English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For April 14/2020
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews19/english.april14.20.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006

Bible Quotations For today
The Third Time That Jesus Appeared To The Disciples After His
Mark 16/09-20/When Jesus rose early on the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had driven seven demons. She went and told those who had been with him and who were mourning and weeping. When they heard that Jesus was alive and that she had seen him, they did not believe it. Afterward Jesus appeared in a different form to two of them while they were walking in the country. These returned and reported it to the rest; but they did not believe them either. Later Jesus appeared to the Eleven as they were eating; he rebuked them for their lack of faith and their stubborn refusal to believe those who had seen him after he had risen. He said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well.”After the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, he was taken up into heaven and he sat at the right hand of God. Then the disciples went out and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed his word by the signs that accompanied it.

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on April 13-14/2020
Hariri Hospital: We have 28 cases, 3 in critical condition
80 Recoveries, 632 Coronavirus Cases in Lebanon
2 new coronavirus cases registered in Lebanon
Bcharre Hospital: Four new cases in the province, one in Chekka, hospital staff test results came out negative
Hassan from Bahman Hospital: There is no financial impediment towards preserving citizens’ health
Araji after a tour of the airport: There is a possibility to renew the process of transferring the Lebanese and opening Beirut airport
UNIFIL grant to Jaba Amel Municipalities Union to confront Corona
Arrival of MEA flight from Jeddah with 126 passengers on board
New Batch of Expats to Arrive in Beirut
Report: PM Meets Political Aide to Speaker on ‘Haircut’ Draft Law
Israel Fires Flare Bombs over Shebaa Outskirts
Lebanon: Food Imports Threatened by Coronavirus, USD Shortage
Rahi during Monday Easter Mass dedicated to France: We are called to be witnesses to resurrection in our way of life
Lebanese Army to start distributing aids on Tuesday
Diaspora Businessmen Council: We place our potentials and capabilities to provide assistance when needed
Druze Sheikh Aql contacts President of the Republic, spiritual figures on Easter

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on April 13-14/2020
Pompeo: US welcomes apparent consensus on forming a government in Iraq
US oil sanctions against Iran are unjust, says Rouhani
Coronavirus: US passes half a million cases as Trump threatens to cut WHO funding
Coronavirus: Iran prepares 10,000 graves in Tehran for victims
Khamenei representative attacks UNICEF, says UN children’s agency US ‘servant’
Coronavirus: Iran COVID-19 cases up to 73,303, death toll increases to 4,585
Three Turkish prisoners die of coronavirus, says Justice Minister
Turkey Confirms Providing Israel with Medical Supplies in Virus Fight
Hamas Says No Progress Made in Prisoner Deal with Israel
Gantz urges Netanyahu to rise to the emergency and share power
Chairman of UAE Banking Federation: COVID-19 Will Change Economic Life, Everyone Must Adapt
Cautious Hope for Pandemic Peak as Spain Readies to Reopen Some Factories
Erdogan Refuses Minister's Resignation over Turkey Lockdown Chaos
Virus 'Disaster in the Making' in War-Torn Syria
Millions Watch Andrea Bocelli Sing in Empty Milan Cathedral

Titles For The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on April 13-14/2020
Pandemic Exposes the Paranoid Style of Iran’s Supreme Leader/Tzvi Kahn/FDD/April 13/2020
Iran's Military Likely Can't Fight Thanks to Coronavirus/Michael Rubin/The National Interest/April 13/2020
Al-Kadhimi must steer Iraq away from US-Iran tensions/Osama Al-Sharif/Arab News/April 13/2020
Virus has potential positive effect on foreign policy/Maria Maalouf/Arab News/April 13/2020
Global unity key to tackling the coronavirus pandemic/Dr. Mohammed Al-Sulami/Arab News/April 13/2020
‘Useful idiots’ damaging search for truth in Syria/Chris Doyle/Arab News/April 13/2020
Russia-Saudi ties will only be stronger after the pandemic/Kirill Dmitriev/Arab News/April 13/2020
Coronavirus Should Finally Smash the Barriers to Telemedicine/Virginia Postrel/Bloomberg/Monday, 13 April, 2020
British Conservatives are Shifting Further to the Right/Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al Awsat/April 13/2020
IMF Must Not Buy the Mullahs' Coronavirus Lies/Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/April 13, 2020
Coronavirus: A French Disaster/Guy Millière/Gatestone Institute/April 13, 2020

The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published 
on April 13-14/2020
Hariri Hospital: We have 28 cases, 3 in critical condition
NNA/April 13/2020
Rafik Hariri University Hospital indicated on Monday in its daily report on the latest developments about the Corona Covid-19 virus, that the total number of laboratory-confirmed cases of infected patients currently present in the hospital's health isolation area has reached 28 cases, adding that the total number of cases that have been fully cured from the virus to-date remains 80. "According to the directions of the World Health Organization and the Ministry of Public Health, one case infected with the Coronavirus was released from the hospital to be home quarantined, after the attending physician confirmed the patient’s clinical recovery, and informed him of all measures and instructions related to domestic isolation,” the Hospital statement added. It also stressed that all those infected with the virus "are receiving the necessary care in the isolation unit and their condition is stable, except for 3 cases who are in critical condition."
In conclusion, the Hospital indicated that more information about the number of infected cases on all Lebanese territories can be found in the daily report issued by the Ministry of Public Health.

80 Recoveries, 632 Coronavirus Cases in Lebanon
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/April 13/2020
The Health Ministry said on Monday that the total tally of individuals infected with coronavirus rose to 632 cases. It said two individuals have tested positive for the virus, while the number of deaths remains at 20. Recoveries rose on Monday bringing the tally to 80 cured. Meanwhile, Health Minister Hamad Hassan assured that financial obstacles will not prevent the ministry from providing the needed healthcare for Lebanese. Hamad comments came during a visit on Monday to the Bahman Hospital, accompanied by Minister of Industry Imad Hoballah, and in the presence of MPs Amine Cherri, Ali Ammar and Fadi Alameh.

2 new coronavirus cases registered in Lebanon
Annahar Staff/Annahar/April 13/2020
The state of general mobilization remains extended until April 26 to further minimize the spread of the virus. BEIRUT: The Ministry of Health confirmed the recording of only two new coronavirus cases in Lebanon, raising the tally of COVID-19 patients to 632. In the past 24 hours, 256 tests were administered, of which only two came back positive. The number of new cases registered on Monday has been the lowest in over a month. So far, the virus has led to the death of 20 people in Lebanon. Of the total count, 80 have recovered while 34 are in critical condition. Additionally, 2014 have been placed under quarantine, according to the Health Ministry. The state of general mobilization remains extended until April 26 to further minimize the spread of the virus. On Monday, four planes are said to arrive at the Beirut International Airport, repatriating Lebanese from Jeddah, Paris, Libreville and London.

Bcharre Hospital: Four new cases in the province, one in Chekka, hospital staff test results came out negative
NNA/Monday/April 13/2020
The Bcharre Governmental Hospital administration announced, in a statement on Monday, the release of the 123 PCR examination results that were conducted on Saturday, which turned out as follows: three new infected cases in Becharre, a new case in Barhalioun and another one in Chekka. “Hence, the total number of positive cases in the province of Bcharre so far is 64 positive cases, including one recovery,” the statement indicated. The Hospital added that the test results of its medical staff at its isolation center came out negative.

Hassan from Bahman Hospital: There is no financial impediment towards preserving citizens’ health
NNA/Monday/April 13/2020
Public Health Minister, Hamad Hassan, stressed Monday that "there is no financial barrier in the face of maintaining the citizen’s health," adding, “Our responsibility as a whole is to guarantee the safety of the nation and the health of its citizens." Hassan emphasized that "restoring confidence in the state lies in mutual cooperation and integration among each other, without any consideration for any political calculations." The Minister’s words came in a press conference he held following a tour in the various sections of Bahman Hospital in Beirut’s southern suburb region, which he inspected at noon today and inaugurated its medical center for treating Corona patients, in the presence of the Minister of Industry Imad Haballah and Deputies Ali Ammar, Amin Sherri, and Fadi Alamah, as well as the Director of Bahman Hospital Ali Karim, and the Hospital’s administrative staff.
Hassan commended the medical center for being equipped on a high degree of responsibility and professionalism, and praised its well-planning and proper implementation on a scientific, health and professional basis.
The Health Minister also paid tribute to the medical teams who are exerting relentless efforts to serve the human being in terms of his health, protection and immunity, on more than one level. He added: "What we do is our professional and ethical duty, and the investment that we made in people, especially in the medical, nursing, radiological, laboratory and service crews, was an investment in place, for they are always with us…and they are our partners in the sacrifice: municipalities, mayors, municipal unions, and all civil societies that endeavored with the beginning of the crisis to be the field partner, the advocate and supporter of community immunity and the implementation of all decisions issued by the National Anti-Corona Committee, headed by Prime Minister Hassan Diab.”
Hassan asserted that as a crisis cell, its members are working to follow-up on and implement the decisions issued by the government or the crisis management ministerial committee, so that they do not remain on paper only. "Maintaining the dignity and rights of the employee, nurse and doctor is our common responsibility and we will not hesitate in meeting it,” he corroborated, assuring that the financial dues to the hospitals are being settled. Hassan highlighted the partnership and collaboration between the Ministries of Public Health and Industry in facing the country’s crises and economic hardships, hoping that the joint cooperation with the rest of the ministries will reflect the image that we desperately need these days to restore confidence in the state. “Today we are all in the service of the public health of the citizen, and on all Lebanese territories…In our shared path, our responsibility is to protect society, and what we are doing, God willing, is a guarantee for the safety of the citizen," Hassan concluded. to return to Lebanon. On Sunday, Lebanese expats returned from Kuwait, Dubai, Angola's Luanda and Rome. According to the Health Ministry they have all tested negative for the virus. Lebanon confirmed 11 new infections of the COVID-19 coronavirus on Sunday, which raises the country's total to 630.

Araji after a tour of the airport: There is a possibility to renew the process of transferring the Lebanese and opening Beirut airport
NNA/Monday/April 13/2020
Parliamentary Health Committee Head, MP Assem Araji, toured on Monday the various sections at Rafic Hariri International Airport in Beirut, accompanied by MP’s Fadi Alamah and Ali al-Moqdad and the Director General of Civil Aviation, Airport Director Fadi al-Hassan, and Head of the Airport Security Authority, Brigadier General George Doumit, to have a closer look at the measures undertaken to ensure the safe return of the Lebanese from abroad, in the context of the emerging Coronavirus epidemic. After the tour, MP Araji pointed out that during the cabinet meeting tomorrow, "there will be an assessment to determine whether or not a second round to evacuate the Lebanese from abroad will be implemented." He stressed that "the infected cases that appeared on the two planes coming from Rome and Paris were less than what the National Corona Committee expected, so I believe that there is a possibility to renew the process of transporting the Lebanese from abroad and opening Beirut airport, and this is what I hope for because there are many Lebanese students, whether in Georgia or Ukraine and Belarus, who are appealing to the government to ensure their return due to their difficult situation there.”For his part, Airport Director al-Hassan indicated that "the process of evacuating the Lebanese from abroad is carried out only via the Middle East Airlines or private planes that come to Lebanon. As for Kuwaiti, Emirati or Qatari planes, they come to evacuate their nationals or foreign nationals."

UNIFIL grant to Jaba Amel Municipalities Union to confront Corona
NNA/Monday/April 13/2020
The Union of Municipalities of Jabal Amel received at its headquarters in the town of Al-Taybeh on Monday, a grant from the UNIFIL peace-keeping forces operating in southern Lebanon, estimated at 37 million Lebanese pounds to purchase equipment needed to cope with the outbreak of the Corona epidemic. The grant was presented to the Municipalities Union Head Ali Taher Yassin, in the presence of the representative of the Civilian Affairs Office at the UNIFIL Wael al-Shami, the Civil-Military Cooperation Office Head in the South, First Army Lieutenant Sami Sabah, and representative of the Civil-Military Cooperation Office in the eastern sector, Major Stojanovic. It is to note that this grant is part of the budget allocated by the Union to confront the Coronavirus, which amounts to approximately 300 million pounds.

Arrival of MEA flight from Jeddah with 126 passengers on board
NNA/Monday/April 13/2020
A Middle East Airlines flight arrived at Rafic Hariri International Airport in Beirut around 4:30 p.m. today, coming from the city of Jeddah in the Saudi Kingdom, with 126 passengers on board, NNA correspondent at the Airport reported. The regular procedures adopted at Beirut Airport began immediately with the plane’s arrival carrying Lebanese citizens returning from abroad, including medical examinations and precautionary measures.

