim Brotherhood would have 30 days to appeal to a federal court in
Washington.
Beyond the legal difficulty, the designation is liable to have implications for
U.S. relations with states such as Turkey and Qatar which support the
organization on both the religious and the political levels.
The fight against terrorism will not be won quickly
Sir John Jenkins/Arab News/May 02/19
We have had quite a time of it on the terror front recently, haven’t we? To take
the example of just one group, Daesh’s last stand at Baghouz in Syria, its
inspiring of attacks on security targets in Congo and Saudi Arabia and on
Christians in Sri Lanka, and now, linking them all, the pre-Ramadan reappearance
of Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi (who has clearly not been overdoing the diet during his
time underground) have all followed in quick and sometimes bewildering
succession. In Iraq and Syria, even after the loss of territory, Daesh never
stopped seeking to regularly strike its enemies — just like it and its
predecessors did after 2003.
Over the last six months or so, we have also seen white right-wing extremist
attacks on synagogues in Pittsburgh and San Diego and on a mosque in New Zealand
— part of a trend that has been building for some years. Some people say that is
the real wave of the future, fueled by growing social, cultural and economic
anomie in the heartlands of the West. Others say that is nonsense and that the
big threat remains the exploitation of under-governed spaces in the Middle East,
North Africa, the Pakistani-Afghan borders and Southeast Asia by violent,
millenarian and transnational Islamist groups intent not just on overthrowing
regional governments but remaking the global order. They are prepared to fight
“until doomsday,” as Al-Baghdadi has again made clear for the slower learners
among us.
Only in February, Donald Trump proclaimed that Daesh had been eliminated, in an
echo of Barack Obama’s presumptuous description of them as a junior varsity
team, and — in a different context — George W. Bush’s equally vainglorious claim
of “Mission Accomplished” in Iraq. Yet we know that the group has managed to
retain significant accumulated wealth from its time controlling territory and
the allegiance of a core group of foreign fighters, perhaps as many as 30,000.
And here they are again, popping up like a bad jinni to tell us that they never
really meant to establish a territorial base simply in Syria or Iraq, that they
have instead created wilayats all over the world, and in any case continue to
colonize more important territory — the minds and hearts of the impressionable
and discontented.
Meanwhile, in Idlib, the Al-Qaeda-connected groups, Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham and its
dissident offshoot, Hurras Al-Din, seem to have consolidated their authority
through the violent suppression of other groups and are digging in against
pressure from the Syrian regime and its backers. Al-Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula has once more shown its resilience and adaptability in the mess that
is Yemen. In Somalia, Al-Shabab has not gone away, nor has Boko Haram in West
Africa. In Iran, there are reports of increasing activity by violent separatist
groups in the southeast, and some stirrings in the Kurdish regions.
And, in all this excitement, we should not forget the increasingly coordinated
activities of Iran, its armed proxies in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon and its agents
of influence across the world, from Caracas to Canberra. Turkey, of course,
accuses anybody with links to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party of terrorism. Even in
Northern Ireland, we have seen attempts by revanchist former members of the
Provisional IRA to fan the flames of sectarian violence, even if they only
manage to murder young journalists.
The stated ambitions of Daesh, Al-Qaeda and many right-wing extremists may be
ludicrous. But they take them very seriously.
Sir John Jenkins
If you actually look at measurements like those of the Global Terrorism Index,
you will find that the cumulative total of victims has actually declined over
recent years. But that is misleading. These indices measure all victims, and
most of them are found in areas where armed conflict has broken out, or is
endemic. So Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen have accounted
for the vast majority of terror casualties over the last 15 years or so. When
conflict dies down, as it undoubtedly has in Iraq and to an extent in Syria,
then the numbers go down. But the underlying causes — social, cultural, economic
and political — on which terror feeds have not disappeared. And this gives an
opportunity for the highly organized, motivated and ideologically committed
groups that commit or sponsor most terror attacks to thrive. They also create a
response; by design.