New Batch of Expats to Arrive in Beirut
Naharnet/April 13/2020
New planes repatriating Lebanese expats are expected to land in Beirut on Monday, this time carrying passengers from the Saudi city of Jeddah, Paris, Libreville and London. The number of passengers have not been identified yet. Beirut's international airport has been closed since March, along with schools, universities, restaurants and bars, and Lebanese have been urged to stay at home to stem the spread of COVID-19. On March 31, Lebanese authorities allowed expatriates to return despite a lockdown in response to the coronavirus pandemic. An estimated 20,000 people want

Report: PM Meets Political Aide to Speaker on ‘Haircut’ Draft Law
Naharnet/April 13/2020
Prime Minister Hassan Diab reportedly held a meeting with political aide to Speaker Nabih Berri, former Minister and MP Ali Hassan Khalil who relayed the Speaker’s rejection of any economic rescue plan targeting bank savings of Lebanese through a “haircut” procedure, the Saudi Asharq al-Awsat reported on Monday. Khalil “informed Diab frankly that Berri would not agree on a rescue draft law mainly the part aiming to deduct from the deposits of senior depositors,” a political source told the daily on condition of anonymity. “Diab and Khalil held an extended meeting and deliberated the issue for over two hours and half,” said the source. “The PM eventually reached a conviction that a haircut draft law will not be approved in the Cabinet or Parliament, and that the Speaker rejects it because it contradicts the Lebanese Constitution which states that Lebanon is a free economy system, and looks at deposits as a sacred issue,” added the source. Many officials have described the “haircut” draft law on savings as a “blatant theft.”The new cabinet is expected to outline its financial rescue plan as the country grapples with an unprecedented economic and financial crises, adding to the global coronavirus pandemic that also hit the country’s stricken economy.

Israel Fires Flare Bombs over Shebaa Outskirts

Naharnet/April 13/2020
The Israeli army launched eight photoflash bombs overnight over al-Shahal area on the outskirts of the town of Shebaa in the district of Hasbaya, the National News Agency reported on Monday. Moreover, an Israeli spy plane conducted intensive overflights over Beirut and its southern suburbs all day on Sunday, NNA said. The agency said the overflights have recurred much in the past days.

Lebanon: Food Imports Threatened by Coronavirus, USD Shortage
Beirut- Enas Sherri/Asharq Al Awsat/April 13/2020
Months ago, before the first confirmed case of coronavirus infection in Lebanon, and the subsequent measures such as public mobilization and quarantine, Lebanese importers and traders were warning of possible food shortages in local markets due to the dollar crisis.
These threats became more imminent in light of the complete closure imposed by some of the most virus-stricken countries and suppliers to Lebanon. In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Hani Bohsali, the head of food importers, confirmed the presence of a worsening problem in the import of food products but ruled out “reaching a disastrous situation represented by the depletion of basic products from the Lebanese market.” He explained: “The import chain is faltering because of coronavirus. There are many obstacles facing the importers, including the decision of some countries to reduce their exports in order to serve their domestic market, the halting or decrease of production in some factories in affected countries due to precautionary measures, delay of shipments due to restriction of movement, and the fact that ports in Lebanon are operating half-time in line with the general mobilization decision.” He asserted that many basic foods, such as cereals, rice, milk, and oils were available in quantities sufficient for up to two months in case import stops. “But the import has not stopped and will not, but it faces difficulties,” he stressed.
Bohsali noted that Lebanon imports 80 percent of its food products, and this will have repercussions “as long as coronavirus in the US and Europe is on the rise, and as long as the number of cases increases.”When talking about the possibility of food depletion, traders and importers confirm that the dollar crisis was more dangerous than the virus. Importers, especially in light of the pandemic, need foreign currency more than ever to reserve their share of products. Nabil Fahd, the head of supermarket owners’ association, expressed fears that some basic food products were running out because 20 percent of food produced locally needed raw materials imported from abroad.“If the (coronavirus) crisis continues, we will reach a stage in which some items will be depleted, especially those that are fully or partially manufactured, such as canned food, biscuits, and chocolate, but not basic food,” he underlined.

Rahi during Monday Easter Mass dedicated to France: We are called to be witnesses to resurrection in our way of life

NNA/Monday/April 13/2020
Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Bechara al-Rahi, presided over Easter Monday Mass service held in Bkirki today, devoted to the intention of France. In his homily, al-Rahi said: “We, as Christians, are called to be witnesses to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus through our new way of life, our evangelical culture, and the millennial civilization that has always been for the good of man and all of humanity.” “It is a civilization of love that promotes truth, justice, freedom for the children of God, peace and brotherhood among people,” he added. “We pray for the intention of France, its President Emmanuel Macron, and the French people, and we ask His Excellency Ambassador Bruno Foucher to convey to them our Easter well-wishes…We also extend our sincere wishes to him and his colleagues at the French Embassy in Beirut,” al-Rahi went on. The Patriarch expressed, on behalf of the Maronite Church, the Lebanese people and officials, deepest gratitude and appreciation for what France has provided to Lebanon, in helping it face its economic and social challenges especially in the medical field associated with the Corona virus. “Since the ninth of March, the beginning of the emergence of the Corona epidemic known as COVID 19, France has made donations to protect the health system and the medical teams working without interruption in Lebanese hospitals, in order to treat the infected and avoid new cases. It also provided a large amount of drugs, according to what the World Health Organization estimates, to treat 45 to 50 thousand people, 17 thousand of whom are admitted to hospital,” al-Rahi disclosed. He continued to indicate that “since the public health sector is one of the priorities of cooperation with Lebanon, the French Development Agency has decided to allocate a portion of its development programs to the emergency situations linked to the Corona epidemic, especially in the framework of the project that the Red Cross International Committee affiliates to the Rafic Hariri Hospital in Beirut, alongside other French aids currently under preparation.” “Additionally, France continues to support refugees in Lebanon through the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Refugees (UNRWA) and the International Supreme Agency in the treatment of Coronavirus patients,” al-Rahi added. “It is known that France, for its part, is suffering from an outbreak of the Coronavirus, but considers that through international cooperation we can limit the spread of this epidemic,” the Patriarch underscored.

Lebanese Army to start distributing aids on Tuesday
NNA/Monday/April 13/2020
The Lebanese Army Command announced in a statement on Monday, that the distribution of social assistance to citizens affected by the coronavirus will begin on Tuesday, in accordance with the decision of the Council of Ministers. The Army Command also confirmed that it will comply with the nominal regulations it received from the Presidency of the Council of Ministers.

Diaspora Businessmen Council: We place our potentials and capabilities to provide assistance when needed
NNA/Monday/April 13/2020
In a message to the “sons of the nation", the Lebanese Emigrants Businessmen Council announced on Monday that its capabilities and potentials are at the disposal of the Lebanese "to provide aid and assistance when necessary." President of the Council, Nassib Fawaz, addressed the people of the homeland in all parts of the world, affirming that the Council members place their “full potential and modest capabilities to offer help and assistance when needed.” “Through our faith in the Lord Almighty, first and foremost, and secondly in the capabilities of science, we will inevitably come out of this darkness into the light, and there is no doubt that it is a darkness over all humanity, yet it is a darkness that precedes the sun's shining and the near-emerging of the morning light,” he reassured. Fawaz reminded all fellow Lebanese citizens of the need to maintain utmost measures of safety and precaution, and to demonstrate coherence, unity and service amongst each another. He also urged them to commit to staying in their homes, while wishing those infected with the coronavirus a speedy recovery.

Druze Sheikh Aql contacts President of the Republic, spiritual figures on Easter
NNA/Monday/April 13/2020
“Sheikh Aql” of the Druze Unitarian Community, Sheikh Naim Hassan, contacted on Monday the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Beshara Boutros al-Rahi, Armenian Catholic Patriarch Aram I Keshishian, and Armenian Catholic Patriarch Gregoire Boutros XX, congratulating them on the holy occasion of Easter. Hassan hoped that the coming days will carry with them salvation for the whole world from the emerging epidemic and wished those infected speedy recoveries. He also hoped that Lebanon would be able to overcome the ordeals that have befallen it.

The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on April 13-14/2020
Pompeo: US welcomes apparent consensus on forming a government in Iraq
Reuters, Washington/Monday 13 April 2020
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Monday that his country welcomes an apparent agreement among Iraq’s Shia, Sunni and Kurdish groups to form a new government, adding it would need to be capable ofconfronting the coronavirus pandemic, helping the economy andbringing arms under control. “We welcome that Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish political leaders seem to have arrived at a consensus on government formation, and hope the new government puts Iraq’s interests first and meets the needs of the Iraqi people,” Pompeo said in a statement.

US oil sanctions against Iran are unjust, says Rouhani
Reuters/Monday 13 April 2020
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said US sanctions against Iran and Venezuela were unjust in a telephone call with Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on Monday and called for the two countries to cooperate together within the OPEC+ group. Washington re-imposed sanctions on Iran in 2018 when US President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from a 2015 nuclear deal with major powers. Iranian officials have said the sanctions have hampered efforts to combat a coronavirus outbreak in the country. Visit our dedicated coronavirus site here for all the latest updates. “America’s cruel and illegal sanctions on oil production against Iran and Venezuela are against international regulations and human principles,” Rouhani said, according to the official presidency website. He added, “We need to continue cooperation for reduction of production and the return of stability to prices.”The OPEC+ group of oil producers, comprising the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Russia and other countries, agreed at the weekend to cut output by 9.7 million barrels per day (bpd) in May and June, representing about 10 percent of global supply.

Coronavirus: US passes half a million cases as Trump threatens to cut WHO funding
Joyce Karam/The National/April 13/2020
The death toll passed 22,000 on Monday but the government is considering easing lockdowns and reopening the country by May 1
Coronavirus cases in the US exceeded 560,000 on Monday, as the Trump administration reviewed options on penalising the World Health Organisation (WHO) and slashing funding. The US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is due to make a set of recommendations this week for Donald Trump to sanction the organisation, which the US President accuses of knowing about the pandemic months before it broke out. “They could have called it [the epidemic] months earlier. They would have known, and they should have known, and they probably did know,” Mr Trump said this month.
The administration is looking at placing conditions on – and possibly also cutting – funding to the WHO. The US is the biggest contributor to the organisation, but Mr Trump said last week that he could slash by more than half the annual funding, which is currently $122 million (Dh448m).
The virus has now claimed more than 22,100 lives in the United States, with the first reported mortality on the USS Theodore Roosevelt ship. The vessel, which is moored in Guam in the Western Pacific, has at least 580 confirmed Covid-19 infections.
The spread of the virus has triggered a crisis in the Navy leadership following the dismissal of captain Brett Crozier, who sounded the alarm about the infections two weeks ago. The backlash from his dismissal led to the resignation of acting US Navy Secretary Thomas Modly last week.
The ruckus at the Navy coincided with another split in the administration between Mr Trump and the nation’s top infectious disease expert, Tony Fauci. Mr Trump retweeted a call to fire Dr Fauci on Sunday evening, after the expert went on CNN and acknowledged that an early shutdown in February could have saved lives.
Mr Fauci, known for his candid and science-based opinions, undermined Mr Trump’s message that the administration acted early to fight the pandemic. "Obviously, you could logically say that if you had a process that was ongoing and you started mitigation earlier, you could have saved lives," he said on Sunday.
The US public gave the celebrity doctor 27 more points than Mr Trump in a Yahoo YouGov poll on their handling of the pandemic. Mr Fauci confirmed on Sunday that there was a “pushback [from the administration] about shutting things down” in February.
The statement appeared to irk Mr Trump, who retweeted a call with the “Fire Fauci” hashtag in response. But by Monday, the US administration appeared to shift focus towards going after China and the WHO. Mr Trump has accused the organisation of being too close to China. “They are very, very China-centric… China always seems to get the better of the argument and I don’t like that, I really don’t like that. I don’t think that’s appropriate,” he said on Friday. The blame strategy is also part of Mr Trump’s campaign messaging to direct blame at China and accuse his Democratic rival, former Vice President Joseph Biden of being too close to the Chinese government. But polls and the economic forecast indicated trouble for Mr Trump on Monday as US stocks opened lower, and projections about a second wave of Covid-19 slowed down the plans for reopening. The Dow opened 0.4 per cent lower on Monday, and unemployment is expected to soar much higher in May. While Mr Trump is pushing for reopening the country by May 1, the director of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Robert Redfield was more conservative in his projections. Mr Redfield said on Sunday that a careful and gradual reopening is advised to prevent a second wave of infections.

Coronavirus: Iran prepares 10,000 graves in Tehran for victims
Yaghoub Fazeli, Al Arabiya English/Monday 13 April 2020
Iran has prepared 10,000 graves for coronavirus victims in the capital Tehran, the deputy director of Tehran's municipal urban services Mojtaba Yazdani said on Sunday. Authorities have allocated a new section in Tehran’s Behesht-e Zahra cemetery, the country’s largest cemetery, to coronavirus victims, Yazdani said, adding that 10,000 graves have so far been dug in this section, according to the official IRNA news agency. Yazdani did not say how many people have died of coronavirus in the capital. The Iranian health ministry does not disclose the coronavirus death toll for each province and instead reports the overall death toll for the entire country. As of Sunday, 4,474 in Iran have died from coronavirus, and there are 71,686 confirmed cases, according to the health ministry. The ministry has warned in a report that the national death toll from the virus could reach 30,000 by the start of May if social distancing regulations are relaxed. “Low-risk” businesses will reopen in the capital Tehran from April 18, President Hassan Rouhani said on Sunday, a day after “low-risk” economic activity was allowed to resume elsewhere in the country. Iran reopened government offices on Saturday after a brief nationwide lockdown to help contain the coronavirus outbreak in the country.

Khamenei representative attacks UNICEF, says UN children’s agency US ‘servant’

Yaghoub Fazeli, Al Arabiya English/Monday 13 April 2020
A representative of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said UNICEF seeks to target the family unit in Iran, calling the UN children’s agency a US “servant.”UNICEF is a part of the United States’ “cultural infiltration” plan against Iran, Khamenei’s representative in the Quds Force Ali Shirazi wrote in a commentary piece published by the semi-official Tasnim news agency. The Quds Force is the overseas arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). UNICEF has sent several pharmaceutical and health aid packages to Iran to fight coronavirus, including guidelines in the Persian language for protecting children against the virus and creating a secure environment for them at home during the outbreak, according to the semi-official Mehr news agency. Read more: Iran expels Doctors Without Borders team, rejects coronavirus aid Shirazi criticized the inclusion of UNICEF activities in Iranian school textbooks, saying “the enemies of Islam” use organizations such as UNICEF to pursue their owns goals. The “westernization” of Iranian lifestyle as well as “destroying the family unit” are some of the US’ goals which UNICEF pursues in Iran, he said. Shirazi did not present any evidence for his claims. He added, UNICEF uses “human rights, women's rights, children's rights, gender equality and women's empowerment” as cover to “instil western beliefs into others.”The agency is “a servant of America and has no purpose other than to promote western culture,” Shirazi wrote. UNICEF provides humanitarian and developmental aid to children worldwide

Coronavirus: Iran COVID-19 cases up to 73,303, death toll increases to 4,585
Reuters, Dubai/Monday 13 April 2020
Iran's death toll from the new coronavirus has risen to 4,585, with 111 deaths overnight, a health ministry official tweeted on Monday, adding the total number of infected cases had reached 73,303 in the most-affected Middle Eastern country.Read the latest updates in our dedicated coronavirus section. “Fortunately 45,983 of those infected with the virus have recovered ... There were 1,617 new infected cases in the past 24 hours,” tweeted Alireza Vahabzadeh, an adviser to Iran's health minister.
Health Ministry spokesman Kianush Jahanpur told state TV that 3,877 of those infected with the new coronavirus were in critical condition.

Three Turkish prisoners die of coronavirus, says Justice Minister

AFP, Ankara/Monday 13 April 2020
Three Turkish prisoners have died from the coronavirus, Turkey’s justice minister said Monday as he announced the first cases of convicts diagnosed with the disease. A total of 17 convicts in five open prisons have contracted the virus, Abdulhamit Gul told reporters in Ankara.
“Three of them unfortunately died during their treatment in hospital,” he said. Some convicts are sent to open prisons towards the end of their sentences to serve out the remainder of their punishment as the state prepares them for release. They are given permission to leave for temporary periods and must accept work, according to the Civil Society in Penal System Association. Thirteen of the sick convicts are in a good condition in hospital, Gul said, but one prisoner with chronic diseases remains in intensive care. He did not give any further details on where the prisoners were but insisted the necessary precautions had been taken in every jail. “There are no positive cases in closed prisons,” he added. Turkey has nearly 57,000 COVID-19 infections and around 1,200 have died, according to health ministry figures published on Sunday.

Turkey Confirms Providing Israel with Medical Supplies in Virus Fight
Ankara - Saeed Abdulrazek/Asharq Al Awsat//Monday 13 April 2020
Turkey approved the dispatch of medical equipment and supplies to Israel to help it cope with the spread of COVID-19.
“There was a demand for medical aid from Israel, and it will be completed within days. We will simultaneously send medical supplies to Palestine,” announced presidential spokesman Ibrahim Kalin. Kalin recalled that Turkey has been delivering medical equipment to many countries since the beginning of the pandemic, including Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, five Balkan countries, Azerbaijan and Qatar. Earlier, Israeli Yedioth Ahronoth daily confirmed that Turkey will send medical supplies to Israel as part of a "commercial deal", not as "humanitarian aid." A Turkish official told Bloomberg that the Turkish government approved the sale of medical equipment to Israel for humanitarian reasons. The equipment sent includes: face masks, protective overalls and sterile gloves to help the country fight the coronavirus outbreak. Three planes from Israel are expected to land in southern Incirlik air base to pick the cargo on Thursday, said the official, who is familiar with the shipment and asked not to be named discussing the sensitive issue. Turkey will donate medical aid for the Palestinians within the next few days, the official said. Turkish officials refrained from commenting on the matter for days, however, Turkey’s English Channel TRT mentioned Bloomberg’s report in one of its reports on Turkish aid to countries around the world fighting the coronavirus. Israeli media, including the Hayom newspaper, said Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s “important step” reveals the improvement of relations between Tel Aviv and Ankara.
Israel’s Channel 12 reported that the deal is pending at Istanbul airport after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office refused a condition to allow aid to reach Palestinian authorities without any holdups. Netanyahu refused to bargain, considering that Erdogan had returned to his negative policy against Israel, and thus froze the deal and aid. According to the channel, Israelis outside the government bought the shipment of Turkish equipment, which was supposed to be distributed to medical facilities in Israel.

Hamas Says No Progress Made in Prisoner Deal with Israel
Ramallah - Kifah Zboun/Asharq Al-Awsat/April 13/2020
The Hamas movement denied reports that progress has been made in the prisoner swap file with Israel. There have been no developments in the issue, said Hamas official Moussa Doudin. Doudin, who is responsible for the prisoner file, said claims that a deal is about to be struck are “baseless”, adding that no serious contacts are taking place and the Israeli leadership is not taking the issue seriously. Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the only progress made is that Hamas is ready with its proposals, requests and lists, but contacts have not risen to the desired level. Hamas politburo chief Ismail Haniyeh confirmed last week that a prisoner deal with Israel could be accomplished if Tel Aviv responded to the requirements. He did not specify the conditions, but Hamas has long called for the release of prisoners Israel had recaptured. Hamas and Israel are both looking forward to a comprehensive deal, but reports now indicate there will be a partial agreement according to an initiative proposed by the movement’s leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar. Sinwar told al-Aqsa television last week that the movement is willing to make partial concessions on the issue of the two Israeli soldiers in its custody, Hadar Goldin and Oron Shaul. He said that Hamas is ready for the humanitarian initiative, in exchange for Israel’s approval to release the elderly, sick and female Palestinian prisoners. Sinwar did not clarify what he meant by partial concessions, but this could include providing information about the soldiers in Gaza, whether they are alive or dead, and may include the release of civilians. The Israeli government responded by saying it was ready to start indirect talks with Hamas to conclude an agreement leading to the release of Israeli prisoners in the Gaza Strip. Countries such as Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, Sweden and Germany are expected to contribute to help move the talks forward.However, sources confirmed that contacts were made with Hamas after the Israeli announcement, but that did not progress into anything further. Tel Aviv is in no rush to strike a deal because it is preoccupied with efforts to form a new government and the fight against the coronavirus outbreak.
Besides Shaul and Goldin, whom Hamas captured in the summer 2014 war, it is also detaining Avera Mengistu, an Israeli of Ethiopian descent, and Hashem Badawi al-Sayyed, of Arab descent. Both crossed into Gaza at two different times after the war. Israel believes Shaul and Goldin are dead, however, Hamas does not provide any information about them.

Gantz urges Netanyahu to rise to the emergency and share power

DebkaFile/April 13/2020
It’s either unity or a costly fourth ballot, said Kahol Lavan leader Benny Gantz in an emotional broadcast to the nation Monday night, April 13, the last day of his mandate for forming a government. Turning to Likud leader PM Binyamin Netanyahu, he said: “This is our moment of truth.” A caretaker government can’t cope with the colossal challenges posed by the coronavirus crisis, dead victims piling up, a million jobless, destitute families and the huge task of putting the country back on its feet. “You need to have me aboard,” he stressed. The response from the prime minister’s office was instantaneous: “Let’s meet tonight and sign the deal, “said Netanyahu. While declaring that he was putting self-interest and politics to one side, Gantz nevertheless touched on the most sensitive point at issue when he said he would never move from his principles on “democracy and the rule of law.” This phrase has been taken by Likud as a euphemism for defending the prosecution’s corruption case against the prime minister. On Thursday, the Knesset ends its Passover recess and goes back to the business of legislation under its new Speaker… Benny Gantz. His party had pledged in its election campaign to enact a law disqualifying a person under indictment for heading a government. If he goes through with this law, Likud will drop unity talks and accuse Gantz of insincerity in seeking a power-sharing accord. This will bring a fourth election that much closer, since President Reuven Rivlin has said he will not pass the premiership candidacy to Netanyahu – that is, of course, unless he can muster a parliamentary majority for a new government coalition in the coming 21 days remaining for this attempt. Coronavirus cases in Israel rose by Monday night to 11,586, of whom 183 were in serious condition and 132 on respirators. The number of dead reached 116.

Chairman of UAE Banking Federation: COVID-19 Will Change Economic Life, Everyone Must Adapt
Dubai - Mosaed al-Zayani/Asharq Al-Awsat/April 13/2020
A senior Emirati banker said that economic life in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic will change for everyone, calling on companies and institutions to adapt to the new situation. Abdul-Aziz Al-Ghurair, the CEO of Mashreq Group and Chairman of the UAE Banking Federation, said that the UAE government and the central bank were looking to back private sector companies and institutions by supporting the economy in the country. In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat through a video call, Al-Ghurair said: “Everyone desires that companies and small and medium enterprises and individuals working in the country keep their businesses running.”He explained that crises “usually create great opportunities for some companies to adjust their way of business, by knowing the best means to manage them.”“There is no doubt that some companies, which cannot respond to the current circumstances, will find difficulties to survive,” he emphasized. Al-Ghurair noted that recent initiatives launched by the UAE government constituted the largest support for the banking sector. He pointed out that the stimulus amounted to about 265 billion dirhams (USD 72.1 billion), including 205 billion dirhams (USD 55.8 billion) to increase liquidity, in addition to 50 billion dirhams (USD 13.6 billion) represented in reducing the capital adequacy requirements to give banks the opportunity to start offering additional facilities without resorting to increasing their capital. According to the senior banking official, the total number of loans granted to individuals and companies from the private sector, except for the public sector or semi-public companies, amounted to one trillion dirhams (USD 272.2 billion). “Growth may not be at the same pace in the coming four years, but I would like to assure everyone that there is a sufficient package of liquidity to be used in the banking sector,” he stressed. He also said that depositors have to take precautionary decisions within the institution, by reducing costs and expansive operations, and waiving some imaginative projects that they wished to implement. The UAE leadership attaches great importance to controlling health conditions after approving the stimulus package to bring life back to normal, according to Al-Ghurair.

Cautious Hope for Pandemic Peak as Spain Readies to Reopen Some Factories
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/April 13/2020
The death toll from the coronavirus pandemic has slowed in some of the worst-hit countries, with Spain readying Monday to reopen parts of its economy as governments grapple with a once-in-a-century recession.
Italy, France and the US have all seen a drop in COVID-19 deaths in the past 24 hours, with Italy -- the European nation most afflicted -- reporting its lowest toll in more than three weeks. It came as Pope Francis delivered an unprecedented livestream message to a world under lockdown on Easter Sunday, and Britain's Boris Johnson left hospital, thanking medics for saving his life. More than half of the planet's population is staying home as part of efforts to stem the spread of the virus, which emerged in China late last year and has now killed at least 112,500 people, overwhelming healthcare systems and crippling the world economy. Spain's death toll has fallen in recent days, but as a small bump in deaths was reported on Sunday, Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez warned that the locked-down country was "far from victory". "We are all keen to go back out on the streets... but our desire is even greater to win the war and prevent a relapse," he said, as some companies were set to resume operations at the end of a two-weeks halt of all non-essential activity. In the US -- now the world's worst-hit nation with a fifth of all deaths and more than half a million confirmed cases -- the government's top infectious disease expert added to cautious optimism that the pandemic may have reached its peak. Anthony Fauci said parts of the country could begin easing restrictions in May, but warned that the world's biggest economy would not turn back on like a "light switch".
"We are hoping by the end of the month we can look around and say, OK, is there any element here that we can safely and cautiously start pulling back on?" Fauci told CNN.
'Easter of solitude'
President Donald Trump had previously wanted the US to be back to normal by Easter, but most of the country remained at a standstill and churches took celebrations online. Many of the world's more than two billion Christians celebrated Easter from the confines of their homes, while Pope Francis delivered a livestream message from a hauntingly empty Vatican. "For many, this is an Easter of solitude lived amid the sorrow and hardship that the pandemic is causing, from physical suffering to economic difficulties," he said. One priest in Rio de Janeiro blessed the Brazilian city from a helicopter, while another in Portugal addressed the faithful from the open top of a moving convertible car. In Britain, which has logged more than 10,000 deaths, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Sunday he had been discharged after "a week in which the NHS has saved my life, no question", referring to the country's state-run National Health Service. Britain is now seeing daily death tolls to match those previously seen in Italy and Spain, after recording nearly 1,000 fatalities on Friday and Saturday. There were 737 new deaths reported Sunday. Johnson, like Trump, had initially resisted stringent measures such as shutting down public places.
Spain ends 'economic hibernation'
Some factory and construction workers in Spain were set to return to work on Monday, with police to hand out face masks at metro and train stations. The fortnight of "economic hibernation" is about to be lifted, drawing criticism from some regional leaders and unions, but the rest of the lockdown restrictions in the nation of around 47 million people will remain in place. In China, where authorities appeared to have the virus under control last week, officials reported 108 new symptomatic cases Monday, the highest number of confirmed infections in a single day in over a month.
Imported cases accounted for most of the total, the National Health Commission said, underscoring why the government has been so focused on preventing new outbreaks stemming from international arrivals. Meanwhile, there were also worrying signs the virus could be taking hold in new, and vulnerable, parts of the world. Conflict-wracked Yemen reported its first case last week, raising fears of a devastating outbreak in the war-torn country. In Mumbai's crowded Dharavi slum -- one of Asia's biggest and the inspiration for the 2008 Oscar-winning film "Slumdog Millionaire" -- more than 43 cases have been confirmed. While sub-Saharan Africa has not been as badly hit by the coronavirus pandemic as some other parts of the world, the economy is being pummelled. Governments are under pressure to keep populations safe while preventing economic collapse, amid warnings of a downturn not seen since the Great Depression.
But the World Health Organization has warned countries against lifting lockdown restrictions too early.