Just as in Iraq after 2003, attacks by the precursors of Al-Qaeda in Iraq and
Daesh produced an equally brutal response by armed Shiite groups, often
sponsored by Iran, so attacks on the West by Al-Qaeda and Daesh — and the
consequences of the disorder they have created in parts of North Africa and the
Levant — have given oxygen to far-right extremists. And there will always be
causes that such groups can use to claim victimhood and therefore the right to
retaliation. If it’s not the Great Mosque at Samarra, it’s the Rohingya in
Myanmar, the Sayyidah Zaynab in Damascus, Al-Aqsa Mosque, the Uighurs, or the
Field of Blackbirds in the Balkans. These are fitted into a reductionist and
violent narrative of victimhood, a subset of the wider identity politics that
are reshaping political systems across the world.
And this retreat into a new tribalism is the real danger. To join a sect is to
claim privileged victim status. It is to define the political community as the
righteous and the just and everyone else as “The Other” and, therefore, “The
Enemy;” something Islamists and Western right-wing nationalists have in common
with each other, along with Sayyid Qutb, the theorist of the modern Jahiliyyah,
Carl Schmitt, the Nazi jurist of the state of exception, and a range of
millenarian and obscurantist lunatics through the ages.
In 2015, shortly after I left the British diplomatic service, I was interviewed
by the BBC. They asked me what I thought the future was for Daesh and similar
groups. I said that they certainly needed to be physically defeated in Iraq and
Syria, which some disputed at the time. But you can’t defeat an ideology with
bullets. The ideology of Islamism — and all Islamisms have a doctrine of
physical force, no matter what their advocates might claim — was already a
century old. There were no signs that it was losing its power to attract
adherents. And it had already provoked a response in those it targeted. It was a
dialectic of separation, of hate and counter-hate. The consequences would be
with us for the rest of my lifetime and well beyond. I was surprised when the
interviewer queried this. It was hardly a new observation after all.
Now no one really questions it. But perhaps a better way to think about what is
happening is not so much about terror and non-terror — both terms that are
notoriously hard to define, even more so in an age of asymmetric conflict and
deniable aggression — but about what we most value in our current political,
social and economic dispensations and what are the most serious threats to them
from all sources. That way we can plan more rationally and collectively to
combat these threats across the board. Some of them come from violent terrorist
groups, some from their state sponsors, some simply from states — little green
men, deniable cyberattacks, the covert shaping of opinion or simply fake news —
some from within our own societies, from our own reactions or over-reactions,
amplified by social media and the sheer speed of global communication networks.
The stated ambitions of Daesh, Al-Qaeda and many right-wing extremists — like
those of some states who also overestimate their power — may be ludicrous. But
they take them very seriously and are prepared to inflict enormous damage in the
process of proving that they are impossible to achieve. We must therefore be
prepared for the long haul. That means accepting that this is a struggle for
collective security. That can only succeed if it is based on genuinely ethical
national resilience, applied intelligence (in all its various senses), the
technological competence to stay ahead of the opposition (for example in cyber,
remote or drone technologies), a willingness to trust in cooperation and, above
all, sustained political purpose and a sense of proportion. We’re in this
together — for the long haul.
*Sir John Jenkins is an Associate at Policy Exchange. Until December 2017, he
was Corresponding Director (Middle East) at the International Institute for
Strategic Studies (IISS), based in Manama, Bahrain, and was a Senior Fellow at
Yale University’s Jackson Institute for Global Affairs. He was the British
ambassador to Saudi Arabia until January 2015.
Iranian regime using foreign prisoners as political pawns
د. ماجد رافيزادا : النظام الإيراني يستعمل الأسرى الأجانب كأحجار شطرنج
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab News/May 02/19
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/74445/%d8%af-%d9%85%d8%a7%d8%ac%d8%af-%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%b2%d8%a7%d8%af%d8%a7-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%86%d8%b8%d8%a7%d9%85-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d9%8a%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%8a-%d9%8a%d8%b3%d8%aa%d8%b9%d9%85/
Since the Iranian revolution in 1979, the Islamic Republic has generally
resorted to backchannels in order to negotiate deals with foreign governments
whose citizens it holds as prisoners. But, in an unprecedented move, during a
recent interview at the Asia Society in New York, Foreign Minister Mohammed
Javad Zarif made a public offer to the US and other countries regarding American
and European citizens held in Iranian jails.