Erdogan Refuses Minister's Resignation over Turkey Lockdown Chaos
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/April 13/2020
Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Sunday refused to accept the resignation of his interior minister over an abrupt nationwide lockdown that triggered a spate of panic-buying. Suleyman Soylu came in for fierce criticism after the 48-hour shutdown to counter the spread of the coronavirus was announced on Friday night with just two hours' notice. The declaration sent thousands flocking to markets and bakeries in defiance of social distancing rules. Roads in Istanbul and Ankara were also packed, with long queues forming outside off-licences, grocery stores and banks. Reacting to the chaotic scenes on Friday, Soylu said the lockdown had been on the "instructions" of the president. But on Sunday the powerful 50-year-old interior minister accepted "entire responsibility for the implementation of this measure", which he said had been carried out "in good faith". Erdogan however refused to accept Soylu's resignation. "He is going to continue to carry out his functions," he added. Soylu took up the interior ministry portfolio in August 2016, a month after a bloody failed coup attempt against Erdogan. The government had come under harsh criticism from the opposition and on social media for the chaotic implementation of the lockdown, accusing the authorities of endangering the lives of thousands of people. Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu of the main opposition party, who had previously called for a lockdown, was also critical of the short notice and complained of not being informed in advance. After the initial chaos, the shutdown, which ended at midnight (2100 GMT) on Sunday, was generally respected. Turkey has nearly 57,000 COVID-19 infections and around 1,200 have died, according to the latest health ministry figures.

Virus 'Disaster in the Making' in War-Torn Syria

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/April 13/2020
As Europe and the United States struggle to contain the coronavirus pandemic, experts warn that disaster looms in war-torn Syria, where hospitals are unable to meet existing needs and hygiene conditions are dire. The outbreak has infected more than 1.8 million people and killed more than 112,000 around the world since emerging in China in December last year. In Syria, the Damascus government has closed borders, forbidden movement between provinces and shut schools and restaurants in an effort to stem the spread of the virus. Official numbers are low with two deaths and 19 confirmed cases, but only 100 patients are being tested daily, with half of the testing carried out in the capital Damascus. And while the government has regained control of most of the country after almost a decade of civil war, some areas are still held by pro-Ankara rebels and Kurds. Experts accuse Damascus of minimising its death toll for political motives. "Medical staff believe that there are many people who are dying in Syria with the symptoms of the virus," said Zaki Mehchy, senior consulting fellow at London-based think tank Chatham House. "But the security agencies ask them or order them not to mention it, especially to the media," he added.
'Impossible physical distancing'
Aid groups are sounding the alarm on the potentially devastating consequences of a severe outbreak in Syria, where nine years of war have hit hospitals and left them ill-equipped to deal with the pandemic. "There is a disaster in the making," said Emile Hokayem, Middle East analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London (IISS).  According to the World Health Organization (WHO), less than two-thirds of hospitals were up and running at the end of 2019 and 70 percent of healthcare workers have fled since the war began in 2011.  The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) warned that physical distancing is impossible in displacement camps in Idlib, the last rebel-held province, which was already enduring a humanitarian crisis before the pandemic started. "A lack of food, clean water and exposure to cold weather have already left hundreds of thousands of people in poor health, making them even more vulnerable," said Misty Buswell from aid group International Rescue Committee (IRC), adding that the devastation in Idlib could be "unimaginable". The IRC said that almost all of the 105 intensive care beds and 30 adult ventilators in Idlib were already in use. WHO said testing would start in Idlib at the end of March, but little help is to be expected from Damascus, according to Mazen Gharibah, associate researcher at the London School of Economics. "One cannot simply assume that the regime -- which was systematically targeting the hospitals three weeks ago -- is going to provide the same hospitals with medical equipment next week," he said. Activists have repeatedly accused the government of targeting hospitals in rebel-held areas, a charge denied by Damascus.
Catastrophic politicisation'
A ceasefire negotiated at the beginning of March for the northwest region between the two main foreign power brokers in Syria's war, Russia and Turkey, has so far held. But according to the IRC, "the security and political vacuum the pandemic will create is likely to be exploited by actors involved in the Syrian conflict -- including ISIS (jihadists) -- to serve their interests". For Syria expert Fabrice Balanche, associate professor and research director at the University of Lyon 2, "this epidemic is a way for Damascus to show that the Syrian state is efficient, and all territories should be returned under its governance".
But Gharibah said politicisation of the pandemic by the Syrian government was catastrophic, accusing the regime of "using the current pandemic for its own political gains by gambling with the lives of millions of people".  Experts say there is a risk that the pandemic will lead to a decrease in humanitarian assistance as donor countries focus on kickstarting their economies. "With attention and resources at home focused on recovery, it is going to be a lot harder to make a political case for sustaining humanitarian operations abroad," Hokayem said. Aid groups warned against cuts in aid at a time when needs are critical. "Should we fail, not only will the most vulnerable pay the price today for the inaction of the international community, the consequences will be felt across the globe for years, if not decades, to come," said IRC president David Miliband.

Millions Watch Andrea Bocelli Sing in Empty Milan Cathedral

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/April 13/2020
Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli performed a solo Easter concert from an empty Milan Cathedral streamed live to millions of people around the world in coronavirus lockdown. The "Music for Hope" performance, which was streamed on YouTube from Milan's Duomo cathedral, has been watched more than 22 million times so far. Accompanied by an organist, Bocelli sang four songs inside the magnificent Gothic building and ended with a rendition of "Amazing Grace" from the cathedral steps with a montage of images showing the empty streets of Paris, London and New York. "On the day in which we celebrate the trust in a life that triumphs, I'm honoured and happy to answer 'Si' to the invitation of the City and the Duomo of Milan," the visually impaired star said in a message played before the short concert. "Thanks to music, streamed live, bringing together millions of clasped hands everywhere in the world, we will hug this wounded Earth's pulsing heart," he said. The Lombardy region, of which Milan is the capital, has been the hardest hit in Italy's coronavirus crisis, with more than 9,000 deaths. "Andrea Bocelli is a true gift from God. This was beautiful and just what I needed to see and feel right now. Thank you Mr. Bocelli for sharing your gift of your voice and music with us," wrote YouTube viewer Peggy Young. Churches in Italy remain closed and even prayers given by Pope Francis on Easter Sunday were livestreamed.

The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on April 13-14/2020
Pandemic Exposes the Paranoid Style of Iran’s Supreme Leader
Tzvi Kahn/FDD/April 13/2020
Iran’s supreme leader wants you to know that it’s not his fault.
On March 22, as the coronavirus pandemic continued to ravage Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei suggested that the United States bore responsibility for his nation’s plight. In a speech rejecting US offers of medical aid, Khamenei declared—echoing a claim first promulgated by Chinese officials—that America may have created the virus in a deliberate effort to target Iranians.
“I do not know how real this accusation is, but when it exists, who in their right mind would trust you to bring them medication?” Khamenei said on the same day his government announced 21,638 coronavirus infections and 1,685 deaths in Iran to date. “Possibly your medicine is a way to spread the virus more.”
It’s hardly the first time Tehran has promoted conspiracy theories.
Khamenei asserted that America created ISIS and al-Qaeda in order to sow division among Muslims. He argued that Washington was behind the November 2015 terror attack in Paris, where ISIS killed 129 people. He claimed that Iran’s enemies—chiefly the United States—“planted the Zionist regime in the region so that they can create discord and busy regional countries with themselves.” He contended that Sunni Arab nations opposed to Iran constitute a tool of the West, stating that Iran’s enemies “sometimes use certain Islamic countries to say and do what they want.”
Such conspiracy theories do not merely seek to deflect blame for the failures of the regime, which has badly mismanaged the coronavirus crisis, the economy, the environment, and a range of other policy issues. Rather, they also reflect deeply felt convictions that lie at the heart of the regime’s radical Islamist ideology.
According to this worldview, the United States and Iran remain locked in a permanent struggle for the soul of the Middle East. Shiite Iran, Khamenei believes, amounts to the vanguard of authentic Islam in a region corrupted by Western influence and values.
In this context, America poses not only a physical threat but also a spiritual threat: through cultural and political infiltration, it seeks to transform the Middle East into a secular, godless region marked by violence, greed, and promiscuity. In the regime’s eyes, both Israel and the Sunni Arab states are agents of Washington, which secretly guides and manipulates their actions as part of a nefarious plot to overthrow Iran’s regime. Thus, America’s defeat is both a political objective and a religious imperative.
Waging war against the United States “is among our fundamental duties,” Khamenei affirmed in an August 2015 speech. “It is one of the principles of the Revolution. If fighting against arrogance does not take place, it means that we are not followers of the Holy Quran at all.” America, he declared in an October 2015 address, “is a transgressor by nature. It is in the nature of world-devouring powers to transgress, to advance, to occupy, and to dig in their claws.”
In another speech a month later, he asserted—citing a statement by the Islamic Republic’s founding father, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—that America “was behind all problems” and lies at “the root of all evil things.” “If they could destroy the Islamic Republic,” Khamenei added, “they will not hesitate even for a moment.”
This Manichean vision, rooted in an inflated perception of American omnipotence, omnipresence, and moral incorrigibility, reflects what the late American academic Richard Hofstadter dubbed the “paranoid style” of politics.
“The paranoid spokesman,” he writes in a famous 1964 essay, “sees the fate of conspiracy in apocalyptic terms—he traffics in the birth and death of whole worlds, whole political orders, whole systems of human values. He is always manning the barricades of civilization.” Moreover, unlike “the rest of us, the enemy is not caught in the toils of the vast mechanism of history, himself a victim of his past, his desires, his limitations. He wills, indeed he manufactures, the mechanism of history, or tries to deflect the normal course of history in an evil way.”
Hofstadter wasn’t writing specifically about Iran, but he notes that the “paranoid style is not confined to our own country and time; it is an international phenomenon.” And in the case of contemporary Iran, the Islamist regime clearly regards itself as the historical counterweight to America, defending nothing less than Islamic civilization itself from an evil and imperialistic superpower.
Tehran thus adopts a paranoid style that finds expression in a toxic fusion of religious millenarianism and old-fashioned conspiracy theories, all of which seek to demonize the enemy while simultaneously explaining why Iran’s counter-efforts have yet to yield sufficient results. In this sense, Iran’s paranoid style expresses both weakness and strength. It lionizes America but also lionizes Iran by declaring that Iran, with the help of God, will eventually—inevitably—overcome America’s predations.
This mentality helps explain Tehran’s bungled response to the coronavirus. Khamenei’s attribution of the pandemic to a US campaign of biological warfare seeks not merely to excuse his own failure to prevent its spread. Rather, it also implicitly conveys defiance. Because Khamenei regards Iran’s victory over America as inexorable, the perceived might of Washington would make the Islamist regime’s triumph that much more impressive.
In the meantime, the Iranian people will continue to suffer the consequences of the rapidly spreading virus. Unlike the myopic regime that leads them, Iranians know where the ultimate fault truly lies.
*Tzvi Kahn is a research fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Follow him on Twitter @TzviKahn. FDD is a Washington, DC-based, nonprofit, and nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.

Iran's Military Likely Can't Fight Thanks to Coronavirus

Michael Rubin/The National Interest/April 13/2020
Expert: "One of the reasons why the 1917-1918 Spanish flu struck down so many in the prime of life was that it tore through military barracks. If the Revolutionary Guards are at the forefront of the Iranian fight against COVID-19, it is unlikely they will retain pre-COVID-19 readiness."
Secrecy, denial, and incompetence have condemned thousands of Iranians to their deaths amidst the coronavirus outbreak. Even if Iranian leaders now adopt best-practices, it is likely too late to meaningfully control the virus’s continued spread in Tehran. Traffic jams show that the city—which has grown seven-fold since the 1979 Islamic Revolution—has not practiced social isolation and will likely suffer far more casualties.
While Iranian reporting is opaque, it is likely that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and their families have suffered disproportionately within Iranian society. When Iranian authorities first acknowledged that the coronavirus was out-of-control, they put the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of the domestic response. Mohammad Pakpour, commander of the IRGC-Ground Forces for the past decade, told an Iranian audience that his forces were playing a pivotal role in all aspects of the Iranian public health fight, from securing the supply chain to sending forces into the infected zones to spray disinfectant or set up field hospitals.
In almost all countries, first responders have suffered because of their proximity to the ill, and it is unlikely that Iran would be immune from such a phenomenon. The living quarters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps likely compound the problem. One of the reasons why the 1917-1918 Spanish flu struck down so many in the prime of life was that it tore through military barracks. If the Revolutionary Guards are at the forefront of the Iranian fight against COVID-19, it is unlikely they will retain pre-COVID-19 readiness.
Any outbreak among the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps will likely have ramifications beyond immediate military readiness. Among the Islamic Republic’s military veterans, there are long-standing grievances with regard to health care. The government largely abandoned those injured during the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War. The most dysfunctional Veterans Administrations hospitals in the United States outperform by far the best medical centers available to Iranian veterans. Those who served Iran to fight the pandemic and suffer long-term health complications due to their troubles will breed resentment toward the government. The Iranian government’s financial woes and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ prioritization of support for foreign interventions over pensions will breed resentment among the families of those who succumb to COVID-19. And while the Guards’ top commanders are millionaires several times over and live posh lifestyles, most Guardsmen live a more impoverished existence in the apartment blocs of western Tehran or in the slums to the city’s south. This means that they are more likely to spread the disease through their own communities than those in more affluent northern neighborhoods.
The Revolutionary Guards will also likely suffer future recruitment woes. While the organization depicts itself as the ideological vanguard, it is as faction-ridden as Iranian politics. There are many ideological hardliners—the late Qassem Soleimani or his successor Esmail Ghaani, for example—but there are also those who join the Revolutionary Guards for more cynical reasons. Iran is still a conscript society and so, if military service is a necessity, better to join a Guards unit which will pay more and provide better connections and opportunities in the future. Future generations may think twice, however, about volunteering for the Guards if its missions expose them to greater harm. Indeed, the Guards and the paramilitary Basij were also suffering a manpower shortage due to resistance among many ordinary Iranians to deployments into Syria, leading the Guards’ leadership to rely increasingly on Lebanese Hezbollah or Iraqi, Afghan, or Pakistani Shi’ite militia groups.
Beyond eroding Iran’s military readiness, the impact of the virus on public perception will be huge. Even the Islamic Republic’s most ardent apologists recognize that there is a growing trust deficit between the Iranian public and the regime. The problem is not just at home. Tehran must often temper its strategic partnerships in response to public distrust of its international partners. Take Russia, for example: While Iranian authorities have pursued an unprecedented rapprochement with Russia, the Iranian public has neither forgiven nor forgotten centuries of Russian imperial exploitation and so Iranian authorities must at times put brakes on the partnership or at least keep some aspects of it secret.
This historic distrust of Russia is one reason why Iranian authorities sought to hedge their bets. Jomhuri-e Eslami, one of the Islamic Republic’s flagship newspapers, published an article (no longer available online) on July 21, 2018 arguing that Revolutionary Leader Ruhollah Khomeini’s slogan “Neither East nor West but Islamic Republic” should not prevent Tehran from outreach to Beijing. Yayha Rahim-Safavi, a former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and a top military advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, drove home the point in a January 2019 speech.
The World Health Organization may condemn linking COVID-19 to its origins in Wuhan, China, but most Iranians will not be so politically correct. They recognize that it was their government’s trade with China and its air links coupled with a diplomatic decision not to antagonize Chinese authorities that first introduced the disease into Iran and facilitated its rapid spread. Whereas just a few months ago, most Iranians were indifferent to their government’s outreach to China and the growing Chinese presence in Iran, that too will likely change as suspicion of China and the Chinese will likely taint government outreach. Russia will always have a greater stigma within Iranian society than China, but no longer will Tehran be able to sell its turn toward Beijing as cost-free. That will not mean that Iranian leaders would abandon their eastern strategy, but even ardent regime Islamists recognize the potency of grassroots Iranian nationalism and will think twice about openly crossing it.
* Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). You can follow him on Twitter: @mrubin1971.

Al-Kadhimi must steer Iraq away from US-Iran tensions
Osama Al-Sharif/Arab News/April 13/2020
Iraq’s President Barham Salih, left, and newly appointed Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi, right, in Baghdad, Iraq, April 9, 2020. (Reuters)
Even before Iraq was hit by the coronavirus pandemic, party squabbling and mass protests had paralyzed the country’s political establishment. Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi was forced to resign last November and, since then, two candidates have tried, and failed, to win parliament’s support to form a new government. The country is deeply divided and US-Iran tensions have cast a shadow over attempts to turn the page and end the longest political stalemate since the American invasion of 2003.
President Barham Salih had nominated Mohammed Tawfik Alawi, a former communications minister, for the top job in February, but he was seen as too close to Tehran and his bid was foiled by the street and Sunni and Kurdish parties. Then Salih picked Adnan Al-Zurfi, the governor of Najaf, but Shiite parties accused him of being pro-US and he was forced to withdraw last week.
Now there is hope that a consensus has been reached after Salih nominated the head of the National Intelligence Service, Mustafa Al-Kadhimi, to form the next government. Al-Kadhimi, a former journalist and a fierce opponent of Saddam Hussein, has never joined a political party or been accused of corruption. On selecting him, Salih described Al-Kadhimi as a “patriot and cultural figure… well known for his integrity, moderation (and) giving consideration for all Iraqis regarding their general rights.”
As he was handed his mandate by the president, Iraq’s political elites were in attendance, indicating that, for now, there is general support for his nomination by both Sunni and Shiite parties and figures. Perhaps more importantly, Al-Kadhimi, whose previous position enabled him to deal with the US and Iran without being seen as an ally of either, has been given the initial nod of approval by both Washington and Tehran.
“If Al-Kadhimi is an Iraqi nationalist, if he is dedicated to pursuing a sovereign Iraq, if he is committed to fighting corruption, this would be great for Iraq, and I think it would be great for our bilateral relationship,” US Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs David Schenker was quoted as saying last week. Meanwhile, Iran’s Foreign Ministry described Al-Kadhimi’s designation as “a step in the right direction.”
Following his nomination, the 53-year-old pledged to form a government that makes the aspirations and demands of Iraqis the top priority. He has 30 days to present his Cabinet to parliament for approval. The road ahead will be fraught with challenges. Even though he has the support of the major political players, he is yet to put together a Cabinet that meets the demands of the people, while striking a balance that serves the sectarian reality on the ground.
Al-Kadhimi pledged to form a service-oriented government, but the real test will be in dealing with the sectarian quota system that has been denounced by the protesters as a main reason for the endemic corruption that has brought Iraq to its knees.
His job will not be easy. Aside from overcoming the coronavirus challenge — there have been more than 1,300 cases in Iraq and over 70 deaths — the next government will have to deal with worsening economic conditions in light of plummeting oil prices. The dire living conditions that triggered mass protests last year have not improved and the pressure will be on to come up with immediate solutions. With most of Iraq under lockdown because of the virus, protests have receded, but it is only a matter of time before people take to the streets once more as living conditions worsen, especially for those who were already suffering before the shutdown.
Meanwhile, Iraq will remain at the center of US-Iran tensions. Pro-Iranian militias will continue to threaten the US military presence in Iraq as Tehran feels the impact of economic sanctions and the spread of the coronavirus. One of the militias that rejected Al-Kadhimi’s nomination was Kata’ib Hezbollah, which accused the chief of Iraqi intelligence of involvement in January’s US assassination of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani and Iraqi militia leader Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis. Interestingly, Al-Kadhimi is supported by the Fatah coalition, which is headed by militia leader and Iran loyalist Hadi Al-Amiri, the State of Law coalition of former Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki, and the Hikma movement headed by cleric Ammar Al-Hakim.
The real test will be in dealing with the sectarian quota system that has been denounced by the protesters.
Last week, the US offered a $10 million reward for information on Sheikh Mohammed Al-Kawtharani, one of the military leaders of Kata’ib Hezbollah. The US accuses Al-Kawtharani, who was an associate of Soleimani, of coordinating with pro-Iran militias that it accuses of carrying out attacks against coalition military bases and Western embassies in Baghdad’s Green Zone.
For Al-Kadhimi to succeed in his mission, both the US and Iran must stop using Iraq as their own backyard in order to settle scores and allow the Iraqi people to emerge from years of sectarian feuds and political corruption. That is easier said than done and Al-Kadhimi will soon find that he will be walking a tightrope as he tries to balance his country’s interests against those of Tehran and Washington.
*Osama Al-Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman. Twitter: @plato010

Virus has potential positive effect on foreign policy
Maria Maalouf/Arab News/April 13/2020
It is essential that any assumptions about America’s decline, which have to bear the weight of the US’ status as a superpower in the post-coronavirus disease (COVID-19) world, be analyzed carefully and critically. America’s power is so imposing that many questions have been raised as to why it has been in a big quandary and looks weakened during the COVID-19 epidemic. There is a sketch of a vulnerable America that has coincided with the global virus onslaught. Yet the US foreign policy of realism will be the diplomatic avenue for its conduct in the world. Realism in foreign policy stipulates the use of power in articulating a national interest while recognizing the importance of alliances and the role of history and geography in any country’s foreign relations.
The coronavirus crisis has provoked every country in the world not to be entirely independent, because every country needs help. Many adapted quickly, sealing borders, declaring a state of national shutdown, and trying to heal those infected to lower the death rate. America did this, but it never abandoned its fundamental principles of being a democratic, capitalist society and a powerful and resourceful nation. This has been manifested in many questions, such as what will happen to the 2020 presidential election? How much damage has been done to the American economy? And can the US medical and pharmaceutical sectors come up with a cure for COVID-19? In addition, US foreign policy has been a factor in the crisis, as it offered an expression of how America was able to give a reason for what happened (President Donald Trump’s labeling of coronavirus as “the Chinese virus”) and why such tough measures had been taken (to help nations avoid even more catastrophic consequences).
Economic suffering and how it conflicts with public health obligations have complicated life in the majority of nations in the world. The leaders of many nations, from Brazil to Europe and the Middle East, found themselves in a similar position to Trump, in that they had to take these measures to mollify the damaging impact of an intractable global health crisis. While Trump uses a tone of self-defense for having to order a national shutdown, many other leaders also used self-justification in their apologies for having to assume these unpopular policies. Their safest language was to repeat what Trump said: That it is a virus that originated in China and that these hated policies derive from the necessity to save lives.
The coronavirus will not affect America’s foreign policy in terms of charting a new path in the world, but rather by giving rise to a new attitude. The virus will not abolish the crises of Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Ethiopia-Egypt, Russia-Ukraine, and other hotspots. Its legacy and influence on world diplomacy will be that it revved up the idea of cooperation among nations to solve such problems. Positively, the Trump administration sounds more responsive to diplomatic openings to solve these problems, but it will not submit initiatives toward their resolution.
Trump learned some hard lessons. When he presented his plan to end the Arab-Israeli conflict and when he ordered the withdrawal of US troops from Syria, he found out that the former proposal was quickly rejected and that some in the Pentagon were not wholeheartedly supportive of the latter. Therefore, he will let others formulate diplomatic ideas as the starting points of future peace plans. He is still tempted by the allure of a deal to denuclearize North Korea — ideally a few days before the November presidential election — and he would also welcome, for example, a Gulf Cooperation Council announcement of a plan for Iraq to counter Iran, or President Vladimir Putin trying to coordinate the work of Russia’s troops in Syria with the UN and US. Personally, he would approve of such diplomatic gambits.
Perhaps the global ordeal can be a self-fulfilling prophecy for Trump’s desire to find a working relationship with Putin; allowing them to change many of the geopolitical realities associated with these conflicts. For instance, if both Trump and Putin wanted to curb the ambitions of Iran and Turkey, they could work together to implement policies in Syria and Iraq that could help achieve this.
Trump’s ultimate strategic goal is to contain China. He now moves on the world stage more by instinct than by his convictions, and the clearest indication of this is his sense that, since the coronavirus outbreak started in China, Beijing’s appeal is now less compelling to many than it was previously. Many in America and around the world view China as a nation that cannot evade important questions about its domestic situation.
Its legacy and influence on world diplomacy will be that it revved up the idea of cooperation among nations.
This crisis could produce valuable results for future US foreign policy. Foremost is how to establish a minimum degree of consensus on some basics of international relations. This will surely include more investment and coordination over creating a global public health care infrastructure. Trump is not a fan or the World Health Organization, accusing it of bias toward some countries — a clear insinuation of China — and he threatened to cut US funding for it. But, if there was an idea to create global and regional funds to support health care in poor countries, this could lead to more US, European and Canadian attention to augmenting weak health care systems around the world, especially with the need for an early warning system for epidemics.
Hopefully the coronavirus pandemic will also allow the world to utilize a growing motivation in Washington and other capitals to stop regional crises such as the one in Syria from being prolonged into endemic wider strategic dilemmas.
*Maria Maalouf is a Lebanese journalist, broadcaster, publisher, and writer. She holds an MA in Political Sociology from the University of Lyon. Twitter: @bilarakib