Zarif made a bold statement, saying: “I put this offer on the table, publicly,
now. Exchange them. All these people that are in prison inside the United
States, on extradition request from the United States… Let us exchange them.” He
then acknowledged the authority that he enjoys, saying: “I have the authority to
do that. We informed the government of the United States six months ago that we
are ready.”
First of all, it must be noted that Zarif’s statement contains a critical
inaccuracy. Being part of the executive branch, neither Iran’s foreign minister
nor President Hassan Rouhani have the power to make such offers to foreign
governments. These matters are under the control and authority of the hardline
judiciary system. The head of the judiciary, also known as the chief justice of
Iran, is directly appointed by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. In other words, the
judiciary system also requires Khamenei’s blessing to make decisions about
foreign prisoners and hostages.
In fact, it is intriguing that Zarif contradicted himself by admitting this.
When the foreign minister was questioned about the conditions and potential
release of a group of environmental scientists held by Iran, he replied: “This
is not my job. Our judiciary is independent. I have not agreed with the
accusations against them, but I am busy enough preventing wars and economic
pressures.”
This begs the question of how Zarif seemingly has the authority to release some
prisoners but not others. The eight environmentalists, who were arrested more
than a year ago, are still in detention accused of crimes such as “spreading
corruption on Earth.” One of them, the Iranian-Canadian Kavous Seyyed-Emami,
died in suspicious circumstances while in jail. Without providing any valid
proof, Iran’s judiciary announced that he had committed suicide because of the
evidence of spying against him. The Iranian regime has regularly framed sudden
deaths in its prisons, or through interrogations, as “suicides.”
Despite pressure from human rights organizations, Iran declines to release the
environmental scientists. Several Members of the European Parliament from a wide
range of political parties wrote a letter to Rouhani stating: “We understand
that the Iranian judiciary has accused the activists of using environmental
projects as a cover to collect classified strategic information, but a committee
established under your authority has found no evidence of these allegations.”
But Iran has not yet responded.
Under the presidency of the so-called moderate Rouhani, travel warnings issued
by other countries to their citizens have increased
Another foreign citizen held in Iran’s notorious Evin Prison is the
British-Iranian dual national Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, who worked for the
Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of the news agency. Others
detained in Iran’s political prison include US Navy veteran Michael White, Xiyue
Wang — an American citizen and graduate student at Princeton University who was
sentenced to 10 years in prison on the charge of spying — and Iranian-Americans
Karan Vafadari and his wife Afarin Neyssari, and Baquer and Siamak Namazi.
Under the presidency of the so-called moderate Rouhani, travel warnings issued
by other countries to their citizens have increased. For example, the British
Foreign Office recently warned all UK-Iranian dual nationals not to travel to
Iran. Its statement declared: “There is a risk that British nationals, and a
higher risk that British/Iranian dual nationals, could be arbitrarily detained
in Iran. All British nationals should consider carefully the risks of traveling
to Iran.”
While Iran’s foreign minister does not wield power when it comes to releasing or
exchanging prisoners, there is a possibility that he is being instructed by one
of the hardline organizations — the judiciary system, the Ministry of
Intelligence, the senior cadre of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or the
Office of the Supreme Leader — to carry out this mission. In other words, he is
acting as the hardliners’ puppet to advance their parochial and political
interests.
The Islamic Republic has frequently utilized hostages as political pawns and
leverage against other governments. This has been the policy of the theocratic
establishment since the revolution in 1979, starting with the takeover that year
of the US Embassy in Tehran, which led to 52 Americans being held hostage for
444 days. The regime released them only when it had achieved its political,
economic and ideological objectives.
In a nutshell, the Iranian regime is once again using foreign citizens as
hostages in order to blackmail other governments. It is incumbent on these
countries not to submit to Tehran’s hostage-taking game. Accepting Iran’s terms
will only embolden and empower the regime.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist.
He is a leading expert on Iran and US foreign policy, a businessman and
president of the International American Council. Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh
The trials and tribulations of Carlos Ghosn in the Japanese justice system
Ahmad Elhusseini/Al Arabiya/May 02/2019
Carlos Ghosn’s painful journey through the Japanese criminal justice system has
been very much in the news. Ghosn, for many years a senior executive at both
Renault and Nissan and a highly-regarded automobile industry leader, has
suffered a precipitous fall from grace. He has been arrested twice by Japanese
authorities – first, in November 2018, and again in April 2019 – and released on
bail, after spending a considerable amount of time in pre-trial detention.
He has been charged with four sets of offenses under Japanese law, including
alleged understatements of his compensation from Nissan and a failure to pay
taxes on this compensation, as well as abuse of corporate authority whilst at
Nissan. This was followed by allegations that he improperly diverted corporate
resources to certain of Nissan’s corporate partners, in particular an Omani
distributor of Nissan vehicles. Additional charges cover Ghosn’s alleged misuse
of Nissan and Renault corporate resources to pay for his personal, rather than
business-related, expenses, including dining, luxury goods, travel, and the
purchase and refurbishment of residences.
The western media has covered various unusual aspects of the Ghosn saga, many of
which stem from the remarkable harshness of the Japanese criminal justice
system. These include such things as multi-hour/multi-day custodial
interrogations of Ghosn by Japanese prosecutors without the presence of his
lawyers, the seizure, during the April 4 search of his apartment in Tokyo, of
his communications with his legal team, and the agreement, secured as a
condition of his release from the second detention, that he would not meet with
his wife without obtaining consent from Japanese courts.
While these are all concerning by western due process standards, there are even
more troubling aspects of the Ghosn affair. Based upon Wall Street Journal
reporting, it appears that Ghosn’s downfall was brought about by a combination
of governmental and corporate intrigues, whatever his personal misgivings.
For many years, Ghosn had kept the Renault-Nissan alliance in a form that
respected Japanese cultural and corporate sensitivities, and accorded
substantial corporate independence to Nissan. Unfortunately, once President
Emmanuel Macron took office, the French government began to press aggressively
for a full and formal merger of Nissan with the French carmaker. The French
government’s marching orders to Ghosn were to create a detailed merger roadmap
to achieve this end by June 15, 2018. Ghosn succumbed to that pressure and began
to pursue the path of a Renault-Nissan merger.
This development prompted first consternation, followed by anger, both among
Nissan’s senior Japanese corporate executives, including several of Ghosn’s
senior subordinates such as Hiroto Saikawa, Hari Nada, and Hitoshi Kawaguchi,
and among senior officials at the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade, and
Industry. The initial investigation of Ghosn arose out of this joint discontent
and desire to stop the merger process, which Nissan’s executives have
enthusiastically supported and assisted Japanese law enforcement authorities
with.
The Wall Street Journal’s revelations about the governmental and corporate
machinations that led to Ghosn’s downfall have not been denied either by the
Japanese government or Nissan. Indeed, Ghosn’s successor at Nissan, Hiroto
Saikawa, candidly described the whole sordid back story to Renault’s chairman,
Jean-Dominique Senard, during a January 2019 meeting in Amsterdam. Japan’s
official position is that the charges against Ghosn should be judged on their
intrinsic merit and that the investigation’s genesis is irrelevant.
This position, however, is untenable as a matter of due process and actually
further damages the Japanese government’s reputation. Ensuring impartiality
throughout all stages of the investigative process, particularly when it comes
to dealing with complex and nuanced matters of corporate governance, tax, and
accounting, is of utmost importance. The Japanese government, on the other hand,
was anxious to derail the prospects of a Renault-Nissan merger and keen to get
rid of its perceived principal architect, Ghosn. The Japanese law enforcement
authorities were clearly not objective and showed no shortage of interest either
in commencing the investigation or in driving it forward.
In most western countries, particularly in the United States, such evidence of
bias and ulterior motives on the part of investigators and prosecutors
essentially dooms the prospects of conviction. American courts have used the
so-called “shock the conscience” doctrine to explain why charges against
defendants, no matter what their intrinsic merits might be, cannot be maintained
in these circumstances. The government officials involved are also often
disciplined and reprimanded. The fact that the Japanese authorities appear to be
blissfully unaware of these legal and institutional imperatives is troubling.
Furthermore, the French government would be well advised not to accept the
Japanese version of the Game of Thrones and rise to Ghosn’s defense.