Global unity key to tackling the coronavirus pandemic
Dr. Mohammed Al-Sulami/Arab News/April 13/2020
In light of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, think tanks worldwide are working to study the spread of the virus and global attempts to combat it. In this context, a virtual symposium was held last week, bringing together distinguished figures from organizations around the world. It was organized by the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania. About 300 researchers and chief executives representing 170 institutes from 65 different countries participated in the symposium. Among the participants was the International Institute for Iranian Studies (Rasanah).
Over the past two months, the economic and social fallouts of the virus have been clearly apparent worldwide. Resolving this health crisis depends on the discovery of a vaccine that totally destroys COVID-19 — otherwise its role will be limited to lowering the number of deaths and easing the pressure on health systems.
This pandemic could impact think tanks, especially their work environment, research streams and financing. Due to lockdowns and curfews in cities around the world, think tanks are not currently able to hold workshops, conferences and open discussion forums. This is in addition to a decline in their ability to regulate work timings, which will, of course, affect productivity.
For these reasons, one solution could be to create a virtual work environment that enables the members of think tanks to communicate during their working hours and talk during specific periods of the day. This is in addition to organizing conferences and workshops via videoconferencing technology and supporting information technology teams to ensure such activities run as smoothly as possible.
With regard to the impact of the virus on research streams, it is expected that there will be a shift in research focus. Also, while it is probable that conventional armed conflicts will see a slowdown, it is likely that virtual and cyberattacks will surge. It is also expected that human activities that depend on mobility, huge public gatherings, tourism and travel will also see a decline. Therefore, think tanks should focus on the impact of this virus on the nature of human activities and how societies are likely to adapt and survive in the age of COVID-19.
This is in addition to a need to measure the changes happening to human behavior, beliefs and ideas in light of the impact of the virus on established ideologies and belief systems. There should also be studies on how the virus has impacted key economic sectors, such as tourism and aviation, as well as the socioeconomic consequences of the virus, such as unemployment, declining incomes, and a potential rise in crime and social disorder.
On financing, it is to be expected that the ability of think tanks to finance themselves will weaken in the coming period. Hence, there is a need for them to address this challenge by maximizing resources and lowering expenditures. Think tanks must study the financial packages introduced by policymakers to see whether they can apply for funds to compensate for the decline in their private financing sources. This is in addition to scaling down office space and cutting administrative jobs concerned with running and regulating the physical work environment, which has now become virtual in most cases.
For this reason, I suggest that think tanks should fine tune their human resources on a short-term basis and discuss with experts the possible solutions to the aforementioned challenges. This is in addition to providing suggestions and policy papers to decision-makers that could be useful in resolving some of the problems caused by COVID-19.
Part of their budgets should be reallocated to recruit volunteers and researchers to devise low-cost, practical applications that help communities overcome the obstacles they face during this period of crisis.
Think tanks should focus on the impact of this virus on the nature of human activities.
During this critical period, think tanks should also play a proactive role in providing morale-boosting services to society and be supported financially to allow them to accomplish their respective missions.
As Saudi Arabia is hosting the G20 summit in November, the T20 — an international think tank network — will play a critical role in providing much-needed policy advice to member countries. Thus, we believe that Saudi think tanks need to work together to devise initiatives, ideas and proposals to enrich the G20 summit. These should then be shared with other think tanks worldwide to enable an exchange of views on the pandemic and to come up with proposals to contribute to curbing the disease. This strategy will also contribute to rendering the Kingdom’s hosting of the summit successful, creating a qualitative transformation in the work of the T20, developing its tools, and increasing its responsibility.
*Dr. Mohammed Al-Sulami is Head of the International Institute for Iranian Studies (Rasanah). Twitter: @mohalsulami

‘Useful idiots’ damaging search for truth in Syria
Chris Doyle/Arab News/April 13/2020
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19), chemical weapons, nerve agents and 9/11 — one thing links all of these dreadful elements. They all fuel an industry that grows and metastasizes like the most virulent pandemic: The world of conspiracy theories. An array of fringe academics, so-called journalists and activists, aided by social media bots and trolls, avail themselves of every opportunity to spread the most creative and dangerous confections with threadbare arguments that serve to question reality and faith in major institutions. These “useful idiots” typically become the willing dupes and echo chambers of Russian propaganda, for example, to advance the most pernicious of agendas.
All of this was in sharp focus last Wednesday, when the international chemical weapons watchdog, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) published its latest report into chemical weapons use in Syria. For the first time, the OPCW specifically attributed blame for a chemical weapons attack to the Syrian regime. In the past, it had lacked the authority to do so, but this changed after the organization was given additional powers in 2018.
This new Investigation and Identification Team (IIT) determined that the Syrian regime bore responsibility for several incidents at Ltamenah in Hama province in March 2017, which included the use of sarin gas and chlorine. Its report stated: “The IIT has concluded that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the perpetrators of the use of sarin as a chemical weapon in Ltamenah on 24 and 30 March 2017, and the use of chlorine as a chemical weapon on 25 March 2017 were individuals belonging to the Syrian Arab Air Force.” The report gives copious details, not least the movement of key Syrian personnel, forces and, crucially, planes.
One “truther” felt vindicated by the phrase “reasonable grounds to believe,” insisting that “disbelief” was, therefore, also “not unreasonable.” This preposterous piece of quackery makes a false equivalence between “reasonable grounds to believe,” which indicates a high benchmark of evidence, and disbelief.
That said, the OPCW must not escape proper scrutiny. The investigation into the Douma incident of April 7, 2018, has caused controversy, not least allegations from whistleblowers. All this must be cleared up by an impartial assessment. Doubts persist about that particular incident, but this does not exonerate the regime from the other incidents where the evidence is overwhelming.
Three things stand out from the whole issue of chemical weapons use in Syria. Firstly, until 2013, the Syrian regime denied that Damascus had any chemical weapons. This was the greatest lie of all. When the Syrian regime was finally compelled to sign up to the Chemical Weapons Convention, its years of gratuitous lies and falsehoods were exposed as it coughed up 1,300 tons of VX nerve agents, sarin and mustard gas for destruction. This did not cause any questioning at all among the truthers. The Syrian regime had been caught red-handed with this monstrous arsenal. With this, it was implicitly acknowledged that Damascus had committed the August 2013 chemical weapons attack on Ghouta that killed hundreds.
Secondly, the Syrian regime could have cooperated with the OPCW investigations, not least if it was innocent. It did not. By failing to grant the inspectors full and immediate access to the locations, no report can be utterly conclusive, which the regime plays on.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, the Syrian regime has bombed and killed far more innocent civilians with conventional weapons than with chemical attacks. The world has failed to stop this. Needless to say, the useful idiots just ignore these blatant regime crimes. These conventional attacks alone are enough to justify war crimes commissions and trials. Moreover, if there is a temptation for the opposition to mount false flag exercises — as some allege — it is because they have realized that it is only chemical weapons use that gets the world to take notice.
That the IIT report was published during the maelstrom of the coronavirus pandemic is hugely fortunate for the Syrian regime. The media did cover the report, but far less comprehensively than it would have done in normal times.
This cannot be said for the useful idiots. Many of those who question the Syrian chemical weapons attacks are the same people who push baseless conspiracy theories about COVID-19 being a biological weapon, or that it is just a low-fatality virus little different to the flu. One asked in an interview, “Is coronavirus the new 9/11?” — spreading nonsense on both the pandemic and the 2001 terror attacks on the US.
Some of the worst offenders are ensconced in universities, not least in Britain, and involved in a shady outfit known as the “Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media.” Serious questions must be asked about their academic credentials, not least as they put their names to articles on issues in which they have no expertise.
Many of those who question the Syrian chemical weapons attacks are the same people who push baseless conspiracy theories about COVID-19.
The damage such nonsense does is extraordinary. It serves to undermine leading expert institutions in a muck-throwing exercise that causes sections of the general public to question basic reality. Hard evidence is refashioned as dubious and objective realities questioned in an industrial gaslighting exercise. The evidence that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons is overwhelming, as is the evidence that Russian agents used Novichok in Salisbury in 2018 and polonium in London in 2006. Yet this is never enough for such characters.
All these institutions, including the OPCW, must be held to account and compelled to maintain the highest of standards, but that process cannot continue if a miasma of confusion and fakery is deliberately deployed in an attempt to bring the whole edifice down.
*Chris Doyle is director of the London-based Council for Arab-British Understanding. Twitter: @Doylech

Russia-Saudi ties will only be stronger after the pandemic
Kirill Dmitriev/Arab News/April 13/2020
Russia and Saudi Arabia have once again led the way for other countries by agreeing a major oil output reduction deal that will stabilize energy markets and help the global economy in the face of the recession triggered by the coronavirus pandemic.
Many other oil-producing countries, including the US, supported this agreement at the meeting of G20 energy ministers chaired by Saudi Arabia. This is a great example of the kind of leadership and partnership needed in these turbulent times, when the pandemic is already having a major impact on the lives of billions of people worldwide.
Without this agreement, oil prices could have plunged to below $10 per barrel due to an unprecedented demand shock. This could have had a devastating effect on global economies.
At this crucial moment, our countries managed to put aside their differences, work together, find a solution and convince others to join this agreement.
Russia and Saudi Arabia have already come a very long way together. Only a few years ago, our relationship was almost nonexistent and we knew very little about each other. However, since the first visit of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to St. Petersburg and his first meeting with President Vladimir Putin in 2015, our countries have made a giant leap forward and achieved visible results.
The OPEC+ agreement to stabilize oil prices, which has been in place since 2016, was a major contribution to global economic growth by Russia and Saudi Arabia.
Together with our partner, Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) has invested more than $2.5 billion in over 30 projects. We are now working with PIF, Saudi Aramco, SABIC and other Saudi partners on 25 new investment projects in sectors such as petrochemicals, infrastructure, agriculture, and technology.
The RDIF has supported the breakthrough in our relationship with Saudi Arabia in every key area and has become the main partner for the Kingdom’s companies in Russia. We have also supported bilateral cultural events and cooperation between media groups.
Most importantly, we have developed trust between our nations. The recent developments have shown that this trust and partnership have survived despite the global turbulence and different tactical approaches.
I have personally enjoyed traveling to Saudi Arabia in recent years. I love visiting the ancient site of AlUla, the pristine coast of the Red Sea and the gleaming office buildings in Riyadh. Many Saudis have become my close friends and I deeply regret not being able to see them at the moment because of the pandemic.
At this crucial moment, our countries managed to put aside their differences, work together, find a solution and convince others to join this agreement.
We saw the number of Russian tourists in Saudi Arabia grow very quickly last year after the decision to open the Kingdom’s hidden treasures up to international visitors. These achievements should not be forgotten. Instead, we should build on them and look forward.
Trust and continued partnership between our countries can help us successfully combat the pandemic and speed up the return to a normal world with international travel and face-to-face business meetings. Russia and Saudi Arabia can do a lot together to achieve this.
Our doctors, scientists and businessmen can work together to find a vaccine and share available information about clinical research and best practices. For example, we at the RDIF believe that the quickest way to reopen the global economy lies through extensive testing of not only people with symptoms, but also all those who could potentially be infected.
In our view, this is the most effective strategy. Russia and Saudi Arabia can join forces now to implement this strategy. Together with our partners, we have found the best available testing technologies and invested in some of the most accurate, fast and mobile testing systems in the world.
The use of these systems can exponentially increase the number of tests. They are now being rolled out in Russia, the US, the UAE, Austria and many other countries. We are already working with Saudi researchers to bring these testing systems to the Kingdom.
This is further proof that partnerships and a coordinated global response are key to the imminent victory over this pandemic. We believe that this global emergency will bring Russia and Saudi Arabia even closer to each other and make our partnership even stronger.
*Kirill Dmitriev is CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund.

Coronavirus Should Finally Smash the Barriers to Telemedicine
Virginia Postrel/Bloomberg/Monday, 13 April, 2020
Under normal circumstances, internist Jenni Levy makes house calls, checking on patients with chronic conditions and serving as what she calls “rolling urgent care.” She works for Landmark Health, which offers supplemental home visits to people with Medicare Advantage plans and a high risk of hospitalization.
When she joined Landmark, Levy heard that the company was working on a telemedicine app. Two and a half years later, she still hadn’t seen anything. It turns out developing proprietary software that complies with the privacy provisions of the US’s Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, better known as HIPAA, is a time-consuming process. So far, the company has pilot programs running in only a couple of markets.
Now, with circumstances far from normal, Levy and her colleagues are suddenly seeing patients over FaceTime and WhatsApp. In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, federal regulators last month eased the stringent interpretation of HIPAA for telemedicine. Rather than special HIPAA-compliant platforms, health-care providers operating in good faith can use everyday communications tools, so long as they aren’t open to the public.
FaceTime is fine, in other words; Tik Tok is not. The changes, says Levy, a college friend of mine, “enabled us to start doing something we’d been intending to do all along.”
Until recently, telemedicine seemed like one of those technological promises that was always in the future. While it sounded good in theory, it confronted economic barriers, regulatory hurdles and resistance from doctors and patients.
Covid-19 has radically changed the environment. For all its horrors, the pandemic provides an opportunity to cut through some of the red tape that stymies medical progress. To keep patients out of waiting rooms and limit the spread of the disease, physicians, insurers, and state and federal regulators are pushing the rapid expansion of technologies once confined to niches and optimistic press releases. In the US, regulatory barriers have fallen, reimbursement rates have risen and skeptical physicians are getting comfortable with video consultations.
Doctors, patients and businesses are having to change the way they think about telemedicine. If we learn the right lessons and avoid reverting to the status quo ante once Covid-19 is brought under control, the result could be better care at lower costs — without eroding the already shaky finances of primary-care physicians.
Take the relaxation of those HIPAA rules. When the privacy law was passed by Congress in 1996, nobody was thinking about how it would apply to FaceTime visits. We were living in the world of fax machines, letters and phone calls — the technologies HIPAA still favors absent a crisis. The emergency response reveals just how ill-founded the restrictions are. Letting doctors use widely available, even free, software to examine patients at a distance vastly expands the number of practices that can incorporate telemedicine. You no longer have to be a large organization capable of building or buying a specialized system. You don’t have to make telemedicine the backbone of your practice, hiring crews of nurse practitioners to take calls from around the country. You can be a small clinic that wants to offer an occasional convenience to regular patients who are too sick or located too far away to easily come to the office.
That, in turn, changes the political economy of the concept. Many primary-care physicians have resisted telemedicine, supporting state restrictions that limit its scope. They justifiably feared that virtual consultations could skim off their profitable cases and put them out of business. If even small practices can offer online visits, however, telemedicine becomes a way of expanding care and potentially increasing income. It’s cheap and convenient but no longer a substitute for an ongoing relationship with a primary-care physician.
But if regulators later demand a return to the old rules on telemedicine platforms, warns Grady Gibbs, a technology consultant who admits he’s self-interested, since his clients are primary-care practices, “that will kill telemedicine — not kill it dead, but it will make the rollout much, much more difficult because the small, especially independent, PCP office — one doc, maybe one doctor and a mid-level — is not going to be able to go out there and get access to a good platform that's HIPAA-compliant.”
Regulation isn’t the only barrier to widespread telemedicine. “The single biggest thing that probably has held back deployment is, as is often the case, reimbursement,” says Steve Spearman, senior director with Huron Consulting Group, who specializes in health-care issues. Here, too, the current crisis has changed the status quo. Medicare, which used to pay a much lower rate for telemedicine when it reimbursed it at all, is now covering a wide range of telemedicine services at the same reimbursement rates as in-person offerings. Private insurers are following, voluntarily or by demand from state regulators.
That equal treatment likely won’t continue once the pandemic passes, but it sets a precedent for how to think about telemedicine: It doesn’t have to be a quick, cheap and transient service offered by companies without bricks-and-mortar investments in local clinics. It could also serve as an addition to primary care, especially for patients with chronic conditions — if reimbursement rates reflect clinic overhead.
Gibbs makes an analogy to how restaurants and bars are regulated differently depending on whether serving alcohol is their primary business or an adjunct to it. Doctors who offer telemedicine to existing patients as a convenience could get higher reimbursements, he suggests, while “if you operate the big call center, then maybe your reimbursement is just dirt cheap. And it becomes something that only gets used in the off-hours” or perhaps by patients without primary-care doctors. “That to me would be a great way to thread the needle, because you’ve got to protect the family practitioner.” We don’t want local doctors to disappear — or to fight the advance of new technologies.

British Conservatives are Shifting Further to the Right

Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al Awsat/April 13/2020
Two names have come to the fore of British politics in recent times: Keir Starmer, who was elected leader of the Labor Party, succeeding Jeremy Corbyn, and Dominic Raab, who assumed leadership of the government and the Conservative Party after Boris Johnson became sick with the coronavirus. In the event of things getting worse for the latter, Raab will maintain those two positions. In the event of his recovery, Raab would have solidified his position as his number two.
In the meantime, and going back to abundant literature that has been written about the “interim” leader, we can be sure of one thing: he is a Thatcherite cub. The Guardian described him as more rightwing on education than Thatcher; indeed, he is famous for, among other things, inviting companies to manage public schools: his Laborite critics commented: he is going to privatize what was not privatized by Thatcher. His supporters called him: ''the male Margret Thatcher''.
Dominic Raab was born in April 1974, so he belongs to the generation of conservatives that entered public life during the era in which the ''Iron Lady'' was the star. On April 9 2013, the day after she died, this is some of what he said in his eulogy in the House of Commons: “Margaret Thatcher was our greatest post-war leader. She rescued the UK economy from debilitating socialism, defended British democracy from a despotic military junta and helped win the Cold War.” Some of those who admire his Thatcherism add having "the discipline of an athlete" to his list of qualities; for Raab carries a black belt in karate.
He is originally from a wealthy area in southeast England (Buckinghamshire) which borders Greater London. He comes from a family imbedded in commerce: his father (a Jew whose family fled from the former Czechoslovakia in 1938) was a manager in Marks and Spencer's food department. His mother worked in the clothing industry, and his Brazilian wife Erika Rey is an executive marketing manager.
Young Dominic studied in one of the elite “grammar schools”. As a youth, he went to Oxford, where he graduated with a degree in law, and he later continued his studies in Cambridge.
Upon graduating, he worked at one of Britain’s most prestigious law firms, Linklaters, founded in 1838 and belonged to the “golden circle” of law firms. Some 2,800 lawyers across more than 20 countries currently work there.
As for the electoral district that he has been representing since 2010, it is Esher and Walton in the affluent Surrey County, a very safe Conservative seat. His representation has persisted uninterrupted since then, defeating his competitors by large margins.
Raab worked as a consultant before becoming an MP. The government and international institutions often consulted him on financial issues and litigation (as did the Palestine Liberation Organization regarding the implementation of the Oslo agreement). This role granted him the status of a cold technocrat, someone who leans towards reducing situations to numbers, putting some ice on his hot ideological makeup.
His name shined with Brexit, especially during the dispute with the European Union regarding withdrawal, for he is an enthusiastic Brexiter; Theresa May appointed him Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. He resigned after four months, earning his title as one of the most extreme hardliners. He helped push May to step down, then ran for Conservative Party leadership after her resignation in May 2019, presenting himself as more radical than Boris Johnson. He could not garner a substantial number of votes, so he pledged his allegiance to Johnson who promoted him to the position he now holds, Foreign Secretary, and appointed him deputy.
Among the other opinions that Raab was famous for: foreign policy should further the national interest, getting involved in external disputes should be avoided if possible; aid should go to the poorest countries; free trade should be championed. Human rights are good, and he was consulted previously on bringing war criminals to The Hague by the International Court of Justice, but these rights should not affect Britain's relationships with countries that accrue economic benefits and create employment opportunities. He supports strict scrutiny of the records of asylum seekers to Britain, the government's right to prevent them from getting visas in case of violations and to confiscate their property if they have any. Foreign prisoners sentenced to one year or longer are to be deported unless they might be tortured in their countries. The European Union is defamed as a corrupt and wasteful institution. Private companies should be encouraged to invest in the National Health Service in addition to public education. The 45 percent tax rate on the highest incomes should be lowered. All government spending elicits extreme reluctance. A strike of workers in emergency and transportation services must be approved by 50 percent of union workers. Discrimination against women is a hoax; indeed, it is men who are discriminated against. Feminists are heretics.
Overall, we are facing inclinations to the right of those of Margaret Thatcher. However, the question being asked sternly today: is it possible, with those ideas, to rule Britain after the coronavirus and the economic crisis and poverty triggered by it?
Even before Covid-19, Medicare had changed its reimbursement policies to encourage a particularly promising form of telemedicine: regularly monitoring patients with chronic conditions, including diabetes, hypertension and congestive heart failure. In 2018, a primary-care doctor who sent a patient home with equipment to take regular readings had to personally spend 30 minutes a month going over results with the patient to receive reimbursement from Medicare, which paid nothing for the equipment. And the monthly payment was a paltry $59. “No doctor is going to do 30 minutes of their own time, plus capital equipment, to make $59,” says Gibbs. “So there was no adoption.”
In 2019, however, Medicare changed its policy. In industry jargon, it “unbundled the code,” offering a one-time setup fee and a monthly equipment-rental reimbursement averaging $66 nationally. It also allowed doctors to delegate the monthly checkups to staff and cut the time required to 20 minutes. “We go from 59 bucks for 30 minutes of the doctor's time to $52 for 20 minutes of the staff’s time, plus the 60-something for the equipment itself,” says Gibbs. That made the idea profitable for primary-care practices.
Starting this year, the doctor can hire a third party to analyze the data and alert the practice of any warning signs. The result is significantly greater adoption of telemedicine. Instead of measuring blood pressure twice a year during in-person checkups, for instance, patients take their readings every day. Down the road, wearable technology will make it possible to continuously monitor at-risk patients. “The world that we’re headed to,” says Gibbs, “is your PCP is going to know what’s going on with your health 24/7 and will then only intervene when there’s a problem.”
Gibbs, whose firm analyzes data for doctors and makes money by renting them the monitoring equipment, recounts the recent experience of training a small practice that brought in 10 patients to set up with monitors. Three of them turned out to have such high readings that the nurse immediately walked them back to see the doctor. One man’s systolic blood pressure reading topped 200, where 120 is considered normal. “He was four months away from his next office visit,” says Gibbs. “So what happens to him in the next four months? He strokes out. He passes out, falls, breaks a hip because of the high blood pressure.” Telemonitoring allows early detection of changes that might otherwise lead to hospitalization. That saves both lives and money.
By forcing doctors to think about how to best serve patients remotely, Covid-19 has encouraged greater adoption of telemonitoring. It has also taught patients who would never have used online services, such as Dr. Levy’s elderly clientele, how to reach their doctors remotely. When the crisis is over and in-person visits are again easy to manage, these habits will remain. With the right regulation and reimbursement policies, telemedicine can become a normal part of regular health care in the United States — a complement rather than a substitute for hands-on practice.

IMF Must Not Buy the Mullahs' Coronavirus Lies
Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/April 13, 2020
The U.S. Embassy wrote in a Facebook post: "The possessions of the current supreme leader Ali #Khamenei alone are estimated at $200 billion, while many people languish in poverty because of the dire economic situation in #Iran after 40 years of rule by the mullahs."
If the Iranian leaders are so concerned about the public health, why they have been ratcheting up their use of lethal force, suppression and human rights abuses against those who have been revealing the truth about the COVID-19 virus in Iran or who have been voicing their concern about the regime's mishandling of the coronavirus crisis?
"The world's leading state sponsor of terrorism is seeking cash to fund its adventurism abroad, not to buy medicine for Iranians. The regime's corrupt officials have a long history of diverting funds allocated for humanitarian goods into their own pockets and to their terrorist proxies." — U.S. State Department Spokesman to CNN, April 9, 2020.
The ruling mullahs of Iran are doubling down on requests to the International Monetary Fund immediately to give Tehran an emergency $5 billion loan. Pictured: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.
The ruling mullahs of Iran are doubling down on requests to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), headquartered in Washington DC, immediately to give Tehran an emergency $5 billion loan.
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani stated that his government wants to use the $5 billion fund to fight the coronavirus pandemic, and stressed once again, "I urge international organizations to fulfill their duties ... We are a member of the IMF." The IMF, however, should definitely decline the mullahs' financial request, because the ruling mullahs have plenty of cash and that they would most likely misuse the funds to advance their anti-American and anti-Semitic -- and even anti-Iranian people -- agendas.
Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, for instance, the unelected "representative of God on earth" and the longest-ruling autocrat in the Middle East, has a financial empire worth at least $95 billion, according to a report published by Reuters in 2013.
According to the most recent estimate, the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad estimated Khamenei's wealth as worth nearly $200 billion. The U.S. Embassy wrote in a Facebook post:
"The possessions of the current supreme leader Ali #Khamenei alone are estimated at $200 billion, while many people languish in poverty because of the dire economic situation in #Iran after 40 years of rule by the mullahs."
One of Khamenei's major organizations, Setad (short for Setade Ejraiye Farmane Emam meaning "The Executive Headquarters of Imam's Directive"), is worth at least $95 billion. Roughly half its holdings are invested in the corporate field and the other half in real estate, mainly through "the systematic seizure of thousands of properties belonging to ordinary Iranians" according to Reuters. In 2013, the EU sanctioned the president of Setad, Mohammad Mokhber, for involvement in "nuclear or ballistic missile activities." The United States Department of the Treasury called Setad a "massive network of front companies".
Also, if the Iranian leaders are so concerned about the public' health, why they have been ratcheting up their use of lethal force, suppression and human rights abuses against those who have been revealing the truth about the COVID-19 virus in Iran or who have been voicing their concern about the regime's mishandling of the coronavirus crisis? Recently, approximately 36 prisoners in Iran were reportedly killed by the regime's security forces for protesting over their fears of contracting COVID-19 virus. According to a recent report by Amnesty International:
"In recent days, thousands of prisoners in at least eight prisons around the country have staged protests over fears of contracting the coronavirus, sparking deadly responses from prison officers and security forces. In several prisons, live ammunition and tear gas were used to suppress protests, killing around 35 prisoners and injuring hundreds of others, according to credible sources. In at least one prison, security forces beat those taking part in the protest action, possibly leading to the death of an inmate."
The IMF really should not provide funds to a regime that is both the "world's worst state sponsor of terrorism" and the world's leading executioner and torturer of children. Some of the children who have been executed are as young as 12. Iran's Sharia Penal Code allows girls as young as 9 and boys as young as 15 to be executed. Vague charges -- such as "waging war against God," spreading moharebeh ("corruption on earth"), protesting, or "endangering the country's national security" -- are generally brought up by the Islamic Republic's judiciary system or the Revolutionary Court.
If the IMF grants the Iranian regime billions of dollars, the "world's worst state sponsor of terrorism" will most likely spend the funds on supporting, arming and finance proxies and terror groups across the region to attack Americans and their allies and further destabilize the region. As a US State Department spokesperson in the Trump Administration recently said:
"The world's leading state sponsor of terrorism is seeking cash to fund its adventurism abroad, not to buy medicine for Iranians. The regime's corrupt officials have a long history of diverting funds allocated for humanitarian goods into their own pockets and to their terrorist proxies."
The State Department official added, accurately:
"Iranians themselves know this best, which is why many dissidents and former political prisoners have written to the IMF requesting that they deny providing direct financial support to the regime, which would not go to help the Iranian people."
An official from the US Department of Treasury noted:
"The United States is aware of Iran's request for financing from the IMF and, as in the past, we remain opposed to funding going to Iran that could be used to foster the regime's malign and destabilizing activities. Unfortunately, the Iranian central bank, which is currently under sanction, has been a key actor in financing terrorism across the region and we have no confidence that funds would be used to fight the coronavirus."
The IMF must not buy the mullahs' coronavirus lies; if the funds are given to the ruling mullahs of Iran, the last place the funds will be used is fighting COVID-19 virus.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on Islam and US foreign policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu
© 2020 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Coronavirus: A French Disaster
Guy Millière/Gatestone Institute/April 13, 2020
The first bad decision was that, in contrast to the European Union fantasies, borders apparently do matter. France never closed them; instead it allowed large numbers of potential virus-carriers to enter the country.
In January 2020, several hundred thousand masks were available, but on February 19, President Macron decoded to send them to Wuhan, as a "gesture of solidarity with the Chinese people".... The French government announced that masks would be available soon, but by the end of March, most doctors and caregivers still had no masks. Several doctors fell ill. As of April 10, eight have died from COVID-19 and several others are in critical condition. On March 20, the Government's spokeswoman, Sibeth N'Diaye, incorrectly said, "masks are essentially useless".
On February 25, a renowned French epidemiologist, Professor Didier Raoult... published a video... In it, he said he had found a treatment quickly to end the pandemic: hydroxychloroquine... (used with azithromycin)... On April 10, Professor Raoult published data showing that he had treated and cured 2,401 patients.
Immediately, Olivier Veran, the new French minister of health, said that Professor Raoult's statements were "unacceptable" and that the treatment he was proposing was "worthless".... In an attempt to quell the controversy, the French government, by decree, authorized Professor Raoult's treatment in "military hospitals" for "patients reaching the acute phase of the disease" but prohibited family doctors from prescribing hydroxychloroquine. Professor Raoult replied that the treatment was only effective if administered "before the disease reaches its acute phase". [Emphasis added]
France's mainstream media would do well to fight harder for physicians to be able supply hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin and zinc sulfate. The French media would also do well to be more aware of the dirty game China is playing.
"The behavior of our leaders has been marked by unpreparedness, casualness, cynicism, and many of their acts imply the enforcement of the criminal law. Deliberate endangerment of the lives of others and failure to provide assistance to people in danger are obvious... In war, generals who are judged incompetent are sometimes shot. The President and other officials are well aware of this." — Regis de Castelnau, attorney, in Marianne, a center-left magazine, April 4, 2020.
In contrast to European Union fantasies, borders apparently do matter. France never closed them; instead it allowed large numbers of potential coronavirus-carriers to enter the country. Pictured: A French policeman uses a drone to check the surroundings of the German-French border in Strasbourg, France, on April 9, 2020. (Photo by Frederick Florin / AFP via Getty Images)
On April 9, in France, one of the three European countries most affected by COVID-19 -- the others being Spain and Italy, 1,341 people died from the Chinese Communist Party virus. For Italy, the main European country affected so far, the figure on April 9 was 610 deaths; for Spain 446, and for Germany 266. While the pandemic has been stabilizing in Italy and Spain -- and in Germany seems contained -- in France it seems still expanding.
Extremely bad decisions taken by the authorities created a situation of contagion more destructive than it should have been.
The first bad decision was that, in contrast to European Union fantasies, borders apparently do matter. France never closed them; instead it allowed large numbers of potential virus-carriers to enter the country. Even when it became clear that in Italy the pandemic was taking on catastrophic proportions, France's border with Italy remained open. The Italian government, by contrast, on March 10, prohibited French people coming to its territory or Italians going to France, but to date, France has put no controls on its side of the border.
The situation is the same on France's border with Spain, despite the terrifying situation there. Since March 17, it has been virtually impossible to go from France to Spain, but coming to France from Spain is easy: you just show a police officer your ID. The same goes for France's border with Germany. On March 16, Germany closed its border with France, but France declined to do the same for its border with Germany. When, on February 26, a soccer match between a French team and an Italian team took place in Lyon, the third-largest city in France, 3,000 Italian supporters attended, even though patients were already flocking to Italy's hospitals.
France never closed its airports; they are still open to "nationals of EEA Member States, Switzerland, passengers with a British passport, and those with residence permits issued by France" and healthcare professionals. Earlier, until the last days of March, people arriving from China were not even subject to health checks. French people in Wuhan, the city where the pandemic originated, were repatriated by a military plane, and, upon their arrival in France, were placed in quarantine. While Air France interrupted its flights to China on January 30, Chinese and other airlines departing from Shanghai and Beijing continue to land in France.
French President Emmanuel Macron summarized France's official position on the practice: "Viruses do not have passports," he said. Members of the French government repeated the same dogma. A few commentators reminded them that viruses travel with infected people, who can be stopped at borders, and that borders are essential to stop or slow the spread of a disease, but the effort was useless. Macron ended up saying that the borders of the Schengen area (26 European states that have officially abolished all passport and border control with one another) could not be shut down and raged at other European leaders for reintroducing border checks between the Schengen area member countries. "What is at stake," he said, seemingly more concerned with the "European project" than with the lives of millions of people, "is the survival of the European project."
Other bad decisions the disastrous management of the means of fighting the pandemic.
In early March, when people in large numbers started to arrive ill at hospitals, doctors and caregivers warned that they did not have enough masks and said that working without any protective equipment put them at high risk. Journalists quickly discovered that in 2013, France had possessed a reserve of several million masks, but that the government had decided to destroy them to reduce storage costs. In January 2020, a few hundred thousand masks were still available, but on February 19, President Macron decided to send them to Wuhan, as a "gesture of solidarity with the Chinese people".
The French government then announced that masks would be available soon, but by the end of March, most doctors and caregivers still had no masks. Several doctors fell ill. As of April 10, eight have died from COVID-19 and several others are in critical condition. On March 20, the government's spokeswoman, Sibeth N'Diaye, incorrectly said that "masks are essentially useless".
At the end of February, France had almost no tests available, and no means of manufacturing them. The government decided to buy tests from China, but by March 19, the number of tests was still insufficient. While Germany performed 500,000 screening tests per week, France was only able to only perform 50,000.
Rather than admit that tests were unavailable, or that the government had mismanaged situation, the France's minister of health, Olivier Veran, announced that large-scale screening was useless, and that France had chosen to "proceed differently".
Municipal elections, scheduled for March 15, took place despite the virus and despite the fact that many doctors warned that polling stations were places of contagion. Sure enough, in the days that followed, hundreds of people in charge of polling stations flocked to the hospitals. On March 16, President Macron delivered a speech declaring that "France is at war" and that on the following day, March 17, France would be placed on lockdown.
Lockdown is still in place and the French government has decided to extend it indefinitely. The rules are strict. The French can only leave home, within a radius of one kilometer, for one hour a day, to buy food, and must have written authorization to present to the police who patrol the streets. Anyone who is on a street without authorization is fined 135 euros ($145) the first time, 1,500 euros ($1,630) the second time, and after three offenses, can be subject to a sentence of six months in prison. Any meeting with a person not sharing the same place of lockdown is prohibited.
Most of the population has complied, except in the no-go zones. The police have been ordered to turn a blind eye to what happens there. The no-go zone in Seine Saint Denis, for instance, has a fatality rate 63% higher than in the rest of the country.
It was not exactly a secret that before the pandemic that the French economy had also not been doing that well. Growth was barely above zero and unemployment high. Now, the French economy has effectively stopped. It is hard to imagine what the situation will be after the pandemic.
Now, almost all the French hospitals are full; patients wait on beds in the halls. On March 18, France had only 5,000 ventilators, so "triage" procedures began: some patients survived, others, for lack of treatment, did not.
A scandal erupted. Agnes Buzyn -- who was Minister of Health until February 16, then a candidate for mayor of Paris; then, on March 15, defeated -- said on March 18: "I knew a tsunami [presumably meaning a deadly pandemic] was going to hit France". She added that she had told everything to President Macron in January. Immediately, Marine Le Pen, President of the National Rally, the main opposition party in France, said that "by staying silent about a worrying situation, Agnes Buzyn behaved in an unconscionable manner". Le Pen added, "if Agnes Buzyn is speaking the truth, the government and President Macron have seriously failed in their duties, and the case will have to be brought before a Court of Justice".
Another scandal, however, even more important, had erupted before that. On February 25, a celebrated French epidemiologist, Professor Didier Raoult, President of the Marseille University Hospital Institute for Infectious Diseases (Méditerranée Infection), one of the main European research centers on epidemics and pandemics, published a video, "Coronavirus: Towards a way out of the crisis". In it, he said that he had found a treatment to infected people quickly: hydroxychloroquine (a drug used against malaria since 1949) and azithromycin (a commonly used antibiotic), that had already cured 24 patients.
Immediately, Olivier Veran, the new French minister of health, said that Professor Raoult's statements were "unacceptable". A harsh medical and political battle began. Many doctors close to President Macron agreed with Veran and denounced Raoult. Some even claimed he was a "charlatan", apparently forgetting that, until then, Professor Raoult had been considered by many France's most prestigious epidemiologist. Other doctors said that Dr. Raoult was right and supported his findings.
In an attempt to quell the controversy, the French government, by decree, authorized Professor Raoult's treatment in "military hospitals" for "patients reaching the acute phase of the disease" -- but prohibited family doctors from prescribing hydroxychloroquine. Professor Raoult replied that the treatment was only effective if administered "before the disease reaches its acute phase". [Emphasis added]
A clinical trial was launched by the government but Professor Raoult said that "the trial is not based on the treatment I use and is destined to fail."
On April 10, Professor Raoult published data showing that he had treated and cured 2,401 patients. A recent international poll of thousands of doctors rated hydroxychloroquine the "most effective therapy" for combating COVID 19. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized widespread "compassionate use" of hydroxychloroquine, while awaiting the results of scientific tests, projects to be complete in "a year or a year and a half".
Philippe Douste Blazy, Professor in Medicine, former French Minister of Health, said that "the obstructive behavior of Emmanuel Macron and the French government 'was "criminal'". He added that "the treatment proposed by Professor Raoult has positive results" and that "France will soon be the last country to refuse the use by doctors of hydroxychloroquine." He then launched a petition calling on the government to stop obstructing the use of the treatment. The text was signed by thousands of doctors, professors of medicine and other former ministers of health.
The treatment recommended by Professor Raoult still cannot be prescribed by French family doctors. A decree promulgated by President Macron on March 28 authorized doctors to use Rivotril (clonazepam) to "alleviate the suffering of patient in a state of respiratory distress". Clonazepam slows breathing and can lead to respiratory arrest. Dr. Christian Coulon, a renowned anesthesiologist, tweeted:
"Euthanasia of our elders suffering from respiratory failure. Yes, they decided [to do] it. As a doctor, I suffer deeply".
Dr. Serge Rader explained on radio on April 3 that many senior citizens living in retirement homes and who get Covid-19 are not sent to a hospital because the hospitals are overwhelmed; instead they receive an injection of Rivotril and die alone in their rooms. Many other doctors expressed their horror on social media, but added that they were powerless.
The result is that anxiety and anger have increased sharply in the population and add to the distress arising from the pandemic and the strict lockdown.
A French lawyer, Regis de Castelnau, wrote in Marianne, a center-left magazine: "The behavior of our leaders has been marked by unpreparedness, casualness, cynicism, and many of their acts imply the enforcement of the criminal law. Deliberate endangerment of the lives of others and failure to provide assistance to people in danger are obvious... In war, generals who are judged incompetent are sometimes shot. The President and other officials are well aware of this and have to know that they will be held accountable."
Economists expect the GDP of France in the second quarter of 2020 to be in free fall. One economist, Emmanuel Lechypre, said, "France will experience a very severe recession.... What is happening has never been seen in the past and the country will never be the same."
A recent survey shows that 70% of French people think that the government is not telling the truth, and 79% think that the government and the President do not know where they are going.
Before the pandemic, France was on the edge of chaos. From the moment President Macron was elected, not a single week in France has passed without demonstrations. The uprising of the "yellow vests" lasted 70 weeks and was accompanied by riots. A strike against a reform of the bankrupt French pension system that began in December 2019 lasted until the appearance of the pandemic.
On March 27, Macron said in a threatening tone that those who criticized his handling of the pandemic were "irresponsible" and that he would remember "those who did not live up to his expectations".
On April 1, the columnist Ivan Rioufol wrote in Le Figaro:
"The president is not only wrong, but he lied and let others lie. He and his team are guilty. The official speech was unable to assess the seriousness of the situation. It denied, to the point of absurdity, the usefulness of national borders... It is the government that repeated, before claiming the contrary, that masks and tests are useless. It is the State that maintains an incomprehensible confusion around chloroquine... The law of silence that Macron would like to impose is completely untenable."
Those who hold power in France seem more clueless today than before the pandemic. Sadly, a debacle in France seems increasingly closer.
In the French mainstream media, China is treated extremely politely. No journalist will remind the public that that the pandemic began in Wuhan, China. Reporters say that the United States is in a difficult situation and show New York hospitals, as if showing the suffering of Americans would alleviate the suffering of the French.
France's mainstream media would do well to fight harder for physicians to be able supply hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin and zinc sulfate. The French media would also do well to be more aware of the dirty game China is playing. On April 5, reports started coming in that in January, before China had let the world know there was a problem, it had begun deliberately lying about it. On January 14, 2020, in a tweet, the World Health Organization repeated China's lie:
"Investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China"
Meanwhile, Maria Bartiromo disclosed on Fox News, that, before alerting the world about the coronavirus crisis, China had begun cornering the market in medical supplies. It bought $2 billion worth of medical masks -- China makes half the world's supply; why would it buy them? -- as well as hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of other medical gear. Now, reports are stating that China is demanding payment from Italy for donated medical equipment that Italy had donated to China and that China now wants Italy to buy back.
Finally, it would not hurt the French media to show more compassion, to pay more attention to what they say, to watch with more care their own society, and to think about ways to find remedies to the economic and political dysfunction that unleashed such an unimaginable horror.
*Dr. Guy Millière, a professor at the University of Paris, is the author of 27 books on France and Europe.
© 2020 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.